- Publisher: Activision
- Release Date: Feb 19, 2008
- Also On: PC, PlayStation 2, Xbox 360
- Summary:
Buy Now
- Developer: Activision
- Genre(s): Action, Shooter, Shooter, First-Person, Historic, Historic, Arcade
- Cheats: On GameFAQs
- More Details and Credits »
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 0 out of 7
-
Mixed: 0 out of 7
-
Negative: 7 out of 7
-
The History Channel: Battle for the Pacific isn't necessarily an atrocious game, but it just isn't that fun and brings so very little to the table.
-
There are a ton of fine shooters hitting shelves this year that are good enough to go down in history. It would be a shame to waste your money paying full price for this heap, which instead takes history down with it.
-
Battle for the Pacific brings zilch to an already overstuffed corner of the market. Don't let the discounted price or the The History Channel branding fool you, the game is a poor attempt at historical immersion.
-
A bad game. You might assume that a company as reputable as the History Channel might take more care to protect their license, but it's clear that they just wanted to make a quick buck.
-
Battle for the Pacific is a perfect example of how you can produce a modern first person shooter with absolutely no level of innovation at all. Graphics, sound and controls all do their job without impressing but the overall gameplay is utterly mediocre and not worth your time or your money.
-
Playstation Official Magazine UKThe game taught us that Japan lost the war thanks to shattered AI and terrible clipping. [May 2008, p.111]
-
Ultimately, though, the biggest blow against the game is its brevity. You shouldn't have trouble clearing its single-player mode in two or three hours.
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 0 out of 1
-
Mixed: 0 out of 1
-
Negative: 1 out of 1
-
May 9, 2011
-