User Score
3.1

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1057 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    Ubisoft is a **** company.
    Donate, donate, donate... is this a game?
    No, this is donate ****.
    bug, bug,bug... is this a game? Users should be a testers?
    No, this is alfa ****!
    Ubisoft you are awful!
  2. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    There is absolutely nothing to gloss over here, Ubisoft follows in the footsteps of EA and distances itself from its player community. I've been through this to some extent but now it's enough and I will distance myself from any games that continue to play this paywall policy. I am glad that next year a high-caliber player like Cyberpunk 2077 publishers like Ubisoft will outclass 5There is absolutely nothing to gloss over here, Ubisoft follows in the footsteps of EA and distances itself from its player community. I've been through this to some extent but now it's enough and I will distance myself from any games that continue to play this paywall policy. I am glad that next year a high-caliber player like Cyberpunk 2077 publishers like Ubisoft will outclass 5 leagues. 0 points for this badly programmed bad game designed for microtransactions Expand
  3. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    Tottally piece of sh1t. Activision, ty for this blank. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  4. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    Empresa bosta.
    Jogo bosta.
    Paul no cool do lira............................
  5. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    The game seems to be intentionally designed to be grindy and boring so that people will purchase their way through the grind via the rampant microtransactions. It is a shame since this game is fundamentally fun, but was intentionally made worse so it can suck money out of wallets. Like, my buddy spent $120 on the game and already feels like he has hit a grinding wall and either has toThe game seems to be intentionally designed to be grindy and boring so that people will purchase their way through the grind via the rampant microtransactions. It is a shame since this game is fundamentally fun, but was intentionally made worse so it can suck money out of wallets. Like, my buddy spent $120 on the game and already feels like he has hit a grinding wall and either has to shell out or put down the game he just bought because progression is so slow. Expand
  6. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    The microtransactions are unacceptable, especially because you pay 60 for the damn game.
  7. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    60$-100$ pre-alpha game with absolutely disgusting micro transactions. Oh boy ubisoft crossed the line this time
  8. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    Movement is super super bad and klunky, gunplay is sooooooo stupid, enimies doesn’t scale with the player level well. DONT BUY DONT BUY DONT BUY, let the revolvers and publisher of the game learns to never publish a game with this level of poor design.
  9. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    This is just a copy and paste of wildlands with division 2 gameplay features. It's no good and I'm happy I borrowed it from a friend before he sold it
  10. Oct 2, 2019
    0
    Do not support greedy suprise mechanics and microtransactions. Turn the other cheek and this will happen to your favorite franchise
  11. Oct 3, 2019
    0
    Micro-transactions and a permanent internet connection required to play single. Ubi$oft doesn't care about the community, doesn't respect her.
  12. Oct 3, 2019
    0
    Bought the Ultimate Edition to play early just to find it riddled with micro transactions. Ubisoft has made it clear they don't give a single f**k about their fan base & I'll be avoiding their overpriced garbage in future. Just lost a long time fan, but with the way Ubisoft has been heading it was inevitable. If you like overpriced crap filled with micro transactions than this game is for you.
  13. Oct 3, 2019
    0
    "Time saver" microtransactions. Come on. Wtf? Are you not suposed to dumb your time in this game? I am fine with cosmetics, but this...this is crossing thr line
  14. Oct 3, 2019
    0
    Garbage. Ubisoft looks like totally EA and should be punished for it. Every garbage game with mictrotransactions should be rated equal their greed. 0 for this s*t
  15. Oct 3, 2019
    0
    This game is a totally piece of garbage. Monetizations schemes, pay to win. This review is from a wildlands fan. Dont waste your money and vote NO with your wallet.
  16. Oct 3, 2019
    0
    Proper turd game
    Proper turd game
    Proper turd game
    Turd game proper
    Game turd proper
    Unisoft turd , money grabbing knob jockeys
  17. Xee
    Oct 3, 2019
    0
    The game is worse than every previous entry in every aspect but graphics. Bland, grindy, soulless. And the store, oh lord the store... The gameplay is just the bait to get you interested, tired and make you spend to "save time". Save yourself some time - stay away. For free.
  18. Oct 3, 2019
    0
    I just want to say first of all, I didn't purchase this game.

    Like most people I have been looking forward to purchasing Ghost Recon Breakpoint for months only to discover through a recent vague tweet that it was online-only. Now that the game has been released for early access, I realise why this game was created as an online-only title. And that is to give Ubisoft the means to target
    I just want to say first of all, I didn't purchase this game.

    Like most people I have been looking forward to purchasing Ghost Recon Breakpoint for months only to discover through a recent vague tweet that it was online-only. Now that the game has been released for early access, I realise why this game was created as an online-only title. And that is to give Ubisoft the means to target people through the excessive microtransaction system that they have adopted for this game.

    I have already contacted Ubisoft and told them to delete my uplay account, and any other accounts associated because of this issue. For many years I have purchased Ubisoft games, and have been very loyal as a consumer. Assassins Creed, Watch Dogs, Wildlands etc. But when I discovered that Ghost Recon Breakpoint was online-only, I decided to take a stand, and have made a personal vow to give no more custom to Ubisoft until their improper policies change. If we as gamers, do not draw this line in the sand right here and now, this problem will escalate to a point where the entire gaming industry will suffer significantly as a result.

    Just stop and think about the many people who do not have an Internet connection. And also stop and think about all the people who are being financially exploited by these microtransactions. It is easy to say that people are not forced to use these microtransactions, yet there are many news stories of vulnerable people running up huge bills

    In my opinion we do not need legislation against microtransactions. It would send out a more powerful message if we come together as gamers, and reject the use of microtransactions. WE can be the legislation. Not just gamers. But bloggers, YouTube gamers, reviewers, people in the industry. Let's advertise it everywhere. We can cripple microtransactions and these discrimatory online-only schemes through our own decisive actions. If everyone who has left a review here on Metacritic were to delete their uplay and Ubisoft accounts, it would change the dynamic of these corrupt practices in an instant.

    And just from being proactive, taking immediate and decisive action, we would rid ourselves of the practices that we detest. It is one thing to complain, but it is so much more effective to take immediate action. This is not just Ubisoft, this applies to other developers and games too. So let's get the ball rolling. Let's create a wave of awareness to save our gaming industry, and let's take decisive action together so that we can ALL continue to enjoy the games we play whether that is online or offline, and without being financially exploited.

    Let's tell Sony that if they are not transparent about how games are going to be sold on the PS5, that we are not going to invest in their console. As consumers we have had enough of guessing whether games will be online or offline, or whether we will be bombarded with these microtransactions. Let's take a stand not just for our own interests, but for the interests of others too. I would rather everyone be able to access and enjoy a game rather than just a select few.

    The games as a service model does not benefit any of us. And by showing our absolute unwaivering unity, we can ensure that such practices are completely unworkable.
    Expand
  19. Oct 3, 2019
    0
    So mais um jogo P2W no mesmo estilo de jogo da EA, cheio de conteudos retirados do jogo para fazer idiotas pagarem por um conteúdo que já devia estar no jogo, o mais engraçado é ver esses idiotas fanboys protegendo esse lixo e dando nota 10 para esse jogo.
  20. Oct 3, 2019
    0
    It's just a bad service game. Don't waste your money on this **** If you want to play Ghostrecon, get Ghostrecon Wildlands instead. Not a perfect game either, but still way better than this trash.
  21. Oct 4, 2019
    0
    well done, guys, as always on the level!shlt!

    a lot of bugs, as if playing the alpha version, a lot of imbalance donate, Pay2Win
  22. Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Micro-transactions, endless bugs, unfinished game, broken servers, only playable online. Even if you find a copy on the street that somebody probably threw, DONT play this game.
  23. Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Congrats on ruining the best thing about Ghosts Recon
    .no offline mode and Ubisoft's Microtransactions ..
    Thanks to Ubisoft for Sponsoring! why are you supporting Ubisoft .. the game is rental .. you spend so much money till the services is gone Ok, then no thank you! Everything has to be always-online nowadays, right! It MUST be! But i like to keep my games!if you keep supporting games
    Congrats on ruining the best thing about Ghosts Recon
    .no offline mode and Ubisoft's Microtransactions ..
    Thanks to Ubisoft for Sponsoring!
    why are you supporting Ubisoft ..
    the game is rental ..
    you spend so much money till the services is gone
    Ok, then no thank you!
    Everything has to be always-online nowadays, right! It MUST be!
    But i like to keep my games!if you keep supporting games like
    Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Breakpoint Ubisoft's Microtransactions
    , by the time 2020 comes ,we all going to be paying 200 dollars
    a game . no more $60..Ghost Recon Wildlands is better offline and online ..
    you get to keep the game ...is not a online rentals service
    Expand
  24. Oct 4, 2019
    0
    Very unfortunate that this game is built around it's micro transactions and generic loot system. Along with excessive in-game purchases you'll find bugs, repetitive uninteresting gameplay, and terrible AI.
    This game could have stood out if they chose to improve on previous ghost recon titles, but instead they chose greed over quality.
    Even if there's very little fun to be had at times
    Very unfortunate that this game is built around it's micro transactions and generic loot system. Along with excessive in-game purchases you'll find bugs, repetitive uninteresting gameplay, and terrible AI.
    This game could have stood out if they chose to improve on previous ghost recon titles, but instead they chose greed over quality.

    Even if there's very little fun to be had at times with Ghost Recon: Breakpoint. I can't support gaming companies that exploit their consumers this way.
    Expand
  25. Oct 4, 2019
    0
    I waist my 120$ the worst game ever! When i buying brakepoint i think the game will be like wildlands but improved. The pvp is So sucks. That same progres like PVE and pvp? Rly? All ppl going with sniper rifes! and if you would like play to pvp you MUST play in PVE! Worst thing what i ever seen! No classes! You can be sniper and going with ppm! And assault with sniper rifes? No drones andI waist my 120$ the worst game ever! When i buying brakepoint i think the game will be like wildlands but improved. The pvp is So sucks. That same progres like PVE and pvp? Rly? All ppl going with sniper rifes! and if you would like play to pvp you MUST play in PVE! Worst thing what i ever seen! No classes! You can be sniper and going with ppm! And assault with sniper rifes? No drones and season pass for what?! Ubi what a shame. Dont buy this game Expand
  26. Oct 4, 2019
    0
    First things first, DO NOT buy this game.

    Lemme explain. I spent about 350 hours on Wildlands. Story was ok, skirmishes were intense, great content overall. I spent 15 hours on Breakpoint, and I just uninstalled it. I spent 60 bucks for a game who isn't worthy of being called a beta-version. Cons: - Rigged with bugs. Over the 3 first hours playing, I spent about 10 minutes
    First things first, DO NOT buy this game.

    Lemme explain. I spent about 350 hours on Wildlands. Story was ok, skirmishes were intense, great content overall.

    I spent 15 hours on Breakpoint, and I just uninstalled it.

    I spent 60 bucks for a game who isn't worthy of being called a beta-version.

    Cons:
    - Rigged with bugs. Over the 3 first hours playing, I spent about 10 minutes floating around, walking on air. Half of the time spent inside an helicopter, my character was floating ou of the vehicle.

    - Whenever I started to get pulled in the story, it was shut down by the EXCRUCIATING AMOUNT OF TIME NEEDED TO LEVEL UP. Oh wait what's that ? You can actually speed up the process with micro transactions ? Fondle these balls, Ubisoft.

    - The AI (and combat in general). In Wildlands, I liked to play with the heavy sniper, as you could just kill a few goons from far away, the rest of them would hide and sound the alarm. Now you've got like, interns goons, who will happily stand in place while you kill them from afar. I cleared most of the bases by dropping a few mines at the entrance and then just shooting at the ground in front of the entrance. Ai will pack up, run toward the noise, get killed by the mines, done.

    - The character design. Sony called, they want their PS2 graphics back. Most of characters look like they're made of plastic, and then got some massive face surgery. I haven't seen such blocky faces since Mass Effect: Andromeda.

    Overall, this is a complete failure. Story was written by a Michael Bay wannabe high on acid, and character design was made using MS Paint. Every element that made Wildlands fun has been taken away, even the hunt for good weapons has been reduced to "Oh, you want a good sniper ? Then spend ~5 hours grinding for it. Oh, you want the BEST sniper ? That'll be 15 bucks mate".

    Pros:
    - Gotta be honest, sound design is good. Great music, gun sounds are ok, this was nice.

    - The micro-transactions never fail. Really. Feels like Ubisoft assigned all decent developers on payment methods.

    TL;DR : Wait about a year, until they completely patch it up, and then wait for a deep sale. I wouldn't spend more than 12 bucks for this.
    Expand
  27. Oct 4, 2019
    0
    120$ for the ultimate edition?!?! DOES IT COME WITH A TACTICAL SUIT THAT MAKES U INVISIBLE OR SOME SH*T
  28. Oct 4, 2019
    0
    This has to stop...this has to be the worst game I ever played..Ubisoft has become a big joke..RIP TOM CLANCY
  29. Oct 6, 2019
    0
    - Clunky, clumsily harmonised controls that scream bad port
    - Unintuitive menus
    - Sloppy, busy-work navigation - Over-complicated, over-intrusive inventory management - Horribly designed UI with badly translated text - Infuriating, needlessly complicated interactions with NPCs - Flawed, inconsistent cover implementation - Weak, non-tactical movement - Weak, non-tactical combat -
    - Clunky, clumsily harmonised controls that scream bad port
    - Unintuitive menus
    - Sloppy, busy-work navigation
    - Over-complicated, over-intrusive inventory management
    - Horribly designed UI with badly translated text
    - Infuriating, needlessly complicated interactions with NPCs
    - Flawed, inconsistent cover implementation
    - Weak, non-tactical movement
    - Weak, non-tactical combat
    - Brain-dead AI
    - Hack storytelling and voice-acting, constant immersion-breaking
    - Feeble sound

    Wow. And none of this is to do with the Beta state of the thing; it's just fifth-rate game design and a horribly compromised basic concept. There is nothing here for the singleplayer gamer at all and it's pretty easy to tell that multiplayer will be generic and vanilla. All the tedious homework building inventory and attempting to power-up your character is so intrusive and distracting from any kind of realistic core tactical combat that it makes Division 2 look like the best tac-shooter on the market. The imminent Call of Duty game could be the worst in the series and it will still be ten times as good as this lamentable, doomed mess of a game. It's really, really horrible. Wildlands was much better and that was a cartoon. I need to play a little Control now, just to remind myself what a well-designed game is.
    Expand
  30. Oct 4, 2019
    0
    This game is a terrible sequel. The gameplay and gunplay are very underwhelming. I dont understand how they downgraded from Wildlands. No AI teammates makes it feel boring and bland. The constant looter shooter mechanics are lame and definitely not needed. The game is not fun and I dont think any amount of patches or content drops will ever make it fun. Do NOT buy. Literally the worstThis game is a terrible sequel. The gameplay and gunplay are very underwhelming. I dont understand how they downgraded from Wildlands. No AI teammates makes it feel boring and bland. The constant looter shooter mechanics are lame and definitely not needed. The game is not fun and I dont think any amount of patches or content drops will ever make it fun. Do NOT buy. Literally the worst Ghost Recon game ever. Feels so rushed and downgraded. Extremely dissatisfied. Expand
Metascore
56

Mixed or average reviews - based on 56 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 56
  2. Negative: 14 out of 56
  1. Jan 29, 2020
    80
    Ghost Recon Breakpoint offers a vast universe, where the survival aspects have been strengthened from GR Widlands. If the game suffers from a perfectible AI and a clear feeling of "déjà-vu", it doesn’t take anything away from its effectiveness. It works well, especially in coop, while the PVP is viciously nervous. An imperfect title, but with great moments, and a huge potential if handled with care by Ubisoft in the coming months.
  2. Dec 2, 2019
    40
    Ghost Recon Breakpoint is coincidentally living up to its name, being a failure and potential gravedigger for the famous franchise. Riddled with Pay-to-Win microtransactions tacked on looter shooter gameplay and pretty under average storytelling, even Jon Berenthal wasn’t enough to arise this gameplay up to some decent playable heights.
  3. 70
    At its best, Ghost Recon Breakpoint is a taut and tactical shooter that works brilliantly in co-op and is genuinely enjoyable to play but at its heart this is just another sandbox shooter and one that doesn't meet the technical standards we're used to from Ubisoft.