Quantum Break

 PC
User Score
5.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1020 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 461 out of 1020
  2. Mixed: 214 out of 1020
  3. Negative: 345 out of 1020
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. gameking
    Jul 20, 2021
    7
    This game has an interesting story. The tv series idea is good actually. The graphics and effects are very good. The bad parts are variety of gameplay and fps drops. I played with rtx 2070 and too many times ı played with 20-35 fps.
  2. VigilanteOito
    Mar 7, 2022
    7
    Pontos positivos: Graficos, historia.
    Pontos negativos: dialogos longos e chatos, personagem muito travado.

    Se tirasse essas longas cenas de dialogos, o game seria um otimo shooter.
  3. Dariya
    Jul 2, 2021
    7
    Summary:
    Not a bad game, the graphics were good, the gameplay was nice, but the story (for me) felt unfinished and uninteresting.
  4. Zinaldo
    Aug 24, 2023
    7
    not a bad game , game story is interesting and game play is not bad either.
  5. MertAslan
    Sep 11, 2020
    7
    Quantum Break has a good story. But somewhere the game is stopped for moovies and it's kinda annoying.But same time action mechanics are great.Characters became a friend or enemy for you.Shortly there's a game what has a good story but same time bad decisions are made.
  6. LyhaMaksim
    Nov 1, 2020
    7
    Игра заслуживает внимания!

    Думаю каждый из нас читал книги или смотрел фильмы про путешествие во времени, и вспоминая былые ошибки думал: "Эх... Было бы классно вернуться в прошлое и исправить все где я накасячил". Думая об этом, вы не думали: может быть все это предначертано, все ваши действия которые вы когда-либо делали так и должны были произойти? Итак. Эта игра напрочь разрушает    Игра заслуживает внимания!

    Думаю каждый из нас читал книги или смотрел фильмы про путешествие во времени, и вспоминая былые ошибки думал: "Эх... Было бы классно вернуться в прошлое и исправить все где я накасячил". Думая об этом, вы не думали: может быть все это предначертано, все ваши действия которые вы когда-либо делали так и должны были произойти?
    Итак. Эта игра напрочь разрушает стену между фильмом и игрой, здесь вам предстоит не только любоваться мыльными красотами игровой индустрии, а еще и реальными актерами. Как вы уже могли увидеть в трейлере Remedy Entertainment на пару с Microsoft Studios сняли сериал который мы с вами будем лицезреть после каждой главы в игре.
    Что касается жанра шутер, хех, то могу вас заверить - геймплей у игры довольно динамичный, но стрелять вам придется маловато.
    Игра и вправду уникальна, мало того что игра с гениальным сюжетом, так еще и сериал в придачу, Remedy Entertainment отдали игре слишком много внимания, сделали ее неповторимой! Теперь не только у консольщиков есть "Мыльное кинцо"!

    P.S. И помните: титры не означают что игра окончена.

    Спасибо за прочтение моего обзора)
    Играйте только в хорошие игры)    … Expand
  7. flwixs
    Apr 2, 2022
    7
    Сюжет на месте, путешествия во времени не кажутся тупыми и банальными, у всех действий если какой то итоговый результат, персонажи и актеры интересные. В игре достаточно минусов за что можно ее хуесосить, но только не за таймлайны, все органично и правильно сделано на мой взгляд. Есть пару не понятных сюжетных дыр и пару странных локации, а так же идея вместить в игру сериал, но в принципеСюжет на месте, путешествия во времени не кажутся тупыми и банальными, у всех действий если какой то итоговый результат, персонажи и актеры интересные. В игре достаточно минусов за что можно ее хуесосить, но только не за таймлайны, все органично и правильно сделано на мой взгляд. Есть пару не понятных сюжетных дыр и пару странных локации, а так же идея вместить в игру сериал, но в принципе проект удачный и всем рекомендую.… Expand
  8. PenetratorGod
    Sep 2, 2023
    7
    It's definitely an underrated game. Gameplay was very enjoyable and the story was average. You should give this game a chance if you haven't played it yet.
  9. rodericrinehart
    Jan 1, 2017
    6
    I do recommend it, but with some reservations. It is only worth a sale price. It has ok gameplay, but definitely has some issues. It still has quite a few bugs and in the 15-hour playthrough, it crashed numerous times. The cover system and gunplay was ok at best. You push through it for story.

    The story itself was enjoyable and live action stuff was passable. I would've just preferred    I do recommend it, but with some reservations. It is only worth a sale price. It has ok gameplay, but definitely has some issues. It still has quite a few bugs and in the 15-hour playthrough, it crashed numerous times. The cover system and gunplay was ok at best. You push through it for story.

    The story itself was enjoyable and live action stuff was passable. I would've just preferred more interspersed in-game cinematics though. The story does an actual good job with time travel but I won't spoil the details. It adhered to how we think differences would work between changing the past and the future.    … Expand
  10. Lamp
    Nov 11, 2016
    6
    Unplayable because of horrible stutter unless VSYNC is turned off.. Runs OK on ultra with FX 6350 and RX 470 with VSYNC off only and bearable, slight tearing (mostly hovers just under 60FPS with drops to 35).

    Very commercial product, little artistic value compared to Max Payne and Alan Wake. Feels empty, e.g., there's no equivalent to Lords and Ladies; only a few, boring guns; awkward    Unplayable because of horrible stutter unless VSYNC is turned off.. Runs OK on ultra with FX 6350 and RX 470 with VSYNC off only and bearable, slight tearing (mostly hovers just under 60FPS with drops to 35).

    Very commercial product, little artistic value compared to Max Payne and Alan Wake. Feels empty, e.g., there's no equivalent to Lords and Ladies; only a few, boring guns; awkward movement of character / covertaking; graphical and movement glitches    … Expand
  11. Mallenlane
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    It’s ok, but mostly missable if I’m being honest. The story has its interesting points and the acting is generally good. The graphics are nice, but the game runs poorly even on high end hardware. The gameplay is pretty meh, run and gun with powers that are not as interesting as the onscreen effects want them to be.

    It’s certainly not as interesting as Alan Wake was.
  12. tigerskin84
    Apr 7, 2016
    6
    es un perdida de dinero!! muy mal optimizado es de los peores ports que hay de esta generacion! lo unico bueno es que tiene lindos graficos, nada mas...
  13. Hersir
    Oct 10, 2017
    6
    Pro:

    + Twisty plot with variations depending on forks you choose, unconventional narrative through gameplay sequences as both protagonist and antagonist but also with long live action cutscenes in between. + Nice scriptwriting, dialogues, compelling characters with decent sound acting. + Well-built environments with stunning attention to small details. + There are those upgradable    Pro:

    + Twisty plot with variations depending on forks you choose, unconventional narrative through gameplay sequences as both protagonist and antagonist but also with long live action cutscenes in between.
    + Nice scriptwriting, dialogues, compelling characters with decent sound acting.
    + Well-built environments with stunning attention to small details.
    + There are those upgradable supernatural powers you get to better deal with your enemies and circumvent environmental obstacles. Not saying they are unique though as we've seen tons of this already.
    + Some of the scenes are pretty dope, especially navigating and fighting during "frozen time" later in the game. Definitely produces a wow-effect.

    Contra:

    - Resource black hole graphics that still has quite many glitches/artifacts for its supposed quality. On my 1080 Ti and 2K resolution I had to dial down some settings for playable (>60) FPS. The game sure looks good but nothing to justify its requirements and performance.
    - Game crashes every now and then.
    - Despite the plot forks, levels are shallowly linear.
    - Shooting-related mechanic feels wrong and immersion breaking. There's that insanely strong unnatural radial bullet spread (accuracy and recoil don't work like that), range is limited on many weapons (like bullets dematerialize at some CLOSE point), obstructive aiming camera with too much parallax at close ranges where a lot of action happens (at least give the guy a laser pointer to deal with parallax problem), bullets are weak like .22LR and take a lot of time to kill both protagonist and enemies, not to mention pistol ammo is infinite (I guess spoils of black hole and time-travel techs, but seriously it's just babysitting the modern casual "untergamers" - the maps have occasional infinite ammo backpacks for resupply so why the hustle).
    - There's no stealth and melee is very limited which means the game boils down to using the sloppy shooting mechanics in all confrontations. Yeah, showing its weak side all the time.
    - Cake walk for kids, even "hard" difficulty is not hard at all. Add health regen to this problem, gone are the old sour days of Max Payne where you would twitchly search for painkillers because game didn't forgive your mistakes. There are no options to make the game challenging enough for a die hard player while it's the easiest thing to do with a simple numbers tweak. Damn, you gave the guy superpowers but his real superpower is that he eats bullets like a tank, heals like a demon and has a black hole pistol clip.

    In summa:

    Not recommended for purchase, it will lag terribly on anything below 2017 hi-end PC and it's a one-pass amusement after all - replayability despite all the plot forks is small because the core aspect of the game - shooting - is pretty bland, unsatisfying and thus repetetive like a chore, not to mention the linear level structure. It has no multiplayer anyway so you know where to get it for a free try...    … Expand
  14. MoroseTroll
    Mar 11, 2019
    6
    I haven't finished the game, and I doubt I'll ever return to it. Actually, I was gonna rate this game 8/10, but:
    1) I just *hate* checkpoint save system in every game, so I'm sorry, Remedy, minus one.
    2) The final boss fight took me two days, and yet I haven't beat it. I can't afford to spend more my time for this! The game is 3 years old, but you, Remedy, still don't understand that    I haven't finished the game, and I doubt I'll ever return to it. Actually, I was gonna rate this game 8/10, but:
    1) I just *hate* checkpoint save system in every game, so I'm sorry, Remedy, minus one.
    2) The final boss fight took me two days, and yet I haven't beat it. I can't afford to spend more my time for this! The game is 3 years old, but you, Remedy, still don't understand that there *should be* a checkpoint between the two waves of enemies? How long do I need to listen that "Forget ..." phrase? One hundred times? Two hundreds? One thousand? That's totally unacceptable! Minus one.

    Bottom line: 6/10.

    P.S. I'll never buy your next games (for example, Control) until you fix this one.    … Expand
  15. KARF4GEN
    May 10, 2018
    6
    2016 год был богат на игры со временем. Две локации в Titanfall и Dishonored были посвящены играм с ним и вот эпилогом к моде стал Квантовый разлом.
    Эта игра крутой ответ inFamous и Uncharted, мог бы быть крутым ответом не продаваясь на старте на мертворожденном Хуане и тем более сторе Мелкософт.
    Нельзя сказать, что у Квантового разлома есть какой-то хватающий с неба звезды сценарий, но    2016 год был богат на игры со временем. Две локации в Titanfall и Dishonored были посвящены играм с ним и вот эпилогом к моде стал Квантовый разлом.
    Эта игра крутой ответ inFamous и Uncharted, мог бы быть крутым ответом не продаваясь на старте на мертворожденном Хуане и тем более сторе Мелкософт.
    Нельзя сказать, что у Квантового разлома есть какой-то хватающий с неба звезды сценарий, но в целом эти интересно смотреть.
    Да, вы все верно прочли.
    В это интересно не играть, а смотреть.
    Смотреть кат-сцены, смотреть сериал, а с игрой беда.
    Скучная стрельба из одинакового оружия, скучныe локации-арены для краткосрочнjq войнушки
    Все на этом.
    Вот и весь геймлей вышел.    … Expand
  16. AlexKVideos1
    Mar 13, 2021
    6
    Damn, what a shame. This is a game I wanted to play for years, and now I finally understand why it was so poorly received. Quantum Break is an interesting idea with a relatively competent story. Yet, it all falls apart in the gameplay.

    Firstly, the mouse movement for this game is very weird. It makes the game feel like its running at a lower framerate due to a 'jitteriness' that I've    Damn, what a shame. This is a game I wanted to play for years, and now I finally understand why it was so poorly received. Quantum Break is an interesting idea with a relatively competent story. Yet, it all falls apart in the gameplay.

    Firstly, the mouse movement for this game is very weird. It makes the game feel like its running at a lower framerate due to a 'jitteriness' that I've never seen in a game before. Even when using a mod to turn off the motionblur, it doesn't fix the issue as some claimed it did. Plus, for some reason, you can't change your ADS speed, which is always lower sensitivity than your hip fire.

    Secondly, the gun play sucks. All the weapons feel like pea shooters. Some, like the assault rifle, has a ridiculous bullet spread, while the heavy pistol has insultingly harsh recoil. It feels like they did this in order to force you to use the time abilities. For a developer that made the first two Max Payne games, this gun play is insulting.

    Thirdly, movement doesn't feel good. It feels very stiff like a Rockstar game as animations take priority over pinpoint movement. Like, literally at one point, Jack would refuse to jump on boxes that the game wanted him to jump on. Seriously, how is the movement system this bad? Plus, what was the reason to remove the crotch button? Now, Jack will automatically take cover when near objects. Yet, its not always consistent leaving you vulnerable.

    Lastly, this game just runs bad. It probably didn't help that they were using an unfamiliar API, DirectX 12, then switched to DirectX 11 for the Steam release. My system is definitely getting older, but it shouldn't chug as much as it does.

    Quantum Break was an interesting idea that does decent for the story execution, but completely fails when it tries to be a game...    … Expand
  17. NightGeisha
    Jan 2, 2019
    6
    Quantum Break is a very linear story, a science fiction action-adventure third-person shooter that put us on the role of Jack Joice, to whom it was granted time manipulation powers after a failed time-machine experiment. After finishing the story in normal mode, and start replay the game again in hard, I think it's the right moment for the review of the game.

    First of all let's talk    Quantum Break is a very linear story, a science fiction action-adventure third-person shooter that put us on the role of Jack Joice, to whom it was granted time manipulation powers after a failed time-machine experiment. After finishing the story in normal mode, and start replay the game again in hard, I think it's the right moment for the review of the game.

    First of all let's talk already in game duration and "re-playability". The game is short and the ideia of replay it again its not a very attractive task, it seems unnecessary and a repetitive task. Obviously if you want to complete unfinished achievements, find all the in-game collectibles or see all the alternatives routes to the story you have to do it. But does it justify?
    The game presents an interesting idea that puts pieces of history in video, like a TV show, that completes in a very nice way the playable story. But this aspect, although an interesting concept, it kind of disguises the fact that the game is small.

    Visually the game is very good, even with the appearance blurred or de-fragmented. I was surprised by the fluidity of the game (very near the 60 fps all the time on my 1060). I had read that there were huge performance problems in the PC when the game was released, but apparently the problems were overcome.

    Overall it is a very nice gaming experience, especially for its history with all the twists, turns and "time travel loops" of a good sci-fi story. Here is small YouTube vide with the first minutes of the gameplay if you wanna check it out: https://youtu.be/qXlIjqy50g4    … Expand
  18. Munno
    Feb 27, 2019
    6
    Bad port for pc, graphics are good, plot and combat system had potential and it's fun sometimes, but the gameplay gets repetitive and boring, characters have no charisma, the narrative does note excite and it's boring to explore collectables in obvious places without anything special...
  19. kezzyhko
    Sep 1, 2020
    6
    ‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍
  20. SPARTAN-010
    Jun 6, 2021
    6
    Performance aside, this game has a very interesting story, but said story is not spared from plot holes/contrivances/conveniences, very strong characters aside from MC (guy acts like a hero when he literally kills a ton of people).

    OST is very fitting and always a pleasure to hear, acting is also top notch as you'd expect from such a cast. Gameplay is almost interesting, but it ends    Performance aside, this game has a very interesting story, but said story is not spared from plot holes/contrivances/conveniences, very strong characters aside from MC (guy acts like a hero when he literally kills a ton of people).

    OST is very fitting and always a pleasure to hear, acting is also top notch as you'd expect from such a cast.

    Gameplay is almost interesting, but it ends up just feeling like a glorified TPS, and gets old after a while.

    Overall though, the game is worth playing through, I personally enjoyed it (the first time around atleast), but isn't anything extraordinary, ending is a bit lackluster too, the tv show side of the game is innovative afaik and is serviceable.    … Expand
  21. tufekciero
    Mar 12, 2021
    6
    BRONZ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
  22. Polthank
    Mar 12, 2022
    6
    Good story , excellent graphics (clearly this adds up a lot) and a very peculiar combat . If you feel like it, buy it without hesitation.
  23. EVIL_UJIN
    Oct 15, 2022
    6
    Интересная идея совмещения сериала с игрой разбилась о неудачное, бездушное исполнение.
    Из плюсов игры можно отметить:
    + Интересная задумка, когда выбор в игре влияет на события сериала + Красивые спецэффекты и ролики на движке А вот минусов хоть отбавляй: - Скучные , одинаковые бои - Буквально 5 (!) типов противников на всю игру (обычный охранник/охранник в броне с    Интересная идея совмещения сериала с игрой разбилась о неудачное, бездушное исполнение.
    Из плюсов игры можно отметить:
    + Интересная задумка, когда выбор в игре влияет на события сериала
    + Красивые спецэффекты и ролики на движке
    А вот минусов хоть отбавляй:
    - Скучные , одинаковые бои
    - Буквально 5 (!) типов противников на всю игру (обычный охранник/охранник в броне с пулеметом/охранник в ОЧЕНЬ ТОЛСТОЙ броне/Охранник- телепортер/снайпер)
    - Однотипные , штампованные локации: Офисы, библиотека, лаборатории, стройка, склад. Так как сюжет завязан на путешествиях во времени, то, как вы понимаете, в некоторых локациях вам придется побывать по нескольку раз, что разннообразия, конечно, не прибавляет.
    -Очень запутанный сюжет с кучей несостыковок, в котором не хочется разбираться, а хочется, чтобы это все поскорее закончилось
    - Туповатый ИИ. Максимум на что способны солдаты противника -попытаться обойти со спины или кинуть гранату. ВСЕ! Противник НЕ прячется за укрытиями/ НЕ перепрыгивает через препятствия/ НЕ пригибается. Извините, но для игры 2016 года с акцентом на шутер, это просто провал. Чего стоят одни снайперы, которые НЕ двигаются со своего поста, а просто стоят и стреляют, как будто приклеены:)    … Expand
  24. ultraviper
    Sep 10, 2019
    5
    The game isn't great, but it's not bad either. The production values are top notch. The graphics are good. The story is average. The cutscenes are too long and too numerous. But the real issue is that the gameplay is just mediocre. It's a 3rd person cover shooter where you have recharging special abilities. The enemies are all dudes with guns. Every battle in the game feels exactly theThe game isn't great, but it's not bad either. The production values are top notch. The graphics are good. The story is average. The cutscenes are too long and too numerous. But the real issue is that the gameplay is just mediocre. It's a 3rd person cover shooter where you have recharging special abilities. The enemies are all dudes with guns. Every battle in the game feels exactly the same as the previous one.… Expand
  25. 21grams
    Oct 28, 2016
    5
    A WASTED POTENTIAL.

    First of all, the PC port is pretty bad. And while game maxed out looks pretty neat, yet the performance is all over the place and you need solid PC to even bother with the game. Now by default you get upscaled resolution, but the games looks quite bad with it at any settings (overly blurry and not sharp). Turning off upscaling (meaning game renders in set    A WASTED POTENTIAL.

    First of all, the PC port is pretty bad. And while game maxed out looks pretty neat, yet the performance is all over the place and you need solid PC to even bother with the game. Now by default you get upscaled resolution, but the games looks quite bad with it at any settings (overly blurry and not sharp). Turning off upscaling (meaning game renders in set resolution) basically cuts performance by half. On top of that, game feels laggy at times even at 50-60fps, while other times it feels more responsive even during fps drops.

    The game had massive potential, great idea, good core of the story are already there, but there were some bad decisions and design choices made, that hurt the game severely:
    - TV show + game - bad idea and while it's not the worst tv show out there, yet it was interrupting game flow severely.
    - Terrible gameplay design - very repetitive. Basically you do some platforming, get to an open area, beat some bullet spongy bad guys - and repeat. Now while time manipulation powers are cool to play with, gunplay ruins it all - which is very primitive, with clumsy movement and shooting controls, to the point where game doesn't even feel responsive.

    They should have do more story telling thru gameplay (now 90% of it is done in the cutscenes and notes you find thru out the game), that would make gameplay more interesting and diverse, because now you just fight exactly the same dudes over and over again in the same manner every single time and there is nothing more to it..

    It could have been great game, but Remedy chose a bad path and we've got a product which is neither a proper game, neither a proper tv show.. Too much cinematic bullcrap, when you make a game, you can't forget it's a game and it needs solid gameplay and this game doesn't have it.    … Expand
  26. ShaMana
    Jan 29, 2020
    5
    Sadly a fairly mediocre experience. Visually the game is excellent. The lighting, character models, effects all amazing.

    The story and gameplay is where it falters. Actions is a mess of confusing steps. You are presented with a number of abilities that sometimes work, sometimes don't and the responsiveness feels a bit arbitrary. You time shift next to an enemy with the intent to let him    Sadly a fairly mediocre experience. Visually the game is excellent. The lighting, character models, effects all amazing.

    The story and gameplay is where it falters. Actions is a mess of confusing steps. You are presented with a number of abilities that sometimes work, sometimes don't and the responsiveness feels a bit arbitrary. You time shift next to an enemy with the intent to let him have a shotgun blast in the face but the character ends up fiddling with the weapon and you realize the enemy has plenty of time to pump you full of led. Or the game encourages to collect some stuff around the level but only when it decides to until it randomly takes away your ability to jump and run making the collecting of something in sight impossible (restart of the level is required at that point). Shootouts at the end are a massive choir and a pain in the bum. Enemies spawn out of thin air without point or reason, just to prolong the encounter. Killing the same faceless guys over and over and over again. I guess that is the pointlessness of the situation. At some point you start thinking at the sheer number of people you slaughter just because they've hurt your feelings or something.

    The story is also sadly something that has wild ups and downs. It looks like from the beginning was never intended for them to use the faces of famous actors. They feel out of place. This is reinforced further when you encounters the two main characters from the 2014 E3 demo which models are still used as support cast now, and have superior facial expressions and emotional range, than the fairly stiff actors faces. But the biggest issues is that you never really care about them. They are nothing more than talking heads that propel the plot further. There is a mysterious force that transforms one of your best friends in to a homicide maniac, people shift allegiance after the words please and you are occasionally playing as the bad guy making decisions with ultimately fall flat as they are based on experiences that this character should have (while playing with the main protagonist). Worst bit the game doesn't bother explaining anything.

    The big finale ends with a whimper, setting up a cataclysm that is never presented, explained or detailed in any form. It's just so horrible that would make people go bananas and you gotta trust them on that.

    I guess, my expectations were way too high.

    A quick performance note: Game runs fine on a mid range hardware from 2017. Just make sure you tame your expectations and always install on an ssd, there is a lot of content streaming and it does require something faster than an ordinary spin drive.    … Expand
  27. Wiebe
    Feb 26, 2020
    5
    Bad port, the tv elements didn't really work, gameplay was ok but not great, story was predicable and the game therefore became a chore.
  28. Aelyn
    Apr 5, 2016
    5
    Pros:
    − somewhat enjoyable plot
    − overall nice graphics (but it still looks blurry as hell unless you are able to play in 4K or 4K DSR... probably with 5-15 FPS) − Aidan Gillen (Petyr Baelish from Game of Thrones) as one of the main characters (for me personally he saved this thing from being a total trainwreck) Cons: − runs like **** even at 1080p (4790K @ 4.8 GHz, GTX 980 SLI --    Pros:
    − somewhat enjoyable plot
    − overall nice graphics (but it still looks blurry as hell unless you are able to play in 4K or 4K DSR... probably with 5-15 FPS)
    − Aidan Gillen (Petyr Baelish from Game of Thrones) as one of the main characters (for me personally he saved this thing from being a total trainwreck)

    Cons:
    − runs like **** even at 1080p (4790K @ 4.8 GHz, GTX 980 SLI -- which is actually not working) and there's no exclusive fullscreen mode
    − totally unplayable on my monitor's native resolution (3440x1440)
    − it should be called "Quantum Sponge" because you need to shoot at everyone SO MUCH that it feels beyond unrealistic
    − the game was completed in less than 8 hours
    − ridiculous price (70 EUR)

    If it weren't for movie(s), I'd give it 3/10. The actual game feels like "god damn I need it to end immediately so I can watch next episode". Waste of money.

    P.S.
    English is not my native language, so please excuse me if this review hurts your eyes .__.    … Expand
  29. Shadow1
    May 21, 2016
    5
    I love it , but this game sucks deserves eg with Watch Dogs . Storyline in Watch dogs a hundred times better than Quantum Break . Quantum Break isn't bad game, but disappointed game . This game by disappointed over tuuk Watch Dogs, Watch Dogs is very very amazing game with awesome storyline and Quantum Break sucks on the background Watch Dogs and I sorry for the fact I rate Watch Dogs 7I love it , but this game sucks deserves eg with Watch Dogs . Storyline in Watch dogs a hundred times better than Quantum Break . Quantum Break isn't bad game, but disappointed game . This game by disappointed over tuuk Watch Dogs, Watch Dogs is very very amazing game with awesome storyline and Quantum Break sucks on the background Watch Dogs and I sorry for the fact I rate Watch Dogs 7 out of 10 and Quantum Break earned 5/10 .… Expand
  30. ali_arkani
    Jun 17, 2016
    5
    It's not worth your money, your time, anything! The graphics are half what they were promised. Gameplay is repetitive. AI is as dumb as a goat, even worse! The story is a cliche. Why the hell did I even played it!?
Page:

Awards & Rankings

26
#26 Most Discussed PC Game of 2016
80
#80 Most Shared PC Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
66

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 14
  3. Negative: 0 out of 14
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Nov 9, 2016
    84
    Yet another well done Remedy shooter, but I rather play the game than watch looong videos, even though they are pretty well done. [Oct 2016]
  2. Gaming Nexus
    Oct 26, 2016
    95
    Quantum Break is a great game from start to finish, and playing it with all the benefits of being on PC just make it that much better. Given that this game is coming out at a lower price point on PC as well, there's just not excuse not to get it.
    Read full review
  3. IGN Spain
    Oct 26, 2016
    78
    Quantum Break arrives to PC completely unaltered, with all its lights and shadows, but offers an improved visual experience by exploiting the highest hardware configurations and an enhanced control system thanks to the inclusion of the mouse.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »