- Publisher: Atari
- Release Date: Dec 4, 2003
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 121 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 88 out of 121
-
Mixed: 22 out of 121
-
Negative: 11 out of 121
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Jul 11, 2011If it wasn't by the weird and not right board, maybe it hit the 8 score. It gets to irritating moving little by little every time, is very desperate and gets tired. I applaud the visuals looks nice and gives a fresh feeling to the adventure.
-
Jun 22, 2015In my opinion this game is better then the first one. I know dargonworld is kinda stupid. But it had the boo saga which Budokai 1 didn't had. It also has more Characters and better Gameplay. But the Graphics even for 2004 it looks weird and strange also how i already mentiont the story mode sucks
-
TysonB.Feb 12, 2004Better than the first Dragonball z Budokai. I still very happy that this still is the best in the series.
-
-
DragonKnightofFinalFantasyNov 28, 2004Ugghhh is this Budokai 2 or Budokai 1.6? I say 1.6 because it does have some new stuff most of it is new characters,the new graphics, and the new Dragon Board which is crap it should've stuck with the Story mode give us the Majin Buu saga or somthing. Geez this is a good game if you haven't played Budokai 1 but otherwise just but Budokai 3.
-
-
Aug 29, 2013
-
May 19, 2019
-
Apr 17, 2020This is the first Dragon Ball game that i played and it was funny and entertaining, with some changes from the anime like Buu absorbing Freezer or Cell.
Awards & Rankings
|
31
|
#31 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2003
|
-
Its uninspired controls, lack of character diversity, and the absence of a story mode make this only a marginally entertaining video game.
-
Worlds above what the first game was, with the greatly improved graphics (beautiful Cel-Shaded graphics)and game modes.
-
Play MagazineTakes the shallow one-on-one fighting action of its predecessor and repackages it with essentially no noteworthy enhancements to the fighting engine or visuals... Disappointing. [Dec 2003, p.82]