R.U.S.E.

 PC
User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 207 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 146 out of 207
  2. Mixed: 42 out of 207
  3. Negative: 19 out of 207
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Ztride
    Dec 22, 2011
    6
    This is a very unique WWII game, and a very unique strategy game aswell for that matter. Unlike other RTS games, such as Starcraft, the game focuses heavily on real strategy (instead of multi-tasking, base building and the studying of stats) aswell aas deception. My problem with it however, is partly the lack of content (few maps, worthless singleplayer etc), but mainly how unbalanced theThis is a very unique WWII game, and a very unique strategy game aswell for that matter. Unlike other RTS games, such as Starcraft, the game focuses heavily on real strategy (instead of multi-tasking, base building and the studying of stats) aswell aas deception. My problem with it however, is partly the lack of content (few maps, worthless singleplayer etc), but mainly how unbalanced the game is, often it is just about building the most amount of tanks, back it up with some artillery and charge the enemy. Deception and planning doesn't really make that much difference, atleast not in the games I've played. A mediocre game overall.… Expand
  2. robohunterx
    Sep 11, 2010
    7
    A very good game, if your looking for up front, in your face combat. Mixes the concepts of Land, Air, and Support units all under your control. There's just one fall-back, if you end up being able to rush your enemy, it's 100% not fun. Of course some call this a method or winning, I just call it an annoyance. When I was playing my friend, I found many "Rush" tactics that can not beA very good game, if your looking for up front, in your face combat. Mixes the concepts of Land, Air, and Support units all under your control. There's just one fall-back, if you end up being able to rush your enemy, it's 100% not fun. Of course some call this a method or winning, I just call it an annoyance. When I was playing my friend, I found many "Rush" tactics that can not be stopped. For example, if one builds multiple airfields, he can keep spamming the airborne infantry squads to rush an enemy base. Also if your advisary keeps building an armor base for example, he's able to keep mass producing units until you break through. Aside from the massive rushing tactics, this game is a great new mix, I just wont be buying it anytime soon until the price tag drops.… Expand
  3. robertjweber
    Sep 12, 2010
    6
    Ruse is a multiplayer game. Coupled with the fact that there are no games online in Australia (it shouldnt matter where im from)... Im suspecting some sort of region locked BS after seeing ~3000 people playing RUSE now on steam.

    I paid 65 bucks for this game online and I wish i could return it and purchase it again when there are more games (i dont care how its done). Know this before    Ruse is a multiplayer game. Coupled with the fact that there are no games online in Australia (it shouldnt matter where im from)... Im suspecting some sort of region locked BS after seeing ~3000 people playing RUSE now on steam.

    I paid 65 bucks for this game online and I wish i could return it and purchase it again when there are more games (i dont care how its done).

    Know this before purchasing!    … Expand
  4. Muckknuckle
    Sep 19, 2010
    6
    It's decent, i guess. I played the Beta on steam, and I really expected more from it, as the resource collecting isnt intuitive, all of your units are way too slow to defend any kind of supply center not near your base, and furthermore keeping a large army up in the field takes alot of micro-management and repeatedly training units, which sucks. The use of ruses didnt really help much, asIt's decent, i guess. I played the Beta on steam, and I really expected more from it, as the resource collecting isnt intuitive, all of your units are way too slow to defend any kind of supply center not near your base, and furthermore keeping a large army up in the field takes alot of micro-management and repeatedly training units, which sucks. The use of ruses didnt really help much, as the ones that i used did nothing against the AI. The graphics are awesome, though. This game has a good concept, but it should be integrated with more easily-accessible RTS gameplay mechanics for it to be a good game.… Expand
  5. Texlar
    Sep 14, 2010
    5
    Good idea, bad implementation. I first saw the beta several months ago. I admit I liked the idea of yet another WW2 RTS, but after trying the beta, I was not impressed. Last week I tried the demo and was impressed enough to buy the game. But I am no longer impressed. The idea is sound. Build your units and crush the enemy. The units are well-chosen, but I found that they had maddeningGood idea, bad implementation. I first saw the beta several months ago. I admit I liked the idea of yet another WW2 RTS, but after trying the beta, I was not impressed. Last week I tried the demo and was impressed enough to buy the game. But I am no longer impressed. The idea is sound. Build your units and crush the enemy. The units are well-chosen, but I found that they had maddening limitations. Why can't anti-tank units not even FIRE on infantry? I understand the need for balance, but an anti-tank position being destroyed by grenade throwing infantrymen just standing there does not make sense. The "gimmick" of the game, the RUSEs are poorly implemented. They hide or reveal friendly/enemy units and offer some help, but not a lot. I found that I did not use them unless ordered in the campaign. And the campaign itself is another problem. I don't even want to begin with the historical inaccuracies (not to mention an officer wearing Captain's bars to whom a Major is apparently superior) Leaving the campaign aside, the skirmish maps offer some fun, but the AI is either too smart or too dumb. Your team AI grabs all your supply depots and enemy AI seems to have heavy tanks immediately. But that's just my opinion. If you want to try a moderately different recent RTS that is not SC2, it may be worth it. I have not played multiplayer, so I have no comments on that.… Expand
  6. Nandoalbando
    Jan 5, 2013
    6
    Ruse has nice graphics, but the mechanics of the game, based on the missions, it is too "strong." The feeling is that have to respond to the orders of the PC to complete the missions, instead that >your troops> to respond to your orders. It lacks of freedom to achieve the objectives of the mission in your own way.
  7. PLANETX
    Mar 13, 2012
    5
    The best way to explain RUSE is that it's a fun game but not one to keep you interested. It has quite a bit of originality but nothing special to make it stand out. It has balance issues, limited selection, but has a simple concept, is easy to learn, and is fun to play now and then. I wouldn't say it's a masterpiece, but I wouldn't say it's a failure either. Overall it's a good game andThe best way to explain RUSE is that it's a fun game but not one to keep you interested. It has quite a bit of originality but nothing special to make it stand out. It has balance issues, limited selection, but has a simple concept, is easy to learn, and is fun to play now and then. I wouldn't say it's a masterpiece, but I wouldn't say it's a failure either. Overall it's a good game and fun, though I wouldn't recommend purchasing it unless you think you'll end up playing a good amount of it.… Expand

Awards & Rankings

64
#64 Best PC Game of 2010
37
#37 Most Discussed PC Game of 2010
38
#38 Most Shared PC Game of 2010

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
76

Generally favorable reviews - based on 33 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 33
  2. Mixed: 12 out of 33
  3. Negative: 0 out of 33
  1. Absolute Games
    Jan 15, 2011
    67
    If you're still not tired of WWII-themed RTS games, give R.U.S.E. a chance. It's a nice alternative to Order of War, but don't expect it to dethrone Company of Heroes.
    Read full review
  2. PC Format
    Dec 25, 2010
    86
    Appealing to both the single and multiplayer real-time strategist, although R.U.S.E. will be a hard mistress online. [Issue#245, p.102]
  3. Level7.nu
    70
    Ruse is very entertaining both in its campaign and multiplayer mode. Unfortunately the story is not very engaging and feels unnecessary. The depth of the game is what makes it different from the rest of the pack. There are lots of room for clever moves and lengthy battles.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »