User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 267 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 195 out of 267
-
Mixed: 60 out of 267
-
Negative: 12 out of 267
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Dec 17, 2012
-
AndyR.Jul 15, 2008
-
-
MattM.Aug 30, 2008
-
-
Jan 31, 2011The AI for your allies in the campaign is terrible. They are like pets that follow you around and do nothing. The game is still fun since it seems to be balanced around you doing all of the work.
-
Aug 12, 2014Really disappointing and unmemorable campaign that focuses far too much on "bro" humour and vulgar language. Multiplayer is fun, with destructible environments being the highlight, but not worth it overall.
-
Sep 2, 2019This game is totally awesome!!!! Graphics, Story, Cut scenes and Game play are great.
-
Nov 25, 2020There's a lot to like here. The destructible buildings and usage of vehicles are pure mayhem. The main storyline about outcast soldiers trying to get rich is a lot of fun. Unfortunately the last few missions are a slog to get through, and detracts from the overall fun of the gameplay.
-
IainF.Oct 20, 2008
-
-
RobB.Jul 12, 2008All the elements are there, they're just assembled so badly. I can only assume the term "Bad Company" referrs to Dice! This game is like a poor version of BF2:MC; wooden handling, poor graphics, poor hit detection, awful lagging servers, poor vehicle controls, yep all the elements are there! But then what do you expect when a whole game is built arround a single "gimmic"?
-
-
ThomasS.Jul 7, 2008Disappointing. Bullet relay, overall very odd hitboxes, unrealistic hitboxes and unbelievable senarios which leave you wondering "how the hell did he survive that?"
-
-
DanAug 10, 2008Game is ok, but the online gaming is shocking and only getting worse. Ea really needs to sort this out and quick before people go back to call of duty.
-
-
MichaelF.Jul 23, 2008I like the online gaming. I even like it better than COD4 due to the fact that people cannot just throw grenades the whole time or crap a grenade when you kill them. The thing that bothers me about this game is the mic. goes dead and even the game play sound goes dead online. But overall not a bad game.
-
-
thetruthJul 25, 2008I do like the fact that when you kill an enemy, if you die they will spawn to life again, which gives you hope when you face incredibly frustrating part. I have to say that it bothers me that I cant sneak up on most of my enemies since they see me, miles away. There are hordes and hordes of enemies. Graphics are a typical war shooter for the ps3, which then again isn't all that bad.
-
-
Oct 21, 2012Good singleplayer and good multiplayer although rather difficult. Nice empathy with the game's characters. And that's all. Played it and liked it. End of story.
Awards & Rankings
-
The extreme polish evident in the final product makes it all worthwhile. Both single- and multiplayer shine - at long last redeeming DICE for the crappy bot-fests offline players had to endure in previous games in the series. [July 2008, p.82]
-
It may lack the finesse in the single-player that some similar titles have, but it does a great job of making you feel the part as you roll into combat with guns blazing, your squad hooting and bellowing behind you. Add to this the multiplayer which is well rounded and realistic, yet big on the fun, and you have a great experience which could ultimately have you playing for months and months.
-
In spite of its sluggish opening, Battlefield: Bad Company goes on to produce one of the most entertaining first-person shooters since last year’s "Call of Duty 4."