Call of Duty: Black Ops III

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2841 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,091 out of 2841
  2. Mixed: 597 out of 2841
  3. Negative: 1,153 out of 2841
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. BrandonNel2307
    Nov 29, 2015
    8
    Can't belive so much people hates this game. It's a big improvement over Black Ops 2 and I almost always have a good time with story mode. Pretty good graphics as well and I didn't run into any glitches so this game has to be loved more.
  2. csking33
    Dec 6, 2015
    8
    Lots of cod haters on here.

    Honestly it's a solid game. Didn't like AW or Ghosts, but this game makes cod fun again.

    Still don't like the movements, but it's a lot better than AW.
  3. WhiteyWyatt
    Dec 10, 2015
    8
    Well, i still miss the days of actual modern combat but this was a well done version of a futuristic setting. The multiplayer was redone with the new operators feature which was pretty cool.
  4. NitrusKiller
    Dec 13, 2015
    8
    It's freaking dumb who write negative reviews.The game isn't perfect but it isn't a piece of crap.The focus of the game is to entertain whoever plays it.And if u aren't entertained by this game u sure have serious problems.And for the people who says "it's not a COD",I answer:They have to make something new that innovates the saga.
  5. justbeinghonest
    Dec 13, 2015
    8
    more of a multiplayer game not too much of a story driven game prefferable a game for people who want to kill time, but its not a horrible game good graphics and gameplay
  6. fop56
    Dec 25, 2015
    8
    i got black ops 3 21 days after it came out and haven't stopped playing it since i got it. The multiplayer is the best to date because it adds advanced technology while still keeping the old feel of call of duty. The zombies mode is really fun and shadows of evil has a great feel to it. the only reason its not getting a perfect score is the campaign is just to weird at parts....wheneveri got black ops 3 21 days after it came out and haven't stopped playing it since i got it. The multiplayer is the best to date because it adds advanced technology while still keeping the old feel of call of duty. The zombies mode is really fun and shadows of evil has a great feel to it. the only reason its not getting a perfect score is the campaign is just to weird at parts....whenever you have to go into someone else brain its getting to far from the beaten path.… Expand
  7. ShangChi
    Dec 28, 2015
    8
    This game is like your average Call of Duty game. I'd say the campaign is quite bad, but most people play for the multiplayer - which is good. The only issue is the occasional lag which can be improved by using an Ethernet cable. The zombies are also fun, but not worth buying just for zombies if you see what I mean. Overall, it is worth buying at a discounted price and don't expect a masterpiece.
  8. RB053273
    Jan 29, 2016
    8
    black ops 3 is a really good game the way how multiplayer plays is very good the way how all the guns are so balanced and zombies is very good this year especially recreating der riese was amazing it plays exactly the same as how the map used to be but campaign is awful its just really boring and not good as call of duty campaigns used to be especially with MW2 and call of duty 4 possiblyblack ops 3 is a really good game the way how multiplayer plays is very good the way how all the guns are so balanced and zombies is very good this year especially recreating der riese was amazing it plays exactly the same as how the map used to be but campaign is awful its just really boring and not good as call of duty campaigns used to be especially with MW2 and call of duty 4 possibly having the best campaigns of all time.… Expand
  9. Get_Gud_Bruh
    Feb 1, 2016
    8
    First off, let's talk about value:
    1) You have campaign. I'm not such a fan with campaign since blops2 and I can't say that I will consider story mode at all even in this particular CoD. This does give a feature like WaW that allows you to play Co-op campaign which is nostalgia and great addition that should've been with every CoD game since WaW but failed in its predecessors.
    2)    First off, let's talk about value:
    1) You have campaign. I'm not such a fan with campaign since blops2 and I can't say that I will consider story mode at all even in this particular CoD. This does give a feature like WaW that allows you to play Co-op campaign which is nostalgia and great addition that should've been with every CoD game since WaW but failed in its predecessors.

    2) Multiplayer - the icing on the cake that I play that seems to be balanced, almost too balanced. The maps are a bit basic making the game almost too simple which make the 3-way map design generic. Sniping from blops2 aim assist is gone making it a diluted game play w/o snipers. Every game lobby you enter will have smgs or ARs, which loses its luster after 2 months of playing this game continuously.

    3) Zombie and arcade zombie: these are additions to the game which makes this game pretty valuable across the board.

    4) innovation: You get the new mode called Free Run. Although there's not a lot going on it it is a step in the right direction as for innovation. It's stepping into boundaries of another game called Mirror's Edge which is something to be excited about. I wish they put more of an effort for this particular mode like Co-op and racing against others as well as shadow AI to see how players above you completed this course.

    I'm surprised at all that people are giving such low credit for this game as it is quite valuable for what they're giving you. Yes, it is quantity over quality, but allowing 4 games in one is still worth the price even when it's dropping substantially.

    Multiplayer:

    This is pretty much the only game mode I play, which says a lot about me, however I have tried all modes before giving this review. The multiplayer isn't as good as previous CoD games like blops2 or MW2. I feel as though this should've been released before AW as well to give people the chance to progress through y-axis movement. If anything this is an upgrade to blops2 with much slower gameplay even with boost movement is involved. The maps feel smaller than any of the basic previous Treyarch maps from blops1, blops2, and WaW. For maps being this small w/boost movements I must say they put things in a pickle.

    The game, again, is balanced. Almost too balanced. Shotguns aren't good anymore making them almost useless when it comes to basic TDM. Even the argus takes real skill for it to be par with the worst smg. Almost all ARs and smgs are relatively close to being the same weapon with minor tweaks like higher rpm, better recoil or more damage. It's like they had a basic semi and gave the gun points for auto, damage, recoil, magazine, and rpm while making different combinations using the same point system just for guns to make their guns.

    Sniping is low tier due to the fact that aim assist is gone. Anyone who still uses sniper rifles in this particular CoD is using pure skill at this point. LMGs feel extremely heavy compared to blops2, but w/perk manipulation that some of the pubstompers have figured out you can use it almost like an AR. But because this game is faster paced for smgs to rule the game using LMG is outclassed in most situations besides modes like Domination and safeguard.

    I'm giving the game higher than 7 because of its value. If it didn't include the extra mode freerun I would've given it just 7 because it would've been a lesser version of blops2. I can't say this game for multiplayer is better than blops2 because of how generic the gameplay feels and the bland feeling that my opponent is either wielding an smg or AR rather than go shotgunning, knifing, sniper rifle or LMG.    … Expand
  10. ANDRAKE005
    Feb 14, 2016
    8
    molto bello ma è molto difficile trovare armi nei pacchetti ma per il resto è moto "facile" in confronto agli altri.i controlli sono molto semplici e si capiscono al volo
  11. GameReviewLB
    Jun 13, 2016
    8
    This game is a good change of the call of duty franchise, the team at trey-arch really spent a while into this game and it is very fun to play.
    Only real problem with this game is that the 'future' style is getting quite stale but this has really over powered the previous game advanced warfare, I would really suggest this game to anyone who likes first person shooters.
  12. salmansohail_
    Jan 29, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty Black Ops 3 is the final installment in the black ops trilogy, but it has nothing to do with it. Infact this really does piss me off as it could have easily been called Advanced Warfare 2. IT had nothing to do with Black Ops. Only a a few words of raul Menendez was spoken and it overall the campaign was boring. However the multiplayer and zombies shine as one of the bestCall of Duty Black Ops 3 is the final installment in the black ops trilogy, but it has nothing to do with it. Infact this really does piss me off as it could have easily been called Advanced Warfare 2. IT had nothing to do with Black Ops. Only a a few words of raul Menendez was spoken and it overall the campaign was boring. However the multiplayer and zombies shine as one of the best experiences I have had throughout the years. The zombies is just a few bugs away from being the best zombies maps. Even If I did prefer the classic movement I think that the advanced movement was nailed down to the ground in this title. Its a great game but the campaign and black market really breaks it out.

    Campaign: 5/10
    -Interesting Story
    -Misleading Game Title
    -Nothing to do with Black Ops.
    -Dumb and Useless Characters
    -Short

    Multiplayer: 8/10
    -Advanced movement surprisingly good
    -Map layout is good
    -Black Market sucks
    -Specialists are unique and not game breaking

    Zombies: 9/10
    -Amazing completion to the zombies universe
    -Fun map flow and Easter eggs
    -A few bugs
    -Gobble gum system works great

    Overall: 8/10    … Expand
  13. Franquixote
    Aug 16, 2016
    8
    Just finished the campaign today- as a middle-aged person with a family and demanding career, gaming is not exactly a priority. Haven't played much multiplayer so this is almost strictly from the point of view of the campaign mode on "recruit". It took about half the game to understand all the mechanics, not interested in finding every collectible or leveling up and don't want frustratingJust finished the campaign today- as a middle-aged person with a family and demanding career, gaming is not exactly a priority. Haven't played much multiplayer so this is almost strictly from the point of view of the campaign mode on "recruit". It took about half the game to understand all the mechanics, not interested in finding every collectible or leveling up and don't want frustrating grinds to find the exact "right" route through a map... the ammo boxes were a bit too plentiful and the boss-type robots were a bit too repetitive and basically just a matter of firing and hiding for 20 minutes until you wear them down. But the graphics and sound were fun and the game has at least a hint of A.I. philosophy behind it and was about the right difficulty to just casually play when I had a few hours to relax. The ending was pretty fun, especially the last 3 minutes when "White Rabbit" is playing in the background.
    I don't generally care for the futuristic stuff and there's minimal strategy here but it was a fun escape for 20 hours or so. $2-3 an hour isn't a bad deal to be entertained and that's not even including the multiplayer or the few times me and a friend have played zombies together. I imagine playing campaign with a friend would've been even more fun.
    Not too shabby, like most everyone else I'm tired of all the futuristic stuff and hope they go back to WW2 or Vietnam or a current-day Middle Eastern theme but I don't regret buying or playing it.    … Expand
  14. Pormetheus12
    Nov 28, 2016
    8
    Decent game with mediocre campaign and OK multiplayer. The guns and maps are not too different from BO2, but it does introduce new mechanics such as the boost and slide. There is a increase in quality of graphics, which is good but sniping in this game has become less fun because targets are very hard to hit and quick-scoping is not a thing anymore.

    I love the zombies as it introduces    Decent game with mediocre campaign and OK multiplayer. The guns and maps are not too different from BO2, but it does introduce new mechanics such as the boost and slide. There is a increase in quality of graphics, which is good but sniping in this game has become less fun because targets are very hard to hit and quick-scoping is not a thing anymore.

    I love the zombies as it introduces new things which makes it fun to play with friends and very challenging.    … Expand
  15. filiptairi92
    Jan 20, 2017
    8
    Ok,i just finished the game.First of all,the campaign is far from bad.I will start from cons.
    First of all,the first thing i noticed is so bad voice acting of the main character.The voice is weird,dull,and at sometimes annoying.I don't know who gave the voice,but for me,it is a very bad choice.
    I think that at this point,nobody likes these futuristic stuff.I mean,ok,it is done good,the    Ok,i just finished the game.First of all,the campaign is far from bad.I will start from cons.
    First of all,the first thing i noticed is so bad voice acting of the main character.The voice is weird,dull,and at sometimes annoying.I don't know who gave the voice,but for me,it is a very bad choice.
    I think that at this point,nobody likes these futuristic stuff.I mean,ok,it is done good,the powers are fun and have great balance.But it's not fun for me,i feel like controling a robot.
    First half of the game is nothing spectacular,the other half becomes interesting.
    Cons: Campaign overall is a good experience.Story is a bit different from other COD games,but it is something new.
    Campaign has some hard parts,which is good.I played it on hardened,and at some points i died for 7,8 times..Finally some challenge from COD campaign.
    The game runs really smooth on my ps4,didn't have much problems on framerate.
    Locations in the mission are good.
    Local coop seems fun,i played it for about an hour with my brother and it's fun,nothing spectacular,but fun.

    Overall,i think the game is not a dissapointment,campaign is worth playing,i don't know why so much hate.Ok,i also hate futuristic stuff,it's not fun,but the campaign was done ok..Nothing remains,just to wait for COD to go back to present time or more back,to WW.    … Expand
  16. liam11042000
    Jan 11, 2017
    8
    Call of duty is a battle gun type game and has many games come out such as black ops 3 and infinite warfare etc.
    Call of duty infinite warfare is the newest cod (call of duty) and they have also remastered one of the old call of duty 4 (modern warfare)
    There has been many cods that have come out these are only a couple it was all about guns and on the ground combat but now it is all    Call of duty is a battle gun type game and has many games come out such as black ops 3 and infinite warfare etc.
    Call of duty infinite warfare is the newest cod (call of duty) and they have also remastered one of the old call of duty 4 (modern warfare)

    There has been many cods that have come out these are only a couple it was all about guns and on the ground combat but now it is all about flying around and exo suits and that there is also call of duty zombies.

    This is all about getting to the highest round and the box that has all the guns in you spend coins that you collect in the rounds of the undead and spend them on the box to get the best guns like the ray gun or the thunder gun and they destroy anything in their path.

    There are loads of different titles there is black ops, modern warfare, ghosts, infinite warfare, advanced warfare and world at war.    … Expand
  17. Captain_Faramir
    Apr 3, 2017
    8
    8.5 - Decent COD, definitely surprised me when it came out. Maps were creative and varied, although campaign and zombies lacked what the original Cods had.
  18. ZeoN
    Oct 11, 2020
    8
    Tenemos un CoD que ha intentado mejorar lo ya visto en Advanced Warfare y que lo ha conseguido en bastantes aspectos.Combates mapas y armas muy divertidos unidos a grandes novedades y un buen modo zombies.
  19. MonkiReviews
    Sep 30, 2017
    8
    A very enjoyable with one downside. The campaign can be fun, but the story isn't very well thought out. It also has small glitches when playing it. The multiplayer is super fun though. They made so many fun modes, and none are boring. The zombie mode is very interesting, it is especially fun online. The gameplay and graphics are also good. I would easily recommend it, even if the campaignA very enjoyable with one downside. The campaign can be fun, but the story isn't very well thought out. It also has small glitches when playing it. The multiplayer is super fun though. They made so many fun modes, and none are boring. The zombie mode is very interesting, it is especially fun online. The gameplay and graphics are also good. I would easily recommend it, even if the campaign lacks everything else shines.… Expand
  20. rikard131
    Oct 26, 2017
    8
    confusing story i understand it but i dislike ...decent mp pretty good zombies and loads of content...
    however i dont like perk system for zombies (prefer cards) game is called black ops but not hint of anything real in campaign ...mind trips are not black ops really .anyway more than decent fps. i give 8
  21. Greenhunter17
    Sep 29, 2017
    8
    It may not hit it for fans of the Call of Duty franchise but if you truly think about the more newer games without the CoD title, you might just find this game a great, fun and exciting game to that you will enjoy
  22. Joshinatir2200
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    This is one of my favorite COD games! As far as the futuristic gameplay, I think it was better done than IW and AW. So many fun weapons and specialists to use. I spent more time playing this one than any other Call of Duty. The campaign was pretty unique, multiplayer was fast paced and thrilling, and Treyarch really did a fantastic job recovering the zombies after a generally dullThis is one of my favorite COD games! As far as the futuristic gameplay, I think it was better done than IW and AW. So many fun weapons and specialists to use. I spent more time playing this one than any other Call of Duty. The campaign was pretty unique, multiplayer was fast paced and thrilling, and Treyarch really did a fantastic job recovering the zombies after a generally dull experience in BO2 (Tranzit *cringe*).… Expand
  23. Maxttvd
    Jun 18, 2020
    8
    Melhor jogo da franquia no PS4, BO3 tem ótimo multiplayer, melhor co-op da franquia e fraca campanha.
  24. EdJen754
    Mar 2, 2018
    8
    Good campaign and with some heavy themes for a COD. Multiplayer is fast and fun, good graphics too. Zombies mode was too generic though. The best PS4 COD yet.
  25. presider35
    Apr 22, 2018
    8
    ı didnt like story...and yu dont feel cod soul...multi player sometime getting work bad.zombie mode very difficult.but ı like multi player dead match ...
  26. bersi84
    Jan 27, 2020
    8
    I m rating Black Ops 3 solely for its solo player campaign so please be aware of that when you consider buying it. As of today the mutiplayer seems pretty dead, so if you want to get it only consider it for the campaign or possible coop action with Zombies Chronicles. I played this game on my PS4 Pro SSD and would rate the solo campaign 8/10.

    The engine runs smooth although I realized    I m rating Black Ops 3 solely for its solo player campaign so please be aware of that when you consider buying it. As of today the mutiplayer seems pretty dead, so if you want to get it only consider it for the campaign or possible coop action with Zombies Chronicles. I played this game on my PS4 Pro SSD and would rate the solo campaign 8/10.

    The engine runs smooth although I realized smaller frame drops during certain cutscenes. The gameplay itself is very smooth and fluent. No hiccups, no frame drops, no bugs, no bluescreens encountered. The weapon system is very nice. The grade on customization is really cool and the weapons have a really nice feedback. The way you want to play the game, grab the weapon of choice, customize it and go. A minor downrate goes to the unlock system. I know that encourage more gameplay but for the campaign itself it should be possible to unlock all the weapons and be able to use it. That wasnt possible for me which is a bit sad in my opinion.

    Graphics and sound are supreme I have to say. The visual presentation is really good, effects are overwhelming at times and the sound feels right. The sound could be improved a bit I feel. Other games made full use of my atmos system thus bringing immersion even further. Still BO3 does most things right. The levels from time to time giving a nice slice of everything to the player. The developers were creating as usual in finding cool gameplay and interesting stages.

    The story is nothing special although I liked the combination of it without spoiling to much. It felt sci-fi-ish with a rogue like AI and military consiprancy somewhat mixed up a little bit too much. I have to say that at a certain point the story lost me a bit. Character customization is nice, although there are not too many options. You unlock around 10 outfits just by regular gameplay which is very cool to me.

    After all I enjoyed the short but intense trip. I dont care much about multiplayer of CoD games but I still love to play its campaigns when the games are on sale after a while. The price tag of at least 20 bucks is still not cheap considering I didnt play multiplayer. The Zombie Chronicles pays a bit back but it probably all depends on what you like. For me this brings the game to a 8/10.    … Expand
  27. lolones2b
    Mar 1, 2020
    8
    Es un juego muy bueno pero con muchos fallos. La campaña se me hizo irrelevante y aburrida, pero lo que más disfruté fue el modo Zombies, aunque deben tener más consideración con el Local Multijugador; debe ser mejor optimizado.
  28. Chills_Drifting
    Aug 29, 2018
    8
    I got this game when it was free for PS plus members on July, and i do not enjoy the game as i thought i would, but i do enjoy playing it with friends not as team up to winning but as in a few of us 5 to 8 make a private lobby and play among us and enjoy the community game modes, challenge each other and playing the campaign together, but overall i enjoy this game with friends and not solo.
  29. mikemormai
    May 6, 2019
    8
    cara um cod bem legal , joguei umas 50 horas nele , recomendo pra que, curte fps
  30. Titotitan
    Nov 4, 2019
    8
    BO3 is pretty sweet and it's not cause their are double jumps that this game is bad it just makes the game more fast pace and gives you more offensive or defensive tactics. It has nice maps and a nice gun range the campaign actually has a good plot with an intriguing evil. It has a wide range of guns the zombies is really nice offering different mechanics from casual zombies. Overall IBO3 is pretty sweet and it's not cause their are double jumps that this game is bad it just makes the game more fast pace and gives you more offensive or defensive tactics. It has nice maps and a nice gun range the campaign actually has a good plot with an intriguing evil. It has a wide range of guns the zombies is really nice offering different mechanics from casual zombies. Overall I find that this is a very fun game it's nice and offers many hours of enjoyment now I won't give it a 10 as even though it's good it doesn't have really anything that innovates on the series and it could have offered more than it did.… Expand
  31. Patrick73
    Mar 31, 2020
    8
    Call of Duty: Black Ops III è un buon fps arena con idee di gameplay interessanti, rovinato solo dalla scarsa attenzione al volere della community di CoD, che da tempo ormai aveva espresso il desiderio di tornare ad una ambientazione moderna. La storia è molto divertente se giocata con gli amici. La sezione zombie è davvero fantastica e molto divertente da giocare insieme ad altre persone,Call of Duty: Black Ops III è un buon fps arena con idee di gameplay interessanti, rovinato solo dalla scarsa attenzione al volere della community di CoD, che da tempo ormai aveva espresso il desiderio di tornare ad una ambientazione moderna. La storia è molto divertente se giocata con gli amici. La sezione zombie è davvero fantastica e molto divertente da giocare insieme ad altre persone, inoltre la storia dei quattro primis è coinvolgente e molto ben curata, per questo è riuscita ad appassionare migliaia di persone. Anche solo le mappe zombie potevano essere vendute come gioco assestante. Infine bo3 non è il miglior cod ma sicuramente vale il prezzo dell'acquisto.… Expand
  32. TheOneOnlyGuy
    Nov 9, 2019
    8
    I played this game like crazy and i still enjoy it! I love this game a lot because of how much stuff there is to do. Though micro transactions are a pain in this game.
  33. marvsfontanilla
    Mar 31, 2021
    8
    Story: 6
    Graphics: 8
    Sound: 7
    Gameplay: 8
    Game Time: N/A (Online Multiplayer) + PvP
    Duration: 5-6 Hours (Campaign) + MP
  34. NEOROID
    Apr 16, 2020
    8
    This game is quite strange we could say, it follows the typical Call of Duty formula, with a Campaign, a Multiplayer, and a 3rd Gamemode, in this case, Zombies, so I'm going to review them separately, but let's first start with the more technical stuff shall we:

    The gameplay here is great, it all runs smoothly for all platforms, the gunplay is good, the graphics are great as well, even    This game is quite strange we could say, it follows the typical Call of Duty formula, with a Campaign, a Multiplayer, and a 3rd Gamemode, in this case, Zombies, so I'm going to review them separately, but let's first start with the more technical stuff shall we:

    The gameplay here is great, it all runs smoothly for all platforms, the gunplay is good, the graphics are great as well, even five years later the game looks pretty good, and the soundtrack is also great, the only technically bad thing about this game is the AI, which, well, has never been too good let's be honest.

    Campaign:
    Oh boy where to even start? The campaign, while being fun to play, is an absolute mess, the story makes zero sense, it f*cks with your brain for the purpose of f*cking with your brain, no deep storytelling or anything, just a plain mess, and the characters are SOOOOOO forgetable, the plot was interesting at least but the way they excecuted it was absolutely terrible, and has the recognition of Worst CoD campaign ever for that reason. 4/10

    Multiplayer:
    I have some very mixed feelings for multiplayer, as a game it is good, it is well designed, but what about the other stuff? The map design in most maps are pretty good for the jetpack+wall run movement which already took a point away for me, but the visual design for almost every single map is just, way too colorful and with barely any sort of destroyed things around, and doesn't give those WAR atmosphere feeling, taking away the immersion, it feels more like, there are some exceptions of course. The personalization in this game is pretty decent, even though most gear looks... Weird and goofy, but here's where we approach to the thing that takes the most points away, and that, or those are, the infamous Supply Drops, oh my god, when we talk about look crate systems, the worsg one is obviously Black Ops 4, Black Ops 3 is basically Black Ops 4 but a little less aggressive for the player, the weapons are extremely rare and are hidden between THOUSANDS of emotes, emblems, camos, gear, andnother useless sh*t nobody really wants, and while some of those guns absolutely suck, others are way too OP like the MSMC, or well... XMC. Overall, the multiplayer is Fine, I guess, it's mehh. 6/10

    So I already talked about this game in a rather negative point of view, so why do I give this entire game an 8/10? Here's where I spent most of my over-a-thousand-hours of gameplay, and by most I mean... MOST, like 75% or 80%.

    Zombies:
    While the campaign was terrible and the multiplayer was rather mediocre, the Zombies mode is what you could even call a MASTERPIECE, every single thing about the Zombies mode is GOOD, not solid or decent, but GOOD or better than good (except the revelations easter egg steps), there's not a single bad map, Zetsubō no Shima had a pretty rough launch but redeemed itself with patches and updates, turned into one of the best maps of all time, just like the rest of the Black Ops 3 maps, Revelations was a huge nostalgia boner but it was easily the worst of the maps since it brought NOTHING new, Zetsubou no Shima, as I said, turned from trash to great, Shadows of Evil is arguebly the best free map, The Giant is the definition of a PERFECT remaster, and Gorod Krovi and Der Eisendrache turned into fan favourites and INSTANT CLASSICS, and the same goes for the easter eggs, the map design in most maps is perfect for high rounds, and the gobblegums are a great addition for Easter Egg hunt, that made it easier and more enjoyable, the maps also tell players that being lazy is gonna bring DEATH to them, because most of the wonderweapon builds are quite the puzzles, and that effort is rewarded with AMAZING wonderweapons, the only exceptions of buldable WWs are: Raygun MK3 (Gorod Krovi), Apothicon Servant (Revelations), Thunder Gun (Revelations), Ragnarok Spikes (Revelations), Wunderwaffe (The Giant). The Easter Eggs are also amazing with the exception of Revelations, which was disappointing for a finale to BO3Z, but the rest are great, the bossfights were fun as hell, especially the GK boss and the DE boss, and so is the Lore behind them, including Revelations, which is a perfect buildup for the Black Ops 4 plot. But that is not it, oh no it is not it, the Characters are, unlike the campaign, extremely memorable and iconic, AL OF THEM, especially the primis crew of course, and that's still not it, the final DLC for BO3 was a 30€ DLC pack that contained 8 REMASTERED MAPS, 30€ was at first a conteoversial price, but the controversy didn't last long because The Giant costs 5€, 5 x 8 = 40, we got a price lower than the value of that DLC pack, and did it pay off? Absolutely, the remasters were perfect, and you could even say that they were better than the original maps because of the BO3 engine, which felt like it was literally made for Zombies. 10/10    … Expand
  35. ItzChristian25
    Sep 24, 2020
    8
    This game is very good but i do not like the jetpacks and the anti gravity gameplay
  36. MatheusBug007
    Jun 30, 2020
    8
    apesar de ser futurista não tem como negar que o jogo é muito bom e bem feito
  37. tariq_almandhar
    Aug 16, 2020
    8
    لعبة لشركة يبدو أنها صنعت لعبة لا أنكر أنها جيدة لكن لا أستطيع القول أنها وصلت إلى مستوى التوقعات
  38. FRIST_008
    Nov 8, 2021
    8
    + Озвучка и сам перевод настолько ущербный, будто его делали через Гугл переводчик, причем без знаков восклицая или вопроса в нужных местах. Зато они научились делать отличную тактильную отдачу от стрельбы. Голливуд на этот раз сконцентрировали в самом конце, экстаз на час, это прямо уровень. Жалко, что по остальной игре уровни не так красивы. Но скучно не будет, игра содержит прямо+ Озвучка и сам перевод настолько ущербный, будто его делали через Гугл переводчик, причем без знаков восклицая или вопроса в нужных местах. Зато они научились делать отличную тактильную отдачу от стрельбы. Голливуд на этот раз сконцентрировали в самом конце, экстаз на час, это прямо уровень. Жалко, что по остальной игре уровни не так красивы. Но скучно не будет, игра содержит прямо порядочно интересных боссов, которые заставят по потерь даже на среднем уровне сложности.
    - стрельба на 9
    - сюжет 8
    - красивый Голливуд 9
    - перевод 6
    - удобство прокачки 8
    Итого 8 (или 8.5 если играть на инглише)    … Expand
  39. Dinerofresco
    May 5, 2021
    8
    This game, everybody hates it but I loved the multi-player, story and if your a zombie fan then I feel this is one of the best cods for zombies in my opinion
  40. whyyhere
    Nov 8, 2021
    8
    take it from 9 year old growing on cod games
    the game is fun with friends if y alone (just like me) i recommnd to play zombie with random
    multiplayer is not bod or meh is like good cuz of packages is so op like bruh
    campaign dont play it only if y a trophy hunter
    (tip : if y getting the game get all the zombie maps because they are dope )
  41. Rhex98
    Jul 9, 2023
    8
    El black ops definitivo, el juego con más variedad de mapas de zombies de todos, incluye mapas de black ops 1 y 2 más los propios de este juego, haciendo así la versión definitiva para jugar zombies, la cantidad de horas que le metí fue insana. Eso si estos mapas están disponibles por medio de dlc por lo cual los tienes que comprar aparte del juego base.
  42. Agt_Killionaire
    Oct 7, 2022
    8
    This was a time where the COD developers spent more time for endless activities over a story. The story for this game I liked but it is not worth it. The main attraction is zombies and multiplayer. The advanced movement is a lot more refined in this game allowing for a lot of fluidity.
  43. CommanderIW
    Nov 9, 2022
    8
    Multiplayer war sehr gut wenn auch am pc sehr schwitzig, Story solide und der Zombie Modus 10/10
  44. bramchvh
    Feb 10, 2023
    8
    The campaign holds this game back heavily. It is so boring but the rest of the game is so good. The multiplayer is really fun. The movement had never been done better and wall running around your friends has never been more fun. The zombies is also by far the strongest it had been. It is very consistend with every map being a masterpiece in its own right.
  45. Razv
    Nov 9, 2015
    7
    This game proves that you can't count on the User Score, ever. It's only being used to prove a point, and not to actually rate the quality of the games.

    For a game like this, however big your standards are, it's not a zero, a one or a two. It simply isn't. Let's say you think the gameplay hasn't improved, it's not zero. Let's say you think the graphics are not up to par with other games    This game proves that you can't count on the User Score, ever. It's only being used to prove a point, and not to actually rate the quality of the games.

    For a game like this, however big your standards are, it's not a zero, a one or a two. It simply isn't. Let's say you think the gameplay hasn't improved, it's not zero. Let's say you think the graphics are not up to par with other games of its generation, it's not zero.

    Too bad that a User Score section can't actually be used properly.    … Expand
  46. Zlatan
    Nov 7, 2015
    7
    In short. If you hated MW multiplayer and the calculated lag then keep walking. YES STIL NO DEDICATED SERVERS ON CONSOLES. "LAG". AGAIN THEY LIED AGAIN..... The good thing is that there is more content. But the corporate overlords won regarding calculated lag.It a shame as treyarc is a good developer.....
  47. SchroederRock
    Nov 13, 2015
    7
    This is lengthy, so skip to the end if you just want a summary. Black Ops 3 is a tough decision for me in terms of rating. In terms of the campaign, it has a bland start that had me asking a lot of fundamental questions that should have been better answered just by playing the game. It isn't until mission 4 that things start to heat up a bit in terms of the fun-factor, but the story isThis is lengthy, so skip to the end if you just want a summary. Black Ops 3 is a tough decision for me in terms of rating. In terms of the campaign, it has a bland start that had me asking a lot of fundamental questions that should have been better answered just by playing the game. It isn't until mission 4 that things start to heat up a bit in terms of the fun-factor, but the story is still a bit buried. Then, around the halfway mark, things start to click and Black Ops 3 takes off on a roller coaster ride that I've come to expect from this arm of the franchise. The ending had me asking a lot of questions, but when I sought out answers, it made a LOT of sense and makes me understand why certain events in the game transpired the way they did (AFTER you’ve beaten the campaign, read the very first quick-scroll mission statement text that appears during those black screens. They’re on YouTube and, if you slow it down to 25% play speed, you can play/pause your way through it and find an extremely interesting piece of info there. Again, AFTER you beat the game go find this). There is some room for interpretation, but the theories I arrived at connected all the dots extremely well. Do not judge this story until you've done this for yourself, or you'll stamp poor writing in spots that are actually clever writing. The scope of the gameplay while unfolding the story is a nice addition, but the added wall running and thrust jumping take a back seat more often and it's the DNI augmentations that give a soldier super-human powers that really shines here. For the campaign, it nearly blew me away from start to end, but the fractured first few missions pulls it out of "amazing" territory and into the "above-average" category. I haven't spent much time with zombies, but I will say this: beating the campaign is important as it unlocks the Nightmares mode where you rehash certain campaign levels with zombies in them instead of your soldier & robot enemies. Playing the first iteration was interesting since it meshes a lot of stuff of your typical zombies with a new somewhat-altered storyline. But it isn’t amazing because it’s all retreaded story missions with a voice-over narrative that tries to fit what’s already there, making it feel like a hashed together plan rather than a uniquely-crafted bonus feature. As for the multiplayer, it's a mixed bag. Treyarch largely keeps everything you've seen in previous Call of Duty titles, but the new opportunities for movement get left by the wayside too often. I wanted a mixed Titanfall experience with the honed MP build of Call of Duty. You get much more of the later than the former. The new Specialist classes are a nice addition to the mix, but once you get outside of your thrusters and specialist abilities it's just CoD as usual. Not one map feels like the fun playground you'd get on Titanfall, where the mindset of "if you see it, you can play on/with it" makes for a very changing battleground that keeps your head on a swivel better than any other shooter thus-far. Add the terrible decision of using hybrid servers (part dedicated/part player hosted) and a complete meltdown in terms of online sustainability - something that is frustrating a majority of gamers out of the gate with BO3, and my playtime of Black Ops 3 feels stymied. DLC is $50 for a seasons pass, $15 per installment (4 DLC packs total). You’re getting the usual 4 maps & a zombie expansion. The problem is that games like Halo 5 are offering DLC for free and Destiny figured out how $40 can fund an entire year’s worth of DLC, including the first major expansion (The Taken King) and using micro transactions that are not required to fund the extra nuances of the game. This makes Black Ops 3 DLC look insignificant and scam’ish. –SUMMARY-- Black Ops 3 is another mind-bending tale that requires all of your attention to figure out the storyline. The attention to detail is almost consistent across the game’s 11 missions, but a faulty starting left me wanting a bit more. Once I got to the multiplayer, I again found myself with a desire for more. Call of Duty isn’t busting out of its shell that is really starting to hold it back, but the cracks in the hull suggest Activision is considering the possibility of pushing the limits. I can’t recommend the title, but I won’t deter anyone from it either. I just wish there was more of a playground feel to it all – that would make it a lot more fun. Of course, if you want the worst news of all: Ghosts 2 is supposed to be up next for CoD. Ghosts was an abomination of a game and nobody is looking forward to that polished turd of a game.… Expand
  48. barym
    Dec 1, 2015
    7
    Since the COD series burst onto the scene with the critically acclaimed COD4:Modern Warfare, I was won over but the yearly installments and the focus of online multiplayer, complacency has crept in. The Modern Warfare iterations all become to samey, but what they were doing with the Black Ops was a bit more interesting. NOT ANYMORE!!! Campaign is boring garbage. It has become the same asSince the COD series burst onto the scene with the critically acclaimed COD4:Modern Warfare, I was won over but the yearly installments and the focus of online multiplayer, complacency has crept in. The Modern Warfare iterations all become to samey, but what they were doing with the Black Ops was a bit more interesting. NOT ANYMORE!!! Campaign is boring garbage. It has become the same as the Modern Warfare/ Advanced Warfare titles. But the positives are that there is something here for for everybody who likes their FPS COD-flavoured.
    There is Campaign or co-op Campaign, there's the normal Multiplayer suite and then there is Zombies.
    So, there's a lot of content, but to get the most of it- you'll have to purchase the season pass.
    'Ive given the game a 7, because unlike alot of users I don't have ulterior motive.    … Expand
  49. GodoteX
    Nov 18, 2017
    7
    I can very easily and quickly summarize the new Call of Duty. Treyarch and everything is clear. The long campaign (even two), a lot of fun in multiplayer mode and extended Zombie.
  50. actionist83
    Aug 2, 2018
    7
    REVIEWING SINGLE PLAYER CAMPAIGN ONLY:

    What can I say about the campaign? Not much. The level design and gameplay was fun and introduced some new ideas. The characters were painfully generic, and the story had a lot of potential; yet just couldn’t deliver the narrative in a way that made any sense.
  51. criticguy22
    Nov 21, 2015
    7
    The Call Of Duty series has been an extremely "opinionated" franchise throughout these past years, and BO3 makes no exception.
    This is a good, good game. It has so many things going for it. The graphics are most notably the most amped, filled with juicy colour and saturation, unlike the blue, depressing visuals we saw in all past installments. The gameply, as usual, hasn't changed much.    The Call Of Duty series has been an extremely "opinionated" franchise throughout these past years, and BO3 makes no exception.
    This is a good, good game. It has so many things going for it. The graphics are most notably the most amped, filled with juicy colour and saturation, unlike the blue, depressing visuals we saw in all past installments. The gameply, as usual, hasn't changed much. I don't even think I need to explain why. Same shooting mechanics, same multiplayer, the usual. And the campaign is arguably better with some close friends than on your own. And more contents keeps piling onto the roster.

    However, all that being said, BO3 honestly is another shooting game. All content aside, the game lays out as a basic futuristic shooter. It's a great game, but not exactly enough to qualify it being worth all of your money. But at least it's not Ghosts!    … Expand
  52. p1menta
    Jul 18, 2018
    7
    less of a cliche than all other CoD put together, but still kinda dumb.
    i cant actually see how can these games be so overrated. it should be fun for an afternon, not considered such a game as it is.
    the AI sucks so bad it gives me cringes every 2sec.
    but again, still better than the others i've played
  53. bulletchan
    Apr 11, 2016
    7
    Very fun co-op campaign including a Nightmare mode with zombies. Multiplayer is very fun, fluid, great customization tools, great and detailed maps fleeing a bit of sense of futurism that the game it's proposed (this brings nostalgia for those who enjoy the old cods). And then there's a lot of content to unlock. Amazing, one of the best COD ever.
  54. newb
    Jul 14, 2018
    7
    great multiplayer experience hampered by balancing issues and unjustifiable lag issues. once again cod zombies is exceptional. however the campaign is sh*t don't even try it.
  55. sgy0003
    Nov 9, 2015
    7
    Is this another same **** as the year before? No. Is it fun to play? Yes. Can it get stupid sometimes?.....Yes. I can safely say this is Advanced Warfare done right. The thruster pack parkour can be really fun, but with the enclosed space in both campaign and multiplayer, I found them to be pointless. Campaign is rather forgettable. There are cutscenes here and there with flashy imagesIs this another same **** as the year before? No. Is it fun to play? Yes. Can it get stupid sometimes?.....Yes. I can safely say this is Advanced Warfare done right. The thruster pack parkour can be really fun, but with the enclosed space in both campaign and multiplayer, I found them to be pointless. Campaign is rather forgettable. There are cutscenes here and there with flashy images that makes feel like having a seizure. Multiplayer, as always, do not have the ground for the decent players. You are either really good or terrible. There is no middle area. Zombies on the other hand, is really fun to play. Maybe it's because it's the only game mode that does not have thruster pack, therefore keeping the traditional gameplay, or due to the fact that setting is in Noir style Chicago, but they really did a great job with Zombies… Expand
  56. NMFreed
    Feb 7, 2016
    7
    Betrayal. War. Guns. It's a tale as old as time. Literally.

    In Call of Duty: Black Ops III, you play as a soldier fighting a war some 50 years into the future. While in a firefight, you get yourself pretty messed up by a robot and are in need of some heavy cybernetic enhancements. This is where the campaign of Black Ops III takes off. The first thing you'll notice is how darn pretty    Betrayal. War. Guns. It's a tale as old as time. Literally.

    In Call of Duty: Black Ops III, you play as a soldier fighting a war some 50 years into the future. While in a firefight, you get yourself pretty messed up by a robot and are in need of some heavy cybernetic enhancements. This is where the campaign of Black Ops III takes off.

    The first thing you'll notice is how darn pretty it is. Sparks fly off of walls, guns are heavily detailed and refined and the characters and cutscenes move seamlessly in and out of live gameplay.

    Voice acting is superb and the acting is at peak COD form, bringing in Hollywood talent like Christopher Meloni and Ron Perlman and coupling them with the best of the best in video game voice acting, like Nolan North. Also, Seattle Seahawks player Marshawn Lynch is totally in this game.

    The campaign clocks in anywhere from six to eight hours depending on difficulty level, though difficulty isn't much more than a few more enemies that seem to be able to see you through walls, cars, ten feet of concrete, etc. It can be awfully frustrating.

    But let's be honest, you showed up for the multiplayer.

    Taking notes from the Multiplayer Battle Online Arena genre, or MOBA, Black Ops III introduces Specialists, essentially hero characters that the player will unlock over time. When you boot up multiplayer for the first time, you'll select your first hero and that's where your character base starts.

    There's Outrider whose equipped with a superpowered crossbow, Ruin, your typical cybernetic soldier, Prophet, specializing in energy weapons, and a handful of others.

    With rumors that Treyarch and Activision plan to support Black Ops III with two years of content, one would expect new heroes to show their faces over time. It's kind of ingenious actually, and gives the game legs.
    The rest of what you'd expect is also here. The multiplayer suite is packed with core, hardcore and bonus game types, including Team Deathmatch, Domination, Kill Confirmed and my personal favorite, Gun Game (players cycle through timed weapons and have to basically be great with every one of them.)

    Create-a-Class is back, along with Gunsmith, a studio that allows you to completely customize your weapons. Though, you may want to refrain from painting anything phallic or obscene on your guns. Oh, and Scorestreaks are back too, rewarding players for collecting kills without dying.
    New to the series is Black Market, a mode that uses in-game currency called 'Cryptokeys' for random supply drops. Players can purchase said drops and gain some cool weapon, attachment or equipment loot. Borrowing from games like Borderlands and Destiny, some of the loot may be rare, though that's totally up in the air.

    Ten Cryptokeys net you a common supply drop and 30 will score you a rare one, and yes, they do seem a lot like microtransactions. The thing is, you can't actually use real money to buy these, though that can always change in a future update.

    And if campaign and multiplayer just aren't enough, Black Ops III brings back the ever-lovable Zombies mode, which is a blast to play with friends. There's also a new Freerun mode, which is kind of like a poor-man's Mirror's Edge. You can run on walls, jump and roll and act like a total badass, but you can do that in multiplayer as well.

    Overall, Black Ops III packs a lot of punch for its $60 entry fee. With tons of content planned for at least the next year and already so much stuffed into the game, it's more than worth it. The campaign and multiplayer offer new, exciting experiences that the last few entries have lacked.
    Sure, the game is a far cry (heh) from the golden age of the series, but it's still fun. And at the end of the day, what more can we ask for from a video game?

    - Nicholas Friedman, The Dallas Morning News    … Expand
  57. Voodoo123
    Aug 15, 2019
    7
    +Exceptional CBR visuals on ps4 pro
    +Excellent sci-fi plot
    +Great cast deliver memorable performances +Interesting spread of abilities to mix up gameplay choices -Core gameplay tenants mostly unchanged from rest of series Got this on my ps plus free game and had it in the library for ages.... finally got around to playing and was simply blown away by the quality of the SP campaigns    +Exceptional CBR visuals on ps4 pro
    +Excellent sci-fi plot
    +Great cast deliver memorable performances
    +Interesting spread of abilities to mix up gameplay choices
    -Core gameplay tenants mostly unchanged from rest of series

    Got this on my ps plus free game and had it in the library for ages.... finally got around to playing and was simply blown away by the quality of the SP campaigns production value. To produce visuals at this level and mostly locked 60fps (30 fps in majority in realtime engine cutscenes) is nothing short of a technical marvel.... I was often reminded me of perfect dark N64 in a good way as even though it nearly always led to the same core COD gameplay flow, the 'sci-fi' visuals in BLOPS 3 are at times simply stunning. Overall this impressed me far more than I could've anticipated and so I would recommend playing this SP campaign to any shooter fan. MP? Not tried so couldnt say.... This review is purely based on the SP campaign. Now imagine yourself in a frozen forest...    … Expand
  58. Bastrix
    Jan 7, 2016
    7
    I haven't played COD for a while now, I'm not a fanboy of anything, and I'm no hater. This game could've been a lot better IMO but it doesn't deserve any of those stupid low scores.

    Campaign is good but not great, with an overly complex and confusing story, nothing really new, nice graphics, nice performance and of course the greatest thing for me is that it's coop. I expected a lot    I haven't played COD for a while now, I'm not a fanboy of anything, and I'm no hater. This game could've been a lot better IMO but it doesn't deserve any of those stupid low scores.

    Campaign is good but not great, with an overly complex and confusing story, nothing really new, nice graphics, nice performance and of course the greatest thing for me is that it's coop. I expected a lot more of intense action though and less story telling. Fun overall but could be a lot better.

    Multiplayer is solid, It's fast paced and handles as expected. Although I feel like the Light Machine Guns are useless, because they are so slow to aim with and since in this multiplayer most of the time tis about how fast you can aim when coming face to face with an enemy. However I really prefer other games when it comes to multiplayer, there are no vehicles and most of the combat is in small levels and close encounters.

    +Having coop campaign is the reason I got this game
    +Nice graphics and performance
    +Solid multiplayer

    -I found SEVERAL BUGS in the campaign, really bad ones
    -Lacks intense action in campaign + too much useless story telling
    -Gets boring quick    … Expand
  59. joaopontesvaz
    Dec 7, 2017
    7
    Graphics: 7.0 Sound: 8.2 Gameplay: 8.4 Fun/Story: 7.0

    Despite COF franchise seemed tired this was a good game, above the other of the series. Good gameplay and a stable framerate.
  60. Turtle70428
    Apr 5, 2016
    7
    Eh, what can I say, does it suck complete bollocks? No. Is it flooded with micro-transactions that will manipulate kids into stealing their mother's credit cards? Sure, why not. The gameplay is just as solid as any other call of duty, the story is weak, but what did we expect? Zombies is a hit or miss. You either love it or hate it. Hate it for being over complicated with their **** fetchEh, what can I say, does it suck complete bollocks? No. Is it flooded with micro-transactions that will manipulate kids into stealing their mother's credit cards? Sure, why not. The gameplay is just as solid as any other call of duty, the story is weak, but what did we expect? Zombies is a hit or miss. You either love it or hate it. Hate it for being over complicated with their **** fetch quests or you'll love it for their **** fetch quests. Free run will entertain you for a few minutes, nothing major. Multiplayer is filled with try-hards trying to reach max prestige. And why the **** does everything need a competitive mode now?! It seems rushed and tacked on, there is some potential here still.… Expand
  61. awsmpineapple
    Nov 6, 2015
    7
    I do not understand why someone would just give black ops a 0, thats just meaningless and disrupts the real reviews out there. You should not be allowed to post reviews on these games...
    Back on track;
    I really feel like Black Ops 3 brings some new interesting features to the black ops series. I have not played call of duty for a while due to really bad reviews, but i can not seem to    I do not understand why someone would just give black ops a 0, thats just meaningless and disrupts the real reviews out there. You should not be allowed to post reviews on these games...
    Back on track;
    I really feel like Black Ops 3 brings some new interesting features to the black ops series. I have not played call of duty for a while due to really bad reviews, but i can not seem to understand what they are doing so wrong. Sadly i will not give more than 7/10. The Multiplayer part of the game is still a bit dull, but i love the new customization features of the weapons. I also love zombies, and thats my main argument for buying this game. Call of duty: Zombies could be an own title with all these maps refurbished sometime, and i would certainly give that more than 7/10... If you liked the other call of duty games, this game is for you. Go buy it! If your not quite sure yet, just wait for the sales. But if you do not like the game at all, just stay clear of the game, AND the reviews. Peace out!    … Expand
  62. ryuzo7980
    Nov 7, 2015
    7
    Im not Call of Duty fan. Im not playing Call of Duty since Modern Warfare 3. I played Black Ops 3 multiplayer beta. That is why I decided to buy this game. But I little dissapointed. "THE MASSIVE AND AMBITIOUS GAME IN CALL OF DUTY HISTORY " felling like just shooting action with maps pack. Campaign just ok nothing more. There is no EPIC moments like in first Black Ops, Modern Warfare 2.Im not Call of Duty fan. Im not playing Call of Duty since Modern Warfare 3. I played Black Ops 3 multiplayer beta. That is why I decided to buy this game. But I little dissapointed. "THE MASSIVE AND AMBITIOUS GAME IN CALL OF DUTY HISTORY " felling like just shooting action with maps pack. Campaign just ok nothing more. There is no EPIC moments like in first Black Ops, Modern Warfare 2. Black Ops 3 campaign is just ok. Play it and forget it. Even you playing with coop feature. People who choosing the PS3/360 edition loses NOTHING. Zombies mode is ok. But it looks just like Black Ops Zombies with some new features.
    Multiplayer is decent. I enjoy it. But there is small amount of content. Only 12 maps, small amount of guns, customs, really dissappointing. Skin customization is interesting feature but doesnt make any sense for me (really, Im not like that stupid camouflaging stuff) And last its good when I can play with bots ^_^ (sorry Im not so good in PVP, I need more training)

    Overall its 7. Its ok game. Good gameplay but small amount ot of content. This is game is not feel like AAA game. And absolutely not worth a 60 dollars    … Expand
  63. Hyperbomb180
    Nov 8, 2015
    7
    Some of the issues have either been tweaked or maybe the connection just got better over time. But, it's a lot more enjoyable to play now. I gave this game a 3 at first,
  64. leopoldo
    Dec 3, 2015
    7
    Call of Duty: Black Ops III was a game I was very excited before the release because everything in BO2 was great, but unfortunately was not what happened in that game. The story has no connection with the BO2, but at least it is Ok. The gameplay in the campaign is very simple, with nothing remarkable or different. At least the multiplayer is great fun, even remembering very AdvancedCall of Duty: Black Ops III was a game I was very excited before the release because everything in BO2 was great, but unfortunately was not what happened in that game. The story has no connection with the BO2, but at least it is Ok. The gameplay in the campaign is very simple, with nothing remarkable or different. At least the multiplayer is great fun, even remembering very Advanced Warfare, but has very leg.O zombies mode is better than ever. Call of Duty: Black Ops III could be one of the best CoD, but uninteresting campaign, and the leg of the game will not let that happen, at least the zombies mode is incredible. 7/10… Expand
  65. Tonka13
    Jan 4, 2016
    7
    I don't bother with the story lines or zombies, just the multiplayer. It plays ok but the different characters take some getting used to. The things that turn me off are the fact this is set in the future (as opposed to to the old COD / MW series), the characters are somewhat Japanese in look and feel and the games end with some silly taunts. In all this seems to be aimed at a youngerI don't bother with the story lines or zombies, just the multiplayer. It plays ok but the different characters take some getting used to. The things that turn me off are the fact this is set in the future (as opposed to to the old COD / MW series), the characters are somewhat Japanese in look and feel and the games end with some silly taunts. In all this seems to be aimed at a younger audience than previous COD games. The weapons are, as always, imaginative and there's some good ones in this package, so overall it's worth getting. I just wish they'd return to some of the older outdoor maps and eras to make sniping more challenging.… Expand
  66. Sky-Line___
    Jun 19, 2016
    7
    For the lazy guys :
    - Campaign : 3/10
    - Zombies : 7/10 - Multiplayer : 7/10 - General aspects & content : 6.5/10 Campaign mode is the big problem of this game, it suffers of poor textures and the story is very strange, bad narrated and boring. IA is dumb as hell, and the special abilities of your character are totally useless in-game. It becomes even worse when you discover that you    For the lazy guys :
    - Campaign : 3/10
    - Zombies : 7/10
    - Multiplayer : 7/10
    - General aspects & content : 6.5/10

    Campaign mode is the big problem of this game, it suffers of poor textures and the story is very strange, bad narrated and boring. IA is dumb as hell, and the special abilities of your character are totally useless in-game. It becomes even worse when you discover that you have a constant wallhack-ability that you can use during the whole campaign, it kills immersion and element of surprise. There are a lot of graphic and technical bugs. Dialogues are the worst part of this game (for example, your character speaks and suddenly his voice becomes very different and louder, like if they changed their micros to record the voices during the development of the game), so is audio mixing in general, but I played it in French, it may be better in English. Some missions are repetitive (especially the last one which feels like a mix of all the other ones)

    Zombie mode feels immediately better. The only big problem is that the game came out with 2 maps but you had to pay the expensive $80-90 edition to get the 2 of them. I don't like day-one DLCs.
    It remains a cool mode and the fans love it. I, personally, am less hyped because I prefer a "simple" zombie with the main aim of doing as many rounds as possible, but in BO3, they decided to work on a lot of details and there's a lot of stuff to do in this zombie mode. Secret rooms, riddles to solve, portals, special types of zombies, and so on, I have to admit that it is positive and it gives TreyArch some credit, it fills the gap of their poor Campaign mode.
    The general atmosphere is amazing in zombie mode, great sounds, amazing colors, and it is perfectly fluid. More specifically, like I said the map vast, but I'm not a fan of its particular architecture, they can do better and they proved it in the past on WAW, BO1 & BO2.

    Multiplayer stays a reference, but is far to be perfect.
    The first big problem: the maps all feel the same, 3-rows maps which ruins rush opportunities in modes like S&D and which encourages people to camp more.
    Second problem: Killstreaks, in game modes like domination, they are easy to unlock and lead to a real mess on smaller maps
    Third problem: What happened to the sniper rifles ? They feel weird and are less enjoyable.
    The specialists are a good innovation but some of them shouldn't exist, like the one which allows you to be almost invincible during a short time.
    Another big problem is matchmaking, if you don't play with friends, in most of the cases, the games will be really unbalanced. It may be common to every other FPS, but IMO it is more pronounced in BO3. Weapons balance also remains problematic, but not as much as in Advanced Warfare.
    Finally, hardcore mode is still neglected, and the 3-rows maps ruin S&D even more.

    In more general aspects, the game is very fluid (60 fps), the weapons are beautifully designed and every single accessory is modelled, which is great. However, graphics are getting old in Campaign mode and are not revolutionary in the other modes (but let's be clear, it still looks good in Zombie mode and Multiplayer mode)    … Expand
  67. Phangled5
    Nov 6, 2015
    7
    Giving this game a zero is silly, BUT giving a blind 10 is just as dumb.

    In my opinion it is a good game but not great. Campaign is best enjoyed with friends and multiplayer is decent. I am not a fan of the movement and special abilities. Graphics and frame rate is excellent, better than halo. With my personal favorite zormbies mode, the game will definitley be worth it for some,    Giving this game a zero is silly, BUT giving a blind 10 is just as dumb.

    In my opinion it is a good game but not great. Campaign is best enjoyed with friends and multiplayer is decent. I am not a fan of the movement and special abilities. Graphics and frame rate is excellent, better than halo.

    With my personal favorite zormbies mode, the game will definitley be worth it for some, lots of content.

    For me however, i just don't like he movement. Advanced warfare was a fun change, but i wanted black ops 3 to have normal movement.    … Expand
  68. BLUDsream
    Nov 8, 2015
    7
    For someone on the edge about buying Black Ops 3.

    I was on the edge about playing Black Ops 3 I was so far on the edge I didn't even want to play the open beta because I was so disappointed in Ghost and Advanced Warfare. But I was lucky enough for my friend to buy it and invite me over to play it. *Campaign Pros - It's Co-op up to 4 players - If you beat it you unlock a new mode    For someone on the edge about buying Black Ops 3.

    I was on the edge about playing Black Ops 3 I was so far on the edge I didn't even want to play the open beta because I was so disappointed in Ghost and Advanced Warfare.
    But I was lucky enough for my friend to buy it and invite me over to play it.

    *Campaign
    Pros - It's Co-op up to 4 players
    - If you beat it you unlock a new mode

    Cons - it's pretty dull for the most part
    - confusing story
    - forgettable experience

    *Multiplayer (The bread and butter of any call of duty game now)
    Pros - Levels/Maps design is very good (didn't have a map I actually hated to play on
    - guns for the most part feel balanced
    - Pick 10 class customization is back as it has become a fan favorite.
    - Very fluid and smooth. (game runs fine like it should)
    -The new Trust movement is more floaty and not like Advanced Warfare's instant super jumps and flying through areas. But still is fast enough to use to reach and get to places fast and steady and doesn't seem as required to use as its just as easy to just basically run(boots on the ground) and do fine.
    - wall running is only really used as a flank

    Cons - Day1/week1 connection issues(this should not still be a thing) not finding matches or over all not connecting to the servers sometimes.
    - Hit detection is still noticeable at times were hits that should land don't and hits that are clearly off to the side do hit
    -some of the specialist abilities just feel lackluster and overall pointless to use compared to some of the others

    *Zombies
    Pros - Well who doesnt like a good old survivial mode
    - new strange abilities like turning into a beast
    - the one map that is given is nice

    Cons - only one map.....(its big but still why only one)

    *Other
    Cons - Season pass **** as if this series hasn't already made enough money you still have to pay $50 more for more maps(you can't justify this fanboys)
    - Pre-order bonus (its just a map that has already been made 5 years ago so why not just put it in the main game and not as day one dlc)

    *final verdict
    7/10
    If you're still a CoD fan I would say buy it but if you are looking for a Call of Duty that could hook you back in than I'm not sure what to say to you. This game is solid but that's it. It doesn't do anything new at all.    … Expand
  69. PeterAlexander
    May 28, 2018
    7
    Although it is one of the more colourful games of the Call of Duty franchise, and takes some positives from Black Ops 2, it ultimately has the worst campaign and a mediocre multiplayer. However, it is its zombies made that saves this game. The introduction of some of the best ever maps, as well as the inclusion of many classics, ensure that Black Ops 3 has the best zombies instalment to date.
  70. ReakingHavok
    Nov 20, 2015
    7
    Going to keep this short, this game is a solid 7.5, would give it an 8 if the spawns wern't so bad. I really hate that people abuse the user rating just as much as i hate that paid critics up the review with **** post to up the score. this is call of duty, not titan fall. there is no reason anyone should be giving this game such a low rating. i was actually expecting this game to be justGoing to keep this short, this game is a solid 7.5, would give it an 8 if the spawns wern't so bad. I really hate that people abuse the user rating just as much as i hate that paid critics up the review with **** post to up the score. this is call of duty, not titan fall. there is no reason anyone should be giving this game such a low rating. i was actually expecting this game to be just as bad as advanced warefare but i got pleasently surprised that the game play was actually decent. i dont care how bad people on here say that the graphics arnt great but in reality this is the best looking call of duty by far. it looks better than most new games but not anywhere near some games. people that bash on the graphics are probably the same ones saying that fallout 4's arnt that bad when really they look like the game was made in 2007. this game is nothing like titan fall other then a few spots on each map where you can run on a wall to get to another spot in or around buildings and other types of cover, it not like you can scale whole building like in titanfall. the game is better than halo, not better than blops 2, but the best online shooter on the xbox one and ps4 and next year when ghost 2 or god forbid.....another modern warfare comes out this game will get more praise because IW and sledgehammer suck at makeing call of duties.… Expand
  71. badgerryan19
    Jun 19, 2017
    7
    Surprisingly another step forward for COD. Bringing in another solid campaign and multiplayer to the table. Yes there are many re used stuff and what not, but it can be fun at times.
  72. HENCHMAN
    Nov 17, 2015
    7
    There is nothing amazing about this game. It's a bit like the iPhone, add a few new features each year and charge the same price. I don't think it's the developers fault as much as it is consumers for buying it each year. COD was amazing at first but there is only so much you can do to make it better each year. They will keep making one each year as long as we keep buying so untilThere is nothing amazing about this game. It's a bit like the iPhone, add a few new features each year and charge the same price. I don't think it's the developers fault as much as it is consumers for buying it each year. COD was amazing at first but there is only so much you can do to make it better each year. They will keep making one each year as long as we keep buying so until something revolutionary and amazing happens to this franchise, I'll be playing this one. I will give them credit for beefing up campaign this year, it felt like they put more effort in and it was enjoyable. The story was decent, but what makes a game valuable to me is mostly content as in a decent campaign that is challenging, will keep me engaged and take some time to beat.… Expand
  73. Seanabon
    Apr 21, 2016
    7
    I seriously don't understand all the hate. The campaign is just ok (better with friends), but everything else is pretty solid. The guns and movement feel great, the game looks amazing, and multiplayer is a blast. Playing on the couch with a friend is really where the game shines though. 1v1ing and shooting up zombies with a buddy provides nearly endless fun.

    But in all honesty there    I seriously don't understand all the hate. The campaign is just ok (better with friends), but everything else is pretty solid. The guns and movement feel great, the game looks amazing, and multiplayer is a blast. Playing on the couch with a friend is really where the game shines though. 1v1ing and shooting up zombies with a buddy provides nearly endless fun.

    But in all honesty there isn't anything special here. It's a fast paced arcady shooter with minimal thought or strategy involved during gameplay. Sure, it's fun to shoot up some people in multiplayer for a bit, but, typical to cod games, it has no real depth.

    All in all, there's a lot of fun to be had, but the game itself really isn't that great.    … Expand
  74. Nanks33
    Nov 6, 2015
    7
    Are people buying this game just to give it a zero? If you hate it so much why are you here? You know what this game is gonna be about by now folks. I've played probably every COD. Started playing MP with MWarfare. My opinion is these games have sort of become something else over the years. It is almost as if they should not carry the same name. If you played COD 3 and then played BLOPS3Are people buying this game just to give it a zero? If you hate it so much why are you here? You know what this game is gonna be about by now folks. I've played probably every COD. Started playing MP with MWarfare. My opinion is these games have sort of become something else over the years. It is almost as if they should not carry the same name. If you played COD 3 and then played BLOPS3 and were told it was the same title you would be shocked just because the whole vibe and feel has changed so much. That said...
    I am enjoying the MP experience this go around. It does not feel like Blops1 or 2 but it is a better feel than AW that is for sure. I think some of the maps are really great and some are pretty awful. I dislike how the maps have become this "every room must have 6 entrances" thing so nobody can camp. I personally don't camp because I think it's boring. But you should be able to take a breather in a space and form a new plan w/o 4 people shooting you in the back. That is how real world spaces are made. 1 maybe 2 entrances and some available cover. I think that aspect of COD has been lost. I don't care much for the suits and jumping abilities so I don't really use it often but that's just my style. I am in the camp that would like to see some return to reality with this title. Be it with a WW2 era or normal modern era. I think the future thing has definitely run its course, especially in the map design. Boxy, square shapes and futurist buildings that have no real vibe to them. I much prefer a war torn village or a mansion full of toys to shoot. I would like this game to slow down a lot too. It's gotten a bit out of hand, like you just float as you walk instead of feeling like you actually take steps. For me it is a solid 7. Definitely worth the buy with all of the content and I am enjoying the MP with some of the maps being very strong.    … Expand
  75. Brazuka
    Nov 6, 2015
    7
    Very good game. I could give it a 8,5, but the multiplayer connection is terribly bad here in Brazil. All brazilian players are having lag every 3 seconds! It´s impossible to play! The same problem happened during the BETA tests and what did they (Activision / Treyarch) do to fix it? If they fix it soon I can give it a better grade!
  76. WildfireV3
    Nov 8, 2015
    7
    I won't go mental and give this game too low of a score, as it does at least deserve to be middle of the road due to the many changes that have come along with this iteration of CoD.

    That being said, there's a reason that there are so many negative reviews, and it's not because of "haters". A lot of these people are players that know great games. If I listed great games on PS4 right    I won't go mental and give this game too low of a score, as it does at least deserve to be middle of the road due to the many changes that have come along with this iteration of CoD.

    That being said, there's a reason that there are so many negative reviews, and it's not because of "haters". A lot of these people are players that know great games.

    If I listed great games on PS4 right now, It'd be GTA, Witcher 3, Bloodborne, TLOU, Dragonage & after that it becomes a bit more of a struggle. Call of Duty:Black Ops 3 no matter how much of a fan boy you are, does not deserve to be anywhere near that upper Echelon of games. I see IGN year after year giving CoD a 9/10 rating.. We all know they pay for those reviews and IGN are not to be trusted one bit.

    Call of Duty is the same thing it has always been, the same futuristic nonsense since the series went downhill & it's the same players buying it. One dimensional gamers that don't even know what games like Witcher 3 are!

    I say, let the poor players keep buying it, Call of Duty will remain the measuring stick by which bad gamers are judged by the gaming community, it is the breeding ground for people who are terrible at games in general and need an auto aim cartoon FPS to feel great.

    For anyone on the fence about this game, just ask yourself... Is it really worth spending $60, + the price of all the DLC packs for a game which is pretty much the same experience as every year, & next year will be worthless because everyone will be wasting their money on the next version.

    Or would you rather use that money and wait for one of the good games coming out later? Fallout 4? Horizon Zero Dawn? Last Guardian? No Mans Sky?

    Those of us that know great games are not singing Black Ops 3 praises right now, because it's mediocre and the fans of the series just can't see it, they've got their love glasses on.    … Expand
  77. Wareagle172324
    Nov 10, 2015
    7
    The game is ok....but it looks like this franchise wants to keep the fans that loved this franchise in the first place. This way to futuristic fighting is not what the fans of this series really liked. They need to go back to it's roots Black Ops 1 and 2 where awesome!!! Modern Warfare 2 and 3 were great. Ghost wasn't the best because fans compared it to the other awesome games that cameThe game is ok....but it looks like this franchise wants to keep the fans that loved this franchise in the first place. This way to futuristic fighting is not what the fans of this series really liked. They need to go back to it's roots Black Ops 1 and 2 where awesome!!! Modern Warfare 2 and 3 were great. Ghost wasn't the best because fans compared it to the other awesome games that came before it.

    Advanced Warfare and BO3 has gotten away from what made this series so good. Take the jet packs, ray guns and wall running out of this franchise please!!!! If they want to continue doing this kind of stuff they should just put out a new series so people can enjoy that title. This is not COD. I think they used the title of the franchise to get people to play a new game or something.    … Expand
  78. Wareforce
    Nov 11, 2015
    7
    With each new installment I always anticipate the same gaming experience I had with MW1/2 - Alas, that's not the case with BOPS3, but I also think it is to be expected as the franchise has moved away from what it used to be. We can all hope for a MW HD remaster, but lets me honest, it wont happen. Having yet to play any of the campaign I cant go into detail about it. Like the vastWith each new installment I always anticipate the same gaming experience I had with MW1/2 - Alas, that's not the case with BOPS3, but I also think it is to be expected as the franchise has moved away from what it used to be. We can all hope for a MW HD remaster, but lets me honest, it wont happen. Having yet to play any of the campaign I cant go into detail about it. Like the vast majority, I jumped straight into multiplayer and so far I'm having a blast, I feel a feint amount of addiction I once felt when playing MW, sure I don't top every game, we all have good games and bad games, but I've felt like the multiplayer side has been a step in the right direction. I picked it up for £42 and so far, I don't feel like the money has been wasted… Expand
  79. squodge
    Aug 10, 2016
    7
    CAMPAIGN 3/10
    This game's story is possibly the worst of all the CODs I've played, which is a shame because I've enjoyed the campaigns in every COD since World at War. Nevertheless, it's still playable - but the convoluted narrative just gives you a headache.
    ZOMBIES 2/10 I absolutely loved the four zombie maps in World at War, and most of the maps in Black Ops I were great too. I    CAMPAIGN 3/10
    This game's story is possibly the worst of all the CODs I've played, which is a shame because I've enjoyed the campaigns in every COD since World at War. Nevertheless, it's still playable - but the convoluted narrative just gives you a headache.

    ZOMBIES 2/10
    I absolutely loved the four zombie maps in World at War, and most of the maps in Black Ops I were great too. I hated zombies in Black Ops II, mainly because the maps were just too big - and they killed the ethos of nazi zombies by having all those pointless easter eggs. Exo-Zombies in Advanced Warfare is far more enjoyable than in BO2 or BO3.

    Black Ops III has the worst zombie maps of all - just way too big. The only consolation is the map The Giant, which is a re-imagined version of Der Riese. What also kills the game are those gobblegums that are absolutely needed to get anywhere in a game - and you need to play an awful lot of games to 'buy' these gobblegums from the vendor. P2W? No thank you.

    MULTIPLAYER 8/10
    I only started playing online with Ghosts because of my girlfriend - she loves MP in COD, and I thought I'd give it a try when I met her. Ghosts had maps that would have been great for Battlefield, i.e. they were too big for COD. Advanced Warfare had some decent maps, but the online just felt a bit sluggish at times.

    This is where BO3 excels - the multiplayer. Sure, some people hate the wall-running and boost jumping, but you just have to accept a game for what it is. I got into BO3 MP within a couple of hours of playing it. They kept the Pick-10 system, which works beautifully. You still get the usual no-scopers and quick-scopers, but nowhere as painful to play as any of the Modern Warfare series. If Treyarch were to remove quick-scoping and no-scoping (basically remove aim assist for all sniper rifles, heck I'd even accept if they removed aim assist for ALL weapons), then I'd bump the score up to a 9.

    OVERALL 7/10
    That's right, my rating isn't an average of the above three scores. Why not? I believe in trying to enjoy a game as much as possible. WAW, BO1 and AW had replay value because of zombies; MW, MW2, MW3 had reasonable MP but quick-sniping killed it really; Extinction mode in Ghosts was brilliant; and BO2 had little replay value because the MP wasn't great, zombies had awfully huge maps.

    I believe BO3 deserves a 7 because it has replay value if you can look past the wall-running/boost jumping in the multiplayer. There is a huge amount of customisation for your loadouts, not to mention you can create your own emblems, weapon skins, etc.    … Expand
  80. Lfb1206
    Nov 15, 2015
    7
    This is almost a full review. Multiplayer I found it pretty like the same and didn't like it because of the jumping special for the people that abuse of this (jumping all the time). The campaign was innovative because of the coop mode, isn't like the sophisticated campaigns of others game that are mostly campaign. Is simple and playable in local whit 1 more person and online with 3 more,This is almost a full review. Multiplayer I found it pretty like the same and didn't like it because of the jumping special for the people that abuse of this (jumping all the time). The campaign was innovative because of the coop mode, isn't like the sophisticated campaigns of others game that are mostly campaign. Is simple and playable in local whit 1 more person and online with 3 more, funny to play with friends. I always had like the zombies and still it is a good mode, I hate AW zombies because it changed it a lot, but this zombies has new and old maps whit different histories and new perks and Easter eggs.
    If you like playing with friends you can do it with the campaign, zombies and the nightmare mode you will do it great but the multiplayer is lagging all the time, it is almost the same as in AW and is the first shot kill style.
    Thank you, this is my opinion.
    Hopefully this will be helpful for your choice.    … Expand
  81. Jbussy
    Feb 14, 2016
    7
    Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 feels different but familiar at the same time. The campaign starts out strong showcasing all that is has to offer and looking totally awesome, but the new things you see are cool but I found my self-sticking to my primary weapon throughout the missions. The other cool thing that they added was the progression system from multiplayer, it kept me more interested andCall of Duty: Black Ops 3 feels different but familiar at the same time. The campaign starts out strong showcasing all that is has to offer and looking totally awesome, but the new things you see are cool but I found my self-sticking to my primary weapon throughout the missions. The other cool thing that they added was the progression system from multiplayer, it kept me more interested and invested in the campaign. The story itself is good but I lost interest from the confusing storyline and in the end, things got weird and at that point, i had invested too much time to quit then. The zombies campaign sounds like a cool idea but just feels like it was thrown together at the last minute. Multiplayer adds new dimensions to the game by adding water and the ability to run on walls and when these features are used properly can lead to high killstreaks. Every other aspect feels the same and almost worn out. Zombies feels different and in my opinion almost too different. Overall the new features to the game are fun but all too familiar
    7/10
    JB    … Expand
  82. Infamous-Rivera
    Nov 19, 2015
    7
    I gave this game a rating of 7 for a few reasons. First im going to to state all the Negative and follow up with the Positive.

    Gameplay - From what i can tell about Blops 3s movement is its pretty much just a filtered version of destiny, titanfall, and advanced warfare. Though it does feel more ground based than the previous titles. Which is a good thing. Now as far as the guns go..Well    I gave this game a rating of 7 for a few reasons. First im going to to state all the Negative and follow up with the Positive.

    Gameplay - From what i can tell about Blops 3s movement is its pretty much just a filtered version of destiny, titanfall, and advanced warfare. Though it does feel more ground based than the previous titles. Which is a good thing. Now as far as the guns go..Well this is where i see how it feels so consistent or similar to blops 2 which is also good and bad but not too refreshing. the pick 10 works but also falls short when you realize the new additions for example how many attachments you can put on your primary weapon now leading to usually no side arm if you need one, or no wildcards cause you wanted a beefier primary weapon.
    Those are my personal problems on Gameplay on multiplayer now to the actual features.

    Campaign - I cant give a full review on this because i haven't played it but the fact that Treyarch incorporated co-op was a bold move especially the ability to level up your abilities. Very smart!

    MULTIPLAYER - The specialist addition is nice i suppose but feels a little biased towards certain specialist and the fact that your specialist weapon cant be temporarily halted or swapped out is a bummer. not to mention the fact that if you activate the weapon or ability and happen to die the second you do, results in an instant loss of it.

    The Maps - to be quite honest the majority of the maps dont really feel well thought through or exciting like Black ops 2 did maybe its just me but i hardly favor any of these maps.

    Customization - This is the area where Blops 3 really gets it right. The ability to make your own paint job as well as add a camo to your weapon. Gunsmith is also a nice addition but is limited to the weapons and attachments you've unlocked. You can also Customize your specialist if you favor a certain one more you unlock more helments or heads and also what they wear even to the point of taunts and victory quotes. Felt like the clothes and helments could have had more of a variety but nonetheless its good.

    ZOMBIES - Now i dont know if its just me but Shadows of Evil feels like a really difficult map there's so much to do and unlock in so little time because the zombies become potentially difficult very quick.
    unlike Blops 2 zombies i found myself dying at really early rounds. I really like the Atmosphere of the stage just wish i could explore it more without being mauled down by Zombies so quick.
    Most of my friends and myself prefer (blops one and two) zombies so far...

    I haven't had the chance to play (The Giant) map because i havent bought the Season Pass
    But i am sure it has to be better difficulty-wise than Shadows of Evil.

    SOUND - The gun shot sounds don't sound as nice as previous call of duty titles for some apparent reason, but explosions are nice and how specialist refer to each other by their names. Zombie screeches are kinda the same old but the new voice actors for the characters are pretty well done.
    Thats pretty much all i can say on that.

    Overall its a good take on the Call of Duty series and a really good fps shooter with capturing unlockables and progression. Lets hope to better future maps for zombies and multiplayer as well.    … Expand
  83. oCannibal
    Nov 19, 2015
    7
    In short, the campaign lacked. Multiplayer adds the Specialist class which gives it a good flavor. None is really overpowered and majority are found useful as you will see in lobbys that most people have a different Specialist. New Arena mode (4v4 competitive playlist) is sweet but does come with flaws. Ban/Protect makes it interesting as you 8 players can choose to Ban or Protect a gun,In short, the campaign lacked. Multiplayer adds the Specialist class which gives it a good flavor. None is really overpowered and majority are found useful as you will see in lobbys that most people have a different Specialist. New Arena mode (4v4 competitive playlist) is sweet but does come with flaws. Ban/Protect makes it interesting as you 8 players can choose to Ban or Protect a gun, perk, specialist, or killstreak. Problem is the process takes too long as you have to wait till everyone chooses, than draft a specialist, create a class, and edit killstreaks. It takes about 3-5 minutes to start a game after you got in it. And if a teammate leaves, there is no replacing the player. Zombies is awesome as well… Expand
  84. Booker9380
    Nov 22, 2015
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The last call of duty game has a astonishing and amusing multiplayer.. But on the other hand the campaign isn't that good I was expecting.. Plus : black ops 3 is focusing on high tech weapons .. That what's making it too far of black ops one and it's great story..… Expand
  85. filip92
    Jul 9, 2022
    7
    I had a really fun time with the campaign that is very underrated in my opinion. They tried to make a good story and they did it.
  86. god_of_chuck
    Nov 23, 2015
    7
    78/100

    This is the first COD in a while with a solid, enjoyable multiplayer experience. Lag is minimal, the community isn't toxic garbage, and the maps have a good feel to them and make good use of the mechanics. Graphics are smooth and meet expectations on current gen. The black market system is soso. Honestly could have been left out. Same with the character specific power-ups. The    78/100

    This is the first COD in a while with a solid, enjoyable multiplayer experience. Lag is minimal, the community isn't toxic garbage, and the maps have a good feel to them and make good use of the mechanics. Graphics are smooth and meet expectations on current gen. The black market system is soso. Honestly could have been left out. Same with the character specific power-ups. The campaign is ok but lacks big, wow, set pieces that the series is known for. Zombies is still fun but is a little odd. Overall an improvement over the last few games, but the series still doesn't really have its groove back    … Expand
  87. Harry28
    Jan 6, 2016
    7
    Black Ops 3 is a great game, but it's not amazing, it is plagued by the same problems that every Call of Duty has. Bad spawns, terrible matchmaking and horrendous team balance. But that's just multiplayer. The campaign is forgettable, like almost every COD, but Black Ops 3 zombies is a bit different from the other COD zombies, so if your playing it just for zombies I'm pretty sure you'llBlack Ops 3 is a great game, but it's not amazing, it is plagued by the same problems that every Call of Duty has. Bad spawns, terrible matchmaking and horrendous team balance. But that's just multiplayer. The campaign is forgettable, like almost every COD, but Black Ops 3 zombies is a bit different from the other COD zombies, so if your playing it just for zombies I'm pretty sure you'll love it. The game could be 9/10 if they fixed multiplayer and put more effort into the campaign.… Expand
  88. peepequod
    Dec 29, 2015
    7
    Call of duty bo3 doesn't really deserve all this 0 hate, but its definitely nothing too special. If you haven't played to much of the previous cods this one still holds the previous mechanics and speed of gameplay that the cods are known for while also including a mixed version of aw's whole flight thing, with a campaign that is decent and fun enough to hold your attention. Yes its true itCall of duty bo3 doesn't really deserve all this 0 hate, but its definitely nothing too special. If you haven't played to much of the previous cods this one still holds the previous mechanics and speed of gameplay that the cods are known for while also including a mixed version of aw's whole flight thing, with a campaign that is decent and fun enough to hold your attention. Yes its true it doesn't deviate to far from its past but its still a very fun turn off your brain, lets shoot stuff kinda game and if you where expecting something insanely different... well at this point you probably shouldn't have. In an age where sequels are extremely pressed to find something new while keeping things the same cod manages to stay fun. Plus, its surprising that this yearly franchise can hold so much more content with a decent campaign, interesting/fun zombies, and another extra zombie "story mode". So if you want a pretty decent and fun game pick it up, it'll hold your attention enough for your moneys worth, especially if you have friend to play it with.… Expand
  89. axino
    Jan 27, 2016
    7
    Ok this is a review of the multiplayer only since i haven't touched campaign or zombies yet and after playing bo2 its kinda obvious how those two modes are going to be like.
    On to the multiplayer ok first things first match making is not great, takes some time to find matches and people only play dom and tdm. I have had lag issues and its not just my internet its the hosts connection.    Ok this is a review of the multiplayer only since i haven't touched campaign or zombies yet and after playing bo2 its kinda obvious how those two modes are going to be like.
    On to the multiplayer ok first things first match making is not great, takes some time to find matches and people only play dom and tdm. I have had lag issues and its not just my internet its the hosts connection. (activision, billion dollar company and no dedicated servers...). Maps are ehh but obviously since there brining back old maps into map packs they gotta make more money. Maps could have better layout but some are ok. Graphics are fine for console no problems here. Guns.... as usual smgs are op, and everything else takes some "skill" to use but smgs are spray and pray (vesper). The specialist are cool but some are obviously better than others but are are playable if you get used to their abilities. Last but not least is the extra content aka customization. You can customize alot of your online charecter and thats really cool, (gun paint, specialist skin, emblem, etc) some stuff you get from micro-trans but its optional of course. This was my first cod since bo2 and it brings back some memories, i still wish it played like old cod and didn't have thrusting and wall running tho. In the end the multiplayer does not deserve a 10 5 or 0. id give at the worst a 6.7 and at best a 7.9.    … Expand
  90. Slingy
    Feb 17, 2016
    7
    This game i believe to attempt to come back to call of duty's roots but its no Modern Warfare 1 or 2 but it does introduce a couple of improved mechanics from the old call of duty games and is leaps better than the previous two installments and i believe they are heading in the right direction, although what I just discussed is true it does have its flaws as this game does a bit better jobThis game i believe to attempt to come back to call of duty's roots but its no Modern Warfare 1 or 2 but it does introduce a couple of improved mechanics from the old call of duty games and is leaps better than the previous two installments and i believe they are heading in the right direction, although what I just discussed is true it does have its flaws as this game does a bit better job at bringing the community back together it still in some ways drives them further apart with the movement system which is something i enjoyed and much better than advanced warfare's bunny hoping simulator it leads me to give this game a 7/10, as its not bad and improves on the last two games of the series which made the franchise lose a lot of its customers… Expand
  91. Blaxpupas
    Mar 16, 2016
    7
    This game is the biggest and best CoD since CoD 4:MW
    Haters say its a peace of **** but i think its a game that changed a bit the saga, but i see its old gen and unbalanced matchmaking.
  92. mynxmeis
    Apr 22, 2016
    7
    Call Of Duty Black Ops 3 -

    I am not impressed with how C.o.D has made Black Ops 3, It has failed to bring what the community has asked for (World at War 2?) The realism in the game is not impressive and the game is too colorful and bright , not army-like at all. Apart from that the games runs smoothly, along with keeping the game fast-paced with a new zombies experience. I have a    Call Of Duty Black Ops 3 -

    I am not impressed with how C.o.D has made Black Ops 3, It has failed to bring what the community has asked for (World at War 2?) The realism in the game is not impressive and the game is too colorful and bright , not army-like at all.

    Apart from that the games runs smoothly, along with keeping the game fast-paced with a new zombies experience. I have a PlayStation 4 with BO3 with the season pass so I can maintain all the new DLC.

    I am happy with the game, but i prefer the classic C.o.D games instead.    … Expand
  93. KayVen17
    Dec 29, 2016
    7
    Deutsche Review - Kritik

    Der folgende Test ist in 5 Kategorien zusammengefasst. Diese 5 Kartegorien ergeben die Gesamtpunktzahl von 0 - 100 Punkten. Um einen passenden Userscore zu geben wird auf oder abgerundet. Bei 84 Punkten ergibt das einen User Score von 8. Bei 86 einen von Userscore von 9. Falls eine 85 kommt entscheide ich ob ich es eher positiv oder negativ nehme. Regeln    Deutsche Review - Kritik

    Der folgende Test ist in 5 Kategorien zusammengefasst. Diese 5 Kartegorien ergeben die Gesamtpunktzahl von 0 - 100 Punkten. Um einen passenden Userscore zu geben wird auf oder abgerundet. Bei 84 Punkten ergibt das einen User Score von 8. Bei 86 einen von Userscore von 9. Falls eine 85 kommt entscheide ich ob ich es eher positiv oder negativ nehme. Regeln verstanden?
    Dann sind hier meine Punkte.

    Mein persönlicher Score = 67/10
    Mein User Score = 7/10    … Expand
  94. Brochacho214
    May 25, 2016
    7
    As an avid Call Of Duty fan, I can say that this franchise is starting to sink exponentially. The last two installments were very big letdowns, and while this title is a definite improvement, it still falls short in certain categories.

    At its core, Call Of Duty has always been a casual shooter, as in something you can put in and immediately and know how to play. It's has an    As an avid Call Of Duty fan, I can say that this franchise is starting to sink exponentially. The last two installments were very big letdowns, and while this title is a definite improvement, it still falls short in certain categories.

    At its core, Call Of Duty has always been a casual shooter, as in something you can put in and immediately and know how to play. It's has an exponentially low skill ceiling (depending on your playstyle) and was always just a game you and your friends can have a good time in.

    The single player is pretty unique. Treyarch took a sort of tactical approach to the single player, adding in special abilities and new features. The added different kinds of enemies into the mix, such as robots and tank-like enemies called warlords, of which contributes to the level of tactic and thought you must put in before tackling a level or location. The levels are very action packed, as expected with every CoD.

    The multi-player in this game is a big improvement from Advanced Warfare, but still has a few kinks. They took out the dreaded "exo-abilities" from the mix and instead replaced it with a thrust pack that can improve movement, but doesn't let players fly around the entirety of the map. Combat is usually found on the ground, and can be really intense and engaging especially with the wallrun ability. Weapon balance has improved greatly and lets players pick from a plethora of weapons that are viable in mutli-player. Another addition is the Specialist option, which allows players to pick a character that has a set ability in the game.
    These abilities are viable and can be really useful, but can sometimes be fairly unbalanced.

    Zombies in this game is very well done. The only new addition to zombies is the GobbleGum perks, which are set abilities you can bring in and buy using points in the game. These are completely optional, however, and you don't really need to rely on them to go into high rounds.

    All around, the game isn't bad. I give this a 7 because it's very easy to lose interest in. Around the time i got to 4th prestige, i pretty much stopped playing as much as I used too. The matches themselves can get really repetitive and boring, and zombies just seems to drag on after about round 25.

    All in all, if you like CoD, I'd say buy. If your not a fan of CoD, see for yourself if you like it or not.    … Expand
  95. Ronan
    Jul 24, 2016
    7
    it's a descent game lets start off first with the story first it has loads more content than previous cod games though it lacks variety the is basically what you do go to a cool place shoot some people and go on then zombies its okey though it only has one map then the multiplayer its usual cod nothing more and for first timers well it's a fast paced fps shooter with a couple of game modesit's a descent game lets start off first with the story first it has loads more content than previous cod games though it lacks variety the is basically what you do go to a cool place shoot some people and go on then zombies its okey though it only has one map then the multiplayer its usual cod nothing more and for first timers well it's a fast paced fps shooter with a couple of game modes I think cod could great if it was a bit more original what I mean is cod black opps 3 is basically a Reskin of advanced warfare I also find it quite hard to recommend for 60 euro about 30 40 it's quite recommended I would give it a 7.7/10 thank you for reading… Expand
  96. superxcereal
    Jun 29, 2016
    7
    Ive been a big COD fan for a while BO3 was like they tried a liiiiittttle too hard. it is fun especially with the specialist and customization's you can make. zombies is new and revamped looking great. campaign is okayish but fun. my only fault is that its so laggy and connection gets lost and hackers all while trying to squeeze money out of you to make your character look different... isIve been a big COD fan for a while BO3 was like they tried a liiiiittttle too hard. it is fun especially with the specialist and customization's you can make. zombies is new and revamped looking great. campaign is okayish but fun. my only fault is that its so laggy and connection gets lost and hackers all while trying to squeeze money out of you to make your character look different... is it really worth money to change clothes and skins of guns? stop being greedy if you cant even deliver lag free so i dont have to rage about no xp to get these stupid skins, maybe more people would pay if they had great online experiences.… Expand
  97. dislexicpotato
    Oct 21, 2018
    7
    Black Ops 3 has a ton of new ideas and is better than its predecessor AW with its pretty graphics, smooth fun gameplay and a range of maps that are for the most part good. However its campaign is weak, league play is disappointing and the game overall just feels like a downgrade of Black Ops 2 and feels like a downgraded Titanfall.
  98. Ishi123
    Mar 20, 2017
    7
    So this is the first COD game I've played since Black Ops 2. I didn't really think much of COD in general, since they are now the most generic of generic FPS games, but my friend brought this one over to play on my PS4 so here we are.

    DISCLAIMER: Multiplayer is not a factor in this review due to my long standing bias against competitive multiplayer. That's right. I'm one of the three    So this is the first COD game I've played since Black Ops 2. I didn't really think much of COD in general, since they are now the most generic of generic FPS games, but my friend brought this one over to play on my PS4 so here we are.

    DISCLAIMER: Multiplayer is not a factor in this review due to my long standing bias against competitive multiplayer. That's right. I'm one of the three people who plays COD exclusively for the single player!

    So first thing I noticed about the new gen COD is that the shooting controls are so much tighter and they feel so much better. It's not even the controller, either. I play the first Black Ops with a PS4 controller because the PS3 controller is garbage for shooters and Black Ops 3 just plain feels better. I'm not a super expert on shooters or anything, but the controls just feel better and easier to handle. I've never been good with snipers in COD, but in Black Ops 3 for some reason I'm just able to swing the scope in and hit dead on center-mass quickly and easily.

    Which is a good segue to the guns. The guns are all future tech stuff with sharp edges and all that stuff that looks space-age and everything. Though I laughed when I saw the future AK pattern rifle because I imagine that something like that will actually exist within the next 20 years since that thing is never going away. The guns look pretty nice, but more importantly, they FEEL nice. Shooting the guns just feels so much better than anything in the previous games. The sounds they make, the animations when firing, even the reload animations look really cool. I actually like all the guns in this game, and each feels VERY different from the others, instead of every single one of them just being a point at bad guy and shoot affair with no real defining characteristics, save for mode of fire.

    The new cybernetic stuff is pretty neat, even if it is just blatantly ripping off Titanfall, though Advanced Warfare did it first. I like all the cyber core abilities, letting me manipulate the battlefield and accommodating different playstyles. I could be a manipulator, hacking enemy bots and making them fight for me, or shorting out people's cybernetics and turning their own bodies against them. I could be stealthy, going invisible with a silenced weapon or slamming a shockwave down on a group of enemies. Or I could just blow everything up, making 5 guys puke their guts out at once and setting people on fire. It's fun to have different options in your arsenal instead of just shoot the bad guys in the face.

    On to the story. The story on a first run through is schizophrenic as hell and I got lost halfway through. I chalked it up to COD trying to out-COD itself as it tries to do with every iteration, but by the end I was going "this is the most retarded thing I've ever seen, what is even going on?". Then after the story was over I Googled "what the f*** happened in Black Ops 3's story" and read up on what actually went on. After I read up on that and understood the actual story, I realized just how brilliant the story was. This is the least COD COD I have ever played. Treyarch made a fantastic story that is so complex I couldn't explain it if I used all 5000 characters I'm allowed, and it's all really compelling. There's one problem I have with it, though. This game's own license hurt the game more than anything. If I wasn't expecting just more COD boom, bang, kill everything with stupid setpieces, I may have picked up on the subtle hints the game was giving throughout. And oh, boy, are those hints subtle. Only with new knowledge of the story was I able to catch those moments that are weaved all throughout the story. I would go "OHHHHH, THAT'S WHAT THAT'S ABOUT!" to a weird moment that made absolutely no sense before. But the COD name hurts the story. If this had an entirely different license to it, like a new IP, and it made it's story on that, uncoupled from the gigantic Michael Bay spectacle the COD series basically is now, and if they tweaked the narrative a bit so it seemed more like "oh, there's something deeper going on here" and less like "this is a complete clustermolest, I'm so lost", then this story could've been so amazing. I really like the story in this game, it's a brilliant narrative that blew my mind when I figured it out. But like I said, the COD name added with the fact that it's basically impossible to not get lost bring it down.

    I do like this game, though. It's not a bad game. Certainly not the ones and zeroes everyone and their dog seems to be giving it. It doesn't stop the series from stagnating and doesn't put the brakes on its slow descent into obsolescence, but for what it is, it's not bad. I just wish it wasn't a COD game. That being said, Treyarch is now on my list of developers to watch, because this story was absolutely brilliant, even if it's flawed.    … Expand
  99. Progamer420
    Nov 13, 2016
    7
    BO3 is a good multiplayer game but it does not make the best FPS out there.
    The campaign is good and 4 player co-op is a new feature which feels great. The story is very complicated and way too futuristic. But the campaign is fun to play.
    The multiplayer part is one of treyarch's best till date. But same physics as AW. And also has numerous glitches and bugs. Zombies mode... Pretty same    BO3 is a good multiplayer game but it does not make the best FPS out there.
    The campaign is good and 4 player co-op is a new feature which feels great. The story is very complicated and way too futuristic. But the campaign is fun to play.
    The multiplayer part is one of treyarch's best till date. But same physics as AW. And also has numerous glitches and bugs.
    Zombies mode... Pretty same as others but has a significant story and good but not the best gameplay.    … Expand
  100. destinyfan1
    Nov 13, 2016
    7
    first campain well...
    i didn't play it totaly becouse it went boring and i hate boring campains
    second the zombie part in this game is probaly the best . in the beginning not that fun but then BAM the fun comes truely a lot of action then the multiplayer . Its fun and when i want to do a random multiplayer this is one of my best choises but after a while this begins to get truely    first campain well...
    i didn't play it totaly becouse it went boring and i hate boring campains
    second the zombie part in this game is probaly the best . in the beginning not that fun but then BAM the fun comes truely a lot of action
    then the multiplayer . Its fun and when i want to do a random multiplayer this is one of my best choises but after a while this begins to get truely frustrating becouse of campers I now a radar will make it lesser exciting but it is just for the campers    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

51
#51 Best PS4 Game of 2015
8
#8 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 87 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 73 out of 87
  2. Mixed: 14 out of 87
  3. Negative: 0 out of 87
  1. GameGrin
    Feb 4, 2016
    75
    Underneath the glamour, it feels like just another Call of Duty game - to the delight of existing fans, but the chagrin of players seeking new turf.
    Read full review
  2. CD-Action
    Jan 12, 2016
    75
    Both the single player and online modes are fun but don’t expect to be blown away. Despite a great story and a couple of very enjoyable missions the campaign as a whole is a tad boring. [13/2015, p.50]
  3. Pelit (Finland)
    Jan 4, 2016
    91
    What we have here is the best Call of Duty single player experience to date. The multiplayer is solid too, though the much-talked re-design has resulted a multiplayer experience that really doesn’t differ all that much from the previous ones. [Nov 2015]
See all critic reviews »