Duke Nukem Forever

 PC
User Score
5.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1276 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 488 out of 1276
  2. Mixed: 358 out of 1276
  3. Negative: 430 out of 1276
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. squint
    Jun 26, 2011
    10
    OK so this game needs some positive press, so here's my 2 cents. I've played the Single Player game thoroughly. I'm level 22 or so on Steam (multiplayer). I've had a lot of fun with this game. I mean, a lot. If there are people out there who are deciding not to try the game out because of the bad reviews, I would just suggest to them to try the game out themselves. At least the PC demo. IfOK so this game needs some positive press, so here's my 2 cents. I've played the Single Player game thoroughly. I'm level 22 or so on Steam (multiplayer). I've had a lot of fun with this game. I mean, a lot. If there are people out there who are deciding not to try the game out because of the bad reviews, I would just suggest to them to try the game out themselves. At least the PC demo. If you're using a console, forget about it. Duke is not meant to be played on console. Get a PC. :)… Expand
  2. nsane
    Jun 23, 2011
    7
    Sadly, this game is not as good as Duke Nukem 3D and fell a little flat on the expectations I had. The overall look and feel and gameplay mechanics suffer from the same ailments as most modern shooters (regenerating health, limited weapon slots, etc). Although exploration and open-endedness have never been traits of the Duke Nukem franchise, I would have loved to have seen less linearity.Sadly, this game is not as good as Duke Nukem 3D and fell a little flat on the expectations I had. The overall look and feel and gameplay mechanics suffer from the same ailments as most modern shooters (regenerating health, limited weapon slots, etc). Although exploration and open-endedness have never been traits of the Duke Nukem franchise, I would have loved to have seen less linearity. The previous flaws, however, do not a horrible game, make. Its flaws aside, this game was still fun. Duke Nukem is as charismatic and as full of himself as ever. The one-liners and pop references are funny and relevant, reminding you that you're playing a Duke Nukem game. Overall, unless you are a fan of the franchise, I can not recommend this title because on its own, this game falls flat. If you are a fan of Duke Nukem, however, I think you'll enjoy this game.… Expand
  3. AstraL
    Jun 24, 2011
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. [ QUOTE ] The game is simply fun. Not great, not bad, just fun. I'm personally dumbfounded by the terrible reviews it has been receiving as the game as a lot of variety, cool weapons, likable enemies and allies and Duke Nukem humor to top it off. If you don't take this game too seriously it can be a lot of fun. [ /QUOTE ]

    +1)    … Expand
  4. Antenna
    Jul 11, 2011
    10
    The positive reviews must have been written by employees of the program designers. Its the worst $44 ever spent on a game. The 1 min spent each time you re-spawn is awful, especially if your a bad player. and you die often. On the positive side and there are very few, its a good story and the graphics are fun.
    Do not waste money on this game, wait until its available in Wallmart for $4.95.
  5. RainbowDashie13
    Jul 31, 2012
    10
    Definitely a good **** shooter! Yeah, yeah, I know it took like 15 years to release it and the game could have been better, but **** Do you people have any idea what 3D Realms had to go through to release this **** game? I accept it as it is because it is still a good game, it's a refreshing shooter because it isn't too modern for me like most shooters being released nowadays.
    And 3D    Definitely a good **** shooter! Yeah, yeah, I know it took like 15 years to release it and the game could have been better, but **** Do you people have any idea what 3D Realms had to go through to release this **** game? I accept it as it is because it is still a good game, it's a refreshing shooter because it isn't too modern for me like most shooters being released nowadays.
    And 3D Realms are still releasing patches till this day to improve what they can, you can carry more guns, more graphics options, and increased performance and much more goodies.
    People, please don't be so **** close minded.    … Expand
  6. GamingPimpLIVE
    Oct 25, 2012
    10
    Amazing f**king game way more of an improvement than the ps3 and xbox
  7. LongtimeGamer
    Sep 11, 2011
    1
    Simple. Use the games case as a paper-weight. Not an enjoyable experience at all. Buggy. Clunky. Linear. Just lame excuse for a Duke Nukem Game.
  8. vAddicatedGamer
    Jul 3, 2011
    7
    Rule #53. You judge a game by its merits. You don't give bonus marks because it managed to survive, you don't give bonus marks because its main character reminded you of the good old days, and you don't give bonus marks merely because others think badly of it. Anyway, despite all the negative reviews, I went ahead and finished the game. It has a good shooter mechanics, interesting weapons,Rule #53. You judge a game by its merits. You don't give bonus marks because it managed to survive, you don't give bonus marks because its main character reminded you of the good old days, and you don't give bonus marks merely because others think badly of it. Anyway, despite all the negative reviews, I went ahead and finished the game. It has a good shooter mechanics, interesting weapons, interesting stages of game (mini-Duke, monster truck). I liked fighting/shooting/executing the aliens (boy do they have some new tricks up their sleeves) so yeah the core mechanics were pretty well done. The 2 disputable features: regenerating health and 2 guns at one time didn't bother me too much, although I admit I missed scrambling around looking for health packs when I'm seriously wounded in older FPS. There is also a healthy amount of cultural references (the first boss cracked me up a bit) and one-liners to keep players entertained. NPCs are hopelessly bland, their attempts at humor fall flat on the face (except for a few of them) but nevermind that, that has never been the Duke's concern. What led to the (admittedly exaggerated) animosity toward the game is probably the level design / pacing. While the alien-bashing was fun, too many a times the action is halted in favor of solving puzzles and navigating through obstacle courses. While they are fairly simplistic, they feel very contrived and they effectively stopped the game from gaining momentum. Plus the game is very restrictive in the sense that most of the time you end up in a confined space, fighting off several waves of enemies, and a previously locked door mysteriously unlocks and you go ahead to solve a puzzle. Rinse and repeat. Even if you are not in a confined space, running around doesn't reveal any interesting places (such as the secrets in Duke Nukem 3D) or anything interesting to do (if we disregard the minimalistic interaction with several in-game objects). My conclusion? I had fun. But sometimes the game feels unnecessarily tedious. It would have been a much better game if there were more alien-bashing and way way less puzzle-solving / platformer action.… Expand
  9. iNfinity
    Oct 3, 2011
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game is really good. Not awesome, but nearly there. Huge (and mildly disturbing) bosses were fun to fight, well, most of them anyway. One certain boss(ALIEN QUEEN) pissed me off. The Leeroy reference instantly deserved an 8.… Expand
  10. Sindo
    Oct 22, 2011
    3
    Overall very disappointing, some levels are good as is the level of interaction on them, but the good ones are scattered between lots and lots of other boring linear levels. The game play is old, clunky and uninspiring and check point saves..really? I couldn't wait for it to be over. Afterwards I looked at the screen shots/movies in the extra content menu, the game they were going toOverall very disappointing, some levels are good as is the level of interaction on them, but the good ones are scattered between lots and lots of other boring linear levels. The game play is old, clunky and uninspiring and check point saves..really? I couldn't wait for it to be over. Afterwards I looked at the screen shots/movies in the extra content menu, the game they were going to make looked awesome, its a shame they didn't stick to it. instead of just bolting loads of crap together a releasing it. They should have let Duke die rather than ripping his head off and **** in it ;)… Expand
  11. JimCorbett
    Mar 22, 2013
    2
    Such a terrible game. There are so many wrongs with this game, i can't list them all. Read the other negative reviews and you'll get why this game is bad. The only time i remotely enjoyed myself was using the shotgun to blast piggies in the face, and even that happens rarely. Stay away from this, please.
  12. iseeall
    Jul 29, 2013
    3
    A below-average shooter game. It does have some fun minigames inside (physics puzzles), and the designers strive hard to make the game as varied as possible. But everything together just doesn't seem to work. I also didn't like this sort of humor which seems to be the main thing about the Duke Nukem brand. There is nothing cool about it, it's rather annoying and makes me ask if americansA below-average shooter game. It does have some fun minigames inside (physics puzzles), and the designers strive hard to make the game as varied as possible. But everything together just doesn't seem to work. I also didn't like this sort of humor which seems to be the main thing about the Duke Nukem brand. There is nothing cool about it, it's rather annoying and makes me ask if americans really are that stupid to like this? I am sure they are not.… Expand
  13. Speed4Runs
    Dec 19, 2012
    3
    The game is not even comparable to Duke Nukem 3D. The game doesn't have action, or it has it in very little portions, because it's based on **** around.
  14. Fermentation
    Dec 30, 2012
    2
    This was the game that taught me never to pre-order a game again.

    The AI in this game is awful--you can watch a series of identical enemies jump in the scene from the exact same location, follow the same path, behaving the same way, jumping at the same point in the path, etc. Game development has progressed passed this point, and this game's mechanics feel very dated. The juvenile    This was the game that taught me never to pre-order a game again.

    The AI in this game is awful--you can watch a series of identical enemies jump in the scene from the exact same location, follow the same path, behaving the same way, jumping at the same point in the path, etc. Game development has progressed passed this point, and this game's mechanics feel very dated. The juvenile humor in this is no longer cute; it just seems pointless. I loved the original Duke MP, and I was hopeful that the multiplayer was going to be this version's saving grace. Nope. There is something that just off about it. The fact that everyone is Duke is also unfortunate.    … Expand
  15. mckw
    Sep 3, 2013
    1
    EVERYTHING is wrong with this game, the puzzles, the controversy, the game play, the jokes. If you're sadistic and want a rough ride in hell, play this horrible piece of horse dung. This game deserves nothing, an hour into this game is an hour lost. Poor dated graphics poor physics (and puzzles) and really crap aiming are just a few of the many existent problems with this game. AVOID at all cost.
  16. huntibor
    Mar 23, 2013
    8
    This game was great. A lot of interest in it for example to increase the ego, you can add a lot of things, like if you smoke, have sex, etc.. I do not understand why you are scolding the program. But I understand the artwork, but they could not have been better bring out a more than 10-year graphic engine (Unreal Engine 1).
  17. xxdiyxx2
    Jun 25, 2013
    1
    game-play looks worse than in the trailers 2001 2003 2006, graphics are so bad that I want to cry, the physics of the game is terrible. Level design in the game is terrible.
  18. fedecv
    Jul 1, 2013
    3
    Im a fan of duke nukem 3d, but dnf is really garbage it lost all essence, not recommended its boring and not cool in anyway, for me it was finished and released only to make some money
  19. Draculamarth
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Wait, this is the culmination of 15 years work? No wonder Duke Nukem is a dead franchise. The graphics are mediocre at best, and I'm not even a "grafix whore" and the gameplay is simultaneously too much like Duke 3D and not enough like Duke 3D. Let me try to explain: the gunplay comes ripped from 1996 and feels weak. There's no satisfaction in killing anyone, but the map design is straightWait, this is the culmination of 15 years work? No wonder Duke Nukem is a dead franchise. The graphics are mediocre at best, and I'm not even a "grafix whore" and the gameplay is simultaneously too much like Duke 3D and not enough like Duke 3D. Let me try to explain: the gunplay comes ripped from 1996 and feels weak. There's no satisfaction in killing anyone, but the map design is straight out of games like Medal of Honor. There's no cleverness to the way the maps work. They're boring. Wolfenstein 3D had more interesting maps and they didn't even have the benefit of a 3rd axis.

    Speaking of cleverness, the game simply isn't funny. While there was a certain charm in Duke Nukem 3D (It helps that that game wasn't awful), it wears off fast here. It's so self-indulgent, it almost made me vomit. Also, I'm all for "offensive humor", but the way this game treats women is sickening. It's like the Gearbox staff have never talked to real women (which wouldn't surprise me). I give it one point for not giving me an STD.    … Expand
  20. PeterSims
    Jan 2, 2014
    9
    I walked into this game having only played a few minutes of any previous alterations but I have got to say it was pretty fantastic. Duke himself is voiced by the great Jon St. John.

    If you like humor and FPS games this is a sure purchase because of how cheap it is now.
  21. BMF
    Jun 21, 2011
    10
    Duke is getting so much hate from critics but almost all of it is unfounded. Duke Nukem Forever might not be 15 years dev time good but its still a great game that many people are missing the point with. Alot of the fun in DNF comes from your hilarious interaction with the world and objects around you so if you just rush threw and dont try things out you will miss alot. All in all I wouldDuke is getting so much hate from critics but almost all of it is unfounded. Duke Nukem Forever might not be 15 years dev time good but its still a great game that many people are missing the point with. Alot of the fun in DNF comes from your hilarious interaction with the world and objects around you so if you just rush threw and dont try things out you will miss alot. All in all I would give duke a 8.5 a handfull of bugs and looking out of date in some places cant take away from the pure uncensored fun Duke provides. Im giving this a 10 to balance out the feminists and people who just didnt get it.… Expand
  22. NikTheGreatest
    Jun 21, 2011
    10
    Duke, The King, It's A Nomber One. After twelve years, it finally came to us! I waited for this since the Duke Nukem 3D. This game is some kind of nostalgia returner, you just playing it and feeling something wonderful that make you feel yourself like in goood-oooold times, that's right. Hail To The King, baby!
  23. RandomJack
    Jun 23, 2011
    10
    I love this game. Just like the original game Duke steps outside the box; world interaction, great game play, and classic quotes; its a game that can be played over and over and I still laugh. When you're ready for some fun gaming in your downtime this is it! Come get some.
  24. Hemiovoid
    Jun 16, 2011
    8
    This game would probably be a 6 or 7 ordinarily, but it gets extra points for its mere existence. It is all that it claims to be, i.e. Duke 3D without giant-cube-head-level graphics, but I couldn't help feeling while playing it that something was lacking. It's ridiculously interactive (particularly in the scatological and sexual areas, naturally) but feels overstuffed for it, and it feelsThis game would probably be a 6 or 7 ordinarily, but it gets extra points for its mere existence. It is all that it claims to be, i.e. Duke 3D without giant-cube-head-level graphics, but I couldn't help feeling while playing it that something was lacking. It's ridiculously interactive (particularly in the scatological and sexual areas, naturally) but feels overstuffed for it, and it feels like a way to distract from the functional but subpar gameplay. Overall, I'd say you should wait til it becomes rentable, and then, you know, do that.… Expand
  25. Grigor1997
    Jun 16, 2011
    10
    Duke Nukem Forever its a great shooter with great jokes. Authors are responsible came to his work. Although it has its flaws it fully justifies the 14 years of waiting.
  26. RoninTheOriginl
    Jun 15, 2011
    9
    Those expecting the second coming of Duke may be let down...sort of...it's complicated. This iteration, 15 years in the making (depending on how you're counting) continues with the same recipe that made the first so popular, with obviously improved graphics. Graphics - 8: I've heard complaints on the graphic quality, and sure, it's no Crysis 2, but why are there people still playingThose expecting the second coming of Duke may be let down...sort of...it's complicated. This iteration, 15 years in the making (depending on how you're counting) continues with the same recipe that made the first so popular, with obviously improved graphics. Graphics - 8: I've heard complaints on the graphic quality, and sure, it's no Crysis 2, but why are there people still playing Diablo 2 11 years later, a terrible (by comparison) looking game, with graphics that were nearly outdated before it came out? They get the job done, and 1-2 year old rigs like mine will take it all and smile. Sound - 7: This would score higher if it weren't for a glitch during the opening intro video. The sound was constantly cutting in and out. And that's a MAJOR buzz-kill when you've been waiting for this intro for 15 years. Might be sound or video drivers...might be because I'm still rocking XP. But in-game is great. Very satisfying explosions, gunfire, etc. Gameplay - 8: This too would have scored higher, but I'm afraid it's a little infected with a case of consolitis. There aren't action mini-games all over the place (at least yet), but there's no manual save that I can tell, only checkpoints. But that gripe aside, it's what a pure descendant of Duke should be. Those expecting Deus Ex or Mass Effect, go elsewhere. Multiplayer - ?: Uh...it has it, I know that. I'll get back to you on that. Conclusion - Those looking for depth and bleeding edge graphics, go elsewhere. Those wanting a classic Duke experience mixed with Team America, this is your game. The only other game in as long as I can remember that has elicited this many laughs was Portal 2. It's everything it should be. In other words, parents of children under a maturity age of 17 or 18, please leave this one on the shelf. (oh, and yea...I gave it a 9, because too many d-bags (to use one of the Duke's phrases) really were expecting the second coming)… Expand
  27. WiZKiD
    Jun 16, 2011
    8
    Glad to see Duke's back! Game play is the only issue I have, and it really is due to the limitations on where you can go/move/do in the environment. It is just too scripted, but otherwise is very enjoyable. Who would have thought playing with poo can be a character boost? Thank you 3D Realms!!
  28. blablue123
    Jun 16, 2011
    9
    I've played through the game and let me tell you - this game is GREAT!! It is a very fun, straightforward FPS (without any BS like other modern games) with some puzzle, driving and platforming levels. Some weapons are brought back back from Duke 3D but there quite a few new ones, which are awesome. The humor is usually funny. Duke's one liners made me laugh out loud. (Although some ofI've played through the game and let me tell you - this game is GREAT!! It is a very fun, straightforward FPS (without any BS like other modern games) with some puzzle, driving and platforming levels. Some weapons are brought back back from Duke 3D but there quite a few new ones, which are awesome. The humor is usually funny. Duke's one liners made me laugh out loud. (Although some of them were a bit cheesy). Graphics look a bit outdated but they don't take away from the fun factor. Overall, I think this is one of the better FPS this decade.… Expand
  29. Midnight
    Jun 16, 2011
    8
    Pros: It's Duke, baby. Misogynistic, foul mouthed, and filled with the humor and over the top action in Duke Nukem 3D.

    Cons: Reloading, limited sprint, and regenerating health. Most people seem to have some very odd assumption going into this game that it's going to be the gaming equivalent to the Second Coming, where there will somehow have no flaws, and will dispense chocolate ice    Pros: It's Duke, baby. Misogynistic, foul mouthed, and filled with the humor and over the top action in Duke Nukem 3D.

    Cons: Reloading, limited sprint, and regenerating health.

    Most people seem to have some very odd assumption going into this game that it's going to be the gaming equivalent to the Second Coming, where there will somehow have no flaws, and will dispense chocolate ice cream on demand. When this doesn't happen, they immediately think it's the worst thing to ever grace the computer. Is it the best game? No. Is it the worst game? No!    … Expand
  30. stefansts
    Jun 17, 2011
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Thx Gearbox for this lovely game , i don´t like this COD and BF crap .
    Such fun for an amount of hours ..... Duke one : Gear zero So let them say anything like ..oh rubbish... and kick ass .
    Finally again thanks for the whole effort in every way ... and wait for DLC´s ....please !!    … Expand
  31. gryxitl
    Jun 18, 2011
    10
    I mean I hear the game is fun in both gameplay and concept, thats probably why everyone hated it. The world is colorful, and there is plenty of humor. One of the ideas that I haven't seen anyone talking about are the teleporting enemies. I mean it's a nice spin on the standard AI that involves shoot, hide behind cover, shoot.
  32. kericr
    Jun 18, 2011
    7
    After three gaming engines, two development studios, and 14 years of waiting, Duke Nukem Forever is finally here. And while the game has quite a few warts, it's not without it's own distinct charm and is certainly worth a look if you're a fan of Duke.

    I'd like to get the most obvious thing out of the way, something professional reviewers seem to be harping on: Duke Nukem is a pompous,    After three gaming engines, two development studios, and 14 years of waiting, Duke Nukem Forever is finally here. And while the game has quite a few warts, it's not without it's own distinct charm and is certainly worth a look if you're a fan of Duke.

    I'd like to get the most obvious thing out of the way, something professional reviewers seem to be harping on: Duke Nukem is a pompous, cruel, despicable self-centered **** of a character. He's been that way since Duke Nukem 3D and that hasn't changed; and in the spirit of Duke, if you don't like that, tough **** The likeability of the character should have virtually no bearing in a game review, and it won't in this one.

    The strongest game-play aspect of the game is it's single-player campaign. The controls are straightforward, the mechanics of the aim-and-shoot game-play are as expected, strong. Everything works as it should and interfacing with it is a quality experience not unlike other modern games. The platforming works well. There are some balance issues throughout the campaign, and the two gun restriction presented in DNF seems like a pretty unnecessary change considering the style of gameplay that's employed. The game will hurdle multiple waves of 2-3 enemies at you and require you to conserve your ammunition with no weapons in sight, and this happens multiple times throughout. It's a strategic game mechanic used in areas where no strategy is required. Ultimately, it ends up being a pain in the ass. The AI is strong enough to put up a decent fight; strafing straight-forward attacks, leading shots, intelligently using explosives, and has particularly clever pathfinding mechanics which make it difficult to relax when engaging multiple hostiles. The AI recognizes choke points and will often avoid them if possible. It would be nice if the maps had more complexity during engagements because I feel that the AI's not being used to it's full potential; but due to the weapons limitations, it may not necessarily be a bad thing.

    The weapon arsenal available to Duke is a mixed bag. The shotgun is the star of the show here, useful on virtually every hostile you engage that you can get close to, except for bosses. The pistol is a useable last resort weapon, and the ripper does a pretty good job as a medium-to-far range tool. The RPG also packs quite a punch. The Devastator, on the other hand, is underpowered and doesn't hold it's own in boss battles, where it's necessary to have an explosive weapon to deal damage. The Shrink Ray doesn't seem to fit in the game at all, and the Freeze Ray is woefully ineffective despite having infinite ammo.

    The story is standard Duke faire: aliens invade Earth and Duke needs to save the world. It's a throwaway story that Duke's persona does nothing to energize it. The one biggest disappointment I have with the setting is that Duke's 1-liners are largely not funny. There's not a lot of creativity in the application of played-out movie quotes and a surprisingly high amount of recycled content from Duke Nukem 3D.

    The multiplayer aspects however leave quite a bit to be desired. While there are plenty of maps, the gameplay modes (Deathmatch/TeamDM, CTF, King of the Hill) are played out, uninspired tripe. While these game modes might have been acceptable in 1998, it isn't now. Multiplayer Duke is worth maybe five to ten hours of entertainment before you'll get bored with it.

    The game's graphics aren't particularly strong. Much of the color pallete is either muted or washed out and while the character models have a fair amount of detail, some of the textures look like they haven't been cleaned up since they last converted engines. It's not disgusting or horrible, but the graphics don't do anything to benefit the game-play experience.

    For that matter, neither does the sound. The music for the most part, are generic, unmemorable guitar riffs, the environmental and enemy sound effects are uninspired, and the weapon sound effects range from forgettable to, in the case of the shotgun, downright awful. Duke's one-liners almost universally sound flat and indifferent.

    The PC version of this game has a handful of technical glitches, with the most annoying one being that when crossing checkpoints, the game will automatically re-spawn you at the checkpoint location, which is disorienting. I also noticed several times where I would shoot an enemy with the railgun only to have them delay their death animation for several seconds. The load time issues that cripple the console versions of this game are nowhere to be found on the PC.

    Overall, the game has the feel of quite a bit of effort poured into it, but at the same time hindered by it's extremely long development cycle and, coincidentally rush to production once Gearbox got the rights to finish it. This isn't a great game, but it makes me optimistic that Duke Nukem 4 can be with a more stable production schedule.    … Expand
  33. wakawakawaka1
    Dec 20, 2011
    1
    level design is boring and generic,outdated graphics,game felt like it should have beeen realeased at least 5 or 6 years ago.generic multiplayer and only redeeming factos it is nasty humour!
  34. Mittsies
    Jun 17, 2011
    3
    Whereas Duke Nukem 3D through us right in the action of it all, the latest installment is slow and miserable by comparison. Obviously Gear Box knew people would have a lot of patience, considering they waited over a decade for this title, so as a result they have brought you hours upon hours of pointless content including (But not limited to) walking, standing, spamming space-bar, orWhereas Duke Nukem 3D through us right in the action of it all, the latest installment is slow and miserable by comparison. Obviously Gear Box knew people would have a lot of patience, considering they waited over a decade for this title, so as a result they have brought you hours upon hours of pointless content including (But not limited to) walking, standing, spamming space-bar, or listening to horrible voice actors spout ****

    The combat and the one liners (as rare as they may be) are perfect, essentially. Shoot bad guy, bad guy dies, you've got balls of steel. The regenerating health and 2-weapon limit are annoying -- but not enough to sour my day. What truly makes this game unbearable and horrible is how slow-paced it is. The game even includes a lot of very-fitting elevator music as you walk around, doing basically nothing. You'll often think "what am I doing? What's the point of this?" as you solve pointless puzzles that often involve pushing things, jumping on things, and finding things. It's BORING. Duke Nukem is a badass who solves his problems with guns and alcohol -- not logic.

    In the end, even if you cream your pants over Duke's 1-liners, the game is not even remotely playable. If they only removed all the "filler" content and narrow the gameplay down to the 2 essential elements that made Duke Nukem 3D a great game, Duke Nukem Forever could have stood a chance. Those three things are: Killing Aliens and Badass One-Liners.    … Expand
  35. stoneysilence
    Feb 1, 2012
    1
    I got it for free, and I think I paid too much for it. The animation is terrible, the levels are tiny, mobs shoot through solid objects. It's almost as if they sat down and thought how can we make the worst game ever? And then they created it.
  36. risko404
    Jun 17, 2011
    8
    If anybody is looking at the average Metacritic score of DNF... don't believe it! The critics are morons who act like this game should have been a masterpiece, which it isn't but it's far from bad. This game is very enjoyable. Not only is the game play amazing and the weaponry pretty sweet, but over all, it's just a really fun game to play. Everybody thinks that it's graphics are toIf anybody is looking at the average Metacritic score of DNF... don't believe it! The critics are morons who act like this game should have been a masterpiece, which it isn't but it's far from bad. This game is very enjoyable. Not only is the game play amazing and the weaponry pretty sweet, but over all, it's just a really fun game to play. Everybody thinks that it's graphics are to outdated and the story sucks. Well yeah the graphics are a bit out dated, but what do you expect. The game has been in development for 14 years! Once 3D Realms went under, Gearbox was kind enough to finish it up. Once the public found out about this, everybody started pressuring them more and more to release it. Yes, the development towards the end was rushed which caused the game to be lacking in some areas, but the game is still very fun and I enjoyed playing it. I've heard many things from people, like the graphics are dated, the game play sucks, the humor is childish and offensive... well guess what, it's a Duke Nukem game, of course it's gonna be offensive, if you don't like it, don't play the game! And no, the game play doesn't suck, unless the only games you've ever played in your life are call of duty modern warfare or halo, then yes, you may not be used to a game that is actually good. I just can't believe the reviews critics are giving this game. When the game first came out in North America, the average metacritic score was 62! Now its 58! There are so many games that are far worse than DNF, yet they always seem to get pretty good scores and this game just gets crapped on. The only game critic I think that gave DNF a good, honest score was PC Gamer, because they give their honest opinion on games, instead of just saying a game sucks because it doesn't meet all their stupid expectations. And if you're playing DNF on an Xbox 360 and giving it a bad review, then you're a stupid moron. Playing ports of games that were meant for the PC in the first place is a bad idea, especially with DNF. Development for this game began back in 1997, when the only console out at the time that didn't suck was the Playstation 1. So when some dumb 15 year-old says he doesn't like the game, well that's because he was still crapping his diapers when Duke 3D came out, and had no idea what games were really like back then. In a nutshell, Duke Nukem Forever is well worth the money, and is a solid fps game. No, it is not worth waiting 14 years for, but really... what game is? Thank you for reading my rant and I hope you realize that you should never say a game sucks because some stuck up critic douchebag says it does.… Expand
  37. FunniestGameEvR
    Jun 19, 2011
    10
    It appears a Special Interest group, "Women's Media Center" took offense to Duke Nukem and falsified reports in a viral attack at the games release. Proof Below*. Duke Nukem Forever takes everything that is wrong with the world and brilliantly slaps it in the face with humor. The game is non-stop hilarity, and the only people who don't like the game are obviously offended by the jokes.It appears a Special Interest group, "Women's Media Center" took offense to Duke Nukem and falsified reports in a viral attack at the games release. Proof Below*. Duke Nukem Forever takes everything that is wrong with the world and brilliantly slaps it in the face with humor. The game is non-stop hilarity, and the only people who don't like the game are obviously offended by the jokes. Maybe the offended never studied parody, but Duke Nukem Forever is a shining example of the ancient art form. I can't wait for a sequel or more games that lighten up a little like Duke Nukem and Shadow Warrior. If you are offended by Duke Nukem, maybe it is because the joke is on you and the ridiculous facades you defend, such as the proof given. *Proof: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/03/25/duke-nukem-dustup-games-capture-babe-mode-players-slapping-women/
    Those lies from the Womens Center aside, the game is beautiful, the boss battles are so EPIC they beat out Zelda games, the action is well paced, and every corner nook and cranny is crammed with video game parody or just outright making fun of other video games. And if the Women's Center thinks men become derogatory to women because of a funny video game, maybe they should have helped Jack Thompson in his crusade that said everyone who plays a video game will become a mass murderer, or helped the movement against movies or music decades ago that have been proved false.    … Expand
  38. Joe_Friday
    Jun 25, 2011
    0
    An awful game. It's so bad, I gave up half-way through and deleted it. I loved playing the original Duke Nukem games in the 80's and 90's, but this new version disappoints. They keep saying this game took 12 years to release, and it shows. The graphics are dated and the game play is clunky and awkward. I wish I could get my money back!
  39. YURoppinion
    Jun 27, 2011
    10
    Everyone has a different opinion . I think you should get a free demo and then if you like it buy the game. SIMPLE!!!! I dont even have the game! i just thought the reviews looked terible.
  40. Axelskull
    Jun 14, 2011
    0
    my real score would be a 3 or a 4 but with all these untruthful 10s being thrown around im forced to give it a 0 to balance it up.

    the graphics are horribly outdated for a game that's released in 2011. The engine needs to be put down. The graphics are horrible, the game play is repetitive, and generic. I was expecting to be disappointed, but not by to this extent. true duke fans should    my real score would be a 3 or a 4 but with all these untruthful 10s being thrown around im forced to give it a 0 to balance it up.

    the graphics are horribly outdated for a game that's released in 2011. The engine needs to be put down. The graphics are horrible, the game play is repetitive, and generic.

    I was expecting to be disappointed, but not by to this extent.

    true duke fans should pretend this garbage never came out, and to hold a hope that the future may one day yield a good duke game we've all waited for.    … Expand
  41. TJarnold92
    Jun 16, 2011
    8
    Don't expect this to be Call of Duty. It's fun in it's own right, absolutely hilarious. The shooting is o.k., I fond myself using the shotgun solely because it was the only thing with great stopping power, and it's a little hard to aim.
    However, there is immense variety in what you can do in the game, countless ways to detour from your actual objective, whether it be playing pinball,    Don't expect this to be Call of Duty. It's fun in it's own right, absolutely hilarious. The shooting is o.k., I fond myself using the shotgun solely because it was the only thing with great stopping power, and it's a little hard to aim.
    However, there is immense variety in what you can do in the game, countless ways to detour from your actual objective, whether it be playing pinball, blackjack, etc..
    I believe this is the only way they could have truly done a sequel in the modern era.    … Expand
  42. alien5
    Jun 17, 2011
    10
    Totally undeserving of such low scores, especially with so many uninventive and tedious sequels getting 9's or higher. Honestly, more varied and fun, though perhaps not as polished as most AAA shooters of this generation.
  43. DrLightman
    Jun 18, 2011
    10
    Old fashion gameplay, but seems original compared to actual standards.

    Old school players who have partially forgotten (can they?) how games looked like, will appreciate a dive in the past. Graphics is more than acceptable, the game looks good and very fluid on my HD5870. Action changes from frenetic to exploration, whenever necessary. Duke irony is there and makes the game funny    Old fashion gameplay, but seems original compared to actual standards.

    Old school players who have partially forgotten (can they?) how games looked like, will appreciate a dive in the past.

    Graphics is more than acceptable, the game looks good and very fluid on my HD5870.

    Action changes from frenetic to exploration, whenever necessary.

    Duke irony is there and makes the game funny also.

    Real vote should be around 7 but I have to give 10 to balance the trolls who put 2.    … Expand
  44. inidu
    Jun 14, 2011
    0
    This game plucks features from other, better games, but the features never really cohere into a whole. The entire project seems unfocused and nonsensical. Combat with the strictly reduced arsenal is punishing for all the wrong reasons -- it is annoying to backtrack for that one useful gun. The humor is not action-movie parody, it's just bathroom humor. And even that's giving it too muchThis game plucks features from other, better games, but the features never really cohere into a whole. The entire project seems unfocused and nonsensical. Combat with the strictly reduced arsenal is punishing for all the wrong reasons -- it is annoying to backtrack for that one useful gun. The humor is not action-movie parody, it's just bathroom humor. And even that's giving it too much credit. The graphics are ugly, lumpy, and desaturated, and the gameplay is among the worst I've ever experienced. I tried hard to like this game, but it just wasn't any fun, didn't make me laugh, and was remarkably poorly executed.… Expand
  45. StavrosDim
    Jun 14, 2011
    4
    Gameplay
    Gameplay is far away from 'classic' as we know it from Duke Nukem 3d,but it isn't like a modern game's either.
    Duke's health (ego) auto regenerates,but that doesn't make the game easier at all. The game uses a "trial and error" unforgiving system,and you are going to loose lots of lives because you didn't guessed correctly what will happen next. The game demands from you to do    Gameplay
    Gameplay is far away from 'classic' as we know it from Duke Nukem 3d,but it isn't like a modern game's either.
    Duke's health (ego) auto regenerates,but that doesn't make the game easier at all.
    The game uses a "trial and error" unforgiving system,and you are going to loose lots of lives because you didn't guessed correctly what will happen next.
    The game demands from you to do what you must do very accurately,and what exactly you have to do is something you will discover yourself after dying numerous times and trying anything your mind can imagine.
    Some aliens can kill you with a single hit,or two in most cases,and when the game throws 4 to 5 of them on you suddenly and they come from places you've already been before and you didn't so anybody,or it might just spawn them right next to you,having you flanked and surrounded,and then dying.
    The game will be throwing hordes of monsters again and again,and there will be times the next wave of aliens will come before your ego replenishes from the last fight.
    There will be times you will die by a single hit,from an enemy not even visible on the screen.
    There is a 1 weapon limit,and it's bad not only because it doesn't fit Duke's character,but also because it doesn't fit the rest of the gameplay.
    There will be times like this:
    * You have two weapons with ya,the ones ideal for the situation on the level you are in to.
    *Suddenly and unexpectedly your screen goes black and you go to next level.
    *You find a room full of enemies that you weren't prepared to fight,because you doesn't have the ideal weapons for them.
    *You search around to find an ideal weapon,and there are no weapons at all before that room.
    *You exit the game,and re-load the level you completed some moments ago so you will exit it with the right guns this time.
    Playing DNF's campaign is going to get you frustrated and furious,and if you ever broke gamepads or keyboards while playing a game,I assure you that DNF isn't for you.
    The game's interactivity doesn't excite.
    There is less interactivity in DNF than in DN3D that came 14 years ago,and somebody would expect that a game 14 years later would have at least the same amount of interactivity if not more.
    But it's not like that.
    In DN3D you would shoot the toilets,and water would come out from the pipes,but not on DNF.
    In DN3D you would shoot the pipes and natural gas would come out,but not on DNF.
    In DN3D you would shoot a cash machine and money would pop out,but not in DNF.
    The list could go on,but I guess you got my point.
    Level design is linear on all levels,and there is only one route to go.
    You won't get lost as you did on DN3D's complex levels.
    In DNF there aren't secret rooms or entire secret levels either,and that limits replay value and vanishes the exploration feeling and factor that was dominant on DN3D.
    If you try to explore around,the game will punish you with invisible walls.
    There are many invisible walls and the developers could just remove them and let us go on some places,or place physical hurdles,to make it at least reasonable.
    There are too many QTE's and you will have to mash the buttons on your keyboard or controller as fast as you can,but they appear with such a frequency they get annoying IMHO.
    There isn't variety on the game's puzzles.
    You will have to redo the same the same type of puzzles again and again at different levels,and the most common is the barrel type.This puzzle requires you to look around to find all the barrels and then place them to the right spot.
    That's it. Repeat on next level.And on the one after.And again later.
    Duke Nukem Forever is a game that won't keep you interested enough to finish it because of its story or its gameplay,but because of stubborness.
    You have to be very patient and stubborn to keep playing it to the finish and tolerate its bad story,bad graphics,and its punitive gameplay.
    Most likely it's a game won't play again after you finish it once,if you ever finish it.


    Last Words
    Duke Nukem Forever was one of my most anticipated games for years.
    There have been many promises,even more speculation and even more wait,that lead to very high expectations and too much hype.
    When the game finally released,it wasn't "The best game of all time" as 3D Realms once promised,but instead it didn't even catch up with its predecessor,and DNF fell much lower.
    Lots of wrong design decisions,abstract and uncompleted ideas,and bad execution make this game not good enough to stand along the rest of the series. It made me believe that it would be better if it would never come out,so we could all stay with memories of a game that would be the best game of all time,even if we could never play it.    … Expand
  46. m4ch1
    Jun 15, 2011
    4
    this game have humor and.......i cant of think anything else. This game is TOP 1 candidate on biggest disapointment of 2011. DONT BUY THIS, ITS WASTE OF MONEY better get drunk or buy your girlfriend something nice...
  47. Imlies
    Jun 20, 2011
    10
    great! Great!!! Great!!great! Great!!! Great!!great! Great!!! Great!!great! Great!!! Great!!great! Great!!! Great!!great! Great!!! Great!!great! Great!!! Great!!great! Great!!! Great!!great! Great!!! Great!!
  48. WangSulah
    Jun 18, 2011
    10
    Forget the negative reviews, they have no idea what they're going on about. This game delivers exactly what it is supposed to: an absurdly masculine, drug-addled sex fiend on a mission to get all the chicks back from the Alien Bastards (tm). A solid shooter with hilarious one-liners and homages to Internet pop culture -- oh, and **** After the "12 f$@!ing years," Duke Nukem still rules.
  49. Darken
    Jun 21, 2011
    8
    This game is old school, what you have here is doom style shooting mixed with platforming, puzzle solving, huge bosses and levels with the get from A to B feel. While not ground breaking (It was never gonna be, a game in development for over 10 years ffs. Your lucky it ever made the light of day.) but the graphics are decent. It's like a well polished Bioshock graphically. For any peopleThis game is old school, what you have here is doom style shooting mixed with platforming, puzzle solving, huge bosses and levels with the get from A to B feel. While not ground breaking (It was never gonna be, a game in development for over 10 years ffs. Your lucky it ever made the light of day.) but the graphics are decent. It's like a well polished Bioshock graphically. For any people who loved the original and want more of the same i absolutely recommend Duke Nukem Forever. If you want the latest DX11 graphics and CoD black ops gameplay then forget it and go back to black ops online. This game is oldschool and thats what it was meant to be. 8/10… Expand
  50. cutco310
    Jun 18, 2011
    10
    ive hear alot of negative reviews on this game and i hesitated on buying it. but after reading PC gamers review i decided to pull the trigger on the purchase. a big issue i heard about were its gfx. and after booting it up i was surprised that the gfx were not bad at all. in fact they were great. only time i noticed poor graphics was when i passed in front of a mirror the reflection ofive hear alot of negative reviews on this game and i hesitated on buying it. but after reading PC gamers review i decided to pull the trigger on the purchase. a big issue i heard about were its gfx. and after booting it up i was surprised that the gfx were not bad at all. in fact they were great. only time i noticed poor graphics was when i passed in front of a mirror the reflection of duke was a bit jaggy. but who cares? i enjoyed the physics in the game also. level design i was okay with, character models all looked great, and the humor was more than enjoyable, if anything i just wished there was a little more of it. people slam the game for not being groundbreaking and setting new trends, but what it comes down to is that this is a duke game. and i think it was a great effort. it sure felt like a duke nukem to me. and thats what were really buying here isnt it? a Duke experience? im glad the game finally hit shelves at all to be honest. could it have been better? sure, but it defiantly could have been worse. and i hear the game is selling well despite the reviews, so hopefully this will fuel a swift sequel that will address some of the issues people are having problems with. If you want a fun game and are not expecting it to "change the way we play fps's" then this is a safe buy, especially if your an old school duke fan. and its a bit linear, but no more or less than Dn3d… Expand
  51. Baeocystin
    Jun 18, 2011
    10
    I'm not sure what people were expecting. DNF may not be GOTY, but it's a fun, funny game. In today's FPS environment of Gear of Honor Duty, it's kind of nice to, you know... Laugh once in a while? Get the PC version to avoid load-time issues, and have a blast with Duke.
  52. Kauzio
    Jun 20, 2011
    10
    My real score for this game is 8/10. I'm putting it down as 10 as there are an insane number of 0, or 1, or excessively negative reviews for this game, and it's totally messing up the score.

    The PC version of this game does not have texture problems, the graphics are not "from 2003". They look a couple of years out of date but are tidy and professional. The game has a slow start, with    My real score for this game is 8/10. I'm putting it down as 10 as there are an insane number of 0, or 1, or excessively negative reviews for this game, and it's totally messing up the score.

    The PC version of this game does not have texture problems, the graphics are not "from 2003". They look a couple of years out of date but are tidy and professional. The game has a slow start, with perhaps the weaker level design at the beginning, but the rest of the game has much more interesting design and fun levels. The game is more linear and easy than it's predecessor, which in my view is good. Hunting for key-cards and med-kits makes the game much slower, so the better pacing improved the game-play. The two-weapon limit was disappointing.

    The game is decent, fun, no more offensive than it's predecessor, and is simply part of a wider media crucifixion. Any review which gives the PC version of this game less than 5/10 is simply not being objective and should be dismissed.    … Expand
  53. MadclownJack
    Jul 7, 2011
    9
    For all of the 12 year olds out there, you really need to educate yourselves on the subject of games if you think this is crap. You were a glint in the postman's eye back then so shut the **** up.

    Seriously though, i get the flame war that was 13 years in the making, but the game is far from crap. It is a genuine Duke experience. Profanity, sexual innuendo, aliens and babes. I mean, the    For all of the 12 year olds out there, you really need to educate yourselves on the subject of games if you think this is crap. You were a glint in the postman's eye back then so shut the **** up.

    Seriously though, i get the flame war that was 13 years in the making, but the game is far from crap. It is a genuine Duke experience. Profanity, sexual innuendo, aliens and babes. I mean, the game is THE most waited for title in history and quite frankly, it made the cut. It's a lot of fun, which Duke was all about since the first 3d title. Linear? Have you even played the Duke Nukem 3d? That's what **** was, back in the day. The game doesn't fool itself that it's nothing more than a thrill ride on steroids. Neither did anyone expect anything more from it. It has variety, which i definitely did not expect. It has a nice level design, good looking enemies and a fun gameplay. And this is all coming from a guy that's not a big fan of the series. If you're looking for mindless fun and digital boobies, sprinkled with comedy and a bunch of aliens, take a shot at it. Literaly.    … Expand
  54. spidersfrommars
    May 16, 2012
    0
    Ugg mistakenly gave this thing a 10 out 10.. re-submitted.

    This pos is so bad and is mostly just boring. I suppose this is the reason why G Broussard didn't get it out the door, even changing engines couldn't help this train wreck. All the negative reviews are true, avoid.
  55. SJ555
    Jun 4, 2012
    2
    AN SERIOUS EPIC FAIL GAMEPLAY ..... ODD VISUALS..WEAK DRIVING MECHANICS AND SHOOTING AND EPIC!!.."FAILED" PLOT .. Sorry to say but ... "King just fail to impress baby"
  56. Brendan501
    Dec 4, 2012
    10
    dis gfame was lkie awesome in lkie eveary way d00d but i didnt like thae sotry parts because i think story es stupid d00d but c0d is better in like every way d00d
  57. tarekmallo
    Sep 16, 2011
    4
    We waited for and dreamed about this game for 15 years and all we got is a bunch of carp. Dated graphics, terrible voice-acting and a bad unfunny script. Thank a bunch gearbox!
  58. vorpalsponge
    Jul 6, 2011
    3
    The only redeeming quality of this game is the fact that it stars Duke Nukem. The game, stripped of previous expectations, can be considered an FPS with an identity crisis. What seems like a struggle for variety falls short and becomes a disjointed, inconsistent experience. There are a few enjoyable moments, but many more frustrating ones regarding the highly erratic difficulty spikes,The only redeeming quality of this game is the fact that it stars Duke Nukem. The game, stripped of previous expectations, can be considered an FPS with an identity crisis. What seems like a struggle for variety falls short and becomes a disjointed, inconsistent experience. There are a few enjoyable moments, but many more frustrating ones regarding the highly erratic difficulty spikes, unimaginative gameplay, and drab environments.

    This game will most likely only be played so that one can say they played a "Duke Nukem" game. You can easily just pass on this game, and you will not miss out on anything.    … Expand
  59. FoeHammer391
    Oct 12, 2011
    5
    As much as i'd love to welcome back Duke with warm arms; DNF leaves me predictably dissappointed. Muddy graphics, brain-less shooting, and what can only be quoted as a 'story' all leave us a dress shoe put together by a Cambodian sweat-shop. As much as I like John St. John's one-liners and some small elements of interactivity, this is the first videogame I can make a historical comparisonAs much as i'd love to welcome back Duke with warm arms; DNF leaves me predictably dissappointed. Muddy graphics, brain-less shooting, and what can only be quoted as a 'story' all leave us a dress shoe put together by a Cambodian sweat-shop. As much as I like John St. John's one-liners and some small elements of interactivity, this is the first videogame I can make a historical comparison to "Chinese Democracy".… Expand
  60. davenbettridge
    Jul 7, 2011
    4
    Its should be no surprise to anyone why bad/mediocre games exist- not every video game company knows, understands or has the facilities to make their games good, but what is surprising is that people actually like, are entertained by, and sometimes prefer crappy mediocre video games. Whatever happened (or failed to happen) at 3D Realms during the development of Duke Nukem is an amazingIts should be no surprise to anyone why bad/mediocre games exist- not every video game company knows, understands or has the facilities to make their games good, but what is surprising is that people actually like, are entertained by, and sometimes prefer crappy mediocre video games. Whatever happened (or failed to happen) at 3D Realms during the development of Duke Nukem is an amazing lessons for us all, especially the video game industry. It teaches us above anything else how challenging and difficult making a good games is, that its much much easier to fail while making a game rather then succeed and that we should cherish every game that does work well. In the end DNF is mediocre at best. Its dated, lacks much charm, the graphics are bland to crapish, the female human models are atrocious, the humour at first is kinda ok then drifts to lame and the gameplay grow tired fairly quickly. DNF does exist, it is playable, but that doesnâ… Expand
  61. randylin26
    Oct 17, 2012
    1
    I can't understand why Duke Nukem Forever received a score this high. The game is aweful is just playing like its full of **** in it. I DONT UNDERSTAND DARN YOU DUKE
  62. DRiVER_helsinki
    Dec 28, 2013
    10
    Im one guy more to say :
    Good multiplayer fun,
    responsive and good feeling of controls. Many underrated ideas would have modern today gamecompany huge balls to have in the released game duke has to have balls! For what happened in development process, and we are happy to have tis at all gotta forgive the graphics, but i say i see many nice inventions in models. Does actually feel    Im one guy more to say :
    Good multiplayer fun,
    responsive and good feeling of controls.
    Many underrated ideas would have modern today gamecompany huge balls to have in the released game duke has to have balls!
    For what happened in development process, and we are happy to have tis at all gotta forgive the graphics, but i say i see many nice inventions in models.
    Does actually feel like a Duke Nukem game,
    and the sounds and voice acting is Duke enough said    … Expand
  63. Gustavph
    Mar 23, 2017
    0
    parabens uma bosta!...................................................................................................................................................................................e ponto final.
  64. BosseKop
    Jul 9, 2017
    8
    The game was overhyped but it is not a bad game it is actually really fun and enjoyable. Maybe the jokes are not so funny but the weapons are nice and the maps are fun to play. The multiplayer is also pretty enjoyable
  65. pizzatracker
    Jun 14, 2011
    1
    This is the biggest joke of a game ever in a bad way; easily the most disappointing game ever and one of the worst. Graphics aren't good on the pc( its so outdated), and I dont want to see how terrible the console version is it. Poor textures and bad effects like shadows and explosions and wierd movements. Level design is very bad and only takes a couple of minutes to beat them followed byThis is the biggest joke of a game ever in a bad way; easily the most disappointing game ever and one of the worst. Graphics aren't good on the pc( its so outdated), and I dont want to see how terrible the console version is it. Poor textures and bad effects like shadows and explosions and wierd movements. Level design is very bad and only takes a couple of minutes to beat them followed by long loading times, why is it that you can only hold 2 weapons when there are many guns to pick up (example of trying to be modern but fails), and the melee should be the kicking attack instead of the gun butt. It tries to be funny but fails to put out one good joke. One thing that really annoys me is how it tries to be old school and modern at the same time instead of being itself and putting in new ideas. The most disappointing part is that they could of release it way before and possibly set the standards back than, it may of even change the fps genre back than and everything may be different today if they released it back than; Seriously, what have they been doing for the past 14 years, I can make a better game than 3d realms and release it on time, that's how bad duke nukem forever is. I will at least give it a 1 only because they proved me wrong that it will actually be released, but now I believe it would of been the right thing to just cancel it so that duke nukem franchise doesn't get ruined and rest. 14 years down the drain… Expand
  66. Evis03
    Jun 14, 2011
    3
    The graphics are dire. Seriously dire. Modern ideas as to what constitutes good graphics have polluted the game (there is no colour that is not a shade of brown or black), and half of the game is played in the dark, meaning you need to use the crappy night vision which somehow makes the game look even worse, as well as giving you a headache. The draw distance and distance blur is extremelyThe graphics are dire. Seriously dire. Modern ideas as to what constitutes good graphics have polluted the game (there is no colour that is not a shade of brown or black), and half of the game is played in the dark, meaning you need to use the crappy night vision which somehow makes the game look even worse, as well as giving you a headache. The draw distance and distance blur is extremely short, so much so that it is often shorter than the range of some fire fights. Even on Ultra, this game looks like Doom III.

    Gameplay is a horrible mishmash of ideas from the past and the present, and few of them play off well against each other. For some insane reason you can only carry two guns. Seriously Gearbox? Youâ    … Expand
  67. LowIQsPrevail
    Jun 16, 2011
    10
    Sort these user reviews by rating and take a close look at all the reds. Look at all the intelligent comments posted there such as "graphics" ...as if graphics are what makes a game fun. Guess all these enlightened people would not enjoy a game like Plants vs Zombies due to the lack of bleeding edge graphics. Those who mention graphics about ANY game - you are completely stupid - noSort these user reviews by rating and take a close look at all the reds. Look at all the intelligent comments posted there such as "graphics" ...as if graphics are what makes a game fun. Guess all these enlightened people would not enjoy a game like Plants vs Zombies due to the lack of bleeding edge graphics. Those who mention graphics about ANY game - you are completely stupid - no seriously you need to get off the internet. DNF is FUN - it's childish, immature, crass, exactly what I was expecting. Yeah it's linear...so was Black Ops main campaign...but it managed to get "good reviews" by IGN and Gamespot...the spineless reviewers that they are. DNF is fun for those who know what they are getting into ahead of time...I will for sure be replaying it and hope to enjoy the multiplayer - esp. capture the babe for as long as a few faithful players hang around for it. In closing...those of you who claim to have a brain in your head, read all the red comments and see how lacking of substance they are...obviously written by 6 year old kids during their lunch breaks at school and their source of information came from some emo waste of life. Thanks to all the negative reviews, a lot of money that might have gone to a future project that might have had more updated features will probably never happen. Thanks, you brainless f*cktards.… Expand
  68. BNH
    Jun 16, 2011
    9
    After 12 years, it better be good! And while its a decent game it does not live up to the hype that it has built after 12 years. Its not the ground breaking tech game that they always said it would be. The Single player is ok, but could use less of the crude humor and more innovative gameplay. It doesn't feel right not having multiple weapons, or health. Gone is the thrill of findingAfter 12 years, it better be good! And while its a decent game it does not live up to the hype that it has built after 12 years. Its not the ground breaking tech game that they always said it would be. The Single player is ok, but could use less of the crude humor and more innovative gameplay. It doesn't feel right not having multiple weapons, or health. Gone is the thrill of finding Atomic health. They shouldn't of turned it into another regen based shooter with a 2 gun limit. The game is extremely easy, even on the hardest difficulty. I would of preferred the hardest difficulty to use the old style health system. The Multiplayer is fun, especially with friends, but the Co-Op mode is sorely missed! Many gamers are upset and giving Duke bad reviews because of this alone. If DNF had Co-Op many gamers would be more forgiving on their reviews and more would of purchased the game to play with thier friends.

    The load time on the PC is on average is 2 to 5 seconds, versus the Xbox at nearly a minute. The textures, sounds, graphics are also superior on the PC. However there is too much blur, so had to turn off post processing effects to make the game less nausuating.

    Overall its a fun game, but could of been done alot better. Many negative reviews are comming from people disappointed after so much hype, or they played the console versions.    … Expand
  69. jpinks
    Jun 18, 2011
    8
    The game is what it is an old school shooter. Its what I expected for the most part. The only real gripes I have about it are the 2 weapon limit and regen health. Is it fun, YES its fun!! Is it really killer no. I really hope we can see more Duke Nukem without those limitations. Multiplayer is fun also always nice to shrink a friend and stomp him!!! I wish it were longer but its aThe game is what it is an old school shooter. Its what I expected for the most part. The only real gripes I have about it are the 2 weapon limit and regen health. Is it fun, YES its fun!! Is it really killer no. I really hope we can see more Duke Nukem without those limitations. Multiplayer is fun also always nice to shrink a friend and stomp him!!! I wish it were longer but its a good game, the critics are totally missing the point that its an old school shooter. Its meant to be fun and enjoyable, not Call of Duty or Battlefield 9 billion. It is what it is and thats fun. I hope Serious Sam is too. Games are for enjoyment not a wanna be paramilitary lifestyle. LOL.… Expand
  70. furnaman
    Oct 18, 2011
    1
    Duke nukem is 15 hours and $10 of my life i wont get back . I feel like i just repurchased the orange box with a stripper pole on the cover . the graphics are not where they should be .some of the comedy is ok once but not twice actually have turned the volume off. the duke sold us out
  71. GaMsTeRcRiTiC
    Jul 11, 2011
    4
    The game has outdated graphics and gameplay mechanisms, and is extremely buggy, and is unable to support more then three enemies on a screen at a time. But the game does mix itself up by having severals interacting throughout it, but the puzzles get repetive and are fairly clich'e. But it's not the worst game, but is only good for rent, do not buy it.
  72. mASTERbLASTER1
    Mar 29, 2013
    10
    A great classic Duke romp. The reason it gets so much hate, is because expecations are far too high because of the very extended dev time. This is a triple A game and deserves that respect. Great fun. decent graphics by todays standards.
  73. Mark2606
    Feb 14, 2012
    7
    This game is a SOLID 7. It's plenty fun, entertaining and will keep you engaged. Certainly worth six bucks. I got the game and the DLC for about ten. The game is linear, but open. Fun shooter, decent graphics, not tedious. I don't like puzzles mixed in with my shooters, so I'm happy they kept it simple. Plus the game has the uninhibited eighties feel when chicks and bad languageThis game is a SOLID 7. It's plenty fun, entertaining and will keep you engaged. Certainly worth six bucks. I got the game and the DLC for about ten. The game is linear, but open. Fun shooter, decent graphics, not tedious. I don't like puzzles mixed in with my shooters, so I'm happy they kept it simple. Plus the game has the uninhibited eighties feel when chicks and bad language didn't get everyone's panties in a twist. Good job, Take Two. I'll be buying your next installment. I take points off for linear game play and short campaign length.… Expand
  74. digdilem
    Jun 5, 2012
    1
    The humour was totally mis-judged, took what was a great aspect of the original 3d and totally blew it. The game itself was pretty "Meh", but I was cringing throughout at the unfunny jokes and the incredibly over-use of catchphrases. Killed what should have been ace, and certainly had all the hype and buildup of something worthwhile. Shame on the developers.
  75. slartibartfas
    May 27, 2012
    0
    The most annoying game I've played for ten years. My rating: -10. Extremely annoying jump and run parts stopped me from playing the game to the finish.
  76. Dyhard
    Jul 2, 2011
    10
    Not sure why the reviewers are trashing the game, think has something to do with them not recieving advanced copies to review. I found the entire game entertaining, and not sure what people are playing when they say its boring, theres alot more fun content in this game compared to most FPS shooters I've played of late. I hope to see a level editor or a followup game to this franchise soon.
  77. pumbaz
    May 29, 2012
    1
    When DNF was released it was challenged by various lawsuits for the serious problems the game had with the STEAM network. (Extracting credit card info and private info from the user) Its a very bad ONLINE GAME and had some untested bugs that left the buyer who spent $50 during the first release unable to play the game unless it was connected to the internet. It was QA tested by a veryWhen DNF was released it was challenged by various lawsuits for the serious problems the game had with the STEAM network. (Extracting credit card info and private info from the user) Its a very bad ONLINE GAME and had some untested bugs that left the buyer who spent $50 during the first release unable to play the game unless it was connected to the internet. It was QA tested by a very unprofessional and not very smart team of bumbling bird brains in Dublin who did everything possible to put out legal fires. I simply got my money back and behind the store counter was a PILE of returned copies of the PC version of DNF. If you tried to ask the company why they didn't advertise it as an ONLINE game, they delete your account or don't answer you. What a terrible release that was so long in the waiting.… Expand
  78. BrainLazy
    Jun 20, 2011
    7
    The overall feeling of the game is mixed. You have some parts that feel complete in an isolated sense but nothing that is gelling it all together. There was plenty of times that I thought to myself, â
  79. attilab
    Jul 3, 2011
    4
    Duke is a lot like Gordon, he looses his breath after running for 5 seconds, has to run and hide like a wimp every time something happens, and can't seem to figure out how to jump over a 3 foot fence at times (crappy level design) even though the whole world is depending on him. The game is very similar to HL2 except this one has boobs/chicks, cursing and better art. Very similar gameDuke is a lot like Gordon, he looses his breath after running for 5 seconds, has to run and hide like a wimp every time something happens, and can't seem to figure out how to jump over a 3 foot fence at times (crappy level design) even though the whole world is depending on him. The game is very similar to HL2 except this one has boobs/chicks, cursing and better art. Very similar game play...It's all the same hand holding crap, useless cut scenes you can't skip, lame boring puzzles, long loading screens and short levels with crappy scripted AI trying to force you into a choke point. The differences are the weapons are actually cool but you can only carry a few which is what sucks more then anything in most games made after 2005. The game is boring just like HL2 was so if you liked HL2 you might like this game... at least your not suck with a mute.… Expand
  80. RsinX
    Jul 3, 2011
    1
    D.N. Forever..? I think NOT! ... It's seriously one of the most pointless and mind-less shoot-em-up games out there. You really don't need a sophisticated brain to play this one. The particular content of this game is a BAD influence for anyone... There is NO real story to this game... and the immoral content of the sex/nudity, LOL, only pathetic losers that can't get a real woman playD.N. Forever..? I think NOT! ... It's seriously one of the most pointless and mind-less shoot-em-up games out there. You really don't need a sophisticated brain to play this one. The particular content of this game is a BAD influence for anyone... There is NO real story to this game... and the immoral content of the sex/nudity, LOL, only pathetic losers that can't get a real woman play this trash game for the stripper chicks... Who the hell wants to watch and fantasize fake digital chicks strip?.. That's SO PATHETIC!!!! The ONLY reason I gave it a 1 is because of the graphics and sounds are decent...… Expand
  81. Teaser38
    Oct 13, 2011
    5
    Single player is short, DLC short. I'm pretty sure I made it though in less than 8 hours Honestly, I don't know who would play the multi-player in this game.

    I found some of the old school game play refreshing and overall the game works well. There are clunky jumping puzzles though.

    Definitely buy the game for old times sake, just don't spend more than $10.
  82. UnKidreal
    Jun 19, 2011
    9
    Ð
  83. roboticsun
    Jul 13, 2012
    3
    DNF may not be a bad game but it's really a bad duke nukem game. But still have to thank Gearbox for finishing this game although it's more of a nightmare. First, all the weapons feel like crap. None of the awesome weapons in the Duke Nukem 3d feel powerful in this game except railgun maybe. and you can only equip two weapons at a time. so most time you just have to run and gun like inDNF may not be a bad game but it's really a bad duke nukem game. But still have to thank Gearbox for finishing this game although it's more of a nightmare. First, all the weapons feel like crap. None of the awesome weapons in the Duke Nukem 3d feel powerful in this game except railgun maybe. and you can only equip two weapons at a time. so most time you just have to run and gun like in most generic FPS. I mean it just does not feel like Duke nukem at all. The level design is not good either. Most encounters feel like playing a standard call of duty game which I clearly do not like. The only thing they manage to keep the theme of Duke Nukem with cheesy jokes. Overall this game is fun a few hours but quickly fun factors just fade away then it became a mediocre modern FPS. 3 out of 10.… Expand
  84. niteme
    Dec 7, 2013
    3
    I expected a bit more from a remake of what use to be a good game. The weapon system is a bit jacked but the worst of it comes when you try to find your way around. I've been playing FPS since the 90's and although I do find myself lost from time to time... in duke nukem you'll be lost most of the time. Poor level design can really make for break a game.
  85. Khallighanm
    Aug 28, 2011
    2
    I bought more than 100 games on steam, and never regreted the money i spent on them. Until i bought Duke Nukem Forever. This game sucks in all aspects: Graphics, engine, physics, story, animation, number of enemies... You can feel that the game was bad coded, and if you have any expectations for this... just forget it. I can say for sure that this was the greatest let down on my entireI bought more than 100 games on steam, and never regreted the money i spent on them. Until i bought Duke Nukem Forever. This game sucks in all aspects: Graphics, engine, physics, story, animation, number of enemies... You can feel that the game was bad coded, and if you have any expectations for this... just forget it. I can say for sure that this was the greatest let down on my entire gamer life. This game is not worth of all the hype that sorround it, and even less the price being charged. This game dont worth 50 bucks. This dont even worth 15 dollars. Seriosly, save your money or buy another game.… Expand
  86. razvyan
    Aug 4, 2011
    6
    this game merit this note because is too simple and too short .
  87. Diosys
    Sep 7, 2011
    6
    This is one of those, good for one play games. It continues off basically where the last Duke Nukem left off. However, it uses a game play system heavily outdated as combat is very simplistic, with the exception to a few extraordinary enemies. The basic unit encounters are more of a challenge then their boss counterparts. This is literally a game out of its time.
  88. Ears14U
    Oct 11, 2011
    6
    I started playing this game with high hopes. The graphics are very good, the sound also and the smart-A attitude that is fitting for Duke was all in alignment. Now as I'm enjoying the game so far, this shrinking to a mini-me duke just made me say to myself: "Now you've got to be kidding me right?" I believe that is what ruined a perfectly great game, is trying to copy the old show "Land ofI started playing this game with high hopes. The graphics are very good, the sound also and the smart-A attitude that is fitting for Duke was all in alignment. Now as I'm enjoying the game so far, this shrinking to a mini-me duke just made me say to myself: "Now you've got to be kidding me right?" I believe that is what ruined a perfectly great game, is trying to copy the old show "Land of the Giants" series from '68-70'. I mean I was watching that as a teenager, and it was great for it's time....Lord I'm dating myself...HA! Anyways, if you can pick this up for a very low price, like $2.99-$3.99 off Steam? Then you won't be sort of pissed that you spent so much on a game that had HUGE potential. No pun intended either. Thanks for taking the time to read my post! As always, God bless you and have fun always!… Expand
  89. shadowrun
    Oct 13, 2011
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. duke nukem fans will love DNF. but sadly after a very long and tragic development, duke nukem forever is a mess. but before we play the blame game lets get the bad points adressed with DNF before the good. the pacing of the game is all over the place. with dull puzzles and platforming. with some design stuck in the late nineties then in the year 2011. but what 3d realms may have stumbled on. gearbox tryed its very best to make this game as good as its going to get. as a life long fan of duke it was a very bittersweet game to play. to laughing my ass off to the christian bale joke at the start of the game. or the classic nod to the legend of leeroy jenkins. to the grind of jumping from cog to cog as mini duke. or some of the dull boss fights. but the spirit of duke thoughout the game is still alive by the awesome musings of the voice of duke john st john so there is still hope that duke will reclaim his crown as the king of fps in the next duke game. its such a shame this game wasnt the classic we waited 12+ years for. but its ok. not great... but worth a play for any duke nukem fan.… Expand
  90. MelonPan
    Jul 24, 2012
    4
    you can actually tell what game was popular at the time a given section of this game was designed because of how transparently it tries to rip it off, only to abandon that a few minutes later for a different game. The PC port is buggy and I experienced constant freezing, the single player is a lot less intense while limited to only two weapons at a time, and even the multiplayer is ayou can actually tell what game was popular at the time a given section of this game was designed because of how transparently it tries to rip it off, only to abandon that a few minutes later for a different game. The PC port is buggy and I experienced constant freezing, the single player is a lot less intense while limited to only two weapons at a time, and even the multiplayer is a mediocre experience, which is not something you'd expect from a multiplayer game with shrink rays, freezing guns, and rocket launchers.… Expand
  91. Invader-Nik
    Oct 8, 2012
    5
    I never played the classic Duke Nukem games, but I heard about how good they were so I decided to get this, seeing it was Duke Nukem. The gameplay is linear indeed, lots of sleaze and nudity, and Duke's commentary. The start of the game felt like some sort of celebrity simulator, The alien animation is rather retarded, the Pigcops jump at you and slide in the same position against yourI never played the classic Duke Nukem games, but I heard about how good they were so I decided to get this, seeing it was Duke Nukem. The gameplay is linear indeed, lots of sleaze and nudity, and Duke's commentary. The start of the game felt like some sort of celebrity simulator, The alien animation is rather retarded, the Pigcops jump at you and slide in the same position against your player model. Your health or 'ego' recharges very quickly making the game too easy. At times it feels like playing a Half Life game, especially in the mine -_-

    Still a fun game, nothing new about it    … Expand
  92. AeroAtlas
    Dec 6, 2011
    5
    The feel, look, and gameplay of this is just horrid. I honestly think they just messed it up, but wasted to much money to scrap it, so they released it. If i didn't buy this on steam I would have returned it :P
    But its still playable..sorta, so I'll give it a 5. It could have been a cool game. Leveling up Duke's health by doing ego boosting activities seemed really cool. But it just felt    The feel, look, and gameplay of this is just horrid. I honestly think they just messed it up, but wasted to much money to scrap it, so they released it. If i didn't buy this on steam I would have returned it :P
    But its still playable..sorta, so I'll give it a 5. It could have been a cool game. Leveling up Duke's health by doing ego boosting activities seemed really cool. But it just felt and looked like garbage. 5/10    … Expand
  93. JonathanM
    Mar 10, 2012
    6
    Duke Nukem... As a kid, I was fascinated with Duke Nukem 3D, and it was easily my favorite game, and I can still say it is within my top 20 favorite games. So naturally, hearing that there would be another addition to the series, Duke Nukem Forever, I figured wow, another one!? I gotta play it. Years went by, and no word on its release, and I forgot about it, up until around mid 2010, whenDuke Nukem... As a kid, I was fascinated with Duke Nukem 3D, and it was easily my favorite game, and I can still say it is within my top 20 favorite games. So naturally, hearing that there would be another addition to the series, Duke Nukem Forever, I figured wow, another one!? I gotta play it. Years went by, and no word on its release, and I forgot about it, up until around mid 2010, when I again saw that it was being worked on. When the day finally came around for its release, I bought it right when it was available. Was it good? No. Was it bad? No. It was somewhere in the middle. While it had its good elements, such as classic one-liners, potty humor, and good first person combat and shooting mechanism, it lacked a driven story line, good multiplayer, and graphics (I'm not one for grading down on graphics, usually, but in this case, it was all created on the outdated Unreal 2.5 engine, which lowers my score for it a bit.) I was also disappointed to see it take the road of most modern First Person Shooters by, instead of having a health meter and requiring health powerups, gave Duke an "Ego" meter, which regenerates if no damage is taken for a short period of time. However, I did like the single player campaign. It was perfectly blended with the difficulty rising as the story progressed, and the campaign offered some good humor and pop cultural reference, just like in DN3D. Nice touch. So to sum it all up, Duke Nukem Forever is not a good or bad game, it is somewhere in the middle. Does it deserve a play through? Absolutely, give it a try.… Expand
  94. MiyazuHime
    Mar 18, 2012
    6
    So long waited and many times delayed sequel of the Duke Nukem's game is out here now. It's not perfect, but at least it got something that other game don't have - an unique character, a **** hero. An atmosphere is done well, you actually can feel yourself as "god" for every men and women in the city and of course for your lovely girls. A game begins with invasion of aliens and retiredSo long waited and many times delayed sequel of the Duke Nukem's game is out here now. It's not perfect, but at least it got something that other game don't have - an unique character, a **** hero. An atmosphere is done well, you actually can feel yourself as "god" for every men and women in the city and of course for your lovely girls. A game begins with invasion of aliens and retired Duke have to safe the world again. Story itself is good for a shooter, but it won't give you something deep. The graphics are average for todays games, you won't get displeased by it. Weapon choice is not big, but is enough to rip your enemy, also you can fight with your fists. There are some usable items like a beer, drugs that give you bonus to attack and etc. In some levels of the game you will have to get shrunk with help of shrunk machine and then overcome puzzles and obstacles to move forward on the game. It's fun to be shrunk, you can see all the items from different angle, which you wouldn't ever see, also the Duke's voice "shrunk" too. Driving a jeep is horrible, even if it gives a different gameplay, it's not worth it. The huge hog bosses are cool, that's what you hope to see in every game. But if want something more from this game, but it won't give you nothing more. The hard work not always provide a big success, that's what can be said about this game. Of course if you played old games of Duke Nukem's, don't miss this out too.… Expand
  95. dumle
    Jul 30, 2012
    5
    Duke nukem forever is not a bad game, its just pretty generic.The duke charm is there and does set it apart from other games but everything else from weapon design to enemy design screams of generic fps. There is some nice level design in here but i never goes full duke. Heck the game even has the modern two weapon limit. Pick this one up for a cheap price if you feel like playing aDuke nukem forever is not a bad game, its just pretty generic.The duke charm is there and does set it apart from other games but everything else from weapon design to enemy design screams of generic fps. There is some nice level design in here but i never goes full duke. Heck the game even has the modern two weapon limit. Pick this one up for a cheap price if you feel like playing a mindless shooter for a couple of hours otherwise you should stay away.… Expand
  96. brendonsmall
    Jul 8, 2012
    3
    I was just really, really disappointed. I have played the Duke Nukem PC games since Duke 1, through Duke 3D and now Forever. The game is kind of funny sometimes, but the humour wears out really quickly, and the frustrating combat mechanics and lack of save game feature made me put it down. I played for about 90 minutes, and I think I'm done trying to like it.

    Just, meh. I really want my    I was just really, really disappointed. I have played the Duke Nukem PC games since Duke 1, through Duke 3D and now Forever. The game is kind of funny sometimes, but the humour wears out really quickly, and the frustrating combat mechanics and lack of save game feature made me put it down. I played for about 90 minutes, and I think I'm done trying to like it.

    Just, meh. I really want my $20 bucks back. If you can get it on sale for $5 or maybe $10 and you really liked the other games a lot, then maybe check it out. Otherwise, don't bother. I wish I had preserved the fantasy that DNF would be really funny and fun to play.    … Expand
  97. 7FoX
    Nov 24, 2013
    4
    This is an example that not only humor, graphics and some hot women model is the only important in a Duke Nukem Game, I bet the cancelled 2001 game would be better than this one.
  98. Brute1995
    Sep 28, 2012
    4
    I came in expecting nothing, having never played the original doom. Let me start off by saying that the game is definitely "badass,' the GUI is interesting and looks great. But the gameplay? It reminds me of the programming work that Infinity Ward put into MW3. They obviously didn't put any good development into this game, it feels rushed. I don't enjoy it, although I enjoyed the first DLCI came in expecting nothing, having never played the original doom. Let me start off by saying that the game is definitely "badass,' the GUI is interesting and looks great. But the gameplay? It reminds me of the programming work that Infinity Ward put into MW3. They obviously didn't put any good development into this game, it feels rushed. I don't enjoy it, although I enjoyed the first DLC (Black Ops themed) It has some humor, although some of it gets bland after some time.
    The great thing though, my 8 year old nephew enjoys this game. Money well spent! $10.00 from summer sale.    … Expand
  99. FERNANDES_br_RJ
    Jan 12, 2013
    10
    Great game, nice to play, good multyplay, lovely character it is simple and has action, has nice enemys and I want more, please make a new Duke Nukem game, now do in sandbox style, like Farcry 3 and Dead Island, please, dont going to do a linear game again, the game could be better, if it was exploration with maps, principal missions and side quest. The rest of it, is a rockroll game.Great game, nice to play, good multyplay, lovely character it is simple and has action, has nice enemys and I want more, please make a new Duke Nukem game, now do in sandbox style, like Farcry 3 and Dead Island, please, dont going to do a linear game again, the game could be better, if it was exploration with maps, principal missions and side quest. The rest of it, is a rockroll game. Nice to play.… Expand
  100. ERB
    Jul 24, 2013
    7
    I like it you can do anything!
Page:

Awards & Rankings

14
#14 Most Discussed PC Game of 2011
29
#29 Most Shared PC Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
54

Mixed or average reviews - based on 48 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 48
  2. Mixed: 24 out of 48
  3. Negative: 17 out of 48
  1. GamingXP
    Sep 12, 2011
    55
    Duke Nukem Forever would be quite decent if one felt entirely certain it's intended purely as a self-parody. As is, it doesn't do the expectations, the buyer or the Duke justice – oh, had he rather remained a vaporware legend!
    Read full review
  2. PC Gamer UK
    Aug 6, 2011
    29
    Petty, nasty and anachronistic. Duke is only relevant as a warning from the past. Avoid these mistakes, developers. [Aug 2011, p.76]
  3. FiringSquad
    Aug 1, 2011
    72
    Bottom line: Duke Nukem Forever was not worth the 15-year wait, nor is it worth paying the full $50. However, I cannot deny that I thought it was both fun and funny, which at the end of the day is what this franchise is all about.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »