Medal of Honor

 PlayStation 3
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 317 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 182 out of 317
  2. Mixed: 107 out of 317
  3. Negative: 28 out of 317
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Syriamn
    Oct 13, 2012
    8
    This is one of those games which was bashed by negative reviews unfair in my opinion. It has a great single player campaign and a not so great but decent multiplayer. And the Tier 1 campaign gives you another way to replay the campaign. Liked it.
  2. FAM339
    Dec 26, 2012
    9
    In my point of view this game is more for people who have played this series since Medal Of Honor 1,because Medal Of Honor is not so "fancy" as "Call Of Duty" and "Battlefield",but it's a good shooter game,and Medal Of Honor is a classic.
  3. FrostyReviews
    Jan 13, 2013
    8
    I have to look back through my memory bank because I played this a while ago. The campaign was outstanding, I had no idea the ending would happen like it did. It was a really overall fun game. I am so glad I decided to sit down for a few hours and play the entire campaign, because if I wouldn't have, I would have not been able to live with myself. I felt compelled to do the campaign, justI have to look back through my memory bank because I played this a while ago. The campaign was outstanding, I had no idea the ending would happen like it did. It was a really overall fun game. I am so glad I decided to sit down for a few hours and play the entire campaign, because if I wouldn't have, I would have not been able to live with myself. I felt compelled to do the campaign, just like I have with every game I have ever had. The game blew my mind, and I never expected it to be like that. DICE did a really nice job on this game as well as they did with the Battlefield series. Highly recommended.… Expand
  4. savagejoe444
    May 29, 2013
    7
    EA's basically trying to do what CoD4 did, but it didn't work as well as they expected. There's still good in this reboot: The graphics are nice and the MP is good (as always), but the single-player story shouldv'e had more focus instead of the MP.
  5. EKS666
    Sep 8, 2013
    9
    This game was surprisingly good. I expected just a generic military shooter, but the story was extremely immersive and emotional, the graphics were above expectations, and the gameplay was very intuitive. There are many, many memorable parts of the campaign. The multiplayer is not as sophisticated as call of duty, but is still very fun, and has a good leveling system with improvements toThis game was surprisingly good. I expected just a generic military shooter, but the story was extremely immersive and emotional, the graphics were above expectations, and the gameplay was very intuitive. There are many, many memorable parts of the campaign. The multiplayer is not as sophisticated as call of duty, but is still very fun, and has a good leveling system with improvements to weapons and other tactical advantages. I would recommend this game to any fan of military shooters, or as an introduction to the game genre.… Expand
  6. SJ-ULTI-Reiews
    Sep 27, 2013
    5
    Medal of Honor tries to reboot the once great franchise but fails miserably. The story mode is decent but very boring, the gameplay is okay. The graphics are bad, texture pop ins and framerate drops all the time, multiplayer is abandoned no one plays anymore. This is a game that you shouldint waste more than $5 on.
  7. Krizuwe
    Nov 19, 2013
    5
    Sinceramente un fracaso Jugabilidad: los controles del BBC2 eran distintos, como era de esperar, como este MoH es una copia de la competencia cambiaron los controles. en cuanto a la jugabilidad es muy mala, pareciera que el personaje pesara 300kg y su gordura no lo dejara subir ni pasar por los lugares donde deberia. Graficos: estamos en el 2010 se podria haber hecho algo mucho mejor, enSinceramente un fracaso Jugabilidad: los controles del BBC2 eran distintos, como era de esperar, como este MoH es una copia de la competencia cambiaron los controles. en cuanto a la jugabilidad es muy mala, pareciera que el personaje pesara 300kg y su gordura no lo dejara subir ni pasar por los lugares donde deberia. Graficos: estamos en el 2010 se podria haber hecho algo mucho mejor, en lo que es la campaña mas de la mitad del juego es en ambientes de noche con graficos pesimos. Tecnologia: Donde esta? Sonido: este es el mejor punto del juego, realmente se siente muy bien cdo se esta en modo multijugador, eso si varias veces aparece un bug en el sonido y si hay explosiones, disparos, gritos al mismo tiempo, algo de todo eso no lo vas a escuchar. Innovacion: 0 ni un poco de imaginacion pudieron tener. Singleplayer: aca esta lo peor del juego, muy corto, la historia muy pobre, los niveles todos lineales y aburridos. la inteligencia artificial parece de un juego de gameboy. lo jugue en modo dificil y aun asi me parecio muy facil. Tier 1 mode: que se puede decir de un modo total y absolutamente al PEDO. para que un modo que tengas que hacer todo de vuelta para comprar el tiempo, y los tiros en la cabeza, tranquilamente estos datos se pueden recopilar cdo haces la carrera. una mierda. Multiplayer: aca es donde se ve mejor y donde deberias divertirte mas, pero no. Los mapas, una cagada, solo es enfrentarse de un lado y del otro constantemente, sin poder flanquear y dejandole todo el merito a los putos camper. encima los mapas depende del modo que jueges, si por ejemplo solo te gusta el modo de team deathmatch solo vas a usar 3 putos mapas. si usas el sector control otros 2 mapas de mierda mas. La jugabilidad otra cagada, teniendo un arma de francotirador, con todas las miras y demas pelotudeces 4 tiros en la cabeza al enemigo y nisiquiera lo toca. no se si es error de los mapas o que bosta pero me ha hecho enojar por demas. Los movimientos, muy irreales. caen y vuelan como bolsas de papas. Las explosiones, si no tiras un RPG justo entre los ojos del enemigo no lo vas a matar, una mentira total Las armas: otra basura. las armas de los marines siempre son mejores que las de opfor, por supuesto sino que carajo hace un juego yanqui de mierda perdiendo contra los talibanes. asi esten configuradas igual el francotirador de marine mata a un solo tiro, mientras que el otro desde el mismo lugar con la misma configuracion solo toca al adversario.… Expand
  8. onewarmslime
    Mar 24, 2014
    5
    Τhis is one game that really disappointed me. I had played a MoH game on the PC (don’t remember exactly which) and it was really cool. This one kinda blows. The missions have no flow (sometimes the action completely halts because you have to do something that isn’t obvious at all to get the objectives going, like go stand on a rock or return to your team that is idleing for no reason by aΤhis is one game that really disappointed me. I had played a MoH game on the PC (don’t remember exactly which) and it was really cool. This one kinda blows. The missions have no flow (sometimes the action completely halts because you have to do something that isn’t obvious at all to get the objectives going, like go stand on a rock or return to your team that is idleing for no reason by a wall). This is a very scripted game and that kinda kills it. Also the game is very short as you can easily complete it within 5 hours. The graphics are kinda lame for a 2010 game and the framerate isn’t even consistently good at all and you have a pretty bad game. For under 10 bucks though, you could buy this for a weekend of fun.… Expand
  9. fijiboy
    Apr 21, 2014
    6
    the campaign is fun, the multiplayer is challenging, and the graphics look great. nothing really stands out in this game though, which upsets me because one of my favorite FPS's was medal of honor frontline
  10. Termin8ter
    Jun 17, 2016
    7
    EA LA has decide to reboot the forgotten Medal of Honor franchise, developing the campaign while DICE, the famed Battlefield developer creates the multiplayer for MoH. How does it turn out? Average. The campaign is forgettable, though it tries to be realistic, it's ultimately forgettable and average. The gunplay isn't very good either. Now, the meat of the game, multiplayer. It runs on theEA LA has decide to reboot the forgotten Medal of Honor franchise, developing the campaign while DICE, the famed Battlefield developer creates the multiplayer for MoH. How does it turn out? Average. The campaign is forgettable, though it tries to be realistic, it's ultimately forgettable and average. The gunplay isn't very good either. Now, the meat of the game, multiplayer. It runs on the same engine as Bad Company 2, and holds some noticeable similarities to BC2, but it definitely feels different. Unfortunately, the multiplayer is fun in some areas, but falls short of being as good as BC2's. At least this game comes with early access to the Battlefield 3 beta, and that's the only reason you'd want to buy this game. Overall, MoH is a weak attempt to reboot the dead MoH franchise, that fails miserably. Don't buy this game.… Expand
  11. Chsyphyrus
    Dec 20, 2015
    10
    I really liked the single player mode but the multiplayer mode sucked tiny pathways and also not enough weapons. The game has a lot of details in the graphics the ending was awesome and the characters are lovable
  12. Broyax
    Apr 16, 2017
    4
    La merde vole très bas et on vous a appelé pour faire le ménage chez les sauvages : un signe de croix avant d'y aller, quelques récitations du petit livre bleu étoilé de la propagande de l'armée américaine (honneur, patrie, hamburger) et c'est parti pour massacrer des enturbannés en masse.

    Vos potes rangers ont fière allure, notamment ce barbu avec des lunettes de soleil trop stylées et    La merde vole très bas et on vous a appelé pour faire le ménage chez les sauvages : un signe de croix avant d'y aller, quelques récitations du petit livre bleu étoilé de la propagande de l'armée américaine (honneur, patrie, hamburger) et c'est parti pour massacrer des enturbannés en masse.

    Vos potes rangers ont fière allure, notamment ce barbu avec des lunettes de soleil trop stylées et une casquette à l'envers, genre Papy babacool soixante-huitard qui s'en va casser du bou... euh apporter la paix et la démocratie à un pays qui a 700 ans de retard.

    Franchement, c'est assez divertissant... du moins au début et malgré le doublage québécois assez rebutant. Mais plus on progresse par la suite, plus les ennemis résistent aux balles, sauf lorsqu'on leur tire dans la tête (quand même). La campagne est scriptée à mort mais bien fichue dans l'ensemble, d'autant plus dommage alors lorsque quelques scripts se mettent parfois à déconner, vous obligeant à recharger le dernier point de sauvegarde...

    C'est typé arcade et pas réaliste pour un sou mais ça se manie très bien à la manette et puis le moteur utilisé, le Frostbite (sic) reproduit merveilleusement les extérieurs : c'est assez beau grâce à un éclairage de grande qualité. Evidemment, ça se torche vite fait et ça s'oublie tout aussi vite et le multi plein de kikoos (accessible même sans cette connerie de passe en ligne EA, Dieu merci) donne surtout envie d'éjecter le disque. Bref, un jeu macgerbale qui passe le temps quand on a faim.    … Expand
  13. Alex_Pilgrim008
    Mar 11, 2019
    7
    EA's modern day reboot of the MOH franchise is enjoyable, but disposable. The campaign was made by Danger Close, while the multiplayer was developed by DICE. The two modes feel completely different. The combat in both is entertaining, but uninspired. Fans of DICE's "Battlefield" franchise will probably get some enjoyment with the online matches. However, the multiplayer lacks the depth ofEA's modern day reboot of the MOH franchise is enjoyable, but disposable. The campaign was made by Danger Close, while the multiplayer was developed by DICE. The two modes feel completely different. The combat in both is entertaining, but uninspired. Fans of DICE's "Battlefield" franchise will probably get some enjoyment with the online matches. However, the multiplayer lacks the depth of the BF games. The campaign feels like a "Modern Warfare" ripoff. It's fun, but forgettable. The PS3 edition includes an the HD port of "Medal of Honor: Frontline" which is a nice extra. Overall, I would give this reboot a 7.5 out of 10.… Expand
  14. TheSnitchfather
    Sep 9, 2020
    9
    9/10
    I actually liked it, not a lot of weapon options because you mostly play the weapons you start with and there is absolutely no way to change side arms, but the weapons that it did have to offer were still great and the sound effects are once again superior to CoD.
    But it was finally a modern shooter, with not all the overdone Hollywood action bullsh*t that BF and CoD have, not    9/10
    I actually liked it, not a lot of weapon options because you mostly play the weapons you start with and there is absolutely no way to change side arms, but the weapons that it did have to offer were still great and the sound effects are once again superior to CoD.
    But it was finally a modern shooter, with not all the overdone Hollywood action bullsh*t that BF and CoD have, not saying they're bad at all, both have games I absolutely love, but this is a refreshment, you're also not such a bullet-sponge as you are in the other 2 franchises, couple bullets and you drop. Story was decent, but extremely short and i mean EXTREMELY. You could easily play through it in about 2 hours.    … Expand
  15. Dexterwait
    Jul 3, 2022
    6
    The story feels very average
    Towards the end i was starting to think that the predator in the sky was the only thing enjoyable

    It looks like they tried competing with COD: Modern warfare But it just ended up feeling like a miss step They really tried but the game feels very generic and bland
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

88
#88 Best PS3 Game of 2010
12
#12 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2010
37
#37 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2010

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 56 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 35 out of 56
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 56
  3. Negative: 0 out of 56
  1. Cynamite
    Jan 16, 2011
    80
    A successful comeback of the Medal of Honor-series, which is far away from reaching the top-ranks of the shooter genre. The short amount of the single-player campaign is really annoying.
    Read full review
  2. Absolute Games
    Jan 15, 2011
    60
    Medal of Honor doesn't become the current image of Electronic Arts – probably the most "humane" of all videogame corporations. Danger Close Games' debut reminds of a time when EA was a gloomy assembly line churning out soulless yearly sequels and movie tie-ins.
    Read full review
  3. Gamereactor Denmark
    Jan 13, 2011
    80
    Medal of Honor is the thinking man's Call of Duty. If you like shooting terrorists but felt the story and campaign of Modern Warfare 2 was too darn stupid, this is the game for you. Mechanically it's close to its competitor, but content-wise it's a class better and more thoughtful. It's an enjoyable if short experience that is bound to leave a lasting impression.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »