User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 17 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 17
  2. Negative: 5 out of 17
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. May 19, 2015
    5
    One of the first reasons that made me buy this game is that I always search for rare games to begin with, games that unless I buy over the official online shops I would NEVER be able to buy them, games like Ar no Surge of any of the Atelier series. So when I saw this I made a quick search: it's essentially an tactical rpg that it's depicted as a board game for the fights, and overall I wasOne of the first reasons that made me buy this game is that I always search for rare games to begin with, games that unless I buy over the official online shops I would NEVER be able to buy them, games like Ar no Surge of any of the Atelier series. So when I saw this I made a quick search: it's essentially an tactical rpg that it's depicted as a board game for the fights, and overall I was curious about it.

    For starters, I will say the good things: the game is about ghost hunting and that's already a good hook for me: I'm a big fan of ghost-related games such as Project Zero and this alone made me curious. And it's also an RPG, another Genre I love so what could go wrong?!

    Well...a lot of things.

    Let me explain my reactions to this game: when I started I saw the characters well drawn and well animated ....attached to an obvious photo with some effects to make it look like a drawing that should be somewhat "unique". Frankly, I don't like this style: it smells of cheap and without effort and I would've preferred something else.

    After the intro, I played a little bit more, we find a ghost and our first match begins...AND MY GOD the combat is some of the most convoluted and confusing things I've ever seen. As I said the game is a sort of tactical rpg, and I do mean "sort of" because it's totally different from the usual Disgaea and others. Reason? Whenever you do your movements, the enemies MOVES TOO! You know what that means?

    This is a game about prediction.

    I failed almost 4 times at the very first battle of this game: not because it was hard, not because I couldn't figure out where the ghost was, BUT BECAUSE THE MOTHERF-----ER WON'T STAND STILL! I wasted all 15 turns to "predict" his movement but I just kept getting bumped from the ghost and the two characters couldn't hit him!

    I was frustrated: I couldn't believe this is the combat system they chose for this game, because it's completely random. Yes the board tells you when a ghost will attack (he will do a "scream"), but he doesn't tell you WHO and WHERE! So after finishing my first battle I dreaded to do more battles: I was going to die and die and my hopes were becoming grim.

    But here I noticed something: when I finally had full control of the game, with 3 characters that had different ranges and my character having a weapon that didn't suck...I was actually getting good. Not simply good but VERY good: the main character was becoming so strong that he could 1 shot ghosts, my 3 characters were able to cover all of the ghost's possible pattern so he couldn't escape, and I was getting double the money rewarded for a quick completion. On top of that the missions give so much exp that I was overlevelled by the end of the first chapter!

    I was...actually getting good and from that point on, I basically never lost a fight and even boss fights can end quickly with my character able to do so much damage that would end battles in less than 5 turns.

    What's the deal of this wall of text? That the game is flawed, it's hard to learn and there's so much wrong in this game: aside the fights the character you control is essentially non existant, the interaction system is flatout weird and hard to understand, voice acting is so minimum that I felt more voice acting in late PS1 games, the graphics are minimal with only the HQ being drawn instead of a "photo and overall it's a mediocre game that should be bashed! But I still play it non-stop: I love the style (it reminds me of persona), I love the ghost-related plot, I like the characters enough and I like that the game rewards me so good for beating the ghosts quickly.

    This game is flawed and for that reason, I cannot recommend it highly: it's messy and feels cheap and if you want a true tactical jrpg you should play something else instead. But...if you're willing to look into it, make sure to have patience and to learn the combat properly, because after you do the game becomes a breeze and it becomes insanely easy to end battles in few turns.

    Mediocre, but incredibly satisfying.
    Expand
  2. Mar 12, 2015
    7
    Tokyo Twilight Ghost Hunter is a pretty game, a decent story, and has quite catchy tunes. But the battle mechanics are quite confusing, and makes you guess where the ghost will move in order to attack them. The idea is not bad, but can and will putt off non T-RPG Gamers
    It's an average game, that does not deserve 40$.
Metascore
64

Mixed or average reviews - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 11
  2. Negative: 0 out of 11
  1. CD-Action
    Jul 27, 2015
    60
    A beautiful, well animated visual novel that fails at everything that could really make it stand out from the crowd. [08/2015, p.75]
  2. May 11, 2015
    60
    Tokyo Twilight Ghost Hunters is an interesting experiment. The episodic structure is really nice, and the artworks are simply awesome. The lack of a good story, the abuse of anime stereotypes, and an odd combat system are the most important issues of this game. Still, this is a good way to start playing visual novels, for novices.
  3. Apr 22, 2015
    58
    Regardless of game mechanics and how many genres you could lump on top of it, Ghost Hunters is trying to deliver on story. But how well does it do that? With relative competence you could say. I would judge it solely on narrative if the situation allowed, but the developers have chosen to include something else - something that certainly makes sense in its context, but the strategy component is easily the weaker link. Sadly that’s not something I can ignore.