Iron Harvest

 PC
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 53 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 31 out of 53
  2. Mixed: 22 out of 53
  3. Negative: 0 out of 53
  1. IGN
    Sep 1, 2020
    If the RTS is dead, then Iron Harvest is some pretty slick necromancy. A classic-style single-player campaign with a strong story complements the absolute satisfaction of big, stompy mechs. [Single Player Score = 80]
  2. Rock, Paper, Shotgun
    Sep 17, 2020
    Iron Harvest is a throwback to one of the last golden ages of the genre, often feeling as old fashioned and crusty as that association entails, but frequently reminding us of the essential appeal of extremely large robots chilling out in timelines where they shouldn’t be.

Awards & Rankings

58
#58 Most Discussed PC Game of 2020

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
6.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 178 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 92 out of 178
  2. Mixed: 46 out of 178
  3. Negative: 40 out of 178
  1. norberci
    Sep 2, 2020
    4
    This is still beta - wait a couple of months, because this game needs truckload of polish. And wait for a big sale, right now it's prices likeThis is still beta - wait a couple of months, because this game needs truckload of polish. And wait for a big sale, right now it's prices like an AAA title - which it clearly isn't. Frame rate is underwhelming on my rig - with 5 units on screen it feels like Total War with hundreds. The quality of Polish voice over is amateurish. And I hate the fact I have to finish the campaign with one faction to play with another, terrible, terrible design choice.… Full Review »
  2. PrplHze
    Sep 3, 2020
    3
    Problem is the game is "Full Released" with missing features, Devs waited 30hrs to respond with Roadmap, with Subject to change.

    50$ for a    Problem is the game is "Full Released" with missing features, Devs waited 30hrs to respond with Roadmap, with Subject to change.

    50$ for a EA game thats not going to be finished for least 2 months just to get the advertised features done. I rated a 3, for 1/3 game. Cause nothing is ever 10 thats just silly    … Full Review »
  3. kn03ee
    Sep 2, 2020
    3
    As a Kickstarter baker and early alpha/beta tester, I cannot recommend this game to anyone at its current status. The graphic and art designAs a Kickstarter baker and early alpha/beta tester, I cannot recommend this game to anyone at its current status. The graphic and art design of the game is great but beside campaign, the game lacks of descent strategies and system. Similar/identical infantry units for each faction, lacking unit/weapon upgrades, lack of base building elements(only 2 base structures, same on every faction as well), claims to be a slow pace RTS but its not, etc.

    More importantly, the dev “full” released the game with many key features missing/not implemented in the game yet. There are no new maps since the beta, no rank play or ladder, no coop campaign/missions, no AI improvements, no steam achievements and so on.

    This is extremely disappointing. Despite many players provide their suggestions and warnings to the dev before the full release, the dev barely changes or improves any aspects of the game. If the dev wants to keep improving or fixing the game overtime, they should brand the game as an early access title instead of publishing an unfinished game.

    As a baker, I’m really disappointed and would not recommend this game for now to anyone who is interested.    … Full Review »
See all user reviews »