Call of Duty: Black Ops III

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2841 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,091 out of 2841
  2. Mixed: 597 out of 2841
  3. Negative: 1,153 out of 2841
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Get_Gud_Bruh
    Feb 1, 2016
    8
    First off, let's talk about value:
    1) You have campaign. I'm not such a fan with campaign since blops2 and I can't say that I will consider story mode at all even in this particular CoD. This does give a feature like WaW that allows you to play Co-op campaign which is nostalgia and great addition that should've been with every CoD game since WaW but failed in its predecessors.
    2)    First off, let's talk about value:
    1) You have campaign. I'm not such a fan with campaign since blops2 and I can't say that I will consider story mode at all even in this particular CoD. This does give a feature like WaW that allows you to play Co-op campaign which is nostalgia and great addition that should've been with every CoD game since WaW but failed in its predecessors.

    2) Multiplayer - the icing on the cake that I play that seems to be balanced, almost too balanced. The maps are a bit basic making the game almost too simple which make the 3-way map design generic. Sniping from blops2 aim assist is gone making it a diluted game play w/o snipers. Every game lobby you enter will have smgs or ARs, which loses its luster after 2 months of playing this game continuously.

    3) Zombie and arcade zombie: these are additions to the game which makes this game pretty valuable across the board.

    4) innovation: You get the new mode called Free Run. Although there's not a lot going on it it is a step in the right direction as for innovation. It's stepping into boundaries of another game called Mirror's Edge which is something to be excited about. I wish they put more of an effort for this particular mode like Co-op and racing against others as well as shadow AI to see how players above you completed this course.

    I'm surprised at all that people are giving such low credit for this game as it is quite valuable for what they're giving you. Yes, it is quantity over quality, but allowing 4 games in one is still worth the price even when it's dropping substantially.

    Multiplayer:

    This is pretty much the only game mode I play, which says a lot about me, however I have tried all modes before giving this review. The multiplayer isn't as good as previous CoD games like blops2 or MW2. I feel as though this should've been released before AW as well to give people the chance to progress through y-axis movement. If anything this is an upgrade to blops2 with much slower gameplay even with boost movement is involved. The maps feel smaller than any of the basic previous Treyarch maps from blops1, blops2, and WaW. For maps being this small w/boost movements I must say they put things in a pickle.

    The game, again, is balanced. Almost too balanced. Shotguns aren't good anymore making them almost useless when it comes to basic TDM. Even the argus takes real skill for it to be par with the worst smg. Almost all ARs and smgs are relatively close to being the same weapon with minor tweaks like higher rpm, better recoil or more damage. It's like they had a basic semi and gave the gun points for auto, damage, recoil, magazine, and rpm while making different combinations using the same point system just for guns to make their guns.

    Sniping is low tier due to the fact that aim assist is gone. Anyone who still uses sniper rifles in this particular CoD is using pure skill at this point. LMGs feel extremely heavy compared to blops2, but w/perk manipulation that some of the pubstompers have figured out you can use it almost like an AR. But because this game is faster paced for smgs to rule the game using LMG is outclassed in most situations besides modes like Domination and safeguard.

    I'm giving the game higher than 7 because of its value. If it didn't include the extra mode freerun I would've given it just 7 because it would've been a lesser version of blops2. I can't say this game for multiplayer is better than blops2 because of how generic the gameplay feels and the bland feeling that my opponent is either wielding an smg or AR rather than go shotgunning, knifing, sniper rifle or LMG.    … Expand
  2. dadadaddadadda
    Jan 31, 2016
    5
    Pros. Killing stuff cons.same as cod bo2 get metal gear solid v or the elder scrolls v or rocket league or battelfield 4 or need for speed rivals or assassins creed black flag not this game
  3. WiiUGamer7
    Jan 30, 2016
    4
    Call of Duty as brought nothing new to the entire genre. First-person shooters haven't innovated at all. This game shows it clearly. Titanfall had it first. Not only that, but the campaign sucks, and the multiplayer is bland. Never have I seen such a putrid mess.
  4. teodoro907
    Jan 29, 2016
    0
    boring campaign, horrible respawn system, the specialist thing sucks, i hate being on a killstreak and then being killed by some one shot kill specialist weapon, most of the maps are just bad, nuketown is just chaos with all this jumping and wall running, some weapons are useless, for example shotguns are either buggy or need a huge buff cause even if i stick its barrel up someone's ass, iboring campaign, horrible respawn system, the specialist thing sucks, i hate being on a killstreak and then being killed by some one shot kill specialist weapon, most of the maps are just bad, nuketown is just chaos with all this jumping and wall running, some weapons are useless, for example shotguns are either buggy or need a huge buff cause even if i stick its barrel up someone's ass, i still need to shoot 2-3 times to kill him

    long story short, this game has really disappoint me, i really hoped that treyarch could bring the cod franchise back but this game just sucks, it ain't cod anymore. i loved bo1 and bo2 but bo3 is just unplayable    … Expand
  5. VentusXP
    Jan 29, 2016
    0
    At first, i began to think that Black Ops 3 would be one of the best CoD games to date. i was wrong, dead wrong. there are way too many glitches that still have not been patched, and to me the gameplay is just boring in general. everyone is running around and jumping all the time, which is exactly the complaints i heard about 2014's Advanced Warfare. i prefer that game over this one. ifAt first, i began to think that Black Ops 3 would be one of the best CoD games to date. i was wrong, dead wrong. there are way too many glitches that still have not been patched, and to me the gameplay is just boring in general. everyone is running around and jumping all the time, which is exactly the complaints i heard about 2014's Advanced Warfare. i prefer that game over this one. if you're a fan of Call of Duty, please, continue to play and buy the games, but i'm sorry, Black Ops 3 ruined the entire thing for me. i no longer wish to play CoD games from this point.… Expand
  6. RB053273
    Jan 29, 2016
    8
    black ops 3 is a really good game the way how multiplayer plays is very good the way how all the guns are so balanced and zombies is very good this year especially recreating der riese was amazing it plays exactly the same as how the map used to be but campaign is awful its just really boring and not good as call of duty campaigns used to be especially with MW2 and call of duty 4 possiblyblack ops 3 is a really good game the way how multiplayer plays is very good the way how all the guns are so balanced and zombies is very good this year especially recreating der riese was amazing it plays exactly the same as how the map used to be but campaign is awful its just really boring and not good as call of duty campaigns used to be especially with MW2 and call of duty 4 possibly having the best campaigns of all time.… Expand
  7. SquadPoop
    Jan 28, 2016
    5
    3 Steps Back.

    Coming off of Advanced Warfare, Blops 3 is 3 steps back in the evolution of this series. The campaign while enjoyable, is the standard explosion filled 6 hour circle jerk of kill these things in a linear path towards your objective. The multiplayer is the biggest **** of all though. The exo system in AW was near perfect, you could dodge using one click of the sticks in any    3 Steps Back.

    Coming off of Advanced Warfare, Blops 3 is 3 steps back in the evolution of this series. The campaign while enjoyable, is the standard explosion filled 6 hour circle jerk of kill these things in a linear path towards your objective. The multiplayer is the biggest **** of all though. The exo system in AW was near perfect, you could dodge using one click of the sticks in any direction without needing to use the jump button, the exo system in AW made you feel like you had control, being able to quickly evade bullets and attack back rather than slightly gliding to the left and dying faster than you can say **** And removing exo abilities just limits the amount of options you have to use. The customization was chipped too, in AW there were hundreds of thousands of different armor pieces, from common to elite to legendary, if you wanted a damn clown mask mixed with a samurai chest piece, you could do that, but in BO3, your limited to 9 people, with about 9 head and chest pieces that look ugly if you mix them. That's it. No really that's it. There is a weapon paintshop that no one uses though, so yeah. The specialist weapons are cool, but really just make you wish that they were just scorestreaks, scorestreaks are also ****ed, in AW you could customize your streaks, if you wanted your carepackage to explode if an enemy tried to take it, you could do that, if you wanted the points to carry over if you die, you could do that. Basically in a nutshell, this game limits everything that you do, dynamic maps that change (like the map that is split into 2 parts where halfway through the map you are forced to switch sides) are gone, the gun range is gun, one hit melees are gone. Like i said, 3 steps back.    … Expand
  8. zyzzbrahjesper
    Jan 28, 2016
    0
    You kill people for XP. It gets pretty boring very fast. ;))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
  9. axino
    Jan 27, 2016
    7
    Ok this is a review of the multiplayer only since i haven't touched campaign or zombies yet and after playing bo2 its kinda obvious how those two modes are going to be like.
    On to the multiplayer ok first things first match making is not great, takes some time to find matches and people only play dom and tdm. I have had lag issues and its not just my internet its the hosts connection.    Ok this is a review of the multiplayer only since i haven't touched campaign or zombies yet and after playing bo2 its kinda obvious how those two modes are going to be like.
    On to the multiplayer ok first things first match making is not great, takes some time to find matches and people only play dom and tdm. I have had lag issues and its not just my internet its the hosts connection. (activision, billion dollar company and no dedicated servers...). Maps are ehh but obviously since there brining back old maps into map packs they gotta make more money. Maps could have better layout but some are ok. Graphics are fine for console no problems here. Guns.... as usual smgs are op, and everything else takes some "skill" to use but smgs are spray and pray (vesper). The specialist are cool but some are obviously better than others but are are playable if you get used to their abilities. Last but not least is the extra content aka customization. You can customize alot of your online charecter and thats really cool, (gun paint, specialist skin, emblem, etc) some stuff you get from micro-trans but its optional of course. This was my first cod since bo2 and it brings back some memories, i still wish it played like old cod and didn't have thrusting and wall running tho. In the end the multiplayer does not deserve a 10 5 or 0. id give at the worst a 6.7 and at best a 7.9.    … Expand
  10. scherk862
    Jan 26, 2016
    1
    This game could be really good but they ruined it! The campaing is the worst ever, but we all know it wouldn't be good, but not this bad.The multiplayer is good, but in Brazil it's really hard to play since we have the worst connection in the history of Call of Duty, at first it was unplayable, but after some updates it started to get better, but now they seem to have abandoned ourThis game could be really good but they ruined it! The campaing is the worst ever, but we all know it wouldn't be good, but not this bad.The multiplayer is good, but in Brazil it's really hard to play since we have the worst connection in the history of Call of Duty, at first it was unplayable, but after some updates it started to get better, but now they seem to have abandoned our servers, thinking 'it's good enough for brazilians to play with 150~130ms ping in EVERY MATCH. The best part of the game is the zombies, it's really good i always have a good time on this mode, but even when every thing is perfect they ruin things. They made only one map in the game, ONE SINGLE MAP, just to make sure that every body will buy the season pass. Im really disappointed with treyarch and activision, they don't care about their fans anymore, the game industry is all about the money nowadays.… Expand
  11. piter2604
    Jan 26, 2016
    3
    Developers need to stop giving us this sci-fi crap. Jet packs??? running on the walls??? glitch features???!!! and no option to turn all that stuff off. terrible game. total waste of money!
  12. kashimpl
    Jan 25, 2016
    8
    In my opinion game is decent. Playing on Veteran difficulty is quite a challenge. Co-op (split screen or lan/network) is very funny and content for it include campaign, zombies and nighmares. Multiplayer is also quite good i would gave a litlle more life so we could really fight in MP.

    For - Some fps drops that make a little too much blurr in cutscenes (fps synchronization much out of    In my opinion game is decent. Playing on Veteran difficulty is quite a challenge. Co-op (split screen or lan/network) is very funny and content for it include campaign, zombies and nighmares. Multiplayer is also quite good i would gave a litlle more life so we could really fight in MP.

    For -
    Some fps drops that make a little too much blurr in cutscenes (fps synchronization much out of control) It was quite noticable on 55 inch tv.

    Sorry for my english    … Expand
  13. boba-fett_junio
    Jan 24, 2016
    6
    this game had a lot of potential that was set to look like the best call of duty since the original black ops but then I was left shocked. call of duty black ops 3 had 3 promising modes campaign first of the campaign was indeed the worst campaign since cod 3 with no storyline into to it. if you understand the plot you must be Einstein. zombies 1 map shadows of evil just a load of rubbishthis game had a lot of potential that was set to look like the best call of duty since the original black ops but then I was left shocked. call of duty black ops 3 had 3 promising modes campaign first of the campaign was indeed the worst campaign since cod 3 with no storyline into to it. if you understand the plot you must be Einstein. zombies 1 map shadows of evil just a load of rubbish to do all of the rituals for a pack a punch gun! I rather it cow poo then do rituals. and I spent 65$ for the giant which I must say my favourite zombies map since mob of the dead very small but simple and a load a fun. Multiplayer in one word jump. this is pretty much advance warfare 2 which is a bad thing cause people jumping every 3 seconds and the 5 year old brats screaming into the mic saying I bang your mum and getting hate mail cause you were sniping. the gun balance is like bo2 very well usable better than AW!. I hope the 4 map packs will be good but at the moment I stand by my decision 60/100.… Expand
  14. LanceUppercut
    Jan 23, 2016
    5
    All bells, no whistles. The art for this game is absolutely stunning, and fun. It makes you excited when you're creating your classes, customizing your specialist, and getting ready to play. But that's where the fun ends. Once you join a game, frustration will quickly ensue. The game play is very inconsistent and you'll find yourself yelling obscenities to at your screen in no time.All bells, no whistles. The art for this game is absolutely stunning, and fun. It makes you excited when you're creating your classes, customizing your specialist, and getting ready to play. But that's where the fun ends. Once you join a game, frustration will quickly ensue. The game play is very inconsistent and you'll find yourself yelling obscenities to at your screen in no time. The matchmaking leaves a lot to be desired, and the game lags really bad. Half a second doesn't sound like a lot of time, but when you're in a multiplayer match, it means the world. More times than not, it feels like you're playing half a second behind any other opposing player. You run around a corner, see an opponent, and before you even have a chance to think about what you need to do, you fall down dead.

    Before purchasing this game, keep checking the COD community for positive feedback. The site is currently a bed of negative comments, which Activision and Treyarch are flat out ignoring. Maybe in March 2016 when they roll out the new DLC, things will improve. But as of the time of this review, the game isn't worth it. If you love hours of frustration, and always playing angry...this game is for you. If not, spend your money on something else.    … Expand
  15. robh404
    Jan 21, 2016
    8
    CoD 3 might not have a great story or characterization but it does one thing right - it's fun. The shooting is solid and there's enough varied content to offer re-playability for a long time. Sure this game lacks in almost all supporting aspects (forgettable story, soundtrack, and graphics could be better) but none of that interfered with gameplay.
  16. IPintheForest
    Jan 17, 2016
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag… Expand
  17. PolariXBlaZe
    Jan 16, 2016
    9
    Wonderful game! Multiplayer maps are great, although combine is a bit too popular. Campaign is great too, and zombies is very very fun. Not the best Call of Duty, but is by far the best since Black Ops 2.
  18. mhammadwaqas
    Jan 15, 2016
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Was quite looking forward to this but am quite dissapointed with the campaign, its beautiful graphics but it feels flat and at times feels quite lost. The multiplayer is the same as any other COD.
    This feels like nothing more than a sequel to Modern Warfare 3 and Ghosts. Very difficult for my middle aged eyes to see the enemy's with this graphics. Thoroughly enjoyed Advanced Warfare but really bummed I purchased this game for $60. Luckily I didn't pay for the DLC's.This is the most fun I've had with a COD since 4, I think all of the mixed and negative reviews are unfounded and honestly Meteoritic should require some kind of proof before you can post bile or come **** on something that's "cool to hate."    … Expand
  19. Taipan_19
    Jan 15, 2016
    0
    I hated this campaign. It made no sense at all and I found myself so annoyed at the story at the halfway point I wanted to cry and chuck a fit but instead I sucked it up and tried to care about the characters at which I failed to do. A total waste of time and effort. (Multiplayer is decent.)
  20. Kaybe3
    Jan 14, 2016
    10
    Best game after cod 4. Feels nothing like AW. Most of the maps are good on multiplayer. The campaign is good too. I personally loved the zombie. I loved the game.
  21. TheOneLeon
    Jan 13, 2016
    5
    There have been few Call of Duties that I personally found hard to enjoy. They all had their moments of boredom and of staleness, but in the end, they managed to have a kind of longevity as, contrary to popukar belief, most changed up the established formula just enough to keep the player interested and engaged. Therefore it is with deep regret that i saw that Black Ops 3 stands among theThere have been few Call of Duties that I personally found hard to enjoy. They all had their moments of boredom and of staleness, but in the end, they managed to have a kind of longevity as, contrary to popukar belief, most changed up the established formula just enough to keep the player interested and engaged. Therefore it is with deep regret that i saw that Black Ops 3 stands among the likes of Ghosts as one of the most boring and stale Call of Duties to date. The campaign has gone from the gorgeous cinematics and memorable characters that COD is known for, to emptionless romps through groups of baddies and a sea of faces who dont bring enough personality for me to even remember their names. I personally hate the nameless customized protagonist, but thats the least of the issues. The 4-D movement that was advertised is absolutely atrocious. Advanced Warfare had much more fluid 4-D movement, and maps that actually compliment these abilities. Your first few online matches will be spent mindlessly trying to jump over walls or wall sprint only to find that these abilities only work in specific areas, making them a major hindrance. Overall, i wanted to like this game, i really truly did. Maybe i can one day, but not today.… Expand
  22. VadimZe
    Jan 12, 2016
    1
    Абсолютно отвратительная игра, сингл слишком урезанный, локализация отвратная, в онлайне лаги постоянные и одна и та же карта "Combine" выпадает. Лучшее разочарование 2015 года.
  23. Sparkyte
    Jan 11, 2016
    2
    I have to say the Graphics are incredibly stunning!

    That's just it. The gameplay is mediocre if not a sloppy second of many better titles. For the beginning player it puts someone into an incredibly abyssmal position if they're not familiar with the control scape. Kill streaks whether or not they provide give a significant imbalance to the multiplayer gameplay experience. This game    I have to say the Graphics are incredibly stunning!

    That's just it. The gameplay is mediocre if not a sloppy second of many better titles. For the beginning player it puts someone into an incredibly abyssmal position if they're not familiar with the control scape. Kill streaks whether or not they provide give a significant imbalance to the multiplayer gameplay experience.

    This game is a perfect example too much and being so little at the same time.    … Expand
  24. Yoystik
    Jan 9, 2016
    5
    This is not a call of duty game anymore... the good CODs were MW, MW2, BO and BO2.. and from all the others are not good or are just copies of other games (titanfall you there?)...
    The graphics are good (I think thats the only possitive point)
    The respawns are awful The story is pointless and boring The mechanics on the game are not good What the hell is the weapons on the zombies????    This is not a call of duty game anymore... the good CODs were MW, MW2, BO and BO2.. and from all the others are not good or are just copies of other games (titanfall you there?)...
    The graphics are good (I think thats the only possitive point)
    The respawns are awful
    The story is pointless and boring
    The mechanics on the game are not good
    What the hell is the weapons on the zombies????
    and overall the game is not fun to play    … Expand
  25. TRMSGnick
    Jan 9, 2016
    0
    Way too overrated its the same as any other call of but but with futuristic stupid tools and guns. The story is bad and the gameplays the same as Advanced Warfare the only reason it has somewhat good reviews is because most of those reviewers think COD is one of the best gaming franchises ever made I didn't buy this game because I knew it was going to suck so I hunted down the nearestWay too overrated its the same as any other call of but but with futuristic stupid tools and guns. The story is bad and the gameplays the same as Advanced Warfare the only reason it has somewhat good reviews is because most of those reviewers think COD is one of the best gaming franchises ever made I didn't buy this game because I knew it was going to suck so I hunted down the nearest blockbuster about 2 hours away and got and reviewed it then I sold it to a mate for £25 he thought he was getting a deal of a lifetime. (by the way this the only COD that I technically bought since BO2 I didnt play Ghosts my friend gave me his advanced warfare for a week to try and convince me to play COD again no suprise it was stupidly futuristic)… Expand
  26. gameslayer621
    Jan 8, 2016
    10
    My only complaint about this game is you have to play $50 to play the same zombie map that you played in WaW and BO1 2 million times. Oh and wallrunning will get you killed and the auto aim is ridiculous
  27. Bastrix
    Jan 7, 2016
    7
    I haven't played COD for a while now, I'm not a fanboy of anything, and I'm no hater. This game could've been a lot better IMO but it doesn't deserve any of those stupid low scores.

    Campaign is good but not great, with an overly complex and confusing story, nothing really new, nice graphics, nice performance and of course the greatest thing for me is that it's coop. I expected a lot    I haven't played COD for a while now, I'm not a fanboy of anything, and I'm no hater. This game could've been a lot better IMO but it doesn't deserve any of those stupid low scores.

    Campaign is good but not great, with an overly complex and confusing story, nothing really new, nice graphics, nice performance and of course the greatest thing for me is that it's coop. I expected a lot more of intense action though and less story telling. Fun overall but could be a lot better.

    Multiplayer is solid, It's fast paced and handles as expected. Although I feel like the Light Machine Guns are useless, because they are so slow to aim with and since in this multiplayer most of the time tis about how fast you can aim when coming face to face with an enemy. However I really prefer other games when it comes to multiplayer, there are no vehicles and most of the combat is in small levels and close encounters.

    +Having coop campaign is the reason I got this game
    +Nice graphics and performance
    +Solid multiplayer

    -I found SEVERAL BUGS in the campaign, really bad ones
    -Lacks intense action in campaign + too much useless story telling
    -Gets boring quick    … Expand
  28. Juhiz
    Jan 6, 2016
    8
    I think COD (or any annualized franchise) is a easy target for trash talk. I feel that you earn the right to criticize COD after you have played all installments in this series. And i have... BLOPS 3 Is the deepest multiplayer experience so far in this franchise. Multiplayer has a steeper learning curve and gameplay has evolved to more skill-based direction. Weapons are reallyI think COD (or any annualized franchise) is a easy target for trash talk. I feel that you earn the right to criticize COD after you have played all installments in this series. And i have... BLOPS 3 Is the deepest multiplayer experience so far in this franchise. Multiplayer has a steeper learning curve and gameplay has evolved to more skill-based direction. Weapons are really well-balanced. No more quick-scoping. Aim-assist is minimal. Player has to learn to aim.

    Generally when speaking about COD first thing comes to mind teenagers and kids shouting profanities in in-game chat (something they´re going to do with your mother). That´s not Activision´s nor the developers fault. That´s just bad parenting. ESRB M-rating (17+) and PEGI 18 .. !!!!!BAD PARENTING!!!!!!    … Expand
  29. Harry28
    Jan 6, 2016
    7
    Black Ops 3 is a great game, but it's not amazing, it is plagued by the same problems that every Call of Duty has. Bad spawns, terrible matchmaking and horrendous team balance. But that's just multiplayer. The campaign is forgettable, like almost every COD, but Black Ops 3 zombies is a bit different from the other COD zombies, so if your playing it just for zombies I'm pretty sure you'llBlack Ops 3 is a great game, but it's not amazing, it is plagued by the same problems that every Call of Duty has. Bad spawns, terrible matchmaking and horrendous team balance. But that's just multiplayer. The campaign is forgettable, like almost every COD, but Black Ops 3 zombies is a bit different from the other COD zombies, so if your playing it just for zombies I'm pretty sure you'll love it. The game could be 9/10 if they fixed multiplayer and put more effort into the campaign.… Expand
  30. Tonka13
    Jan 4, 2016
    7
    I don't bother with the story lines or zombies, just the multiplayer. It plays ok but the different characters take some getting used to. The things that turn me off are the fact this is set in the future (as opposed to to the old COD / MW series), the characters are somewhat Japanese in look and feel and the games end with some silly taunts. In all this seems to be aimed at a youngerI don't bother with the story lines or zombies, just the multiplayer. It plays ok but the different characters take some getting used to. The things that turn me off are the fact this is set in the future (as opposed to to the old COD / MW series), the characters are somewhat Japanese in look and feel and the games end with some silly taunts. In all this seems to be aimed at a younger audience than previous COD games. The weapons are, as always, imaginative and there's some good ones in this package, so overall it's worth getting. I just wish they'd return to some of the older outdoor maps and eras to make sniping more challenging.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

51
#51 Best PS4 Game of 2015
8
#8 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 87 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 73 out of 87
  2. Mixed: 14 out of 87
  3. Negative: 0 out of 87
  1. GameGrin
    Feb 4, 2016
    75
    Underneath the glamour, it feels like just another Call of Duty game - to the delight of existing fans, but the chagrin of players seeking new turf.
    Read full review
  2. CD-Action
    Jan 12, 2016
    75
    Both the single player and online modes are fun but don’t expect to be blown away. Despite a great story and a couple of very enjoyable missions the campaign as a whole is a tad boring. [13/2015, p.50]
  3. Pelit (Finland)
    Jan 4, 2016
    91
    What we have here is the best Call of Duty single player experience to date. The multiplayer is solid too, though the much-talked re-design has resulted a multiplayer experience that really doesn’t differ all that much from the previous ones. [Nov 2015]
See all critic reviews »