Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. p1menta
    Jul 5, 2018
    7
    same old same old, not bad, but it's still not really fine. the story is cliche and boring and stupid, and the brazillian portuguese voices are terrible, i wish i could at least play this **** in english. i dont ever play the multiplayers
  2. Zukku
    Jul 11, 2020
    2
    What a terrible game. What a sad return to WW2. I actually enjoy the campaigns of COD games - this is the first that i just find totally unplayable. Bad characters, the worst quick-time-events i've ever seen, arcade-style shooting and the most boring story.
  3. FreedomFighters
    Jun 14, 2020
    5
    Here’s a game I never expected that I’d be writing a review of. I’ve played a few of the “Call of Duty” games before, but I’d say I have a weird history with this franchise. My friends and I have spent numerous hours playing several “Call of Duty” games (notably the “Black Ops” sub-series) in local multiplayer (mostly through fighting bots and taking on Zombies), and I’ve had some funHere’s a game I never expected that I’d be writing a review of. I’ve played a few of the “Call of Duty” games before, but I’d say I have a weird history with this franchise. My friends and I have spent numerous hours playing several “Call of Duty” games (notably the “Black Ops” sub-series) in local multiplayer (mostly through fighting bots and taking on Zombies), and I’ve had some fun playing those games, since I enjoy some local cooperative multiplayer with friends, but “Call of Duty” is in a weird boat where I feel it's simultaneously the most underrated and overrated game franchise out now. Underrated in that the games are relatively fun in short bursts, and perhaps not as bad as the internet might lead you to believe, but overrated in that they aren’t nearly as good as their blockbuster sales might lead you to believe. “Call of Duty” is not one of the greatest franchises in gaming, it’s simply one of the most persistent, as it continues to receive yearly installments that sell like hotcakes in spite of their general averageness. And while 2017’s “Call of Duty: WWII” was a hyped entry when it was announced for returning to the boots-on-ground gameplay style after so many futuristic entries, this entry honestly epitomizes the “averageness” that has rendered the series unexciting.
    “Call of Duty: WWII,” presentation-wise, does things pretty solidly: of course, the game is graphically impressive, just as any number of Activision games are, and gameplay-wise, it's at the very least functional. It’s fast-paced, the controls are fluid, and the gunplay is competent stuff. Beyond the campaign, this is another “Call of Duty” game that I’ve played with friends (as I mentioned, mostly against bots because that’s what we like), and it is occasionally pretty fun. This is a very minor thing, but I never got to mention this when I reviewed “Battlefield 1,” which I’m using just for the sake of comparison, but one thing I found so fun in that game was being able to use a shovel as a weapon, just because it was so jarring yet gratifying. “Call of Duty: WWII” does also allow you to use a shovel, which…I’m sorry, I know it’s really minor, but I just get a kick out of it.
    The reason I had to mention something that minor, though, is because I'm really reaching to find something positive to say about this game. I had some big issues with it, but the biggest, most glaring one is this: if you've played one “Call of Duty” game, you’ve played them all, and this entry hits that nail on the head. There’s nothing exciting about the gameplay here, it’s competently made but severely lacking in anything that captivating. Beyond the lack of standout gameplay elements (well, outside of vehicle sections that stand out for the WORST reasons), the campaign is unbelievably short and painfully unfulfilling. Much of the story is a mishmash of clichés with forgettable characters, and the game is so cinematic that it feels like most of the game’s length is spent watching. I know I mentioned in my review of “Battlefield 1” that it too had a campaign that felt short and occasionally had too much watching, but “Call of Duty: WWII” takes those flaws and turns them up to eleven. And the difference here is that “Battlefield 1” actually had a good game to go along with it, but with “Call of Duty: WWII,” I mean, I just beat the remaster of “Modern Warfare 2” about a month ago and I feel like I’m playing that exact same game here. By the way, I know I’m hanging around the “Battlefield 1” comparison a lot in this review, and I don’t want this to feel like a compare-and-contrast piece because a game should be judged on its own, but frankly, I feel the comparison is worth bringing up because I refuse to believe that “Call of Duty: WWII” would exist had the fanbase not caused such a stink about “Infinite Warfare” a year prior, and then EA not hit it so big with the announcement and trailer for “Battlefield 1” not long after. This game feels like it was conceptualized and created only to ride on the coattails of “Battlefield 1,” and frankly, to me, it often just feels like a rip-off of it.
    I really have to hand it to the “Call of Duty” series, because it is just extremely good at diluting and watering down the entire FPS genre for the biggest audience possible, most specifically casual gamers who don’t play enough video games to understand why the franchise is not nearly on the level of creativity as the many games it finds itself so eager to copy off of And that is precisely the case with “Call of Duty: WWII,” which has its moments of fun, but continues to carry a “been there, done that” vibe. It’s the same game you’ve played for years, and it remains a very safe, stale, lowest common denominator shooter that I can’t help but feel simply indifferent towards.
    Final rating: 5 out of 10 “Hmm…”    … Expand
  4. MetroidFelipe
    Feb 24, 2019
    1
    Worst Call Of duty , Return of WW II no Thats a pile o ****

    Pior Call of Duty que joguei campanhas em graça, multiplayer pobre e cheio de microtransações, não pula as cinematics lixo armas não realistas, Inteligência artificial burra e repetitivo,
    Passe Longe quer um bom game Coop jogue Battlefield 4 ou One, ou os Antigos Call Of Duty como o World At War!
  5. colinsmall34
    May 3, 2018
    9
    This review is only for the campaign (as I don't use COD online): Absolutely fantastic graphics, perhaps the best I've seen in a PS4 game so far! Great gameplay although very challenging at times, interesting story which is emotional at times, and also a good range of gameplay through infantry, airforce, tanks, etc. This is probably the best COD campaign I've ever played, and it wasn'tThis review is only for the campaign (as I don't use COD online): Absolutely fantastic graphics, perhaps the best I've seen in a PS4 game so far! Great gameplay although very challenging at times, interesting story which is emotional at times, and also a good range of gameplay through infantry, airforce, tanks, etc. This is probably the best COD campaign I've ever played, and it wasn't overly short either. I felt like it was ok value for money, as long as you buy the game pre-owned, play the campaign then sell it on.… Expand
  6. HaloFever
    Jul 9, 2020
    9
    Call of Duty: WWII is peak Call of Duty to me (because I have not played the Modern Warfare reboot or CoD:BlOpsIIII). I think back to playing Call of Duty: Ghosts a few years into the current generation and thinking about how awful it looks next to PS4 exclusives like Uncharted 4. Now we have a Call of Duty that finally looks, feels, and sounds like a current gen game. Activision stoppedCall of Duty: WWII is peak Call of Duty to me (because I have not played the Modern Warfare reboot or CoD:BlOpsIIII). I think back to playing Call of Duty: Ghosts a few years into the current generation and thinking about how awful it looks next to PS4 exclusives like Uncharted 4. Now we have a Call of Duty that finally looks, feels, and sounds like a current gen game. Activision stopped counting money and finally made a great game.

    Let's gloss over the multiplayer. It is the classic boots on the ground game that fans have been supposedly clamoring for since Call of Duty added cyborgs and exoskeletons. As an old school gamer, I love it. Jumping into a match was as disorienting as ever for a new player yet I the shooting and killing is the same. I love that I can pick up great weapons off the corpses of higher level players. I think an equal start mode would be better, liked fixed classes in Team Fortress and Overnight. Overall, I love the old school World War 2 action and finding a match was incredibly easy. There is also a zombie mode for co-op lovers. No one says that Call of Duty is not the complete package, unless they are talking about CoD:BlOpsIIII because that game did not have a single player campaign.

    The single player campaign in in CoD:WWII is the best I've played in a Call of Duty game since CoD 4: Modern Warfare back in in the 00s. The campaign is so good, it rivals the campaigns in great single player only games. Although the game is focused on the grim reality of World War 2, the developers added a lot of fun elements like sniping levels, a little tank action, and some light air combat. The tank inspired level was all the more amazing with the destructible environment and the great audio. You can hear the crunch as you drive over piles of bricks. Why doesn't Activision make an entire game like this, and I don't mean the pay-to-win World of Tanks? The air combat section was a bit kindergarten (no pun intended) but still looked and sounded great. If the ACE Combat series looked this good, I would buy into it. The stealth missions will hold your hand, as usual, to a certain extent, and letting the game proceed after failing with stealth is new. In many ways, CoD:WWII felt like a mashup of World War 2 game classics minus Castle Wolfenstein. (Wouldn't a Call of Duty version of the Great Escape be bonkers? I suppose it was done in CoD:BlOps but then again, when has Activision every refrained from repeating itself?)

    The health system in WWII is a bit iffy. Rather than crouching under cover to regain health, the player character uses health packs. Sometimes a buddy will toss you a health pack and sometimes you find them laying around in the forest. I see this as a side-grade of the usual health system that Call of Duty borrowed from Halo: Combat Evolved. What the game really needs is a true a.i. system that does not have every gun trained with 100% accuracy on the player character.

    The NPCs will shout "Daniels" a few times a minute. If you are named Daniels, then you will love this game. Or you might hate it. The developers are pushing toward immersion and they succeed halfway because the barks from the NPCs are too constant and the game still has to throw up on-screen directions. The levels are also designed to be idiot proof. The player area is in most cases quite narrow and serve to funnel players back onto the set path. The game does not reward curiosity, even if there are 33 mementos to collect.

    The story is the real star of the campaign. The character detail and voice acting help to sell it. World War 2 aficionados will know the context of the battles, even if the details do not all seem authentic. The human story, however, is told well, and I do not envy the men who endured all those months of fighting from D-Day to crossing the Rhine.

    Full disclosure: I bought this game for $5 used from Gamestop. Then PlayStation released the game for free a month later. Activision did get some of my money out of this (and they deserve it), but I think Activision's ultimate goal was to have more players to buy additional content on-line This is silly in for any historical game as the appeal of the game is the historical accuracy. If Activision focuses on making good games, people will buy them.    … Expand
  7. Voodoo123
    Oct 15, 2019
    7
    +Exceptional visual quality/animations
    +Great cast
    +Excellent level design -Predictable set pieces -Extremely linear experience There was alot of big talk from the devs leading up to the release suggesting a reinvention of the COD game design, sadly this was not the case just more of the same in a new skin - that isnt a flaw as the formula is still successful here, just    +Exceptional visual quality/animations
    +Great cast
    +Excellent level design
    -Predictable set pieces
    -Extremely linear experience

    There was alot of big talk from the devs leading up to the release suggesting a reinvention of the COD game design, sadly this was not the case just more of the same in a new skin - that isnt a flaw as the formula is still successful here, just disappointing that more couldn't be done to push the franchise forwards given the IMO extremely entertaining (but poorly received) infinite warfare. COD WW2 is a great but not ground breaking game (review as based on SP not MP).    … Expand
  8. erfanbasket
    Apr 13, 2018
    6
    the story is really simple and nothing special but the game is overall entertaining
  9. JerTheStampede
    Apr 29, 2021
    1
    I hadn't picked up a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 2 back on the Xbox 360, I thoroughly enjoyed each instalment until BO2 at which point I felt something went horribly wrong but couldn't put my finger on it at the time.
    Roll on several years and I picked up WWII for PS4, to start with I thought yes the controls are tight the action reasonably well paced I thought 'this might be pretty    I hadn't picked up a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 2 back on the Xbox 360, I thoroughly enjoyed each instalment until BO2 at which point I felt something went horribly wrong but couldn't put my finger on it at the time.
    Roll on several years and I picked up WWII for PS4, to start with I thought yes the controls are tight the action reasonably well paced I thought 'this might be pretty solid'.. I was wrong.
    1st the quick time events (QTE) are horrible maybe it's me but reading the prompts wasn't obvious initially, and these QTE start getting over used real quick.
    2nd If anything makes me scream obscenities at a game it's headshotting an enemy (not a boss a normal grunt) and them getting up as if nothing more inconvenient than a tenis ball had bopped them on the nose and if you shoot a German in his velar weave mithril silver trench coat expect to empty several rounds to inconvenience him, what the hell man!? it isn't 1996 anymore! games moved past this kind of cheap bullet sponging decades ago.
    3rd British SOE agents, there is SOO much wrong with this anyone with half a brain or any level of understanding of the SOE is forced to cringe and I'm not talking about the now obligatory female agent (they existed maybe not in the capacity shown but I can live with that) what made me cringe was as soon as SOE were mentioned I thought ok when do they roll out the cockney weasels.. TADA as if by magic.
    By the time I derailed an heavily armoured train WITH A JEEP!!! ffs I had had enough, I couldn't suspend my disbelief any further this campaign was badly written poorly implemented garbage.
    I'm glad I didn't pay full price for this game I would have felt violated.
    I'm yet to try the multiplayer, for all I enjoy MP COD, the campaign is primarily why I used to buy these titles.    … Expand
  10. PeterAlexander
    Sep 11, 2018
    7
    Call of Duty WWII has an amazing campaign, but it isn't enough to save it from being one of the weaker entries in the series. The online play is disengaging and tarnished by easily forgettable maps and the zombies mode is incredibly lacklustre in comparison to the main Black Ops series entries.
  11. njja02
    Jun 17, 2018
    4
    Better than the last few CODs, but still pretty average. The campaign this time around was too over-the-top and repetitive for me. But the multiplayer did add one mode that I enjoyed; War. Plus the zombies was a bit better this time around. But it just didn't do much for me overall.
  12. geo333
    Jun 25, 2022
    7
    This game would have gotten a better score by me if it was not for the glitches in the campaign some of them just are soo bad considering I played this game 5 years later after its release, it should have been fixed aside from it, the campaign is fantastic and the multiplayer great as well, if you like ww2 stuff this is a gem, great game.
  13. kylocosplay
    Jul 29, 2020
    7
    Le he puesto un 7 porque la campaña me pareció espectacular, el nivel de gráficos está a nivel del the last of us 2 y las interpretaciones son muy buenas, la campaña te lleva a batallas muy importantes de la SGM como el desembarco de Normandía, la jugabilidad innova como curar mediante botiquines que te lo dan los compañeros o por el mapa, actos heroicos ya sean arrastrar a un soldadoLe he puesto un 7 porque la campaña me pareció espectacular, el nivel de gráficos está a nivel del the last of us 2 y las interpretaciones son muy buenas, la campaña te lleva a batallas muy importantes de la SGM como el desembarco de Normandía, la jugabilidad innova como curar mediante botiquines que te lo dan los compañeros o por el mapa, actos heroicos ya sean arrastrar a un soldado herido para llevarlo a cubierto o salvarlo de un aprieto. Los zombis no están nada mal y el multijugador está muy bien hecho con una lobby donde coger misiones, abrir paquetes de ayuda, duelos 1 vs 1...
    Conclusión, a mi me ha encantado y gracias a PSPlus que lo regalaron lo he podido jugar, el único defecto que tiene el juego es que en mi PS4 PRO los ventiladores se ponen al máximo que incluso a veces me salía el mensaje de sobrecalentamiento, por lo demás todo está muy bien.    … Expand
  14. SleepNot
    Mar 7, 2021
    7
    Call of duty WW2 is a good game. It’s good action without drama and soul :) Good to kill but not very interesting
  15. trival
    Oct 21, 2020
    3
    just **** ... single play camp sucks hard. dumb missions historically innacurate.
  16. filip92
    Jul 9, 2022
    8
    Campaign is very good. There are no big WW2 games for a long time, but this COD hits it very hard with a storytelling. Brutal and emotional campaign. Must try.
  17. Empyrea
    Sep 19, 2021
    8
    I only played the campaign and I just can say that I liked it. Graphics are good and gameplay as well. Bad things would be that you have to download 35 GB if you want to play this game even if you are only going to play the campaign. It's the first time I see this. I normally play games english but because I would have to change the language of my ps4 I played directly in Spanish. VoicesI only played the campaign and I just can say that I liked it. Graphics are good and gameplay as well. Bad things would be that you have to download 35 GB if you want to play this game even if you are only going to play the campaign. It's the first time I see this. I normally play games english but because I would have to change the language of my ps4 I played directly in Spanish. Voices were ok but the recording of the voices was quite bad (sometimes loud, sometimes low). I didn't try the zombies because I'm not a fan of them. Good game.

    The campaign is 11 missions plus the epilog and each mission last about half an hour so it will take you about 6 hours.    … Expand
  18. arostislavna
    Jun 19, 2020
    6
    This game is inauthentic for a WWII experience, which is a shame because Activision is banking on success since the last 4 lackluster games.

    The Campaign is average, arcade-y, and in part feels like a remastered Medal of Honor: Underground. Multiplayer is pretty much exactly the same as every game before it. I will give praise to Nazi Zombies, being able to unlock and choose    This game is inauthentic for a WWII experience, which is a shame because Activision is banking on success since the last 4 lackluster games.

    The Campaign is average, arcade-y, and in part feels like a remastered Medal of Honor: Underground.

    Multiplayer is pretty much exactly the same as every game before it.

    I will give praise to Nazi Zombies, being able to unlock and choose characters is fantastic.    … Expand
  19. barryburton
    Jul 31, 2018
    9
    This game contains a truly fantastic single player campaign. Story as good as most Hollywood war movies, not far off the likes of Fury (simple and overly patriotic but entertaining). Gameplay is tight, accurate and very rewarding.

    In my opinion it does what it sets out to do excellently. Don't expect the depth of an open world RPG- this is an action packed, linear shooter that rewards    This game contains a truly fantastic single player campaign. Story as good as most Hollywood war movies, not far off the likes of Fury (simple and overly patriotic but entertaining). Gameplay is tight, accurate and very rewarding.

    In my opinion it does what it sets out to do excellently. Don't expect the depth of an open world RPG- this is an action packed, linear shooter that rewards reflexes and accuracy. The story knits it together nicely and has some moral and historical messages that while a little trite might be of value to those not familiar with WW2 history.

    Graphics are realistic, very detailed and smooth on the normal PS4, and the cut scenes could genuinely be stylized live action at times.

    The campaign is relatively short but extremely dense, there is not a second of boredom. Reasons to replay include higher difficulties and collectibles. It is nicely varied with sniping, trench warfare, turrets, stealth, planes, tanks, jeeps and more. The short tank sequence in particular is brilliantly tense if you get into the mindset.

    There are some horrible weapons too like flamethrowers and double-barrelled shotguns make you pity the Nazi victims at times.

    I don't play multiplayer FPS so cannot comment on that. Zombies looks like a fun addition.

    It's not a 10 because it isn't incredibly original, and the campaign could be a little longer, with perhaps a bit more flexibility on routes or tactics.

    I gather most of the griping on here is about the multiplayer. I'd honestly ignore those complaints and highly recommend picking up the game just for the campaign.    … Expand
  20. Lewis-Angelo
    Oct 12, 2018
    6
    la historia está bien, pero es una de cal y otra de arena constante
    gráficamente es una pasada, con unas cgi brutales, y algunas misiones que están muy chulas
    el sonido normalito, con un doblaje mejorable y una mezcla bastante mala, sorprende porque ahí solían ser los mejores y se nota descuidado el argumento obviamente no sorprende y se ha quedado corta, se hecha de menos que avancen    la historia está bien, pero es una de cal y otra de arena constante
    gráficamente es una pasada, con unas cgi brutales, y algunas misiones que están muy chulas
    el sonido normalito, con un doblaje mejorable y una mezcla bastante mala, sorprende porque ahí solían ser los mejores y se nota descuidado
    el argumento obviamente no sorprende y se ha quedado corta, se hecha de menos que avancen más, imposible no acordarse de los Medal of Honor
    y como COD tampoco es que destaque, mejor que los Black Ops es fácil ser, pero el Advanced Warfare les había quedado mejor a Sledgehammer

    detalles como que te falte una bala en el rifle y meta las 5 de golpe quedan mal, el apuntado del francotirador que ralentiza tampoco me ha entusiasmado, la IA parece que ha ido hacia atrás, vuelven los enemigos infinitos en algunas zonas, etc
    o que se quede el juego pillado porque tienes que ponerte en X zona para que pase Y cosa, pero como ya te moviste previendo la acción, pues estás matando enemigos atontados mientras el juego espera que vuelvas al sitio

    del multijugador y los zombies mejor no decir nada, ya ni atrae probar esos modos    … Expand
  21. MadMax3
    Oct 1, 2020
    0
    Trash mais um jogo mal desenvolvido pela activision, tinha potencial para ser o melhor, mas como sempre os bugs e os glichs tomam contam de um jogo promissor.
  22. frederik1478
    Oct 19, 2021
    4
    This game could have been amazing but the set pieces and the constant taking control away leave you with a kind of nothing and boring feeling, har unskippable cutscenes which just takes the replay value ride out of it,
  23. alexstunky
    May 25, 2018
    6
    Que puedo decir.....no es mal juego, pero tampoco brilla.
    Tenia esperanzas de que este juego subiera esta saga, pero creo que nos quedo a deber mucho, eso si la campaña me encanto demasiado, pero....el MP es mas de lo mismo cada año, no innova en nada, a veces es divertido, pero como dije antes, es mas de lo mismo cada año, lleno de DLC y obvio el modo zombies es lo mejor de cada año,    Que puedo decir.....no es mal juego, pero tampoco brilla.
    Tenia esperanzas de que este juego subiera esta saga, pero creo que nos quedo a deber mucho, eso si la campaña me encanto demasiado, pero....el MP es mas de lo mismo cada año, no innova en nada, a veces es divertido, pero como dije antes, es mas de lo mismo cada año, lleno de DLC y obvio el modo zombies es lo mejor de cada año, pero los DLC son muy exagerados ya, una lastima estas políticas.    … Expand
  24. Leandro5an
    Jun 20, 2020
    7
    Hace años que no jugaba un Call of Duty. Me gustó la campaña pero nunca tanto para ponerle una nota verde. En el online no sé para qué pone en franco tiradores si los mapas son super chicos (pequeños).
  25. BSchwarz95
    Nov 14, 2018
    7
    True CoD will always have three pillars to the game: campaign, zombies, and multiplayer. The campaign was okay, the zombies was great, and the multiplayer was an absolute blast. I haven't played a Call of Duty game since MW3, until WWII. I jumped into the multiplayer and loved every second of it. There weren't many maps at the start but that meant that players could completely master theirTrue CoD will always have three pillars to the game: campaign, zombies, and multiplayer. The campaign was okay, the zombies was great, and the multiplayer was an absolute blast. I haven't played a Call of Duty game since MW3, until WWII. I jumped into the multiplayer and loved every second of it. There weren't many maps at the start but that meant that players could completely master their technique and strategy in order to bend the combat to their will. My favorite game mode was easily Hardcore Dom and after reaching master prestige, I still can't get enough of that game mode. The zombies mode felt fresh, too. The easter eggs, mechanics, and story were exciting to spend time with and although it's exactly what you'd expect the zombies mode to be like, I still thoroughly enjoyed it as somebody who never felt interested in playing it at all. And, the campaign. Meh. It was "fine." The story, gameplay, level design, characters, all acceptable with no real emotion or excitement at all. All in all, a lot of fun but the lack of true creative genius makes this a hard recommendation. This is more of a guilty pleasure than anything else.… Expand
  26. boris_out
    Jun 3, 2020
    8
    Одна из лучших сюжетных компаний шутеров за последние года, и уж точно самая лучшая компания за последние игры серии call of duty.
  27. SethDaReviewer
    May 3, 2018
    8
    It may not be a great game per say, but it is in my opinion a fun and mindless shooter. I really love the online community and it's plentiful plethora of World War 2 weaponry. Play this games multiplayer if you are looking for a fun mindless experience.
    In my opinion I really like the campaign, sure the D-day stage maybe forgettable but advancing forward in my case I got enthralled into    It may not be a great game per say, but it is in my opinion a fun and mindless shooter. I really love the online community and it's plentiful plethora of World War 2 weaponry. Play this games multiplayer if you are looking for a fun mindless experience.
    In my opinion I really like the campaign, sure the D-day stage maybe forgettable but advancing forward in my case I got enthralled into the campaign with it's high octane action, amazing single player narrative and great cutscenes.    … Expand
  28. CoreGamer1408
    Jun 3, 2020
    5
    Dropped on PS+ for free and gave it ago. Nice visuals lots of cinematic action and cut scenes. You know the usual scripted CoD formula story telling and gameplay. Not into PvP MP shooters so the SP campaign is the only thing I do in CoD games. Period World War shooters have been done to death. Modern Military shooters have been done to death. Personally I preferred the out of this worldDropped on PS+ for free and gave it ago. Nice visuals lots of cinematic action and cut scenes. You know the usual scripted CoD formula story telling and gameplay. Not into PvP MP shooters so the SP campaign is the only thing I do in CoD games. Period World War shooters have been done to death. Modern Military shooters have been done to death. Personally I preferred the out of this world CoD like Infinite Warfare the most. Glad Call of Cliche was free of sorts. I was bored and out by the third level.… Expand
  29. weirdmagican21
    Jan 11, 2019
    1
    i really wanted to like this game i wanted to grind to max rank nut this is probably the worst launch in call of duty history and the microtransactions are disrespectful to people who fought in WWII and the veterans who are still alive today.
  30. Maxttvd
    Jun 18, 2020
    8
    CoD WW2 tem excelente campanha e multiplayer e co-op que ficam no meio termo de bons e medianos, mesmo sendo o melhor disponível no PS4 depois de BO3.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »