Metascore
67

Mixed or average reviews - based on 26 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 26
  2. Negative: 0 out of 26
  1. Aug 18, 2016
    85
    I really liked Brut@l. It has vivid graphics, good depth, a strong solo mode with its presentation of dungeons and the enemies, and this was topped off with a really intuitive Dungeon Creator. There is plenty on offer here, and it certainly doesn’t restrict itself to fans of the genre.
  2. 80
    In a sea of roguelikes, you might as well go to the source. Brut@l is a brilliantly addictive reimagining of the original Rogue with smart graphics and accessible combat.
  3. 80
    It’s a hugely entertaining, visually striking experience, and has instantly become my favourite multiplayer title on the PlayStation 4.
  4. Aug 8, 2016
    80
    Brut@l is one of this summer's most pleasant surprises. By taking inspiration from classics like Rogue and adding new gameplay mechanics, striking visuals and some very fluent gameplay, Brut@l becomes a great game in its own right.
  5. Aug 8, 2016
    80
    An experience housing enough content to validate repeated play-throughs, Brut@l — despite its stripped approach to crafting and indeed to leveling-up — manages enough in its generative structure to add a distinct level of spice to make even the most minimal-looking of scenarios feel both exciting and enticing.
  6. Sep 6, 2016
    75
    There are only so many bad guys you can explode to bright red bits before they — pardon the pun — start to bleed into each other. If that's your thing, then for sure you'll want to check this game out, but if it's not, you'll want to proceed with a bit of caution.
  7. 75
    Arguably, Brut@l lacks the depth of some of its genre contemporaries while the uniquely touted ASCII-inspired veneer, though a flamboyant shift from the norm, results in some visually repetitive environments. All the same, Brut@l still acquits itself nicely as a decent hack and slash yarn whose prospects are elevated by co-operative play and a neat level editor that adds a good number of extra hours to its playtime.
  8. 75
    The dynamically generated world and character leveling systems help to emphasize its infinite replayability.
  9. Aug 2, 2016
    75
    A neat dungeon crawler offering some fluid combat, with tough challenges wrapped up in an art style straight out of Tron.
User Score
6.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 14 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 14
  2. Negative: 4 out of 14
  1. Aug 10, 2016
    8
    Brut@l is a procedurally generated, realtime, isometric dungeon crawler with an artistic style that makes liberal use of the ASCII characterBrut@l is a procedurally generated, realtime, isometric dungeon crawler with an artistic style that makes liberal use of the ASCII character set in its graphical models. It is styled after old school turn-based ASCII roguelikes like Rogue and Nethack, though its realtime nature makes the play very different from the aforementioned roguelikes.

    Pros:
    * The controls are simple, straightforward, and relatively precise.
    * The combat is surprisingly satisfying, given its simplistic nature.
    * The game didn't crash once.
    * The worst bug I noticed was a trophy not unlocking; specifically, when I realized I was going to win, I made sure to drink one type of each potion in order to unlock the trophy linked to doing just that. The trophy didn't unlock.
    * The combinations of creatures you find in different rooms can make for challenging combat.
    * Most of the dungeon is black and white. Surprisingly, this is quite advantageous, as the things that are colored (lava, water, poison, etc.) *really* stand out.
    * Unlike most trailers, watching the Brut@l gameplay trailers will give you a *really* good idea of how the game works, and what to expect from the game. The trailers don't oversell Brut@l at all.
    * The ending I saw is simple, but a little surprising and fun. I don't know if there's more than one ending.
    * The procedural generation was quite good. There's certainly some re-use of rooms and such (maze rooms, rooms with platforms surrounded by water or lava, etc.), but it never felt old.

    Cons:
    * The AI is simple-minded. Creatures will proceed toward you using the shortest possible path. If there is no path to you (say, because there's a chasm between you and the creature), then the creature will stand as close to you as possible while you shoot it with arrows or zap it with wands. Not as bad as Necropolis, to be sure, but still pretty bad. Hopefully, they'll address the AI in an update.
    * This game likely wasn't tested well by patient gamers. If you're patient and careful (say, if you've played enough Souls games), you might beat the game on your first try (I did).
    * I had a difficult time getting used to aiming arrows. The other missile-type weapons/devices were easier to aim for some reason. I think it's because once you ready the arrow, the direction of your aim is fixed, regardless of whether or not you move around before loosing the arrow.
    * The skill paths make no sense. There are some skills that have prerequisites that make absolutely no sense.
    * Towards the end game, your character class won't matter because all character classes have the same skill paths. The character class only determines what skills you start with.
    * No NG+, or difficulty settings.

    My playthrough was approximately 10-11 hours of game time. I've read other reviews that suggest a playthrough can be finished in 3-4 hours. After my playthrough, I can say that I feel quite satisfied. I can see myself trying a second playthrough in a week or so.

    I haven't tried the local co-op, but intend to soon.
    Full Review »
  2. Oct 4, 2016
    6
    I had a lot of fun playing this game in the first couple of weeks I owned it, but it didn't hold up well. I eventually got bored playing it.I had a lot of fun playing this game in the first couple of weeks I owned it, but it didn't hold up well. I eventually got bored playing it.

    It's a fairly simple game, very easy to pick up and go with.

    I really like the design of the game and their use of color along with the ASCII characters. Almost everything is black and white, (caves have a green tint to them), so items of color really stand out and grab your attention. Water is blue, fire is orange and so forth.

    I wish the camera could be moved a bit better, maybe 360, or further in any given direction.

    That being said, I love how responsive all the controls work. I am real stickler for controls that work well and these controls do not disappoint!

    I co-op'ed local last night and it was very challenging to say the least. For local co-op, I would have to give the game a rating of maybe a 4 or 5 right now. Both players have to share the same screen and it can become really problematic because if one character is further away then you can't move your own character out of a poisonous gas cloud, or jump away from an enemy, let's say. There just isn't enough room and sometimes the game moves too fast which makes local co- op problematic. I think the local co-op would work MUCH better if each player were given a split screen and weren't tethered to one another.
    Full Review »
  3. Aug 25, 2016
    7
    This game is a great rougelike but unfortunately I find the chosen art style hard to look at for extended periods. I get the idea of why itThis game is a great rougelike but unfortunately I find the chosen art style hard to look at for extended periods. I get the idea of why it looks the way it does but I still find it hard to want to look at it. Also the platforming sucks. I do not want to time jumps in a rogelike. Wanted to like this more. Full Review »