Medal of Honor: Warfighter

 PC
User Score
5.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 692 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 241 out of 692
  2. Mixed: 191 out of 692
  3. Negative: 260 out of 692
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. wulfenstein
    Oct 27, 2012
    0
    Waste of money I wish I knew before spending $80 on origin.....Just wasted money, time , effort..EA your MOH time is over sto living in the playstation era....EA are just as bad as UBISOFT releasing half **** software with no support......If EA screw up DEAD SPACE 3 then I'm not gonna by there crappy products....
  2. CBZ
    Oct 25, 2012
    5
    I wanted to like this game but its impossible.
    PROS: None so far
    CONS: Maps are tiny, no cover, you will most likely get shot within 10 seconds of spawning. Cant climb on many objects and pathways are pre-designed, so no creativity to hide or jump around. Graphics are sub-par considering it has the Frostbite 2.0 engine (same as Battlefield 3) and there is no destruction AT ALL. It really    I wanted to like this game but its impossible.
    PROS: None so far
    CONS: Maps are tiny, no cover, you will most likely get shot within 10 seconds of spawning. Cant climb on many objects and pathways are pre-designed, so no creativity to hide or jump around. Graphics are sub-par considering it has the Frostbite 2.0 engine (same as Battlefield 3) and there is no destruction AT ALL. It really feels like a 2006 game with bumped up graphics (for 2006, not for today).
    I bought it last night and I'm seriously considering not playing this game again after I finish the campaign, which is also mediocre at best.

    NOT worth the $60 they are asking for.    … Expand
  3. Pericles83
    Oct 23, 2012
    3
    A generic shooter nothing more, if you are looking for something new dont buy this game. 6 hours campaign, extremely linear, hand holding game (treats you like a child). Mediocre at best.
  4. Feriatus
    Oct 26, 2012
    0
    I am a big fan of Battlefield 3 and I enjoyed Close quarters expansion a lot. I do not play singleplayer in any of this game so my experience comes only from the multiplayer part. I thought that this game will be another good addition to Battlefield since it uses the same engine and published by the same company. But don't get fooled, this is a cheap game with graphics worse than Call ofI am a big fan of Battlefield 3 and I enjoyed Close quarters expansion a lot. I do not play singleplayer in any of this game so my experience comes only from the multiplayer part. I thought that this game will be another good addition to Battlefield since it uses the same engine and published by the same company. But don't get fooled, this is a cheap game with graphics worse than Call of duty and game play even more outdated. Maps are poorly designed they look like made up of squares and very claustrophobic and unattractive environment. Invisible limitations as for example you can't climb on the cliff in the middle of the map because of the invisible wall. I was shooting from the lying position and I got shot and kill camera displayed me in standing position when I was shot also when you die it looks like there is only 1 animation for death. Controls feel unresponsive, animation of the soldiers look very bad. I do not recommend this game to anyone and I regret spending my money on it!… Expand
  5. Archivolt
    Oct 26, 2012
    5
    First of all, I would like to say that the game overall is only sub-par and will not blow your mind in any way. It runs on the Frostbyte 2 Engine, the same one used in Battlefield 3. Let's start off with the campaign. The Campaign was a (now) AAA first person standard 6-10 hour deal (If you play semi-fast/fast). There were a lot of explosions and scripted moments that reminded me of theFirst of all, I would like to say that the game overall is only sub-par and will not blow your mind in any way. It runs on the Frostbyte 2 Engine, the same one used in Battlefield 3. Let's start off with the campaign. The Campaign was a (now) AAA first person standard 6-10 hour deal (If you play semi-fast/fast). There were a lot of explosions and scripted moments that reminded me of the Call of Duty series. Sure, Call of Duty wasn't the first to invent this type of gameplay, but Call of Duty is probably the most prominent. The map designs were not shocking at all, they were sort of ugly in a way. The lighting was good, the details were there, but the layout of them just urked me. The bots would pop out of nowhere (literally I watched them spawn in thin air) and they weren't intelligent either. The "on rails" parts of the campaign were quite bland. I really hate comparing to Call of Duty (which I dislike), but the enemies just stand and shoot at you like robots. Sure that may be realistic when all you have is an AK against a Helicopter, but that doesn't make the game fun at all. It needs to be more "theatrical". I also didn't like the fact that guns were lacking in the game. I know as well that most forces have only two or three main guns and one sidearm mainly used, but the "authenticity" isn't working out here. My opinion would be simply more guns, a lot of modern guns haven't been explored in video games. Now onto the utilization of the Engine. I felt like destruction was lacking. There was less micro destruction than in Battlefield 3, and when there was micro destruction, it was tactically useless. No one hides behind the crates and plywood in Multiplayer, they are running and gunning (unlike Medal of Honor 2010). The textures were obviously console quality, blurry, grainy, etc. No Field of View adjustment really hurts this game in Multiplayer. There are a lot of moments where is I could see more I would die less. A lot of times people can run around you without seeing you and you seeing them. It is semi-difficult sometimes to cover multiple hallways and corners at once because you vision is either non-existent or in the peripheral vision. I also simply do not like the gunplay. It is "anywhere between 2-6" shots type of shooting. Of course, I fix that problem by going on Hardcore. But, it makes regular core pretty not fun to me. The guns recoil in a zone between a little too much and way too much. It makes long range combat useless for certain classes (with small guns) and useful for certain classes (with long guns). I also liked that the points and support action system returned to MoH. Though I hate that it isn't numerical anymore, the support action system provides satisfying support. The Multiplayer maps are terrible. They are extra small but the gameplay is (what I feel) made for semi-open maps. Compared to MoH 2010 which had more support actions though, only 4 actions are available. Overall MoH Warfighter was a rushed and poorly designed project.… Expand
  6. Kenshexii
    Oct 28, 2012
    4
    Single Player bit:
    I actually really enjoyed the first Moh from Danger Close. It was more realistic then CoD story was not hollywoodish and gameplay was good. My expectations were more or less the same maybe a bit higher since the game was moving to Frostbite 2 and seeing what BF3 could deliver, I think that expectation was not ungrounded.
    Unfortunatly those expectations got blown after    Single Player bit:
    I actually really enjoyed the first Moh from Danger Close. It was more realistic then CoD story was not hollywoodish and gameplay was good. My expectations were more or less the same maybe a bit higher since the game was moving to Frostbite 2 and seeing what BF3 could deliver, I think that expectation was not ungrounded.
    Unfortunatly those expectations got blown after 30 minutes of playing.
    First : This is Frostbite 2? Why is it that BF3 looks a million times better, plays better and has a better feel to it.
    Then the AI of the uber Tier 1 operatives is so bad, that I actually have been backstabbed by enemies alot of times because my AI teammates can't kill or hit anything and the enemies just run through our lines....
    Also it seems Danger Close knows something about the tech of the US army that we don't.
    Wood is the new über kevlar, you cannot penetrate it with any weapon.
    I though a full auto shotgun should be able to shred plywood without too much trouble.
    I'm half way through the game and honestly I can't be bothered to continue. WORST GAME in the last 5 years...

    The multiplayer isn't bad but nowhere as good as BF3 or CoD to be honest...
    Anyway this game is not worth the 50    … Expand
  7. DoubleCore
    Oct 26, 2012
    2
    Same generic shooter we game every couple months. It Doesn't change anything, linear campaign and awe-full gameplay. Using the Frosbite 2 engine isn't making any better. It's like taking Battlefield 3 and creating a different story line. Very disappointed of what I got. I really liked the MoH 2010 and this? not even half of it.
  8. netstorm
    Oct 24, 2012
    6
    Graphics are good, and it is somewhat fun if you have a team mate who speaks english and uses the fire team properly. Voice chat is terrible, and I hate the small maps plus you can't jump on rocks or anything else. There are also invisible walls everywhere which are super annoying. Save your money, and wait for BF4. I think this may be the last MOH game released because this may easilyGraphics are good, and it is somewhat fun if you have a team mate who speaks english and uses the fire team properly. Voice chat is terrible, and I hate the small maps plus you can't jump on rocks or anything else. There are also invisible walls everywhere which are super annoying. Save your money, and wait for BF4. I think this may be the last MOH game released because this may easily lose EA a lot of money. Now it makes sense why they didn't allow review copies sent out early, and also heavily discounted it at 50% off to premium bf owners. Anyways now i'm ranting, the fact is don't blow your money on this game.… Expand
  9. LetMeKnowBetter
    Nov 11, 2012
    10
    Before I tell you why this game is the better shooter per this day and deserve 10 points on my scale, let me tell you why most people flush it in the toilet.
    Its about taking time to get to know a game and learn it. I think that the reviewers out there have SKYHIGH expectations about this game because it's being developed by danger's close. I am the kind of gamer who likes the different    Before I tell you why this game is the better shooter per this day and deserve 10 points on my scale, let me tell you why most people flush it in the toilet.
    Its about taking time to get to know a game and learn it. I think that the reviewers out there have SKYHIGH expectations about this game because it's being developed by danger's close. I am the kind of gamer who likes the different games because i've grown tired of CoD and BF. And thats because there's no variation in those games. But in MoH:WF you have full customization on guns and solidiers, every class have a special ability, and there also is a correct running mechanism and LEANING mechanism which works very well. I think the most wellcome'ed thing about the game is the special abilities. This have been developed to have a solution for nube-toobs without taking the noobtube away from the noobs. For example Spec Ops-class have an ability called "Scan" wich gives you heat-vision through walls for just a sec and give you better control for the situation, this way, the nubetube is no longer in court and judged by the more experienced gamers. The only "neg" I have to report is the maps. They're not bad at all, but they're confusing at first and not as good as the old MoH2010 maps. But in terms of gameplay and fun a clear 10!    … Expand
  10. Chrono
    Nov 4, 2012
    2
    This game is a load of garbage, buggy as hell, laggy as hell, unbalanced as hell, cluttered as hell and unoriginal as hell..What the hell was happening in Danger Close's mind eh? This game just ruins the MoH franchise..The single player? What the hell is that?
  11. tomasse
    Oct 29, 2012
    4
    New type of review:

    1. From load-to-gameplay (-3): - Unskippable opening splash screens (Company/Game/Engine logos etc.). - 4 menus to gameplay: - "Origin Login" (could've been done in backgroung), - "Press enter" (We can all agree that this menu can be wipped out of the face of gaming, once and for all), - Singleplayer/Multiplayer etc. options menu, -    New type of review:

    1. From load-to-gameplay (-3): - Unskippable opening splash screens (Company/Game/Engine logos etc.). - 4 menus to gameplay: - "Origin Login" (could've been done in backgroung), - "Press enter" (We can all agree that this menu can be wipped out of the face of gaming, once and for all), - Singleplayer/Multiplayer etc. options menu, - New game/continue etc. options menu. - Absence of option to instant "quit to desktop" from gameplay. - Longer waiting times, from load to gameplay due to all the above. - The many menus (2 or 3 level menus) and options increase/add to the general clutter.

    2. Cutscenes/Loading screens/Gameplay (-2): - Unskippable cutscenes. - Unpausable cutscenes. - Difference between the cutscenes and gameplay video/graphics takes away deeper game immersion. - Transitions from gameplay-to-cutscenes-and-gameplay-again are rough/bad and instant without any fade in/out music or theme part. - Very bad women characters models.The men models were generic but OK for a FPS, but the women were just plain awful. - THE BEARDS.

    3. Unfinished/Rushed-out feeling (-1)

    -------------------------------------------------------- - Gameplay (6) - Graphics/Video (8) - Music/Audio (4) - Story (2) - Character Connection (2) - Overall game immersion (2) - Drama (2) - Action (6.5) - OVERALL (4) - Recomended Yes/No (No)    … Expand
  12. Phonzie
    Nov 4, 2012
    0
    Thought the game was pretty average, the shooting mechanics were worse than the 2010 game, the driving mechanics were ok though. Then I exited the game for half an hour, after checking the mission select first and saw that I was on the last level. Then when I went back in, my save data was gone and I had to start again. I had been playing on Hard too. I tried to get support and gotThought the game was pretty average, the shooting mechanics were worse than the 2010 game, the driving mechanics were ok though. Then I exited the game for half an hour, after checking the mission select first and saw that I was on the last level. Then when I went back in, my save data was gone and I had to start again. I had been playing on Hard too. I tried to get support and got none. I have now uninstalled the game and hopefully trade it back in, I'd even trade it for a stick of gum probably… Expand
  13. kalvin
    Oct 30, 2012
    3
    multiplayer critica...Bien....la verdad esperaba otra cosa de este juego. yo buscaba algo realista algo distinto (veía algo distinto algo prometedor mi debut con MHO fue una desilusión ) y parece que todos los juegos van a seguir la linea del call of duty ("juego que para mi es una reverenda MIERDA!!!"). y bueno esto viene de EA. "que puedo esperar de esta gente".....
    si te    multiplayer critica...Bien....la verdad esperaba otra cosa de este juego. yo buscaba algo realista algo distinto (veía algo distinto algo prometedor mi debut con MHO fue una desilusión ) y parece que todos los juegos van a seguir la linea del call of duty ("juego que para mi es una reverenda MIERDA!!!"). y bueno esto viene de EA. "que puedo esperar de esta gente".....
    si te gusta la mierda del cod o el bf3 ni lo pienses, seguro que te va a gustar como la gran mayoría de la gilada.....si buscas algo realista algo distinto a lo q se viene jugando este no es tu juego... (es mas estoy pensando en vender mi cuenta de origin)
    voy a seguir jugando a mis juegos favoritos RO2, cs:go, dod:s ......    … Expand
  14. gamer27997
    Oct 27, 2012
    7
    The game is not what i expect, I think I was better than BF3
    But this is an exact replica with a few changes to the graphics, the plot and the way you play the game, frustrating

    believe two things:
    A ʹ. Can something above the EA and Danger Close
    B. An analogy of the first MoH(2010)
  15. Thingriz
    Oct 29, 2012
    0
    Absolute fail on Pc in every respect. Not one thing good to say about it. Multiplay is plagued with deal breaker's spawning under map repeatedly. Kiddies playing with gamepads and auto aim against legit PC gamers. Just plain gone to far when they build the aimbots into the game. This happened in the last one too. So they just don't learn from their mistakes. EA has truly lived up to it'sAbsolute fail on Pc in every respect. Not one thing good to say about it. Multiplay is plagued with deal breaker's spawning under map repeatedly. Kiddies playing with gamepads and auto aim against legit PC gamers. Just plain gone to far when they build the aimbots into the game. This happened in the last one too. So they just don't learn from their mistakes. EA has truly lived up to it's title "the worst company in America." I'm sending this POS back.… Expand
  16. TheGrindeR
    Jan 26, 2013
    0
    Zero score. One of the worst modern fps game i ever played. EA and Danger Close killed MoH franchise.
  17. unoMaestro
    Nov 2, 2012
    7
    Not so bad attempt to bring some tactics into ModernWarfare-style games. Small maps, fast battles and kill streak bonuses are still in place, but there is no chance to just run circles and kill anyone on the way.
    However, this game is a bit inconvenient now: (1) heap-fire is useless (2) View-mode and Aiming-mode sensitivities can't be adjusted separately and their proportion is illogical    Not so bad attempt to bring some tactics into ModernWarfare-style games. Small maps, fast battles and kill streak bonuses are still in place, but there is no chance to just run circles and kill anyone on the way.
    However, this game is a bit inconvenient now: (1) heap-fire is useless (2) View-mode and Aiming-mode sensitivities can't be adjusted separately and their proportion is illogical (for me).    … Expand
  18. evry1isacritic
    Nov 4, 2012
    4
    EA:
    I'm getting really disappointed with your company these days. The games you are releasing these days have so many day 0 bugs it's just unforgivable. I am NOT going to pre-order anymore games from you anymore until you get their act straight. Your "ohh-shinny-extra-dogtags" pre-order tricks won't work.
    Want to know why I'm pissed? I have the game installed on an SSD. S. S. D.    EA:
    I'm getting really disappointed with your company these days. The games you are releasing these days have so many day 0 bugs it's just unforgivable. I am NOT going to pre-order anymore games from you anymore until you get their act straight. Your "ohh-shinny-extra-dogtags" pre-order tricks won't work.

    Want to know why I'm pissed? I have the game installed on an SSD. S. S. D. When the game first boots up and displays the EA logo with big explosions, it becomes CHOPPY? WHAT? This is even BEFORE I get to the main menu? How can this part even LAG?

    The single player campaign doesn't even LAST any longer than 5 hours! I understand the focus is more on multiplayer but 5 HOURS? C'mon! Speaking of single player campaign, it was so buggy it wasn't even funny. There were many times where the friendly AI would tell me to move up while they're stuck in a spot 2 checkpoints behind me! So much for your whole team concept BS that you try to sell in your story. There was also this one point in the game where the video would freeze and everybody and their brothers were complaining in the forums about it. Once again, the community had to bail you out of that one and come up with ingenious ways of resolving YOUR bugs.

    The quality of your games just gets worst with every iteration. About the only thing that you have right these days is your frostbite 2 engine. And the sad part is, every complaint that I've made in this review applied to BF3. Obviously, you guys do not listen very well to your community... and you wonder why COD sells better. Pfft..    … Expand
  19. monkeyspunk
    Apr 3, 2013
    4
    As a gaming Vet if you say Medal of Honor i think Awesome single player war game Medal of Honor: Warfighter did not really do it for me the single player looks nice but didn't shout Epic at me at all and the multiplayer lost me lol ..
    I don't know what there trying to do with MoH but hopefully they`ll learn.
  20. SenshudoTV
    Oct 16, 2013
    8
    Medal of Honor has always been one of my favourite franchises, especially for the story. Great single player experience however the bugs in multiplayer let the game down.
  21. 5GOKMANBI
    Nov 13, 2015
    10
    The game has changed my life. South Korea's players are all aware of the MOHW. It is so famous. MOHW was a unique pronouns. For example, it is collectively Battlefield Hardline, Titan fall, Call of Duty Ghost, SimCity 5. So that is a great game.
  22. str8pNOsh8ke
    Nov 5, 2012
    10
    First off this is a SPECTACULAR GAME!. There must be some type of conspiracy against the Medal Of Honor Game. I love it! Great graphics great sound, and the best gun mechanics I've ever saw. I mean these guns feel and respond authentic. If you like fps/war games, support this game. If you don't we'll be stuck with the same old same old year after year. Two thumbs way up!!!
  23. mintlo
    Oct 25, 2012
    5
    It has potential but everything about it is a clusterf**k. The game menu is a maze...I have to button mash just to try to find out how to change my loadout. If I wanted to get noob tubed for the entirety of a match I would go back to modern warfare 2. My 'buddy' apparently went to go do something or other and never came back to the game...did the game kick him? No, he never spawned andIt has potential but everything about it is a clusterf**k. The game menu is a maze...I have to button mash just to try to find out how to change my loadout. If I wanted to get noob tubed for the entirety of a match I would go back to modern warfare 2. My 'buddy' apparently went to go do something or other and never came back to the game...did the game kick him? No, he never spawned and I never got a different teamate...and there is no option with which you could change to a different partner either. I didn't even touch the single player as I figured it would be a steaming pile of excrement.… Expand
  24. kodene
    Oct 27, 2012
    5
    let's keep it short and sweet cause I detest long drawn out rantings.

    gameplay: 5/10 ai is ok, game is very linear (go fig), nothing new or exciting graphics: 5/10 nothing new or spectacular, kind of a CPU hog, crappy framerates controls: 4/10 really "chunky" and awful. lot of times it feels like you're controlling a retarded gorilla not a spec ops soldier audio: 1/10 the    let's keep it short and sweet cause I detest long drawn out rantings.

    gameplay: 5/10 ai is ok, game is very linear (go fig), nothing new or exciting

    graphics: 5/10 nothing new or spectacular, kind of a CPU hog, crappy framerates

    controls: 4/10 really "chunky" and awful. lot of times it feels like you're controlling a retarded gorilla not a spec ops soldier

    audio: 1/10 the audio actually plays as it's supposed to maybe 70% of the time and the rest of the time it just skips and crackles like a CD scratched to hell. Just awful

    Honestly, I should've waited and bought it a couple of months from now when Origin drops it down to $20-30 like I did the last MOH when Steam had it for $5    … Expand
  25. Draekoth
    Nov 3, 2012
    1
    I do multiplayer games mostly, don't really care about single player games. With that in mind, the multiplayer on this game is nothing more then twitch reflexes. As others have said, it's near impossible to get beyond the 2nd support action. This game is no where near being as good as the 2010 MOH version. This game is built for consoles, and thus the graphics are so outdated, no wayI do multiplayer games mostly, don't really care about single player games. With that in mind, the multiplayer on this game is nothing more then twitch reflexes. As others have said, it's near impossible to get beyond the 2nd support action. This game is no where near being as good as the 2010 MOH version. This game is built for consoles, and thus the graphics are so outdated, no way to change your FOV in-game, or many of the other PC options you normally have in PC games. IMO, it is not a PC game at all, just a terrible console port. I completely regret buying this game and wish we could get refunds. Stick with battlefield 3 or CoD as this is a console game at heart.… Expand
  26. Nachocheese279
    Dec 8, 2013
    0
    What a piece of this game is. Jesus christ I can't believe I wasted 60 dollars on this when it came out. Boring single player campaign full of glitches a multiplayer mode that has the same old stuff we expect from a first person shooter. If you bought this game for 60 bucks I feel bad for you.
  27. JWoods
    Oct 31, 2012
    2
    Average Campaign, but annoying bugs ruin it. Multiplayer has terrible hit detection and I spend half my time being spawned out of the map thanks to Danger Closes terrible coding abilities. Worth renting, but you'd be a sucker to buy this. I can't believe this game has been in development for 2 years! 2.5/10
  28. Prfct
    Nov 15, 2012
    0
    No no no no no! Stuttering everywhere, broken cutscenes, broken physics (containers that fall like boxes on first level, wtf?), random crashes to desktop every other checkpoint, convoluted story thats says absolutely nothing nor is capable of getting a point across, short single player campaign, on rail levels and, i have to insist, LOTS of random crashes to desktop... in spite of all thisNo no no no no! Stuttering everywhere, broken cutscenes, broken physics (containers that fall like boxes on first level, wtf?), random crashes to desktop every other checkpoint, convoluted story thats says absolutely nothing nor is capable of getting a point across, short single player campaign, on rail levels and, i have to insist, LOTS of random crashes to desktop... in spite of all this Danger Close said the first patch will come with the first batch of DLC, around one month from now... **** you I'm getting my money back.… Expand
  29. bearnet
    Apr 7, 2014
    0
    Truly awful. Negligently so. EA may temporarily humiliated themselves by apologising but why not a refund or vouchers? I hope the bonuses of those involved were properly adjusted downward.
  30. stefanx
    Dec 1, 2012
    7
    I have been very pleased with the singleplayer part of the game, very good storyline, even the multiplayer part is great enough but i am so disappointed by EA help line, encountered some issues and needed help, well EA helpline as been the best of all in the recent years, now it is simply impossible to reach them, the online contact us doesn't work, the links to log in or request help areI have been very pleased with the singleplayer part of the game, very good storyline, even the multiplayer part is great enough but i am so disappointed by EA help line, encountered some issues and needed help, well EA helpline as been the best of all in the recent years, now it is simply impossible to reach them, the online contact us doesn't work, the links to log in or request help are broken, can't log in to get help. and now i just installed windows 8 and can't play online anymore as the platform is incompatible for online gaming. at least origin help line works and the fellow been able to explain this to me. thumbs up for origin, thumbs down for ea who were unable to get ready for the new windows and now seems to hide from us.… Expand
  31. ofc1978
    Nov 13, 2012
    1
    This Game is a very bad game! The Aiming is bad, the Maps are small, the teamplay does not work on it, the graphics is from 2-3 Years ago (where is the Frostbite 2 - Engine, it is lost), no feeling comes in this Game, you need no skill to get good in MP, you made Level 100 (the highest Level) in 30~40h, then you made all Classes and Weapons free, and then??? Then comes nothing more!
    The    This Game is a very bad game! The Aiming is bad, the Maps are small, the teamplay does not work on it, the graphics is from 2-3 Years ago (where is the Frostbite 2 - Engine, it is lost), no feeling comes in this Game, you need no skill to get good in MP, you made Level 100 (the highest Level) in 30~40h, then you made all Classes and Weapons free, and then??? Then comes nothing more!
    The Modi´s are known from other Games: Homerun~Capture the Flag ...
    Nothing NEW, i will say, that MoH 2010 was better in Gameplay, Teamplay and Graphics!!!    … Expand
  32. AxeFish
    Mar 3, 2013
    4
    The Singleplayer is just what you'd expect from any military FPS game now a days. No, seriously, that's all I can say about it.
    If you played any Call of Duty or any other Military FPS with regenerating health and team mates that slow down your progress, you've played this game's singleplayer.
    The graphics are alright, sound design is average and the driving missions are actually pretty    The Singleplayer is just what you'd expect from any military FPS game now a days. No, seriously, that's all I can say about it.
    If you played any Call of Duty or any other Military FPS with regenerating health and team mates that slow down your progress, you've played this game's singleplayer.
    The graphics are alright, sound design is average and the driving missions are actually pretty fun. But it's only 4-5 hours long, so there's not a whole lot of content that you can get out of it.
    Multiplayer is....pretty much the same thing you'd expect from any other military shooters with classes and unlocks. Gun play is decent enough, but the map design is just horrible and feels sloppily thought out. There's pretty much no open spaces, everything is tight and cornered.
    You're better off playing TDM on Battlefield 3. All I can say is that I'm glad that I got this game at a reduced price.    … Expand
  33. Necrotaur
    Nov 11, 2012
    3
    I wasn't even planning on getting this game, but it was discounted, and a friend urged me to. The lesson is twofold: there is a reason it was half off less than a month after release, and my friends are stupid. The single player campaign is forgettable, yet somehow manages to be tedious despite only being 5 hours long. All Warfighter really has going for it is a degree of authenticity, butI wasn't even planning on getting this game, but it was discounted, and a friend urged me to. The lesson is twofold: there is a reason it was half off less than a month after release, and my friends are stupid. The single player campaign is forgettable, yet somehow manages to be tedious despite only being 5 hours long. All Warfighter really has going for it is a degree of authenticity, but when you view it through the prism of a supersoldier with regenerating health and unlimited ammo, it reduces the experience by a large degree. My point is this: Warfighter should have been a tactical shooter like Rainbow 6, not a Call of Duty clone. There are also a load of bugs. Multiplayer *looks* alright, and customization *looks* cool. I say looks because I am disconnected within 10 seconds of joining every match. Fun! Origin and the Battlelog are just as terrible as ever.… Expand
  34. cafebabe
    Nov 10, 2012
    3
    Single player is a joke. The story is stupid and uninteresting. It's an interactive shooting gallery. I wonder, why the studio even spend time on developing the single player campaign. They should have it invested in the multiplayer part of the game. Anyway, I bought it for multiplayer, which has potential for fun. The idea of the fire team is good. And I had some fun until cheaters got toSingle player is a joke. The story is stupid and uninteresting. It's an interactive shooting gallery. I wonder, why the studio even spend time on developing the single player campaign. They should have it invested in the multiplayer part of the game. Anyway, I bought it for multiplayer, which has potential for fun. The idea of the fire team is good. And I had some fun until cheaters got to the game and destroyed it. Wallhacks and aimbots seem to be the standard on each server. And with the bad scores, EA is likely to drop support on this game fast. Two other frustrating things: The game crashes often. Playing through Battlelog is impossible because of bugs. Secondly, the menu system is really bad. The game is clearly unfinished, There are so much issues which should have never passed quality assurance. The bad single player and the quality and cheating issues make this the worst shooter of the past years.… Expand
  35. franco214
    Nov 13, 2012
    4
    An utterly uninspiring game that unfortunately will follow in the footsteps of the first and into my recycle bin. The campaign throws up very little of a challenge and can easily be completed in one medium sitting on the computer, however, will you be bothered to finish the campaign is another story entirely. I had to force myself to finish the game just to see if it got any better andAn utterly uninspiring game that unfortunately will follow in the footsteps of the first and into my recycle bin. The campaign throws up very little of a challenge and can easily be completed in one medium sitting on the computer, however, will you be bothered to finish the campaign is another story entirely. I had to force myself to finish the game just to see if it got any better and unfortunately it didn't. Trying to carve a niche in the FPS market is difficult and you would think borrowing ideas from Battlefield and Call of Duty you could come up with a winning formulae, MOHW has proved that it is not that simple. This game is not worth spending any money on, there are much better examples and attempts at FPS on the Free to Play market.… Expand
  36. Ensi
    Nov 29, 2012
    4
    I just finished the campaign and it was pretty terrible. I feel that they tried to cater to the Call Of Duty fans by desperately incorporating various mechanics and scenes.

    Mechanics are wonky and all over the place. There is like.. 3 guns or something in the campaign and that disappointed me very much. Well not 3 guns exactly but there were so few. And most of them are bad. Story is    I just finished the campaign and it was pretty terrible. I feel that they tried to cater to the Call Of Duty fans by desperately incorporating various mechanics and scenes.

    Mechanics are wonky and all over the place. There is like.. 3 guns or something in the campaign and that disappointed me very much. Well not 3 guns exactly but there were so few. And most of them are bad.

    Story is confusing and is your typical "'MERICA YEAH TERRORISTS BLOW THEMSELVES UP!!!" middle-eastern shoot-em up. You go to one area, fight a wave of dudes, go to another, fight another wave etc, very COD like.

    Haven't tried MP yet, but I didn't get it for the MP. I also heard the MP is just as bad.

    I did like the part where they tried to honor the soldier and keep it authentic. When you reload you actually don't rack the slide if you already have a round in the chamber, neato.

    All in all, the game is pretty ****    … Expand
  37. niknuk
    Jan 4, 2013
    1
    One of the worst shooters I`ve ever played (only played multiplayer).
    The previous MOH tier 1 had a decent sp campaign with nice and up to date visuals, multiplayer maps with interesting settings but mostly failing design. With this new one they kept the failing design, and made it horrible. All this talk about frostbyte 2 and the graphics look outdated and far worse then in its    One of the worst shooters I`ve ever played (only played multiplayer).
    The previous MOH tier 1 had a decent sp campaign with nice and up to date visuals, multiplayer maps with interesting settings but mostly failing design. With this new one they kept the failing design, and made it horrible. All this talk about frostbyte 2 and the graphics look outdated and far worse then in its predecessor..? How did they manage that. Nah, there must be a hidden agenda to produce this crap    … Expand
  38. Ghoster
    Nov 11, 2012
    1
    Probably FAIL of the year. Only good thing about it is Frostbite 2 engine and even this was spoled partly because poor level design! I preordered the game cause I liked MOH 2010 and was waiting for months release. Oh! What a disappointment and waste of money. Shortly... Worst and dullest single player lately. Multiplayer also very bad. If you like MOH rather play MOH 2010... It have bothProbably FAIL of the year. Only good thing about it is Frostbite 2 engine and even this was spoled partly because poor level design! I preordered the game cause I liked MOH 2010 and was waiting for months release. Oh! What a disappointment and waste of money. Shortly... Worst and dullest single player lately. Multiplayer also very bad. If you like MOH rather play MOH 2010... It have both better SP and MP...
    Don't know how much gameplay is there becaue I was playing 30 minutes and uninstalled :(    … Expand
  39. kane148
    Apr 5, 2014
    4
    I got this game for $5, so I guess I can't complain--I got what I paid for. But this sequel is much worse than its predecessor. While the first MOH had a fairly simple and believable story: soldiers hunting down targets in Afghanistan, this game tries (and fails) to be like COD: MW, with a lot of different locales and big, bad plots to blow up the world. It also introduces a lot ofI got this game for $5, so I guess I can't complain--I got what I paid for. But this sequel is much worse than its predecessor. While the first MOH had a fairly simple and believable story: soldiers hunting down targets in Afghanistan, this game tries (and fails) to be like COD: MW, with a lot of different locales and big, bad plots to blow up the world. It also introduces a lot of cuteness and *tries* to use them to develop characters, but ti's all very bland stereotypical nonsense that we've seen a million times. Gameplay wise, this game introduces a few interesting features (such as different breaching methods and alternate optics), but they cannot redeem it. Most missions are clunky and poorly designed, with plenty of bugs. A few missions are kinda interesting, but they can't make up for the many other frustrating hoops you'll have to jump through,… Expand
  40. jah1337
    Nov 15, 2012
    3
    Quite disappointing on every aspect :
    - graphically, despite the game using Frostbite 2, it is not better than the 2010 UE3-driven MoH...
    - the solo is boring, it's a succession of corridors where you end up waiting for the enemies to come out of their covers to shoot them ; the car driving parts are fun in the beginning but rapidly become boring as well - the multiplayer part takes    Quite disappointing on every aspect :
    - graphically, despite the game using Frostbite 2, it is not better than the 2010 UE3-driven MoH...
    - the solo is boring, it's a succession of corridors where you end up waiting for the enemies to come out of their covers to shoot them ; the car driving parts are fun in the beginning but rapidly become boring as well
    - the multiplayer part takes place on very small maps with poor level-design    … Expand
  41. Velqirax
    Dec 5, 2012
    2
    Okay, i liked most MOH 2010, but this one its totally dissapointing, the story telling its quite good thou, (if you are searching for story continuity or reading a book). Single player needs more action and more fixes. Its like a copy paste "omg! COD black ops its going out to the market we gotta rush!!".Why 2 points instead of just 1/0 because you know a nice story about those unknownOkay, i liked most MOH 2010, but this one its totally dissapointing, the story telling its quite good thou, (if you are searching for story continuity or reading a book). Single player needs more action and more fixes. Its like a copy paste "omg! COD black ops its going out to the market we gotta rush!!".Why 2 points instead of just 1/0 because you know a nice story about those unknown fighters and multiplayer its kinda nice but you want more out of it... okay lets face its its boooring needs more movement more action, more design, and more levels. Finally dont buy it NEVER… Expand
  42. Awjustad
    Mar 11, 2013
    2
    The feeling you get when playing MOH warfighter for the first time is “they can’t be serious??!”, this is in my opinion a huge setback that don’t bring anything new to the genre at all! I have always loved the MOH franchise, but this time I feel ripped off big time. AI is nonexistent in both your allies and your enemies, your allies will push you out from cover if you are on theirThe feeling you get when playing MOH warfighter for the first time is “they can’t be serious??!”, this is in my opinion a huge setback that don’t bring anything new to the genre at all! I have always loved the MOH franchise, but this time I feel ripped off big time. AI is nonexistent in both your allies and your enemies, your allies will push you out from cover if you are on their designated spot and your enemies will come flooding from nowhere and take cover in the middle of the road..standing. The previous realism is gone and the game feels more like it should be sold with the Nintendo 1gen duck hunt gun and have automatic movement after the shooting is over. It could had saved it for me if it gave a great 3d experience, but 3d vision support is not present and the game will actually freeze and crash if 3d is activated. I really liked MOH 2010 even with its limited AI, but this game got so bad after 20min gameplay that I just gave up trying to enjoy it.… Expand
  43. skalragg
    Mar 14, 2013
    1
    This is the worst multiplayer game I have played in a long time, the game feels and looks rushed in its design and execution. It tries to almost come across as a rival to COD but even fails at that. The maps are small boring and for the most part unoriginal. They are linear and don't really allow for cover.

    If the people in EA spent less time arsing about with the integration of    This is the worst multiplayer game I have played in a long time, the game feels and looks rushed in its design and execution. It tries to almost come across as a rival to COD but even fails at that. The maps are small boring and for the most part unoriginal. They are linear and don't really allow for cover.

    If the people in EA spent less time arsing about with the integration of ''unlocks'' battlelog and other social media.... they might have developed a half decent game, Don'#t waste your time or money    … Expand
  44. Alcatraz_vk
    Mar 22, 2013
    4
    Well, I've played this game and... based on I'm a campaign-game maniac... this was... a bit frustrating... LOTS OF THINGS and scenes remembered to CoD MW series and BF3. Good graphics with video resolution problems (like OUT OF RANGE while video starts)... At beginning confusing controls... control options are not well build (based on MY OWN experience) And the story... pff... I don't knowWell, I've played this game and... based on I'm a campaign-game maniac... this was... a bit frustrating... LOTS OF THINGS and scenes remembered to CoD MW series and BF3. Good graphics with video resolution problems (like OUT OF RANGE while video starts)... At beginning confusing controls... control options are not well build (based on MY OWN experience) And the story... pff... I don't know what to say... Yea, looks like the 2nd part of the last MoH with Rabbit but I watched at the beginning it was a bit hurried... i don't know how to express exactly. At last, it was a notable deception for me. Pretty guns, good effects, nice jokes and commentaries, bad guys killed me through concrete walls and materials when I couldn't shoot at them... so, a deception. I hoped it was better game. Therefore the control is a bit rough, I don't know, but all EA Games has a millisecond retard to respond the key-push that creeps my nerves...
    I just give them a 4.    … Expand
  45. BritMboh
    Oct 13, 2017
    3
    An absolute pile of dross. It's functional but thats about it. It's story is atrociously incoherent, it's multiplayer is uninspired and it just plays like a watered down Modern Warfare.
  46. ComradVlad
    Sep 8, 2013
    7
    Bought, played, what to say. Untill the next battlefield, and not very catchy. Dull game, effectively maximum the beginning, and then just monotonous passage, yet soft and dull voice spoils the whole game. I do not know what the developers were hoping to make the game at Frost, or on the label of the series Well there are many small graphics like the pluses, but you can try it withBought, played, what to say. Untill the next battlefield, and not very catchy. Dull game, effectively maximum the beginning, and then just monotonous passage, yet soft and dull voice spoils the whole game. I do not know what the developers were hoping to make the game at Frost, or on the label of the series Well there are many small graphics like the pluses, but you can try it with textures, animation and special effects repetitive but pleasing to the eye. Oh well, on one pass play. Hoped for more… Expand
  47. Kazuma92
    Jul 31, 2014
    8
    I really love this game! Love the characters, and almost everything about it. There is not much variety of the gamplay, this is my only complain. I Beat it on Tier1 difficulty for the second time, it was one hell of a job! Never play on easy! Games like this, is bad on easy difficulty. Even on normal is boring for me. No tension. But hard diff... and tier1.. Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six, andI really love this game! Love the characters, and almost everything about it. There is not much variety of the gamplay, this is my only complain. I Beat it on Tier1 difficulty for the second time, it was one hell of a job! Never play on easy! Games like this, is bad on easy difficulty. Even on normal is boring for me. No tension. But hard diff... and tier1.. Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six, and Medal of Honor Rulez!… Expand
  48. TheEpicSheep
    Sep 30, 2013
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I was a huge fan of the MOH series when I played it on the original Xbox, I would defend this game if I had to... but I cant. In the single player mode, story line is poor. Sure it's based of "Real moments of war" but it does this to much! There's this sniper part of the first mission when instead of using the scope dead on sights, you have to align the scope to a different point of view, with no instructions! There's a car chase in the single player and its floaty as it ever been before, you often crash yourself and lose your target. Than there's this "Bust In" scenes witch are heavily scripted, but would have been fun... but instead they made it buggy and often if you don't kill the enemies when you flashed banged them in a certain amount of time, you will die. The graphics are good, but not as good as BF3, which is shocking because MOH: Warfighter is made from Frostbite 2 engine. The multiplayer is fun and addicting... but buggy, laggy, and annoying at times. You have to play with a random selected partner once you enter in the game, and if your doing good out there, while your other guy is doing bad, you will often, be in 5th place while the other team who help each other will win the squad battle. More importantly, the multiplayer does nothing interesting at all, its barebones and can get boring after a while. Often you will connect to games to be disconnected and not go back to the multiplayer screen, but to the main title screen where you have to go back to the multiplayer screen while waiting the Origins servers to load again. And here's the worst part: DLC is out of control. If you don't have enough DLC, it will never get you in a game, until you pay for all the DLC. Its just... its just stupid! Sure the last MOH game was OK but not this game. Bottom line, its Single Player is mine numbing, Multiplayer is barebones, buggy, missing tutorials, and is missing a lot of things that the developers promised. Sure the graphics are good but this is painful. which is why I give this a 3/10. This is the worst MOH game up to date... the beta test of the game was 10x better than this game. Hopefully, Danger Close will learn these mistakes and make there Next-Gen MOH game better!… Expand
  49. SteelReign
    Jun 24, 2014
    3
    **** this game. When you're not spawning directly in the line of fire of a sniper or LMG, you're dying to another enemy setup already to your flank. It doesn't let you strafe left/right, and most of the defense maps allow the attacking team to just spawn snipers and sit back and camp. No wonder this game flopped so bad, it pales in comparison to BF3 and COD. DO NOT BUY!
  50. kiloone4one
    Dec 22, 2013
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Campaign is kind of good, but there are some boring missions and some missions when you got to drive instead of shooting. In the campaign there are also too many doors to breach (what if I told you that every door you breached in Medal Of Honor Warfighter was actually open?) Also when you kill guys with a sniper rifle the bullets fly away from them, like if you aim the center of the crosshair in them the bullet will fly left or right or sometimes even down. Also some missions are taking too long to beat them but I still beat the game in 5 hours.… Expand
  51. gunemdown5150
    Jun 25, 2016
    8
    Definitely NOT the worst game i ever played as many have said? I got this for $8 and for the campaign
    i actually really like it. For story and feel it is much better than the shallow,lousy story Call of duty games
    out there. This game is NOT as bad as reviews made it out to be? I had a lot of fun playing this, When i heard they took this series out of production i was bummed    Definitely NOT the worst game i ever played as many have said? I got this for $8 and for the campaign
    i actually really like it. For story and feel it is much better than the shallow,lousy story Call of duty games
    out there. This game is NOT as bad as reviews made it out to be? I had a lot of fun playing this,
    When i heard they took this series out of production i was bummed because i really love war games but do not like Call of Duty's venture into the space age they have gone! and Battlefield is more about multiplayer,
    The graphics look really good for the year this game was made and the voice acting is much better than most war games i have played,
    overall IF you play campaigns and you can get this for around $10 i would recommend it.
    yes it is a short campaign(about 6-1/2 hours) but it is fun if you are into a good story and playing as a spec op's soldier. This game is a lot better than the new Homefront revolution and that game is $60!    … Expand
  52. rBose
    Nov 25, 2014
    0
    Worst possible experience a gamer can have.

    Ton of issues, lack of story, every single moment is scripted and defined.
    Typical american fps, bearded tough wanna be idiots that rule the game.
  53. SRKNZ
    Dec 14, 2016
    0
    BUGGY!!! If you are unlucky like me you wont be getting past the second mission. There's a bug in this title that requires you complete one of those pointless training missions that asks you to use a scoped sight. Problem is it doesn't work with some set ups, leaving you dead in the water before you have even gotten into the game.

    You would have thought EA would have been onto this but    BUGGY!!! If you are unlucky like me you wont be getting past the second mission. There's a bug in this title that requires you complete one of those pointless training missions that asks you to use a scoped sight. Problem is it doesn't work with some set ups, leaving you dead in the water before you have even gotten into the game.

    You would have thought EA would have been onto this but no even after four years this title has been on offer no one has done a thing to address the issue. Pretty shoddy to say the least.

    Last EA game I part with my hard earned $$ for.    … Expand
  54. YazanM
    Jul 3, 2014
    0
    MEDAL OF HONOR!
    DOOORFIGTER!
    KICKIN' DOWN DOORS WHEREVER WE GO.
    MEDAL OF HONOR!
    DOORFIGHTER!
    OPEN SESAME WITH THE STEEL ON MY TOE.

    Best Door Kicking Simulator ever. 10/10

    Also, yeah, it's pretty **** Don't buy it.
  55. ShockyPie42
    Jul 17, 2014
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game was offensive to the extreme! They took generic and brown and made it even more generic and even more brown I have no Idea how they did that.the themes were just white people=good
    brown people=bad,REALISM...they constantly try to say realism this is real as you run around gunning down hundreds of people because they were there,I mean the first guy you come across you have to put a bullet in the back of his head because he's wearing a turban,fudge you medal of honour war fighter...I have a quote here that is displayed at the end of the game,a final kick in the teeth if you will ...

    Real life superheroes exist they walk among us every day ready to defend our nation and its citizens at a moments notice they are the husbands,fathers,brothers and sons capable of staring death in the face.

    Because the women that serve in your army,there not superheroes are they,do not buy this sexist racist condescending opile of utter poop go and buy battlefield 3    … Expand
  56. VeteranPlayer
    Nov 18, 2014
    2
    don't waste your money, the servers are deserts. Simply fps that have nothing of special, horrible and boring single player, laggy multy,buy other, there are games more beautiful
  57. RetroPirate
    Jul 13, 2020
    1
    The good:

    +Graphics and cinematics.

    The bad and fugly:

    -Weak audio design.
    -Tedious story and souless character development.
    -Absolutely garbage gunplay.
    -Bullet sponge enemies.
    -Boring rehashed car chase scenes from BF4.
    -Lackluster map design.
    -Obtuse AI teammates.
    -Operator restricted weapons choices.
    -Poor attempt at copycating Battlefield series.
  58. WHITESIXOMAR
    Oct 29, 2021
    9
    The Campaign is a total blast! Love every minute of it. I know the game fails to accomplish what it set out to do, you can tell the story is broken and its not properly executed BUT! for some of us who can look beyond its faults it contains an amazing gameplay experience. One of the more inmersive military shooters ever! the in game constant dialog makes me feel that im sorrounded by realThe Campaign is a total blast! Love every minute of it. I know the game fails to accomplish what it set out to do, you can tell the story is broken and its not properly executed BUT! for some of us who can look beyond its faults it contains an amazing gameplay experience. One of the more inmersive military shooters ever! the in game constant dialog makes me feel that im sorrounded by real life delta force operators and not just bot that shoots enemies at my side. I love the sounds weapons make, the graphics, for me the game is almost a perfect experience. There are some crashes, the car sequences are broken and boring, but the infiltration missions are the one of the best for me. I understand why some people hate the game, and In some way i feel they are right, but as I said, some of us might look tru those bugs and shortcomings and see a real beauty.… Expand
  59. Sinster
    Feb 21, 2013
    7
    I like this game and EA/Dice screwed the pooch on this one. It could of been handled better and should have been delayed instead of releasing a game that needed to be patched. Unfortunately they didn't patch it right away and it lost a lot of people. When they did release the patch. The patch didn't do much for what the community wanted. The devs stated on Battlelog forums that theyI like this game and EA/Dice screwed the pooch on this one. It could of been handled better and should have been delayed instead of releasing a game that needed to be patched. Unfortunately they didn't patch it right away and it lost a lot of people. When they did release the patch. The patch didn't do much for what the community wanted. The devs stated on Battlelog forums that they kept a lot of stuff in game that the community didn't like. That and the patch being released a few months after it was released was a little to late for damage control. This game could have been great.… Expand
  60. Greghome
    Nov 14, 2012
    5
    TBH, this sequel to the 2010 Medal of Honor is a huge let down, with the previous installment, we were presented with a somewhat more realistic and believable plot instead of chasing Arabs across the world to kill them in the Philippines ? The 2010 game presented more realistic scenarios, to have been marketed as the most realistic military shooter yet, I was expecting less hollywood andTBH, this sequel to the 2010 Medal of Honor is a huge let down, with the previous installment, we were presented with a somewhat more realistic and believable plot instead of chasing Arabs across the world to kill them in the Philippines ? The 2010 game presented more realistic scenarios, to have been marketed as the most realistic military shooter yet, I was expecting less hollywood and more tactical gameplay.

    Moving on to Gameplay, it's nothing more than BF3 without vehicles, so anyone with the former should just stick to TDM or Rush on it, instead of buying this one for the Multiplayer. And then there's the weird and stupid AI, not to mention watching your enemy popping out if you move too fast.

    Honestly, I think the reason for the letdown for me this time around, was the fact that I actually enjoyed the first modern MoH and owns BF3. If you're a COD fan, I doubt you'll buy this one instead of BO2 though, and if you're a BF fan, I think you'll be disappointed, so I really can't see who will buy this    … Expand
  61. beergogglesftw
    Sep 23, 2014
    7
    Multiplayer Review:

    (+) Gameplay. Feels like Frostbite 2. (+) Map Design. Well balanced for each team and each classes play style. Like that you can almost always "take the high ground" for a tactical advantage, or get into the thick of it. (+) Recoil. Its good to be playing a game with recoil again. (+) Its not Call of Duty or BF3:Close Quarters. Those games force you to run    Multiplayer Review:

    (+) Gameplay. Feels like Frostbite 2.

    (+) Map Design. Well balanced for each team and each classes play style. Like that you can almost always "take the high ground" for a tactical advantage, or get into the thick of it.

    (+) Recoil. Its good to be playing a game with recoil again.

    (+) Its not Call of Duty or BF3:Close Quarters. Those games force you to run around the place and scramble around corners. MOHW has different pacing. The way I play anyway, you need to take your time moving up, working with your fireteam buddy.

    (+) In-Game VOIP. After playing BF3 for the last year, I was really afraid MOHW would use the same crumby voice chat system.

    (-) UI. I keep unlocking things, but have no idea when or how to do so. I just play and hope I'm unlocking something I want.

    (-) I wish the bullets had some more bite to them. I don't like that there's a lot of recoil and unrealistic bullets. You kind of need weak bullets with no recoil, or realistic bullets with lots of recoil. I favor the latter. (That may be something I need to just adjust to, but thats how I feel at the moment.. I should step back into MOHAA/COD1/COD2 before guns became recoil free... and see how those guns were balanced)

    (-) Not supporting my 6850 Crossfire. One card is idle. Newest driver, newest profiles.

    (-) No FOV Slider... I want to bump that up to about 90-100 in-game.

    (-+) Multiplayer graphics. Without my second card, my graphics power is on the weak side so I've been playing on "Auto" which seems to be around "high" settings with a 40 fps. I would like to kick up the appearence and FPS. The driver update just needs to come out.
    Again with the UI... if I make changes to my graphics settings, I'm not sure if any changes are occurring until after I restart the game. There's no message to save, or warning me settings will go in effect at restart.

    So... as of right now, at its core its a good game. People who are used to BF3 and/or Call of Duty expecting this game to feel like one of the other may be surprised that the game does actually have a feeling of its own, and not just a BF3/COD baby. They definitely nailed down some really good things.
    You'll notice in my list of Pros and Cons... I haven't noticed any cons that couldnt be patched very easily. So I'm liking the core gameplay.

    I didn't play MOH(2010) at launch... so I'm curious how I would have felt then compared to now... Still curious how this game will be reviewed, especially since I haven't had time for any Single player which weighs heavily in review scores. They could really knock the game down for its cons I listed, or short campaign (assuming its short).    … Expand
  62. H1TMAN930927
    Nov 22, 2012
    5
    Quick honest review, if a closed my eyes and some1 said this is the latest call of duty with new graphics, id beleive them, ......if you like call of duty campaigns you will like this, if your a battlefield 3 fan not so much..... But in my opinion its not worth buying , thats why piracy FTW!
  63. maike
    Feb 17, 2013
    5
    Poor by where you look. The only thing that saves him is the story. In everything else falls far short. Another disappointment of 2012!
    It brings something new, linear, tasteless.
    The game is not bad but lacked too rough filing.
  64. KrinSodan
    Nov 18, 2012
    8
    First off, the critics are idiots, giving this such a low score for being "unoriginal" and coming out in an "inflated" market, while giving Call of Duty high marks for doing the same **** Black Ops II is a great game as well. But this deservers nowhere NEAR The hate it got. All reviews on this site by users are opinions, I personally would recommend this game, it is one of my favoriteFirst off, the critics are idiots, giving this such a low score for being "unoriginal" and coming out in an "inflated" market, while giving Call of Duty high marks for doing the same **** Black Ops II is a great game as well. But this deservers nowhere NEAR The hate it got. All reviews on this site by users are opinions, I personally would recommend this game, it is one of my favorite modern fps's.

    Story: The story is great, the voice acting is sub-par in places, but this isn't a huge deal. Gameplay: The gameplay is fun, especially if you know what you're doing. Lights can be a bit annoying, and there can be a few frame rate drops, but I'm raiting this on what it is, an FPS, not some finely honed RPG that took twenty years to develop. Graphical Performance: Medal of Honor: Warfighter, is a beautiful game, online and offline. It runs very well on most systems. I'm running it on a 2GB GFX Card (Nvida GTX 560) with 12Gb of Ram. Sometimes, the game seems to run the same scene twice, which they've seemed to have fixed, but that caused horrible frame rate drops (I usually run at 60-75, during those times it would drop to 10-12) Weapons/Customization: There are a bunch of guns. There are even more customization options, I love the way they did up the menus. All in all, while Medal of Honor isn't a perfect game, it's a lot better than "Okay." As one of my (personal) favorite FPS's I give it an 8/10 (Which would be a 10 other than the bugs aforementioned, which have been fixed, but, in my opinion should've been ironed out.)    … Expand
  65. Hellcatenstein
    Jan 28, 2013
    7
    I was looking forward to this game since they announced it. Anyone who played the last MoH knows how great the singleplayer is, and how bland the multiplayer was. This is what I was looking forward to: a solid, immersive singleplayer campaign. Unfortunately, besides the unusually well done vehicle levels, the singleplayer campaign is short and uninspiring. In fact, it felt like itI was looking forward to this game since they announced it. Anyone who played the last MoH knows how great the singleplayer is, and how bland the multiplayer was. This is what I was looking forward to: a solid, immersive singleplayer campaign. Unfortunately, besides the unusually well done vehicle levels, the singleplayer campaign is short and uninspiring. In fact, it felt like it shared too many things in common with the movie Act of Valor.

    The multiplayer is a lot of fun though. The gunplay is pretty solid, the weapon and soldier variety is pretty nice, and Fireteams make teamwork fun and rewarding. The game modes are nothing new, but that doesn't detract from the game itself. What modes it does have are fun and work well with the class mix.

    I wouldn't recommend the game, because it's really an acquired taste, but it is nowhere near the worst FPS I played last year.    … Expand
  66. Lunatic4ever
    Feb 16, 2013
    6
    I was quite surprised by the quality of the shootouts in MOHWF. It felt really tense and real because A) the visuals are superb and B) the weapons feel real. The locations in the game look astonishing and it felt like these locations are real places with a sense of purpose. I played all of the recent COD titles and although COD is supported by a stronger budget, I think that the shootoutsI was quite surprised by the quality of the shootouts in MOHWF. It felt really tense and real because A) the visuals are superb and B) the weapons feel real. The locations in the game look astonishing and it felt like these locations are real places with a sense of purpose. I played all of the recent COD titles and although COD is supported by a stronger budget, I think that the shootouts itself aren't very tense. You pretty much run and gun most of the time while everything around you is exploding. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy that,too. But MOHWF has a very different and yet very solid foundation which hasn't been supported sufficiently. Instead of focusing on explosions (which COD clearly owns), focus on the intensity of firefights because with the help of the frostbite engine, superb sound and realisitic set pieces, this could be the war game for grown ups. I know they have paused the MOH series because it failed to sell. But it doesn't come as a suprise, it was advertised as yet another COD, the action scenes felt forced and the campaign is 5 hours long which is a shame. Refocus on the depiction of modern war in today's world and stick to realism and it should be a winner the next time around.… Expand
  67. nitai007
    Feb 17, 2013
    8
    this is a really great game. it doesnt have major knew ideas that take it further than the standard modern shooters, but it is overall great. the game has a overall good and touching story, but it didnt do the famaily stuff as it was promised and in the end the family stuff was dull and not developed. the gameplay is great, and the guns feel great. the multiplayer is great too, and you diethis is a really great game. it doesnt have major knew ideas that take it further than the standard modern shooters, but it is overall great. the game has a overall good and touching story, but it didnt do the famaily stuff as it was promised and in the end the family stuff was dull and not developed. the gameplay is great, and the guns feel great. the multiplayer is great too, and you die here much more fast than other games, which makes you think before you run guns blazing. the big problem is that the multiplayer is buggy, not unplayable buggy but quite buggy. overall this is a great shooter and if you like modern shooters you should deffinetly buy it. it doesnt have a lot of knew ideas exept the fireteam buddy system but its still a really great game… Expand
  68. Atyne
    Sep 17, 2021
    7
    Huge potential veiled in poor technical state and design.
    +great atmosphere
    +visuals, animations, sounds
    +story

    -inconsistent gunplay - some guns are fun and some have random recoil with a huge spread, etc
    -restrictive scripts
    -multiplayer is terrible - a copy of COD with bad balance
    -terrible UI
    -FOV and mouse sensitivity control
  69. Neddy
    Jan 1, 2015
    7
    Score 7/10, if you buy on a good sale price. If it's bought for more than £9 the score goes down significantly. However I do not include the multiplayer content as I never compete online.

    MOH:W is quite short. At 6.5 hours this took me to complete, you need to buy it on a budget price offering. I will no doubt play it again. 7/10 is a low sort of score but only because even when bought    Score 7/10, if you buy on a good sale price. If it's bought for more than £9 the score goes down significantly. However I do not include the multiplayer content as I never compete online.

    MOH:W is quite short. At 6.5 hours this took me to complete, you need to buy it on a budget price offering. I will no doubt play it again. 7/10 is a low sort of score but only because even when bought cheap it's still a short game. If MOH and MOH Warfighter were stuck together and bought for £10, that would be a good game. (NB Same characters in both.)

    At the start of the game I was shocked and almost stopped playing. The training for teaching which keys etc for scoping and such, is done as a jihadist. This is in stomach churning taste. Simply not acceptable. However you do get to see that training ground's significance later on.

    Anyway I massively disappointedly passed over that and played on. The game itself was good. It flows and is not too hard in any way. Easier to play than the its predecessor. It looks fine too and is well produced.

    Besides the game being good, the hook for me with game became more evident as the game went on. I like the characters, and if the next instalment has them in I would look forward to it for that. The characters are believable and they are examples of soldiers I like to think exist. Simply cool special-ops in action servicemen.

    It's impossible not to feel a sense of connection to real soldiers fighting for freedom, and their lives. It's the third MOH I have and they all make me emotional at the end. It's a glimpse and taste of combat wrapped up a in smooth shooter.    … Expand
  70. Tomle1202
    Jan 29, 2016
    5
    Medal of Honor: Warfighter is a flat, one-dimensional experience full of moments that you have seen and things that you have done a million times before.
  71. jelikey
    Sep 10, 2015
    6
    MoH: Warfighter suffers from an inconsistent campaign and brings nothing new to the multiplayer arena; however, Danger Close do show some potential and perhaps their next title will not be so compromised - for now, 7/10 - higher if you like the MP but lower if you're after a satisfying campaign.
  72. toberewoven571
    May 24, 2015
    5
    plot ,dialogue ,mission objective ,gameplay,characters design can be improve.
    graphics is nice

    i assume they are trying their best to make this game better than Cod/BF
  73. gold
    Jan 16, 2019
    5
    Было скучно: скучнее, чем предыдущая часть. Сюжет - 5... Мне больше нечего сказать.
    Итог: 5.000/10
  74. IvanWolf
    Oct 19, 2018
    5
    not a bad shooter at once.
    many mistakes, bad plot (boring and not interesting), not bad shooting physics, average graphics for his age. In general, the usual conveyor shooting gallery similar to the call of duty.
  75. derHausmeister
    Mar 17, 2019
    7
    Kampagnen-Review:

    Die Story ist solide, das Gameplay top. Manchmal gibt es hier und da kleine Fehler, z.B. das Gegner neben einem spawnen, weil man "falsch" abgebogen ist. Andererseits kann man, wenn man weiß wo die Gegner herkommen auch direkt eine Granate reinwerfen. Da ich nie gedient habe, geschweige denn im Krieg war, kann ich natürlich nur vermuten, dass das Spiel realistisch    Kampagnen-Review:

    Die Story ist solide, das Gameplay top. Manchmal gibt es hier und da kleine Fehler, z.B. das Gegner neben einem spawnen, weil man "falsch" abgebogen ist. Andererseits kann man, wenn man weiß wo die Gegner herkommen auch direkt eine Granate reinwerfen.
    Da ich nie gedient habe, geschweige denn im Krieg war, kann ich natürlich nur vermuten, dass das Spiel realistisch ist. Das Gefühl habe ich aber bekommen (außer in der letzten Mission, wo man ohne Atemschutz in ein brennendes Haus rennt, ohne umzukippen).
    Die Grafik ist auch heute noch sehr ansehnlich.

    Wenn man das Spiel durch hat, kann man es auf höheren Schwierigkeitsgraden wiederholen.
    Vielleicht tue ich das in ein paar Jahren, wenn ich alles wieder verdrängt habe.    … Expand
  76. Bottlecaps
    Mar 12, 2019
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. medal of honor warfighter when it was announced at E3 i was pretty pumped it looked good and the multiplayer looked like it was gonna mix up the call of duty formula just enough to make it familiar but also new. unfortunately looks seem to be the only thing this game has going for it.

    Story: the story is just your bog standard military shooter story , there is a terrorist and you have to stop him , there are some returning characters from medal of honor 2010 but they are so boring and un distinct that i didn't even realize they were returning characters until the name of your character from medal of honor 2010 was said . one of the returning characters dies witch all i could think when it happened was " ohh i guess the writers do want to take some risks " , in the multiplayer trailers they really pushed the multinational military and seemed to want to celebrate not just the united states military but other military's like Canada , Poland and Sweden so you would think the games story would reflect that ? but the main force you see is always united states.
    Story: 2/10

    World building : this world seems narrow and hallow the only bit of world building that seems to have been done was making dusty a cia operative. world building to me is what makes a games world feel real and a man moving up in a career is a very believable and the failing marriage of preacher adds to it as well but the thing was written so poorly i kinda laughed at it. and adding in other country's military could have went a long way in rectifying this , the potential was there for this one but the did not take it
    world building 2/10

    Graphics: the graphics are good, its one of the few things EA can boast about . EA usually disappoints me every time i play one of their games now a days in almost every aspect but graphics if i had to say anything bad about the graphics it would be that the animations feel a little clunky and there is very little style but a mute style usually services a realistic military shooter like this so it works
    graphics: 8/10

    Gameplay: its mostly a pretty standard game , they tried to mix it up a little bit with the breaching mechanic but a lot of those animations seemed impractical and i ended up just choosing witch ever animation was the quickest .Other than that you point you shoot you kill some bad guys and bam you've reached the end. its really all standard. i enjoyed playing it but only because i enjoy first person shooters
    Gameplay: 5/10

    sound design: the voice acting was actually pretty good and was something that slightly impressed me, even if i didn't care at all about these characters it actually felt like the voice actors did and that's a good thing . the guns and explosions sound pretty good but nothing to write home about. the music was forgettable, as in im struggling to even remember if there was music . other than the lack of music the sounds were pretty good
    Sound design: 5/10

    medal of honor is a worth while game if you can get it on sale for like 3-4 dollars and it will take up an afternoon or so , if a military shooter is what you want that's what you will get but don't expect anything ground breaking and this is certainly not a masterpiece

    2+2+8+5+5= 23
    23/5= 4.6 (i am rounding up to keep with the out of 10 on this website ( so 5/10 )    … Expand
  77. r03vg
    Apr 17, 2020
    7
    Хорошего немножко. Приятно играется, но локации кажутся слишком камерными. К тому же, сюжет кажется совсем простым и непроработанным.
  78. AMBO
    Feb 17, 2020
    7
    07/10......................................................................
  79. SurujSingha
    May 22, 2020
    5
    Very poorly written, the change of sequences and cutscenes are broken. While it did improve upon the previous MOH game by bringing in more variety in its campaign like the NFS inspired car sequences, but it isnt enough to redeem this franchise. Anyways, i must admit the graphics are satisfactory.
  80. apokalipto
    Aug 10, 2023
    8
    Very good game. I enjoyed playing this game a lot. I strongly recommend this.
  81. bar0yka
    Jan 14, 2023
    8
    spor arabayla kaçış sahnesi hala aklımda gayet güzel çizgisel bir oyundu ve grafikleri de çok iyiydi 7.5 vermek istedim ama o kadar maziye de sarı yakıştıramadım o yızden yeşili bastım aga
  82. Gorbunov2004
    Apr 3, 2021
    8
    Очень хорошая физика разрушений мне понравилось гонять на машинах это выглядит эпично но в 30 фпс так себе. Мне не понятно почему главный герой разговаривает в кат-сценах но не в самой игре. Оружия так же мало, сюжет средний.Очень хорошая физика разрушений мне понравилось гонять на машинах это выглядит эпично но в 30 фпс так себе. Мне не понятно почему главный герой разговаривает в кат-сценах но не в самой игре. Оружия так же мало, сюжет средний.
  83. Delta0138
    Jan 25, 2021
    8
    20$ on Origin. It is really very good. Animations are slick. AI is decent...something to be said these days...guns feel amazing...very realistic compared to almost all shooters these days. It unfortunately released during a time when COD and Battlefield were the titans. Nothing released could possibly beat them. Even Titanfall died trying, and it was 10x better than what both turned out to20$ on Origin. It is really very good. Animations are slick. AI is decent...something to be said these days...guns feel amazing...very realistic compared to almost all shooters these days. It unfortunately released during a time when COD and Battlefield were the titans. Nothing released could possibly beat them. Even Titanfall died trying, and it was 10x better than what both turned out to be. Solid game...worth the money. Cutscenes are TRASH quality, tho lol. No, not perfect, but definitely not rated correctly by most media outlets.… Expand
  84. DanichevOff
    Jun 14, 2021
    10
    Самая пронизывающая до глубины души военная драма, которая показывает суть войны и тех, кто отдаёт свою жизнь ради процветания
  85. The_D4RknesS
    Oct 4, 2022
    5
    The game is beautiful and has a nice destruction of scenarios but it has many visual bugs and the game does not allow you to play on easy because it closes alone, the accuracy of the weapons is also bad
  86. PenetratorGod
    Sep 1, 2023
    5
    Game of the series released in 2010 was not very good, but not mediocre. But I can't say the same for this game. It was a game that tried to copy BF3. Probably one of the main reasons why it was not successful was that it was not an original game.
  87. Giero
    Jan 3, 2023
    6
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  88. threeoftendie
    May 8, 2023
    7
    Я прошел эту игру больше 10 лет назад, но не могу вкратце не поделиться своим мнением о ней. Итак, вкратце - она достойна своих оценок. Думаю, не я один на протяжении прохождения столкнулся с багами и провисаниями - особенно провисаниями. Не знаю, может, все дело в моем компьютере или в целом в ПК-версии, что, как мы знаем, часто оказывается правдой, но для меня было бы риском запускать ееЯ прошел эту игру больше 10 лет назад, но не могу вкратце не поделиться своим мнением о ней. Итак, вкратце - она достойна своих оценок. Думаю, не я один на протяжении прохождения столкнулся с багами и провисаниями - особенно провисаниями. Не знаю, может, все дело в моем компьютере или в целом в ПК-версии, что, как мы знаем, часто оказывается правдой, но для меня было бы риском запускать ее еще раз. И вновь отмечу, что сюжет здесь (продолжение предыдущей игры) неплох, он драматичен, развивается в правильном темпе, подается через неплохие катсцены. Ах да, оружие и все, что с ним связано, тоже реализовано совсем неплохо. Но это все. других достоинств, как и недостатков, привести не могу, просто средний шутер, быстро забывающийся, заслуженно или незаслуженно забытый - решайте сами.… Expand
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

33
#33 Most Discussed PC Game of 2012
26
#26 Most Shared PC Game of 2012

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
55

Mixed or average reviews - based on 30 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 30
  2. Mixed: 23 out of 30
  3. Negative: 6 out of 30
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 2, 2012
    30
    Plot holes, broken scripting and offensive self-contradiction makes Warfighter one of the worst games we've played all year. [Dec 2012, p.85]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 30, 2012
    60
    Common military shooter with minor technical bugs shows all the elements we have seen before. We've expected much more from the legendary Medal of Honor series. [Dec 2012]
  3. CD-Action
    Nov 29, 2012
    50
    Due to unreliable scripts and other technical issues, bland and chaotic storytelling and stupid AI I played Warfighter strictly out of obligation and not for fun. Decent (but unbalanced) multiplayer is not enough to put other label than 'mediocre' on a game that was supposed to be a major hit. [13/2012, p.36]
See all critic reviews »