User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 75 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 43 out of 75
  2. Negative: 11 out of 75
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Oct 21, 2011
    7
    I don't know why this game is getting negative reviews. The game is decent, especially for Simpsons fans. The world has been captured like it never has been before and the voice acting is solid. Although repetitive gameplay and a not so lengthy game doesn't make this a must buy. But for Simpsons fans? Absolutely.
  2. Aug 30, 2011
    7
    This game has got alot of bad press in my opinion. It's not horrible by any means. It's got plenty of humor and charm and lots of game references that I could appreciate.

    Graphics = Good cel shading and cut scene swap outs. Very nice visual style. Sounds = All the characters and voices from the show, dialog only gets old if you get stuck on the same part. Controls = Pretty simple and
    This game has got alot of bad press in my opinion. It's not horrible by any means. It's got plenty of humor and charm and lots of game references that I could appreciate.

    Graphics = Good cel shading and cut scene swap outs. Very nice visual style.


    Sounds = All the characters and voices from the show, dialog only gets old if you get stuck on the same part.


    Controls = Pretty simple and easy to use, learning everybody's weapon is the trick.


    Difficulty = Really hard at times because you're not shown what to do sometimes and you can get stuck. Once you figure out your path than it's not so bad.


    Playability = Easy to learn, good for adult and kid fans alike.


    Value = I wouldn't say a $60 game but used for say $20 or $25 it's worth it. If you're a big Simpsons fan this is a must.



    Overall value = If you've played any Simpson's game and wished it was better, than this is your game. Hasn't been one this fun since the old arcade. They even reference how bad their old games were.
    Expand
  3. Feb 16, 2016
    7
    The game features allot of the same humour that made me love The Simpsons in the first place. It delivers a funny experience while making you a part of Springfield first-hand. It's not the best Simpsons game (Hit and Run) but the only one that really made me feel like I was directly in an episode.

    The gameplay is difficult as the mechanics are broken. It's easy to see where the
    The game features allot of the same humour that made me love The Simpsons in the first place. It delivers a funny experience while making you a part of Springfield first-hand. It's not the best Simpsons game (Hit and Run) but the only one that really made me feel like I was directly in an episode.

    The gameplay is difficult as the mechanics are broken. It's easy to see where the budget was spent. Had they worked on it it could've been a decent platformer as well. Instead we got this game which often gets frustrating due to the camera controls. It also feels like some of the drawing was rushed. The level design isn't even that well thought of either for the most part.

    That being said, if you're a Simpsons fan, seeing through these flaws will be fairly easy. If you don't like the Simpsons and are just looking for a platformer to play, move along.
    Expand
  4. Jul 6, 2012
    5
    Dull and fairly boring. The Simpsons game will grab your attention and loose it very quickly due to the poor story, bad enemy types and boring gameplay. Snore,
  5. Feb 19, 2020
    6
    The last time I paid a visit to “The Simpsons” in video game form, it was when I reviewed “The Simpsons: Hit & Run,” one of the most popular licensed video games of all-time, and also one of the most beloved. Despite all of the love the game received, though, I rated the game a 6/10 when I reviewed it on here back in 2017 (my profile says 2018, but that’s because thank you, grammarThe last time I paid a visit to “The Simpsons” in video game form, it was when I reviewed “The Simpsons: Hit & Run,” one of the most popular licensed video games of all-time, and also one of the most beloved. Despite all of the love the game received, though, I rated the game a 6/10 when I reviewed it on here back in 2017 (my profile says 2018, but that’s because thank you, grammar errors). I can’t tell you if I got backlash on that because…this is Metacritic, there’s no comment section on reviews, but I can only imagine how unpopular my opinion was given that the Internet collectively christened the game among the “as good as it gets” of licensed games. And I totally get that opinion, because it did interestingly take the formula of “Grand Theft Auto” and make it work with “The Simpsons,” but to me, when I remove my rose-colored nostalgia lenses, I find that the game has aged poorly in some regards. That, however, brought me to “The Simpsons Game,” which I’d argue sits second to “Hit & Run” in terms of popularity and general reception. I wanted to revisit the game to see if I could get more enjoyment out of it than “Hit & Run,” and…I suppose I did, but only slightly, and given that “Hit & Run” already wasn’t the highest bar to reach, I’d say “The Simpsons Game” merely hopped over the bar.
    Now, don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to like about “The Simpsons Game.” Aesthetically, this game totally fits the bill as a “Simpsons” game. The cel-shaded graphics capture the look and feel of the show to near-perfection, the music feels very reminiscent of the show, and the voice work is sharp as usual. I also think the writing in this game is pretty fantastic: beyond how faithful it feels to the show, I love how the game satirizes the show and the gaming industry, the latter of which is so intriguing because much of the commentary still feels relevant to gaming today, even though the game is set to turn thirteen years old this year. The level design is also pretty clever and inventive, and I also commend the game for having quite a bit of content and plenty of secrets in the game despite its short length, giving you a lot to do and experience, especially as the open-world of Springfield can be pretty fun to explore even once you’ve completed the adventure.
    With all of that said, this game is held back in one massive area, and probably the most important one: the gameplay. Very little about the gameplay here is truly special beyond some of the aforementioned level design, and even though it’s fun to see the game lampoon and satirize the industry in a way that still feels relevant, I’d argue the gameplay doesn’t go with it. In fact, the game kinda gets worse as you get further in. For starters, while I’ve heard a lot of people complain about the game’s length, I’d argue on the alternative that the game’s levels often feel too long, especially when you get late into the game and story missions start to revolve around repetitive collection, fetch quests, and more. Furthermore, the combat (if you really want to call it that) is extremely weak, which creates a lot of frustration later in the game when the missions become more combat-centric, and also the camera, more often than not, simply refuses to work. As much of the writing has aged well with this game, it’s sad that the gameplay hasn’t aged with it.
    Overall, “The Simpsons Game” is merely decent to me. It’s not all that special in regards to its gameplay, and the main thing that keeps it going is how well it respects the source material, while providing excellent doses of humor that, even nearly thirteen years later, feel timely and relevant. All in all, I think of this game as being the ultimate “for fans only” kind of title: if you’re a huge fan of “The Simpsons” and you enjoy a humorous, well-written game, lackluster gameplay be damned, I’d say you’ll probably get something out of this. If you’re not a huge fan, though, you can skip it with the assurance that you’re not missing all that much. It’s definitely an interesting experience, but “The Simpsons Game” is definitely a step behind the pack of great licensed games.
    Final rating: 6 out of 10 “Decent”
    Expand
  6. Jan 7, 2017
    6
    Well this is one average game. It isn't bad but it isn't that good. Though the ps2 version is worse. The controls are not that great. The camera is about broken, and the story is nothing special. There are more negatives but the ones I mentioned are the worst of them all. The best positives is the graphics are great. The cutscences are excellent. Most of them are all in the style of theWell this is one average game. It isn't bad but it isn't that good. Though the ps2 version is worse. The controls are not that great. The camera is about broken, and the story is nothing special. There are more negatives but the ones I mentioned are the worst of them all. The best positives is the graphics are great. The cutscences are excellent. Most of them are all in the style of the show but a few are done in te engine and the voice acting in these cutscences are perfect. They got all the voice actors from the show. And overall the platforming is fun and creative. Again, not bad, but not great. Expand
Metascore
71

Mixed or average reviews - based on 30 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 30
  2. Negative: 1 out of 30
  1. 77
    Had it offered online cooperative play, or local co-op play that was actually as much fun as the single-player game (if not more so) then the score would definitely be higher, but as it stands The Simpsons is a very enjoyable, though very, very short, single-player game that both hardcore and casual Simpsons fans will love.
  2. The bothersome camera often gets stuck, thus obscuring your vision and two-player split screen messes with the game's speed, but the exclusive clips and humorous presentation make this a must play, especially for diehard Simpsons fans.
  3. The gameplay might not be anything special, but The Simpsons Game delivers more than enough laughs to make it worth a look.