Tooth and Tail

 PC
User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 45 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 33 out of 45
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 45
  3. Negative: 4 out of 45

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Tabbou
    Aug 21, 2022
    6
    Idée bien originale, avec des dialogues et des factions sympa, une histoire bien ficelée, gameplay qui change des jeux RTS classiques
    Mais il manque des **** quelques chose, la mini map est pas claire, certaines missions trop dirigistes (si on n'adopte pas la stratégie que le jeu a choisit on ne peux pas gagner) et le jeu n'utilise pas le curseur de la souri, pour un RTS sur PC c'est bête...
  2. ChosenUndead99
    Apr 29, 2018
    8
    A great RTS game where you play as one of four animal factions that are fighting in a civil war. You control the leader and build farms and dens to create various units to take out the enemy.
  3. Mandulum
    Dec 20, 2017
    5
    Five Word Review: Crippled by Procedural and simplicity.
    Favorite Thing: *shrug*
    Least Favorite Thing: Procedural maps. They don't work. Map layout vastly affects difficulty.

    Date Completed: 2017-12-17
    Playtime: ~ 10h
    Enjoyment: 5/10
    Recommendation: I didn't much like it. Lots of others apparently did.
  4. Wranxy
    Nov 3, 2017
    7
    First of all, i was so hyped about this game, because i find out PWatch games when the summer sale in Steam, I bought Monaco and play 79 hours. I was love in that game, We're 4 friends and playing this game for so much time. I just want to see other PWatch games, and i saw they started to develop Tooth and Tail. Developement phase is taked 3,4 years, I waited 4 years with so hype. IFirst of all, i was so hyped about this game, because i find out PWatch games when the summer sale in Steam, I bought Monaco and play 79 hours. I was love in that game, We're 4 friends and playing this game for so much time. I just want to see other PWatch games, and i saw they started to develop Tooth and Tail. Developement phase is taked 3,4 years, I waited 4 years with so hype. I pre-ordered game and i played 5 hours when the game releses, and i can say i'm dissapointed a little bit. The combat system is just making game terriable. They we're talking about a long good story but, its so bad. But otherways this game is awsome. If i wasnt that hyped my score will be 8 or 9 but 4 years isn't worth for waiting this game...… Expand
  5. smasherwolf
    Oct 23, 2017
    10
    This is an accessible RTS, perfect for those who are just getting into the genre but that doesn't mean it lacks depth, as matches can get intensely strategical and quick decision-making and even micro-ing units are factors that will lead to victory. Alongside an awesome art style and soundtrack, charm (some of these units are just wonderfully designed) and a pretty lengthy single playerThis is an accessible RTS, perfect for those who are just getting into the genre but that doesn't mean it lacks depth, as matches can get intensely strategical and quick decision-making and even micro-ing units are factors that will lead to victory. Alongside an awesome art style and soundtrack, charm (some of these units are just wonderfully designed) and a pretty lengthy single player campaign, Tooth and Tail is the most refreshing game I have played in quite some time.… Expand
  6. ussrocker
    Sep 19, 2017
    10
    The most well crafted, fast paced, aesthetically pleasing RTS I've played in years, full of charm, flavor and care. Please, please buy this game, you wont regret it.
  7. kitto
    Sep 15, 2017
    10
    Quirky simplistic RTS with great strategic depth, sometimes can be hard as nails. Procedurally generated maps in single player campaign can be a bit frustrating, but generally is more of a plus. Visuals and music are just great. Highly recommend.
  8. michaelrediger
    Sep 13, 2017
    10
    This game is very fun. I've played all sorts of RTS games. Starcraft, Battle for Middle earth, Age of empires, Rise of nations, Dawn of war, Age of mythology, ect... This game is actually a little different because you control a "hero" that builds stuff and directs your armies but it is really simple to learn (only like 5 buttons total) but it is actually really complex and in depth. It'sThis game is very fun. I've played all sorts of RTS games. Starcraft, Battle for Middle earth, Age of empires, Rise of nations, Dawn of war, Age of mythology, ect... This game is actually a little different because you control a "hero" that builds stuff and directs your armies but it is really simple to learn (only like 5 buttons total) but it is actually really complex and in depth. It's also fast paced, the games only last like 5-15 minutes usually. There is single player, online non-ranked, and online ranked.… Expand
  9. ussrocker
    Sep 19, 2017
    10
    The most well crafted, fast paced, aesthetically pleasing RTS I've played in years, full of charm, flavor and care. Please, please buy this game, you wont regret it.

Awards & Rankings

77
#77 Best PC Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
80

Generally favorable reviews - based on 17 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 17
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 17
  3. Negative: 0 out of 17
  1. Games.cz
    Feb 18, 2018
    70
    A fast-paced strategy without the complicated management requests your attention with good theme and the original view at a class struggle. Belligerent rats, pigs and other vermin haven´t been so funny and addictive for a long time.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Feb 16, 2018
    80
    Extremely clever and fast RTS with animals killing each other while shouting revolutionary slogans. It sounds weird, it looks weird, but it plays great. [Issue#282]
  3. CD-Action
    Dec 19, 2017
    70
    Don’t be fooled by pixel graphics. Despite its simple mechanics TaT is a full-blooded RTS game with a varied, challenging campaign. [12/2017, p.61]
See all critic reviews »