Medal of Honor

 PlayStation 3
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 317 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 182 out of 317
  2. Mixed: 107 out of 317
  3. Negative: 28 out of 317
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. kshastry
    Oct 12, 2010
    10
    this is the best first person shooter game. The game is better than call of duty: modern warfare, the single player mode is amazing. The best game of the year, Awesome!!
  2. djknucklez1
    Oct 12, 2010
    10
    MOH blew me away! Great story in campaign mode,a bit short, but it left me wanting even more. The multiplayer follows the Bad Company 2 style but with an arcade feel that really fits perfectly. I'm really glad to see the MOH franchise return. I can't wait for the next installments, which I'm sure will surpass this great title.
  3. Sideburn_Slayer
    Oct 14, 2010
    10
    Medal of honor is epic! Gotta love the US military! Some of the US ranger missions are the best! The Multiplayer is absolutely mind boggling! So much adrenalin! I was sweating when playing! That says something!
  4. JohnPS3
    Oct 13, 2010
    10
    First of all, DONT COMPARE TO CALL OF DUTY. This game is awesome it is alot like battlefield n call of duty only more..... realistic i guess is the word. Its fun and engaging the multiplayer is awesome too if you are a DICE fan theres no way its a zero or u wont like it unless your a idiot or a FANBOY like meatsmuggler i would say this is one of may fav fps of all time n deserves alotFirst of all, DONT COMPARE TO CALL OF DUTY. This game is awesome it is alot like battlefield n call of duty only more..... realistic i guess is the word. Its fun and engaging the multiplayer is awesome too if you are a DICE fan theres no way its a zero or u wont like it unless your a idiot or a FANBOY like meatsmuggler i would say this is one of may fav fps of all time n deserves alot better reviews than what its got i dont think its right to compare to call of duty i saw review it as its own game because thats what it is.The shooting is smooth, the weapons are awesome, the knife sticks are the best, the graphics are great, and multiplayer rocks. The story is good but not the best of course when has a war shooter ever needed a great story. The game is awesome and deserves better.… Expand
  5. vyruzreaper
    Oct 13, 2010
    10
    Great game. The speed is a little too fast but it is MUCH better than MW2 and on par with battlefield. What is going to really make or break this game as the best FPS is the future map packs. If they create decent sized maps then it will be a true winner as the best FPS to date. The sounds are amazing, graphics are on par with most other games and menus are well layed out. Cant wait to getGreat game. The speed is a little too fast but it is MUCH better than MW2 and on par with battlefield. What is going to really make or break this game as the best FPS is the future map packs. If they create decent sized maps then it will be a true winner as the best FPS to date. The sounds are amazing, graphics are on par with most other games and menus are well layed out. Cant wait to get my beard :D… Expand
  6. gameboy786
    Oct 14, 2010
    10
    Medal of honor is the most realistic game ive ever played. The graphics, the game mechanics, and the voice overs is definitely on point. War is not run and gun situations. You squeeze a couple and a couple of bodies drop and move little by little. The situations this game has never been seen in other games. This is definitely not a Modern Warfare copy cat. This game stands on its own 2.Medal of honor is the most realistic game ive ever played. The graphics, the game mechanics, and the voice overs is definitely on point. War is not run and gun situations. You squeeze a couple and a couple of bodies drop and move little by little. The situations this game has never been seen in other games. This is definitely not a Modern Warfare copy cat. This game stands on its own 2. Im very pleased that MOH came back this strong. Keep up the great work you guys are doing over there. Down with COD!!!… Expand
  7. powderrider4105
    Oct 26, 2010
    10
    This game is one of my favorite games in the past year. Not only does it surpass all of the Call Of Duties, it lives up all the other MOH games. People need to realize what war would be like. Its a slower paced, sniper dominated era. NOT walking around with a noobtube or running around with a Knife. I give this game 2 thumbs up and suggest it to anyone, not only the Multiplayer, butThis game is one of my favorite games in the past year. Not only does it surpass all of the Call Of Duties, it lives up all the other MOH games. People need to realize what war would be like. Its a slower paced, sniper dominated era. NOT walking around with a noobtube or running around with a Knife. I give this game 2 thumbs up and suggest it to anyone, not only the Multiplayer, but the story as well… Expand
  8. judgefudge121
    Oct 21, 2010
    10
    there is something fishy going on here. this game should be praised on all levels for the orginality and substance that it brings to the war game scene. nobody likes change, but cmon, call of duty black ops better be brand spanking original or im going to be pissed, you can only ride the same train for so long until you run out of stations. its time to move on, move ahead and move foward,there is something fishy going on here. this game should be praised on all levels for the orginality and substance that it brings to the war game scene. nobody likes change, but cmon, call of duty black ops better be brand spanking original or im going to be pissed, you can only ride the same train for so long until you run out of stations. its time to move on, move ahead and move foward, and the beacon showing us the way spells M.O.H. the singleplayer is not flawless, but no game in the history of game development ever is. There are a few texture pops, but no screen tears or signs that the console cant handle the engine, so all in all it runs smoother than the bonnet of a porsche. gameplay can only be described in one word, flow. i didnt fight my way through the maps i sort of flowed through them on a tidal wave of hail and bullets. there is sometimes so much going on it becomes very easy to die. much like a real war, it can sometimes take one very strategically placed bullet from and an advantaged position and your out of the game. This is the first realistic war game that doesnt bore with realism. Whenever theres a lull in the gameplay your always entertained with the spectacular atmosphere and surroundings. this game is drop dead gorgeous, always a beauty to look at from start to finish. i dont know what the sh!t people are talking about with these reviews. I have made an account just to write this review in hopes that people wont fall for this **** thats been cracking around metacritic and most reviewing sites. those poor buggers at danger close, putting in all this effort to completely rework the war franchise and medal of honour gets put down because lets face it, its medal of honour. I havent been thrilled like this with medal of honour since the days of frontline on the ps2, storming the beaches at normandy on that first level. Do you remember that feeling? that epic feeling? it got better with age.
    multiplayer is not cod. multiplayer is not battlefield 2 bad company. It is the best of both worlds. i sh!t you not, i started playing the multiplayer at around 10 pm, played a few rounds, got lost in the game, looked outside and it was day. this is addicitive be warned. the maps on dm are small and tight, making for some furious gameplay and run-and-gun action, and the conquest style mission mode maps are huge, i say again, by the power of greyskull, why is this game being flamed. do yourself an honour, by this game, it is well worth the money and will keep you more entertained than any other game you currrently have.    … Expand
  9. SifuGun
    Nov 8, 2010
    10
    Moh 2010 is the most precise, accurate, and graphically correct first person shooter ever made to date. And with Black Ops on it's way in one day. I can say after reviewing the B.o. trailers that Moh 2010 will still be the best PURE First Person Shooter out there. I also predict that many will defect from MW2 and BO after they become frustrated with the most important part of the game:Moh 2010 is the most precise, accurate, and graphically correct first person shooter ever made to date. And with Black Ops on it's way in one day. I can say after reviewing the B.o. trailers that Moh 2010 will still be the best PURE First Person Shooter out there. I also predict that many will defect from MW2 and BO after they become frustrated with the most important part of the game: SHOOTING. Much like many people are leaving MW2 to play BBC2 now. Ultimately they will both have their followings but if your serious about shooting MOH 2010 is the way to go. BO might woe you with it's colorful awards and other functions but No one can deny that SHOOTING is the most important part and MOH 2010 excels in this area.… Expand
  10. B-Knock
    Nov 11, 2010
    10
    First off i would like to say EA made the mistake by having two different developers work on the game. Danger close and DICE. The single player campaign is alright and seems rushed on development. The graphics are great, and the story is awesome. The only downfall is the game engine, which makes the game's overall feel a bit out dated. Danger close used the unreal engine, which is the sameFirst off i would like to say EA made the mistake by having two different developers work on the game. Danger close and DICE. The single player campaign is alright and seems rushed on development. The graphics are great, and the story is awesome. The only downfall is the game engine, which makes the game's overall feel a bit out dated. Danger close used the unreal engine, which is the same engine used to make gears of war. The game engine is outdated and they should of used frostbite 1.5 from DICE. The multi-player side of this game is great! very simple and this uses frostbite 1.5 from DICE. This is a perfect combination of Battlefield bad company 2 and modern warfare 2. Its simple leveling system and low selection of guns really keep the game simple. Games usually last 15mins to 5 mins which is great for people who can't sit in front of a tv for 12 hours a day. This game overall is well done but needs more work on the single player side.… Expand
  11. bnekic
    Nov 10, 2010
    10
    I really do enjoy this game, campaign and online multiplayer. If you stop comparing it to Call of Duty and just play it for what it is you'll begin to love it. I just recently bought Black Ops and was really disappointed with the online multiplayer portion so I traded it in and picked up Medal of Honor. I can't believe how horrible Treyarch made the graphics on multiplayer with Black Ops.I really do enjoy this game, campaign and online multiplayer. If you stop comparing it to Call of Duty and just play it for what it is you'll begin to love it. I just recently bought Black Ops and was really disappointed with the online multiplayer portion so I traded it in and picked up Medal of Honor. I can't believe how horrible Treyarch made the graphics on multiplayer with Black Ops. Anyways I do recommend Medal of Honor, great game!… Expand
  12. One_SIC_Ma666ot
    Feb 26, 2012
    10
    The best of the Modern War shooters. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  13. Santi_SOAD96
    May 14, 2011
    10
    As everyone compares every FPS that comes out with black ops, so will I. There are lots of people saying that MOH's campaign is short, but, have you played Black Ops's campaign? MoH has 8 levels (aprox) and Black Ops has 14 levels (aprox), but those 8 levels are far more exciting and fun than Call of Duty's.It may have less levels but they're also longer than Black Ops's campaign.
    MoH uses    As everyone compares every FPS that comes out with black ops, so will I. There are lots of people saying that MOH's campaign is short, but, have you played Black Ops's campaign? MoH has 8 levels (aprox) and Black Ops has 14 levels (aprox), but those 8 levels are far more exciting and fun than Call of Duty's.It may have less levels but they're also longer than Black Ops's campaign.
    MoH uses Frostbite engine (bad company's engine), and Black Ops uses a sightly improved World At War's engine.
    I think that both Moh and Call of Duty have a great sound quality, but the most prominent is MoH's.
    As I havent played the multiplayer yet, I cant say anything about it
    So, to sum all up, i think Moh deserved a much better score than Black Ops (im not saying i dont like black ops), because I think the developers from Moh put a lot more effort into the game than Treyarch (or whoever develops the game) with Black Ops
    I think MoH is a great game, you should give it a try, it won't disapoint you    … Expand
  14. Gamemaniac007
    Jun 1, 2012
    10
    I would have giving this game a 10, but i distract 1 point for not finishing the MP. That is Dice's part on this. MOH is a solid MP. It'sq 2012 and I still play it. But no support what so ever by Dice, that is why I give this game a 9/10 for the MP. On the SP ..oh man, THIS game is a masterpiece. Do not compare with COD because this is not like it at all. Realism is taken by the heart. NoI would have giving this game a 10, but i distract 1 point for not finishing the MP. That is Dice's part on this. MOH is a solid MP. It'sq 2012 and I still play it. But no support what so ever by Dice, that is why I give this game a 9/10 for the MP. On the SP ..oh man, THIS game is a masterpiece. Do not compare with COD because this is not like it at all. Realism is taken by the heart. No run and gun here. No 1man army. Sneak and Stealth levels like it should be. Very authentic and everything just fits in the storymode. I give the SP a solid 10/10 . Now my review is a little bit late and can not really wait until MOH Warfighter. Hopefully Danger Close will finish this game properly.… Expand
  15. Chsyphyrus
    Dec 20, 2015
    10
    I really liked the single player mode but the multiplayer mode sucked tiny pathways and also not enough weapons. The game has a lot of details in the graphics the ending was awesome and the characters are lovable
  16. gamerinside
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    This game it`s good and well balanced, with an amazing story and the multiplayer it`s fun. The single player campaign is better crafted and this time the character-driven narrative takes a backseat to high-action gun fights, and fast-paced interdictions.
  17. dlfootball72
    Oct 12, 2010
    9
    This game deserves a Medal Of Honor for its compelling, rich story that gives respect to the soldier while making the game one of the most authentic compelling modern fps shooter to date. This game will be always compared to Call of Duty since it is taking a shot at the COD franchise and the fps genre it helped to define in the late 1990's. Single player campaign is a blast, whileThis game deserves a Medal Of Honor for its compelling, rich story that gives respect to the soldier while making the game one of the most authentic compelling modern fps shooter to date. This game will be always compared to Call of Duty since it is taking a shot at the COD franchise and the fps genre it helped to define in the late 1990's. Single player campaign is a blast, while Multiplayer leaves you wanting more but its shortcomings are far outweighed by the beautiful vistas and authenticity. If you are on the fence about this game, hit yourself upside the head and go out and buy it, you will not regret your purchase it is one of the finest fps to hit this year.… Expand
  18. SixDelt822
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    This game is a good mix of Battlefield and Call of Duty. The Campaign is good with a good story line but has some minor technical issues. You can tell they spent more time with the multiplayer then they did with the campaign. The multiplayer needs to have a few more game modes and maps which I am sure will come later. If you like modern FPS then you will like this game unless you are aThis game is a good mix of Battlefield and Call of Duty. The Campaign is good with a good story line but has some minor technical issues. You can tell they spent more time with the multiplayer then they did with the campaign. The multiplayer needs to have a few more game modes and maps which I am sure will come later. If you like modern FPS then you will like this game unless you are a Call of Duty fan boy and that's the only game you play.… Expand
  19. pixelgeek
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    Its solid & realistic, too bad that there are too many blind COD fanboys that will smash anyhing that is not COD, I personaly had MW2 & trade it for BBC2, because I like to go for the real thing, not the COD smoke & mirrors arcade/movie feel, If you want the best of both worlds go for MOH, Its got the solid single player that is longer than MW2 & the guys at DICE did a realistic in yourIts solid & realistic, too bad that there are too many blind COD fanboys that will smash anyhing that is not COD, I personaly had MW2 & trade it for BBC2, because I like to go for the real thing, not the COD smoke & mirrors arcade/movie feel, If you want the best of both worlds go for MOH, Its got the solid single player that is longer than MW2 & the guys at DICE did a realistic in your face Multiplayer.… Expand
  20. Vandownbytheriv
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    I don't think the most hardcore gamers would agree with the reviews this game is receiving. And you are definitely not a hardcore gamer if your resume starts with Call of Duty and ends with Battlefield Heroes. There are way too many semi-gamers chiming in on this game that lack any real depth to their gaming experience. This game is exactly what it promised. It is gritty and much moreI don't think the most hardcore gamers would agree with the reviews this game is receiving. And you are definitely not a hardcore gamer if your resume starts with Call of Duty and ends with Battlefield Heroes. There are way too many semi-gamers chiming in on this game that lack any real depth to their gaming experience. This game is exactly what it promised. It is gritty and much more realistic, as realistic as a game can be, it is delivery of this genre. Nothing, that comes to my mind and I have been playing games since the late 70's, comes even close. Call of Duty is an awesome game but lacked the realism you feel with Medal of Honor. The weapons the radio chatter, the environments all make you feel like you are actually there. Now I am not saying that this game is perfect, it does have a few flaws. But they are minor at best. I can say that I am a little slanted in my point of view because I am not a huge multiplayer fan, as you usually end up with a bunch of people who figure out how to cheat and make that part of most gaming a joke. That being said my opinion is based mostly on the single player side of this game, so take my review for what it is worth. But if you enjoy a good solid single player game, go get this one. You not be disappointed.… Expand
  21. 14duke
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    I can't believe all the low scores MOH has received. This is the most fun I have had with a FPS since COD MW. The game looks incredible and the controls are tight. The campaign is a little short; around 7 hours, but it more than makes up for it with a highly compelling and submersive story. The multiplayer is one of the more realistic FPSs out. While playing the multiplayer, I felt likeI can't believe all the low scores MOH has received. This is the most fun I have had with a FPS since COD MW. The game looks incredible and the controls are tight. The campaign is a little short; around 7 hours, but it more than makes up for it with a highly compelling and submersive story. The multiplayer is one of the more realistic FPSs out. While playing the multiplayer, I felt like I was in a real battle without the chance of dying. A lot of people think, that in order to have a great multiplayer, the game must be loaded down with useless stuff like MW2. MOH is a great game and should be played by anyone who is a FPS fan.… Expand
  22. oval
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    This is easily one of the most underrated games of 2010; given that this is basically 2 seperate games in one package i'd like to rate the SP and MP seperately.

    SP, I would give an 9.0; and I won't state any big reasons why other than that its an excellent campaign with only a few minor technical flaws which is why I deduct one point from the score. MP, I would give an 8.0; the    This is easily one of the most underrated games of 2010; given that this is basically 2 seperate games in one package i'd like to rate the SP and MP seperately.

    SP, I would give an 9.0; and I won't state any big reasons why other than that its an excellent campaign with only a few minor technical flaws which is why I deduct one point from the score.

    MP, I would give an 8.0; the reason being is that it has a great foundation but it needs tweaking, also there is not quite enough maps, therefore I deduct 1 point for each flaw.

    While this is definitely not a game for everyone, if you like military games that require you to at least think about what you're doing, you'll enjoy this. I would HIGHLY recommend combat mission and objective raid multiplayer modes over team assault and sector control. The multiplayer is definitely at its best in combat mission, and objective raid is a close second.

    Overall, i'm giving this a user score of 9, simply because I feel that while I would rate the mp 8; it is getting a patch very soon which will fix a lot of the issues; and DICE did listen to some of the user issues for a day 1 patch and added things like muzzle climb and so on, because of this I feel it brings it to an overall 9.    … Expand
  23. ModernUnit
    Oct 13, 2010
    9
    Theres a reason why review sites gave this game average scores. Every review has the words "Modern Warfare 2" and "Call of Duty". For Christs sake, why does Call of Duty have to be a benchmark for every FPS game. Look at MW2 user score on Metacritic, then compare that to Medal of Honor. This game is great. Its a new refreshing feeling from Modern Warfare 2. You dont get OMA-DC noob tubedTheres a reason why review sites gave this game average scores. Every review has the words "Modern Warfare 2" and "Call of Duty". For Christs sake, why does Call of Duty have to be a benchmark for every FPS game. Look at MW2 user score on Metacritic, then compare that to Medal of Honor. This game is great. Its a new refreshing feeling from Modern Warfare 2. You dont get OMA-DC noob tubed and commando knifed from across the map. Medal of Honor is a good game.… Expand
  24. Squanto
    Oct 14, 2010
    9
    I just don't see why people give such low scores... Is it because they are COD fans? whatever .... I think this is like Uncharted2 meets COD MW2 ... It looks good and smooth and plays well ... the story grabs you So hey this is more of the same ... isn't each shooter more of the same?
    But the measure of realism has notched up some levels I think ... Just give it a chance ... and form your    I just don't see why people give such low scores... Is it because they are COD fans? whatever .... I think this is like Uncharted2 meets COD MW2 ... It looks good and smooth and plays well ... the story grabs you So hey this is more of the same ... isn't each shooter more of the same?
    But the measure of realism has notched up some levels I think ... Just give it a chance ... and form your own opinion ....
    Just enjoy it!    … Expand
  25. Dark-Cat
    Oct 14, 2010
    9
    Despite this is my first review, I've played a lot of other games before, so I know what I'm saying.

    MOH deserved a 9. Singleplayer was better than anything I've played in a while, the events and locations were all closely linked to reality. (I'm a military fan myself.) It might not be the most realistic game you've ever played if you have ever played the ARMA series, but it's close    Despite this is my first review, I've played a lot of other games before, so I know what I'm saying.

    MOH deserved a 9. Singleplayer was better than anything I've played in a while, the events and locations were all closely linked to reality. (I'm a military fan myself.) It might not be the most realistic game you've ever played if you have ever played the ARMA series, but it's close enough. Since Danger Close have to impress the casual players as well, but they still manage to do a good job on that as well. did an amazing job on that. Though they should have also done MP as well.

    Multiplayer, on the other hand, was more like DICE was trying to make a MW2 ver. of BC2. But what it redeemed itself back on was the multiplayer maps and gameplay. The multiplayer uses fog to blind snipers from shooting a long range kill, making the game having less snipers, Also the gameplay and map was pretty well designed, forcing Team Cooperation without having one of the teammates to say so. If you run into a decent game, you'll find out most of your teammates are sticking together most of the time. Overall, this is a game definitely worth purchasing. It just lost 1 score the singleplayer story length and the multiplayer's lack of vehicles. But this game can take over MW2's place in your heart if you just give it a try, and you'll definitely be glad you did, even if you didn't like it in the end.    … Expand
  26. lkchan1114
    Oct 14, 2010
    9
    MoH takes you to the real battle zone! Enjoyed the story. Graphics could have been a little more refined, but a satisfying game overall. I'm looking forward to the sequel.
  27. himynameissudip
    Oct 14, 2010
    9
    if you can look past the glaring lack of polish, this reboot can really be a value. while it doesn't add much new to game play, everything done is solid, minus the polish. the story is minimum but powerful for what it is. very authentic and emotionally powerful at the end. the campaign is varied but a tad short. however, its shooting mechanics are not cutting edge. the multi player hasif you can look past the glaring lack of polish, this reboot can really be a value. while it doesn't add much new to game play, everything done is solid, minus the polish. the story is minimum but powerful for what it is. very authentic and emotionally powerful at the end. the campaign is varied but a tad short. however, its shooting mechanics are not cutting edge. the multi player has technical flaws but delivers a solid experience. if you're the kind of person that doesn't wince at glitches, with an interest in a authentic story, this might be the shooter for you.… Expand
  28. ghoststrykre
    Oct 15, 2010
    9
    First off, MOH has several bugs. Lighting can be odd at times and then suddenly fix itself, there is texture pop in at the beginning of levels in the campaign (lasts for about 3 seconds), and then there is an odd feeling to the running controls (if the left thumbstick is slightly pushed up and right, you might suddenly start strafing sideways rather than running diagonally). You'll findFirst off, MOH has several bugs. Lighting can be odd at times and then suddenly fix itself, there is texture pop in at the beginning of levels in the campaign (lasts for about 3 seconds), and then there is an odd feeling to the running controls (if the left thumbstick is slightly pushed up and right, you might suddenly start strafing sideways rather than running diagonally). You'll find most of your movement really needing to be controlled heavily by the right thumbstick in ways that many other games don't do. It's very difficult to describe, but just understand that its there.
    Now, the campaign starts off rough. To me the graphics and explosions looked okay. It certainly looked like the graphics were behind the curve of things, and sometimes even looked awful. Then it was as if I started a new level and all of my issues were gone. Suddenly the lighting in the game was incredible, and at times I found myself marvelling at how realistic characters looked due to the lighting and textures. I used to live in the Middle East for a short period of time and let me tell you, some of the background scenery (not the villages, those can seem a bit generic) were downright real looking. It truly is fun to stop for a second just to look at the marvelous visuals this game can have.
    Some transitions in scenes, or from running on foot to being in a vehicle, can be rough. Other times its smooth as butter. For all the effort EA put into immersion, I can't figure out why it is that when you turn on night vision you don't see the character reach to pull down his goggles/IR sensor. Just a thought.
    **Important** Modern Warfare 2 thrived on close quarters combat, surprises around every corner, and adrenaline in every button pressed. Here, Medal of Honor presents firefights that are medium to long range shooting. This is MORE realistic because honestly, special forces troops are stupid enough to blunder into enemies in close quarter combat 24/7 like they are portrayed to do in MW2. I found the gameplay mesmerizing and I am still loving it.
    Voice Acting = Incredible. MW2 had some decent voice acting, but the sound and voice acting in MOH blows it out of the water.
    Summary: Campaign = lots of fun, but unfortunately a lot of bugs.
    Multiplayer is still establishing itself with the community, but is largely fun. Even when getting dominated the game can still be fun. When someone gets a load of killstreaks back to back, ehhh, the game isn't as much fun. For the most part the multiplayer is a blast and with friends can be incredible. Unlock system seems like it should be a tad more in depth though, and soldier management should be more developed. Gameplay is awesome though.

    Long story short, this is a game with bugs that will almost definitely be fixed in the next MOH, but none of these bugs come close to ruining the fun experience of this game. Certain elements of scripted moments in the campaign may turn people off, but that was NOT the case for me. Rent this first and see if you like it, then buy it because I honestly am getting my moneys worth out of this game right now.    … Expand
  29. j-dog007
    Oct 16, 2010
    9
    Most realistic shooter ever made, campaign mode is a little short but the tier 1 & online make up for it giving you a lot of things to do & people to kill.
  30. Saint
    Oct 17, 2010
    9
    Medal of Honor was a game I had low expectations for, I was wrong. It was a lot of fun, albit a little easy on normal by which I was able to go through with just the pistol and the knife and beat the game, still a hoot for me and my friend. The single player was great fun even if it was very short. The only reason I do not give a 10 out of 10 to this fine game is because of theMedal of Honor was a game I had low expectations for, I was wrong. It was a lot of fun, albit a little easy on normal by which I was able to go through with just the pistol and the knife and beat the game, still a hoot for me and my friend. The single player was great fun even if it was very short. The only reason I do not give a 10 out of 10 to this fine game is because of the Multiplayer, It is quite literally a sniper rifle fest, I had trouble with many maps because of that. I found even when we played our little game here in a realistic state and not as if we were playing gears of war we were still pretty much out gunned by sniper rifle spam and tali-ban that some how obtained weapons that they have a near 0% chance of accessing anyway.… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

88
#88 Best PS3 Game of 2010
12
#12 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2010
37
#37 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2010

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 56 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 35 out of 56
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 56
  3. Negative: 0 out of 56
  1. Cynamite
    Jan 16, 2011
    80
    A successful comeback of the Medal of Honor-series, which is far away from reaching the top-ranks of the shooter genre. The short amount of the single-player campaign is really annoying.
    Read full review
  2. Absolute Games
    Jan 15, 2011
    60
    Medal of Honor doesn't become the current image of Electronic Arts – probably the most "humane" of all videogame corporations. Danger Close Games' debut reminds of a time when EA was a gloomy assembly line churning out soulless yearly sequels and movie tie-ins.
    Read full review
  3. Gamereactor Denmark
    Jan 13, 2011
    80
    Medal of Honor is the thinking man's Call of Duty. If you like shooting terrorists but felt the story and campaign of Modern Warfare 2 was too darn stupid, this is the game for you. Mechanically it's close to its competitor, but content-wise it's a class better and more thoughtful. It's an enjoyable if short experience that is bound to leave a lasting impression.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »