- Publisher: Eidos Interactive
- Release Date: Mar 10, 2003
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 65 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 51 out of 65
-
Mixed: 8 out of 65
-
Negative: 6 out of 65
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Jan 23, 2014
-
AbelN.Jan 17, 2006Spectacular! one of the best strategic games I've ever seen.
-
-
MoRISFiSHApr 27, 2003This is a very good game. Action and strategy without any gestion phase... Maybe frustrating... But in solo or in Lan/Net it's pretty good.
-
-
DennisH.May 3, 2003Tactics and strategy are the parts that really shine in this game! Sneaky really pays off (ambush, etc).
-
-
AlessandroT.Dec 3, 2004Very great game. It's one of my favourites. I played through all the campaign and then I enjoyed skirmish matches and also multiplayer. The enemy AI is very intelligent and graphics are very beautiful and a bit naif. It's a gift to Roman History and to De Bello gallico!.
-
-
Jok`RdeMoMar 3, 2003This game is really great, at last one game in wich unit formations mean something. Still it is very similar to Age Of "whatever", except as I said- formations. It looks similar to Age Of Mythology but it is more historical. Shortly: must have if U like that kind of games.
-
-
frankDec 20, 2008
-
-
Jun 8, 2015
-
Jul 4, 2021It's a slow clunky 3d knock off of total war from the 2000s,just get total war Rome
Awards & Rankings
-
A little unmanageable when large opposing forces enter toe-to-toe melee combat. The front line becomes a clanging, tangled, dying mass of soldiers, and no player micromanagement is going to save them.
-
Computer Gaming WorldPraetorians never really achieves the gigantic scope of a "Total War" game, but it is more easily controlled and offers much more obvious tactical problems. [May 2003, p.95]
-
A lot of fun despite some serious missteps; the bad news is Praetorians falls far short of the greatness that it might have achieved.