Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. TalentUK
    Nov 8, 2017
    0
    First things first i am glad to say i did not line activisions pockets by buying this game, i borrowed it from a mate for 2 days then asked him would he like me to bin it for him.....He said yes
    For those people who buy this (including my mate) your destroying gaming for gamers ..... while this recycled trash with added money for this and that plagues the industry you the gamers will get    First things first i am glad to say i did not line activisions pockets by buying this game, i borrowed it from a mate for 2 days then asked him would he like me to bin it for him.....He said yes
    For those people who buy this (including my mate) your destroying gaming for gamers ..... while this recycled trash with added money for this and that plagues the industry you the gamers will get ripped off with cheap nasty games like this.....The Good old copy and d paste with a new background seems to fool most off you.....It is the same game without the jumping boosts with extra censorship and lots of Bull S*$t PC .....    … Expand
  2. cheater95
    Nov 9, 2017
    1
    The game is awesome i loved the story of all campaign,multiplayer and zombies.But i put this score because it has so many bugs it's getting frustrating i can't play a game without a server error i was about to finish the Easter Egg and it kicked me out because of the server.It doesn't matter what kind of story it has or anything if you can't play a game properly.Fix the issues and the bugsThe game is awesome i loved the story of all campaign,multiplayer and zombies.But i put this score because it has so many bugs it's getting frustrating i can't play a game without a server error i was about to finish the Easter Egg and it kicked me out because of the server.It doesn't matter what kind of story it has or anything if you can't play a game properly.Fix the issues and the bugs and i'll definitely put a positive review.But for know this is what you get 100% for the bug issues.… Expand
  3. Jcupps12
    Nov 10, 2017
    3
    I can’t believe all the people praising the graphics. They are a huge turn off for me especially after seeing how good battlefield 1 looked 2 years ago they are a complete embarrassment. Online time to kill is ridiculously fast. Doesn’t matter what gun you use as recoil is no existent and again time to kill is so fast regardless it’s rarely noticeable the damage differences of weaponsI can’t believe all the people praising the graphics. They are a huge turn off for me especially after seeing how good battlefield 1 looked 2 years ago they are a complete embarrassment. Online time to kill is ridiculously fast. Doesn’t matter what gun you use as recoil is no existent and again time to kill is so fast regardless it’s rarely noticeable the damage differences of weapons unless the suppressor is attached. Sniping is essentially just everyone quick scoping. The sound design is actually fairly good but would ay I mainly noticed it on grenades and explosives. Gun sounds are better in bf1. Game play is better in bf1. Loot boxes.....I mean really? It’s fun to hop on play 3 or 4 games and then move on. Campaign is short, boring, and doesn’t seem to matter to be honest. Glad it’s back to boots on the ground but it is miles and miles and miles away from being a great game or recapturing what call of duty once was. Put simply, it’s just not very good.… Expand
  4. pappm94
    Nov 15, 2017
    2
    This is just a very very average first person shooter, that Activision releases every damn year. It is recycled, which is not a good word in the gaming industry. On top of that, microtransactions, of course.
    Just please don't buy ....
  5. Ghoster
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    Sad! I had big expectations for that game looking forward COD is back to WW2. Unfortunately game is terrible. Strong aim assist make me feel game is made for 7 years old.
  6. Guilfred
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    luck boxes en un cod? enserio, aparte de tener la campaña mas sosa y corta que e visto en un juego de la 2da guerra mundial, del asco, despues de todo eso entras al multijugador y llena de cheatters pff no recomiendo el juego, lo acabo de regresar en steam
  7. liamandjo
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Disappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to thinkDisappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to think just run around a corner and get blasted. Campaign mode is OK, hence the 1 point. But I doubt I will get back to it. And the graphics - seriously? I feel I am back on my PS3.… Expand
  8. joseLuis1
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    no lo recomiendo, las cajas con regalos caen del cielo (las cuales te sacan del video juego por completo), hay muertes ilimitadas, muy repetitivo y poco innovador, parece un casino de la segunda guerra mundial, muy decepcionado de esta entrega, espero que las próximas entregas mejoren.
  9. Rafasempere
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Un auténtico engaño de juego a base de corta-pega de otros títulos de la saga. Coge cualquiera de los últimos CoD, quítale los saltos y las movidas futuristas y ponle una skin de la segunda guerra mundial. Ya tienes el CoD WW2.
    Armas sin retroceso alguno y totalmente descompensadas, texturas y animaciones tan simples que el Counter Strike le da un buen repaso. Los mapas multijugador son    Un auténtico engaño de juego a base de corta-pega de otros títulos de la saga. Coge cualquiera de los últimos CoD, quítale los saltos y las movidas futuristas y ponle una skin de la segunda guerra mundial. Ya tienes el CoD WW2.
    Armas sin retroceso alguno y totalmente descompensadas, texturas y animaciones tan simples que el Counter Strike le da un buen repaso. Los mapas multijugador son enanos, simples y monótonos diseñados para contentar a los niños rata en su carrera a ver quien es el primero en sacarse los prestigios.
    Haber pagado más de 60€ por semejante aberración me hace arrepentirme de haberlo comprado digital (si lo tuviera en físico ya lo tendría a la venta).
    El que quiera jugar a un fps con ambientación clásica que compre el Battlefield 1. Ya está bien de tanto engaño con la serie CoD. Nunca más.    … Expand
  10. TsukasaHiiragi
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    Single player is essentially just more of the same, nothing new or groundbreaking. Some missions are more annoying than others, especially missions requiring stealth can be annoying or even buggy. Multiplayer is a mess, loot boxes in a COD game? Seriously?

    The entire franchise is desperate to add something new, but in the end always settles for focusing on the multiplayer side of    Single player is essentially just more of the same, nothing new or groundbreaking. Some missions are more annoying than others, especially missions requiring stealth can be annoying or even buggy. Multiplayer is a mess, loot boxes in a COD game? Seriously?

    The entire franchise is desperate to add something new, but in the end always settles for focusing on the multiplayer side of the game, which the codtards always eat up.

    Another MAJOR issue is that the tank controls are awful, straight up terrible. It makes for an incredibly difficult and frustrating experience when your tank turns like a slug, gets stuck on scenery and is downright bad - the controls need to be reworked. Another major issue is the hit boxes, they are bad - really really bad, more than a few times on a quick time event you can just blindly fire your gun and miss the target...but it'll still register as a hit/kill.

    I would like to see COD evolve from both a weak single player experience, and a weak multiplayer arena shooter, the logical step would be an open world live war with dynamic missions, drop in/out multiplayer.    … Expand
  11. Defalc0
    Nov 5, 2017
    2
    Multiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that wasMultiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that was ok? the helmets that all players can equip look ridiculous when they are on german soldiers... because they are american GI helmets. ive never played such an immersion breaking (WW2) game. I never have wrote a review on here, but this game pushed all the wrong buttons with me.Seriously, how is World at War STILL a superior game in this day and age. OH YEA, because it wasnt afraid to make you feel uncomfortable, it wasnt afraid to make you uneasy. That game still gives me chills, so dark and so gruesome. Thats the image of war that haunts me. one day this pandering needs to stop.

    The standard issue calling cards DO NOT include flags of nations that actualy faught in the war, instead we have to swallow the image of these LGBT my little furrie flags flying over Normandy. GOD ALMIGHTY, stop with this political **** you are literally killing yourselves with this stuff sledge...
    If i could go back in time only once, I would stop sledgehammer games from ever being part of the call of duty cycle.

    im giving this game 2 points because zombies is actually good, and might only play that.    … Expand
  12. aeuteneuer
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    This game is a complete waste of money. Please, I urge you not to buy; you will be highly disappointed. From the basic non-strategical gameplay to the tiny maps there is not much to enjoy about this game. Compare this to another game with world war two style settings and guns like Battlefield One and there is no comparison. Battlefield One blows Call of Duty World at War out of the water.This game is a complete waste of money. Please, I urge you not to buy; you will be highly disappointed. From the basic non-strategical gameplay to the tiny maps there is not much to enjoy about this game. Compare this to another game with world war two style settings and guns like Battlefield One and there is no comparison. Battlefield One blows Call of Duty World at War out of the water. Call of Duty really let their fans down with this game. I don't like the game play, maps are way too small, small amounts of people in a game (6 Person teams), and on top of that its just not fun. I was not a fan of Call of Duty's last release of Advance Warfare but looking back even that is 100 times better than this new one. I am trying to find something positive to say about it so I will say that their cut scene are very cool and the graphics are amazing but non of that translates into the actual gameplay. The zombies can be fun and seems to be the main selling point of their game because its really the only thing people play. I would highly recommend NOT buying Call of Duty World War II. Instead, If you are looking for a strategic world war II game with big detailed maps and large amount of players in games then, I would Battlefield One. It far surpasses any of its competition at the moment and is an incredibly fun game to play.… Expand
  13. Hecatom
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Just like many others have said before me.
    This game is the culmination of everything bad in the AAA game industry so far.
    The sad part is that as usual the lowest common denominator will keep enabling this kind of practices until is too late.

    Watch how the next Starwars Battlefront 2 will up all the negative aspects of this game and people will eat it gladly.
  14. Mikedee
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    Campaign is great. Zombies good. Multiplayer horrible. Cod ww2 is a AAA game that is treated like a free-to-play game except you pay full price for a game and then to compete you have to buy supply drops. Never again will I support these guys until they quit with the cash grab.
  15. Tubey
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    CoD: WWII goes back to the roots of the series in all the wrong ways possible. Instead of taking the best of what made CoD a smash hit and injecting new life into it, they have cherry picked the same old same old stale nonsense, cobbling together a dated, lifeless single player campaign with every FPS "story mode" trope you care to think of, combined it with the same old same old casualCoD: WWII goes back to the roots of the series in all the wrong ways possible. Instead of taking the best of what made CoD a smash hit and injecting new life into it, they have cherry picked the same old same old stale nonsense, cobbling together a dated, lifeless single player campaign with every FPS "story mode" trope you care to think of, combined it with the same old same old casual multiplayer boredom and dropped in the most bollocks loot box system yet devised by mankind.

    Oh, but the critics love it, don't they? Well, they would, given that most of them reviewed it at a special swanky event held by Activision, closely supervised for their impressions whilst having their every need catered for. "Gaming journalism" indeed; integrity personified. Amazing how that little tidbit of trivia isn't widely publicised eh? Pfft...

    I am convinced people buy this out of habit at this point. I certainly don't buy it, but I think everyone has that one friend who still does because the series made him happy when he was a teenager or something and it's become a drug to them. They tolerate any level of pure crap the series throws at them because they scored that perfect kill 10 years ago and it made them smile.

    Good for them. For the rest of us who can't casually discard our brain, CoD:WWII is a complete waste of time and epitomises every single last thing wrong with this ridiculous industry.    … Expand
  16. id_archer
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    графоний растворился в мыльце...(( и чуство что я в это уже играл не как не покидает меня
  17. Edjin
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    A game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovativeA game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovative ways for players to enjoy the game… Expand
  18. matdevine21
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes. My main problem with this supposed next generation    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes.
    My main problem with this supposed next generation of maps is that they are no different than last gen, where is the dynamic settings? why cant there be a physical changes to the map randomly i.e. a battle on a sinking battleship or a war around you with buildings exploding? its just lazy and derriviative but compared to what Activision charges for season pass / map packs its just insulting!

    Loot crates are obviously there, disgusting to have them opening on normandy batlefield in your "social area" and visable to all, there really isnt an "enough money earned here" is there!

    Overall I feel more down on the franchise now than ever before, it needs to go away and have a high level rethink about COD's future as come next year, COD will not be a pre order or even a day one purchase for me!    … Expand
  19. Aresman
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    I got this game for the SP campaign, but after finishing it in less then 6 h, i can't recommend this game not even on sale at how mediocre the missions were the single mission that i enjoyed and was good from the begging to the end was the Battle of Bulge but even on that the map was almost a copy and paste from united offensive, i wish there was more idk, i mean the D-Day mission onlyI got this game for the SP campaign, but after finishing it in less then 6 h, i can't recommend this game not even on sale at how mediocre the missions were the single mission that i enjoyed and was good from the begging to the end was the Battle of Bulge but even on that the map was almost a copy and paste from united offensive, i wish there was more idk, i mean the D-Day mission only the begging is epic after that all u do is clear bunkers but the way it looks and it's made makes me thing they had a very limited and small budget to make that mission and they wasted too much on the first part and after that they reused same bunker over and over with little change to it and it's things like that that makes the campaign boring and dull, idk how a game that's 12 y old is more epic has more awesome action and bigger then this but idk maybe it's just my opinion and blind by nostalgia, i hope i am.… Expand
  20. Cuberian
    Nov 6, 2017
    3
    You really need an explanation? You saw this black soldier in Germany army in multiplayer ?! No, because it looks like I'm looking through the eyes of myopic
  21. c9sasza
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Lootboxes and trailer from dlc map before game come out? I must say no i sold this after beat campain in 5 hours.Zombie is good but you buy season pass other way you got only one map
  22. AMX121
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    CoD is the primal representation of everything wrong with the game industry. Multiplayer focused, loot boxes, micro-transactions, season pass, dlcs and pay to win **** **** THEM AND EVERYTHING THEY MAKE
  23. DayFul
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    I skipped infinite warfare due to being tired of the tiny maps, Ultra low ttk and terrible connectivity that has been a hallmark of recent COD games. Activision have Blizzard in their back pocket and are still too cheap to use their dedicated servers that ensure Overwatch provides a vastly superior online experience (EA's Battlefiled series also embarasses COD in this area). The game isI skipped infinite warfare due to being tired of the tiny maps, Ultra low ttk and terrible connectivity that has been a hallmark of recent COD games. Activision have Blizzard in their back pocket and are still too cheap to use their dedicated servers that ensure Overwatch provides a vastly superior online experience (EA's Battlefiled series also embarasses COD in this area). The game is simply living off it's name at this point there's zero inspiration it may as well be a sport game with how little improvements are made. It's simply a new coat of paint on what it's a knackered car.… Expand
  24. Jumballi
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Rather than innovate, they simply went back and repackaged the previous game and just took out the super jumps. The only innovation is the fact they made loot boxes more toxic than any game before it.
  25. Dog3117
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    I was stuck between this game and wolfensetin 2, I ended up choosing this one hoping for the replay-ability/longevity factor. Made the cock up of choosing this. BS microtransactions, boring multiplayer, and all round scumbag business ethics by the publisher of this game. This game had a fairly enjoyable campaign, and I did appreciate the attempt and creativity of war mode but these are theI was stuck between this game and wolfensetin 2, I ended up choosing this one hoping for the replay-ability/longevity factor. Made the cock up of choosing this. BS microtransactions, boring multiplayer, and all round scumbag business ethics by the publisher of this game. This game had a fairly enjoyable campaign, and I did appreciate the attempt and creativity of war mode but these are the only 2 positives I see in an otherwise boring soulless cash grab of a 'game'. To y'all giving it a 1 or 0, quit being sheep and be honest, its not a genuine 1 and your the reason this site is nearly completely useless… Expand
  26. Alex1010500
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    Игра, наполненная микротранзакциями и созданная исключительно чтобы только продавать лутбоксы. Молодцы так держать, играйте сами в свою игру.
  27. StanleyFatmax
    Dec 2, 2017
    0
    This game is doodoo.

    I hate most of all, the fact that you get to pick what you look like going into a battle. In the last COD WW2 game, if you were on the side of the Japanese then you wore a Japanese uniform. Same goes for being on the American team, German, Russian and so on... Now, not only do you get to pick what uniform you wear, you also get to pick your gender and ethnicity.    This game is doodoo.

    I hate most of all, the fact that you get to pick what you look like going into a battle. In the last COD WW2 game, if you were on the side of the Japanese then you wore a Japanese uniform. Same goes for being on the American team, German, Russian and so on... Now, not only do you get to pick what uniform you wear, you also get to pick your gender and ethnicity. That is so dumb, imo. For me, it takes away from the feelings of immersion to see a black female in a Wehrmacht uniform. Also, it makes it hard to tell friend from foe.    … Expand
  28. IronTusk
    Nov 21, 2017
    1
    They managed to bring us the most boring and bland collection of multiplayer maps I ever seen in a CoD game. It's a new kind of low.

    It's ass.

    I give this game 11/10 asses because it's much ass.

    It's really just a whole lotta ass. And not the good kind of ass either.
  29. Matttappen
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    By far, the worst call of duty ive ever played. Just terrible in all aspects. I was actually kind of excited about this game but it was such a huge dissapointment. The zombies is okay. If i were to rate the zombie game mode by itself id give it a 6.5. But the multiplayer is honestly terrible.
  30. lufy617_elfo
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game is just **** because it's a copy of battlefield 1 and battlefield 1 is a copy of the 1st world war wich is also a copy of the Carthaginian wars, so it's a copy of greek people.
  31. BlakDak666
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    Call of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am trulyCall of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am truly done with this series for good. I will breakdown the campaign, multiplayer and zombies and give my thoughts on them:

    Campaign - This is easily one of the worst COD campaigns and maybe even worse campaigns as a whole to a game I have ever played. Maybe this is because I'm a history major and researching WW2 as a teen but this genuine trash. The narrative struggles to be either a Band of Brothers style or a over the top action film you'd see from Michael Bay, with explosions and scenes of "loud explosion following ears ringing and dude pulling you on your feet" scattered in too many times. The characters are mostly cardboard cutouts that have no real personality, depth or weight to the situation and their abilities you use in combat are more frustrating and gimmicky than satisfying. The mission variety is typical COD design: boring shooting galleries of killing scores of people with little to no reaction, QTEs and gimmicky additions like tank and plane escorts that don't bring out the full potential it should. The authenticity of WW2 is pretty much trashed; it takes place in 1944-1945, which is invalidating most of the war (in which the first three CODs and World at War did correctly), the Allied forces are largely set aside for the American v.s. Nazis clash and more as gimmicky tokenism of cultures that disrespect their service (despite the opening clearly stating over 50 countries fought and left 65 million dead), characters don't act realistic to the situation, hitmarkers, retreading the same exact structure as other CODs before it. The climax and ending was forced and tonally out of place. It's trash and deserves no love and only scorn. I don't care that people only buy it for the multiplayer; if you put something in your game you want those players to play that in their game. Case closed. 3/10

    Multiplayer- Standard COD multiplayer with a WW2 skin. It wasn't like COD 2 or 3 had great multiplayers anyways, it was COD 4 that put COD on the map in the first place. The game modes are still the same, the division system is pointless as you can pick any gun you want anyways, war mode is weak on operations, the inclusion of PC friendly race and gender options instantly destroys any authenticity this game claims to have, a **** hub world copy and paste from Destiny, loot boxes that fall from the sky and promote gambling and skinner box mentality that is abhorrent and should be scorned deeply. I suppose if you play with friends there can be some fun to be had and it feels more grounded compared to the last entries, but it doesn't do anything new that is concerning and by my fifth match I was already bored and wanted to play something else. Also add connectivity issues at launch and you got a fine example of a rushed product. 4/10

    Zombies- Usually my favorite mode COD ever has and in some ways is the best to date. I like some of the changes made to the design of the game, but I unfortunately couldn't help to feel that it is too easy (as a vet of zombies since 2008). The characters aren't interesting and boring; their constant breathing and gasping becomes grating and annoying after awhile. The zombies themselves lose their dark charm quickly and their voicework makes them goofier than what should be (since I thought this was going to be a far more edgier zombies). Loot boxes in this mode is pointless and extremely ****. With it being easy and being able to get to high rounds with little challenge, I honestly felt bored and wall guns are just powerful as mystery box guns, completely making it pointless to use. The most disappointing part is each past zombies game (WAW and the Black Op series) had ideas that never got here despite being worth the inclusion. The human like models of WAW, the extra maps from BO1, the passive perks you get and the bank system in BO2 and gumballs in BO3 all could have been in this game, but isnt. The single map at launch is insulting and even with friends it can only last so long before you get bored. Decent overall. 6/10

    The game will have microtransactions, has a season pass and generally feels like 'another Call of Duty', no matter if it returns to its roots or not. I am sick and tired of this series, the greed behind it and the stupid masses (myself included) who buy these games anymore and pass it off as dudebro topics. I gave COD a chance and after a decade, it's time to throw in the towel for any hope for the series. COD definitely has found its roots, but to grow a big nasty parasite of a plant instead of the hopeful tree of originality and charm. 4/10 overall. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME.    … Expand
  32. TheOnlyHopee
    Nov 13, 2017
    0
    este juego no sirve todo con microtransacciones es una cagada danando todo lo que es COD mardita empresa sigan defiendo estas mierdas porque no son sinceros y dicen lo que enrealidad es
  33. Rembo
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Sorry for my english. How do dear critics of various gaming editions put this game 9-10 points? Are you crazy? "Apparently, they got a good salary from the creators of the game." There is nothing interesting in this game! The BLACK OPS series is 10 points! Missing confidence in the ratings of critics! Only users' opinions can be trusted!
  34. willsmichael964
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    Let me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into theLet me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into the FPS genre with classic titles like Goldeneye and Perfect Dark. Call of Duty launched (many years later), and wow what a fantastic beginning to a franchise! Epic multiplayer and short yet powerful campaigns. It almost seemed like it would never stop either, every year a new COD would launch and it was a must have! Suddenly it seemed like it started to falter. It went from a perspective I understood to double jumping and running along the walls; flying through the air with jet packs.. Needless to say I wasn't much of a fan and only bought the new franchise titles when they were on sale or at a killer discount. Even then... After playing Ghosts, I realized the franchise had completely fallen into disarray and I converted my attention more into the battlefield franchise. I played Infinite Warfare with a friend and almost couldn't physically do it. Another COD failure. I should have known better. Then alas! A "boots on the ground" Call of Duty! Could this be a rebirth of a once great franchise!? Could this be another great title; reminiscent of the original Black Ops 1?? How exciting! I had to go out and get it on launch day! Nov 3rd! I had high hopes and hadn't bought a COD title in years. I dove right into multiplayer and tested every available weapon I could. It had a renewed feeling and I was excited. For 20 minutes. Then the endorphins settled and I took note to aspects of the game that became more evident. Like why do I keep playing the same 2 or 3 maps over and over? why is everyone running around with SMGs? Why is every map so small and contained? I quickly started to feel like I spent 59.99 for a few hours of enjoyment, and that afterwards, this game would sit on the shelf with the dozen or so other titles I have that rarely played in the last 6 months or so, and as I sit here typing, that is where CODWW2 sits. In the case, on my shelf, next to The Wolf Among Us. I anticipate that is where it will stay, while Battlefield 1 sits pretty in my Playstation. Mark my words, this WILL be the last COD game that I purchase, and I implore you to not make the same mistake that I did. Now I sit, eagerly awaiting the next Battlefield installment, but even if that takes years, Battlefield 1 will still satisfy me more than CODWW2 ever could.… Expand
  35. beardedwarrior1
    Nov 12, 2017
    3
    A good solid base, completely and utterly ruined by dreadful programming, connections and server issues. After putting a solid 20+hours into the game, around 5 in single player and 15+ in multiplayer I can honestly say "save your money", i'm quite regretting purchasing the game myself. When the game is fun, it is great (Mainly when playing with friends), however, it constantly disconnectsA good solid base, completely and utterly ruined by dreadful programming, connections and server issues. After putting a solid 20+hours into the game, around 5 in single player and 15+ in multiplayer I can honestly say "save your money", i'm quite regretting purchasing the game myself. When the game is fun, it is great (Mainly when playing with friends), however, it constantly disconnects you from your party, from games, halfway through games, when the game ends, when the game begins. Gives you loading screens that last in excess of 20 minutes. Black screens that you can not back out of, therefore making you reset the game completely. No dedicated servers. No host migration (it simply ends the game if the host leaves). Completely empty HQ thanks to **** connections, so you cant complete some of the challenges e.g. give 50 commendations to other players. The game is shipped out with the bare minimum when it comes to maps and variation, probably waiting to release more maps via season pass (as if we didn't realise Activision is money hungry already). The maps they give us are very poorly designed and thought out, because playing as a black, female Nazi in the London Docks was somehow going to make sense. In the last 2 hours of gameplay alone I have been disconnected/kicked/black screen'd at least 17 times. Party members have been thrown into random games not with the party and if that wasn't infuriating enough when we joined the game, the remaining 3 party members where split 2/1 on the teams, fantastic right?

    Honestly, if you are REALLY interested in the single player campaign (which lasts maybe 5 hours) then wait for a sale and then get it, or at best lend/rent it from somewhere. This game is not worth the £49 asking price. Not by a long shot, unless they get their fingers out their ass and fix the myriad of problems it currently has.    … Expand
  36. KpblcoLLoB
    Nov 15, 2017
    0
    Этот кусок деньгоотнимающего говна не должен существовать. Не позволяйте зажравшимся ААА издателям иметь вас. Голосуйте рублем,
  37. ManOfChap
    Nov 17, 2017
    2
    "BOOTS ON THE GROUND" what a load of nonsense. This is another copy and paste CoD game. Campaign is absolutely awful. Zombies is decent but 1 map is not worth it. MP is lacking and the EXACT SAME for years now.
  38. BorderlineBunk
    Nov 7, 2017
    4
    I gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when gamesI gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when games like BF1 are just burying them in quality. This isn't even a Battlefield fanboy over here. I've been with COD since COD 2, but its blatantly obvious that they don't care about making a fun UNIQUE experience anymore and its just about **** on this years version of another subpar game. God just give up COD this is the nail in the coffin of the series for me. So done with their ****… Expand
  39. CaptainPuGDoG
    Nov 16, 2017
    4
    Spend 50+ hours
    Story 2/10 So stuipid history,where Great America try to win war,a lot of hero doing dont many actions don't make sense,just 2 or 3 interesting missions, all other is a ****
    Mp 5/10 After 10 or 15 hours,play it is very boring and there is not any interest
  40. mikepatyaev
    Nov 17, 2017
    4
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  41. Smoda
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby.When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby. There are many signs of laziness in this game and it feels like a cash grab.… Expand
  42. evani
    Nov 8, 2017
    3
    if you care at all about multiplayer then do not buy this cod, 9 maps 4 of which are decent the rest are average at best! the game play is also terrible combined with minimal gun management and perk customization, possibly the worst CoD MP i have ever played.
  43. millerjr9566
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    Seriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The onlySeriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The only positive outcome of this game was they got rid of those exo-skeleton jet packs.… Expand
  44. Hanbarku
    Nov 14, 2017
    4
    best call of duty in a long time. unfortunately loot boxes drop from the sky on the beaches of normandy no less. do they have any shame anymore. at least its cosmetic. 4/10. no more loot boxes
  45. parham76
    Nov 15, 2017
    4
    I wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machineI wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machine gun/shot gun classes unplayable for those with strong connections. I *have* to use long range assault rifles and even then, I *have* to be viewing down scope before someone is in sight to stand a chance. Ever wanted to know what it feels like to consistently prone down in a corner half covered by a wall waiting for someone to round a corner(not because you're a camper, but because you *have* to camp) and then when they do, they STILL manage to zoom down their scope at you and fire 3 shots before you get to fire one, and then in the replay that half second you saw them before being shot was actually a full 1-2 seconds? Then play this.… Expand
  46. hectortheboss
    Apr 27, 2018
    0
    this game isnt a call of duty. Is a comercial product. Activision are changing to Ea. dont buy his games if you are a fan of the old saga of call of duty
  47. MaxieZeus
    Sep 20, 2022
    3
    Same **** with a ww2 skin, gun-play doesn't feel any different from other games and they didn't even try to make this game historically accurate.
  48. iamevilhomer
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol. Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol.

    Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough research and have seen that the game is as I had expected. Trash... But hey... We smart people all saw this coming. We knew it was going to suck lol. Just another terrible cod game with the WW2 paint coat put on.

    Short 6 hour campaign that's not very historically accurate as advertised. Also has dumb AI and glitches on top of stuttering issues many have been reporting.

    Game also has micro transactions which automatically knocks the game down several points.

    Lobbies and load times are totally garbage in this game. Dead zone issues with aiming have been reported multiple times.

    Trash maps that are very few with many guns missing that I'm sure will be released over time through dlc/micro transaction horse **** and butt ****ery...

    Here's the funniest thing of all... Apparently the ps4 version is working better than the xbox one version. The xbox one version was unplayable for the first few days of launch for most xbox one folk... At least the online multiplayer part. So why is the ps4 version getting a slightly lower metacritic critic score by the critics???? Lol whatever... Maybe it's got something to do with that over priced and pretty much useless for gamers console known as the xbox one x? Who knows who cares...

    There are other problems but I don't care to remember them right now. I'm just caring enough to do this review for laughs and for the good of gaming. DON'T buy jokes of a game like this one. They exist to rob you blind and leave you with nothing but frustration. You people should honestly know this by now. I mean for ****s sake... It's cod... It's crap division... It's supposed to suck lol.

    Decent visuals though... Lets not let this review be all negativity... Gotta give credit where it's due I suppose... Just to be fair and nice : )

    Even without many of the problems I listed though... It's still just trashy cod at the end of the day so I would still give it a low score lolz.    … Expand
  49. xismius
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    El juego no está mal pero el problema más gordo ahora de lanzamiento es que no se puede ni jugar de la cantidad de bugs que hay sobretodo con el tema de la conectividad, el juego ahora mismo está roto, por lo demás yo lo veo un juego bastante decente, no diré de los mejores de la saga, pero pasable e infinitamente superior a los anteriores aunque eso tampoco es muy difícil viendo el nivelEl juego no está mal pero el problema más gordo ahora de lanzamiento es que no se puede ni jugar de la cantidad de bugs que hay sobretodo con el tema de la conectividad, el juego ahora mismo está roto, por lo demás yo lo veo un juego bastante decente, no diré de los mejores de la saga, pero pasable e infinitamente superior a los anteriores aunque eso tampoco es muy difícil viendo el nivel de los ultimos años.… Expand
  50. Keitha313
    Jun 1, 2018
    4
    Just keeping the review short and sweet.
    P.S. don't listen to the positive reviews they're just having you on trust me!
    Graphically the game isn't anything special, for a triple A title that had 3 years to work on the game they really dropped the ball big time on this! Gameplay wise, it's your usual COD minus wall running, boost jumping which isn't a bad thing when the game actually    Just keeping the review short and sweet.
    P.S. don't listen to the positive reviews they're just having you on trust me!

    Graphically the game isn't anything special, for a triple A title that had 3 years to work on the game they really dropped the ball big time on this!

    Gameplay wise, it's your usual COD minus wall running, boost jumping which isn't a bad thing when the game actually works, yes, that's right the game runs like total crap!
    The game suffers from so many wtf moments of how did I die, why does my gun seem like its doing less damage than his and this isn't just me saying this I've seen big Youtuber/Twitch players say the exact same thing!
    The lack of proper servers and the problematic lag compensator really screw this game up couple all of that with the fact the game matches people from across the world to play in lobbies, seriously how is that even happening!!

    Authenticity next, do they deliver? HELL NO they don't! Guns have terrible fake animations, it's just incredibly lazy, for an example when you shoot one bullet from the KAR98k and you go to reload instead of putting a single bullet in the character puts an entire stripper clip into the gun and they even put an entire stripper clip into the gun when you only have 1 bullet left in reserve, it's just absolutely laughable!
    Guns have no recoil they all shoot like damn lasers, snipers are just a one-hit kill from any range which just makes them the total unskilled weapon of many peoples choice.

    Then zombies... oh my god!!
    Making something easier isn't making it better, the zombies are basically invisible, yes they run faster, but it's so damn easy to avoid them you can run through them essentially and the map complexity is nil, void, there is no complexity or teamwork required so props to Sledgehammer on that *slow clap*...

    Finally, the story, it's a good war experience it displays some epic moments, nice change up of gameplay requiring health packs instead of regenerating health, but the story is far too short and lacks the same storytelling level that Treyarch brought to such a high standard.

    Overall, It's maybe not as low as I scored it, but the game is such a huge let down that I had to score it this way, so much for a short and sweet review.    … Expand
  51. JasonBaureBond
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    WW2 is back that mean no jumping jets and other futuristic nonsense. Gameplay is good there could be more maps but everyting is good.
    Sory but women dont belong to this it s painfull to watch and listen them.
  52. AstartesXVI
    Nov 13, 2017
    0
    DO NOT BUY! I lost $65 on this horrid pile of trash, so inaccurate in it's portrayal of world war II it makes inglorious basterds look like real history. The multi player is pointless garbage, it's idiotic.
    Trash-hammer games have managed to make "boots on the ground in world war II" feel like some bizarre alternate reality where black females are fighting for the Nazis and shovel's rule    DO NOT BUY! I lost $65 on this horrid pile of trash, so inaccurate in it's portrayal of world war II it makes inglorious basterds look like real history. The multi player is pointless garbage, it's idiotic.
    Trash-hammer games have managed to make "boots on the ground in world war II" feel like some bizarre alternate reality where black females are fighting for the Nazis and shovel's rule the field of battle. Haha what a bad joke this game is, COD IS DEAD.

    Will be trading my copy in to deny the filth known as activision a sale.    … Expand
  53. clone901
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    This game is broken and the d day is not as good as medial of honor. the multiplayer is boring and the guns sound like paintball guns. this game is a terrible and boring just buy iw,bo3 or bo2
  54. xxxsssjjjk
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The campaign is about 1 hour long, the multiplayer only comes with 9 maps!!! and zombies only has 1 map. The graphics suck and the guns are unrealisitic and sound fake. The game is not worth 60 dollars wait until its on sale or buy battlefield 1.
  55. ProGamerbf1
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Very bad game. The maps are have tight cornors so the only gun you can use is an smg. The hit detection is off and the game is just like infinite warfare but with no jump packs. Plus the servers have been down every time I try to play it, if you are looking for boots on the ground get Modern Warfare Remastered. It is just as good as the origional.
  56. Sworld
    Nov 9, 2017
    0
    This game is an EPIC FAIL for me. Why this game dont have lolal multiplayer for 4 players???? It is made for playstation 4 and if you dont know dear developers... playstation 4 have 4 controllers !!!
    We were looking forward for this game with my friends .... and now we cant play together. It is stupid. Why some COD has 4 players local.... some not, some yes, some not..... PLEASE FINALLY    This game is an EPIC FAIL for me. Why this game dont have lolal multiplayer for 4 players???? It is made for playstation 4 and if you dont know dear developers... playstation 4 have 4 controllers !!!
    We were looking forward for this game with my friends .... and now we cant play together. It is stupid. Why some COD has 4 players local.... some not, some yes, some not..... PLEASE FINALLY DECIDE WHAT GAME DO YOU WANT TO DO !!!!    … Expand
  57. Jedimaster007
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    R.I.P Call of Duty.

    I was really looking forward to this game because of all the media-fed hype. IMO wasted my money on this lame excuse for a game. There is nothing new here to see.... "please move along". You can see that they have completely run out of any new ideas: instead opted to create a lame game with heavy overtones of Battlefield 1 (which is a good game). This game is    R.I.P Call of Duty.

    I was really looking forward to this game because of all the media-fed hype. IMO wasted my money on this lame excuse for a game.
    There is nothing new here to see.... "please move along". You can see that they have completely run out of any new ideas: instead opted to create a lame game with heavy overtones of Battlefield 1 (which is a good game).

    This game is simply a cash-cow for Activision: a guarantee'd earner: micro-transaction hell.

    In multiplayer: the graphics are pretty dismal. The maps nothing new. Weapons boring. I'm trying really hard to think of anything that impressed me.

    On day of release the servers were running really slow. Sometimes we waited 5 minutes+ to get into a match. One thing in particular that I found annoying was the 'Headquarters' a place where all online gamers congregate prior to finding a match - more like a pen to contain the sheep.

    I have bought and played all of the Call of Duty games since CoD 4 and watched as Activision have run out of ideas and produced lesser titles. I honestly didn't think anything could have been a greater disappointment than Infinite Warfare. This is.

    The reality is a group of 6 of us - gamers who loved playing CoD were talking about trading the game in on day 2 of release really puts it in perspective.

    If you enjoy FPS don't waste your money on this pile of tripe. If we keep buying this junk and filling their purses without saying how it really is then this is the end of gaming. :)

    Have a nice day.    … Expand
  58. ResQ2
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Played the single player campaign. Absolutely pointless quick time events and the most bland missions i've never seen. absolutely standard cod, nothing special. The graphics could easily be from 2010 too. Definitely worse campaign than the "future settings" ones - and those were already pretty bad.
  59. swagerx
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Just close the series already . Its just getting worse. Quick tip : IF YOU EVER TRY TO DO A HISTORICAL GAME , **** LEARD HISTORY , DUMB **** .The last enjoyable / playable CoD was Black Ops 1 . Everything after it is just trash.
  60. eYeArr
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    I got this game on day one, the best thing so far is amazon delivery service, lets point out some stuff:

    Negative The size of the installation is HUGE Connecting to play day 1, 2 3, was impossible After it managed to connect the view of the guns is awful, when you have 2,3 4 games with other optics it really sucks. The teams respawn on the same side almost all the game its all so    I got this game on day one, the best thing so far is amazon delivery service, lets point out some stuff:

    Negative
    The size of the installation is HUGE
    Connecting to play day 1, 2 3, was impossible
    After it managed to connect the view of the guns is awful, when you have 2,3 4 games with other optics it really sucks.
    The teams respawn on the same side almost all the game its all so lineal, what makes camping the most common thing.
    Killing its hard dying is easy
    The zombie mode is boring and you get 10000000 points of life, it gets so boring after round 15
    The maps are really with good texture but not enjoyable

    Goods
    Maps graphics
    Campaign

    I am selling or returning this game, it really sucks I am very very dissapointed.    … Expand
  61. fakkel
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Worse Cod game ever! Multiplayer= head glitching, Shoot first die first, Weapons with now weight behind them, poorly designed maps made for campers. GG well played
  62. lega_lol
    Nov 17, 2017
    0
    instead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up forinstead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badly… Expand… Expand
  63. Sikver91
    Nov 8, 2017
    3
    una literal mierda de juego ahora con sus cajitas y sin emocion en el multijugador no hay miedo a morir, cheaters y hacks por todo lado servidores caidos un juego de una nota por ahy de 3 por mucho a 4 y esta en 8 ? es una broma ? que basura de juego
  64. Bossuk
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    the single player is not bad as far as COd games goes, much better than infinite warfare.
    But the Multiplayer is the worset i have ever seen with multiple server crashes, huge delays in joining games, huge delays in getting a map started, and the whole orders implementation is manged badly.
    COD is a multiplayer game, and Activision have really messed up. I've played every COD and got    the single player is not bad as far as COd games goes, much better than infinite warfare.
    But the Multiplayer is the worset i have ever seen with multiple server crashes, huge delays in joining games, huge delays in getting a map started, and the whole orders implementation is manged badly.

    COD is a multiplayer game, and Activision have really messed up. I've played every COD and got everyone on launch day, but what ias the point if you can't play thay game!!!!

    Awful. Don't buy until they promise to invest in the MP.    … Expand
  65. UncutSuspiria
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    80 gigabytes of garbage.

    I have hated COD since BLOPS2. As soon as it turned into Halo, I started hating it. But, I was really looking forward to this one because it was going back to their roots. This is 80 gigs of trash. I sold it less than owning it for 24 hours. Campaign: SUCKS. This is NOT a campaign. It is only 5 hours long. I am sorry, but a campaign should not take 5 hours    80 gigabytes of garbage.

    I have hated COD since BLOPS2. As soon as it turned into Halo, I started hating it. But, I was really looking forward to this one because it was going back to their roots.

    This is 80 gigs of trash. I sold it less than owning it for 24 hours.

    Campaign: SUCKS. This is NOT a campaign. It is only 5 hours long. I am sorry, but a campaign should not take 5 hours to beat. I have purchased DLC content greater than that.

    Multiplayer: TERRIBLE. COD continues to use the same gaming engine from 2007 and it shows in the graphics, they are terrible. Gameplay and movement is horrible. You are constantly swaying side-to-side which was intentional to give it that feel of really walking, it failed. Aiming is choppy as well. Above all that, the thing that really destroys COD is the community. You still have the same people playing that ruin the game. This game requires no skill, you can pick it up and get 15 kills without trying. People either hide or run around aimlessly like morons.

    Zombies: Didn't even play. I was so displeased with everything else that I sold the game not even 24 hours later.

    Lootboxes: These are NOT pay to win, they are cosmetic crap only.

    I really wanted to like this game so much.    … Expand
  66. mackenzie129
    Nov 9, 2017
    3
    Read before you downvote
    I hate that I'm going to get down-voted to hell for rating it so low, But honestly lets be real I'm a call of duty fan boy bought it every release. I try to be fair to games never rating them in red unless they are broken or a rip off. I like many people bought it on the psn store so no tax yay...but now i cannot return it boo..... A lot of people my dumbass    Read before you downvote
    I hate that I'm going to get down-voted to hell for rating it so low, But honestly lets be real I'm a call of duty fan boy bought it every release. I try to be fair to games never rating them in red unless they are broken or a rip off. I like many people bought it on the psn store so no tax yay...but now i cannot return it boo..... A lot of people my dumbass included thought it'd be W.a.W2 (It is not)

    Pros
    -Campaign is good return to form
    -Zombies is fun
    -WW2
    -Graphically it inst shiet
    -When your team actually works together War mode is fun
    -Headquarters is neat

    Cons
    -Multiplayer is broken (Spawns, Finding matches, Contracts, Guns)
    -Multiplayer maps are honestly ****
    -Campaign can easily be beaten in one sitting
    -Zombies is overly convoluted
    -Multiplayer is unbelievably broken
    -BS deaths in the campaign

    I don't care about the supply drops they are in every game seriously if you're rating it low for that shut the **** up. The playing as black people and women in the MP who ****ing cares, The iron crosses in Campaign who cares?! Yeah I wouldve liked it if the Nazi army had swastikas but whatever its no bother. Fan boys accept that its not perfect get off the 10s Haters accept that its a game out there that people enjoy get off your 0s. So much hype so much disappointment.
    When they fix the actual broken things my rating will go up    … Expand
  67. Klayer44
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The last Call of Duty game I purchased was MW2. I have tried each game since, but not parted with my money because I thought 'if I keep paying them they will think it's okay to keep producing this copy/paste detritus'.

    Maybe this time there would be improvements, genuinely well thought out ideas that added value to the game. I had a weekend to kill and a few friends were buying so I    The last Call of Duty game I purchased was MW2. I have tried each game since, but not parted with my money because I thought 'if I keep paying them they will think it's okay to keep producing this copy/paste detritus'.

    Maybe this time there would be improvements, genuinely well thought out ideas that added value to the game.
    I had a weekend to kill and a few friends were buying so I joined in and I wish I hadn't bothered.

    The campaign is somehow worse than the most recent transformers, and most recent fast/furious films,and that's just the story and voice acting.
    The most frustrating element is the illusion breaking invisible walls and magic shields that force the player to do tasks in exactly the way the developer planned.
    This is fine for certain games, but when the illusion of choice is given to you, and then for no logical reason and without explanation is taken away; forcing you to start at the last checkpoint, it's offensive, it's lazy and it's not acceptable for a AAA title.

    Minor (and even a few mission failing) bugs could be forgiven if the above wasn't true and coupled with this title's cream of the crop price tag. Something HAS to change.

    Whilst the multiplayer is better than the campaign, it too has seen very very little innovation unless you include the headquarters lobby which I don't as it isn't game play. The illusion of being surrounded by players does not create an atmosphere as there is very little you can do to interact with each other and no one bought the game to socialise with random players.

    Same old copy paste create a class system with only superficial changes. Same old bulletproof hedges, invisible map walls funneling players into one of seven(not several) engagement positions on each map. Same old grind, fast twitch no scope, zero strategy , low team cooperation as the last 8 COD derivatives.

    And FINE. I might be able to forget all this and just sip my BUY&LARGE cup cake in a cup and play..

    IF I COULD CONNECT TO THE ONLINE SERVERS MORE THAN 1/20 TIMES.

    Obviously don't buy it, but I did so I won't blame you. We need to stop giving battlefield/battlefront/cod/fifa our money and start demanding a better product from them than a repackaging. We need to change the game, so we can change the game.    … Expand
  68. PolleDK
    Nov 7, 2017
    3
    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and to make it a lot worse the main story Glorifies the American Perverted vision on themselves in WW 2
    And whats up with all this STRONG independent Woman in games now a days!??! i can understand the women in the resistance but in the British special forces??? give me a break from all this feminist ****    … Expand
  69. Turbodowg
    Jan 6, 2018
    1
    Cod WW2 is IMO one of the worst in the entire series along side Ghosts and Blops 2 and 3. It is basically broken.
    I have no idea what they've done to the servers but for the past two weeks they no longer work. The lag is game breaking and completely destroys all the fun. It makes the game a frustrating mess. Nearly every game I play I see the enemy first, unload a full clip into them    Cod WW2 is IMO one of the worst in the entire series along side Ghosts and Blops 2 and 3. It is basically broken.
    I have no idea what they've done to the servers but for the past two weeks they no longer work. The lag is game breaking and completely destroys all the fun. It makes the game a frustrating mess. Nearly every game I play I see the enemy first, unload a full clip into them getting 10 hit markers while they kill with one bullet. Even playing with steady aim and firing from the hip doesn't work, as soon as you see an enemy -as you are pulling the trigger- you are dead. On the rare occasion you will beast but sadly knowing it's because everyone else is lagging. Sometimes it hilarious; like when I came up behind a camper facing the opposite direction, unleashed a series of bullets into his head only for him to suddenly teleport around and quick scope me. Sometimes you could cry - like the round I played and went 0.20 because not a single bullet from any weapon would register.

    I switched back to IW and there I was, top of every game pulling high scores and low deaths. No other game I own lags like COD WW2. Battlefield runs perfect, Overwatch runs perfect, COD IW runs perfect, COD 4 remaster runs perfect yet WW2 is like playing on a 46k modem.

    The social hub is still a ghost town which they haven't bothered to fix, but made sure they added COD Points to buy loot crates!

    Maps are a mess, badly designed and boring. There's next to no content.

    The war maps are actually pretty fun and for some bizarre reason don't lag anywhere near as much as the standard maps, but there's only 3 of them!

    With the season pass you get a remastered map from COD2 which is insulting considering they didn't give enough maps with the main game, no doubt it was removed simply to entice people to buy the season pass.

    Basically it doesn't work, we should all be refunded for paying for a product that is basically in alpha stage still.

    Worst Cod in the history of cod. Avoid at all costs.

    ....................................................

    Update 06.01.18
    Two months after launch I have deleted COD WW2. The servers are completely broken to a point where it is now impossible to play. Lag com, poor hit detection, teleportation and spawns are destroying any fun that could have been had. Every game is a constant frustration and doing well is not based on skill but if you have lag comp for or against you. It's beyond frustrating to shoot first, get 12 hit markers and die to see in your kill cam you haven't even fired a bullet. This is officially the worst COD in the entire history of COD. It's a cheap rushed bare bones mess.    … Expand
  70. WorstNovak
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game is unfettered **** Sledgehammer Games is incompetent and I personally will never buy anything they touch ever again. The servers are unstable and **** the hit detection is functionally non-existent, the weapon balance is bad, the maps are boring and there's only 9 of them, the list goes on and on and on. Do not buy this game.
  71. njustcritic
    Nov 14, 2017
    1
    Достаточно посмотреть несколько отзывов пользователей, просто без слов всё итак с этой игрой понятно, не пойму никогда людей которые предпочтут купить калду, вместо очень годного шутера на рынке взять даже BF1. Всё осталось на прежнем уровне, ладно если бы этот уровень был велик и все бы восприняли игру как 5-6/10. Но всё как и было плохо всё плохо и осталось, денег своих это игра точно неДостаточно посмотреть несколько отзывов пользователей, просто без слов всё итак с этой игрой понятно, не пойму никогда людей которые предпочтут купить калду, вместо очень годного шутера на рынке взять даже BF1. Всё осталось на прежнем уровне, ладно если бы этот уровень был велик и все бы восприняли игру как 5-6/10. Но всё как и было плохо всё плохо и осталось, денег своих это игра точно не стоит советую всем пройти мимо или лучше купить Battlefield 1… Expand
  72. CyclePlus
    Nov 10, 2017
    4
    Game is trash. Campaign is around 5 hours and is a fairly standard corridor shooter with nothing memorable that comes to mind in regards to the storyline or characters. It basically plays like an fps from 2003 but with fancier graphics.

    Multiplayer is where the ineptitude of Activation and Sledgehammer really shines through though. MP is a bug filled, lagging mess full of hit-markers    Game is trash. Campaign is around 5 hours and is a fairly standard corridor shooter with nothing memorable that comes to mind in regards to the storyline or characters. It basically plays like an fps from 2003 but with fancier graphics.

    Multiplayer is where the ineptitude of Activation and Sledgehammer really shines through though. MP is a bug filled, lagging mess full of hit-markers that don't kill your enemies due to Activision's refusal to implement dedicated servers and one of the most counter intuitive menu systems of all time. The perk system in this game is pretty much non-existent and there are only 9 maps available which are all uninspired 3 route camper fests and a chore to play.

    The only reason anyone even likes this game is because the previous three titles in this franchise set the bar so astronomical low that something as asinine as boots on the ground game play seems refreshing to the fanboys who waste their money on this game year after year.    … Expand
  73. bmc87
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    Single player campaign is alright but nothing special. My biggest beef is the tired old graphics engine that looks basically the same as BO1. It's 2017, these graphics are unaccetable. I don't have a problem with twitch shooters or lack of realism but good lord, visually this game is not good.
  74. merengueti
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    la verdad que el juego es un copia pega con algunas texturas cambiadas y poco mas, aparte el sistema de loot que la gente no quiere, lo han implementado para intentar engachar a la gente a los micropagos con sus politicas abusivas. te has lucido activision
  75. 1983Electric
    Nov 22, 2017
    4
    Campaign player here. I felt like all the cool stories happened with World at War, and then they had to try and come up with other things that just weren't as interesting; too short. Also.. you play as a girl trying to deliver a briefcase for a level. The graphics were really nice though.
  76. Euknowia
    Nov 5, 2017
    4
    Another prosaic iteration in the COD series fulfilling the expectations of most – although the loot crates add a nice sinister touch (not to mention alluring players to the insidious and addictive temptation of gambling by incentivizing an exhibition of the virtually vain where lottery rewards are braggingly presented to varying onlookers assuring critics that Activision is indeed takingAnother prosaic iteration in the COD series fulfilling the expectations of most – although the loot crates add a nice sinister touch (not to mention alluring players to the insidious and addictive temptation of gambling by incentivizing an exhibition of the virtually vain where lottery rewards are braggingly presented to varying onlookers assuring critics that Activision is indeed taking steps on realizing their daunting casino dream through a system which they so modestly patented).
    - The campaign is too short, although decent, forgettable.
    - Game modes are banal (big surprise), done much better in alternative games of the same genre
    - Zombies are still fairly entertaining to play with friends, but the game mode is quite like the nature of a zombie – lifeless, often pedestrian, and mostly uninspired.

    This time around, I’d say COD is lower than mediocre. I absolutely encourage waiting for a price drop (unless you absolutely adore COD multiplayer/zombies).    … Expand
  77. NeoReaper
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    The campaign should be nominated for an Oscar. Zombies is alright. The Multiplayer is yet again another **** show. The graphics are really bad(PS4 Pro). It's like the game has a very hard time to figure out what to focus on which leaves blurring everywhere.

    Metacritic needs to figure out away to tell if someone has actually played the game instead of letting the BF kiddies come one here    The campaign should be nominated for an Oscar. Zombies is alright. The Multiplayer is yet again another **** show. The graphics are really bad(PS4 Pro). It's like the game has a very hard time to figure out what to focus on which leaves blurring everywhere.

    Metacritic needs to figure out away to tell if someone has actually played the game instead of letting the BF kiddies come one here and just review bomb it.    … Expand
  78. Xalon
    Nov 7, 2017
    1
    They screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game aThey screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game a chance? Pass on this at all costs.… Expand
  79. FluffyBunnyBro
    Mar 10, 2018
    4
    Call of Duty WWII is a solid game, though it has MANY flaws. But before we get to the heart and soul of the game, the multiplayer, lets talk about the campaign.

    THE CAMPAIGN: It's pretty good, one of the better in the series, and the first one I've actually played all the way through since BO2. This campaign is a lot of the same stuff, but it feels more engaging because of the WW2    Call of Duty WWII is a solid game, though it has MANY flaws. But before we get to the heart and soul of the game, the multiplayer, lets talk about the campaign.

    THE CAMPAIGN:
    It's pretty good, one of the better in the series, and the first one I've actually played all the way through since BO2. This campaign is a lot of the same stuff, but it feels more engaging because of the WW2 setting, and shooting Nazis with iconic WW2 guns was pretty cool. The characters were okay, they were a bit flat, but at least there was something here. They felt like flat characters, but they were still characters, which is more than I can say about some of the other games. Overall, it was a Call of Duty campaign, and if you enjoyed the other game's campaigns, you'll enjoy this one. If you're not a fan, I would still recommend trying it, as it makes some improvements I really like, like being able to request ammo, and meds from squad mates. It was pretty good for a CoD campaign, but nothing amazing.

    THE MULTIPLAYER:
    Oh, where do I start.
    First off, the good: The gameplay is fun, and it does feel more like the older Call of Dutys without the jetpacks and all that crap. It's pretty fast paced, but I found the gunplay pretty satisfying and the overall gameplay just pretty fun. Also, in this game they introduced a new mode, War, and put simply, its a blast. It's basically Battlefield's rush but in Call of Duty. You have to make it through a few objectives while the other team tries to stop you. I really like it, and hope to see it return in future titles. Yeah, so gameplay is pretty good.
    And now, the bad: This game had the WORST launch in all of CoD history. The first 2-3 days I couldn't even get into a multiplayer. It finally started working for me, but it's still a bit shaky, sometimes lagging, or taking longer than it should to find a match. Other people have been getting it worse than me, and apparently can't get into a match even now. This is unacceptable for a $60 AAA game. Also, Headquarters is an epic fail. Currently, it is impossible to get into headquarters with another player, which is the whole point. Your stuck wandering around by yourself. Some achievements even require you to do things with other players, which is hard to do WHEN THERE'S NO OTHER GODDAMN PLAYERS!!!! I also just hate the idea in general, I just wanna get into a game and shoot some dudes while blasting classic rock in the background (Please tell me I'm not the only one who does that). But I don't give a s*** about "Social Score" and doing stuff in the headquarters. Why not just put all that stuff in menus? Anyways, now that I've covered some launch issues, lets cover things about the game's fundamental mechanics. Divisions is a stupid system. When they said they were "going back to their roots" I didn't think they meant they were legit going back and removing some of the great innovative features of the recent CoDs. This system was a complete step back from the pick-10 system. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Sledgehammer said this one would feature more customization than ever before, which is just a flat out lie. In fact, it''s the opposite of the truth. There's less customization options for your classes in this one.
    This game is also lacking some iconic WW2 weapons. For example. the Sten, it was promised before the game launched, but it's nowhere to be seen. The Mosin Nagant, perhaps the most iconic sniper of the war, is completely absent from the game. We're also missing the Gewehr 43. This game doesn't feature a revolver of any kind either, which is most perplexing of all. Revolvers are such an iconic part of any war, I don't see why they wouldn't bother to include one in the multiplayer. Especially because there's one featured briefly in the campaign. They programmed the model and all the animations but didn't put it in the multiplayer?
    And finally, black female Nazis. Just, why. NOBODY would have complained if women weren't in the game. It's almost disrespectful to all the men who fought and died in the war. Even more stupid, is that you couldn't play as a female soldier in Infinite Warfare, a game taking place a few hundred years in the future, in freaking space for crying out loud. Nope, no females in that but WW2, yup, put women in it. Wtf?
    And finally,

    THE ZOMBIES:
    I'm not a huge zombies fan but this one's okay.

    THE VERDICT:
    CoD WWII is a good change of pace, and a solid Call of Duty experience, but is plagued with launch issues and broken gameplay mechanics. If you're a huge Call of Duty fan, and was looking forward to this one, go ahead and buy it. If you're not really into Call of Duty and are on the fence, I might be a bit hesitant to spend $60 on it. 6/10. Solid WWII shooter, and a needed change of pace for Call of Duty.
    Edit: 5 months in and I'm done. Boring gameplay, terrible maps, I only have 30 characters left, but no replay value basically.    … Expand
  80. cjwallington
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    absolutely horrible. no manual, no tutorial, no (even in-game) controller layout and a completely linear plot. Now I remember why I dislike the CoD series. Perpetually dying is no way to win a following.
  81. DirectoStream
    May 19, 2018
    0
    Buah que increible decepciòn el juego es igual que los anteriores pero peor aparte de que la campaña es jodidamente dificil lo que lo hace injugable las graficas no estan tan mal graficas 6/10
  82. itsdanky
    May 23, 2018
    0
    DO NOT EXPECT YOUR ORIGINAL FONDNESS TO BE REKINDLED BY THIS MASQUERADE.
    This is not a WW2 game. As stated by many others, this is a just modern warfare reskinned to look like WW2. I was very excited about this game, because I was an avid player of the original CODs in the WW2 era. I was hoping to get that experience with updated features. I am beyond disappointed. To help others avoid    DO NOT EXPECT YOUR ORIGINAL FONDNESS TO BE REKINDLED BY THIS MASQUERADE.
    This is not a WW2 game. As stated by many others, this is a just modern warfare reskinned to look like WW2. I was very excited about this game, because I was an avid player of the original CODs in the WW2 era. I was hoping to get that experience with updated features. I am beyond disappointed. To help others avoid buying this game with false expectations, I will tell you what aspects ruined it for me.

    -BOLT ACTION IRON SIGHTS DESTROYED
    Firstly, the only weapon I used in COD1, UO, and COD2 was the bolt action rifle with iron sights. It took skill, and it fit my play style of not jumping around like an idiot with an SMG. Bolt action rifles (iron sights only) also happened to be the most common weapon in WW2 apart from American forces. What does COD WW2 give us? One bolt action rifle with iron sights that was put into the game as an afterthought and must be unlocked AND take up an attachment slot. Scopes are the default. In addition the iron sight bolt action rifle still handles like there is a scope on it. The animation and timing looks and feels like you are trying to look through the lens. This exclusion of the one of the most quintessential aspects of the WW2 genre is a slap in the face to all bolt action iron sight lovers.

    -This is still nothing more than a full auto/quick scoping nightmare.
    Full autos existed in the original CODs, but they were nowhere near the instakill 'who shoots first' death machines that comprise CODWW2. Yes, a good player could iron sight someone at long range with a carefully aimed headshot, but not at full auto. The original full auto weapons wouldn't melt down 4 players instantly halfway across the map. The recoil was far greater, and trigger control was necessary for accuracy even at close range.

    -Bullet piercing is outrageous.
    Bullets from even small caliber fire piercing thick metal surfaces is ludicrous. It's even worse on rinse and repeat maps with predictable hiding places. Just shoot through where you know someone will be. Yawn.

    -Tactical awareness of surroundings ruined.
    Then: Stealth determined by careful movement and selective fire. Enemy positions determined by careless movement and selective fire. You learned to locate the enemy by listening and instinct. The distinct sound of a Garand after it fired its last round giving you a brief window of opportunity. The difference between an enemy and ally based on the type of gun being fired. Does a German break cover to pursue the location of the person firing an STG44? Not likely. Weapons were restricted to the forces that used them. This seemingly unimportant aspect makes a world of difference in actual gameplay. You had only your senses to help you. Yes people still did the "run n' gun"/"spray n pray", but they were at a serious disadvantage to a calculated player.

    Now: Any gun, any player. Weapon distinctions rendered pointless. Recon scorestreak to show enemy positions. So much overpowering ambient noise and/or perks to make listening for the enemy no more than a crapshoot.

    -Screen shake over the top.
    My screen shakes constantly. Far away explosions make your screen shake violently. It's a stupidly poor attempt at immersion and gives me a headache.

    -Melee Showdowns
    Who didn't enjoy watching two bolt actions clashing at close range and having a melee duel? Dancing around trying to land a carefully aimed rifle butt to the face. It was almost a common understanding, an unspoken gentleman's agreement if you will, to duke it out. It was an endearing aspect of the originals. Well, that's not a thing anymore. The old mechanics made it viable. Now, well, the game design doesn't even allow for such a thing to happen.

    Bottom Line:
    I made the mistake of pre-ordering this game on PSN due to my excitement but couldn't get a refund after I played the Beta. I didn't download the actual game and play it for 6 months because the Beta disgusted me. They destroyed practically everything that made the original games great. Why do I have to play for hours to unlock the most common weapon type in WW2 (iron sighted bolt action)?
    ***Yes I am aware that the American standard issue was not a bolt action, but the British, German, Russian, Japanese, Italian, etc were all issued bolt action iron sighted weapons as the primary small arm***
    Why is the only ONE available designed like garbage?
    This game was marketed with lies that appealed to the emotional attachment players had to the originals and only delivered hot garbage. The game doesn't even feel like WW2.

    I don't care about the micro transactions. You don't have to buy crates to get loot and unlockables. You get plenty of crates from orders and contracts. If people want to waste money on overpriced crates, that's their prerogative.

    Buy the game used if you must. There is certainly no shortage of used copies.    … Expand
  83. N-_
    Jul 6, 2018
    4
    The voice in this game yells at you that you have to do the missions: "conquer the bunker!" and "defend the bridge!".... I don't really like that.
    And the game goes a bit to fast for me....
  84. arconevv
    Mar 26, 2019
    1
    A piece of feminist **** SJW. The veterans of this war did not die for it. **** cuckolds, what happened to the white man?
  85. M_Hjalmers
    Apr 5, 2019
    3
    I wanted to really like and enjoy this game, but it doesn't cut it for me. The campaign was good though 8/10. When ever I try this game I find my self going back to Cod Infinite Warfare, that game is so much better on all fronts in my opinion with the only exception that you can't save your custom game settings (???). I paid 80$ for this and I really regret it :/
  86. levimans
    Aug 31, 2019
    1
    just a one for the graphics. I want to play a game, not a f...ing movie. I thought: finally a WWII shooter like World At War but nooooooo. almost no action in singleplayer and when there is action and you want to replay it, you have see al those video scenes again, can't skip them, f...ing annoying, jesus tapdancing christ. as well as the multiplayer: almost NOBODY plays it. medal of honorjust a one for the graphics. I want to play a game, not a f...ing movie. I thought: finally a WWII shooter like World At War but nooooooo. almost no action in singleplayer and when there is action and you want to replay it, you have see al those video scenes again, can't skip them, f...ing annoying, jesus tapdancing christ. as well as the multiplayer: almost NOBODY plays it. medal of honor allied assault was one of the best games ever. Why don't they make something like that again. So much fun to play, but this ain't fun at all. Money wasted for nothing except for good graphics. That's all… Expand
  87. Jtalk
    Jun 13, 2020
    1
    This is the worst shooter game I’ve seen in a while. The single player part features crowd favourites, such as:
    - Very hard QTE where you fight a nazi, that reloads very slowly - Dumb AI that likes blocking your line of sight on the enemy only to engage one further away
    - Aim that jumps up every time you get hit - A mount machine gun that doesn’t scare enemies in the slightest, it’s    This is the worst shooter game I’ve seen in a while. The single player part features crowd favourites, such as:
    - Very hard QTE where you fight a nazi, that reloads very slowly - Dumb AI that likes blocking your line of sight on the enemy only to engage one further away
    - Aim that jumps up every time you get hit - A mount machine gun that doesn’t scare enemies in the slightest, it’s easier to use a rifle
    - Lots of running - Enemies with amputated self-preservation instinct (and common sense)

    This game represents all the bad stuff that happens with commercialised milking of franchises these days.    … Expand
  88. nicerdicer
    Oct 1, 2020
    0
    Terrible customer support. Leaves no reply no resolution after few times contacting them. My concern was language support for the game other then IP-bounded. I was forced to play with a language in game of my current residence, and I just want at least original language, normally I would pick whatever language I want for the supported list, but here you can not pick anything other thenTerrible customer support. Leaves no reply no resolution after few times contacting them. My concern was language support for the game other then IP-bounded. I was forced to play with a language in game of my current residence, and I just want at least original language, normally I would pick whatever language I want for the supported list, but here you can not pick anything other then language of a country you are currently residing… Expand
  89. Greek_objektife
    Jun 9, 2021
    4
    Понтенциальное возвращение к истокам провалили под частую,сюжет пресный,мультиплеер говнище и геймплей в синглплеере говнище полное плюс сеттинг второй мировой войны превратили в комедию
  90. StudentCritic20
    Mar 26, 2022
    2
    Got this game from my PS+ subscription and still feel cheated/scammed. They story was so boring by the third mission, I had just removed it from my console. The game was a cash grab more than a return to the roots claim they made.
  91. Ikarimalice
    Nov 20, 2017
    4
    Simply put, multiplayer this time around feels the most broken in terms of lag compensation the series has ever had. If I play at 2 or 3 in the morning(EST) I manage high KDR. If I play during prime time, it's pretty much me going 3-20 every match. Gun fights are unwinnable. Half the time I'm shooting at someone the hits aren't registering and if they do, I still will likely be killedSimply put, multiplayer this time around feels the most broken in terms of lag compensation the series has ever had. If I play at 2 or 3 in the morning(EST) I manage high KDR. If I play during prime time, it's pretty much me going 3-20 every match. Gun fights are unwinnable. Half the time I'm shooting at someone the hits aren't registering and if they do, I still will likely be killed first(this is even when I'm crouching around a corner proned and waiting for someone to run into my sights). I wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machine gun/shot gun classes unplayable for those with strong connections. I *have* to use long range assault rifles and even then, I *have* to be viewing down scope before someone is in sight to stand a chance. Ever wanted to know what it feels like to consistently prone down in a corner half covered by a wall waiting for someone to round a corner(not because you're a camper, but because you *have* to camp) and then when they do, they STILL manage to zoom down their scope at you and fire 3 shots before you get to fire one, and then in the replay that half second you saw them before being shot was actually a full 1-2 seconds? Then play this.… Expand
  92. mrnice
    Jun 17, 2020
    4
    If the setting isn't cliched enough for you, the nazi zombies multiplayer mode serves an even bigger cliche. Just a corporate product for the mindless masses.
  93. Zukku
    Jul 11, 2020
    2
    What a terrible game. What a sad return to WW2. I actually enjoy the campaigns of COD games - this is the first that i just find totally unplayable. Bad characters, the worst quick-time-events i've ever seen, arcade-style shooting and the most boring story.
  94. MetroidFelipe
    Feb 24, 2019
    1
    Worst Call Of duty , Return of WW II no Thats a pile o ****

    Pior Call of Duty que joguei campanhas em graça, multiplayer pobre e cheio de microtransações, não pula as cinematics lixo armas não realistas, Inteligência artificial burra e repetitivo,
    Passe Longe quer um bom game Coop jogue Battlefield 4 ou One, ou os Antigos Call Of Duty como o World At War!
  95. JerTheStampede
    Apr 29, 2021
    1
    I hadn't picked up a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 2 back on the Xbox 360, I thoroughly enjoyed each instalment until BO2 at which point I felt something went horribly wrong but couldn't put my finger on it at the time.
    Roll on several years and I picked up WWII for PS4, to start with I thought yes the controls are tight the action reasonably well paced I thought 'this might be pretty    I hadn't picked up a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 2 back on the Xbox 360, I thoroughly enjoyed each instalment until BO2 at which point I felt something went horribly wrong but couldn't put my finger on it at the time.
    Roll on several years and I picked up WWII for PS4, to start with I thought yes the controls are tight the action reasonably well paced I thought 'this might be pretty solid'.. I was wrong.
    1st the quick time events (QTE) are horrible maybe it's me but reading the prompts wasn't obvious initially, and these QTE start getting over used real quick.
    2nd If anything makes me scream obscenities at a game it's headshotting an enemy (not a boss a normal grunt) and them getting up as if nothing more inconvenient than a tenis ball had bopped them on the nose and if you shoot a German in his velar weave mithril silver trench coat expect to empty several rounds to inconvenience him, what the hell man!? it isn't 1996 anymore! games moved past this kind of cheap bullet sponging decades ago.
    3rd British SOE agents, there is SOO much wrong with this anyone with half a brain or any level of understanding of the SOE is forced to cringe and I'm not talking about the now obligatory female agent (they existed maybe not in the capacity shown but I can live with that) what made me cringe was as soon as SOE were mentioned I thought ok when do they roll out the cockney weasels.. TADA as if by magic.
    By the time I derailed an heavily armoured train WITH A JEEP!!! ffs I had had enough, I couldn't suspend my disbelief any further this campaign was badly written poorly implemented garbage.
    I'm glad I didn't pay full price for this game I would have felt violated.
    I'm yet to try the multiplayer, for all I enjoy MP COD, the campaign is primarily why I used to buy these titles.    … Expand
  96. njja02
    Jun 17, 2018
    4
    Better than the last few CODs, but still pretty average. The campaign this time around was too over-the-top and repetitive for me. But the multiplayer did add one mode that I enjoyed; War. Plus the zombies was a bit better this time around. But it just didn't do much for me overall.
  97. trival
    Oct 21, 2020
    3
    just **** ... single play camp sucks hard. dumb missions historically innacurate.
  98. MadMax3
    Oct 1, 2020
    0
    Trash mais um jogo mal desenvolvido pela activision, tinha potencial para ser o melhor, mas como sempre os bugs e os glichs tomam contam de um jogo promissor.
  99. frederik1478
    Oct 19, 2021
    4
    This game could have been amazing but the set pieces and the constant taking control away leave you with a kind of nothing and boring feeling, har unskippable cutscenes which just takes the replay value ride out of it,
  100. weirdmagican21
    Jan 11, 2019
    1
    i really wanted to like this game i wanted to grind to max rank nut this is probably the worst launch in call of duty history and the microtransactions are disrespectful to people who fought in WWII and the veterans who are still alive today.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »