Tactical Intervention

 PC
User Score
6.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 121 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 53 out of 121
  2. Mixed: 26 out of 121
  3. Negative: 42 out of 121

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. halosis
    Oct 12, 2013
    3
    I find that tactical intervention is quite unstable as it has stop responding multiple times, crashed etc. Also the one thing also the pay to win. One of the most unbalancing payment models to go for this leads to unbalancing game play and quite the hateful community. overall similar to black light. it was a fairly decent idea in all honesty done wrong and coded pathetically.
  2. Earthykiller127
    Oct 23, 2013
    0
    Tactical The gameplay is crap, the only thing players care about is the garbage you have to pay for, the game is just a very poorly made copy of CS:S and is garbage. Don't play it. I'd rather play a 1992 game.
  3. bigsilverhotdog
    Sep 6, 2013
    0
    Buggy, laggy, horribly ugly, unoptimized, unbalanced, freemium pay-to-win cashgrab garbage. The interface is a war crime. Server list doesn't display ping times so you never know before you connect. Hit detection is very, very erratic. Sometimes it feels perfect, other times it's hilariously bad. All modes are essentially unplayable due to constant client lag and stutter, even with 20 pingBuggy, laggy, horribly ugly, unoptimized, unbalanced, freemium pay-to-win cashgrab garbage. The interface is a war crime. Server list doesn't display ping times so you never know before you connect. Hit detection is very, very erratic. Sometimes it feels perfect, other times it's hilariously bad. All modes are essentially unplayable due to constant client lag and stutter, even with 20 ping on a beastly rig. The game's reason for existence becomes very clear a few minutes after you start playing for the first time: you start with almost no guns and no items (not even grenades) and everything has to be unlocked with long sessions of grinding or directly with cash. I estimate you could unlock 1 gun permanently for every 70~ hours played that's how slow it is. Obviously they want you to pony up and spend, oh to take one example, 10 dollars merely to unlock one single gun. Insulting. With so many playable, modern freemium games available, there's no reason to even bother looking at this laughably dated cashgrab.… Expand
  4. HazardXMediaz
    Oct 8, 2013
    4
    I really want to like this game. It seems so perfect. Map destruction, epic gunfights with cars and tactical gameplay. But it does not play as epicly as it looks in the screenshots. The graphics are quite dated, counter strike gameplay is completely gone except for the fact that you can't aim down sights, and the game is just not satisfying or rewarding. This sounded great in theory, butI really want to like this game. It seems so perfect. Map destruction, epic gunfights with cars and tactical gameplay. But it does not play as epicly as it looks in the screenshots. The graphics are quite dated, counter strike gameplay is completely gone except for the fact that you can't aim down sights, and the game is just not satisfying or rewarding. This sounded great in theory, but it did not do good in the field. Do not waste your space on your hard drive with this game. There are numerous better free to plays out there that you can really sink your teeth into. HazardXMedia Rating: 4/10.… Expand
  5. mantoothbear
    Nov 14, 2013
    0
    Well i just finished playing "Tactical Intervention" and i am sad to say it was bad, i really wanted it to be something i could keep playing for years, i was wrong, anyway its basically budget version of COD, if your missing CSS just play that and don't waste your time
  6. LemonsGood
    Oct 27, 2013
    3
    A nice concept but unfortunately this game is plagued with mediocre gameplay, a hideous UI, generally standard level design, and the typical "pay-to-win" feeling that comes with many free games. To make it worse this game is incredibly buggy and is absurdly dated. Nothing about this feels how a modern FPS should.
  7. electro303
    Nov 21, 2013
    0
    This game is terrible. The graphics are shoddy, the animation choppy, and it's just a terrible game. There are better titles out there--don't waste your time or money playing poorly made games.
  8. DatGamingCritic
    Nov 18, 2013
    4
    Tactical Intervention is a FPS which uses the source engine. This game is in a state of Needs A Update. It's okay but I would expect a lot more from the person who gave us CS-1.7 and CS:Source. Yes the person who made Counter-Strike made this mess. I think the man was trying to stick to EVERYTHING LOOK 2004 OTHER WISE I KILL YOU! However there is just 1 mission that makes up for this game.Tactical Intervention is a FPS which uses the source engine. This game is in a state of Needs A Update. It's okay but I would expect a lot more from the person who gave us CS-1.7 and CS:Source. Yes the person who made Counter-Strike made this mess. I think the man was trying to stick to EVERYTHING LOOK 2004 OTHER WISE I KILL YOU! However there is just 1 mission that makes up for this game. That's why it's a 4. MISSION HIGHWAY. A mission about traveling round in glitchy cars bashing the FBI while shooting out a window at some on coming traffic. It is stupid fun. The driving is stale and the gamemode also becomes stale after a while which is a same. Although it does try to mix up the matches. Though it does now work to well.

    Overall
    -Bad Graphics
    -Glitchy Gameplay
    -Stupidly Fun Highway Mission
    Score 46/100    … Expand
  9. NiBoIL
    Nov 28, 2013
    1
    Tactical Intervention Possibly the worst recent shooter game.
    The game was said to succeed Counter-Strike, however all it does is giving you an early 2000's style graphics and gameplay that copies other Free to play shooters.
    The only way to make it better is to turn it into a blocky world like Ace of spades. I would say that it's at least an 'okay' game for those who want an FPS    Tactical Intervention Possibly the worst recent shooter game.
    The game was said to succeed Counter-Strike, however all it does is giving you an early 2000's style graphics and gameplay that copies other Free to play shooters.
    The only way to make it better is to turn it into a blocky world like Ace of spades.
    I would say that it's at least an 'okay' game for those who want an FPS experience for free, however if you want to have the full Tactical Intervention experience you will need to buy weapons for real money, and it won't stay forever anyway.
    Not to mention how buggy it is.    … Expand
  10. S4l3m
    Dec 18, 2013
    0
    No. Sorry. I love CS and all the free to play stuff that came with it. Also all unreal mods. Even the ones. But this ist a MESS.

    It is trying to be too much at the same time.
  11. Artjomix
    Sep 27, 2014
    1
    Игра очень качественая толька у разрабочиков очень плахая логика нахрена там нужны лобби и можна играть там толька кагда 4 человека зайдут на сервер это глупо очень я не навижу игру лиш за это и все со мной согласны кому нравится ждать несколька часов кагда на сервер зайдут ещо 3 человека надо так как в counter-strike и многие хотят играть 1 vs 1 а там нужно именно 4 карочи игра оченьИгра очень качественая толька у разрабочиков очень плахая логика нахрена там нужны лобби и можна играть там толька кагда 4 человека зайдут на сервер это глупо очень я не навижу игру лиш за это и все со мной согласны кому нравится ждать несколька часов кагда на сервер зайдут ещо 3 человека надо так как в counter-strike и многие хотят играть 1 vs 1 а там нужно именно 4 карочи игра очень крутая но надо мозги ломать чтоб поиграть в неёо и много ждать а чтоб по играть 1 vs 1 там нельзя.… Expand
  12. Young_Nacho
    Oct 6, 2015
    4
    This game is just... idek what to say. Without a doubt this game is terrible when played seriously, especially since parts of it a really broken. Everything from the graphics to the gameplay just isn't good, and it feels really clunky. But something about games like this just seem to be fun. It's fun to play with your friends on a game that's laughably bad, it just makes for a funnyThis game is just... idek what to say. Without a doubt this game is terrible when played seriously, especially since parts of it a really broken. Everything from the graphics to the gameplay just isn't good, and it feels really clunky. But something about games like this just seem to be fun. It's fun to play with your friends on a game that's laughably bad, it just makes for a funny experience. If your going into this game wanting to play seriously, its not gonna be fun. The game is just not fun to play seriously, especially when there are SOOOO many better games that have similar concepts. If you have a group of friends who want to get a bunch of laughs and go full try-hard mode on a broken game, this is the game you want to be playing. Especially since it's free.… Expand

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
47

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 7 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 7
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 7
  3. Negative: 5 out of 7
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Oct 28, 2013
    40
    Glimmers of that CS charm, but needs another year in development and local servers before standing alongside such heavyweights. [Nov 2013, p.91]
  2. SpazioGames
    Oct 17, 2013
    45
    Tactical Intervention has been proclaimed as the new Counter Strike's successor. That was the expectation. Reality give us a game that is simply not worthy to be compared to the Counter Stike brand, because of the extremely buggy technical structure, the "free-to-PAY" attitude, and some anachronistic gameplay choices. We won't say it's completely rubbish, it can be even fun for some minutes, indeed, but we don't think we will spend any other time (or money) again on it.
    Read full review
  3. GameStar
    Oct 7, 2013
    48
    It feels rushed and it's probably only good as a reminder how unapproachable team shooters have been at the turn of the millennium.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »