User Score
4.2

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 76 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 76
  2. Negative: 45 out of 76

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Oct 23, 2014
    2
    This is a game that made me create an account here, simply because i was baffled about its high user score and lack of warning for potential buyers.

    Flashback - made by people who claim they loved the originals and were so disappointed that no company made a proper sequel they decided to do it themselves. Thing is, they missed the mark by as much as you can possibly miss it. The game is
    This is a game that made me create an account here, simply because i was baffled about its high user score and lack of warning for potential buyers.

    Flashback - made by people who claim they loved the originals and were so disappointed that no company made a proper sequel they decided to do it themselves. Thing is, they missed the mark by as much as you can possibly miss it. The game is truly bad, and this is coming from someone who doesn't mind playing bugged or not-so-pretty games as long as they have something going for them. This fails on virtually every level.

    Graphics. I know in a tactical game it doesn't matter all that much especially for fans of the genre. I agree with that. Problem is this game looks truly bad, think Silent Storm (which is over 10 years old, remember!) but not as pretty or as detailed. Add to that unreasonable system requirements and choppy framerate even at high end computers. The menus and ui look bland, font is poorly chosen, game view doesn't cut away walls, trees or any other obstacles so you constantly rotate the camera to see anything, which more often that not barely helps. It's just bad.

    Sound is there, that's about the only positive thing about it. Gunshots are most likely chosen from some cheap sounds library off the internet, character voices are mostly okay, especially the ones with accents. That being said some are truly horrific, for example 'Spirit' - she sounds like a broken cyborg from an old movie. Somewhat redeeming here is the music, which in some places is really nice, even if it isn't the kind you'd listen to outside of the game. It does the job and adds to the atmosphere.

    Gameplay. Oh dear me. This is the worst thing about the game. I don't mind streamlining features and simplifying combat for the sake of more fluid and faster paced action, i very much like UFO: Enemy Within. Problem is, this is much simpler technically and worse in pretty much every aspect. Enemy AI is shocking, they use maybe four tactics to... well, i don't really know what they're trying to do, because it isn't winning fights - of that i'm sure. They either run straight at your guys who are prone and mowing them down one after another, or they stay miles back outside your sight range and take 0% hitchance potshots at You, or, most sensibly, they sometimes will go prone near cover and try to duke it out. Even if they have a pistol and that cover is 20 tiles away from you which does them no good at all. There are times when one bright spark will accidentally find decent cover at an angle and is able to hit your men, but i suspect that's purely by chance that the cover was there and he just happened upon it, not that he chose it as a tactically viable position. Sometimes they run back and forth like headless chicken, out of cover, few steps here or there and then back behind the same cover without even firing. It's embarrasing and sad to watch, and the only way they can harm you is by attrition and the fact that sometimes, especially early on, you simply cannot kill them fast enough even as they run at your much better armed squad.
    Now, weapon balance. For the most part it isn't actually so bad, except... If, like me, you happen to find a M82A1 Barrett on 4th map (!!!), you'll think to yourself 'aha, now you evil soldiers are so dead you won't even know how dead you'll be when i kill you with my silly powerful rifle!', and you'll be sadly mistaken. .50 cal sniper rifle is barely more effective than an old Russian RPK light machinegun.
    There is no tactical depth, cover system is unintuitive and badly implemented - in XCOM your guys peeked out to fire and went back smoothly and sensibly. Here this doesn't happen, if You hide behind high cover You have to get out, shoot and go back wasting points and time on moving and turning towards enemy every single damn time. It's tedious, unnecessary and makes no sense. There is also no height advantage to be had, stealth is virtually non-existant unless You count going around building and shooting enemies in the back during combat itself.
    Inventory is not bad suprisingly, but stats, skills and all the information are crammed into that one screen which just goes to show the lack of depth. The game is barren, item descriptions are barely there, weapon names are of course fake and not as funny as developer thought they would be.

    There is also plenty of typos and the whole game feels clunky, cursors get stuck all the time, there is no quicksave system and the whole thing feels like an early beta.
    One positive thing i suppose is the fact that i haven't encountered any game-breaking bugs with quests being stuck etc.

    Summing up, this is one of the worst tactical games i've ever played, and more insulting when you consider it bears Jagged Alliance logo. Even worse, you pay full price for a game that feels unfinished at best. If you like tactical shooters stick to old JA2, Silent Storm, 7.62 High Calibre with Blue Sun Mod or even XCOM. I wish i had.
    Expand
  2. Apr 6, 2015
    4
    The game feels and looks unfinished. Lots has been promised, not much made it in to release. I just don´t get why I see 8 and 9 point reviews here stating that the developer has promised to put things in. A game has to be judged as it is at the time of its release, and in its current form, it is simply neither good, feature-complete or fun. I wish it was different, but thats how it is.The game feels and looks unfinished. Lots has been promised, not much made it in to release. I just don´t get why I see 8 and 9 point reviews here stating that the developer has promised to put things in. A game has to be judged as it is at the time of its release, and in its current form, it is simply neither good, feature-complete or fun. I wish it was different, but thats how it is.

    The graphics are ok, not stunning or anything near it, but ok. What really is a huge turn-off for me is the complete fail at user interface and polishing. (Beside the lack of features and soul). Why forcing people into a click orgy nowadays? For example, I don´t want to click stance buttons to peek out of cover and go back in cover EVERYTIME I shoot at someone. Smooth gameplay is important, and if a game annoys me with it´s controls and UI its just not fun for me. Enemy AI is A but not I. Really, they are just no challenge.

    Sigh. I could go on writing negatively on this, but really, I just want to sum it up: Put Flashback and JA2 side by side and see whats more fun. Why is it so hard to learn from Silent Storm, X-Com and the likes and see what was good and successful with gamers recently?

    Maybe things change in the near or distant future, but right now I suggest to wait if and how this game develops before buying this at the full price.
    Expand
  3. Oct 25, 2014
    2
    Alot has already been written about the, for the most part horribly broken game mechanics and lack of essential features and I couldn't agree more with these complains. Leaving actual gameplay aside for a second, I'm especially disappointed with the lack of details and the totally unintuitive and lifeless background story. You know, with JA1 and JA2, you could literally feel the love andAlot has already been written about the, for the most part horribly broken game mechanics and lack of essential features and I couldn't agree more with these complains. Leaving actual gameplay aside for a second, I'm especially disappointed with the lack of details and the totally unintuitive and lifeless background story. You know, with JA1 and JA2, you could literally feel the love and passion that developers put into virtually every aspect of the games, be it the immersive story, the individual mercs and NPCs or even the suspenesful background music. Sadly, ALL of this is completely absent in JA:Flashback.

    The game just feels so shallow and soulless that you can't help but feel the devs just wanted to be done with it and move on, which begs the question why they bothered to make it in the first place. To be honest, I'm really tired of sub-par game studios tarnishing the brand name of poor old Jagged Alliance. So all in all, if you thought things couldn't get any worse than JA:BIA, then sadly you were mistaken.
    Expand
  4. Oct 23, 2014
    3
    There is no point to write again what Thrillseeker wrote, because its all truth from start to end
    I just add when I played this game I said "fuking piece of shiat" 100x and I was not believing that this is that game it was promised from jagged alliance fans to jagged alliance fans ....
    Full Control Said that they are out of money(why do you want to start project when you have not
    There is no point to write again what Thrillseeker wrote, because its all truth from start to end
    I just add when I played this game I said "fuking piece of shiat" 100x and I was not believing that this is that game it was promised from jagged alliance fans to jagged alliance fans ....

    Full Control Said that they are out of money(why do you want to start project when you have not enought money to make it is mistery to me) and will finish game only if it is selling well --good luck! To sell this piece of trash to some poor souls who have no idea how bad this game is
    I backed 50 euro on kickstarter ...never again ...its becasue of companies like Full Conbtrol that kickstarter is less and less trustworthy
    I want refund, devs clearly failed to deliver product mentioned in kickstarter and not only something is missing, 50% of game is missing, its unfixable by some guns attachments/soviet weapon pack DLC, game clearly need another year of development which will never happen
    DO NOT BUY JAGGED ALLIANCE FLASHBACK
    Expand
  5. Oct 24, 2014
    2
    Одназначно, недоразумение года по моей личной версии. Недоделанная игра, огрызок гейпмлея и близко не валявшийся рядом с великой второй частью, которая была взята за ориентир. Именно "как в старом добром втором+некоторые фичи из 1.13" обещали разработчики. А на деле? Мы получили нечто, уступающее игровому процессу даже первой части jagged alliance-а , вышедшей в 1994 году.
    Очень сложно
    Одназначно, недоразумение года по моей личной версии. Недоделанная игра, огрызок гейпмлея и близко не валявшийся рядом с великой второй частью, которая была взята за ориентир. Именно "как в старом добром втором+некоторые фичи из 1.13" обещали разработчики. А на деле? Мы получили нечто, уступающее игровому процессу даже первой части jagged alliance-а , вышедшей в 1994 году.
    Очень сложно поверить, что эти скромные с виду, мило улыбающиеся нерды из Дании, так жестко кинули всех донатеров, проедая и пропивая сначала овер 380к $, а потом еще надкусив пирога с раннего доступа. И еще сейчас поживятся на бренде серии.
    Кучу всего нериализовано, что было обещано. Наемники из второй части, которые никаким образом не могут быть на острове, если следовать канонам вселенной 9(какой ,нафиг, бык в Сан ♥♥♥♥♥♥манос, если у него во второй части 1 уровень опыта (он новичек организации), он не был в первой части , и вообще, не имел боевого опыта до Арулько?!), вместо более логичных ветеранов первой серии... Ворох вопросов по гейплею, кучу наплевательски выпеленых фич, которые божились сделать.
    Позор. Кидалово. Эпик фэйл. Выкидыш огрызка игры (это все еще альфа версия, по хорошему), дурной тон. Тоны кирпичей.
    Expand
  6. Oct 31, 2014
    1
    Failed Com, these guys are living in a separate universe from the rest of the world, for delivering this amateurish JA wannabe, FC claimed to have ran out of money, if its the case why was the KS successful at 350k, clearly FC does not have a clue how to run a biz with inherent poor management and budgeting skills game is sure to fail, the release version is the same as the alpha andFailed Com, these guys are living in a separate universe from the rest of the world, for delivering this amateurish JA wannabe, FC claimed to have ran out of money, if its the case why was the KS successful at 350k, clearly FC does not have a clue how to run a biz with inherent poor management and budgeting skills game is sure to fail, the release version is the same as the alpha and pre-release with just minor tweaks after all u only get the combat system everything else is dumb down e.g. graphics (low resolution), poor sound quality, pathetic animations, souless mercs, UI taking up most of the screen, dumb AI, the list goes on, how anyone is able to spend hours playing this is a mystery.

    If u really want it, wait for it this to be reduced to bargain prices i.e. 5 bucks before picking it and save your hard earn money.
    Expand
  7. Oct 27, 2014
    3
    I just ALT+F4 out of it in annoyance. The enemy goes prone behind a block and you cannot actually shoot at him (No line of sight) and yet, he can lie behind that block, and shoot through it with ace accuracy. At the same time, a guy will run up to you, and he is at the next tile. In other words, at point blank range, you have a 51% chance of shooting someone in the face or a 21% change ofI just ALT+F4 out of it in annoyance. The enemy goes prone behind a block and you cannot actually shoot at him (No line of sight) and yet, he can lie behind that block, and shoot through it with ace accuracy. At the same time, a guy will run up to you, and he is at the next tile. In other words, at point blank range, you have a 51% chance of shooting someone in the face or a 21% change of punching him in the face. If you miss, your character is basically dead. This is not fun in the slightest. Good attempt but a total failure. Expand
  8. Jan 8, 2015
    2
    After the recent update 50 on the KS,it was what compelled me to sign up and review the. The developer Full Control, in what seems like a very desperate move. Writes an update which begs players to positively review a game on Steam which frankly does'nt deserve a 5/10. I've never seen a game developer reach a level of desperation which they are compelled to beg for good reviews and on topAfter the recent update 50 on the KS,it was what compelled me to sign up and review the. The developer Full Control, in what seems like a very desperate move. Writes an update which begs players to positively review a game on Steam which frankly does'nt deserve a 5/10. I've never seen a game developer reach a level of desperation which they are compelled to beg for good reviews and on top of that blame members of the community for their bad reviews and label them as "outsiders" If Jagged Alliance Flashback would have received the proper love and funding it deserves there would be no need to go out and beg for good reviews. You done **** it up and having reviewers sex up the reviews on Steam seems massively unethical.

    As for the game,if you love prior chapters of the Jagged Alliance you are in for a disappointment. The game lacks all of the depth and fun previous JAF titles contained. The worlds are empty,devoid of life,the story is idiotic and the AI are atrocious. Buyer Beware,if you want a good turned based combat game,there are plenty better titles available,from developers who do not treat their customers with the contempt FC does.
    Expand
  9. Jan 24, 2015
    4
    TL/DR: Just buy and play the original Jagged Alliance 2 with the community patch.

    The devs are trying to fix the issues with the game and have addressed most of the seriious flaws of the initial release and i respect that, but its still not a game i would pay 30 Euros for when alternatives are cheaper and better. Pro: * Graphics are quite ok * Moddability * Devs fixing issues with
    TL/DR: Just buy and play the original Jagged Alliance 2 with the community patch.

    The devs are trying to fix the issues with the game and have addressed most of the seriious flaws of the initial release and i respect that, but its still not a game i would pay 30 Euros for when alternatives are cheaper and better.

    Pro:
    * Graphics are quite ok
    * Moddability
    * Devs fixing issues with the game

    Contra:
    * Lacking Content and Immersion
    * Feels dumbed down
    * Too expensive for its content (30 Euro on Steam at the moment)
    * Overall not better than a 15 year old game which they tried to reinvent and can be bought for 20 Euro on Steam
    * Developer feels treated unfairly and begs for positive reviews and on top of that calls users giving negative reviews "a small rabid core group" when they should have not released a bug-ridden game in the first place
    Expand
  10. Dec 14, 2014
    0
    This game was released feature incomplete, it is lacking all of the attributes of a title in the Jagged Alliance franchise. The combat is boring and repetitive, the AI is stupid, the camera and arena sizes are tiny, the overall map is small, the interactions between mercs do not really exist, the list goes on ..

    Also, modders have colluded to manipulate metacritic and steam reviews,
    This game was released feature incomplete, it is lacking all of the attributes of a title in the Jagged Alliance franchise. The combat is boring and repetitive, the AI is stupid, the camera and arena sizes are tiny, the overall map is small, the interactions between mercs do not really exist, the list goes on ..

    Also, modders have colluded to manipulate metacritic and steam reviews, because they have an agreement with the publisher to deliver missing functionality and content .. ultimately via paid DLCs

    This is an awful mess both in terms of delivery and end product.

    Buyer beware.
    Expand
  11. Apr 9, 2015
    3
    3/10 is the fairest rating for this game because it's not finished, yet something in it more or less works. The 3D models look ok, and the music is good, but the rest is incomplete. The controls are clumsy, sometimes clicks don't select a merc, the camera only rotates at 90 grad, you can't properly zoom out, and the map is not informative enough. The GUI looks cheap, fonts are of different3/10 is the fairest rating for this game because it's not finished, yet something in it more or less works. The 3D models look ok, and the music is good, but the rest is incomplete. The controls are clumsy, sometimes clicks don't select a merc, the camera only rotates at 90 grad, you can't properly zoom out, and the map is not informative enough. The GUI looks cheap, fonts are of different size, sometimes too small and always blurred. The sound effects are frequently out of place (e.g. when you crouch you hear a sound as if you equip something). After going back to real-time mode all characters stand up even if the battle is yet unfinished - that's annoying. Many mercs from JA are missing. Actually, a lot of stuff is missing. It's kind of an amateurishly made, super stripped-down and simplified JA2. There is no reason why anyone should buy this game, and frankly I wonder how those guys are even selling it. JA2 is one of the greatest games of all time, and this one is just another disastrous attempt at a remake in 3D. Expand
  12. May 19, 2021
    2
    One common, and admittedly useful, feature of strategy games is the ability to locate and identify enemy units on the map. Knowing where they are will allow you to decide where to move your own units, where to hide them, what covers to use, where to launch your holy grenades, and so on.
    In JA:F, it took me several minutes to locate the very first enemy who took a shot at my units. The UI
    One common, and admittedly useful, feature of strategy games is the ability to locate and identify enemy units on the map. Knowing where they are will allow you to decide where to move your own units, where to hide them, what covers to use, where to launch your holy grenades, and so on.
    In JA:F, it took me several minutes to locate the very first enemy who took a shot at my units. The UI doesn't provide the bare minimum. Glad the thing is turn-based...
    Expand
Metascore
52

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 10
  2. Negative: 5 out of 10
  1. CD-Action
    Feb 7, 2015
    50
    Jagged Alliance 2 is old and ugly, but its gameplay still blows Flashback out of the water. [01/2015, p.78]
  2. Jan 25, 2015
    45
    I should also point out unpleasant visuals, crappy voice-over work, horrendous pathfinding and sloppy UI, but it all simply adds injury to the insult, since, first and foremost, JA: Flashback fails as a tactical strategy game.
  3. Pelit (Finland)
    Dec 15, 2014
    75
    Jagged Alliance Flashback resurrects the classic game, unfortunately only as a skeleton. I hope that some day the flesh, muscles and soul will be added. [Dec 2014]