Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

 PC
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1890 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,197 out of 1890
  2. Mixed: 300 out of 1890
  3. Negative: 393 out of 1890
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. trinovatic
    Nov 27, 2022
    7
    Me gusto mucho, muy buenas tardeadas y noches con los reales, es un shooter que me encanta aunque sea una basura jugándolo xdddd.
  2. Korisana
    Dec 4, 2015
    6
    R6 Siege, as a tactical multiplayer game, is actually pretty fun. However, the distinct lack of weapon customizations as well as lack of maps make this a somewhat lackluster game. Add in the fact this game does not have the single player campaign the Rainbow Six series is known and lauded for, and you come out with a fun game but one that is not worth it's current price point. I recommendR6 Siege, as a tactical multiplayer game, is actually pretty fun. However, the distinct lack of weapon customizations as well as lack of maps make this a somewhat lackluster game. Add in the fact this game does not have the single player campaign the Rainbow Six series is known and lauded for, and you come out with a fun game but one that is not worth it's current price point. I recommend holding off until you can get this at a price point under $40.… Expand
  3. Meshuggener
    Jan 1, 2016
    6
    Descent game but NO SQUAD in single player!!! i paid full price for this game.This game is not bad
    but because of that it's not worth more than 30 bucks in my opinion.I prefer COD, Battlefield etc for Multiplayer.
  4. Hackerbee
    Mar 13, 2018
    6
    Man has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but itMan has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but it is probably one of the single best multiplayer fps games ever made now, it looses points due to Ubisoft botching the launch and taking 2 years to get their **** together with this game, and 2 more points for launching without anticheat back in the day. but it is a great game now and @ 20$ for the starter edition well worth your money if you like team based fps games.

    Old review from when the game first came out:

    This game gets a 2 for only after a year getting a real anticheat (Battle eye), and for the incredible destructibility that the environments in the game offer. albeit to late to make this game what it could have been.
    The game has way to much interp, and has a very real problem with people exploiting the **** netcode and ping advantage afforded by this.
    This game had the potential to have over throne CSGO as the big competitive shooter, but languished in Ubisofts incompetent hands, game breaking bug after game breaking bug fixed and then introduced by Ubisoft, and day one issues that continue to plague this game to this day. most glaring of which is the **** netcode, and broken matchmaker that can leave you sitting in queue for upwards of 40 mins, in some cases in ranked. it completely kills the momentum of the game, but that is not even what really killed this game, no its death came early right at launch when this game was left with no anticheat what so ever for at least 3 months before "Fairfight" came, and even then it was highly ineffectual to the point that the game became unplayable due to the amount of rampaging wallhackers in the community. only after the introduction of Battleeye did the game really show its true potential, while still being hamstrung by **** netcode and broken matchmaker. This game is a prime example of how a big name Developer can absolutely destroy a great idea.    … Expand
  5. Dobian
    Apr 11, 2016
    6
    Way back in 1998 I bought this game called Rainbow Six at CostCo. It looked pretty cool, but when I loaded it up the first time I was blown away. The ability to plan missions and manage a team, set waypoints and go codes and rules of engagement. I was in heaven, and spent hours drawing up the perfect plan to rescue a hostage or diffuse a bomb.

    I would go on to play Rogue Spear and Raven    Way back in 1998 I bought this game called Rainbow Six at CostCo. It looked pretty cool, but when I loaded it up the first time I was blown away. The ability to plan missions and manage a team, set waypoints and go codes and rules of engagement. I was in heaven, and spent hours drawing up the perfect plan to rescue a hostage or diffuse a bomb.

    I would go on to play Rogue Spear and Raven Shield and the series just got better. Then it started to go downhill, with future iterations like Lockdown lacking the depth and quality of their predecessors. So along comes Siege and on one level it not only meets but exceeds the game mechanics of previous Rainbow Six titles in a big way. But on another level it falls way short, simply because UbiSoft's emphasis is on drawing in the multiplayer crowd (i.e., young console gamers). So there is no single player campaign, you have no bots to manage, no planning phase. There is minimal support for co-op. You can't control mission parameters like the time limit, number of enemies, map, mission type, number of rounds. You simply get a random map with a random mission type for whatever your chosen difficulty is. There is also no map editor so you must make do with the official maps provided. So on the whole, the game has very little content for gamers who are interested in the core RS experience established in games like Raven Shield and Rogue Spear. Rainbow Six has always had multiplayer pvp, but the heart of the series has always been tactical cooperative mission planning and execution.

    The gameplay itself is great. There are many large and well-designed maps. The graphics and animations are terrific. The shooting mechanics are fine, and the characters you can unlock have a lot of neat tricks they can do, from breaching charges to emp grenades. Using the destructible environments to create new sight lines or entrances is great fun. The drone is cool and very useful. The downside of the situation missions and terrorist hunts is they sometimes take the "waves of enemies" approach that is more CoD than tactical shooter. And the inclusion of suicide bombers in every mission that are more Jason Vorhees than a human enemy is kind of ridiculous. Still, the action is a lot of fun.

    Another negative for me is the whole cash-grab aspect of this game, with a rewards system that encourages multiplayer players to spend even more money on top of this game's already steep price tag of sixty bucks to get important upgrades quicker. And charging money for things like weapon skins that should have been opened up to the modding community like other games (e.g., Skyrim) do.

    Siege is a good game for what it is, but for me it's not a fully Rainbow Six game, it's more a game for the CoD crowd, just like the new Tomb Raiders are not fully Tomb Raider games, but are more for the Uncharted crowd. Without any real support for single player or co-op, the game ultimately lacks staying power since playing options will diminish as the online community shrinks over time. I expect Siege will end up on a dusty shelf or uninstalled on Steam for most players by the end of the year.    … Expand
  6. Dmitry_B
    Apr 23, 2019
    6
    Rainbow Six Siege is a perfect example of project, which was realeased very poorly, after that patched up to normal state, but contiuesly be killed by micro-transaction system, which in at some soments becomed pay-to-win. Only progresion in this game is to grind in-game valute to purchase skins, same as in overwatch, but above that, you need to gring/pay real money to buy operators, whichRainbow Six Siege is a perfect example of project, which was realeased very poorly, after that patched up to normal state, but contiuesly be killed by micro-transaction system, which in at some soments becomed pay-to-win. Only progresion in this game is to grind in-game valute to purchase skins, same as in overwatch, but above that, you need to gring/pay real money to buy operators, which have masive impact on gameplay. This is main reason why entry in cybersport arena of this game is too complicated, and thi is why it will be never on same spotlight as Counter Strike: Global Offensive. All this is going this garbage tehnical state, which sometimes will give you so much anger, that you will delete this game after 10 seconds.… Expand
  7. Statutory
    Sep 27, 2021
    6
    Finally a good solid cooperative fps game. It must have teamwork. Not just run and shoot like almost every fps games in the recently market. The graphics are ok. Great optimization on PC. The sound is astounding and a very important key to victory. Anyway, I am enjoying so much this game, not because it's perfect, it is not. But like I said, the fps market was having a lack of games likeFinally a good solid cooperative fps game. It must have teamwork. Not just run and shoot like almost every fps games in the recently market. The graphics are ok. Great optimization on PC. The sound is astounding and a very important key to victory. Anyway, I am enjoying so much this game, not because it's perfect, it is not. But like I said, the fps market was having a lack of games like this.

    2021 Edit: Yeah, I gave a 10 to this game back in 2015. But after a lot of DLCs that has nothing to do with the original core of the game, which was something more realistic and serious, it just got meh. Looks like the new operators came from a Disney's agent movie or something (I love Disney) and it looks more like a Fortnite for young adults game nowadays.    … Expand
  8. Tenchu13
    Dec 2, 2015
    6
    It does what it says it will, but only that. The game while excellent, doesn't deserve a full price tagit is only a single multiplayer mode, which would be one of many in other full price games. at 2/3 to 1/2 of its asking price it would be an instant buy. There is also no single player.
  9. rustyfeeder
    Dec 3, 2015
    6
    Would not recommend buying this game. It's team focused so you won't be getting max fun when playing alone. Apart from that it may be difficult to find a match. Overall this game does not worth the price tag.
  10. meno0_
    Dec 1, 2015
    6
    The game's good. But definitely not worth your $60 right now. Issues include laggy servers; buggy netcode; limbs poking through walls (leading to stupid deaths with many cheating accusations); not receiving any renown (credits used to unlock characters) or XP after matches; the annoying (standard now) ubisoft payment plan, $60 for an incomplete game, then charge for credits to buy extraThe game's good. But definitely not worth your $60 right now. Issues include laggy servers; buggy netcode; limbs poking through walls (leading to stupid deaths with many cheating accusations); not receiving any renown (credits used to unlock characters) or XP after matches; the annoying (standard now) ubisoft payment plan, $60 for an incomplete game, then charge for credits to buy extra items and boosters to help unlock characters or items. There are so many little and large issues that I can't recommend anyone to buy it at the moment. It's a REALLY fun game, when it works. But it's really infuriating with some of the issues that the developers failed to iron out after the closed, or open beta stages of development.

    Also, f**k ubisoft. You get around 300 renown/match, and you usually don't even get any XP or Renown from matches, due to a really annoying bug, and the ops (characters) start at 500, going up in increments of 500 up to around 2500 (I think.) It takes absolutely forever to unlock all 20 ops at this rate.

    Anyways, the gameplay is great. If they fixed the netcode, and the annoying little bugs, I'm sure it could be a contender for CS:GO.    … Expand
  11. objectivelytrue
    Dec 10, 2015
    6
    Pros - Destroying elements of the map feels fresh and entertaining, unlocking operators extends the games playability.

    Cons - In the past three weeks of release and beta, I've heard one person over 25. The rest are your typical obnoxious 13-19 human garbage straight out of Dota 2. 5v5 - console limitations or irritating e-sports **** you decide, provides no flexibility in game    Pros - Destroying elements of the map feels fresh and entertaining, unlocking operators extends the games playability.

    Cons - In the past three weeks of release and beta, I've heard one person over 25. The rest are your typical obnoxious 13-19 human garbage straight out of Dota 2. 5v5 - console limitations or irritating e-sports **** you decide, provides no flexibility in game experience. Loading -> The matches are short and every match has a loading period before and after, as well as a one minute setup phase that gets old very quickly. Latency is extremely high, I frequently cannot edge around corners and shoot someone reliably because I don't receive a server packet until i've already been shot.

    A short lived multiplayer game, priced way beyond it's worth, with your typical competitive douchebag community. I wouldn't recommend it.    … Expand
  12. Star_Wolf
    Jul 11, 2016
    6
    I had really big hopes for this game. Rainbow Six: Siege is just another moneymaker for Ubisoft. Don't get me wrong, RS6 is a very solid and good game, but the whole Operatives thing is just destroying it! I wanted to see character and load-out customisation like in RS: Vegas 2, but better. I wanted to see a tactical experience like in SWAT4 or previous RS games, but with total destructionI had really big hopes for this game. Rainbow Six: Siege is just another moneymaker for Ubisoft. Don't get me wrong, RS6 is a very solid and good game, but the whole Operatives thing is just destroying it! I wanted to see character and load-out customisation like in RS: Vegas 2, but better. I wanted to see a tactical experience like in SWAT4 or previous RS games, but with total destruction (pfft, even indi game DUE PROCESS did better in ALPHA). I'm upset. Played it for 10 hours and forgot about even buying it… Expand
  13. REEDDLES
    Nov 30, 2020
    6
    В siege за первых 4 года наиграл 1000+ часов, за 5 год только 80-100 из за того, что удалили часть карт из ранкеда, надоело играл за 5 картах так как половина из тех что осталась просто улетает во время бана карт. Друзья совсем забросили игру, говорят пока старые карты не вернут и +5 новых не добавят они не вернуться. Из 10-12 друзеи которые год назад играли ставильно остался 1 и тотВ siege за первых 4 года наиграл 1000+ часов, за 5 год только 80-100 из за того, что удалили часть карт из ранкеда, надоело играл за 5 картах так как половина из тех что осталась просто улетает во время бана карт. Друзья совсем забросили игру, говорят пока старые карты не вернут и +5 новых не добавят они не вернуться. Из 10-12 друзеи которые год назад играли ставильно остался 1 и тот заходит потестить новыи патч. Бесит, что удалают дальние прицелы, лутше бы разброс немного увиличивали имбовым стволам. Звук в игре просто отвратительный, у меня звукавуха creative ae-9 и наушники hyperx alpha s и временами не слышу врага за углом в 2-3 метрах когда он бежит ко мне и много ещо других пробем со звуком.… Expand
  14. kingog
    Dec 2, 2016
    6
    The Game is okay, but this Dlc´s System not, Season Pass 2 ?!?!?! wtf is going on, i paid for an game that has 2 game modes (Locker-Ranked)an F2P has more Modes than this, and now they will bring season pass 2 ?! i thought they will make the GAME BIGGER, with Team- Deathmatch etc...... but one mode for an paid game is poor.....
  15. Mjr_REAPER
    Dec 18, 2016
    6
    The game is ok, unfortunately, is not as good as the previous views. By focusing on the multiplayer game I have the impression that the game looks like CS. The main problems with the game that cause discomfort while playing this: server lags, high ping, bugs, lack of cooperation with other players unless you play with your friends, there may be problems with the optimization model damageThe game is ok, unfortunately, is not as good as the previous views. By focusing on the multiplayer game I have the impression that the game looks like CS. The main problems with the game that cause discomfort while playing this: server lags, high ping, bugs, lack of cooperation with other players unless you play with your friends, there may be problems with the optimization model damage floors and ceilings is very limited, the system DLC gives to be desired a lot of things every year new season pass Ubisoft seriously. Although the DLC is free, we can use the currency in the game to unlock new operators, however, the price of each operator is set so that the player took x hours forcing it to buy season pass that guarantees instant access to operators.… Expand
  16. Flipmails
    Apr 10, 2017
    6
    NOTE: THIS REVIEW ONLY APPLIES FOR THE CASUAL MULTIPLAYER MODE. I HAVE NOT EXPERINCED THE ENTIRETY OF THE GAME SO TAKE THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.

    In short it is a good competitive fps with a high amount of depth (at least compared to most modern FPS games) crippled by sudden high pings, rubberbanding and random instances where the game freezes. The level design is pretty damn good,    NOTE: THIS REVIEW ONLY APPLIES FOR THE CASUAL MULTIPLAYER MODE. I HAVE NOT EXPERINCED THE ENTIRETY OF THE GAME SO TAKE THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.

    In short it is a good competitive fps with a high amount of depth (at least compared to most modern FPS games) crippled by sudden high pings, rubberbanding and random instances where the game freezes.

    The level design is pretty damn good, with blind spots usually containing breakeable walls/windows that disencourage enemies from camping. At the same time, because deaths come so fast, rushing through the map in an attempt to achieve the highest possible body count is also a terrible idea.

    Another interasting feature present in the game are the cameras and drones. The cameras allow the defending team to spot enemies and mark their location on the map, which helps to alleviate the lack of minimap, something that wouldn't fit what this game is trying to do anyway. Meanwhile, the drones give the attackers a safe way to see if there are any enemies ahead without exposing themselves to danger.

    Teamworking is also an important part of the game but that also has its fair share of problems. For starters, at least in the casual mode, there is no punishment for quiting in the middle of a match, usually resulting in numeric disadvantage that can end up in a round loss that could otherwise be reasonable avoided. A 20 minute ban for quiting would have been a simple and efficient solution since players that had something urgent to do would not be overly punished for leaving the game, while the ones who exited just because they felt like it would be forced to sit in the corner doing nothing for almost half an hour. Balancing is also another issue as it is not uncommon to have a level 20 player in the same team as a guy that has played the game for 200 hours.

    Had the the balancing and quiting being the only problems present in this product I would not have given it such a mediocre score, so let's get to the bigger factors preventing this from being a great video game.

    Now, I wouldn't mind microtransactions if they were only applied to cosmetics but that is obviously not the case. There are 28 unlockable operators in this game and their price varies from 12500 to 25000 points, which means that if you are not willing to put extra money into the game you will have to play for at least 700 hours in the best case scenario. And keep in mind that the only operator that can be selected by more than 1 player is the recruit, who also happens to be the most useless class in the game. So if you want to have a good time with your buddies who just bought the game you may as well just go play something else. Even for a $15 dollar game I find this absolutely outrageous.

    However, what kills the game for me are technical issues that I don't seem to have any control over. For some god forsaken reason I will suddenly go backwards 5 meters while I am reading to the objective, or maybe the game will freeze for about 3 seconds even though my ping is at 80. Speaking of ping, what is up with the random connection spikes? I swear to god the game sometimes jumps from 60 to 3000 for no apparent reason.

    All in all Rainbow Six SIege is refreshing FPS that rewards thought, planning and strategy more than quick reflexes and good aim. Unfortunately said game is hindered by technical issues and an abusive microtransaction system. Oh, I almost forgot, it also requires the installation of Uplay.    … Expand
  17. User28190895
    Apr 24, 2018
    6
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six® Siege isn't without its fair share of problems, infact it has alot of problems as far as I can tell. It mixes the two in a somewhat great brew that, with enough polish, can only become better and better if they keep getting their cards right.
  18. ememong
    Feb 17, 2019
    6
    Прекрасная задумка, великолепная атмосфера, проработка сюжетов каждого из оперативников, а также уникальный интерфейс, который не режет глаз и вводит в состояние экстаза... Что? Я описал игру вашей мечты, да? Но не спешите ее покупать, ведь есть маленькая деталь в этом прекрасном блюде, это ее соус, который называется UBISOFT.
    Всё как обычно, отличная задумка, ужасная реализация.
    Эта    Прекрасная задумка, великолепная атмосфера, проработка сюжетов каждого из оперативников, а также уникальный интерфейс, который не режет глаз и вводит в состояние экстаза... Что? Я описал игру вашей мечты, да? Но не спешите ее покупать, ведь есть маленькая деталь в этом прекрасном блюде, это ее соус, который называется UBISOFT.
    Всё как обычно, отличная задумка, ужасная реализация.
    Эта прекрасная солянка приправлена уксусом, в виде огромного количества багов, постоянных вылетов серверов, плохой оптимизации и многого другого. Просто невозможно понять, как могут быть настолько разносторонние баги. Если ошибки механик (которых очень много, и они действительно мешают играть) еще допустимы (хоть и не в таком количестве), то такие баги, как снятие очков рейтинга за победу или пропажа вещей после открытия лутбокса, это необъяснимо. Да я даже за некоторых оперативников не могу играть теперь, например за Blitz, это опер. с щитом, которого я люблю всем сердцем, но мне пришлось его отпустить, потому что его щит теперь пропускает пули, опять же из-за багов.
    Ладно бы данные ошибки фиксили, но нет, лучше выпускать новых оперативников, новые карты, которые несут еще больше багов!
    Аналогов данной игры я найти не могу, поэтому и до сих пор в нее играю, и искренне надеюсь, что UBISOFT когда-нибудь да возьмутся за голову, а пока, очень плохо.    … Expand
  19. Ammonium
    Feb 9, 2021
    6
    To start off the game itself is not bad and has a high learning curve i think that it's even way too much for new players.

    But the Community destroys the game really hard i never encountered this much toxicity in a game. Not even in 20 years of playing CS. You get as a low lvl player often just Team killed. Be a girl? Be ready to get Team killed from your mates and Teabagged and    To start off the game itself is not bad and has a high learning curve i think that it's even way too much for new players.

    But the Community destroys the game really hard i never encountered this much toxicity in a game.
    Not even in 20 years of playing CS.

    You get as a low lvl player often just Team killed.
    Be a girl? Be ready to get Team killed from your mates and Teabagged and listen to all sorts of ****
    People that just grief the entire match.
    Good example join a match there is a 4stack then be prepared to get reported and team killed and that they throw the match.

    Like i said the game itself is not bad but the community destroys the fun of it completely.    … Expand
  20. TheCraftingZomb
    Jun 22, 2019
    6
    Rainbow Six Siege is a game as described by its cover. It does not appeal to me that much but it does have a lot of pros. The game has very good graphics and does stuff like leaning left or right just like anybody would do. The characters are well designed and some are very unique and stand out among the rest. The music and levels are definitely down graded from the previous games.Rainbow Six Siege is a game as described by its cover. It does not appeal to me that much but it does have a lot of pros. The game has very good graphics and does stuff like leaning left or right just like anybody would do. The characters are well designed and some are very unique and stand out among the rest. The music and levels are definitely down graded from the previous games. Unlocking characters and gaining exp will take a very long time and will probably get boring after a while.… Expand
  21. hspreg
    Jan 9, 2020
    6
    The game itself as a tactical shooter is the best in nowdays. But the view model... I got killed many times by this **** mechanisim. I stay in cover , I cannot see the enemy, but the half off my body exposed and get killed. And of course hitreg... I shoot well, but when I see an enemy face to face, I mostly die. I have 180ms reaction time average and 30ms ping. Does not matter... IThe game itself as a tactical shooter is the best in nowdays. But the view model... I got killed many times by this **** mechanisim. I stay in cover , I cannot see the enemy, but the half off my body exposed and get killed. And of course hitreg... I shoot well, but when I see an enemy face to face, I mostly die. I have 180ms reaction time average and 30ms ping. Does not matter... I maximized my personal skills in thousands of hours, like map knowledge, accuracy, response time, but the game mechanics don't let me develop further. So confusing...… Expand
  22. Sanghelic
    May 23, 2020
    6
    personalmente se me hizo aburrido, es muy tactico lo cual lo hace bastante divertio, sobre todo para jugar con amigos, pero no es mi tipo de juego, sobre todo porque no me gustan los juegos que tienen un meta muy muy establecido y tiene ya 20000 personajes que desbloquear (o comprar) cuando tu apenas tienes 1
  23. pur__0_0__
    Mar 22, 2021
    6
    After having played so many Call of Duty games, CS:GO and Team Fortress 2, this game feels like a step back, especially when you play it with a controller in which case the aiming is almost impossible. It feels like it has really clunky controls. The aiming is very hard with players like Clash and Montagne. We cannot pick up the weapons dropped by dead enemies (this made sense in TeamAfter having played so many Call of Duty games, CS:GO and Team Fortress 2, this game feels like a step back, especially when you play it with a controller in which case the aiming is almost impossible. It feels like it has really clunky controls. The aiming is very hard with players like Clash and Montagne. We cannot pick up the weapons dropped by dead enemies (this made sense in Team Fortress 2 and Overwatch since they are class-based characters but there's no reason here). There are a lot of smurf accounts that abuse us for not playing on their level (even though we are in the Newcomers level), and there is no way to report such players.

    In terms of visual appeal this game is great. There are also a large number of maps to choose from, which makes this game look like it had a lot more potential. There are also plenty of characters to choose from. Though it lacks a campaign mode, it makes up for it with Challenges (which are also very difficult for new players). So overall I'd say it's a gorgeous looking game ruined by its bad controls and community.    … Expand
  24. tommydlbass
    Aug 16, 2020
    6
    Good game that turned into **** by the community and the p2w characters that are much better and useful than the "free" ones. I love the strategy that this game offers but I don't understand why the kill a team mate is activated and why the community is so toxic. Don't buy this game.
  25. pan1ni
    Jul 20, 2020
    6
    I have a love relationship with this game even though i love its core gameplay the balencing is often broken and hit reg and glitches are comon, hackers have been a recent big problem and balancing maps and operators usaly takes way too long if i where you i would rather put your time in competive shooters that are functioning to be fair
  26. Virr
    Dec 15, 2020
    6
    Игра хороша, НО... Звук просто ужасен. для шутера позиционирование звука крайне важно. тут - это какой-то рендом. очень плохая оптимизация. Конечно, можно сделать скидку на старый движок, но игра обновлялась (а последний патч вообще перекачал клиент полностью)... баги анимация, читеры, рандом... всё здесь.
    может быть неплохим вариантом для группы из 5 человек - чтоб погореть или    Игра хороша, НО... Звук просто ужасен. для шутера позиционирование звука крайне важно. тут - это какой-то рендом. очень плохая оптимизация. Конечно, можно сделать скидку на старый движок, но игра обновлялась (а последний патч вообще перекачал клиент полностью)... баги анимация, читеры, рандом... всё здесь.
    может быть неплохим вариантом для группы из 5 человек - чтоб погореть или посмеяться в компании.

    6/10 от меня

    The game is good, BUT ... The sound is terrible. for a shooter, sound positioning is extremely important. here - it's some kind of random. very bad optimization. Of course, you can make a discount on the old engine, but the game was updated (and the last patch was completely full client re-download) ... animation bugs, cheaters, random ... everything is here.
    can be a good option for a group of 5 people - to get burned or laugh in the company.

    6/10 from me    … Expand
  27. Asandberg
    Feb 28, 2021
    6
    It's a first person shooter, like csgo but its actually innovative and requires some brain usage to play. But the lack of content and repetitiveness makes it a boring game.
  28. Kakafria
    Nov 22, 2021
    6
    ╭───────────╮
    ┃_____● ══__⊙°°    ┃
    ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃█ UBISOFT FIX IT!!    █┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃                ╭───────────╮
    ┃_____● ══__⊙°°    ┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃█ UBISOFT FIX IT!!    █┃
    ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃
    ┃           
  29. DonldTrump_45Th
    Jan 26, 2023
    6
    Hello, this is a default review because i'm forced to use 75 characters. I'll edit this review in the future talking about the game, don't worry ;)

    Used to be a great game
    My final rate is: 6
  30. AgentLvi
    Dec 27, 2022
    6
    not bad game, but not good either. The multiplayer is really miss & match, visual is decent, and the voice is also decent
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PC Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
16
#16 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 37
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 37
  3. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 3, 2016
    86
    An excellent and innovative breath of fresh air. The more I play, the more I like. I hope this is new role model for shooters to come. [Jan 2016]
  2. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    70
    Siege’s multiplayer mode with its hectic pace and unpredictability seems to have a huge e-sport potential but with random teammates is often unplayable. [01/2016, p.52]
  3. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Jan 20, 2016
    80
    Unfortunately, there aren’t that many maps available, but each one of them has lots of details and alternate routes, like basements and balconies. Even the airplane is much more complex than the archetypical “long tube with seats.” [Issue#205, p.48]
See all critic reviews »