- Publisher: Tomorrow Corporation
- Release Date: Nov 19, 2012
- Also On: iPhone/iPad, Switch, Wii U
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 298 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 170 out of 298
-
Mixed: 101 out of 298
-
Negative: 27 out of 298
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Mar 17, 2013
-
Mar 16, 2013A ho hum indie game that set out to do something and did nothing. The 'gameplay' is watching things burn... it's basically an android game in terms of interaction. I get that some people find it fascinating but the reality is it shouldn't be more than a buck
-
May 28, 2013
-
Dec 26, 2012
-
Jan 30, 2013Little Inferno has good basic idea, but it doesn't prevent the frustration when you have played for a while: it gets very repetitive. Developers might have tried to do simple and fun game, but game is too simple and idea does not evolve during gameplay. It is the big minus. Maybe this game could be nice and simple for kids.
-
Nov 20, 2012
-
Jun 7, 2013
-
Aug 17, 2013
-
Sep 19, 2014Little Inferno starts with a bang and then fizzles into a gimmick of combining objects based on bad puns. I burned out on this game within an hour of lighting it up for the first time.
-
Oct 17, 2014
Awards & Rankings
-
PC PowerPlayFeb 6, 2013A short experiment based around a fairly oblique puzzle system, Litter Inferno succeeds as a compelling curio. [Feb 2013, p.75]
-
PC Master (Greece)Feb 4, 2013Little Inferno has a story to tell. It has neither beginning, nor end. It sports but a few characters, and does not care for correct narrative structure. It will leave you with plenty of questions, all of them unanswered. But it will accomplish what few games can. It will mesmerize you. It will awaken your imagination and force you to think of your own ending. It will move you and make you beg for more! [February 2013]
-
PC GamerFeb 1, 2013Little Inferno's argument against games I would never elect to play left me rather cold. [March 2013, p.79]