- Publisher: Reef Entertainment
- Release Date: Feb 21, 2014
- Also On: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
User Score
Overwhelming dislike- based on 329 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 31 out of 329
-
Mixed: 11 out of 329
-
Negative: 287 out of 329
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Feb 21, 2014
-
Feb 21, 2014Just in case you are wondering, the 4 is for Rambo himself, not this outdated piece of junk game that maybe would have been cool in 2001. Thanks once again for ruining Rambo!
-
Nov 14, 2019Oh man, this game...see Angry Joe Review and you will save you time and money for sure.
-
May 7, 2014
-
Dec 27, 2014I don't really have a problem with a game that is a rail shooter. But a game that is technically flawed in its graphics and audio departments and that is BAD if compared to other rail shooters... yes, with this I have a problem. Rail shooters can be awesome. Anyone who played House of the Dead or Time Crisis may have fond memories. But Rambo: The Video Game? Yeah, not so much...
-
Jan 1, 2017
-
Sep 10, 2015
-
Feb 21, 2014This game looks just awful and that might be something caused by the long time it took to develop this game but it's still fun for an on-rails shooter
-
Feb 24, 2014
-
Feb 25, 2014
-
May 19, 2014
-
Nov 28, 2017This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Jun 1, 2018
-
Jun 23, 2020Sadly did not enjoy this on rail shooter, the repetition was painful. Would not recommend.
-
Feb 21, 2014Pretty much anyone would easily have done a better job making this game. Demanding money for this is shameful and pathetic. The graphics are two generations outdated and the gameplay is lousy.
-
Feb 23, 2014The only reason I'm giving this 1 is because it's about Rambo. A REALLY strong candidate for the worst game of 2014. Faces are terrible in this game, Ride to Hell: Retribution has better faces than this... Next time you make a Rambo game, make it FPS, not a rail shooter.
-
Feb 22, 2014if this game came out in the mid 90s it would be OK. I usually do not review games if i have not played them, but this game deserves every bad review it is getting. I have watched a few videos of the gameplay and it is really painful to watch. This can possibly be the worst game to be released in recent years.
-
Feb 23, 2014This game is terrible and I have no idea how the deloppers decided that it would be good to make a "Rambo" game a on-rails shooter.
Sad Verry Sad...... -
Dec 16, 2014This game is absolute **** It looks bad, plays bad and is VERY overpriced. ($40 for a 4 hour on-rails shooter? Bull****.) It makes the bf4 and Cod Ghosts campaigns feel like far cry in comparison.
-
Aug 7, 2015No words can express this piece of crap, probably the worst game i ever seen, discusting graphics, horrible gameplay, nothing in this game is good its just garbage, thats all. Dont waste precious money on this hideous game. A game that i will remember and have nightmares about it for being so sh ity.
-
Oct 5, 2022this game can only be a joke, it's not possible everything is broken from graphics to physics and gameplay but if it was a game for Android it would be acceptable
-
Feb 24, 2014
-
Feb 21, 2014This game fails on so many levels that it's gone beyond being comical to just plain sad.
A rail shooter, really?
The graphics look like an early PS2 game and I'm betting 90% of the budget was spent on the licencing.
Avoid like the plague! -
Feb 21, 2014Who the hell wants a rail shooter... seriously? There is a reason that nobody makes them anymore and that's because the technology has advanced to a point where we can leave bad game design mechanics where they belong...in the trash.
-
Feb 22, 2014
-
May 9, 2014This game is awful because of the price. It's such a rip off that you can only think that this is the developers plan, to screw people into the ground for a piece of crap, based on the brand association. If it was bargain basement preice, like £3.99/$5 you'd think it was ok and worth a go, with no expectations...
-
Jun 12, 20140/10. Would not play. Sucks major balls. Has no dogs. Where are the interactive fish? Majorly disappointing.
Probably needs to be burnt and buried...
Still better than Call of Duty. -
Feb 22, 2014
-
Feb 22, 2014awful, terrible, one of the worst games i have ever played, it may have worked as an android or iphone game but as a pc game, huge failure. rail shooter? in 2014? seriously? horrible controls sub par graphics, this in is right in there with ride to hell redemption.
-
Oct 21, 2014Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?Seriously?
Awards & Rankings
-
Pelit (Finland)May 11, 2014Rambo sucks major ass, but the game is actually so bad, that in some crooked way it's good. It's an interactive turd, but the transition from bad action movies to bad action games is as smooth as possible. [Apr 2014]
-
games(TM)Apr 9, 2014It's only when the game reaches Soviet-occupied Afghanistan, the weakest of the movies, that the game boasts moments of genuine enjoyment. [Issue#146, p.119]
-
Games Master UKApr 7, 2014This is not "funny bad," it's just plain abysmal. [May 2014, p.79]