Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

 PC
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1890 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,197 out of 1890
  2. Mixed: 300 out of 1890
  3. Negative: 393 out of 1890
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. trinovatic
    Nov 27, 2022
    7
    Me gusto mucho, muy buenas tardeadas y noches con los reales, es un shooter que me encanta aunque sea una basura jugándolo xdddd.
  2. Korisana
    Dec 4, 2015
    6
    R6 Siege, as a tactical multiplayer game, is actually pretty fun. However, the distinct lack of weapon customizations as well as lack of maps make this a somewhat lackluster game. Add in the fact this game does not have the single player campaign the Rainbow Six series is known and lauded for, and you come out with a fun game but one that is not worth it's current price point. I recommendR6 Siege, as a tactical multiplayer game, is actually pretty fun. However, the distinct lack of weapon customizations as well as lack of maps make this a somewhat lackluster game. Add in the fact this game does not have the single player campaign the Rainbow Six series is known and lauded for, and you come out with a fun game but one that is not worth it's current price point. I recommend holding off until you can get this at a price point under $40.… Expand
  3. Meshuggener
    Jan 1, 2016
    6
    Descent game but NO SQUAD in single player!!! i paid full price for this game.This game is not bad
    but because of that it's not worth more than 30 bucks in my opinion.I prefer COD, Battlefield etc for Multiplayer.
  4. Hackerbee
    Mar 13, 2018
    6
    Man has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but itMan has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but it is probably one of the single best multiplayer fps games ever made now, it looses points due to Ubisoft botching the launch and taking 2 years to get their **** together with this game, and 2 more points for launching without anticheat back in the day. but it is a great game now and @ 20$ for the starter edition well worth your money if you like team based fps games.

    Old review from when the game first came out:

    This game gets a 2 for only after a year getting a real anticheat (Battle eye), and for the incredible destructibility that the environments in the game offer. albeit to late to make this game what it could have been.
    The game has way to much interp, and has a very real problem with people exploiting the **** netcode and ping advantage afforded by this.
    This game had the potential to have over throne CSGO as the big competitive shooter, but languished in Ubisofts incompetent hands, game breaking bug after game breaking bug fixed and then introduced by Ubisoft, and day one issues that continue to plague this game to this day. most glaring of which is the **** netcode, and broken matchmaker that can leave you sitting in queue for upwards of 40 mins, in some cases in ranked. it completely kills the momentum of the game, but that is not even what really killed this game, no its death came early right at launch when this game was left with no anticheat what so ever for at least 3 months before "Fairfight" came, and even then it was highly ineffectual to the point that the game became unplayable due to the amount of rampaging wallhackers in the community. only after the introduction of Battleeye did the game really show its true potential, while still being hamstrung by **** netcode and broken matchmaker. This game is a prime example of how a big name Developer can absolutely destroy a great idea.    … Expand
  5. Dobian
    Apr 11, 2016
    6
    Way back in 1998 I bought this game called Rainbow Six at CostCo. It looked pretty cool, but when I loaded it up the first time I was blown away. The ability to plan missions and manage a team, set waypoints and go codes and rules of engagement. I was in heaven, and spent hours drawing up the perfect plan to rescue a hostage or diffuse a bomb.

    I would go on to play Rogue Spear and Raven    Way back in 1998 I bought this game called Rainbow Six at CostCo. It looked pretty cool, but when I loaded it up the first time I was blown away. The ability to plan missions and manage a team, set waypoints and go codes and rules of engagement. I was in heaven, and spent hours drawing up the perfect plan to rescue a hostage or diffuse a bomb.

    I would go on to play Rogue Spear and Raven Shield and the series just got better. Then it started to go downhill, with future iterations like Lockdown lacking the depth and quality of their predecessors. So along comes Siege and on one level it not only meets but exceeds the game mechanics of previous Rainbow Six titles in a big way. But on another level it falls way short, simply because UbiSoft's emphasis is on drawing in the multiplayer crowd (i.e., young console gamers). So there is no single player campaign, you have no bots to manage, no planning phase. There is minimal support for co-op. You can't control mission parameters like the time limit, number of enemies, map, mission type, number of rounds. You simply get a random map with a random mission type for whatever your chosen difficulty is. There is also no map editor so you must make do with the official maps provided. So on the whole, the game has very little content for gamers who are interested in the core RS experience established in games like Raven Shield and Rogue Spear. Rainbow Six has always had multiplayer pvp, but the heart of the series has always been tactical cooperative mission planning and execution.

    The gameplay itself is great. There are many large and well-designed maps. The graphics and animations are terrific. The shooting mechanics are fine, and the characters you can unlock have a lot of neat tricks they can do, from breaching charges to emp grenades. Using the destructible environments to create new sight lines or entrances is great fun. The drone is cool and very useful. The downside of the situation missions and terrorist hunts is they sometimes take the "waves of enemies" approach that is more CoD than tactical shooter. And the inclusion of suicide bombers in every mission that are more Jason Vorhees than a human enemy is kind of ridiculous. Still, the action is a lot of fun.

    Another negative for me is the whole cash-grab aspect of this game, with a rewards system that encourages multiplayer players to spend even more money on top of this game's already steep price tag of sixty bucks to get important upgrades quicker. And charging money for things like weapon skins that should have been opened up to the modding community like other games (e.g., Skyrim) do.

    Siege is a good game for what it is, but for me it's not a fully Rainbow Six game, it's more a game for the CoD crowd, just like the new Tomb Raiders are not fully Tomb Raider games, but are more for the Uncharted crowd. Without any real support for single player or co-op, the game ultimately lacks staying power since playing options will diminish as the online community shrinks over time. I expect Siege will end up on a dusty shelf or uninstalled on Steam for most players by the end of the year.    … Expand
  6. Dmitry_B
    Apr 23, 2019
    6
    Rainbow Six Siege is a perfect example of project, which was realeased very poorly, after that patched up to normal state, but contiuesly be killed by micro-transaction system, which in at some soments becomed pay-to-win. Only progresion in this game is to grind in-game valute to purchase skins, same as in overwatch, but above that, you need to gring/pay real money to buy operators, whichRainbow Six Siege is a perfect example of project, which was realeased very poorly, after that patched up to normal state, but contiuesly be killed by micro-transaction system, which in at some soments becomed pay-to-win. Only progresion in this game is to grind in-game valute to purchase skins, same as in overwatch, but above that, you need to gring/pay real money to buy operators, which have masive impact on gameplay. This is main reason why entry in cybersport arena of this game is too complicated, and thi is why it will be never on same spotlight as Counter Strike: Global Offensive. All this is going this garbage tehnical state, which sometimes will give you so much anger, that you will delete this game after 10 seconds.… Expand
  7. Statutory
    Sep 27, 2021
    6
    Finally a good solid cooperative fps game. It must have teamwork. Not just run and shoot like almost every fps games in the recently market. The graphics are ok. Great optimization on PC. The sound is astounding and a very important key to victory. Anyway, I am enjoying so much this game, not because it's perfect, it is not. But like I said, the fps market was having a lack of games likeFinally a good solid cooperative fps game. It must have teamwork. Not just run and shoot like almost every fps games in the recently market. The graphics are ok. Great optimization on PC. The sound is astounding and a very important key to victory. Anyway, I am enjoying so much this game, not because it's perfect, it is not. But like I said, the fps market was having a lack of games like this.

    2021 Edit: Yeah, I gave a 10 to this game back in 2015. But after a lot of DLCs that has nothing to do with the original core of the game, which was something more realistic and serious, it just got meh. Looks like the new operators came from a Disney's agent movie or something (I love Disney) and it looks more like a Fortnite for young adults game nowadays.    … Expand
  8. Tenchu13
    Dec 2, 2015
    6
    It does what it says it will, but only that. The game while excellent, doesn't deserve a full price tagit is only a single multiplayer mode, which would be one of many in other full price games. at 2/3 to 1/2 of its asking price it would be an instant buy. There is also no single player.
  9. rustyfeeder
    Dec 3, 2015
    6
    Would not recommend buying this game. It's team focused so you won't be getting max fun when playing alone. Apart from that it may be difficult to find a match. Overall this game does not worth the price tag.
  10. meno0_
    Dec 1, 2015
    6
    The game's good. But definitely not worth your $60 right now. Issues include laggy servers; buggy netcode; limbs poking through walls (leading to stupid deaths with many cheating accusations); not receiving any renown (credits used to unlock characters) or XP after matches; the annoying (standard now) ubisoft payment plan, $60 for an incomplete game, then charge for credits to buy extraThe game's good. But definitely not worth your $60 right now. Issues include laggy servers; buggy netcode; limbs poking through walls (leading to stupid deaths with many cheating accusations); not receiving any renown (credits used to unlock characters) or XP after matches; the annoying (standard now) ubisoft payment plan, $60 for an incomplete game, then charge for credits to buy extra items and boosters to help unlock characters or items. There are so many little and large issues that I can't recommend anyone to buy it at the moment. It's a REALLY fun game, when it works. But it's really infuriating with some of the issues that the developers failed to iron out after the closed, or open beta stages of development.

    Also, f**k ubisoft. You get around 300 renown/match, and you usually don't even get any XP or Renown from matches, due to a really annoying bug, and the ops (characters) start at 500, going up in increments of 500 up to around 2500 (I think.) It takes absolutely forever to unlock all 20 ops at this rate.

    Anyways, the gameplay is great. If they fixed the netcode, and the annoying little bugs, I'm sure it could be a contender for CS:GO.    … Expand
  11. objectivelytrue
    Dec 10, 2015
    6
    Pros - Destroying elements of the map feels fresh and entertaining, unlocking operators extends the games playability.

    Cons - In the past three weeks of release and beta, I've heard one person over 25. The rest are your typical obnoxious 13-19 human garbage straight out of Dota 2. 5v5 - console limitations or irritating e-sports **** you decide, provides no flexibility in game    Pros - Destroying elements of the map feels fresh and entertaining, unlocking operators extends the games playability.

    Cons - In the past three weeks of release and beta, I've heard one person over 25. The rest are your typical obnoxious 13-19 human garbage straight out of Dota 2. 5v5 - console limitations or irritating e-sports **** you decide, provides no flexibility in game experience. Loading -> The matches are short and every match has a loading period before and after, as well as a one minute setup phase that gets old very quickly. Latency is extremely high, I frequently cannot edge around corners and shoot someone reliably because I don't receive a server packet until i've already been shot.

    A short lived multiplayer game, priced way beyond it's worth, with your typical competitive douchebag community. I wouldn't recommend it.    … Expand
  12. Star_Wolf
    Jul 11, 2016
    6
    I had really big hopes for this game. Rainbow Six: Siege is just another moneymaker for Ubisoft. Don't get me wrong, RS6 is a very solid and good game, but the whole Operatives thing is just destroying it! I wanted to see character and load-out customisation like in RS: Vegas 2, but better. I wanted to see a tactical experience like in SWAT4 or previous RS games, but with total destructionI had really big hopes for this game. Rainbow Six: Siege is just another moneymaker for Ubisoft. Don't get me wrong, RS6 is a very solid and good game, but the whole Operatives thing is just destroying it! I wanted to see character and load-out customisation like in RS: Vegas 2, but better. I wanted to see a tactical experience like in SWAT4 or previous RS games, but with total destruction (pfft, even indi game DUE PROCESS did better in ALPHA). I'm upset. Played it for 10 hours and forgot about even buying it… Expand
  13. REEDDLES
    Nov 30, 2020
    6
    В siege за первых 4 года наиграл 1000+ часов, за 5 год только 80-100 из за того, что удалили часть карт из ранкеда, надоело играл за 5 картах так как половина из тех что осталась просто улетает во время бана карт. Друзья совсем забросили игру, говорят пока старые карты не вернут и +5 новых не добавят они не вернуться. Из 10-12 друзеи которые год назад играли ставильно остался 1 и тотВ siege за первых 4 года наиграл 1000+ часов, за 5 год только 80-100 из за того, что удалили часть карт из ранкеда, надоело играл за 5 картах так как половина из тех что осталась просто улетает во время бана карт. Друзья совсем забросили игру, говорят пока старые карты не вернут и +5 новых не добавят они не вернуться. Из 10-12 друзеи которые год назад играли ставильно остался 1 и тот заходит потестить новыи патч. Бесит, что удалают дальние прицелы, лутше бы разброс немного увиличивали имбовым стволам. Звук в игре просто отвратительный, у меня звукавуха creative ae-9 и наушники hyperx alpha s и временами не слышу врага за углом в 2-3 метрах когда он бежит ко мне и много ещо других пробем со звуком.… Expand
  14. kingog
    Dec 2, 2016
    6
    The Game is okay, but this Dlc´s System not, Season Pass 2 ?!?!?! wtf is going on, i paid for an game that has 2 game modes (Locker-Ranked)an F2P has more Modes than this, and now they will bring season pass 2 ?! i thought they will make the GAME BIGGER, with Team- Deathmatch etc...... but one mode for an paid game is poor.....
  15. Mjr_REAPER
    Dec 18, 2016
    6
    The game is ok, unfortunately, is not as good as the previous views. By focusing on the multiplayer game I have the impression that the game looks like CS. The main problems with the game that cause discomfort while playing this: server lags, high ping, bugs, lack of cooperation with other players unless you play with your friends, there may be problems with the optimization model damageThe game is ok, unfortunately, is not as good as the previous views. By focusing on the multiplayer game I have the impression that the game looks like CS. The main problems with the game that cause discomfort while playing this: server lags, high ping, bugs, lack of cooperation with other players unless you play with your friends, there may be problems with the optimization model damage floors and ceilings is very limited, the system DLC gives to be desired a lot of things every year new season pass Ubisoft seriously. Although the DLC is free, we can use the currency in the game to unlock new operators, however, the price of each operator is set so that the player took x hours forcing it to buy season pass that guarantees instant access to operators.… Expand
  16. Flipmails
    Apr 10, 2017
    6
    NOTE: THIS REVIEW ONLY APPLIES FOR THE CASUAL MULTIPLAYER MODE. I HAVE NOT EXPERINCED THE ENTIRETY OF THE GAME SO TAKE THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.

    In short it is a good competitive fps with a high amount of depth (at least compared to most modern FPS games) crippled by sudden high pings, rubberbanding and random instances where the game freezes. The level design is pretty damn good,    NOTE: THIS REVIEW ONLY APPLIES FOR THE CASUAL MULTIPLAYER MODE. I HAVE NOT EXPERINCED THE ENTIRETY OF THE GAME SO TAKE THIS WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.

    In short it is a good competitive fps with a high amount of depth (at least compared to most modern FPS games) crippled by sudden high pings, rubberbanding and random instances where the game freezes.

    The level design is pretty damn good, with blind spots usually containing breakeable walls/windows that disencourage enemies from camping. At the same time, because deaths come so fast, rushing through the map in an attempt to achieve the highest possible body count is also a terrible idea.

    Another interasting feature present in the game are the cameras and drones. The cameras allow the defending team to spot enemies and mark their location on the map, which helps to alleviate the lack of minimap, something that wouldn't fit what this game is trying to do anyway. Meanwhile, the drones give the attackers a safe way to see if there are any enemies ahead without exposing themselves to danger.

    Teamworking is also an important part of the game but that also has its fair share of problems. For starters, at least in the casual mode, there is no punishment for quiting in the middle of a match, usually resulting in numeric disadvantage that can end up in a round loss that could otherwise be reasonable avoided. A 20 minute ban for quiting would have been a simple and efficient solution since players that had something urgent to do would not be overly punished for leaving the game, while the ones who exited just because they felt like it would be forced to sit in the corner doing nothing for almost half an hour. Balancing is also another issue as it is not uncommon to have a level 20 player in the same team as a guy that has played the game for 200 hours.

    Had the the balancing and quiting being the only problems present in this product I would not have given it such a mediocre score, so let's get to the bigger factors preventing this from being a great video game.

    Now, I wouldn't mind microtransactions if they were only applied to cosmetics but that is obviously not the case. There are 28 unlockable operators in this game and their price varies from 12500 to 25000 points, which means that if you are not willing to put extra money into the game you will have to play for at least 700 hours in the best case scenario. And keep in mind that the only operator that can be selected by more than 1 player is the recruit, who also happens to be the most useless class in the game. So if you want to have a good time with your buddies who just bought the game you may as well just go play something else. Even for a $15 dollar game I find this absolutely outrageous.

    However, what kills the game for me are technical issues that I don't seem to have any control over. For some god forsaken reason I will suddenly go backwards 5 meters while I am reading to the objective, or maybe the game will freeze for about 3 seconds even though my ping is at 80. Speaking of ping, what is up with the random connection spikes? I swear to god the game sometimes jumps from 60 to 3000 for no apparent reason.

    All in all Rainbow Six SIege is refreshing FPS that rewards thought, planning and strategy more than quick reflexes and good aim. Unfortunately said game is hindered by technical issues and an abusive microtransaction system. Oh, I almost forgot, it also requires the installation of Uplay.    … Expand
  17. User28190895
    Apr 24, 2018
    6
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six® Siege isn't without its fair share of problems, infact it has alot of problems as far as I can tell. It mixes the two in a somewhat great brew that, with enough polish, can only become better and better if they keep getting their cards right.
  18. ememong
    Feb 17, 2019
    6
    Прекрасная задумка, великолепная атмосфера, проработка сюжетов каждого из оперативников, а также уникальный интерфейс, который не режет глаз и вводит в состояние экстаза... Что? Я описал игру вашей мечты, да? Но не спешите ее покупать, ведь есть маленькая деталь в этом прекрасном блюде, это ее соус, который называется UBISOFT.
    Всё как обычно, отличная задумка, ужасная реализация.
    Эта    Прекрасная задумка, великолепная атмосфера, проработка сюжетов каждого из оперативников, а также уникальный интерфейс, который не режет глаз и вводит в состояние экстаза... Что? Я описал игру вашей мечты, да? Но не спешите ее покупать, ведь есть маленькая деталь в этом прекрасном блюде, это ее соус, который называется UBISOFT.
    Всё как обычно, отличная задумка, ужасная реализация.
    Эта прекрасная солянка приправлена уксусом, в виде огромного количества багов, постоянных вылетов серверов, плохой оптимизации и многого другого. Просто невозможно понять, как могут быть настолько разносторонние баги. Если ошибки механик (которых очень много, и они действительно мешают играть) еще допустимы (хоть и не в таком количестве), то такие баги, как снятие очков рейтинга за победу или пропажа вещей после открытия лутбокса, это необъяснимо. Да я даже за некоторых оперативников не могу играть теперь, например за Blitz, это опер. с щитом, которого я люблю всем сердцем, но мне пришлось его отпустить, потому что его щит теперь пропускает пули, опять же из-за багов.
    Ладно бы данные ошибки фиксили, но нет, лучше выпускать новых оперативников, новые карты, которые несут еще больше багов!
    Аналогов данной игры я найти не могу, поэтому и до сих пор в нее играю, и искренне надеюсь, что UBISOFT когда-нибудь да возьмутся за голову, а пока, очень плохо.    … Expand
  19. Ammonium
    Feb 9, 2021
    6
    To start off the game itself is not bad and has a high learning curve i think that it's even way too much for new players.

    But the Community destroys the game really hard i never encountered this much toxicity in a game. Not even in 20 years of playing CS. You get as a low lvl player often just Team killed. Be a girl? Be ready to get Team killed from your mates and Teabagged and    To start off the game itself is not bad and has a high learning curve i think that it's even way too much for new players.

    But the Community destroys the game really hard i never encountered this much toxicity in a game.
    Not even in 20 years of playing CS.

    You get as a low lvl player often just Team killed.
    Be a girl? Be ready to get Team killed from your mates and Teabagged and listen to all sorts of ****
    People that just grief the entire match.
    Good example join a match there is a 4stack then be prepared to get reported and team killed and that they throw the match.

    Like i said the game itself is not bad but the community destroys the fun of it completely.    … Expand
  20. TheCraftingZomb
    Jun 22, 2019
    6
    Rainbow Six Siege is a game as described by its cover. It does not appeal to me that much but it does have a lot of pros. The game has very good graphics and does stuff like leaning left or right just like anybody would do. The characters are well designed and some are very unique and stand out among the rest. The music and levels are definitely down graded from the previous games.Rainbow Six Siege is a game as described by its cover. It does not appeal to me that much but it does have a lot of pros. The game has very good graphics and does stuff like leaning left or right just like anybody would do. The characters are well designed and some are very unique and stand out among the rest. The music and levels are definitely down graded from the previous games. Unlocking characters and gaining exp will take a very long time and will probably get boring after a while.… Expand
  21. hspreg
    Jan 9, 2020
    6
    The game itself as a tactical shooter is the best in nowdays. But the view model... I got killed many times by this **** mechanisim. I stay in cover , I cannot see the enemy, but the half off my body exposed and get killed. And of course hitreg... I shoot well, but when I see an enemy face to face, I mostly die. I have 180ms reaction time average and 30ms ping. Does not matter... IThe game itself as a tactical shooter is the best in nowdays. But the view model... I got killed many times by this **** mechanisim. I stay in cover , I cannot see the enemy, but the half off my body exposed and get killed. And of course hitreg... I shoot well, but when I see an enemy face to face, I mostly die. I have 180ms reaction time average and 30ms ping. Does not matter... I maximized my personal skills in thousands of hours, like map knowledge, accuracy, response time, but the game mechanics don't let me develop further. So confusing...… Expand
  22. Sanghelic
    May 23, 2020
    6
    personalmente se me hizo aburrido, es muy tactico lo cual lo hace bastante divertio, sobre todo para jugar con amigos, pero no es mi tipo de juego, sobre todo porque no me gustan los juegos que tienen un meta muy muy establecido y tiene ya 20000 personajes que desbloquear (o comprar) cuando tu apenas tienes 1
  23. pur__0_0__
    Mar 22, 2021
    6
    After having played so many Call of Duty games, CS:GO and Team Fortress 2, this game feels like a step back, especially when you play it with a controller in which case the aiming is almost impossible. It feels like it has really clunky controls. The aiming is very hard with players like Clash and Montagne. We cannot pick up the weapons dropped by dead enemies (this made sense in TeamAfter having played so many Call of Duty games, CS:GO and Team Fortress 2, this game feels like a step back, especially when you play it with a controller in which case the aiming is almost impossible. It feels like it has really clunky controls. The aiming is very hard with players like Clash and Montagne. We cannot pick up the weapons dropped by dead enemies (this made sense in Team Fortress 2 and Overwatch since they are class-based characters but there's no reason here). There are a lot of smurf accounts that abuse us for not playing on their level (even though we are in the Newcomers level), and there is no way to report such players.

    In terms of visual appeal this game is great. There are also a large number of maps to choose from, which makes this game look like it had a lot more potential. There are also plenty of characters to choose from. Though it lacks a campaign mode, it makes up for it with Challenges (which are also very difficult for new players). So overall I'd say it's a gorgeous looking game ruined by its bad controls and community.    … Expand
  24. tommydlbass
    Aug 16, 2020
    6
    Good game that turned into **** by the community and the p2w characters that are much better and useful than the "free" ones. I love the strategy that this game offers but I don't understand why the kill a team mate is activated and why the community is so toxic. Don't buy this game.
  25. pan1ni
    Jul 20, 2020
    6
    I have a love relationship with this game even though i love its core gameplay the balencing is often broken and hit reg and glitches are comon, hackers have been a recent big problem and balancing maps and operators usaly takes way too long if i where you i would rather put your time in competive shooters that are functioning to be fair
  26. Virr
    Dec 15, 2020
    6
    Игра хороша, НО... Звук просто ужасен. для шутера позиционирование звука крайне важно. тут - это какой-то рендом. очень плохая оптимизация. Конечно, можно сделать скидку на старый движок, но игра обновлялась (а последний патч вообще перекачал клиент полностью)... баги анимация, читеры, рандом... всё здесь.
    может быть неплохим вариантом для группы из 5 человек - чтоб погореть или    Игра хороша, НО... Звук просто ужасен. для шутера позиционирование звука крайне важно. тут - это какой-то рендом. очень плохая оптимизация. Конечно, можно сделать скидку на старый движок, но игра обновлялась (а последний патч вообще перекачал клиент полностью)... баги анимация, читеры, рандом... всё здесь.
    может быть неплохим вариантом для группы из 5 человек - чтоб погореть или посмеяться в компании.

    6/10 от меня

    The game is good, BUT ... The sound is terrible. for a shooter, sound positioning is extremely important. here - it's some kind of random. very bad optimization. Of course, you can make a discount on the old engine, but the game was updated (and the last patch was completely full client re-download) ... animation bugs, cheaters, random ... everything is here.
    can be a good option for a group of 5 people - to get burned or laugh in the company.

    6/10 from me    … Expand
  27. Asandberg
    Feb 28, 2021
    6
    It's a first person shooter, like csgo but its actually innovative and requires some brain usage to play. But the lack of content and repetitiveness makes it a boring game.
  28. Kakafria
    Nov 22, 2021
    6
    ╭───────────╮
    ┃_____● ══__⊙°°    ┃
    ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃█ UBISOFT FIX IT!!    █┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃ ┃                ╭───────────╮
    ┃_____● ══__⊙°°    ┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃█ UBISOFT FIX IT!!    █┃
    ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃
    ┃███████████┃ ┃███████████┃
    ┃           
  29. DonldTrump_45Th
    Jan 26, 2023
    6
    Hello, this is a default review because i'm forced to use 75 characters. I'll edit this review in the future talking about the game, don't worry ;)

    Used to be a great game
    My final rate is: 6
  30. AgentLvi
    Dec 27, 2022
    6
    not bad game, but not good either. The multiplayer is really miss & match, visual is decent, and the voice is also decent
  31. azor_4e
    Mar 5, 2023
    6
    Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is a thrilling tactical shooter that pits two teams of five against each other in various modes and maps. The game offers a lot of variety and customization, with dozens of operators to choose from, each with their own unique gadgets and abilities. The game also boasts realistic graphics and sound effects, creating an immersive experience that keeps you onTom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is a thrilling tactical shooter that pits two teams of five against each other in various modes and maps. The game offers a lot of variety and customization, with dozens of operators to choose from, each with their own unique gadgets and abilities. The game also boasts realistic graphics and sound effects, creating an immersive experience that keeps you on the edge of your seat. However, the game is not without its flaws. The game suffers from frequent bugs and glitches, some of which can ruin the match or even crash the game. The game also has a steep learning curve and a toxic community that can make it hard for new or casual players to enjoy. The developers do not seem to listen to the feedback or suggestions from the players, often ignoring the most pressing issues or making unpopular changes. Overall, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is a fun and challenging game for fans of the genre, but it could use some more polish and communication from the developers. I would give it a 6/10 rating.… Expand
  32. BestNoob
    Feb 18, 2020
    5
    Es macht Spaß, aber es zerstört auch Leben...

    Das Matchmaking (Competitive Ranked) kann man komplett vergessen, Spieler mit 500H Spielzeit werden gegen Spieler mit unter 100 Stunden ins Ranglistenspiel geworfen. Es spielt keine Rolle wie gut du bist Up/Down Ranks gibt es nur für Win/Lose. Skill zählt kaum, da das Spiel extrem Lag/Latenz anfällig ist, es kommt öfters vor, dass Kugeln    Es macht Spaß, aber es zerstört auch Leben...

    Das Matchmaking (Competitive Ranked) kann man komplett vergessen, Spieler mit 500H Spielzeit werden gegen Spieler mit unter 100 Stunden ins Ranglistenspiel geworfen. Es spielt keine Rolle wie gut du bist Up/Down Ranks gibt es nur für Win/Lose.

    Skill zählt kaum, da das Spiel extrem Lag/Latenz anfällig ist, es kommt öfters vor, dass Kugeln nicht treffen oder ein Gegner einen vorher sieht, aus dem Grund sind auch immer die mit den High Pings, die die am meisten Kills haben.

    Dann gibt es noch einen Haufen Trolle, Saboteure, Team Killer, Cheater,
    High Pings, schlechte Performance, die das Spielgeschehen trüben, gerade zu Free Weekends und Sales ist es unmöglich ordentlich zu spielen.

    Das Game .. ist Geld & Zeitverschwendung.
    Nur als Full 5er Team macht es Sinn und Spaß dieses Spiel zu spielen.    … Expand
  33. JohnConnor333
    Dec 1, 2015
    5
    Not to minimize the rediculous "0" ratings, teh fact that this game is getting 10's is just as much of a joke. The game is not currently playable online, consistent disconnects. 10's must be coming from ubisoft, what a joke. I own this game - got it 'free' with buyin a gtx 970. From the 5 hours I played, graphics are last gen, gameplay can be great if servers beef up, and not worthNot to minimize the rediculous "0" ratings, teh fact that this game is getting 10's is just as much of a joke. The game is not currently playable online, consistent disconnects. 10's must be coming from ubisoft, what a joke. I own this game - got it 'free' with buyin a gtx 970. From the 5 hours I played, graphics are last gen, gameplay can be great if servers beef up, and not worth $60 price for online only. If a game is online only - no campaign, it has to show why it justifies the price for limited options.… Expand
  34. mevsthevoices
    Feb 29, 2016
    5
    Improves on nothing over previous installments, fails as a shooter. The idea that this has anything to do with tactics is pretty laughable. Give me back Rainbow Six Vegas 1/2 anyday, much more solid games
  35. HappyPhilXD
    Sep 16, 2017
    5
    So, the game is in Beta since launch (don't miss that beta sign when entering multiplayer) it's still haveing a big ptoblem with hacks they can't detect and the massive netcode problem and pings are all over the place. And then they want you to pay for 2 Season passes for a game in beta.
  36. Traslogan
    Aug 24, 2017
    5
    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's no requirements for getting into ranked, and the devs spam free-weekends so often that it's about as bad as finding servers full of 12-year-olds who just learned how to turn a computer on.
    There's a lot you can say about Siege that is positive,    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's no requirements for getting into ranked, and the devs spam free-weekends so often that it's about as bad as finding servers full of 12-year-olds who just learned how to turn a computer on.

    There's a lot you can say about Siege that is positive, but the developers, even during this "operation health" project that they've claimed will improve the game, are never fixing the critical issues that make the game have no incentive for you to even try and play.

    A few examples:
    It takes 10 games to get a rank assigned in Ranked mode. The game rigs the 10 games so you are almost always with randoms and usually other unranked players, but rarely against other unranked players and usually organized teams.
    Upon being ranked, you will be given a poor rank thanks to this even if you perform well (Because the rank system is extremely volatile and even if you get 30 kills, losing is still that punishing), and you will begin waiting 10-15 minutes for a game because it now refuses to put you with anyone other than those at said horrendous ranks, but the game will continue to tell you that you will only wait 1 -2 minutes, and will continue blatantly lying at all times.
    There's no requirements for people to have before playing Ranked, so people jump straight into Ranked and ruin it for everyone else after just learning the keybinds in on game of casual. This is a problem with the community, but it's one that is critical and fixable by the devs.

    The only reason this game hasn't become as horrendous as Counter Strike Global Offensive is because, unlike Valve, they haven't started banning people for complaining on the forums. Yet.    … Expand
  37. Tcore999
    Dec 9, 2015
    5
    Great game in theory. Hit markers should not be in Rainbow Six. Made it really arcade feeling. PC movement is great. Got it on XBOX one as a gift. Really clunky and snappy on controller. Disappointed because of the many error codes, connection issues, and lack of customer support by UbiSoft. No campaign and really not worth $60 for the 8 maps you get. Very limited in game play. ThoughGreat game in theory. Hit markers should not be in Rainbow Six. Made it really arcade feeling. PC movement is great. Got it on XBOX one as a gift. Really clunky and snappy on controller. Disappointed because of the many error codes, connection issues, and lack of customer support by UbiSoft. No campaign and really not worth $60 for the 8 maps you get. Very limited in game play. Though there are 100's of ways to defeat your opponents. Buy at your own risk.… Expand
  38. CustomPhase
    Dec 28, 2015
    5
    Let me clear it out first - the game itself, its moment-to-moment gameplay and features are amazing. I really, really enjoy some moments of it, and i think this game may have huge potencial...
    BUT
    Everything is completely ruined by an awful, i repeat, HORRENDOUSLY AWFUL, tech-side state of the game and its servers. And im not alone here. Seriously, have this game went through multiple    Let me clear it out first - the game itself, its moment-to-moment gameplay and features are amazing. I really, really enjoy some moments of it, and i think this game may have huge potencial...
    BUT
    Everything is completely ruined by an awful, i repeat, HORRENDOUSLY AWFUL, tech-side state of the game and its servers. And im not alone here. Seriously, have this game went through multiple test stages, or they just say so? I dont know how they cold have missed all of these issues. And they are found amongst the majority of players, and you can find those in pretty much any negative review for this game:
    - awful netcode with random delays and discrepancies between what you see and what you actually get, even with 40 hours to actually understand whats going on, and experience everything, that developers **** up.

    In short - dont buy it now. Read reviews later down the update line, 2-3 updates/patches in. See if most of these problems are fixed, and if they are - then go for it, you'll have a lot of fun.    … Expand
  39. gordonbays
    Jan 19, 2016
    5
    Polished game but lack the essence of great fps games. The "maps" are very small and the gameplay is fast paced, not really addicting game. There is much room to learn from suceess games like CS.
  40. Robinjhoe
    Feb 6, 2016
    5
    It is a shooter. And it is not the typical Rainbow Six. But for a Game it is quite good.

    The Problem is, that it has the Ambition to be a skillful tactic shooter, what actually happens the most time however is pure luck. In your typical 5 vs 5 Game everything is important. Your position, the position of Gadgets, the Gadgets itself ( so which Operator you chose). But ultimately its just    It is a shooter. And it is not the typical Rainbow Six. But for a Game it is quite good.

    The Problem is, that it has the Ambition to be a skillful tactic shooter, what actually happens the most time however is pure luck. In your typical 5 vs 5 Game everything is important. Your position, the position of Gadgets, the Gadgets itself ( so which Operator you chose). But ultimately its just pure luck. I have seen people randomly shooting through walls and giving you a headshot. People who throw grenades or c4 randomly somewhere and killing you. But that is not a Problem of the Game.

    Because the Game itself has been improved a bit. But still. Loading Bugs. One Person is on the Desktop while loading and everyone is stuck in the loading screen. Matchmaking is awful. Either you are alone or in a full squad or you can wait forever to get into a Game. Very much glitching through walls while lying on the ground and getting shot through an indestructible Wall. Holes that arent holes and you thow a grenade against an invisible Wall.

    And finally. It is kind of true. It is not as casual as CoD or Battlefield. Which doesnt mean that People are prevented from that Gameplay. It happens a lot, that Defenders just screw at everything run out and either shoot you at your spawn or run towards you outside and shoot everyone because no one saw that coming. And then claim they got an Ace and we are noobs. And what is their penalty? Being constantly spotted. Thats all. Instead of giving them 10 seconds and the will be killed, no they are spotted and thats it.

    Or even better. My Squad is playing a lot of this game. We are playing it every Day and still have fun even if it is kind of repetitive. But the most unbelievable thing that happens, is that there are still Trolls that shoot their own teammates at spawn. Or better the whole team is fighting and insult each other leading to even more teamkills. ( was a funny Game though)

    All in all, the game sure has its moments. But the fact that it is a casual version of Rainbow Six, the lack of Game modes and the kind of irritating Gameplay decisions are often annoying. And of course dont forget Uplay. A fun but average Shooter.    … Expand
  41. LordZ_
    May 30, 2016
    5
    Good looking game, but multiplayer is not that fun because net code is in beta ... and take an hour to have a game
    There's no real solo campain and no coop (only bot).
    Well if u like Rainbow SIX stuff don't buy it.
  42. ihateubisoft
    Dec 21, 2016
    5
    A game that is:
    + giving you a little chance for playing tactical
    + really not bad, if there wheren't things like: It is really, really bugged as hell laggy as **** (80+ ping always, but a normal ping of 39-40) it does have the most unfair matchmaking system I have ever witnessed. It kinda sucks for beginners. Really, it just sucks for beginners. Don't argue about that. Even    A game that is:
    + giving you a little chance for playing tactical
    + really not bad, if there wheren't things like:

    It is really, really bugged as hell
    laggy as **** (80+ ping always, but a normal ping of 39-40)
    it does have the most unfair matchmaking system I have ever witnessed.

    It kinda sucks for beginners.
    Really, it just sucks for beginners. Don't argue about that.
    Even with Singeplayer Tut.
    This game could be so much, but Ubisoft just ruined it by hosting ****ty servers.    … Expand
  43. JanekDelux
    Jul 17, 2021
    5
    This game back in 2016 used to be my favourite. The characters had unique but not overpowered abilities (for the most part). The game had and still has its flaws; like problems with net-code and aim but overall i enjoyed it.
    Until they had decided to remove half of the maps from competitive scene and add characters with abilities like from overwatch. I know they did remake those maps, and    This game back in 2016 used to be my favourite. The characters had unique but not overpowered abilities (for the most part). The game had and still has its flaws; like problems with net-code and aim but overall i enjoyed it.
    Until they had decided to remove half of the maps from competitive scene and add characters with abilities like from overwatch. I know they did remake those maps, and thats good. But the problem is those maps still have same problems they had before remake: like spawnpeeking.

    I don't despise this game, but i think things need to be changed in order to revive its old charm.

    5.6/10    … Expand
  44. spigotbush
    Jun 14, 2018
    5
    This game, I wish i could rate it higher. Its not a bad game at its core, the gameplay is solid, the graphics even turned down are good and turned up it looks nice. The weapons are interesting and have plenty of variety and the formula is solid. I have put quite some time into it and sometimes its great.
    The problems come from the community. I dont really have gamer friends so I play    This game, I wish i could rate it higher. Its not a bad game at its core, the gameplay is solid, the graphics even turned down are good and turned up it looks nice. The weapons are interesting and have plenty of variety and the formula is solid. I have put quite some time into it and sometimes its great.
    The problems come from the community. I dont really have gamer friends so I play casual, i have never played a single ranked game. Unfortunately the game is really biased towards groups. It is really clear when you come up against a team who talk and know each other as they just destroy the other team. Which is not a bad thing in itself, but when you are in a team of randoms is is a gamble which rarely pays off. You often end up in games with some of the most obnoxious people you could expect, who abuse the vote kick because they are bored or scream and rant because you didnt do what they wanted. Despite the fact that they never talk about plans, you are just expected to do everything for them. Team kills are rife and i dont mean accidental ones when people just walk into your firing line. Expect to be killed by your own team on 3/5 matches, either for not being telepathic or just for being the first one they see.
    If the game takes a minute to load, because it wont start until the whole player count are fully loaded up and ready (a good thing), then get ready to see a chat full of unnecessary and offensive nonsense.
    The calibre of your random team mates goes downhill drastically when school is out, a clear difference. to the point that i wont play evenings or weekends just because it is not fun.
    Ubisoft seem to take half hearted attempts to stem the toxicity but it makes no difference. For a while they were banning all over the place for toxic behaviour and the game became a nicer place for it, then they let up and its back to being unpleasant again. In my opinion they should be policing the game better in some way, it is a really high profile game and they should be making a point with it.

    if you have a good group of friends then i imagine this game is awesome. The game itself is great, well supported and kept fresh and interesting. If it wasnt for the free reign of trolls and toxicity its would be an 8-9 for me, which i think is a real shame.    … Expand
  45. WoW1
    May 27, 2020
    5
    Rainbow Six Siege - это Overwatch, для тех, кто предпочитает "туц-туц", вместо "пиу-пиу".
    Дома, по всей видимости, строят, либо из пенопласта, либо из бетона. Даже те, что из дерева. А детские кровати из пуленепробиваемых пластин. Снаряжение намертво прибито к оперативнику. Ты не можешь испытать закрытого оперативника.Ты не можешь переместить, защищаемого заложника. Даже, если у тебя    Rainbow Six Siege - это Overwatch, для тех, кто предпочитает "туц-туц", вместо "пиу-пиу".
    Дома, по всей видимости, строят, либо из пенопласта, либо из бетона. Даже те, что из дерева. А детские кровати из пуленепробиваемых пластин. Снаряжение намертво прибито к оперативнику. Ты не можешь испытать закрытого оперативника.Ты не можешь переместить, защищаемого заложника. Даже, если у тебя кончились патроны, ты не сможешь подобрать оружие.
    К этой игре можно было бы относиться серьёзно, если бы карты были процедурно-генерируемые. В таком случае геймплей не сводился бы к заучиванию карт.
    Глушитель не делает выстрел бесшумным, совсем. Откуда басовые частоты в звуке выстрела?
    Логика, реализм, ИИ (в описании игры указана "сингл-плеер") - никогда не слышал об этом.
    Микротранзакции...

    ПС:Если хотите реализма лучше обратите внимание на Insurgency: Sandstorm.
    -----------------------------------
    Rainbow Six Siege is an Overwatch for those who prefer the tuts-tuts instead of pi-piu.
    Apparently, houses are being built either from polystyrene foam or from concrete. Even those made of wood. And children's beds are made of bulletproof plates. Equipment tightly nailed to the operators. You cannot experience a closed operator. You cannot relocate a protected hostage. Even if you run out of ammo, you won’t be able to pick up a weapon.
    This game could be taken seriously if the cards were procedurally generated. In this case, the gameplay would not come down to memorizing cards.
    The silencer does not make the shot silent, at all. Where did the bass frequencies come from in the sound of the shot?
    Logic, realism, AI ("single player" is indicated in the description of the game) - I never heard of this.
    Microtransactions...

    PS: If you want realism, better pay attention to Insurgency: Sandstorm.    … Expand
  46. siera97
    Mar 22, 2018
    5
    I played this game for 40 hours in pvp mode via uplay. I bought starter edition but earlier i played on standard (during free week)

    Gameplay wise this game is great, shooting feels nice, tactical options are giving a nice touch to your usuall run and kill. Thinking is almost as important as good aim. Unfortunatly matchmaking is a joke so at first you will be crushed by veteran    I played this game for 40 hours in pvp mode via uplay. I bought starter edition but earlier i played on standard (during free week)

    Gameplay wise this game is great, shooting feels nice, tactical options are giving a nice touch to your usuall run and kill. Thinking is almost as important as good aim.

    Unfortunatly matchmaking is a joke so at first you will be crushed by veteran players, either high level/rank or smurf accounts. This game is half made of smurf accounts. Strating from lvl 20 you may play rankeds where low ranking players will be much closer to your lvl of skill. This brings another problem as veteran players expect you to know maps etc.

    Toxic comunity is middle name of this game. You gonna be yelled at, and they gonna rage on chat. Occasionally you will be kicked or teamkilled. Its normal. That said there are also nice people in this game, generally based on my experience in Europe, 25% are toxic, 10% are nice, and rest simply doesnt give a **** Playing casual means nothing, they rage all the same.
    Game is also plauged by bugs. Every now and then im throwed out from mm because "The game you are trying to join is full." One day i couldnt play at all because mm wasnt working at all, so i couldnt find a match.

    Netcode and hitboxes are a big flaw too, sometimes it registers hits strangly, you see that you or enemy was aiming in one place and bullets fall in another (im talking about single shoots no recoil included). Sometimes in a death cam i can see that enemy is standing not where i saw him on my screen.

    Game isnt cheap at least by my standards, you buy this game and still have to unlock operatos. I bought starter edition as i dont mean a little grind. Time to unlock one basic op is around 10 hours. On standard edition it is much faster and takes up to one hour.

    As for fixing this game by ubi, I simply dont believe they are able to. Developers are working slowly, which can be a good thing, but they are workign to slowly. Most of bugs i have been experiencing are in this game from begining. When i bought this game about 2 week ago i got 2 free ops instead of 6. I contacted ubi support, but they werent able to fix this. So if they cant fix missing operators i doubt they can fix netcode etc. Most of problems are persent because of using Anvil engine, known from AC series, it doesnt work in multiplayer shooter with destructable objects.

    After considering all of the above i can give 5 out of 10. If all of the problems would be removed we would have 9/10 tactical shooter, sadly i doubt it will ever happen.    … Expand
  47. Jaker747
    Oct 5, 2018
    5
    I wanted to like this game. When I saw and tried mechanics and graphics, I was just struck with an indescribable amount of amazingness. But this all became worthless when I played multiplayer. It is whoever has lightning fast reactions wins. Whoever sees the other first wins. It is luck based and biased toward fast people.
  48. RazorSamurai
    Jan 11, 2019
    5
    Казуальное дерьмицо, лгбт параша, псевдохардкорная игра для 12 летних девочек, донатная хуйня, гриндилка ебучая, скучная поебота, хуевый геймплей и комьюнити токсиков дауничей. (В КСГО они есть но они не могут тебе никак помешать игре, в радуге можно легко помешать челику нормально играть и не быть забаненным, а написав слово негр можно отлететь нахуй)
    Платина 3.    Казуальное дерьмицо, лгбт параша, псевдохардкорная игра для 12 летних девочек, донатная хуйня, гриндилка ебучая, скучная поебота, хуевый геймплей и комьюнити токсиков дауничей. (В КСГО они есть но они не могут тебе никак помешать игре, в радуге можно легко помешать челику нормально играть и не быть забаненным, а написав слово негр можно отлететь нахуй)
    Платина 3.
  49. GalluskY
    Nov 19, 2018
    5
    This game is pleasurable as hell and frustrating in the exact same way. There is these times when you clutch a 1v4-5 and you feel incredibly powerful and then, there is these time when Ubisoft don't want you to play your game.

    The way this game has been designed is awesome, I never played a FPS like this before. One bullet kill (headshot) with every weapon. Map designed to offer an    This game is pleasurable as hell and frustrating in the exact same way. There is these times when you clutch a 1v4-5 and you feel incredibly powerful and then, there is these time when Ubisoft don't want you to play your game.

    The way this game has been designed is awesome, I never played a FPS like this before. One bullet kill (headshot) with every weapon. Map designed to offer an infinity of possibilities with the new operators offered by Ubisoft every 3 months. The gadgets of the operators that allow you to create real strategies for attacking and defending rounds with a good team. And finally, the gunfights are uncredibles.

    And then..... And then... the **** load of "NOT OKAY" things comes to punch you right in the face...

    - But what are these "Things" you're speaking of my dear rager ?
    - Oh, really bruh ? You don't know ? Here is the list :

    Headshots (HS) that are not headshots, in both ways. Someone not aiming the head and doing a HS or you (or your team mates) aiming the head but not doing an HS. Two possibilities, one, the hit regulation is shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit (yeah yeah, this much "i"), second, their servers can't handle this much of players at the same time. Basically, when you aim at the head, you expect your shot to do a nice and smooth headshot right ? Nununununununununu, not with Ubisoft bruh. Just watch and cry cuz there is nothing you can do.

    Then comes the matchmaking. Just to be clear, I'm not speaking about the ranking system (let's not make this list too long as it is already), but the actual system that make you join a game for example. This system is incredibly buggy, it will not allow you to rejoin a ranked game after a connexion issue or even better it will make you join a ranked game after you canceled your matchmaking request. Sometimes you shall not be able to play with your friends cuz the game doesn't want you to create a squad. This system will do everything it can to f**k your sessions with your friends.

    Now let's do a quick window on sync. issues. You know this time when you saw a closed door that was actually opened for the server and you died because it was opened for the enemy as well ? Nope, you don't ? Welcome to R6S.
    But, do you remember this time you launched a ranked game and your game ended up crashing at round 1 ? Nope, you still don't ? Too bad, again, welcome to R6S.

    Last, but not least, the community. OMFG. I thought overwatch had a toxic community. That was before my first game of Siege. You shall see people Team Killing you because you took "their" operators or because you did not do as they wanted it to be. You think it's a small issue ? Sure, no problem. Just try to play two casual games without being insulted or Team Killed.

    Oh, I almost forgot, there is many, sorry, MANY hackers. I guess it's part of the game.... lol

    But to be fair...

    No, just kidding, there is not such thing in R6S.

    On the other end, if you can go over these "things" I'm talking about then its the greatest FPS you may ever play. Hope this can help.

    This game is amazing and awfull at the same time, so I thought 5 was a good grade.

    Peace.    … Expand
  50. Macbaine
    Mar 3, 2019
    5
    realy good game when you play but
    im a coop player... realy hard to find a group,
    is possible to play alone but is realy ... realy ... realy hard ... not possible for every one

    microtransaction a lot and realy expensif
    exp and money in game too slow when you play coop and you dont progress if you play alone
  51. KITR
    Jul 15, 2019
    5
    Bad game. Well, actually not that bad, but community, updates, new characters, just not good. But it's fun to play, This game can actually entertain you. You can find fun here. It's hard, but possible
  52. Shtern
    Jul 3, 2020
    5
    Игра существует уже очень долго, но проблемы игры не рашаются и по сей день.
    Хорошая сорвеновательная игра, я бы даже сказал лучшая, но как для меня, это просто очередной шутер, потому что, удовольствие можно получать играя тока с друзьями/командой иначе никак вообще. Мне не повезло иметь группу людей, которая бы со мной играла в эту замечательную игру,.
    Проблем у игры очень много, от    Игра существует уже очень долго, но проблемы игры не рашаются и по сей день.
    Хорошая сорвеновательная игра, я бы даже сказал лучшая, но как для меня, это просто очередной шутер, потому что, удовольствие можно получать играя тока с друзьями/командой иначе никак вообще. Мне не повезло иметь группу людей, которая бы со мной играла в эту замечательную игру,.
    Проблем у игры очень много, от вечно лагающих дисикнкающих серверов, до банального читерства и смехотворной цены за игру, что позволяет этим читерам существовать.
    Мачмейкинг который в бетте наверное до самого конца существования игры будет, потому что я не могу по другому написать, ибо когда ты ищешь игру сам, почему то игра считает своей обязаностью кинуть против тебя команду из 5 человек, в то время как в твоей команде все играют соло/два человека.
    Вообщем бессмысленная трата денег и времени, если у вас заведома нет Команды/Друзей с которыми вы в 45 сможете играть и железных нервов от вечно тупящих серверов.    … Expand
  53. Hellanger
    Dec 29, 2021
    5
    From a serious game that everyone loved so much, nothing remained, the game more and more resembles Fortnite, again Ubisoft is doing everything to make normal players leave and stupid children come.
  54. Membean1
    Jun 4, 2020
    5
    Rainbow six has been a long time favorite, but the bugs have gotten the best of me.
  55. 2I2l1a
    May 1, 2022
    5
    Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is inspired by real world counter-terrorist organizations, and inserts players in the middle of lethal close-quarters engagements. For the first time in a Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six game, players can choose from a variety of unique Counter Terrorist Operators and engage in tangible sieges, a new style of assault in which enemies have the means to transformTom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is inspired by real world counter-terrorist organizations, and inserts players in the middle of lethal close-quarters engagements. For the first time in a Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six game, players can choose from a variety of unique Counter Terrorist Operators and engage in tangible sieges, a new style of assault in which enemies have the means to transform their environments into modern strongholds while Rainbow Six teams lead the assault to breach the enemy’s position.… Expand
  56. GlocktorSeuss
    Jul 13, 2020
    5
    The main problem with R6 is that it's extremely difficult to get into now that other players have become so good at it. While games like CSGO and Rainbow Six Siege competitive at heart, Rainbow Six Siege is on another level. CSGO's main skill is aiming, while R6 has so many elements and new things to master. It's an well-crafted but extremely frustrating game.
  57. Bottie
    Apr 10, 2022
    5
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is my most played game on Steam with 528.8 hours, but anyway I'll talk a bit about this game today.
    The main point of criticism is that in year 4 season 1-4 and in year 5 season 1 there were still 2 operators per season and that's still the good thing, because from year 5 season 2 up to the current year 7 season 1 there is only one operator per season and    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is my most played game on Steam with 528.8 hours, but anyway I'll talk a bit about this game today.
    The main point of criticism is that in year 4 season 1-4 and in year 5 season 1 there were still 2 operators per season and that's still the good thing, because from year 5 season 2 up to the current year 7 season 1 there is only one operator per season and that gave the game half a broken neck.
    The last new map was in year 4 season 1 in Operation Outback (March 2019) in the last 11 seasons there were only reworks of old maps so even less content and we can only hope that there will be 2 operators again in the future and a new map will occasionally have a map rework per season.
    The community is almost more toxic than the League of Legends community and that must mean something, I've had rounds in which even beginners who just bought the game have already been yelled at by gold or platinum players.
    Graphically it looks very good, but you never judge a book by its cover, the content counts more.
    It was a fun experience with friends, but I could also play it alone and have fun (if I didn't have toxic high ranked dorks on my team).
    In the end I have to say if you want to get this game wait until it's on sale because today it's not worth paying 20€ for it anymore since the price in 2018- early 2020 was much more demanding than today.
    It's a shame what happened to this game today, shame on you Ubisoft    … Expand
  58. Nick7000
    Mar 9, 2023
    5
    Симпатичный онлайн-шутер. Минус два балла за повесточку, минус балл за батлпасс, в остальном позалипать можно.
  59. Edik191
    Dec 3, 2021
    5
    Я купил игру в 2021 и что я скажу, мне игра в принципе понравилась геймплейно но
    В шутере ты видиш всяких розовых солдат с пони на голове и клоунских масок..
    И продвижение повестки полным ходом. Нерф персонажей и большим порогом вхождения, ведь тут за 1 секунду тебя выносят из-за угла, двери, стула с чего угодно.. Короче рекомендую Радугу только за свой уникальный геймплей а за все    Я купил игру в 2021 и что я скажу, мне игра в принципе понравилась геймплейно но
    В шутере ты видиш всяких розовых солдат с пони на голове и клоунских масок..
    И продвижение повестки полным ходом.
    Нерф персонажей и большим порогом вхождения, ведь тут за 1 секунду тебя выносят из-за угла, двери, стула с чего угодно.. Короче рекомендую Радугу только за свой уникальный геймплей а за все другое нет. И игра как по мне постепенно умирает.    … Expand
  60. cohlestic
    Dec 11, 2021
    5
    I played this game almost 1.5k hours (my last rank is diamond, before the rank update) and still broken. Bugs, server problems, toxic and racist player are everywhere in this game. I do not recommend this game as hell.
  61. Rocambole
    Jan 12, 2023
    5
    Au fur et à mesure que le jeu est mis à jour, de plus en plus de problèmes apparaissent, mais il est clair que les responsables n'ont tout simplement pas la détermination ou l'efficacité nécessaires pour corriger les bugs.
  62. Stur
    Jun 3, 2023
    5
    its really hit or miss sometimes its a blast other times you just die, the skill based matchmaking uses mmr to decipher who you go against which means if you get a good game the next 4 or 5 are just gonna be hell
  63. TheGvH
    Aug 21, 2023
    5
    Rainbow Six Siege offers a mixed experience that balances cool mechanics with some glaring drawbacks. While the game boasts intriguing gameplay mechanics, the gunplay unfortunately feels lackluster and fails to deliver the satisfying impact one would hope for. The updates introduced in 2022 did inject some freshness into the game, but they fell short of being truly compelling, failing toRainbow Six Siege offers a mixed experience that balances cool mechanics with some glaring drawbacks. While the game boasts intriguing gameplay mechanics, the gunplay unfortunately feels lackluster and fails to deliver the satisfying impact one would hope for. The updates introduced in 2022 did inject some freshness into the game, but they fell short of being truly compelling, failing to fully retain player interest. Despite its potential, Rainbow Six Siege struggles to maintain a consistent level of excitement, leaving players with a somewhat lukewarm impression of what could have been a standout tactical shooter.… Expand
  64. Psychocist
    Jun 11, 2016
    4
    I hardly ever write reviews, but felt compelled to after [thankfully] buying this game for only £12 on Steam. The destruction is great, and I'm sure it is a decent tactical shooter, but the gun play itself leaves a lot to be desired.

    Do not buy this expecting a successor to Vegas-style gameplay. There isn't much to do beyond the siege game type. Terrorist hunt is shockingly bad, almost    I hardly ever write reviews, but felt compelled to after [thankfully] buying this game for only £12 on Steam. The destruction is great, and I'm sure it is a decent tactical shooter, but the gun play itself leaves a lot to be desired.

    Do not buy this expecting a successor to Vegas-style gameplay. There isn't much to do beyond the siege game type. Terrorist hunt is shockingly bad, almost every entrance is blocked and you have to breach - no opening doors here.

    If you want something a littler spicier than camping inside small rooms, you're out of luck. No deathmatch, no team deathmatch, once you're dead in siege, you're dead and left waiting. No server browser, crappy matchmaking.

    I find the lack of variety in gameplay surprising considering how easy it would be to throw a few people on a map and let them shoot it out. If you're expecting ANYTHING like the previous instalments, you will be sorely disappointed.    … Expand
  65. Ruegrong
    Dec 17, 2015
    4
    Boosters, skins, all for microtransactions, i dont hate the game, it just shouldn't be rainbow six. The super fast gameplay is much like COD and on top of that there is no campaign. This game is far from worth $60
  66. carnivorCactae
    Mar 21, 2021
    4
    There is so much wrong with this game.
    Where do I even start?
    Basically it has nothing to do with tactics and especially nothing with Rainbow Six anymore. - why are there no doors anywhere? No building has doors?! - no cool "slowly open door and peek" with your mousewheel anymore. A feature even the 18 (!) year old game Rainbow Six did have! - the "Operators" started out semi and    There is so much wrong with this game.
    Where do I even start?

    Basically it has nothing to do with tactics and especially nothing with Rainbow Six anymore.

    - why are there no doors anywhere? No building has doors?!
    - no cool "slowly open door and peek" with your mousewheel anymore. A feature even the 18 (!) year old game Rainbow Six did have!
    - the "Operators" started out semi and pseudo-realistic but turned into a total Joke after only a year.
    -> now you have Characters that are like a mix of Call of Duty and Overwatch. Basically "Heroes" in a "tactical" Setting
    - Gampelay and rounds are essentially: Rushing in like a stressed and panicked speedrunner into buildings, breaching like crazy and shooting with guns that all have a weird little sway around the crosshair.

    Because anything slow and methodical wouldn't work for people with ADHS and the need to entertain huge E-sport-crowds, I guess?

    - the only time where you have at least a littlebit of methodical and tactical approach, is when you play with friends on "Training Grounds" (the former Terrorist Hunt"),
    but its nothing compared to SWAT 5 or the old Rainbow Six 3.
    -> All the AI-Enemies look the same,
    -> you can't even take bots as team-mates with you (you know, a feature even the 18 ! year old Rainbow Games had!)
    -> Ubi$oft nerfed the amount of "Renown" to oblivion (currency you need to unlock new characters (lol)) you get through single-player and coop-missions, so unlocking new operators takes horrendous amounts of time
    (~300 hours or you can spend real cash and that'll be over a hundred bucks. Just take a look at the currency-packs and the tiny amount of renown you earn ingame and do the math! There is a reason Ubi$oft keeps the Season-passes, ingame-currency and different editions as not selfexplanatory as possible!)
    -> Your weapons are less deadly and sometimes you'll have to shoot multiple rounds into enemies
    -> You can't make enemies give up / handcuff them
    -> downed AI-enemies will just die. They can't shoot at you or be secured or anything of this "boring tactical SWAT-stuff"

    So a LOT of the tention of true tactical shooters is gone.

    On the TECHNICAL side of things: Game cloggs 45 (!) gb on the hdd with only 14 maps (and no real bot-support and smaller mapsize in general!) compared to the 15 maps of RS 3 + 6 MP maps and additional fanmade maps = 21 maps! and runs worse with every update.

    Ubisoft decided to create a MOBA-Call-of-Duty-Overwatch mix for Twitch-streamers and the "E-Sports"-business, with zero intention to support the core-mechanic of tactical-shooters anymore.
    Their last "Playbook-Story-Trailer" made this pretty obvious.    … Expand
  67. Radioactivebuny
    Feb 7, 2016
    4
    Something about the way the game handles from a technical standpoint makes playing it almost physically painful. That, of course, pales in comparison to the emotional pain of knowing that I'll never get an experience like the original Rainbow Six games, or even the Vegas games back. The fact that Ghost Recon appears to be next after Future Soldier only makes this feeling worse.

    It    Something about the way the game handles from a technical standpoint makes playing it almost physically painful. That, of course, pales in comparison to the emotional pain of knowing that I'll never get an experience like the original Rainbow Six games, or even the Vegas games back. The fact that Ghost Recon appears to be next after Future Soldier only makes this feeling worse.

    It makes me sad to play it, and though I got it for $40, I regret every last penny of that purchase and wish I'd bought Squad instead.    … Expand
  68. askeptic
    Dec 10, 2015
    4
    The game takes a good idea, and completely wrecks it. Almost like Ubisoft didn't even try, or was rushed. It is a great concept, but the coding of the game falls flat on its face when trying to deliver the experience. Every game begins with a match of RC Pro AM remote control car derby if your offense, or run around doing the same old BS if your defense. The netcode is from the 90's andThe game takes a good idea, and completely wrecks it. Almost like Ubisoft didn't even try, or was rushed. It is a great concept, but the coding of the game falls flat on its face when trying to deliver the experience. Every game begins with a match of RC Pro AM remote control car derby if your offense, or run around doing the same old BS if your defense. The netcode is from the 90's and bullets don't always register a hit, which is a HUGE issue considering that most of the time it is 1 shot 1 kill. Graphics are pretty heavily outdated, and in game actions are painfully ugly. Why can one side pick up barbwire, but the other can't? Who smashes barb wire with the butt of a gun? Who disarms a bomb with a butt of a gun? All these things make the game feel incomplete, rushed, and just pretty darn fake which takes you out of the immersion that it was designed to be. Lastly, content to price is far far FAR off! Wait until after Christmas, then pick it up for $19.99. But even then be careful, people may of stopped playing making matches almost impossible to find.... If they decide to even fix their online servers which go down constantly without any notice.… Expand
  69. Beatlejuice
    Dec 7, 2015
    4
    The game can be fun but there is a lot to be said for this game. It has moments of tense action but it feels like a game much cheaper than the 60 dollar price tag. No campaign, no real single player, the content is quite limited as well as the game modes. It's all variations on attack and defend. The variety of the original R6 titles are missing. The purely 1 life TDM in symmetrical mapsThe game can be fun but there is a lot to be said for this game. It has moments of tense action but it feels like a game much cheaper than the 60 dollar price tag. No campaign, no real single player, the content is quite limited as well as the game modes. It's all variations on attack and defend. The variety of the original R6 titles are missing. The purely 1 life TDM in symmetrical maps are gone. There is so much missing.

    The realism is there where 1 or 2 shots will kill but the netcode and/or hit detection is fuzzy as hell. Watching replays it's infuriating when even the replay shows the bullet "hits" not actually hitting you.

    The graphics are mediocre and are below what AAA titles provide these days.

    All and all the game would be great at about half the price it is currently. The game could be heading towards pre-mature obscurity with a dwindling playerbase. Hopefully they fix the price so more players can come in.    … Expand
  70. Candy4breakfast
    Jan 3, 2016
    4
    Shooda,Wooda,Cooda. I video game is only as good as its weakest link. In This case it has nothing to do with the great gameplay this game offers but instead its poor netcode and server stability.

    What good is an online only game if you can't connect to a server.
  71. Glitshy
    Mar 26, 2016
    4
    It just isn't worth it. It's not worth 60 bucks. It's not worth playing alone. And it's not worth the name Rainbow Six, as it doesn't have a campaign, which made the series what it is. Every Rainbow Six had one, but hey threw it out of the window as soon as Tom Clancy couldn't argue about it, and it even costs much less money for Ubisoft. Obviously no reason to make it cost less than 60It just isn't worth it. It's not worth 60 bucks. It's not worth playing alone. And it's not worth the name Rainbow Six, as it doesn't have a campaign, which made the series what it is. Every Rainbow Six had one, but hey threw it out of the window as soon as Tom Clancy couldn't argue about it, and it even costs much less money for Ubisoft. Obviously no reason to make it cost less than 60 bucks. And they even could use his name. $$$… Expand
  72. JayDee
    Dec 4, 2015
    4
    The game itself is pretty good (9/10), but since it is based on multiplayer only, the horrible netcode makes the game a pain in the ass. Shooting an enemy to the head five times, seeing blood and then the guy turns areound, shoots back and kills you? That's routine. Just like other guys shooting air while they can't even see you, because you are hidden behind a wall (impenetrable) afterThe game itself is pretty good (9/10), but since it is based on multiplayer only, the horrible netcode makes the game a pain in the ass. Shooting an enemy to the head five times, seeing blood and then the guy turns areound, shoots back and kills you? That's routine. Just like other guys shooting air while they can't even see you, because you are hidden behind a wall (impenetrable) after you peaked and suddenly you are dead from their fire. Trying to hit someone with single shots while they are running is also a lottery. Either you are lucky and hit the spot where the game things the guys is, or the guy just runs away (while you clearly hit him in the back with your sniper rifle). That's the biggest problem the game has. There is also problem with clipping. When you lie down near a wall, quite often there is an enemy on the other side who can see your legs or head clipping through the wall. The worst thing about this is that they can just kill you while you can't do anything about it. I am not going to mention some smaller problems, because they are not important.… Expand
  73. lshrsyson
    Aug 18, 2023
    4
    This game was good... when it first came out but now its nothing but an embarrasment of its former self.
    The fact they got rid of the night time maps, reworked good maps into subpar maps. They keep reworking operators that make them worse then what they were.
    Not to mention with the new operators the weapons they have are recycled. Instead of adding new weapons in. Also while on the weapon    This game was good... when it first came out but now its nothing but an embarrasment of its former self.
    The fact they got rid of the night time maps, reworked good maps into subpar maps. They keep reworking operators that make them worse then what they were.
    Not to mention with the new operators the weapons they have are recycled. Instead of adding new weapons in. Also while on the weapon discussion they could let the operators from that particular country have a choice of both of the attackers and defenders weapons. So for example mute should have the choice of the sa80 along with his mp5k etc.
    Oh also the fact they changed from real factions to made up ones. So you won't see fbi, sas etc with any of the new operators.
    Not to mention the over the top skins you can get for the operators now.
    Tom clancy must be rolling in his grave.    … Expand
  74. FallonPhoenix
    Dec 1, 2015
    4
    There simply is not enough game here to warrant the price. As a huge fan of both rainbow six vegas games ((And all their respective DLC content)), I feel extremely disappointed. This game consists of 11 maps in its entirety. Their content roadmap states they will be adding 4 more over the next year. So sometime by Christmas Next year, there will be 15 Maps. ((MAYBE.))

    It is no    There simply is not enough game here to warrant the price. As a huge fan of both rainbow six vegas games ((And all their respective DLC content)), I feel extremely disappointed. This game consists of 11 maps in its entirety. Their content roadmap states they will be adding 4 more over the next year. So sometime by Christmas Next year, there will be 15 Maps. ((MAYBE.))

    It is no coincidence that the ability to select game modes is hidden under different UI than any other FPS would ever have utilized. The Developers are clearly trying to stretch what little content they have as far as possible. This is shameful.

    What game is there is certainly nice. The guns are nothing particularly amazing, but passable. The explosives are enough to illicit some tactical play. Nothing here hasn't been done before, better, Elsewhere. For a game with so little, Ubisoft then has the nerve to put in a cash shop, for boosters and skins. In case you weren't getting all of the limited content fast enough, and so they can churn out more recycled garbage.

    The AI feels no different than it did in Rainbow Six Vegas 2.

    Rainbow Six Vegas 2 Released in 2008 with:
    12 maps, 4 DLC maps
    A Full Campaign.
    Extensive character Customization

    The Maps themselves do not feel NEARLY as exciting as those in Vegas 2. We were going through neon sign graveyards, Bright, loud casinos, of various makes, a whole construction zone for CQB training, Oil refineries, Trainyards....I had the most fun on a shooter I'd had up until that point. I was hoping to recover some of that, but the wind is right out of my sales.

    In Closing, This game is a major disappointment to any Vegas fan who expected more.    … Expand
  75. jesusjones1024
    Dec 26, 2015
    4
    This game has low expectations for itself and fails to reach even those.

    Pro: Tactical Teamwork Con: Everything else. Is this what we expect for $60? It functions like Insurgency's autistic cousin. It tries to cover up it's horrible graphics with the most extreme case of Motion Blur I've ever seen. The AI will shoot you through walls with 100% accuracy (then instantly troll you    This game has low expectations for itself and fails to reach even those.

    Pro: Tactical Teamwork

    Con: Everything else.

    Is this what we expect for $60? It functions like Insurgency's autistic cousin. It tries to cover up it's horrible graphics with the most extreme case of Motion Blur I've ever seen. The AI will shoot you through walls with 100% accuracy (then instantly troll you with a killcam). Guns have no recoil/uniqueness. You can only destroy objects/walls marked as destructable (not some Red Faction contender as lauded). Servers plainly don't work. No single player. 40% of the unique content requires microtransactions AT LAUNCH, feels like Game of War. R6 bucks my a $$.

    Multiplayer had the potential to be a fun $20 game on it's own, but it's lack of competition modes other than Attack/Defend make it absurdly over priced.

    A total bust. Thanks for the refund Steam.    … Expand
  76. eXcels
    Mar 21, 2016
    4
    The game itself trying to attempt a really good FPS online game. But it fails in a lot of points:
    - laggy server
    - bugs ( like drone is falling through the ground, not gaining points for victory or loss ) are just normal (after the third month of release date!) - the enemy can see you but you can't see the enemy. I was killed several times by invisible hostile players. The kill-cam    The game itself trying to attempt a really good FPS online game. But it fails in a lot of points:
    - laggy server
    - bugs ( like drone is falling through the ground, not gaining points for victory or loss ) are just normal (after the third month of release date!)
    - the enemy can see you but you can't see the enemy. I was killed several times by invisible hostile
    players. The kill-cam shows me that the enemy allegedly was standing in front of me.
    -

    It isn't worth 60$ not even the half    … Expand
  77. Jonnif1
    Jan 28, 2018
    4
    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team might be premade team even in Casual which    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game
    more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists
    As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play
    if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team
    might be premade team even in Casual which is not fair for low levels players
    and that s why people quit , but I don't wonder since is an Ubisoft game
    and I can't expect the best , in the last years I am very negative towards Ubisoft .    … Expand
  78. turitz
    Nov 19, 2019
    4
    Rainbow six siege is a Rollercoaster of Emotions. The Game is good, makes fun, has a lot of well implemented mechanics, but the Game still has its flaws that just ruin everything at least for me.

    Pros The overall Gameplay expirience is rly good Cons The hitboxes feel wanky some times, not sure if its the server that fails. The Balancing Team could be faster sometimes, There    Rainbow six siege is a Rollercoaster of Emotions. The Game is good, makes fun, has a lot of well implemented mechanics, but the Game still has its flaws that just ruin everything at least for me.

    Pros
    The overall Gameplay expirience is rly good

    Cons
    The hitboxes feel wanky some times, not sure if its the server that fails.

    The Balancing Team could be faster sometimes, There times when a Operator gets banned every Match and they need like 3 Months to do a little nerf that doesn't change anything.

    The Matchmaking and Ranked Systems are garbage and thats also why I quit the Game, there times when the Game gives us Platin enemies when we are all just Silver or lower. And a Friemd of mine who is way better than me has the same Ranked cause Rainbows Ranking System is just bad

    The Maps are also an Interesting subject, Rainbow has a lot of Maps but most of them are just trash, there are just a Handfull of Maps that are well made, but with the huge load of bad Maps u get to play around 3 of 10 Matches with a good Map    … Expand
  79. hekpuctaast
    Mar 31, 2020
    4
    Basically in this game strongly decides Donat, my PC still pulls badly, in general I will be desired by his players.
  80. CleanZodiac
    Oct 12, 2020
    4
    The game mostly is not fun. First is that there's too many toxic people and reporting doesn't do anything, if someone leaves you can't also report them, the vote kick is also super rigged since if you find a toxic 4 stack you basically become their slaves because the vote kick system basically gets rid of the minority since 4 people have to vote to kick you, making solo queuing not funThe game mostly is not fun. First is that there's too many toxic people and reporting doesn't do anything, if someone leaves you can't also report them, the vote kick is also super rigged since if you find a toxic 4 stack you basically become their slaves because the vote kick system basically gets rid of the minority since 4 people have to vote to kick you, making solo queuing not fun sometimes. The game takes way too much time to load for everyone. I understand its a part of the game and I'm not saying to remove the ability to do it but spawn peaking is annoying to deal with and its super annoying to deal with defenders who jump off a second floor or they just exit the building and kill you with almost no risk since there's a 3 second countdown for the spawn peeker to only get spotted, the countdown can be reset if you go inside making it very easy to abuse the system. There are ways to deal with it, like droning certain areas, using long ranged operators like Glaz and Kali, but it just makes the game unfun having to constantly watching every peekable area so my team doesn't get killed. Sometimes the bullet don't register so headshots are kind of wonky, inconsistent sometimes and the game has several bugs but Ubisoft just wants to add more operator into a game with enough diversity for money, instead of actually fixing the terrible game.… Expand
  81. LukaMagic77
    Nov 14, 2021
    4
    If Ubisoft's studios release multiplayer games in the future, it's safe to assume that those games will have a short lifespan. The game is run by an incompetent producer who reflects their taste in the game and can't adjust the balance properly. Therefore, it is only natural that the games made by Ubisoft-affiliated studios have a short lifespan.
  82. armiaM
    Nov 10, 2022
    4
    just cheaters and campers
    just suck community
    just teamkill
    no more content
  83. Destroyeron
    Dec 15, 2015
    3
    Average game. Unfortunately it is marred by being totally unresponsive. You won't see the people that kill you until you see their kill cam. Do not buy.
  84. F25Xanatos
    Dec 6, 2015
    3
    I fail to understand why Ubisoft took the direction it did. I thought during the Alpha that it was going to become something more. Instead, it seems to follow the direction most FPS out there are going and that is short term investment. Why did games for the PC support 8 player COOP in the past, but not today? I wished they had used the Unreal Engine 4. PC games are like 2nd classI fail to understand why Ubisoft took the direction it did. I thought during the Alpha that it was going to become something more. Instead, it seems to follow the direction most FPS out there are going and that is short term investment. Why did games for the PC support 8 player COOP in the past, but not today? I wished they had used the Unreal Engine 4. PC games are like 2nd class citizens now. We get ports, and everyone knows how well Ubisoft makes them. Look at Hawx.

    I'm not spending 60 dollars on a game with such limited content, no dedicated servers, and a MP only focus. It's pure laziness on the developers side, and like Activision it is a stab at the PC community to force us to play the way they want us to play. In the words Jay Wilson, "You are having fun incorrectly."

    I've waited over a decade for a true sequel to the original R6 series. Takedown: Red Saber could have been that had it not played like abandonware from day one.

    If Ubisoft really cared about the Tom Clancy series they would have taken a look at GroundBranch.    … Expand
  85. jokerdeus
    Jan 26, 2016
    3
    Rainbow six : Siege is an expensive multiplayer game with a very, very, very, very bad matchmaking system and netcode for the servers. The game is fundamentally good but you won't be able to enjoy properly because of its HUGE matchmaking issues and server issues. It has been released since several months now, and Ubisoft doesn't change anything, that means that they won't ever changeRainbow six : Siege is an expensive multiplayer game with a very, very, very, very bad matchmaking system and netcode for the servers. The game is fundamentally good but you won't be able to enjoy properly because of its HUGE matchmaking issues and server issues. It has been released since several months now, and Ubisoft doesn't change anything, that means that they won't ever change anything about it. RIP rainbow six siege, nice try.… Expand
  86. Gruni
    Dec 30, 2015
    3
    In theory, this game is finally a new approach to online gaming. However, the sad truth is that Ubisoft simply can't satisfy online gamers due to a **** netcode, a bad foundation for a multiplayer game and a truly **** up price policy.

    This game should've been either a free2play title or a 20-25€/$ download title, not a full fledged 60€/$ full-price game with 29€/$ season pass attached    In theory, this game is finally a new approach to online gaming. However, the sad truth is that Ubisoft simply can't satisfy online gamers due to a **** netcode, a bad foundation for a multiplayer game and a truly **** up price policy.

    This game should've been either a free2play title or a 20-25€/$ download title, not a full fledged 60€/$ full-price game with 29€/$ season pass attached to it.

    The matchmaking simply does not work. There is no server browser. There are 10 maps (that play exactly the same whether you play at day or night, since the core of the gameplay is focused on the INSIDE of the buildings) - 20 characters to chose from, that can't go through any progress, as there simply is no progression ingame. That's it. Roughly 3 modifications that are basically all the same and once you have unlocked everything (took me 20 hours for all modifications + all operators) then you're done with the game basically.    … Expand
  87. Fallor
    Dec 7, 2015
    3
    You can buy this. If price is about 20-25 euro. If you have friends(a team of 3 at least) - you can buy this for 35. If you love pain - you can buy it for full price and enjoy **** connection, matchmaking, lags, unsynchronized players (just like Battlefield, only worse!). And you can buy season pass for Windows hanging bugs (prepare your restart button). Tough it can be funny sometimes.You can buy this. If price is about 20-25 euro. If you have friends(a team of 3 at least) - you can buy this for 35. If you love pain - you can buy it for full price and enjoy **** connection, matchmaking, lags, unsynchronized players (just like Battlefield, only worse!). And you can buy season pass for Windows hanging bugs (prepare your restart button). Tough it can be funny sometimes. If you are not playing with a team of imbecile randoms, who don't do ****… Expand
  88. fevid
    Oct 25, 2016
    3
    Great Gameplay, Aweful Bugs, I Dont Want to Say What Bugs are Cause they aint few!
    But They Are Super annoying and piss me off, Most of The Times its Unplayable cause of Bugs!
    sometimes i cant aim, im system is glitchy and i got to restart the game and hope it fixed! Hate Ubisoft and all Its Games, Dont Buy anything from Ubisoft!!!!! Pity that i paid them to get this crap game specialy    Great Gameplay, Aweful Bugs, I Dont Want to Say What Bugs are Cause they aint few!
    But They Are Super annoying and piss me off, Most of The Times its Unplayable cause of Bugs!
    sometimes i cant aim, im system is glitchy and i got to restart the game and hope it fixed!
    Hate Ubisoft and all Its Games, Dont Buy anything from Ubisoft!!!!!
    Pity that i paid them to get this crap game specialy that i bought GOLD!    … Expand
  89. bagolykiraly
    Jan 4, 2017
    3
    Well where should i start?Hmm maybe with the netcode because its buggy as hell.Or with the fact that the servers are unstable and the game is annoying to play with.Lets talk about the graphics well its medicore at best but dont add anything to the games appeal.The community is toxic and plagged with hackers.Or with the balance of the game.The character design and their abilities are reallyWell where should i start?Hmm maybe with the netcode because its buggy as hell.Or with the fact that the servers are unstable and the game is annoying to play with.Lets talk about the graphics well its medicore at best but dont add anything to the games appeal.The community is toxic and plagged with hackers.Or with the balance of the game.The character design and their abilities are really cool and awsome but in reality some are overpowered and some are usless or just weak in general.Im not a big fan of "realistic" fps games but i played with arma and other fps games that required a lot of skill to play(im not saying that im a pro at fps videogames).In this game you dont need that much skill but a **** ton of luck because sometimes your bullets kill people instantly but usually they wonder off in to the other side of the room where is no enemy to be found and there is so many "spots" on the map where you get insta killed and you dont have a chance to counter.The maps are horrible and boring after a couple of rounds.Overall i dont know what ubisoft wanted with this game they tried to make a hardcore reallistic fps game but they failed miserably with mechanics which are for the call of duty type gamers.I cant recommend this game at all. (sorry for bad english not a native speaker)… Expand
  90. Patrickyayo
    Mar 14, 2017
    3
    HUGE disappointment if you were looking for something similar to any of the games in this franchise, It's okay if you want something extremely repetitive and lacking any depth or strategy.

    This should've been RS Patriots.
  91. ImperialnySPQR
    Dec 5, 2018
    3
    A week ago I would certainly gave this game 9/10 to 10/10 I have over 500 hours on multiplayer but sadly the game devs are doing nothing to repair tons of bugs that are showing after each update, and after only few games now I saw a lot of new bugs, servers instability, plus new operators are directly how you shouldn't make multiplayer characters
  92. 13sins
    Mar 29, 2019
    3
    (take into consideration that i have played this game since it came out and i have over 3000 hours of game play)
    -graphics are good ( even better with the texture pack)
    -the idea is good but the execution is not as good -the mechanics are solid ( with the exception of some bugs) but the reason that i gave this game such a bad score is because despite its good qualities it keeps getting    (take into consideration that i have played this game since it came out and i have over 3000 hours of game play)
    -graphics are good ( even better with the texture pack)
    -the idea is good but the execution is not as good
    -the mechanics are solid ( with the exception of some bugs)
    but the reason that i gave this game such a bad score is because despite its good qualities it keeps getting worst with each update.
    hackers are found in 3 matches out of 10 ( the difference of being able to reach diamond and staying plat 2 in rank)
    hitboxes are just broken and there are so many exploits (crouch spam,lean spam,sliding, glitches)
    and they are not doing anything about it, and every time they did something about it, it just made things even worst.
    i gave it a lot of chances to redeem it self but i cant recommend this game as its current stage.    … Expand
  93. markdude701
    Apr 11, 2020
    3
    The gameplay is fair and entertaining for about an hour or two.
    I bought this game for $60 when it was released years ago. A few years, it's a lot worse of a game. The microtransations are the biggest turn off for me. 1/3 of the game is locked behind a pay wall or requires 200+ hours of game time to "purchase". You earn a currency each round game, which is close to 1% of what is required    The gameplay is fair and entertaining for about an hour or two.
    I bought this game for $60 when it was released years ago. A few years, it's a lot worse of a game. The microtransations are the biggest turn off for me. 1/3 of the game is locked behind a pay wall or requires 200+ hours of game time to "purchase". You earn a currency each round game, which is close to 1% of what is required to unlock a new character without any form of customization without paying. Stay away from this money pit.    … Expand
  94. Yagoda123
    Aug 8, 2021
    3
    А когда-то это была хорошая игра. Теперь же мы играем в шутер для киберспортсменов-пидарасо-негров с одинаковыми пушками у почти каждого нового опера. А все ульты оперов похерены тем что любой другой опер может взять пропил как гаджет.А когда-то это была хорошая игра. Теперь же мы играем в шутер для киберспортсменов-пидарасо-негров с одинаковыми пушками у почти каждого нового опера. А все ульты оперов похерены тем что любой другой опер может взять пропил как гаджет.
  95. BFG-1337
    Apr 13, 2021
    3
    "Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six" IS IT F*** AHAHAHAHA
    First of all, nope, this isn't Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six
    Second of all, this game sucks Gameplay: Camping simulator PVP: Camping simulator Maps: Camping simulator Graphics: Camping simulator Did i say this game is a camping simulator? But seriously now, I had a bit of fun back in 2017, i tried it recently and I can say    "Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six" IS IT F*** AHAHAHAHA
    First of all, nope, this isn't Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six

    Second of all, this game sucks

    Gameplay: Camping simulator

    PVP: Camping simulator

    Maps: Camping simulator

    Graphics: Camping simulator

    Did i say this game is a camping simulator?

    But seriously now, I had a bit of fun back in 2017, i tried it recently and I can say I'd rather watch paint dry then play this game again, mostly because of how spoiled the whole thing is now.
    Too many operators, too many useless little gadgets

    Here one flaw the developers can't fix: community is awful, everyone is just "hardcore" and everyone wants to be the next esports player, while they all suck because no one even knows where right or left is.

    Its what it is, I wouldn't mind this game's existence if it was called "Tactical bomb squad" or some ****    … Expand
  96. defenz
    Aug 8, 2021
    3
    ⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣
  97. BigSleeezzz
    Dec 6, 2021
    3
    I started playing this game in late 2016 which is about a year after its release. I was having lots of fun since I was playing a five stack with friends and we tried to approach each round like a true tactical shooter. I quickly realised that this game is nowhere near a tactical shooter and is basically COD on steroids but with worse hit register, gunplay and insane peekers advantage.I started playing this game in late 2016 which is about a year after its release. I was having lots of fun since I was playing a five stack with friends and we tried to approach each round like a true tactical shooter. I quickly realised that this game is nowhere near a tactical shooter and is basically COD on steroids but with worse hit register, gunplay and insane peekers advantage. Referring to the gunplay, bad players are rewarded because of the instant kill headshot mechanic. I've lost count of how many times I have died because someone couldn't control their spray and randomly shot my head. At the same time very good aimers are rewarded with this mechanic, it allows them to dominate the opponents by one-shotting them with any weapon.
    Secondly the desync between game clients and servers is simply ridiculous for a fast paced, competitive first person shooter. If you've never played this game, prepare to be shot at when the enemy hasn't even peeked at you yet on your screen. Also remember that even though you shot your opponent at least 5 times and have seen blood splatter all over the floor, it doesn't mean he has been hit at least once.
    It's been 6 years since the release of this game and I still feel like it's in beta stage. Every time a new update comes out some things get fixed, but more importantly more things get broken, more bugs, game breaking glitches. In 2019 I noticed this game does not want to have a future so I quit playing until about a month ago. I came back to this game only to find out that nothing has been done to the most critical issues. And now the cheaters: the game runs a battleye anticheat which is hardly doing anything. I've seen multiple cheaters at gold-platinum as well as at diamond-champion.
    The game is in a very bad state, players are leaving, pros are coming over to valorant and Ubisoft decided to move most of their dev team to the new extraction game instead of fixing siege. If the most popular siege content creators leave for any new games then I can officially call it dead.
    If only Ubisoft decided to stick to the original tactical shooter feel of the game and not the "cod on steroids with lots of microtransactions and pixel peeks" it would've been so much better. Well it's too late for it now, I've wasted around a 1000 hours fighting the game and not my opponents.    … Expand
  98. DemonLordNTR
    Jun 5, 2022
    3
    Old, outdated game from 2015. It's fun to play, if you can ignore the sweaty community and hackers. And if you can camp and hold a corner for 5 minutes without falling asleep or thinking about what you are doing with your life, then you're good.
  99. VeioBrabo
    Mar 21, 2022
    3
    Mesmos bugs há mais de 2 anos, descaso com a comunidade, falta de mercado entre players e itens extremamente caros. Ubisoft seguindo o péssimo exemplo da EA. Mais um game que você deveria evitar.
  100. Xari
    Mar 24, 2016
    2
    Atrocious networking, I run into all kinds of NAT and weird connection issues that I do not have in any other multiplayer games. What is up with never being able to join friends' squads but they can join mine anyway? Add on top the random crashes and I've just given up. What a waste of a potentially great game.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PC Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
16
#16 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 37
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 37
  3. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 3, 2016
    86
    An excellent and innovative breath of fresh air. The more I play, the more I like. I hope this is new role model for shooters to come. [Jan 2016]
  2. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    70
    Siege’s multiplayer mode with its hectic pace and unpredictability seems to have a huge e-sport potential but with random teammates is often unplayable. [01/2016, p.52]
  3. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Jan 20, 2016
    80
    Unfortunately, there aren’t that many maps available, but each one of them has lots of details and alternate routes, like basements and balconies. Even the airplane is much more complex than the archetypical “long tube with seats.” [Issue#205, p.48]
See all critic reviews »