User Score
4.8

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 729 Ratings

User score distribution:

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. May 18, 2023
    1
    Its not the violance that i am against, no i enjoy that really much, is it killing civilians that made me give 1 point ? No i enjoy that very much on GTA games. IT IS **** CAMERA ANGLE THAT MADE ME GIVE 1 POINTS TO THIS **** GAME! LETS GIVE HIM 381244214214151551 POLICE UNITS AND FIXED 52 DEGREE ANGLED CAMERA TO DEAL WITH THEM. I enjoyed killing very much if they were to add a story orIts not the violance that i am against, no i enjoy that really much, is it killing civilians that made me give 1 point ? No i enjoy that very much on GTA games. IT IS **** CAMERA ANGLE THAT MADE ME GIVE 1 POINTS TO THIS **** GAME! LETS GIVE HIM 381244214214151551 POLICE UNITS AND FIXED 52 DEGREE ANGLED CAMERA TO DEAL WITH THEM. I enjoyed killing very much if they were to add a story or movable camera angle i would have voted like a 6 or something idk but **** game overall yea. Expand
  2. May 15, 2023
    4
    Скучно, пресно, безыдейно. Постал на минималках.
  3. Sep 18, 2022
    3
    Pues no vale para nada. Me llamó mucho la atención cuando en su día lo anunciaron, por el morbo y el tema insano de masacrar inocentes sin discreción, pero más allá de los primeros minutos y la impresión inicial de encarnar a un psicópata asesino de masas, el juego es insulso y repetitivo.

    Simplemente vas avanzando por diferentes zonas con un objetivo numérico de individuos masacrados.
    Pues no vale para nada. Me llamó mucho la atención cuando en su día lo anunciaron, por el morbo y el tema insano de masacrar inocentes sin discreción, pero más allá de los primeros minutos y la impresión inicial de encarnar a un psicópata asesino de masas, el juego es insulso y repetitivo.

    Simplemente vas avanzando por diferentes zonas con un objetivo numérico de individuos masacrados. A medida que vas matando aparecen oleadas de enemigos que son las fuerzas de seguridad, cada vez mejor armados y protegidos para acabar contigo. Lo que lo convierte en un twin stick shooter muy sencillo de masacre por oleadas. En este punto hay que comentar que el juego es solo parcialmente compatible con un game pad, por lo que tendrás que jugarlo con teclado y ratón y es impreciso hasta decir basta, por lo que de twin stick shooter, en realidad, es solo sobre el papel. Como gracia adicional en los diferentes niveles hay objetivos secundarios en los que encontrar nuevas armas, chalecos antibalas o puntos de respawn, que básicamente hacen las veces de vidas. Si terminas las vidas en una zona vuelves a empezar desde el principio con tu objetivo de masacre principal. Sin más, no tiene más.

    Hay gente que le recuerda a Postal. Un juego que en los noventa llamó mucho la atención por partir de una premisa similar a este. Por lo que, en mi opinión pierde el factor de innovación en su concepción argumental, es decir, ni siquiera es original, es una copia de un clásico. Por lo que… a no ser que te llamara la atención por que eres un pifiado de los videojuegos y te diera morbo su premisa y además lo encuentres a precio de derribo…. (yo no pagaría más de 2€ por esto) puedes ahorrártelo, no te va a aportar nada. Al menos nada que no se haya visto ya mejor hecho.
    Expand
  4. Aug 11, 2022
    0
    Hatred is one of the most insulting games of all time.

    I don't mean offensive or shocking or anything like that. I mean downright insulting to your intelligence. Firstly, the gameplay is garbage. The controls suck, the shooting feels completely unsatisfying and lacking in impact, the difficulty is massively inflated because the developers just thought 'oh yeah let's just throw
    Hatred is one of the most insulting games of all time.

    I don't mean offensive or shocking or anything like that.

    I mean downright insulting to your intelligence.

    Firstly, the gameplay is garbage. The controls suck, the shooting feels completely unsatisfying and lacking in impact, the difficulty is massively inflated because the developers just thought 'oh yeah let's just throw **** a bazillion enemies in' and the gameplay loop is so boring, uninspired and repetitive that I think I would rather play Hunt Down the Freeman.

    Then there's the story. Edgy isn't quite the right word to describe it. **** moronic is more what I like to say. It wants to appeal to those annoying **** that act as if everyone is a terrible person and we should just commit genocide because isn't that just such a mature, thought provoking, well thought out idea?

    Yeah you can not convince me that the devs of this game have ever had a normal conversation with another person outside of circle jerking with other edgy kids on **** about how much they hate the world.

    So **** gameplay paired with an insufferable, irritating story.

    Imagine you took the first Postal game and removed all the impact, thought, self awareness and substance, and you'd get this game.

    Overall, **** game with nothing of value for anyone who isn't an insufferable **** who hates everything because they think it makes them mature
    Expand
  5. Jul 1, 2022
    2
    The guy who created the game was really mad , the game is full of bugs and it still kills innocent people for no reason... The only thing I liked was the black white graphic
  6. Jun 11, 2022
    4
    qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
  7. May 22, 2021
    3
    The game-makers managed to write their tutorial texts in a way that makes them impossible to read. No wonder then that the general visibility is awful (black and white was a poor idea, off-screen people killing you was a terrible idea,) the gamepad control scheme is impractical and cannot be changed, and of course the game does not provide the entertaining ability to save progress duringThe game-makers managed to write their tutorial texts in a way that makes them impossible to read. No wonder then that the general visibility is awful (black and white was a poor idea, off-screen people killing you was a terrible idea,) the gamepad control scheme is impractical and cannot be changed, and of course the game does not provide the entertaining ability to save progress during missions, which means its entertainment value is a big fat ZERO. Expand
  8. Apr 1, 2021
    1
    Clickbait: The Video Game. And all the stupid press took the bait like a freakin morons they are. This game fails as shooter, or arcade. Its just filled with cringe that that tries to be funny and over the top. Don't buy this trash.
  9. Feb 20, 2021
    4
    I have no problem with a game like this, that is not the reason I am giving this a negative review.

    If you look at it, Hatred was pretty much a publicity stunt for a new studio to get controversy to get money, and... it worked. People hopped on this game to defend its content matter, when really neither the content matter or gameplay is even that good. Many issues like low framerate,
    I have no problem with a game like this, that is not the reason I am giving this a negative review.

    If you look at it, Hatred was pretty much a publicity stunt for a new studio to get controversy to get money, and... it worked. People hopped on this game to defend its content matter, when really neither the content matter or gameplay is even that good.

    Many issues like low framerate, graphical glitches, execution glitches, terrible camera position, bad voice acting from the main character, and stupid AI hold it back from being really good.

    I get that they were going for a Postal style game here, with the camera locked in a overhead view. However, Postal did it because of how it was designed. This game could have easily been modified to be played in 3rd person. The main character sounds like someone trying to force themselves to act 'edgy', and 'threaten'. Why the AI runs back into the same house their buddy was just shot it destroys the whole point of people 'scared for their life.'

    Somethings are done right, like the environmental destruction, voicing acting of the civilians and executions, to a certain extend.

    One thing that was also blown way out of portion was the executions. They are supposed to be this gnarly showcase of dying in the worse possible way, but I've seen better, and even more gruesome executions in games like Manhunt 2, and The Punisher.

    Hatred can be enjoyable, but I find that the game is more of a publicity stunt, then an actual game.
    Expand
  10. Feb 8, 2021
    3
    It's not that Hatred goes too far, it's that the game is sold on being edgy or violent, but the "violence" is so dull that I can't really believe the game is rated AO. Why is the game less violent than your average Assassins Creed game, but is being sold as this senseless violence simulator? A game like this really shouldn't be pulling its punches, and it's led to a disappointing endIt's not that Hatred goes too far, it's that the game is sold on being edgy or violent, but the "violence" is so dull that I can't really believe the game is rated AO. Why is the game less violent than your average Assassins Creed game, but is being sold as this senseless violence simulator? A game like this really shouldn't be pulling its punches, and it's led to a disappointing end result. Honestly, just play Postal 2 instead. Expand
  11. Oct 29, 2020
    2
    The most terrific game, that I have ever seen. Stupid AI, bad animations, terrible optimization, color gamma is awful, and the absence of storyline at all. The gameplay is so boring that the only thing that you want - to end this game as fast as you can. The main character has no motivation and he kills people just because he is evil.
    It is one of the worst games that I have ever played.
  12. Sep 2, 2020
    2
    In all honesty 90% of this game's fame is based purely on its famous controversy. Without this coating - its just a generic shooter. Grab it if discounted to check 'what's all about'. Otherwise - don't bother.
  13. May 16, 2020
    4
    Скучно, плохая оптимизиация, не интересно, выглядит уродливо
  14. Apr 26, 2020
    0
    That's probaly the MOST violent and disgusting game EVER. The developers must be arrested for that game.
  15. Jan 28, 2019
    3
    The mechanics in this game are a joke and if it didn't boast with the sick and twisted moral code nobody would even know this trash game.
  16. Aug 16, 2018
    3
    A despicable title that tries to stagger to it's feet with false claims of over the top cruelty and controversial killings. If you're truly interested in hardcore, brutal violence, you won't find it here. The game is comparably tame to what expectations the public had, offering nothing new to veteran gamers. Indeed, if you've played GTA, Saint's Row, or even Dishonored, you honestly won'tA despicable title that tries to stagger to it's feet with false claims of over the top cruelty and controversial killings. If you're truly interested in hardcore, brutal violence, you won't find it here. The game is comparably tame to what expectations the public had, offering nothing new to veteran gamers. Indeed, if you've played GTA, Saint's Row, or even Dishonored, you honestly won't find the death included in Hatred very interesting.

    Let's say you're not invested in the violence; what about game play? What you have is essentially an old-school top-down shooter/bullet hell. Is it new, flavorful, or innovative in any way? No, not really. If you're new to the genre then you may be able to extract some semblance of enjoyment from Hatred, but you're honestly better off just playing a free flash game online that has similar gameplay.

    It's clear that the dirty developers played up the controversy for sales, most likely knowing that the game would perform poorly if they didn't drum up some kind of gimmick. I will admit, it's current price tag of around $7.00 is a bit high, but not too far from unreasonable. If you must purchase the game, wait for a 50% off sale or just playing something else, except better.
    Expand
  17. Jun 2, 2018
    4
    If you want a senseless kill everybody type of game, Hatred may be for you, but it is not something you play in more than a handful of seating. Repetitive, underwhelming and disappointing.
  18. May 30, 2018
    3
    It's a violent game...
    and that is all...
    The mechanics are good, but I don't play violent videogames just because they are violent, i want a story, a context or a motive to kill. The game is bad because is boring, it was made just to create controversy, a main character flat, and because is just violent. About why Postal 2 is better: First and the most important, the game is not
    It's a violent game...
    and that is all...

    The mechanics are good, but I don't play violent videogames just because they are violent, i want a story, a context or a motive to kill.

    The game is bad because is boring, it was made just to create controversy, a main character flat, and because is just violent.

    About why Postal 2 is better: First and the most important, the game is not dark, Postal 2 is pure black mood, the game doesn't have a story but at least i have objectives that made me interact with the environment, people, etc. And there are a lot of more reasons.

    Hatred is just a violent game.

    3/10.

    Go to play Postal 2 instead hatred.
    Expand
  19. Mar 13, 2016
    1
    Hatred is a **** game.
    You play as an emo **** dressed like Eric Harris.
    The only reason why this is sort of popular is its "controversy" but compare it to classics like Postal and its "controversy" is down the **** The game is short and the developers dare to sell it for more than 30 dollars even 30 dollars would be over the top for this kind of **** game. The gameplays **** boring
    Hatred is a **** game.
    You play as an emo **** dressed like Eric Harris.
    The only reason why this is sort of popular is its "controversy" but compare it to classics like Postal and its "controversy" is down the ****
    The game is short and the developers dare to sell it for more than 30 dollars even 30 dollars would be over the top for this kind of **** game.
    The gameplays **** boring "the only 4 levels is only kill kill kill" with a **** ending. People think that cutting someones throat deserves most controversial game of 2015
    Well the game itself is a top down shooter in black and white which i kinda like. Reminds me of Smash TV.
    But anyone who gives it more than 4 didnt **** play the game and realize how **** it is.
    Expand
  20. Nov 15, 2015
    4
    Hatred is suppose to be a dark and gritty game that puts players in the role of The Crusader as he embarks on a killing spree. However, everything about Hatred was built on the controversy and hype while the context fails at any point to make the player feel disturbed by their actions. This game could have been a unique experience if it was released anytime from 1996 - 2005, when suchHatred is suppose to be a dark and gritty game that puts players in the role of The Crusader as he embarks on a killing spree. However, everything about Hatred was built on the controversy and hype while the context fails at any point to make the player feel disturbed by their actions. This game could have been a unique experience if it was released anytime from 1996 - 2005, when such titles were a popular way to stick it to anti-video game activists like Jack Thompson. Expand
  21. Aug 17, 2015
    1
    Go around and shoot people and the dev doesn't want to be politically correct and put aside the games as art concept. Filled with philosophical and a great artistic approach make all the irony in this game. The graphics are the only good thing about it. It gets boring within the first 15 minutes.
  22. Aug 5, 2015
    3
    Doesn't matter to me if you kill al mankind, the problem is the gameplay and its too repetitive the same sh it everytime kill, kill, kill and guess what? More kill! Its too way boring not recomend because of that.
  23. Aug 1, 2015
    1
    Let's establish a few facts, I played and enjoyed games like Postal (youtube 'postal cat silencer') and GTA.

    I played Hatred with an open mind, because this is a game and the only things that matter is gameplay, story and/or fun. Gameplay: Few actual mechanics to the game and most of them are poorly executed, as an example, camera angle makes it hard to gauge whether your enemy is
    Let's establish a few facts, I played and enjoyed games like Postal (youtube 'postal cat silencer') and GTA.

    I played Hatred with an open mind, because this is a game and the only things that matter is gameplay, story and/or fun.

    Gameplay: Few actual mechanics to the game and most of them are poorly executed, as an example, camera angle makes it hard to gauge whether your enemy is within Line of Sight or if you are just looking into a wall/door. Aiming down sight moves your entire screen/cross-hair, which makes aiming for difficult and the increased precision is irrelevant.

    Storyline: Non-existent.

    Fun: The game takes the whole massacre thing way too seriously and unlike other games similar violence level, doesn't have anything else in it's favor other than random killing, which makes the game boring.

    Graphics: The atmosphere is appropriate to the setting however the animations are subpar.

    In conclusion, it seems that positive reviews rest on the single fact that 'killing is fun' in the game, but personally, killing just for killing without anything else (comedy factor, plot, etc) adding to it, is just boring.
    Expand
  24. Jul 27, 2015
    0
    Pros:
    Looks decent

    Cons:
    THIS GAME F***ING SUCKS
    The game has plenty of glitches like the highway fall-through-the-floor glitch
    The game gets across a bad message, "genocide is fun" IT'S NOT

    Final verdict: The only hatred in this game is mine for it
  25. Jul 25, 2015
    0
    Let me tell you something,brother,Hatred is a game that you DON'T want your child to play.The game is what we call it in my country,a massive piece of **** is all that you don't want to see in a game,and I,as a experienced gamer can say that this game should not be made,EVER.I don't recommend Hatred to anyone.
  26. Jul 19, 2015
    0
    its a game about staring a massacre like GTA but in GTA its a choice some games like this are too far with all the killings these days a game like this horrible
  27. Jul 12, 2015
    3
    The game that has no goal could be fun,like minecraft.But the game is absolutely stupid and it is only known for the controversie,not fort the actual gameplay.
  28. Jul 9, 2015
    0
    This is just a sadism style game that was freely promoted by the internet and media outlets. Its hype was built off controversy and was easily fell for by people in defense and YouTuber's who wanted subs. Good game or bad, we need to stop hyping games up that just want money or just want the attention for free advertising. Small indie game or not, companies are famous for this...this isThis is just a sadism style game that was freely promoted by the internet and media outlets. Its hype was built off controversy and was easily fell for by people in defense and YouTuber's who wanted subs. Good game or bad, we need to stop hyping games up that just want money or just want the attention for free advertising. Small indie game or not, companies are famous for this...this is just another lesson. Expand
  29. Jul 5, 2015
    1
    First and foremost, the low grade is not due to me being a finger-waggling and "oh how could you" spouting person who doesn't understand how mowing down rows of innocent bystanders could be fun. Quite the opposite, I was one of those that saw the trailers, saw the mowing down of people and went howling into the night how much I want it because it actually does look like fun. You know, fun?First and foremost, the low grade is not due to me being a finger-waggling and "oh how could you" spouting person who doesn't understand how mowing down rows of innocent bystanders could be fun. Quite the opposite, I was one of those that saw the trailers, saw the mowing down of people and went howling into the night how much I want it because it actually does look like fun. You know, fun? Remember that? What we used to play games for? Before it became a second job (like the MMO du jour) or an excuse for not doing our first one (like the Facebook timewaster games). Fun.

    And that's exactly what the game fails at. It makes mowing down innocent victims and bystanders who have done nothing wrong but getting out of bed in the morning and getting in the path of our antisocial protagonist at exactly the wrong time not only boring but a chore. That's a feat and a half if you think about it.

    Lemme be level here, it starts out ok. You start the game, you walk down the street, blazing guns mow down a couple dozen innocent victims. Nothing wrong so far, all fun and game, we're building character here... or wait, we don't. First of all, there is exactly zero emotional attachment to our protagonist. He's as blank as the average angsty goth teen (which is, I'd wager, coincidentally the target audience of the game, after all you SHOULD somehow identify with your character) whose outlook on life and the reaction he garners from anyone dealing with him is the same: A heartfelt MEH.

    There's simply no motivation. But that's fine, that's ok, hey, who needs a game to motivate you to mow down a dozen human beings or a score? Maybe your life or at least your day already gave you enough of a motivation for this and you doing it in a computer game is just your way of doing it in a socially halfway acceptable way. That's ok, that's cool.

    But, and that's the part where I get pissed off, the fatal flaw of the game, the one thing that (oddly, as it may sound) is the killer here, the part that constitutes the piece of poop in the Pringles can: Killing those people has a purpose. Yes, you heard me. I did say HAS a purpose. No, I did not forget to negate that. The very fact that killing those people has a purpose is the big letdown here for me.

    Allow me to elaborate how my antisocial, highly antagonistic and misanthropic mind works.

    The game rewards your killing sprees and mindless rampage with you regaining health from everyone you deliver from living to dead with the aid of highly accelerated metal spat from the tip of your gun. Why health you may ask. Well, the reason why you need health is the army of policemen, soldiers and whatever else one could think up to stop a ravaging madman from becoming the world record holder in the body-count category. And that's what pisses me off: I have to kill these people. It's not something I do because I wanna and because it's fun (remember, fun? Why we should play games?). Me going into that cafe and doing a pirouette on my toe-tips with the trigger firmly squeezed is not done so I get some cheap laugh out of people screaming and running for their lives and begging me not to find out how many bullets are needed to sever a limb of someone trying to avoid that. It's something I HAVE to do because outside the local police force made a picnic and found out that shooting stuff is fun and me giving them a good excuse to do it delights them so much that they have to spend their annual budget for bullets today and right now.

    And then it stops being fun. It starts being a requirement. A chore.

    And that takes away the fun of being a ravaging lunatic on a killing spree rampage. The whole point behind that being that you're god. You decide who gets to live and who gets to die. That's what makes mindless killing sprees fun. I liked your begging and groveling, mortal, you may live another day, begone now. But you over there, I didn't like your nose. Boom, headshot. See? Fun.

    That's not the case here. I cannot deliberately decide to NOT kill someone. That's the whole point of being "in control", of having "the power". Having a choice. You don't have that choice. And even if you had it, it doesn't matter. You simply don't get to care about the humans you kill. They lack any kind of personality, any kind of individuality, anything that makes them more than the million other "kill me for points" sprites that littered the screens of computer games since the times Space Invaders tried to kill your pixel tank. They're so interchangeable and bland. Nondescript. Can't we at least get a school class of kids so there would be at least a little bit of a hesitation? Well, not for me (being the antisocial bastard that I am, I'd go out of my way to kill them so they drop in an aesthetically pleasing way), but there are allegedly people who do care for kids enough to at least hesitate a moment before deciding that smaller targets just mean higher challenge.

    TL;DR: It's Diablo, just without the loot collection.
    Expand
  30. Jul 4, 2015
    0
    clarky you just proved how stupid and mediocre this game is for just writing a review to balance the score you have a brain that small just like this game developers this game is the definition of stupidity even if its was free this piece of garbage still not worth it
Metascore
43

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 48 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 48
  2. Negative: 27 out of 48
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Sep 1, 2015
    60
    Hatred is better internet scandal than game. [Aug 2015]
  2. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Aug 21, 2015
    69
    Hatred isn’t half as provocative as moralists claim: it doesn’t emphasize the act of aggression; it cares only about the number of victims. Executions are carried out with about as much emotion as stomping on a Goomba in Mario game. [Sept 2015, p.71]
  3. PC PowerPlay
    Aug 9, 2015
    30
    Not offensive enough to cause outcry, not good enough to warrant paying attention to. [Aug 2015, p.60]