User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 9 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 9
  2. Negative: 2 out of 9
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Robert
    Sep 8, 2003
    0
    Wow, I have never seen a more cheaply made game in my life. I just recently went from a 500Mhz pentium III computer with 384Mb of RAM and a GEFORCE4 TI4200, which barely ran the game, not at all in street mode. To a 2.4GHz computer with 512MB of RAM and the same graphics card, and it barely runs it better, you would think that a computer like mine would run anything without a hitch, and Wow, I have never seen a more cheaply made game in my life. I just recently went from a 500Mhz pentium III computer with 384Mb of RAM and a GEFORCE4 TI4200, which barely ran the game, not at all in street mode. To a 2.4GHz computer with 512MB of RAM and the same graphics card, and it barely runs it better, you would think that a computer like mine would run anything without a hitch, and it does, except for this and it runs it like CRAP!!! If you have a 3.2GHz computer with 3G's of RAM and the top of the line 256MB graphics card, you MAY get by, or if you can handle the slow loading time and choppy frame rates. If the previously stated do not apply to you... STAY AWAY FROM THIS GAME! Expand
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 3 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 3
  2. Negative: 2 out of 3
  1. Clearly one of the most flawed games of 2002. So flawed, in fact, that a 30MB patch has already been released, and another is on the way.
  2. The graphics and the sound both are very good. A very different interface system makes it fairly easy to move from one area to the next. The game actually has a great amount of depth to it and the "town" is quite large.
  3. PC Gamer
    42
    SL's graphics engine is by far the buggiest and most poorly optimized that I've seen in years, with enough frame-rate bottlenecks, clipping, draw-through, and CD-access pauses to leave you gasping in your chair. [Mar 2003, p.91]