Medal of Honor

 PlayStation 3
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 317 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 182 out of 317
  2. Mixed: 107 out of 317
  3. Negative: 28 out of 317
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. djknucklez1
    Oct 12, 2010
    10
    MOH blew me away! Great story in campaign mode,a bit short, but it left me wanting even more. The multiplayer follows the Bad Company 2 style but with an arcade feel that really fits perfectly. I'm really glad to see the MOH franchise return. I can't wait for the next installments, which I'm sure will surpass this great title.
  2. Sideburn_Slayer
    Oct 14, 2010
    10
    Medal of honor is epic! Gotta love the US military! Some of the US ranger missions are the best! The Multiplayer is absolutely mind boggling! So much adrenalin! I was sweating when playing! That says something!
  3. jomni
    Oct 14, 2010
    8
    Not a bad game. It does not beat Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2 but it sure matches it and does some parts better. I believe the single player experience is better here. It's basically a case of clearing a sector and proceeding to the next. In COD, you have to keep on moving forward to make the enemy stop spawning which gets quite frustrating and ridiculous. I have a problem withNot a bad game. It does not beat Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2 but it sure matches it and does some parts better. I believe the single player experience is better here. It's basically a case of clearing a sector and proceeding to the next. In COD, you have to keep on moving forward to make the enemy stop spawning which gets quite frustrating and ridiculous. I have a problem with multiplayer. Gameplay is more tactical forcing you take cover and move carefully instead of running around like crazy in COD. But the maps are quite small and poorly designed and this results into many cases of spawn camping and raping. I believe COD still has better designed and enjoyable multiplayer maps that this one.â… Expand
  4. Squanto
    Oct 14, 2010
    9
    I just don't see why people give such low scores... Is it because they are COD fans? whatever .... I think this is like Uncharted2 meets COD MW2 ... It looks good and smooth and plays well ... the story grabs you So hey this is more of the same ... isn't each shooter more of the same?
    But the measure of realism has notched up some levels I think ... Just give it a chance ... and form your    I just don't see why people give such low scores... Is it because they are COD fans? whatever .... I think this is like Uncharted2 meets COD MW2 ... It looks good and smooth and plays well ... the story grabs you So hey this is more of the same ... isn't each shooter more of the same?
    But the measure of realism has notched up some levels I think ... Just give it a chance ... and form your own opinion ....
    Just enjoy it!    … Expand
  5. gameboy786
    Oct 14, 2010
    10
    Medal of honor is the most realistic game ive ever played. The graphics, the game mechanics, and the voice overs is definitely on point. War is not run and gun situations. You squeeze a couple and a couple of bodies drop and move little by little. The situations this game has never been seen in other games. This is definitely not a Modern Warfare copy cat. This game stands on its own 2.Medal of honor is the most realistic game ive ever played. The graphics, the game mechanics, and the voice overs is definitely on point. War is not run and gun situations. You squeeze a couple and a couple of bodies drop and move little by little. The situations this game has never been seen in other games. This is definitely not a Modern Warfare copy cat. This game stands on its own 2. Im very pleased that MOH came back this strong. Keep up the great work you guys are doing over there. Down with COD!!!… Expand
  6. Dark-Cat
    Oct 14, 2010
    9
    Despite this is my first review, I've played a lot of other games before, so I know what I'm saying.

    MOH deserved a 9. Singleplayer was better than anything I've played in a while, the events and locations were all closely linked to reality. (I'm a military fan myself.) It might not be the most realistic game you've ever played if you have ever played the ARMA series, but it's close    Despite this is my first review, I've played a lot of other games before, so I know what I'm saying.

    MOH deserved a 9. Singleplayer was better than anything I've played in a while, the events and locations were all closely linked to reality. (I'm a military fan myself.) It might not be the most realistic game you've ever played if you have ever played the ARMA series, but it's close enough. Since Danger Close have to impress the casual players as well, but they still manage to do a good job on that as well. did an amazing job on that. Though they should have also done MP as well.

    Multiplayer, on the other hand, was more like DICE was trying to make a MW2 ver. of BC2. But what it redeemed itself back on was the multiplayer maps and gameplay. The multiplayer uses fog to blind snipers from shooting a long range kill, making the game having less snipers, Also the gameplay and map was pretty well designed, forcing Team Cooperation without having one of the teammates to say so. If you run into a decent game, you'll find out most of your teammates are sticking together most of the time. Overall, this is a game definitely worth purchasing. It just lost 1 score the singleplayer story length and the multiplayer's lack of vehicles. But this game can take over MW2's place in your heart if you just give it a try, and you'll definitely be glad you did, even if you didn't like it in the end.    … Expand
  7. lkchan1114
    Oct 14, 2010
    9
    MoH takes you to the real battle zone! Enjoyed the story. Graphics could have been a little more refined, but a satisfying game overall. I'm looking forward to the sequel.
  8. CheapMerc
    Oct 14, 2010
    8
    What I been waiting for. was skeptical at first having read reviews. But now having played it, it is what I expected minus some polish. Single player is to be as expected, like said minus some polish. Same for multi player. Small things like pistol magazine addon model, looks unfinished for eg. I think is a good mid point between mw2 and bc2. I really enjoy the realism. Little things likeWhat I been waiting for. was skeptical at first having read reviews. But now having played it, it is what I expected minus some polish. Single player is to be as expected, like said minus some polish. Same for multi player. Small things like pistol magazine addon model, looks unfinished for eg. I think is a good mid point between mw2 and bc2. I really enjoy the realism. Little things like ejection port on correct side. But on other hand dont think they handle quiet real enough.I like the limited weapons as in real life the coalition and "T" elements dont use a massive variety of weapons. I enjoy MP in that it is realistic as in you go from cover to cover. The play modes feel good, as there is still fronts but you can still flank. Definitely could have used a few more maps and couple of hours longer single players. I think the game was a bit of a cause of not enough time.… Expand
  9. ghoststrykre
    Oct 15, 2010
    9
    First off, MOH has several bugs. Lighting can be odd at times and then suddenly fix itself, there is texture pop in at the beginning of levels in the campaign (lasts for about 3 seconds), and then there is an odd feeling to the running controls (if the left thumbstick is slightly pushed up and right, you might suddenly start strafing sideways rather than running diagonally). You'll findFirst off, MOH has several bugs. Lighting can be odd at times and then suddenly fix itself, there is texture pop in at the beginning of levels in the campaign (lasts for about 3 seconds), and then there is an odd feeling to the running controls (if the left thumbstick is slightly pushed up and right, you might suddenly start strafing sideways rather than running diagonally). You'll find most of your movement really needing to be controlled heavily by the right thumbstick in ways that many other games don't do. It's very difficult to describe, but just understand that its there.
    Now, the campaign starts off rough. To me the graphics and explosions looked okay. It certainly looked like the graphics were behind the curve of things, and sometimes even looked awful. Then it was as if I started a new level and all of my issues were gone. Suddenly the lighting in the game was incredible, and at times I found myself marvelling at how realistic characters looked due to the lighting and textures. I used to live in the Middle East for a short period of time and let me tell you, some of the background scenery (not the villages, those can seem a bit generic) were downright real looking. It truly is fun to stop for a second just to look at the marvelous visuals this game can have.
    Some transitions in scenes, or from running on foot to being in a vehicle, can be rough. Other times its smooth as butter. For all the effort EA put into immersion, I can't figure out why it is that when you turn on night vision you don't see the character reach to pull down his goggles/IR sensor. Just a thought.
    **Important** Modern Warfare 2 thrived on close quarters combat, surprises around every corner, and adrenaline in every button pressed. Here, Medal of Honor presents firefights that are medium to long range shooting. This is MORE realistic because honestly, special forces troops are stupid enough to blunder into enemies in close quarter combat 24/7 like they are portrayed to do in MW2. I found the gameplay mesmerizing and I am still loving it.
    Voice Acting = Incredible. MW2 had some decent voice acting, but the sound and voice acting in MOH blows it out of the water.
    Summary: Campaign = lots of fun, but unfortunately a lot of bugs.
    Multiplayer is still establishing itself with the community, but is largely fun. Even when getting dominated the game can still be fun. When someone gets a load of killstreaks back to back, ehhh, the game isn't as much fun. For the most part the multiplayer is a blast and with friends can be incredible. Unlock system seems like it should be a tad more in depth though, and soldier management should be more developed. Gameplay is awesome though.

    Long story short, this is a game with bugs that will almost definitely be fixed in the next MOH, but none of these bugs come close to ruining the fun experience of this game. Certain elements of scripted moments in the campaign may turn people off, but that was NOT the case for me. Rent this first and see if you like it, then buy it because I honestly am getting my moneys worth out of this game right now.    … Expand
  10. EsZett
    Oct 16, 2010
    8
    This game is short and static. My first play through (Hard) took about 5 hours. If you shoot at a bottle, it won't move or break. The SP game doesn't offer AAA eye candy. The Unreal 3 engine is not the best choice for a PS3 FPS game. You'll find a lot of blurry textures, pop up shadows and objects. After all the SP Game was fun to me, but too easy to accomplish. I wouldn't buy it at theThis game is short and static. My first play through (Hard) took about 5 hours. If you shoot at a bottle, it won't move or break. The SP game doesn't offer AAA eye candy. The Unreal 3 engine is not the best choice for a PS3 FPS game. You'll find a lot of blurry textures, pop up shadows and objects. After all the SP Game was fun to me, but too easy to accomplish. I wouldn't buy it at the full price only for the heavily scripted single player mode full al lot of AI-less (!) Taliban. The multiplayer mode (Frostbite 2 Engine) looks much better and will offer many hours of fun to you. (But still not that remarkable) (People who call this game "the best" or "perfect" are fans of this franchise that simply want to justify their buying. Sorry.)… Expand
  11. MySt1
    Oct 16, 2010
    8
    I don´t understand why the critics have rated this game only 7.5. I mean that even MW2 got something like 9.4. This game is lot better than MW2.Medal of Honor feels lot more realistic than Call Of Duty.The campaign and the multiplayer are both good.This was really a good reboot for Medal Of Honor. I hope that the next one is even better.
  12. gaz1983
    Oct 17, 2010
    8
    I really cant understand why this game has been rated so badly... ok it has a few bugs but what game dosn't. singleplayer is great fun and multiplayer although lacks polish is fun and engaging. it's basically like BFBC 2 multiplayer but on smaller maps. alot of fun alround
  13. northerngames
    Oct 17, 2010
    8
    The sound alone is worth the time spent going through the single-player game. I really didn't see anything horribly wrong with the graphics or anything technical that can spoil the experience otherwise. The multi-player is really enjoyable once you learn the angles. It has less of an arcade feel which is refreshing. No perks or crazy kill streaks. The maps are gritty. Fun game.
  14. kingjames
    Mar 3, 2011
    8
    I give this game a 8 out of 10
    ok MOH is pretty good in some ways better than COD. This game has more realism than COD which i like a lot. The graphics are really good, i enjoy being a Tier 1 Operator, sneaking around and shooting stuff up. The sound is amazing the bass as u pull the trigger of your M4 is great. story is alright most war films will maybe have a similar story line and the    I give this game a 8 out of 10
    ok MOH is pretty good in some ways better than COD. This game has more realism than COD which i like a lot. The graphics are really good, i enjoy being a Tier 1 Operator, sneaking around and shooting stuff up. The sound is amazing the bass as u pull the trigger of your M4 is great. story is alright most war films will maybe have a similar story line and the story is very short, i beat this game on HARD 2 times in 1 day, first because i enjoyed it but its really short. The Cons are glitches and framerate, i was on the last level and it was glitchy the whole time, kinda killed the mood. but on my second playthru it didnt happen as bad.

    Multiplayer is basically the same as Battlefield Bad Company 2 multiplayer. (both are made by DICE)
    so if u enjoyed bad company 2 multiplayer im sure u will enjoy MOH multiplayer.    … Expand
  15. godWhisperer
    May 20, 2011
    9
    this game looks great, the guns are awesome (especially the battle rifles!) and it's an all-around very solid, gritty and fun shooter. the sp is short but exhilarating and the mp is top of the line. the maps are much more confined than you'd see in, say, a battlefield game but it really doesn't play like a COD game (which is perhaps why it wasn't appreciated as the stellar game it is whenthis game looks great, the guns are awesome (especially the battle rifles!) and it's an all-around very solid, gritty and fun shooter. the sp is short but exhilarating and the mp is top of the line. the maps are much more confined than you'd see in, say, a battlefield game but it really doesn't play like a COD game (which is perhaps why it wasn't appreciated as the stellar game it is when it was released just a short while before black ops). the terrain is often much more vertical than that in duty and it just doesn't feel as frantic. it's certainly not a tactical sim or anything but the modern combat afghanistan setting makes it feel more realistic and exciting to me. i love shooters, and medal of honor is one of the best.… Expand
  16. EyeintheSky57
    Oct 12, 2010
    8
    Played on the PS3. Completed the campaign and about 8 hours of online play (all modes, maps, classes).

    Vast experience with 1st/3rd person shooters (well over 2000 hours). More of a BFBC2 guy then a MW2 guy. I rate the modes: Campaign: 9 Online: 6 The single-player part of this game is great. The story is compelling. Better and longer then MW2. Better then BFBC2. Graphics    Played on the PS3. Completed the campaign and about 8 hours of online play (all modes, maps, classes).

    Vast experience with 1st/3rd person shooters (well over 2000 hours). More of a BFBC2 guy then a MW2 guy.

    I rate the modes:

    Campaign: 9
    Online: 6

    The single-player part of this game is great. The story is compelling. Better and longer then MW2. Better then BFBC2. Graphics (in 720p) are somewhere in between those two games. Graphically lacks the polish of MW2 but the locales are magnificent... on par with Uncharted 2! (the best looking console game in history) It was incredible fighting in the mountains. The story is very linear, straight-forward, no nonsense. No collectibles or anything. Very theatrical. Would make a great movie.

    Multiplayer: Where do I start... First, this game WILL get a ton of patches just to get it working right. The lag was horrible. Balance is miserable. Guns have no recoil (therefore, no characteristics, no pros/cons except mag size and damage). Open mic in game but NO MIC in the "Party Lobby". Thats right... when you invite a couple of friends to your "Party" you HAVE to sit in silence until you enter the game. What? Talk about an online game requirement. Come on DICE, are you trying to sabotage the MOH name? Also, no mic between maps. Worst loading times of any game I have ever played.

    With one other member in my party, 8 times over 2 hours, we were split to opposite teams when joining a room. In 2 hours, I was booted due to server issues 5 times. Most of these issues will eventually be fixed.

    Maps/Modes: The maps look great. More realistic then any other game. MW2 is great in looks but lack some of the detail this game has. The junk in the streets and debris everywhere really add a nice touch. Game modes are all pretty standard. TDM, Rush (Attack/Defend), Capture the Flag, etc.

    Gameplay, though, is horrible. Seems like they tried to copy MW2 without just straight riping it off. The problem is, to have a game like MW2, you have to make it just like MW2 or it isn't any good. Plan to be killed instantly upon respawn at least 5 times a match. To be successful you really need to be a camper (sniper or other). Thats the only way to get a positive KDR on a regular basis. As always, if you can get 12 friends together that know what they are doing, you will to better then running with random people.

    In the ways this game is like MW2, MW2 does a lot better.

    In the ways this game is like BFBC2, BFBC2 does a lot better.    … Expand
  17. pixelgeek
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    Its solid & realistic, too bad that there are too many blind COD fanboys that will smash anyhing that is not COD, I personaly had MW2 & trade it for BBC2, because I like to go for the real thing, not the COD smoke & mirrors arcade/movie feel, If you want the best of both worlds go for MOH, Its got the solid single player that is longer than MW2 & the guys at DICE did a realistic in yourIts solid & realistic, too bad that there are too many blind COD fanboys that will smash anyhing that is not COD, I personaly had MW2 & trade it for BBC2, because I like to go for the real thing, not the COD smoke & mirrors arcade/movie feel, If you want the best of both worlds go for MOH, Its got the solid single player that is longer than MW2 & the guys at DICE did a realistic in your face Multiplayer.… Expand
  18. gamerinside
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    This game it`s good and well balanced, with an amazing story and the multiplayer it`s fun. The single player campaign is better crafted and this time the character-driven narrative takes a backseat to high-action gun fights, and fast-paced interdictions.
  19. Vandownbytheriv
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    I don't think the most hardcore gamers would agree with the reviews this game is receiving. And you are definitely not a hardcore gamer if your resume starts with Call of Duty and ends with Battlefield Heroes. There are way too many semi-gamers chiming in on this game that lack any real depth to their gaming experience. This game is exactly what it promised. It is gritty and much moreI don't think the most hardcore gamers would agree with the reviews this game is receiving. And you are definitely not a hardcore gamer if your resume starts with Call of Duty and ends with Battlefield Heroes. There are way too many semi-gamers chiming in on this game that lack any real depth to their gaming experience. This game is exactly what it promised. It is gritty and much more realistic, as realistic as a game can be, it is delivery of this genre. Nothing, that comes to my mind and I have been playing games since the late 70's, comes even close. Call of Duty is an awesome game but lacked the realism you feel with Medal of Honor. The weapons the radio chatter, the environments all make you feel like you are actually there. Now I am not saying that this game is perfect, it does have a few flaws. But they are minor at best. I can say that I am a little slanted in my point of view because I am not a huge multiplayer fan, as you usually end up with a bunch of people who figure out how to cheat and make that part of most gaming a joke. That being said my opinion is based mostly on the single player side of this game, so take my review for what it is worth. But if you enjoy a good solid single player game, go get this one. You not be disappointed.… Expand
  20. 14duke
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    I can't believe all the low scores MOH has received. This is the most fun I have had with a FPS since COD MW. The game looks incredible and the controls are tight. The campaign is a little short; around 7 hours, but it more than makes up for it with a highly compelling and submersive story. The multiplayer is one of the more realistic FPSs out. While playing the multiplayer, I felt likeI can't believe all the low scores MOH has received. This is the most fun I have had with a FPS since COD MW. The game looks incredible and the controls are tight. The campaign is a little short; around 7 hours, but it more than makes up for it with a highly compelling and submersive story. The multiplayer is one of the more realistic FPSs out. While playing the multiplayer, I felt like I was in a real battle without the chance of dying. A lot of people think, that in order to have a great multiplayer, the game must be loaded down with useless stuff like MW2. MOH is a great game and should be played by anyone who is a FPS fan.… Expand
  21. drezzo
    Oct 13, 2010
    8
    MOH always delivers a great story in their campaigns (unlike COD's boring stories), and this game continued that streak. The sound was simply amazing and graphics looked great. It was disappointing, however, when the game would get really buggy during a busy fight scene. I am also disappointed with the length of the campaign (way too short) and the absence of coop mode. For theMOH always delivers a great story in their campaigns (unlike COD's boring stories), and this game continued that streak. The sound was simply amazing and graphics looked great. It was disappointing, however, when the game would get really buggy during a busy fight scene. I am also disappointed with the length of the campaign (way too short) and the absence of coop mode. For the multiplayer, I really wish that Danger Close could have done both the SP and MP. Although similar, MP just doesn't have the same great effects as SP. I have lost all confidence in DICE and will not be buying games they develop anymore :( Overall, the positives definitely outweigh the negatives, and I will still be playing the multiplayer for awhile (at least until black ops comes out)… Expand
  22. SixDelt822
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    This game is a good mix of Battlefield and Call of Duty. The Campaign is good with a good story line but has some minor technical issues. You can tell they spent more time with the multiplayer then they did with the campaign. The multiplayer needs to have a few more game modes and maps which I am sure will come later. If you like modern FPS then you will like this game unless you are aThis game is a good mix of Battlefield and Call of Duty. The Campaign is good with a good story line but has some minor technical issues. You can tell they spent more time with the multiplayer then they did with the campaign. The multiplayer needs to have a few more game modes and maps which I am sure will come later. If you like modern FPS then you will like this game unless you are a Call of Duty fan boy and that's the only game you play.… Expand
  23. oval
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    This is easily one of the most underrated games of 2010; given that this is basically 2 seperate games in one package i'd like to rate the SP and MP seperately.

    SP, I would give an 9.0; and I won't state any big reasons why other than that its an excellent campaign with only a few minor technical flaws which is why I deduct one point from the score. MP, I would give an 8.0; the    This is easily one of the most underrated games of 2010; given that this is basically 2 seperate games in one package i'd like to rate the SP and MP seperately.

    SP, I would give an 9.0; and I won't state any big reasons why other than that its an excellent campaign with only a few minor technical flaws which is why I deduct one point from the score.

    MP, I would give an 8.0; the reason being is that it has a great foundation but it needs tweaking, also there is not quite enough maps, therefore I deduct 1 point for each flaw.

    While this is definitely not a game for everyone, if you like military games that require you to at least think about what you're doing, you'll enjoy this. I would HIGHLY recommend combat mission and objective raid multiplayer modes over team assault and sector control. The multiplayer is definitely at its best in combat mission, and objective raid is a close second.

    Overall, i'm giving this a user score of 9, simply because I feel that while I would rate the mp 8; it is getting a patch very soon which will fix a lot of the issues; and DICE did listen to some of the user issues for a day 1 patch and added things like muzzle climb and so on, because of this I feel it brings it to an overall 9.    … Expand
  24. gameguy21
    Oct 13, 2010
    8
    This game is hands down amazing. From sounds,Visuals, and overall experience. I have not ran through the singleplayer except the first level. Ive been to stuck on Multiplayer. Yes, its Frostbite and no its not BC2. Similar yeah, but a totally new way to play. Very Tactical and thought Driven, u need to stay focused and play smart if you plan to stay alive. the guns all have a unique soundThis game is hands down amazing. From sounds,Visuals, and overall experience. I have not ran through the singleplayer except the first level. Ive been to stuck on Multiplayer. Yes, its Frostbite and no its not BC2. Similar yeah, but a totally new way to play. Very Tactical and thought Driven, u need to stay focused and play smart if you plan to stay alive. the guns all have a unique sound and feel to them. I love this game. True, multiplayer could be a little richer, but its a new release. And by that i mean more weapons and maps. But don't let that stop you form picking it up, because you will not regret it. I give it an 8 out of 10 easy. Trust me everyone, judge it for yourself. If you want a tactical experience with a fresh look and feel get MOH, if you want a run and gun. Go with Black Ops, my type of style is more BC2 and MOH for sure. More thought behind it. Also, you Get the Beta For Battlefield 3. You really have nothing to lose. Great Game, Best FPS for sure after Bad Company 2. Enjoy every second of it.… Expand
  25. vyruzreaper
    Oct 13, 2010
    10
    Great game. The speed is a little too fast but it is MUCH better than MW2 and on par with battlefield. What is going to really make or break this game as the best FPS is the future map packs. If they create decent sized maps then it will be a true winner as the best FPS to date. The sounds are amazing, graphics are on par with most other games and menus are well layed out. Cant wait to getGreat game. The speed is a little too fast but it is MUCH better than MW2 and on par with battlefield. What is going to really make or break this game as the best FPS is the future map packs. If they create decent sized maps then it will be a true winner as the best FPS to date. The sounds are amazing, graphics are on par with most other games and menus are well layed out. Cant wait to get my beard :D… Expand
  26. ModernUnit
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    Theres a reason why review sites gave this game average scores. Every review has the words "Modern Warfare 2" and "Call of Duty". For Christs sake, why does Call of Duty have to be a benchmark for every FPS game. Look at MW2 user score on Metacritic, then compare that to Medal of Honor. This game is great. Its a new refreshing feeling from Modern Warfare 2. You dont get OMA-DC noob tubedTheres a reason why review sites gave this game average scores. Every review has the words "Modern Warfare 2" and "Call of Duty". For Christs sake, why does Call of Duty have to be a benchmark for every FPS game. Look at MW2 user score on Metacritic, then compare that to Medal of Honor. This game is great. Its a new refreshing feeling from Modern Warfare 2. You dont get OMA-DC noob tubed and commando knifed from across the map. Medal of Honor is a good game.… Expand
  27. JohnPS3
    Oct 13, 2010
    10
    First of all, DONT COMPARE TO CALL OF DUTY. This game is awesome it is alot like battlefield n call of duty only more..... realistic i guess is the word. Its fun and engaging the multiplayer is awesome too if you are a DICE fan theres no way its a zero or u wont like it unless your a idiot or a FANBOY like meatsmuggler i would say this is one of may fav fps of all time n deserves alotFirst of all, DONT COMPARE TO CALL OF DUTY. This game is awesome it is alot like battlefield n call of duty only more..... realistic i guess is the word. Its fun and engaging the multiplayer is awesome too if you are a DICE fan theres no way its a zero or u wont like it unless your a idiot or a FANBOY like meatsmuggler i would say this is one of may fav fps of all time n deserves alot better reviews than what its got i dont think its right to compare to call of duty i saw review it as its own game because thats what it is.The shooting is smooth, the weapons are awesome, the knife sticks are the best, the graphics are great, and multiplayer rocks. The story is good but not the best of course when has a war shooter ever needed a great story. The game is awesome and deserves better.… Expand
  28. dlfootball72
    Oct 12, 2010
    9
    This game deserves a Medal Of Honor for its compelling, rich story that gives respect to the soldier while making the game one of the most authentic compelling modern fps shooter to date. This game will be always compared to Call of Duty since it is taking a shot at the COD franchise and the fps genre it helped to define in the late 1990's. Single player campaign is a blast, whileThis game deserves a Medal Of Honor for its compelling, rich story that gives respect to the soldier while making the game one of the most authentic compelling modern fps shooter to date. This game will be always compared to Call of Duty since it is taking a shot at the COD franchise and the fps genre it helped to define in the late 1990's. Single player campaign is a blast, while Multiplayer leaves you wanting more but its shortcomings are far outweighed by the beautiful vistas and authenticity. If you are on the fence about this game, hit yourself upside the head and go out and buy it, you will not regret your purchase it is one of the finest fps to hit this year.… Expand
  29. j-dog007
    Oct 16, 2010
    9
    Most realistic shooter ever made, campaign mode is a little short but the tier 1 & online make up for it giving you a lot of things to do & people to kill.
  30. kshastry
    Oct 12, 2010
    10
    this is the best first person shooter game. The game is better than call of duty: modern warfare, the single player mode is amazing. The best game of the year, Awesome!!
  31. powderrider4105
    Oct 26, 2010
    10
    This game is one of my favorite games in the past year. Not only does it surpass all of the Call Of Duties, it lives up all the other MOH games. People need to realize what war would be like. Its a slower paced, sniper dominated era. NOT walking around with a noobtube or running around with a Knife. I give this game 2 thumbs up and suggest it to anyone, not only the Multiplayer, butThis game is one of my favorite games in the past year. Not only does it surpass all of the Call Of Duties, it lives up all the other MOH games. People need to realize what war would be like. Its a slower paced, sniper dominated era. NOT walking around with a noobtube or running around with a Knife. I give this game 2 thumbs up and suggest it to anyone, not only the Multiplayer, but the story as well… Expand
  32. Phippsy
    Oct 20, 2010
    8
    If I read one more COD or Battlefield comparison with MOH i'm going to scream! MOH needs to be looked at as its own game, not a clone of another game. Yes it is a FPS and yes it revolves around a war but that's where the comparisons should cease. The single player campaign is around 4-5 hours long but really, for a FPS that is long enough. Danger Close have done a great job giving us aIf I read one more COD or Battlefield comparison with MOH i'm going to scream! MOH needs to be looked at as its own game, not a clone of another game. Yes it is a FPS and yes it revolves around a war but that's where the comparisons should cease. The single player campaign is around 4-5 hours long but really, for a FPS that is long enough. Danger Close have done a great job giving us a polished game. From the intense gun fights to shooting terrorist bunkers from a chopper, all is in good fun. The sniper missions are also great. The only 2 issues I ran into on the single player is that sometimes your team would get stuck in a motion. All I did was walk up to them, whack them with a little friendly fire and they were back on the mission at hand. The second bug was that sometimes in cut scenes the audio would cut out for a second here and there. Definitely not a deal breaker. On the multiplayer, i have played for around 15 hours so far and am thoroughly enjoying it. In my own experience with the game, i find that it takes me back to the Counter-strike days. Some of the maps just have a certain feel about them. I did have drop outs the first day from purchasing the game but haven't had one drop out since then. EA must have worked on their servers. With the single player and multiplayer in one package (and free DLC coming next month), I would definitely recommend this game to any FPS fan who is not in love with one particular franchise.… Expand
  33. moltonasty
    Nov 11, 2010
    8
    This was a very enjoyable game. In terms of single player I would say this game was great, although not quite as exciting as the campaign in MW2. However, in terms of multiplayer I think this has all of the CoD games beat. I just prefer the flow of combat, controls, and maps on this game personally. From a gameplay perspective I prefer this to Black Ops, but Black Ops just has moreThis was a very enjoyable game. In terms of single player I would say this game was great, although not quite as exciting as the campaign in MW2. However, in terms of multiplayer I think this has all of the CoD games beat. I just prefer the flow of combat, controls, and maps on this game personally. From a gameplay perspective I prefer this to Black Ops, but Black Ops just has more gameplay modes thanks to zombies and all that. There are a few laggy moments both in campaign and online, so if they can improve on that and add a longer campaign mode plus add some more unique game modes, I think the sequel can go up to a 9 or more in terms of quality. Still an awesome game all around...I'm not really understanding the haters for this game.… Expand
  34. B-Knock
    Nov 11, 2010
    10
    First off i would like to say EA made the mistake by having two different developers work on the game. Danger close and DICE. The single player campaign is alright and seems rushed on development. The graphics are great, and the story is awesome. The only downfall is the game engine, which makes the game's overall feel a bit out dated. Danger close used the unreal engine, which is the sameFirst off i would like to say EA made the mistake by having two different developers work on the game. Danger close and DICE. The single player campaign is alright and seems rushed on development. The graphics are great, and the story is awesome. The only downfall is the game engine, which makes the game's overall feel a bit out dated. Danger close used the unreal engine, which is the same engine used to make gears of war. The game engine is outdated and they should of used frostbite 1.5 from DICE. The multi-player side of this game is great! very simple and this uses frostbite 1.5 from DICE. This is a perfect combination of Battlefield bad company 2 and modern warfare 2. Its simple leveling system and low selection of guns really keep the game simple. Games usually last 15mins to 5 mins which is great for people who can't sit in front of a tv for 12 hours a day. This game overall is well done but needs more work on the single player side.… Expand
  35. himynameissudip
    Oct 14, 2010
    9
    if you can look past the glaring lack of polish, this reboot can really be a value. while it doesn't add much new to game play, everything done is solid, minus the polish. the story is minimum but powerful for what it is. very authentic and emotionally powerful at the end. the campaign is varied but a tad short. however, its shooting mechanics are not cutting edge. the multi player hasif you can look past the glaring lack of polish, this reboot can really be a value. while it doesn't add much new to game play, everything done is solid, minus the polish. the story is minimum but powerful for what it is. very authentic and emotionally powerful at the end. the campaign is varied but a tad short. however, its shooting mechanics are not cutting edge. the multi player has technical flaws but delivers a solid experience. if you're the kind of person that doesn't wince at glitches, with an interest in a authentic story, this might be the shooter for you.… Expand
  36. Saint
    Oct 17, 2010
    9
    Medal of Honor was a game I had low expectations for, I was wrong. It was a lot of fun, albit a little easy on normal by which I was able to go through with just the pistol and the knife and beat the game, still a hoot for me and my friend. The single player was great fun even if it was very short. The only reason I do not give a 10 out of 10 to this fine game is because of theMedal of Honor was a game I had low expectations for, I was wrong. It was a lot of fun, albit a little easy on normal by which I was able to go through with just the pistol and the knife and beat the game, still a hoot for me and my friend. The single player was great fun even if it was very short. The only reason I do not give a 10 out of 10 to this fine game is because of the Multiplayer, It is quite literally a sniper rifle fest, I had trouble with many maps because of that. I found even when we played our little game here in a realistic state and not as if we were playing gears of war we were still pretty much out gunned by sniper rifle spam and tali-ban that some how obtained weapons that they have a near 0% chance of accessing anyway.… Expand
  37. Dario_90
    Oct 18, 2010
    9
    This game is very good. It's starts kinda relaxing and when the story evolves so does the action. Great storyline and the characters are good. Good singleplayer. Intense, emotional. Love it. To bad that it's short. When you are really in the story you will see the credits already. Thankfully there is Tier1 mode and the multiplayer. So you won't get that feeling that you want more. TheThis game is very good. It's starts kinda relaxing and when the story evolves so does the action. Great storyline and the characters are good. Good singleplayer. Intense, emotional. Love it. To bad that it's short. When you are really in the story you will see the credits already. Thankfully there is Tier1 mode and the multiplayer. So you won't get that feeling that you want more. The graphics are beautiful. Sometimes pop up, but it is not very disturbing. The scenes are very realistic and intense. Great game! 9/10… Expand
  38. judgefudge121
    Oct 21, 2010
    10
    there is something fishy going on here. this game should be praised on all levels for the orginality and substance that it brings to the war game scene. nobody likes change, but cmon, call of duty black ops better be brand spanking original or im going to be pissed, you can only ride the same train for so long until you run out of stations. its time to move on, move ahead and move foward,there is something fishy going on here. this game should be praised on all levels for the orginality and substance that it brings to the war game scene. nobody likes change, but cmon, call of duty black ops better be brand spanking original or im going to be pissed, you can only ride the same train for so long until you run out of stations. its time to move on, move ahead and move foward, and the beacon showing us the way spells M.O.H. the singleplayer is not flawless, but no game in the history of game development ever is. There are a few texture pops, but no screen tears or signs that the console cant handle the engine, so all in all it runs smoother than the bonnet of a porsche. gameplay can only be described in one word, flow. i didnt fight my way through the maps i sort of flowed through them on a tidal wave of hail and bullets. there is sometimes so much going on it becomes very easy to die. much like a real war, it can sometimes take one very strategically placed bullet from and an advantaged position and your out of the game. This is the first realistic war game that doesnt bore with realism. Whenever theres a lull in the gameplay your always entertained with the spectacular atmosphere and surroundings. this game is drop dead gorgeous, always a beauty to look at from start to finish. i dont know what the sh!t people are talking about with these reviews. I have made an account just to write this review in hopes that people wont fall for this **** thats been cracking around metacritic and most reviewing sites. those poor buggers at danger close, putting in all this effort to completely rework the war franchise and medal of honour gets put down because lets face it, its medal of honour. I havent been thrilled like this with medal of honour since the days of frontline on the ps2, storming the beaches at normandy on that first level. Do you remember that feeling? that epic feeling? it got better with age.
    multiplayer is not cod. multiplayer is not battlefield 2 bad company. It is the best of both worlds. i sh!t you not, i started playing the multiplayer at around 10 pm, played a few rounds, got lost in the game, looked outside and it was day. this is addicitive be warned. the maps on dm are small and tight, making for some furious gameplay and run-and-gun action, and the conquest style mission mode maps are huge, i say again, by the power of greyskull, why is this game being flamed. do yourself an honour, by this game, it is well worth the money and will keep you more entertained than any other game you currrently have.    … Expand
  39. smeghead25
    Oct 22, 2010
    9
    For those who complain it was a short game, you bought Modern Warfare 2 didn't you? At least MOH was longer than that pitiful campaign. And MOH does it a lot better. It puts you in the shoes of three different characters as they attempt to ascend the Shahikot Mountains and eliminate the Taliban threat. The game does not try to sell itself to you as an 'epic' storyline, it is simply whatFor those who complain it was a short game, you bought Modern Warfare 2 didn't you? At least MOH was longer than that pitiful campaign. And MOH does it a lot better. It puts you in the shoes of three different characters as they attempt to ascend the Shahikot Mountains and eliminate the Taliban threat. The game does not try to sell itself to you as an 'epic' storyline, it is simply what MOH has always done, it puts you in the shoes of soldiers within a war as you tackle objectives that would not seem out of place in real life.

    Another thing I have read complaints about in reviews was that the auto-aim does everything for you. This is true to the extent that when you pull up the iron sights and it usually will lock onto a target. Just like in all the other CoD's. CoD wanted players to be constantly using iron sights and quickly releasing and pulling the left trigger in order to lock onto targets, and it always came across as cheap and unrealistic. MOH is meant to be a game where realism is key, so yes, you can runaround CoD-like and shoot everything thgat moves with the cheap lock on tactics, or you could play it as though it mattered. Most of the time I found myself walking into buildings with the pistol drawn, and moving out of buildings with the assault rifle already in iron sights. It makes sense. Real soldiers don't shift their eyes from the scope for a second to increase their accuracy, and therefore neither should you.

    Now, I remember Yahtzee or Movie Bob (someone anyway) had a go at Hydrophobia's developers because they told everyone that they only thought it was crap because they played it wrong. The argument was that if the game doesn't do a good job of pointing out to you how to play it then it doesn't deserve that leeway. MOH however, constantly shows you your squad mates moving around with their eyes to their sights, moving slowly and checking corners. The first mission practically takes you by the hand for this process. So my only conclusion is that the haters of the auto-assist are playing it wrong. They've played too much unrealistic CoD to understand that sometimes they need to change their playstyle for new games.

    As far as graphics go, I've never cared. It occasionally looks very pretty, and seeing the mountain in the distance is wonderful. But sometimes there will be an abscence of textures and they'll take longer than usual to pop in. The scene most of you will have seen before where the goat stands up and you watch a team mate strangle an enemy was very jarring for me as the goat never loaded it's texture and as such was just a white glob smack bang in the middle of the screen.

    As far as gameplay goes, it's fun and solid. The occasional glitch may pop up, it froze entirely on one occasion and on another, I was stuck behind the team leader thanks to an invisible wall, and he was waiting for whatever trigger I was supposed to set off (and already had but it obviously missed it). Other than that I have no complaints however, it was a very solid game, even if it was a bit short, that did a fantastic job of putting you into the shoes of soldiers in their everday life. It is not an epic plot, it follows a few squads up a mountain attempting to eliminate the Taliban. It doesn't get much bigger than that for the most part, but it does do what it aims to do very well.

    As for online gameplay, I've never been big on it. But I hear mixed reviews of that too. I have to say though, I find it much more likely that the multiplayer is solid and that all the complainers are just upset that it isn't CoD.    … Expand
  40. BubbaHito
    Oct 24, 2010
    9
    This game received an unfair critical reception. It's reasonable to expect it to be compared to Modern Warfare 2, but thankfully EA/Danger Close decided to take the high road and add some more realistic and tactical aspects to a game whose genre has devolved into running around like a headless chicken. For instance, in Sector Control some good rules to learn and follow are;

    1) Don't run    This game received an unfair critical reception. It's reasonable to expect it to be compared to Modern Warfare 2, but thankfully EA/Danger Close decided to take the high road and add some more realistic and tactical aspects to a game whose genre has devolved into running around like a headless chicken. For instance, in Sector Control some good rules to learn and follow are;

    1) Don't run around in the open
    2) Understand how cover works
    3) Understand how streak bonuses can help
    4) When your location is compromised, run. I was worried that the beta's problems be included in the final release, but thankfully that's not the case. This ain't no MAG, that action is fast and fair as long as you know the rules. Well done, EA/Danger Close. I'm eagerly awaiting Medal of Honor 2.    … Expand
  41. THEMULLETT
    Oct 24, 2010
    8
    This game at first seemed to be original. Of course the singleplayer was, but on the other hand the multiplayer wasn't. It felt too much like battle field only more realistic. The campaign was short but enjoyable and memorable in the fact the the events and characters were based on actual events and people. Those people who say that MOH has fake guns have either never seen a gun in theirThis game at first seemed to be original. Of course the singleplayer was, but on the other hand the multiplayer wasn't. It felt too much like battle field only more realistic. The campaign was short but enjoyable and memorable in the fact the the events and characters were based on actual events and people. Those people who say that MOH has fake guns have either never seen a gun in their lives, or they are mentally challenged and should be institutionalized. End of story.… Expand
  42. Rob_Barker
    Oct 24, 2010
    8
    This game was just what I was hoping and looking for. The campaign has so far been providing brilliant entertainment value at the weekends, and the online also doesn't fail to deliver. Everything I've been after for a while now. Better than Op Flashpoint and a refreshing change from COD4 (Got bored with MW2 and went back to the original) This game is definately recommended.
  43. LittleMeow
    Nov 1, 2010
    8
    Medal of Honor is definitely a fun first person shooter. The story in the single player campaign is interesting and well thought out. It has a more realistic feel than Call of Duty MW ever has and doesn't disappoint with graphics.
    If people want to go play Call of Duty than play Call of Duty, but don't trash a game because it's different than your beloved, Call of Duty series.
    Medal of    Medal of Honor is definitely a fun first person shooter. The story in the single player campaign is interesting and well thought out. It has a more realistic feel than Call of Duty MW ever has and doesn't disappoint with graphics.
    If people want to go play Call of Duty than play Call of Duty, but don't trash a game because it's different than your beloved, Call of Duty series.
    Medal of Honor is definitely worth picking up and will not disappoint.    … Expand
  44. jshprcy
    Oct 27, 2010
    8
    My first impressions of this game were not so positive, but after giving it a chance and some time I thoroughly enjoy the multiplayer. It doesn't have quite as many features as Battlefield but I feel that DICE was aiming for that type of simplistic arcadey feel. The campaign isnt awful but it feels like a completely different game then the multiplayer because they had another developer,My first impressions of this game were not so positive, but after giving it a chance and some time I thoroughly enjoy the multiplayer. It doesn't have quite as many features as Battlefield but I feel that DICE was aiming for that type of simplistic arcadey feel. The campaign isnt awful but it feels like a completely different game then the multiplayer because they had another developer, Danger Close, working on that side of it. The campaign controls just don't feel as tight and responsive as the multiplayer or a game like Call of Duty. If you like Battlefield or Call of Duty I recommend Medal of Honor for its multiplayer. The campaign is the secondary selling point of this title.… Expand
  45. SifuGun
    Nov 8, 2010
    10
    Moh 2010 is the most precise, accurate, and graphically correct first person shooter ever made to date. And with Black Ops on it's way in one day. I can say after reviewing the B.o. trailers that Moh 2010 will still be the best PURE First Person Shooter out there. I also predict that many will defect from MW2 and BO after they become frustrated with the most important part of the game:Moh 2010 is the most precise, accurate, and graphically correct first person shooter ever made to date. And with Black Ops on it's way in one day. I can say after reviewing the B.o. trailers that Moh 2010 will still be the best PURE First Person Shooter out there. I also predict that many will defect from MW2 and BO after they become frustrated with the most important part of the game: SHOOTING. Much like many people are leaving MW2 to play BBC2 now. Ultimately they will both have their followings but if your serious about shooting MOH 2010 is the way to go. BO might woe you with it's colorful awards and other functions but No one can deny that SHOOTING is the most important part and MOH 2010 excels in this area.… Expand
  46. bnekic
    Nov 10, 2010
    10
    I really do enjoy this game, campaign and online multiplayer. If you stop comparing it to Call of Duty and just play it for what it is you'll begin to love it. I just recently bought Black Ops and was really disappointed with the online multiplayer portion so I traded it in and picked up Medal of Honor. I can't believe how horrible Treyarch made the graphics on multiplayer with Black Ops.I really do enjoy this game, campaign and online multiplayer. If you stop comparing it to Call of Duty and just play it for what it is you'll begin to love it. I just recently bought Black Ops and was really disappointed with the online multiplayer portion so I traded it in and picked up Medal of Honor. I can't believe how horrible Treyarch made the graphics on multiplayer with Black Ops. Anyways I do recommend Medal of Honor, great game!… Expand
  47. Chuxtrix
    Nov 18, 2010
    9
    Ok, Here we go! really Descent game.Great graphics and Lots of fun ,but I have to admit,I did expect more single campaign. action. Simply Fell way to short. Was kinda shocked when the credits came up and game over. I know most of these games are built around multiplayer and I did enjoy what I did get to play . Im not going to compare this to other games. I'm glad I own it and I will get myOk, Here we go! really Descent game.Great graphics and Lots of fun ,but I have to admit,I did expect more single campaign. action. Simply Fell way to short. Was kinda shocked when the credits came up and game over. I know most of these games are built around multiplayer and I did enjoy what I did get to play . Im not going to compare this to other games. I'm glad I own it and I will get my monies worth out of it. Anyways enjoy as I did.… Expand
  48. WoundedPatriot
    Nov 16, 2010
    9
    I bought this game while I was waiting on COD BO. The folks at GameStop recommended it, but did say that you will either love it or hate it. I love it. Finally a game that simulates real combat. You don't have all of those HALO players, who run around the maps, sort of willy nilly and shoot everything that moves. If you do that in MOH, you will get killed, as well you should have.I bought this game while I was waiting on COD BO. The folks at GameStop recommended it, but did say that you will either love it or hate it. I love it. Finally a game that simulates real combat. You don't have all of those HALO players, who run around the maps, sort of willy nilly and shoot everything that moves. If you do that in MOH, you will get killed, as well you should have. The sniper mode in this game is phenomenal. The designers actually allow you to stay in the back of the map and pick off unsuspecting opponents who are lurking around or sticking their head up. Way to Go! In the new COD BO, the sniper mode sucks unless you like to run around like a chicken with your head cut off, shooting people on the run. In COD, the kill-cam makes it IMPOSSIBLE to get into a good sniper's nest and wait for people to appear. The maps in MOH make sense in that they are laid out perfectly for combat missions. AND the best thing about MOH is that you have to work together to get anything accomplished. The designers have mastered that concept. If they put out more combat mission maps, we can leave COD forever. Or at least leave it to the jump up in the air HALO players and the "side to side" combatants who win most of the faceoffs. MEDAL OF HONOR IS A GREAT GAME.… Expand
  49. One_SIC_Ma666ot
    Feb 26, 2012
    10
    The best of the Modern War shooters. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  50. ubercake
    Apr 14, 2011
    9
    Should not even be compared to the Black Ops. It is far beyond that and you have to play it much differently. I played Black Ops for a few days and couldn't understand why Kobe would do the commercial. Medal of Honor is a far better game. The single player game is decent, but short. The multi-player aspect is the focus of this review.

    Most maps are tight and require different    Should not even be compared to the Black Ops. It is far beyond that and you have to play it much differently. I played Black Ops for a few days and couldn't understand why Kobe would do the commercial. Medal of Honor is a far better game. The single player game is decent, but short. The multi-player aspect is the focus of this review.

    Most maps are tight and require different strategies than BFBC2. The graphics are great. Due to the smaller map sizes for some of the battles, they don't include destructable buildings. This is the only bad part of the game. But on a tight map, if they did allow destructable buildings, the battlefield could be leveled withn moments of a match starting. Multi-player Maps are limited in number, but still maintain their fun factor because of the "human" element. Negatives include limited leveling and weaponry. The rest is positive. You can hop on anytime you have 15 minutes to spare since the games are shorter than BFBC2. I see this as a positive due to the demands of my life.

    They've perfected the art of forcing you to play to your job in this game.    … Expand
  51. Libra85
    Jan 26, 2011
    8
    I know this game is supposed to be the competition to Call of Duty but it missed the mark. First the game takes a lot of influence from COD which it can come off as a copy cat. But those ideas work very well here. The downside is that it glitches every now and then. Not enough to ruin the fun but enough to notice. And the campaign is way too short. The story is ok but as you progressI know this game is supposed to be the competition to Call of Duty but it missed the mark. First the game takes a lot of influence from COD which it can come off as a copy cat. But those ideas work very well here. The downside is that it glitches every now and then. Not enough to ruin the fun but enough to notice. And the campaign is way too short. The story is ok but as you progress through the game, it just moves until the end. No real build up. Playing the game overall though was very fun and I recommend it.… Expand
  52. Kikolf
    Apr 20, 2011
    9
    Comparando com o BC2 está um pouco abaixo.. Mas este jogo também tem os seus pontos fortes.
    Eu gostei da campanha, acho que estava bem conseguida. Quanto ao online, ao inicio detestei porque estava habituado ao BC2, MAS assim que me adaptei foi o máximo.. Estive sempre nos tres primeiros :)
  53. gameanalytic
    May 4, 2011
    8
    Medal of Honor 2010 is a good game that needs tuning for its next upcoming franchise. First, the campaign is rather short, you can finish it within 6 1/2 hours. And the gameplay for the campaign is somewhat not as fast and fluid as its competitors. The multiplayer component of the game is great. You can easily get matched with other players without a long waiting time. The maps are alsoMedal of Honor 2010 is a good game that needs tuning for its next upcoming franchise. First, the campaign is rather short, you can finish it within 6 1/2 hours. And the gameplay for the campaign is somewhat not as fast and fluid as its competitors. The multiplayer component of the game is great. You can easily get matched with other players without a long waiting time. The maps are also okay. However, with the online pass-- not many people use the maps/and game modes EA offered for additional $9.99. What this means is that it is ideal to make it free so that there will be more players on the maps, rather than paying for something that I see just 2 players.

    The sound in Medal of Honor is great, but the weapon customization has to be improved. There is the need to have more weapons in the campaign mode, and more easy to get ammo from the "opposing forces" while on the campaign.    … Expand
  54. Santi_SOAD96
    May 14, 2011
    10
    As everyone compares every FPS that comes out with black ops, so will I. There are lots of people saying that MOH's campaign is short, but, have you played Black Ops's campaign? MoH has 8 levels (aprox) and Black Ops has 14 levels (aprox), but those 8 levels are far more exciting and fun than Call of Duty's.It may have less levels but they're also longer than Black Ops's campaign.
    MoH uses    As everyone compares every FPS that comes out with black ops, so will I. There are lots of people saying that MOH's campaign is short, but, have you played Black Ops's campaign? MoH has 8 levels (aprox) and Black Ops has 14 levels (aprox), but those 8 levels are far more exciting and fun than Call of Duty's.It may have less levels but they're also longer than Black Ops's campaign.
    MoH uses Frostbite engine (bad company's engine), and Black Ops uses a sightly improved World At War's engine.
    I think that both Moh and Call of Duty have a great sound quality, but the most prominent is MoH's.
    As I havent played the multiplayer yet, I cant say anything about it
    So, to sum all up, i think Moh deserved a much better score than Black Ops (im not saying i dont like black ops), because I think the developers from Moh put a lot more effort into the game than Treyarch (or whoever develops the game) with Black Ops
    I think MoH is a great game, you should give it a try, it won't disapoint you    … Expand
  55. xfamas
    Jul 9, 2011
    9
    This is game has amazing graphics, a movie like story, The campaign is short and easy though. I played it on Hard (the highest difficulty) and died two-three times during the campaign. However the epicness of the story and razor sharp dialogue and voice acting will have you playing again. The weapons sound like real life and have that feel of power. The multi player which is made byThis is game has amazing graphics, a movie like story, The campaign is short and easy though. I played it on Hard (the highest difficulty) and died two-three times during the campaign. However the epicness of the story and razor sharp dialogue and voice acting will have you playing again. The weapons sound like real life and have that feel of power. The multi player which is made by Dice (Masterminds behind the Bad Company 2) is engaging and rewards team play. If you go up like a lone wolf you will die instantly, but have a group of teamates with you and the battlefield becomes and intense place. Overall the game is excellent, aside from the length and the lack of difficulty; the game is awsome. I highly recommend that you go out and buy this game.… Expand
  56. Braders790
    Jun 24, 2012
    8
    The graphics are kinda good for it's time, although not amazing. I hate how it tries to impress you with the really high quality cut scenes when the actually game play is not nearly as good quality. The shouting physics are good, but it's annoying how the snipers are really weak. I know it adds to the realism and that's a good thing but I don't like how you can't tell whether your actuallyThe graphics are kinda good for it's time, although not amazing. I hate how it tries to impress you with the really high quality cut scenes when the actually game play is not nearly as good quality. The shouting physics are good, but it's annoying how the snipers are really weak. I know it adds to the realism and that's a good thing but I don't like how you can't tell whether your actually hitting someone or not, (there are no cross-hairs like in COD). Aside form the negatives, the game play is fun and inciting. And the again the shooting physics are really well done, with a good realistic amount of kick-back and range of the weapons. The trophies available in the game are easy to achieve, but they take a while, which is nice, because most games have really hard to get trophies which makes the platinum seem impossible to acquire. The campaign is better than that in most FPS shooters, it has a great fell to it and it puts you right in the action. The multilayer is is also very fun and easy to get used to. The thing with the classes I don't like but aside form that, it's easy to rack up kills and rank up.

    So there are many good things about the game and not much to go wrong. I rated 8 because I felt would be a bit generous. Well worth the buy, (nowadays you can pick up a copy for like £10) so if you don't own it already then i highly recommend you buy it, Good game.    … Expand
  57. mbrownd
    Jul 15, 2011
    9
    All lovers of first person shooters should have this video game handy. Graphics are fantastic. Online is the best feature of this game (although there are very few maps to choose from). My only concern is with campaign mode: I wish it was a tad bit longer.
  58. Unknown22
    Dec 14, 2011
    8
    I'm a huge fan of battlefield but dice did a great job developing this new moh game. Campaign was amazing, the graphic are amazing, but the online was ok. it doesn't have alot of vehicles. They have the tanks but the tanks weren't as good as battlefield's. Overall this game is pretty good.
  59. Zilcell
    Mar 2, 2012
    9
    Medal of Honor makes things simpler than other recent First Person Shooters. It uses strategy instead of a bunch of dumb random kills. I love the online especially.
  60. coldcalculated
    Dec 11, 2011
    8
    This game is pretty good. Multiplayer is superb, sortof a cross between bad company 2, and modern warfare 2. Not alot of selection in weapons, but the graphics are superb, yet the game needs more maps to play on. Single player was short but alot of fun, with a unique perspective.
  61. Gamemaniac007
    Jun 1, 2012
    10
    I would have giving this game a 10, but i distract 1 point for not finishing the MP. That is Dice's part on this. MOH is a solid MP. It'sq 2012 and I still play it. But no support what so ever by Dice, that is why I give this game a 9/10 for the MP. On the SP ..oh man, THIS game is a masterpiece. Do not compare with COD because this is not like it at all. Realism is taken by the heart. NoI would have giving this game a 10, but i distract 1 point for not finishing the MP. That is Dice's part on this. MOH is a solid MP. It'sq 2012 and I still play it. But no support what so ever by Dice, that is why I give this game a 9/10 for the MP. On the SP ..oh man, THIS game is a masterpiece. Do not compare with COD because this is not like it at all. Realism is taken by the heart. No run and gun here. No 1man army. Sneak and Stealth levels like it should be. Very authentic and everything just fits in the storymode. I give the SP a solid 10/10 . Now my review is a little bit late and can not really wait until MOH Warfighter. Hopefully Danger Close will finish this game properly.… Expand
  62. GameReviews
    Aug 14, 2012
    8
    Medal of Honor is a great shooter, with a solid campaign and an addictive multiplayer. It looks amazing with the Frostbite engine, and the sound design is exactly like Battlefield's style. I will give thanks to EA, for making the terrific campaign, and Dice, for making the great multiplayer. I just wished that multiplayer was more detailed, more strategic. 85 out of 100
  63. Syriamn
    Oct 13, 2012
    8
    This is one of those games which was bashed by negative reviews unfair in my opinion. It has a great single player campaign and a not so great but decent multiplayer. And the Tier 1 campaign gives you another way to replay the campaign. Liked it.
  64. FAM339
    Dec 26, 2012
    9
    In my point of view this game is more for people who have played this series since Medal Of Honor 1,because Medal Of Honor is not so "fancy" as "Call Of Duty" and "Battlefield",but it's a good shooter game,and Medal Of Honor is a classic.
  65. FrostyReviews
    Jan 13, 2013
    8
    I have to look back through my memory bank because I played this a while ago. The campaign was outstanding, I had no idea the ending would happen like it did. It was a really overall fun game. I am so glad I decided to sit down for a few hours and play the entire campaign, because if I wouldn't have, I would have not been able to live with myself. I felt compelled to do the campaign, justI have to look back through my memory bank because I played this a while ago. The campaign was outstanding, I had no idea the ending would happen like it did. It was a really overall fun game. I am so glad I decided to sit down for a few hours and play the entire campaign, because if I wouldn't have, I would have not been able to live with myself. I felt compelled to do the campaign, just like I have with every game I have ever had. The game blew my mind, and I never expected it to be like that. DICE did a really nice job on this game as well as they did with the Battlefield series. Highly recommended.… Expand
  66. EKS666
    Sep 8, 2013
    9
    This game was surprisingly good. I expected just a generic military shooter, but the story was extremely immersive and emotional, the graphics were above expectations, and the gameplay was very intuitive. There are many, many memorable parts of the campaign. The multiplayer is not as sophisticated as call of duty, but is still very fun, and has a good leveling system with improvements toThis game was surprisingly good. I expected just a generic military shooter, but the story was extremely immersive and emotional, the graphics were above expectations, and the gameplay was very intuitive. There are many, many memorable parts of the campaign. The multiplayer is not as sophisticated as call of duty, but is still very fun, and has a good leveling system with improvements to weapons and other tactical advantages. I would recommend this game to any fan of military shooters, or as an introduction to the game genre.… Expand
  67. Chsyphyrus
    Dec 20, 2015
    10
    I really liked the single player mode but the multiplayer mode sucked tiny pathways and also not enough weapons. The game has a lot of details in the graphics the ending was awesome and the characters are lovable
  68. TheSnitchfather
    Sep 9, 2020
    9
    9/10
    I actually liked it, not a lot of weapon options because you mostly play the weapons you start with and there is absolutely no way to change side arms, but the weapons that it did have to offer were still great and the sound effects are once again superior to CoD.
    But it was finally a modern shooter, with not all the overdone Hollywood action bullsh*t that BF and CoD have, not    9/10
    I actually liked it, not a lot of weapon options because you mostly play the weapons you start with and there is absolutely no way to change side arms, but the weapons that it did have to offer were still great and the sound effects are once again superior to CoD.
    But it was finally a modern shooter, with not all the overdone Hollywood action bullsh*t that BF and CoD have, not saying they're bad at all, both have games I absolutely love, but this is a refreshment, you're also not such a bullet-sponge as you are in the other 2 franchises, couple bullets and you drop. Story was decent, but extremely short and i mean EXTREMELY. You could easily play through it in about 2 hours.    … Expand

Awards & Rankings

88
#88 Best PS3 Game of 2010
12
#12 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2010
37
#37 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2010

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 56 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 35 out of 56
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 56
  3. Negative: 0 out of 56
  1. Cynamite
    Jan 16, 2011
    80
    A successful comeback of the Medal of Honor-series, which is far away from reaching the top-ranks of the shooter genre. The short amount of the single-player campaign is really annoying.
    Read full review
  2. Absolute Games
    Jan 15, 2011
    60
    Medal of Honor doesn't become the current image of Electronic Arts – probably the most "humane" of all videogame corporations. Danger Close Games' debut reminds of a time when EA was a gloomy assembly line churning out soulless yearly sequels and movie tie-ins.
    Read full review
  3. Gamereactor Denmark
    Jan 13, 2011
    80
    Medal of Honor is the thinking man's Call of Duty. If you like shooting terrorists but felt the story and campaign of Modern Warfare 2 was too darn stupid, this is the game for you. Mechanically it's close to its competitor, but content-wise it's a class better and more thoughtful. It's an enjoyable if short experience that is bound to leave a lasting impression.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »