- Publisher: VU Games
- Release Date: Aug 26, 2003
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
This no-nonsense beat-'em-up based adventure will be fairly meaningless to non-believers but it's a tasty treat for Buffy fans. [PSM2]
-
Ugly graphics keep this from scoring higher, and yes we realize graphics aren't everything... Buffy fans should be pleased though I think VU Games can do just a bit better.
-
GMR MagazinePacked with gameplay depth, replay value, mordant humor, and vampire killing - the four basic food groups of the videogame diet. [Oct 2003, p.70]
-
Electronic Gaming MonthlyLike a mediocre Buffy episode: Decent plot, predictable Scooby-gang hijinks, and lots of fighting action and bad vampire puns... It also throws in...the iffy graphics engine that produces lifeless character movement and collision issues. [Oct 2003, p.134]
-
Official U.S. Playstation MagazineYou can't save until you beat a level. Having to conquer a tough boss before being able to save any progress at all will irritate anyone with a social life. [Oct 2003, p.119]
-
At best an average game that will appeal to fans of the series more than it will to newcomers.
-
This game goes out of its way to appeal to fans of the show, who should love the story, and will really appreciate the unlockable interviews with the cast and crew. They may not notice the problems with the game design, but will surely notice the game is missing the rapid-fire pacing of the show in both its action and story segments.
-
The fact that we actually did play it through to completion - despite the sort of flaws that have sent us flying off the handle in countless other reviews - is a testament to its continued accessibility and the continuing attraction of the Buffy franchise.
-
It's simply not as good as the first Buffy game and suffers from loose control and repetitive gameplay. I guess hot chicks and vampires don't automatically make things awesome.
Awards & Rankings
|
98
|
|
|
68
|
#68 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2003
|
|
70
|
#70 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2003
|
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 40 out of 53
-
Mixed: 10 out of 53
-
Negative: 3 out of 53
-
Jul 25, 2021
-
Aug 23, 2011
-
AndrewJ.Jan 31, 2004This game was quite good, but after a few hours of gameplay, it seemed to become somewhat repetive. I doubt the replay value would be high.