Empires Apart

 PC
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 14
  3. Negative: 2 out of 14
  1. Meristation
    May 11, 2018
    70
    Empires Apart moves in the classic schemes of the RTS, but the novelties it presents are scarce 25 years after Dune II established the keys of the genre, to which it remains excessively faithful. It looses in the individual mode, weighed down by a deficient AI and the absence of campaign and it is shown to be funny and innovative in the multiplayer, to which clearly it is oriented.
  2. PC PowerPlay
    Apr 12, 2018
    70
    An almost too accurate reimagination of Age of Empires, in both the best and worst possible ways.
  3. SpazioGames
    Apr 1, 2018
    70
    Empires Apart is a solid old-school RTS with some innovations, with a focus on the multiplayer side.
  5. Everyeye.it
    Mar 30, 2018
    70
    The guys of DESTINYbit, however, have managed to do a good job in terms of characterization of the six present civilizations, each endowed with unique peculiarities that deeply modify the style of play, making the challenge against other human opponents very pleasant.
  6. Wccftech
    Apr 15, 2018
    67
    Empires Apart is a more than competent real-time strategy game featuring solid mechanics and unique features. Sadly, the almost complete lack of single player content damages the experience a bit, making the game recommended, at the current price point, only to those who are willing to play online against other human opponents.
  7. GameStar
    Apr 11, 2018
    67
    Solid clone of Age of Empires with technical mishaps, which barely offers single-player content, but varied factions and strategies in PvP.
  8. Gamersky
    Apr 19, 2018
    66
    Empires Apart has a beautiful art style, and its music is immersive. Unfortunately, stupid AI ruined the game, and the poor level design even made it worse.

Awards & Rankings

89
#89 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
5.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 9 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 9
  3. Negative: 4 out of 9
  1. monjedebeto
    Apr 1, 2018
    4
    First no campaign. The game is focus to the competitive, but you need a good computer to make a fluid game. Even other indie games can do itFirst no campaign. The game is focus to the competitive, but you need a good computer to make a fluid game. Even other indie games can do it better.
    The game haven't visual variety even don't have enough wild life to hunt, imitates AoE2 very well except the new version of AoE2 HD have better fauna and domestic animals.
    The game is very limited by content.
    7 maps
    4 size map options
    3 Pop capacity options
    4 game modes
    Six civilization with unique game play... not at all, only 3 of them are very different.
    The dominate strategy is use the Mongols. At last in AoE 1 you can choose more civilizations with this strategy.
    AI is terrible and spent whole game making useless buildings which it deleted randomly later on.
    I'm not sure if the low poly graphics are for an historical RTS.
    Poor historical features, the game centres in be an RTS "Fornite". Only for fun.
    They have a French faction that even speaks French.
    Imitates AoE 2 so well that you ask yourself if was necessary play this one.
    Good day/night feature... but sometimes is annoying.
    Many players asking for a better optimization.
    The next time they should be worried to make a good game(more than rip off) instead pay youtubers as sponsors. Next time be more obviously, because they show the game as a new truly successor of AoE.    … Full Review »
See all user reviews »