- Publisher: Bandai
- Release Date: Feb 10, 2003
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
I had to muddle through almost half of this 20-hour RPG before .hack really grabbed me... And now, I'm hooked. [Feb 2003, p.100]
-
A simple, repetitive experience that's over fairly quickly for an RPG, and its story doesn't go anywhere at all. Nevertheless, it's pretty fun while it lasts, and anime fans probably won't be able to resist it.
-
A game so fresh and unique, it just begs to be experienced despite its flaws. [Feb 2003, p.138]
-
If you can forgive it for some plain visuals and don't mind wading through menus - it may be fast-paced, but it's still an RPG - it's worth your time. [Mar 2003, p.58]
-
The main bulk of the gameplay, which mainly consists of battles in fairly unattractive dungeons is clichéd, and highly repetitive. The graphics as a whole fall a little below average, and for a standalone game, its fairly short.
-
Ugly. It's got a muddled battle system. [Feb 2003, p.44]
-
games(TM)That it makes no bones about the fact that you're in a game doesn't make it less of an experience - indeed, it's one of the few things that saves Infection from being a run-of-the-mill RPG. [Mar 2004, p.104]
-
Edge MagazineIt gains points for plot and the audacity of simulating an online world, and could have scored higher, but its simplicity and inflexible save system drag it down. [Apr 2004, p.108]
-
By being forced to set-up a premise that MIGHT evolve into something interesting in the long haul, ".hack's" storyline drags and plays second-fiddle to average-at-best (and done better elsewhere), random-dungeon clearing RPG fodder.
-
There is no doubt that Bandai has a really, really interesting concept here, but its just so unfortunate that things like the camera system and inexcusably repetitive dungeons lower the games status to just another mediocre RPG with tons of potential just waiting to be noticed and explored.
-
The most disturbing thing about .Hack is how short it is. Perhaps the whole series, or at least two of the games, could have easily fit on one disc.
-
Its all rather tiresome and disappointing in a release that promised something different. But what remains is a bog standard RPG, dressed up as something else but flattering to deceive.
Awards & Rankings
|
84
|
|
|
42
|
#42 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2003
|
|
43
|
#43 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2003
|
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 58 out of 73
-
Mixed: 9 out of 73
-
Negative: 6 out of 73
-
Apr 14, 2020Played on PlayStation 2.
Gameplay: GREAT.
Story: GOOD.
Graphic: GOOD.
Music/Sound: GREAT.
Dialogue: GOOD. -
Apr 11, 2017
-
Oct 6, 2015