- Publisher: 3DO
- Release Date: Jun 19, 2001
Buy Now
| Buy on |
|
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
It is on the cusp of being a fun game, but the lack of editing capability and the omission of offline bots severely limit its replay value.
-
An unbalanced and unoriginal game that has been done better many times before.
-
Total Video GamesLoMaM isn’t a bad game it’s just unoriginal and stuck in mediocrity...lacks that little spark of magic to make it worth a purchase.
-
With wizards and warriors replacing terrorists and counterterrorists (a la "Counter-Strike"), the game ends up a mediocre muddle rather than the novel game it could have been.
-
A mediocre title that fails to make its mark in the annals of PC shooters. The developers drew off of a solid blueprint, but what you're left with in the end is an unexciting, lackadaisical "Counter-Strike" knock-off set in a fantasy world.
-
Legends isn't so much bad as brutally derivative. Fans of Counter-Strike will certainly find some fun within these castle walls, but ultimately will likely opt for a more legendary adventure.
-
A mediocre offering. While it has its fun moments, and some of the maps are intriguing, Legends ultimately comes across as lacking ingenuity.
-
Nothing more than a total cock-up, an uninventive and technically poor copy of several games, primarily Counter-Strike, which was meant to achieve a lot and actually achieved nothing.
-
A feeling of been there, done that, with some poor game design choices that limit the fun.
-
It's a shame that the whole thing seems so rushed and inexpertly executed.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 13 out of 19
-
Mixed: 3 out of 19
-
Negative: 3 out of 19
-
HampusE.Mar 24, 2004I think it`s good but not great.
-
JohnD.Apr 1, 2003This game rocks so for all the losers that rated this game 0 u suck.
-
RayM.Feb 24, 2003This game is utter crap. I paid 5 bucks for it and feel ripped.