User Score
8.3

Generally favorable reviews- based on 6 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 6
  2. Negative: 0 out of 6

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Jan 13, 2016
    5
    Very slow graphics ( using a new Surface Book i7).
    Not nearly as good as some other games that allow you to move around the map quickly
    Way too expensive for a game that looks like it was produced 10 years ago
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 3 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 3
  2. Negative: 0 out of 3
  1. Jul 1, 2016
    65
    The fans of the historical strategy and tactical games can find entertainment here. Its level of detail, both on the armies and the settings, and its multiplayer are the strong points. However, there are still some optimization issues and it is too demanding for the casual player.
  2. Mar 16, 2016
    70
    a game that had a lot of potential, and while it doesn’t quite live up to all of it, it’s still a very intricate, detailed attempt at bringing to life one of the biggest battles of that period.
  3. Jan 8, 2016
    70
    Not an RTS for everyone: it's incredibly deep and complex, and the technical side is filled with small issues. Just for hardcore RTS fans.