Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. JeremyDoesGames
    Nov 5, 2017
    7
    1. Don't get ANY of the negative reviews

    2. Why is a 7 considered mixed? To me it means really good; 5 is mixed for me and under that is negative Anyway, onto the review. "Call of Duty: WWII" is the best "Call of Duty" game since "Black Ops 2" a mere 5 years ago. The gameplay feels fresh, the campaign has an excellent story (and it's the games' biggest strongpoint), and the    1. Don't get ANY of the negative reviews

    2. Why is a 7 considered mixed? To me it means really good; 5 is mixed for me and under that is negative

    Anyway, onto the review.

    "Call of Duty: WWII" is the best "Call of Duty" game since "Black Ops 2" a mere 5 years ago. The gameplay feels fresh, the campaign has an excellent story (and it's the games' biggest strongpoint), and the characters are really great. The multiplayer is nothing new, but it is fun. It's not a GREAT game, but I really enjoyed play "Call of Duty: WWII" (especially for the campaign), and I'm excited to play it some more. A pretty solid entry to this series that hasn't had a good game in years.    … Expand
  2. manuto2002
    Dec 30, 2017
    8
    1317/5000
    I have been playing Call of Duty since Black Ops 3 and I have never seen a game with such an atmosphere, it is simply fantastic and complements very well with the style of game that the game provides (frenetism and non-stop).
    In the campaign I have noticed a step forward for the next games of the saga (not extremely large but if remarkable) with the incorporation of point and    1317/5000
    I have been playing Call of Duty since Black Ops 3 and I have never seen a game with such an atmosphere, it is simply fantastic and complements very well with the style of game that the game provides (frenetism and non-stop).
    In the campaign I have noticed a step forward for the next games of the saga (not extremely large but if remarkable) with the incorporation of point and click and some decision making. This can please people or otherwise but personally to me I liked it despite not having seen it before in a COD. The plot is quite simple but you always get to enjoy it and in some cases get fondness for certain characters. One of the things that I do not like in this way is the duration of the campaign that goes around 5 or 6 hours but if you are a normal player and even a normal rhythm you can reach 9 hours. The campaign lets you do a lot of things like driving and I think they use the concept of WWII very well note of the campaign 8

    Regarding the Multiplayer I have already played about 15 hours and I can notice that it is quite addictive and the formula is to relay the same as always. That's why it's fun but the same again and again note the multi 8

    With the zombies I have tried them and it seems easier than in previous ones and it is a fun fiente note 7

    final note 7    … Expand
  3. Superuser100
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This very good game good music very good graphic this 10 10 one say this good game who wrrite 0 this game bad, not play this game, realy this game very much… Expand
  4. Saeed9988
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Ok, first of all, why are people saying the game is "not authentic".Like they explained a billion times the campaign is the historically accurate part of the goddman game, not the multiplayer.And second of all, really, your complaining about micro transactions that do no bullsh*t to your weapon other than giving it a new look.Whatever, for me the game is good, but not the best.TheOk, first of all, why are people saying the game is "not authentic".Like they explained a billion times the campaign is the historically accurate part of the goddman game, not the multiplayer.And second of all, really, your complaining about micro transactions that do no bullsh*t to your weapon other than giving it a new look.Whatever, for me the game is good, but not the best.The campaign(The historically accurate part of the game)is actually good.The old health system is great, the idea of allies giving you supplies to help you is great and much more.My only complaint is that the idea of having to press the middle button on the ps4(Or the back button on XB1 and any button you chose for it on PC)so you can see where the objective is can be annoying,Also, it makes the game look black and white.Wow.Whatever, overall the campaign is good.The multiplayer is ok, but I have 3 complaints about the multiplayer.First of all, why 9 maps(War maps don't count)?Seriously, I think they should add more(Maybe when Carentan is free which I know it will).Second of all, a lot of the tasks so you can earn rewards in the HQ can be difficult.Third and finally, 3 war maps is small.They should've added like maybe 5.Overall, the multiplayer is better(Better than last year, but we don't talk about it).Finally, zombies.First of all, the mods are OP af.Anyways, the maps that they choose were ok.The main map(The Final Reich)is really great.It has good atmosphere and the time being at night really sets the atmosphere.However, it's complex.Shadows of evil complex.Then the second and least important map(Grousten haus, I think that's what it's called), which is really hard.Even harder than The Final Reich.The map is tight, there is no box, you only have 3 wall weapons and you only have the random blitz(Basically, the wundersphere)so you can have perks.Dont forget that there is no PAP.The map is really hard(I am good at zombies and I died on round 6)due to the amount of zombies that spawn and the tightness of the map.For me, this gamemode should never be played by new players.Overall, the game is good.I hope that Activision doesn't f*** with us again and add weapons(They will, I know they will).Well, whatever.If you disagree with me then it's fine.People have different opinions and I can respect that(Unless the reason is absolute bullsh*t).… Expand
  5. BielSiqueira
    Nov 5, 2017
    10
    O jogo esta um xuxu muito bom graficos otimos jogabilidade excelentes partes epicas esse jogo esta um xuxu adoro quando os cara fala chucrute adorei e
  6. WillByers
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    Not at all surprised by the user score. Most of these haters i noticed are rpg fans, listen, you guys are the most toxic and annoying gamers in existence. Go play your childish fantasy role playing **** this game is for grown ups.
  7. PaulV97
    Nov 13, 2017
    10
    Real score is an 8.5, im scoring 10 to balance the user reviews a little. Campaign mode is pretty good, nothing great, but it is fun and has some nice epic moments. multiplayer has some connection issues, at least here in Argentina, but it works ok most of the time. Gameplay is the classic cod gunplay, do not expect nothing new. Zombies is great, best zombies map ever and it is veryReal score is an 8.5, im scoring 10 to balance the user reviews a little. Campaign mode is pretty good, nothing great, but it is fun and has some nice epic moments. multiplayer has some connection issues, at least here in Argentina, but it works ok most of the time. Gameplay is the classic cod gunplay, do not expect nothing new. Zombies is great, best zombies map ever and it is very accesibe to new players. This may not be the game best game ever, but it is really fun and its certainly the best call of duty of this generation.… Expand
  8. Jambobbyb
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    Review based on PS4 Pro @ 4K ... Single player is great looking plays well and has been thoroughly enjoyable. Zombies looks immense and plays again really well all the zombies are nicely done and the sound effects are A++ Multiplayer is decent but I feel the colour pallets is a little bit drab not massively keen on the customisation and a lot of the TDM maps are smaller sized. I’m no CODReview based on PS4 Pro @ 4K ... Single player is great looking plays well and has been thoroughly enjoyable. Zombies looks immense and plays again really well all the zombies are nicely done and the sound effects are A++ Multiplayer is decent but I feel the colour pallets is a little bit drab not massively keen on the customisation and a lot of the TDM maps are smaller sized. I’m no COD fan boy but This is the best COD in a long time 8.5//10 but I’m voting if a 9...… Expand
  9. russb23
    Nov 4, 2017
    9
    Dont see why so much complaining. i really like the game. I dont play cod for the campaign. Multiplayer is classic cod, but its back to ww2. What more can you ask? This isnt battfield or PUBG. THIS IS COD. Im realy enjoying the multiplayer, and the people complaining probably just suck to be honest. Who cares about loot crates. Just play multi player and have a blast with friends. GreatDont see why so much complaining. i really like the game. I dont play cod for the campaign. Multiplayer is classic cod, but its back to ww2. What more can you ask? This isnt battfield or PUBG. THIS IS COD. Im realy enjoying the multiplayer, and the people complaining probably just suck to be honest. Who cares about loot crates. Just play multi player and have a blast with friends. Great game. Classic WW2 cod.… Expand
  10. wigclyne
    Nov 22, 2017
    7
    It is great to have boots on the ground again and WW2 is better than Infinite Warfare but the game as whole is a let down. Online connections at launch has been terrible but this has improved but you do not share the barracks anymore . There seems to be few maps but the addition of War mode is a welcome one.

    Story mode is average and a little short but there is a decent amount of    It is great to have boots on the ground again and WW2 is better than Infinite Warfare but the game as whole is a let down. Online connections at launch has been terrible but this has improved but you do not share the barracks anymore . There seems to be few maps but the addition of War mode is a welcome one.

    Story mode is average and a little short but there is a decent amount of scenarios and does have a few great moments.

    Online, microtransactions and it seems a little light on content have let this down. More of WW2 should have been added, it was a world war after all.    … Expand
  11. Barbod
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    Call of duty is getting back ...
    With a good story and a good multiplayer part , is one of the best shooting game in this year.
    This game can make you to feel you are in WW2
  12. krokode
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    بازی شگفت انگیزیه، به شدت از سری جنگ جهانی 2 خوشم میاد. گرافیک بازی دلنشین و زیباست.داستان بازی خیلی خوبه. گیم پلی بازی حرف نداره.

    going back to WW 2 , amazing graphics, amazing sound, amazing acting, amazing gameplay, most of all amazing back to the roots. love WW 2 series and stories. really love this game, amazing. two thumbs op COD:WW2    بازی شگفت انگیزیه، به شدت از سری جنگ جهانی 2 خوشم میاد. گرافیک بازی دلنشین و زیباست.داستان بازی خیلی خوبه. گیم پلی بازی حرف نداره.

    going back to WW 2 , amazing graphics, amazing sound, amazing acting, amazing gameplay, most of all amazing back to the roots. love WW 2 series and stories. really love this game, amazing. two thumbs op COD:WW2
  13. DirectoStream
    May 19, 2018
    0
    Buah que increible decepciòn el juego es igual que los anteriores pero peor aparte de que la campaña es jodidamente dificil lo que lo hace injugable las graficas no estan tan mal graficas 6/10
  14. biggame
    Nov 13, 2017
    10
    best game ever!!1 is so much better than battlefield1........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  15. SuperkenGaming
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty WWII
    Great Campaign, mess of an online
    Call of Duty WWII comes from the sledgehammer studio that made advanced warfare and modern warfare 3… This game features a 5 and a half hour long campaign, a Nazi zombies mode and of course an online competitive mode The star of this game is hands down the campaign.. Here you play as Daniels, a member of the United States army during    Call of Duty WWII
    Great Campaign, mess of an online
    Call of Duty WWII comes from the sledgehammer studio that made advanced warfare and modern warfare 3…
    This game features a 5 and a half hour long campaign, a Nazi zombies mode and of course an online competitive mode
    The star of this game is hands down the campaign..
    Here you play as Daniels, a member of the United States army during World War II…
    You occasionally play as a few surprise characters to infiltrate or take control of a tank for example...
    But the games campaign mostly focuses on him…
    And the story here is so personal, that for the first time in call of duty’s history I felt this soldier and his story wasn’t throw away…
    Easily my favorite campaign in the entire call of duty series…
    These characters are so fleshed out, all having their own personalities to them... it feels like an interactive movie..
    You have a girl waiting for you to get home, and you feel her pulling you through the entire way as you feel immersed in the battleground of world war 2
    Unique to this campaign is that you have to manage your health…
    It’s definitely takes some time getting used to patching yourself up rather than taking cover and waiting for your health to regenerate..
    But this leaves you being more cautious and aware of cover…
    This health management is made less of a nuisance thanks to your squad members... stopping this from feeling like a survival game…
    depending on the mission you’re on you’ll have different squad mates with a cool down meter to give you a med pack or ammo for example.. Mark enemies in the field…
    Again immersing me into the game, caring about my position and where my squad mates are…
    There aren’t really those epic moments you’d expect from a call of duty campaign... as this one feels more grounded in reality…
    But there is plenty of variety as you’ll be in the trenches, in a tank, in a plane, you’ll go undercover as a Nazi.. There are car chases...
    Making this campaign hard to step away from…
    but once your time in the campaign is over its back to what you’re used to from call of duty// zombies, multiplayer, and regenerating health…
    The zombies mode this time is all about Nazi tech, you’re killing zombies for points to buy new weapons, armor, upgrades, and unlocking gates and fulfilling objectives, not so much boarding up windows this time around…
    And then there’s the online multiplayer which currently during launch weekend is a complete mess…
    The game will get stuck on a load screen… there are server issues that force you to reset your router to fix.. End game results freeze on screen not giving any indication anything is happening... finding a match is a chore…
    once you do finally get a match you’re thrown into your typical call of duty modes around some pretty weak maps…
    probably my least favorite maps in the game’s history…
    And since this is a world war 2 game the weapon variety doesn’t feel that present …
    you start choosing your infantry out of 5 choices based on your play style and working on leveling them up to unlock their unique perks…
    making matches and players more unpredictable…
    once you choose your infantry you’re given that classes weapon, though you aren’t stuck with it as you can unlock any gun with rank tokens…
    And then you take your favorite gun out into the call of duty world and level it up to unlock attachments for it…
    Pretty typical stuff
    There are also daily challenges for you to do to unlock items like supply drops or earn currency to buy cards in game and unlock a special weapon or cosmetic item to give you an xp bonus or a one hit kill bonus in zombies…
    giving players something to work towards and play for online..
    It could be just me... but the maps, modes, and variety of weapons just couldn’t hook me…
    And the games awful server issues at launch didn’t help this...
    That being said... this game is worth picking up on its own for its campaign...
    I give Call of Duty WWII
    an 8/10    … Expand
  16. StoryMaterial
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Amazing game that far surpasses my super high standards. Competitive multiplayer includes many features to work towards and the vast variety at display is outstanding. The new ideas within this game provides fresh gaming moments whether it be headquarters, the new war game mode or the numerous of other surprising additions. Lastly I can't wait for the ranked play season to begin and fromAmazing game that far surpasses my super high standards. Competitive multiplayer includes many features to work towards and the vast variety at display is outstanding. The new ideas within this game provides fresh gaming moments whether it be headquarters, the new war game mode or the numerous of other surprising additions. Lastly I can't wait for the ranked play season to begin and from what I hear ranked play is going to be done right just like this entire game!… Expand
  17. gdmatt
    Dec 22, 2017
    7
    The best CoD since Black Ops 2, however given the quality of recent titles, that's not much to brag about. A solid entry that adds nothing of any value to a tried and tired series.
  18. sgy0003
    Nov 5, 2017
    7
    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter ****

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter ****

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are fun it only lasts about 15-20 min as part of a mission, and NOT as a whole mission. Espionage while entertaining, it's easy enough for anyone with basic stealth instincts can plow through. And Stealth.....oh my god, it sucks. There is so much stealth in this game. You'd think that would be nice taking a break from full frontal combat, but these stealth sections are annoyingly paced. I was expecting a brother-in-arms type of bonding with my npc comrades, but that never happened.

    Multiplayer is also a lot better, but still kinda the same. We finally don't have jet-packs and futuristic abilities, so the gameplay is much more grounded (literally). It's still only fun when you are the one kicking asses, but you'll still be plagued with cheap shots, 6-year olds who apparently did your mother, and **** who are better than you. Oh and lootboxes, while unnecessary, shows the greedy corperate **** side of Activision in a full force.

    If you are looking to get COD, WWII is the game I'd recommend(sorta). The game looks great, campaign has its moments, and multiplayer as always needs some serious balancing.    … Expand
  19. psylife
    Nov 15, 2017
    7
    A well-paced piece of Zionist propaganda. Despite being cheesy, cliche, and misleading in its depiction of the events, it still manages to delight thanks to solid and varied game-play mechanics and an expertly designed single player campaign.
  20. Reciter5613
    Nov 9, 2017
    6
    It was alright. I mean the campaign is really what I was into then anything else.

    It really felt like a war most of the time and the story felt like Band of Brothers. Of course the stealth elements were frustrating and the objectives are hard to understand right away. The multiplayer is still the same. Mostly run & gun with you getting killed almost instantly so it seems why bother.    It was alright. I mean the campaign is really what I was into then anything else.

    It really felt like a war most of the time and the story felt like Band of Brothers. Of course the stealth elements were frustrating and the objectives are hard to understand right away.

    The multiplayer is still the same. Mostly run & gun with you getting killed almost instantly so it seems why bother. The new WAR mode was a nice idea however.

    Zombie mode was boring as ever making me wanna die just to end it.

    Overall, this installment was nice for a short time but it one of the reasons I prefer renting games then buying.    … Expand
  21. The_XIII
    Nov 6, 2017
    6
    The game is far from perfect, and honestly not that enjoyable in the long rung. But you know what's hilarious? Reading these severly autistic kids crying about black women in videogames.
  22. Paragon89
    Mar 5, 2018
    7
    Bit of a tough one to review.

    I haven't played COD since BOP2- so cant really judge on the evolution on the next-gen platforms. But based on what I've heard its been a pretty crap Era. Start with the Good. + Visuals Looks grest especially in the campaign. Havent played any of the next-gen era titles but it seems really good. I was happy with that. + Zombies is still good,    Bit of a tough one to review.

    I haven't played COD since BOP2- so cant really judge on the evolution on the next-gen platforms. But based on what I've heard its been a pretty crap Era.

    Start with the Good.
    + Visuals Looks grest especially in the campaign. Havent played any of the next-gen era titles but it seems really good. I was happy with that.

    + Zombies is still good, different but at least its not same old and they actually evolved it. But hasn't become some bloated expanded mess and have managed to keep it feeling fairly simple and ground the classic maps. They have objectives now but are entirely optional. and is better than BOP2 Zombies anyway.

    + More customisation - plenty of customisation if your into that like your character, weapon skins etc

    + War and Headquarters, adds new multiplayer depth. added value and things to do. Tries to bring a story to the multiplayer.

    + Solid Multiplayer experience, not really a plus, but if your used to what they do year in year out, and are happy with that then you know your going to get a solid pick up and play multiplayer experience to fill in your hours when your bored.

    + While I haven't played AW/BOP3/IW so I don't know if they have these features. I really like the addition of Divisions and the new way of doing Perks to create unique combinations.

    Negatives
    - My biggest gripe with COD has always been the respawn system in multiplayer progressively getting worse with each instalment coupled with the average size of maps getting smaller means I often find I have enemies closer to me than allies and usually behind me. There's no logical direction to run in when you spawn. Which with WWII is still broken it seems.

    - Loot crates, that was a obvious one to get on the list. While it doesn't really bother me for COD as its a game where you grab any gun and kill people. I don't really see the need to pay for anything for the core experience. its all mainly cosmetic. and any guns don't really hamper you.

    -value for money , there is less maps at launch and have paid the same price, fair enough there's WAR mode but doesn't really justify it as I imagine its not something the core player base will get involved with. Same with map packs, less for your money.

    Now the personal things that stand out for me

    While COD gains superficial changes each year often depending on who's developing. Some Key features are missing or changed that I miss.

    for example I loved the Support and Specialist Play styles of MF3 it was a great way to help Assist/Support and lone wolves playstyles build a different set of killstreaks/perks and bring changes to the game. While this game kinda has it with divisions and the new Perk system Its something I miss.

    Killstreaks - I know its WW2 so its rooted and limited in technology etc, but Attack Dogs is missing!? I know we have paratroopers but come on! give us more streaks! - there seems to be a general lack of streaks(different streaks as well) to be fair I cant really think of any beyond the dogs that is missing, maybe drop a AI controlled tank on the battlefield that enemy team has to blow up....

    - Rooted is bad in a way - off the back of the last point, while its nice to be simple and go back to the roots, I cant help but feel they have stripped a lot meat from its bones. and while there is a solid core experience it lacks the added value to help with longevity. I feel ive grown tired on this COD instalment a lo faster than I have the others.

    Overall I've given it a 7. Its Classic COD and I love it for that and can pass many hours playing it. its solid and you cant go wrong. however it hasn't evolved as a franchise and doesn't have the added value to make it worth the price. Id give it a 9 if they would fix the respawn system.

    Whats Next? Call of Duty: Chronicle's - a time travelling adventure that features Easters eggs and cameos from all games. and Resets the whole timeline. and the Multiplayer maps is just remastered versions of the top 20 maps of all time.    … Expand
  23. joaopontesvaz
    Mar 5, 2018
    8
    Graphics: 8.4 Sound: 8.8 Gameplay: 8.8 Fun/Story: 8.2

    A good improvement with the successful backward to the beginning of the series. Good graphics and nice gameplay.
  24. claytastic
    Feb 4, 2018
    5
    Call of Duty continues to prove itself to be the most boring franchise out there with WWII. I didn't have high expectations, and actually wasn't planning on buying it. But some of my friends told me I would enjoy it, so I got it when it was on sale. They were pretty wrong.

    Don't get me wrong, it has some of the best graphics and sound design out there, and nails the look and feel of    Call of Duty continues to prove itself to be the most boring franchise out there with WWII. I didn't have high expectations, and actually wasn't planning on buying it. But some of my friends told me I would enjoy it, so I got it when it was on sale. They were pretty wrong.

    Don't get me wrong, it has some of the best graphics and sound design out there, and nails the look and feel of World War 2. It also plays pretty well, and can be enjoyed for an unextended amount of time, but in terms of the rest of it, there's nothing here.

    Let's start off with the campaign. It's bad. I mean, what did you expect? The characters are boring and lifeless, and no amount of Hollywood actors is going to make me change my mind about that. Call of Duty just doesn't have good campaigns anymore. They pretty much stopped trying after the first Black Ops because I guess they realised that no one played the campaigns anymore. This one really proves that point, though, because in the multiplayer, they censored the Swastikas, and there are black and female soldiers running about, even on the side of the Nazis. Not that I'm opposed to diversity, but in a game selling itself on historical accuracy, that really puts a dent in the illusion. However, in the campaign, there are Swastikas everywhere, and no females in sight (minus one who plays a fairly minor role). Why do you think this is? Because no one plays the campaign. They could make it the most violent game ever, and no one would care. Besides that problem, the campaign never really has any twists or turns. It's just standard and pretty boring most of the time. I'm not gonna sit here and pretend to care about ANOTHER soldier who has family at home who we can all predict is gonna die.

    The multiplayer isn't much of a step up, either. At first, I was kinda upset that they were continuing to make futuristic games with Infinite Warfare, but World War 2 has made me realise something. Going futuristic was the best thing that happened to Call of Duty. Both Advanced Warfare and Black Ops 3 are two of my favourites because the futuristic setting allowed for more variety. The double jumps and wall running in Advanced Warfare was the biggest change the series had made since the switch to a modern setting in CoD 4. Plus, this gave them the opportunity to have more weapon and ability variety. It needed refining, but it was a nice change of pace. Black Ops 3 was the perfect follow up because it did all of the refining that needed to be done in Advanced Warfare, and became what I would say is my favourite Call of Duty (even though the campaign didn't measure up to that of previous franchise entries). The only reason I hated Infinite Warfare was because it was just Black Ops 3 with worse maps and one of the series' worst campaigns. To say World War 2 has improved on this or evolved the series in any way is a joke because all they did was return to a style that everyone thought they wanted, but then realised they didn't. I always kind of knew that just going back to modern or historical settings wouldn't automatically fix Call of Duty, but I was hoping that it would provide some slight ounce of innovation. And it kinda did. The new War mode, which is the newest thing CoD has done since the jump kits in Advanced Warfare, is actually pretty neat. You're dropped into a linear map in which you and your team either have to complete an objective or drive the other team back from doing that. And while it's infinitely more fun to play the attacking team than it is to play defending, I still enjoyed my time with it. Other than that, though, there's nothing new or fresh about World War 2's multiplayer. If you've played a modern or historical CoD's multiplayer, you've played this one.

    Lastly, there's the zombies, which has absolutely nothing new or interesting about it. It's just boring, honestly. So much so that I have absolutely nothing to say about it besides the fact that Ving Rhames is in it, so that's cool.

    Overall, CoD WW2 is the furthest thing from a fresh gaming experience as you can possibly get. It's fun in short bursts and has some creative ideas, but none of them are ever executed to their full potential. 5/10.    … Expand
  25. marcelorockz
    Dec 13, 2017
    8
    A principio a historia do jogo eu achei bem interessante e cativante, mostra o avanço dos aliados pela normandia atravessando a belgica com a famosa batalha de bulge chegando na alemanha.. Os cenarios estão muito bonitos e as cutscenes mais ainda. Para quem gosta de WWII vale a pena!
    O multiplayer eu joguei pouco, mais do mesmo, CoD de sempre.
  26. Bolkie
    Dec 25, 2017
    9
    Finally bought the game yesterday and playing online since then (I don't usually play campaigns). Had hesitated buying after all the moaning and complaining, had already skipped Infinite War, did play a huge amount of Black Ops 3. My verdict so far: a breath of fresh air! The maps are good, the shooting feels great, I am enjoying. Any hesitators should buy whether you like the wall runningFinally bought the game yesterday and playing online since then (I don't usually play campaigns). Had hesitated buying after all the moaning and complaining, had already skipped Infinite War, did play a huge amount of Black Ops 3. My verdict so far: a breath of fresh air! The maps are good, the shooting feels great, I am enjoying. Any hesitators should buy whether you like the wall running of former Cod's or just feet on the ground like this one. Oh yeah: no reason to buy supply crates with real money, just earn them, more fun that way. And not owning certain types of weapons is not game changing. See you online!… Expand
  27. JMARSseph
    Nov 13, 2017
    5
    Campaign....beautiful graphics, great sound, not very good dialogue and story and a horrible ending....
    Zombies..... great map, but of course only one... decent customization although the unlockables weren't exactly mind blowing
    Multiplayer...typical Call of Duty, extreme downgrade in presentation next to campaign and the new lobby is a poor, poor attempt to be a community playground    Campaign....beautiful graphics, great sound, not very good dialogue and story and a horrible ending....
    Zombies..... great map, but of course only one... decent customization although the unlockables weren't exactly mind blowing
    Multiplayer...typical Call of Duty, extreme downgrade in presentation next to campaign and the new lobby is a poor, poor attempt to be a community playground
    The campaign is quick and forgettable, the zombies are a dangling carrot to spend more for more and the multiplayer , as usual, was plagued with issues..... already traded this title at the local Vintage Stock...and would not recommend.....high hopes for a return to ww2 were only that, high hopes...    … Expand
  28. HappyPhilXD
    Mar 1, 2018
    5
    Just bought it for PS4 because a friend wanted to play with me.

    Visuals: Graphics are mediocre, it tries to stay at 60fps, the effects are from 2009. Controls: It's ok to play with controller, the auto aim is pretty heavy so you can hit something. It's not as smooth as Halo or Destiny when it comes to aiming. Gameplay: There are good amount of weapons but for the most times all    Just bought it for PS4 because a friend wanted to play with me.

    Visuals:
    Graphics are mediocre, it tries to stay at 60fps, the effects are from 2009.

    Controls:
    It's ok to play with controller, the auto aim is pretty heavy so you can hit something. It's not as smooth as Halo or Destiny when it comes to aiming.

    Gameplay:
    There are good amount of weapons but for the most times all players use the same guns because some of them are over effective. Talking to you fire shotgun.
    The maps are not the best part. I enjoy only 2 of the 9 maps because for the most parts there was no thought behind them.
    It wouldn't be an CoD without Cheaters. I thought there couldn't be that many Cheaters on PS4 than on PC but I was wrong. There is at least one blatant 360° spinning aimboting idiot in 1 of 3 games and some other "strange" players.

    Gamemodes:
    There are enough maps and modes to keep me occupied for a little while, most of them standard fps fast food.
    The zombie mode is good. They changed some thing and I have to say it's refreshing.
    Campaign is standard. Pew pew action with nice settings.

    All in all a normal mediocre CoD with the attempt to cash in on the World War hype Battlefield 1 started. Does nothing particular wrong but neither right. Should be ok for fans but I would suggest waiting for a sale.    … Expand
  29. johnnypxc
    Jan 17, 2018
    7
    Id rate it a 7.8/10 if there were decimals allowed here. Id say it is pretty solid in terms of returning to the classic boots on the ground combat. Its ages better than the last couple cods. The only things I really disliked about it were that id rate the zombies a 6/10 because it has changed too much from the golden day waw-bops 2 era and is far too fast paced, "if it aint broke dont fixId rate it a 7.8/10 if there were decimals allowed here. Id say it is pretty solid in terms of returning to the classic boots on the ground combat. Its ages better than the last couple cods. The only things I really disliked about it were that id rate the zombies a 6/10 because it has changed too much from the golden day waw-bops 2 era and is far too fast paced, "if it aint broke dont fix it", and of course the loot boxes which are hilariously bad, (you always get pistol grips that you cant even see on your gun).… Expand
  30. SrPepe
    Jan 2, 2018
    5
    Una campaña... cuestionable y aburrida. Si quieres pasar de dar escenarios increibles como la destrucción de la torre Eiffel o la estatua de la libertad a pelear en campos y casas viejas debes saber muy bien como manejarlo y no lo han sabido hacer. Una campaña que se me hizo aburrida.

    Probe el multijugador muy poco, pero lo mismo de siempre.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »