User Score
4.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 9 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 9
  3. Negative: 5 out of 9
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Jan 19, 2020
    3
    Came in a bundle of three games which two of I only really wanted. Watched the trailer oh deary me. The acting looked and sounded bad. Fired up the intro of the game. Yup the acting still looked and sounded bad. Typing off a virtual keyboard with a crappy controller NFW I am out.
  2. Jan 1, 2020
    8
    FMV at its finest! Not a game for everybody but definitely a blast for those who like intense story writing, mindf**king psychic twists and fantastic and ever convincing acting! It's surely a minus on the soundtrack side but all in all an absolutely awesome game and a love letter to the FMV genre.
Metascore
62

Mixed or average reviews - based on 8 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 8
  2. Negative: 1 out of 8
  1. Jul 18, 2018
    50
    To its credit, The Infectious Madness of Doctor Dekker does work far better than it should given how much the randomness holds it back, but it could have been significantly better with a more focused storyline.
  2. Jul 5, 2018
    40
    There is certainly an audience this game will appeal to, but for me personally, I was left tired and listless after each of my half hour sessions (I’d probably make a terrible psychiatrist). Also, 95% of the game takes place in the same room with the same backing ambient track that slowly worms its way into your brain after hours on repeat.
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Jul 2, 2018
    60
    While action is thin on the ground and the performances gave me flashback to my Drama GCSE, I enjoyed my time on the OPM sofa staring at Doctor Dekker's couch, refreshed by its willingness to lean in so intently to its own silliness and B-movie aesthetic. [Issue#151, p.88]