Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
The replayability is very poor as it is already boring the first time you go through it. Levels are very predictable and the action is weak... It's simply just not worth your time.
-
A classic adventure that doesn't try to innovate yet still manages to deliver the goods.
-
A mix of intense head-bashing against smart A.I. and an occasional crate-smashing balance out to some solid gameplay.
-
Indy has a game that is worthy of his name in terms of gameplay and style, but definitely not technically on the Playstation 2.
-
GMR MagazineThe textures aren't quite as sharp [as the Xbox version] and the framerate is a little dodgy, but Indy controls slightly better on the PS2 controller, thanks to the additional shoulder buttons. [Sept 2003, p.69]
-
Official U.S. Playstation MagazineThe framerate here bogs down so much that it actually hampers gameplay. And there's no excuse for that - Emperor's Tomb isn't doing anything PS2 can't handle. [Aug 2003, p.98]
-
Play MagazineMost disappointing, the drab use of color and flat architecture design show a basic lack of aesthetic awareness. [Aug 2003, p.77]
-
Some people (myself included) just cant stand games with graphics as choppy and visually butchered as this one.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 18 out of 24
-
Mixed: 4 out of 24
-
Negative: 2 out of 24
-
Jun 15, 2021This game's great. I remembered playing it recently and gave it another go... It's the best game ever made.
-
Oct 2, 2015
-
SamMay 17, 2006