- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Mar 30, 2011The game is thirty minutes long and costs ten dollars. That's thirty three cents a minute to play this game. You'll get better value out of a psychic hotline.
-
Mar 23, 2011The game lacks variety, but it also doesn't outstay its welcome. If you want some laughs and don't mind that the shooting experience is average at best, playing through this alien invasion is probably more entertaining than the movie and you'll get some Achievements/Trophies out of it.
-
Apr 25, 2011A PSN game based on the new movie. This game is a first person shooter and the only thing you have to do is kill every alien that comes on your path. The graphical style is unique and nice, but the rest of the game isn't great. It's repetitive and boring and the audio is bad.
-
Jun 18, 2011Although the looks of Battle: Los Angeles are acceptable, the length of the game is not. The price doesn't justify the quality of the game and you'll find yourself longing for a good game even before you reach the end of this incredibly mediocre game, that doesn't even last two hours.
-
Mar 25, 2011I realise first person shooters are getting shorter these days, but, come on. Did Saber Interactive really imagine that releasing a movie tie-in that you can sleepwalk through inside an hour was going to be acceptable?
-
Apr 4, 2011Easy, short, linear and with embarrasing flaws in AI, this game is a huge disappointment.
-
Playstation Official Magazine UKMay 17, 2011A pitiful tie-in to a sub-standard movie. [June 2011, p.111]
-
Apr 5, 2011A by-the-numbers shooter that fails to take advantage of its license.
-
Mar 23, 2011Like poking a dead bluebird with a stick. For a few seconds you're fascinated by the grotesque, then you walk away, disgusted.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 1 out of 9
-
Mixed: 3 out of 9
-
Negative: 5 out of 9
-
Apr 6, 2012
-
Aug 23, 2023