User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 1754 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Sep 15, 2017
    0
    This Game is very good, great story with amazing graphics and sounds. You can choose to play either Corvo or Emily, and they play so different….

    Unfortunately you need a beefy pc to play this super smooth at 1080p with 60fps on ultra...I had to get and 1080ti On my i74770k@4.4MHZ to get stable 60FPS! Let’s hope the Dishonored: Death of the Outsider DLC plays better as this game
    This Game is very good, great story with amazing graphics and sounds. You can choose to play either Corvo or Emily, and they play so different….

    Unfortunately you need a beefy pc to play this super smooth at 1080p with 60fps on ultra...I had to get and 1080ti On my i74770k@4.4MHZ to get stable 60FPS!

    Let’s hope the Dishonored: Death of the Outsider DLC plays better as this game really deserve more optimization!
    Expand
  2. Sep 13, 2017
    7
    I am reviewing this game in the state it is NOW. It runs perfectly well on my hardware (FX-6300 + R9 380) @ 1680x1050 and high settings. The game is good. more or less the same as the original. A little overrated.
  3. Sep 2, 2017
    10
    One of the greatest "play-it-your-way" games I've encountered. The sense of freedom when completing missions is amazing. Truly great game! The first Dishonoured game was quite good but this one outshines it and most other games too!
  4. Aug 25, 2017
    7
    A genuinely enjoyable successor to DIshonored, if not quite as captivating, however the poor state in which it was originally launched and in which it remained for over a month can't be ignored. The artwork is quite good and the story and gameplay are decent, though not quite as engaging as the first Dishonored, but combined with the relatively short playthrough time and underwhelmingA genuinely enjoyable successor to DIshonored, if not quite as captivating, however the poor state in which it was originally launched and in which it remained for over a month can't be ignored. The artwork is quite good and the story and gameplay are decent, though not quite as engaging as the first Dishonored, but combined with the relatively short playthrough time and underwhelming ending these can't make up for the sorry state of the game's initial release. Expand
  5. Aug 20, 2017
    7
    Good game, but by the middle it has become boring for me. The plot could not catch up to the end and the game turned into a senseless carving of all living things on a level.
  6. Aug 14, 2017
    8
    Game with descent combat system killed by lots of stealth. Quick and responsive action, interesting story and huge variativity means best sandbox experience twenty-sixteen you ever had.
  7. Aug 10, 2017
    3
    I absolutely love Dishonored—the original. It’s one of the best stealth games out there. And I really wanted to like its sequel. But Dishonored 2 has a critical flaw: It was rushed to market. For PC gamers, D2 was a debacle at release. Nearly one year later, it’s still a substandard heap of been there, done that. Not only is D2 a giant leap backwards in graphics and performance, it doesn’tI absolutely love Dishonored—the original. It’s one of the best stealth games out there. And I really wanted to like its sequel. But Dishonored 2 has a critical flaw: It was rushed to market. For PC gamers, D2 was a debacle at release. Nearly one year later, it’s still a substandard heap of been there, done that. Not only is D2 a giant leap backwards in graphics and performance, it doesn’t push other franchise elements forward. Ultimately, D2 drops the ball in every conceivable way. Arkane Studios and Bethesda ought to be ashamed.

    I was as excited as a kid on Christmas morning when it came time to download and install D2. 48 hours later, I uninstalled it without progressing past the second level. I gave it another go 8 months later. Still trashed. Graphics are despicable. Draw distances are incredibly short. Textures constantly pop in and out. Jagged lines everywhere. Some environments look flat and washed out while others are blindingly oversaturated. Character models and animations are comparable to N64 games. D2 is like a 15 year old title which was patched with a free HD mod by a novice coder.

    It gets worse. D2 implements horrid motion blur that makes me sick. Others have the same complaint. Even after adjusting the settings, I get motion sickness playing D2 for just an hour or so. So what should’ve been an enjoyable weekend experience took over a month to complete.

    To top it all off, frame rates are pathetic. Lowering the settings and resolution way down doesn’t fix problems. D2 runs poorly because its garbage. It's so incredibly unoptimized, my rig runs on average of 8-10°C hotter when playing it versus other major games. I installed an additional 120mm fan to compensate. Otherwise D2 will melt my computer, literally.

    Sound design is terrible as well because directional audio is broken. NPC’s and enemies will be across the street, but their voices are heard next to the player. Footstep locations can’t be accurately pinned down. I can’t tell if enemies are above me, below me, or if they moved right or left. Since nonlethal playthru’s require lots of creeping, locating enemies by sound is vital. Arkane also recycled ambient music from the original game. Lazy.

    The original Dishonored is no visual masterpiece, but it’s still superb in its own right. It successfully achieves a bleak aesthetic by resembling the dreary portraits featured in game. More importantly, the original focused on gameplay over graphics. So performance is slick and visuals are crisp even if things look a tad basic. The developer—Arkane Studio—used the Unreal Engine 3 engine which is a tried and true platform. And Arkane had prior experience with UE. For D2, Arkane used the Void Engine, a rebadged id Tech 5 engine. Only 3 or 4 developers have implemented the Tech 5 engine, so it’s a relatively unused medium. And based on my experiences with Rage, Wolfenstein:TNO and Dishonored 2, I can see why. I bet Bethesda pushed Arkane to use an in house engine to cut cost. And gamers suffer. If Arkane had stuck with the Unreal Engine, I’m certain D2 would be significantly better.

    D2’s story is average and dull. The opening scene is so over-the-top that I rolled my eyes and set aside all urgency. Basically, a wizard lady turns people into stone, orders the immediate execution of imperial supporters, but inexplicably spares a deadly assassin who’s friends with an ancient deity that imbued him with mystical powers. Next!! The hero’s sudden helplessness doesn’t fit, unless of course there’s a wizard lady with amazeballs powers. Sure, the first Dishonored followed a similar formula, but it’s executed more thoughtfully. The story and the world feel believable. The characters are more relatable, and treacherous. At the end, I was happy to get sweet revenge.

    In D2, I was happy when it finally ended, except the ending sucks. The narrative is weak, characters aren’t compelling, and the lore isn’t accurately represented in the atmospheric settings. Voice acting negatively impacts the story as well. The heroes’ whiney expositions are ill-suited and cliché. It’s a mixed bag despite the Hollywood talent.

    The ONLY thing D2 gets right is gameplay. It’s more of the same except gamers can now assume the role of Emily. She has different powers than Corvo which encourages multiple playthru’s once the motion sickness passes. No thanks.

    For me, D2 is unplayable. Motion sickness aside, D2 runs so poorly I can’t enjoy it. I didn’t expect the sequel to be as remarkable as the original Dishonored, but I expect it to be at least technically superior. Bioshock: Infinite and Mass Effect 2 are shining examples of games which improve on their predecessors. D2 could’ve been one of those games. Unfortunately, it’s the exact opposite. Even on sale, I can’t recommend D2. But I wholeheartedly recommend Bioshock: Infinite and the original Dishonored.
    Expand
  8. Jul 30, 2017
    10
    A masterpiece. Game and level design are examples of their kind, art is everywhere (sfx, music, charadesign, architecture), steampunk ambiance gorgeous, the game mechanics are just great. Ultra customisable. I love it.
  9. Jul 30, 2017
    5
    Graphics, sound, all ok. Setting and story isn't that bad, writing is ok. I have a good PC so no perf problems (though a bit slow admittedly).

    My problem is that I feel this stealth has been designed to punish stealth gameplay. It tells you to stealth, then gives you no f*cking tools to actually do it. I guess this is as much of a stealth game as like, call of duty. In fact forget it,
    Graphics, sound, all ok. Setting and story isn't that bad, writing is ok. I have a good PC so no perf problems (though a bit slow admittedly).

    My problem is that I feel this stealth has been designed to punish stealth gameplay. It tells you to stealth, then gives you no f*cking tools to actually do it. I guess this is as much of a stealth game as like, call of duty. In fact forget it, call of duty actually has more stealth mechanics than this.

    Robots, enemy positioning, patrol routes, skills, upgrades, runes ....etc are all specifically made to make stealth not actually work. The gun ho approach is more fun and better, except there's better gun ho games out there.

    Stuck between a rock and a hard place. Tries to be action game and is designed specifically to tell you to stealth. Tries to be a stealth game except everything is designed to make stealth not actually work with no gameplay or tools at your disposal to actually stealth.

    One glaring example is the robots. On a stealth playthrough, what do you do to robots? Avoid them? Patrol routes designed specifically make them specifically unavoidable. Stealth kill them? Mechanics make that specifically impossible to do or take way too many resources. Kill them? That will raise alarms and ruin the usefulness of your stealth style upgrade investments, so in fact they're not that easy to kill with no upgrades.

    The last game suffered from the same problem, but it's MUCH MUCH more glaringly worse this time. They need to fire their entire gameplay design team and hire one that can actually design a stealth action game. The old design team can come help us make more call of duty titles.
    Expand
  10. Jul 12, 2017
    1
    The game is unplayable on PC. Had to delete and get the refund.
    Games like this (completely broken, in terms of optimization) - are non existent for me. I simply PASS on them all together and I highly recommend everyone does it. This is the only way to MAKE the developer do their job. If they DON'T WANT us to buy and play their game - WHY should we??
  11. Jul 9, 2017
    10
    I played this through a couple of times when it first came out last fall. I went back to it last week and am in a fourth play through. Simply put, this game is brilliant - it's a game for the thinking gamer. Sophisticated, beautiful, great story with great writing. All games should be of this caliber. 'Nuff said.
  12. Jul 6, 2017
    9
    Gameplay : 9
    Graphics : 7
    Story : 8
    Sound : 8
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 9
  13. Jun 24, 2017
    1
    one of the worst games i ever bought in my entire life
    100% scripted and boring , you need 4-7 sword swings per enemy , some enemies can 1 hit you or other bs like that , if i want 0 freedom of choice i would watch a movie
  14. Jun 20, 2017
    6
    This game has really well done art design and a lovely style.
    However, while the visuals are nice and the game runs decent on my system, I can't help but wonder about the fun factor.
    I've managed my way into the third level and have so far neither experienced any attachment to the characters nor am I really interested in the story so far. It all seems kind of vague - go here, do this,
    This game has really well done art design and a lovely style.
    However, while the visuals are nice and the game runs decent on my system, I can't help but wonder about the fun factor.
    I've managed my way into the third level and have so far neither experienced any attachment to the characters nor am I really interested in the story so far.

    It all seems kind of vague - go here, do this, go there and do that.
    While the game tries to somehow pack these single missions together, it really reminds me about the random quests one has to endure in countless RPGs.
    Somewhat detracting from the fun as well is the AI, which has spotted me several times, while I was cowering behind walls or obstacles.

    So to sum it up, I've bought a game that hasn't got a great story going for it, the plot missions mimic fetch quests from RPGs and even though the game tries to place itself as a stealth game, enemies are able to detect you behind obstacles and walls.
    I had a great time exploring the first Dishonored and was really looking forward to this sequel, but so far I've got the feeling that I didn't get my money's worth...
    Expand
  15. Jun 14, 2017
    10
    Афигенная игра. В ней нет прям чего то нового, но она не хуже прошлой, все понравилось!
  16. Jun 12, 2017
    6
    The game is good.
    Still it has 2 problems, same as first one.
    1. Lack of likable characters. I did like the faceless and voiceless Corvo, ok. However now - i dont care about Emily (becase I know nothing about her that can make me start doing so) she is faceless. She is not beautiful, she is not charismatic, she is not fun and in same moment she doesnt have any dark of gloomy sides of
    The game is good.
    Still it has 2 problems, same as first one.
    1. Lack of likable characters.
    I did like the faceless and voiceless Corvo, ok.
    However now - i dont care about Emily (becase I know nothing about her that can make me start doing so) she is faceless. She is not beautiful, she is not charismatic, she is not fun and in same moment she doesnt have any dark of gloomy sides of character to counter this and make her interesting.
    She is boring. I understand that world of the game is not a funny one, but do she really has some personalities that devide her in a good way from Corvo? Emotion spectre that they bring to you is the same (and its gray).
    Corvo also doesnt really work for me this time, he doesnt open up as a new deeper more complex person he is just old dad/man with quite a boring motivation.
    2. Lots of ways of killing - but concentration on peacefull playthrough. I dont know, maybe some kind of non-deadly bullets (from rubber idk) for pistol and more ways of disabling folks might change this? Cause its quite strange when you have a gun in your arm and dagger in another, but try your best to not use them a single time throughout the game.
    Expand
  17. Jun 11, 2017
    9
    Fantastic game, great game play slightly loose story with a slight lack of diversity. definitely not the star that the first one was but still fantastic.
  18. Jun 11, 2017
    4
    If not poor Tech. Graphics (not visualisation in overall) + Emulated Optimization and Console limited controls it can be a really great game.
    I will talk about annoying shortcomings:
    Graphics, world looks really nice, in overall it looks atmospheric, but soap is everywhere, for 2010-12y game I will say it's a good visualization for photorealistic game, but for 2016 and with its
    If not poor Tech. Graphics (not visualisation in overall) + Emulated Optimization and Console limited controls it can be a really great game.
    I will talk about annoying shortcomings:
    Graphics, world looks really nice, in overall it looks atmospheric, but soap is everywhere, for 2010-12y game I will say it's a good visualization for photorealistic game, but for 2016 and with its performance can't give it good score, below medium is maximum what can I give, also people look strange, ugly as in every Bethesda game, but more plastic, hair is also plastic, whole objects in the world look plastic, detalization and object quality is also bad for photorealistic game and for that performance, also game can't allocate all 6GB VRAM, textures, shadows and resolution quality does not affect VRAM at all and use RAM instead of VRAM (looks like console emulated game and not ported), also can't properly work with all CPU cores. Not stable FPS, after Doom Vulkan I really expect same quality Graphics, Performance and Stability, but it's not even close to RotTR, FPS can jump from 120 to 20, in combat sometimes you can get freezes, game does not even use VRAM, and use RAM instead of VRAM, and even RAM is not fully used, when it goes over 16GB it start to use SSD instead of allocating whole 32GB of RAM or use whole VRAM instead of 15% of it for GPU side processes, shortly Emulation, reminds me old console exclusive games that was played on PC by emulators.
    Controls are most annoying problem of this game, you can't control where to blink no matter where you're pointing at game always decide to where you will blink, under wall, at the wall, on the enemy, in front of enemy, but not where you want to, on the wall or behind the enemy... Ctrl block+grab also does not work properly, sometimes it does not have problems, but mostly instead of silent grab you will continuously Block...
    Texture and Geodata blackholes, yes like in old fashioned MMORPGs you can stuck in textures and even fall through, enemies can hide in walls or under the floor and shoot....
    Sound, not biggest problem after Fallout, but game can't work with dolby sound, directions are mixed, so you can hear voice from behind when enemy who makes that noise is in front of you, left from right, atc... Also no echo effects.
    Mostly game feels like Early Access game, not finished, and poorly coded, what developer should be to make so badly coded game on id tech for PC, if it will be a indie game, then will say OK, for small studio, but from AAA game and for its price I expect more than that.
    But, Other parts, like story, atmosphere, music, characters, enemies, are really great, interesting.

    Sorry for my bad English.
    Expand
  19. Jun 10, 2017
    1
    The game graphics is not better than the previous episode but the FPS is lower on mid-range PC (under 30FPS - 1080p - only High Settings). It's even crashed frequently every time playing. And WHAT THE HELL "VOID ENGINE" IS..?!
    Emily has a loud pistol at the first start, hard for silent kill.
    Story is not impressed and worse than Dishonored 1.
  20. May 22, 2017
    9
    I don't understand people who dislikes this game because of the poor performance on PC. GAME, GAME ITSELF is absolutely incredible. Everything in it. Level design, art design, story.
  21. May 11, 2017
    8
    it is a good game. Pros: good storyline, great gameplay, and last of all relatable and detailed characters (good graphics to). Cons: difficulty is very hard, even on normal or easy for some of the mission, and missions are a little repetitive (infiltrate, kill)
  22. Apr 20, 2017
    8
    The performance issues have been fixed as far as I've know.
    The story seems a little too familiar but that's ok. the changes you can make are awesome, there are actions that make a huge diffrence that I didn't know that was even possible (youtube)
    the Graphics are beautiful! the environments are amazing. the combat mechanics are super fun. just for the record I have an 2560x1440
    The performance issues have been fixed as far as I've know.
    The story seems a little too familiar but that's ok. the changes you can make are awesome, there are actions that make a huge diffrence that I didn't know that was even possible (youtube)
    the Graphics are beautiful! the environments are amazing. the combat mechanics are super fun.

    just for the record I have an 2560x1440 monitor with an i5-3570 @ stock and an rx 480. I get 35-40fps on maximum settings. I mean everything at max. I get 45-55 when I turn them slightly lower (no noticeable changes) I haven't tried minimum settings. take in mind that these are in WQHD not FHD. I assume you get 60fps with my card on 1080p
    Expand
  23. Apr 15, 2017
    10
    Performance acceptable with an i7 4770k and gtx980 and no stability issues. Perhaps they've patched it within the 5 months since launch. The comments from Nov 2016 suggest the game is bugged, but in April 2017 the game is working perfectly for me.

    The game is brilliant, a highly polished version of the original Dishonored. The paths through the levels are improved. The stealth and ghost
    Performance acceptable with an i7 4770k and gtx980 and no stability issues. Perhaps they've patched it within the 5 months since launch. The comments from Nov 2016 suggest the game is bugged, but in April 2017 the game is working perfectly for me.

    The game is brilliant, a highly polished version of the original Dishonored. The paths through the levels are improved. The stealth and ghost modes are improved. The player choices are increased. The story is improved. Everything about this game is a major improvement, and I already thought Dishonored the original was top-notch.

    Highly recommended. If you haven't already played the original Dishonored, play that first and the DLC as well. The story can be hard to follow without that background.
    Expand
  24. Mar 15, 2017
    10
    il miglior gioco che abbia mai giocato su pc questo gioco è quasi perfetto avrei solo voluto un po poù di colonna sonora che comunque cè ed è bella per il resto semplicemente stupendo migliora molto rispetto al primo la libertà di azione, per quanto riguarda le performance non ho avuto problemi avendolo giocato un mese dopo l'uscita
  25. Mar 14, 2017
    1
    I have what would be considered a high end system and really looked forward to the release of this. I held fire to gauge what opinion was and after all the talk of porting or performance issues i decided to hang fire and finish off other games i had on my pc or a bit more overwatch... I then decide after all this time to finally buy it as I loved the first dishonored and in general I am aI have what would be considered a high end system and really looked forward to the release of this. I held fire to gauge what opinion was and after all the talk of porting or performance issues i decided to hang fire and finish off other games i had on my pc or a bit more overwatch... I then decide after all this time to finally buy it as I loved the first dishonored and in general I am a huge fan of bethesda work.

    For reference Im running a MSI watercooled gtx 1080 with i4-4790k oc to 4.6ghz and 16gb ram. I was excited on the initial level because fps seemed fine around 80-120 fps but then as soon as you leave the first level it all goes **** up, fps dropping to 40-50 and it feels so stuttery.. I would say to decrease the visuals which I tried, I even tried going to very low/low settings and the results were so similar to running at very high/ultra about a 10-15 fps difference for what was a massive drop in visual quality sometimes no increase at all... showing that the game is very poorly optimised which is a massive let down

    friends on console loved this, but until they fix the optimisation issues on pc i would say don't waste your time. The game clearly has promise but stuttery and sluggish game play is not what I'm after
    Expand
  26. Mar 12, 2017
    8
    I really love the first game, although I went through it only in 2016, all hands did not reach. I have no new video card - gtx660 and the game runs fine on medium graphics settings. All sorts of beta patches are not installed. With the optimization problem is not faced.
    Completely about the plot, I can't tell yet, but he's good, and certainly no surprises. Just a good, clichéd plot. About
    I really love the first game, although I went through it only in 2016, all hands did not reach. I have no new video card - gtx660 and the game runs fine on medium graphics settings. All sorts of beta patches are not installed. With the optimization problem is not faced.
    Completely about the plot, I can't tell yet, but he's good, and certainly no surprises. Just a good, clichéd plot. About Royal assassin you can guess already sailed to a location associated with it.
    The most important part of the game is gameplay, and it's great. I play for Emily, she has a brand new ability, and that's cool, they are very good; I was particularly pleased with "Domino". Teleport her too, but looks a bit different - she is attracted to the place and it looks stylish.
    Locations are beautiful, sometimes eerie (for example, the place where the "good doctor"). The passage still variable as in the first part. But it seems to me that the enemies now are some seeing too.
    Fans of the first part just have to play the game, it is as good. But you will have lag or not to guess never. I bought and prepared myself for the horrible lag, but I probably was lucky, and I enjoy the game.
    Expand
  27. Mar 8, 2017
    10
    Yes, the game is more taxing than others from Bethesda. But don't get crazy - I could enjoy it with a 970. Now down to the point: this game is a labour of love from one of the very best game studio around the world. The art is breath taking, with mind blowing designs, render, and mad amount of skills pouring from every pixel. The level design is totally insane. Each level, even more thanYes, the game is more taxing than others from Bethesda. But don't get crazy - I could enjoy it with a 970. Now down to the point: this game is a labour of love from one of the very best game studio around the world. The art is breath taking, with mind blowing designs, render, and mad amount of skills pouring from every pixel. The level design is totally insane. Each level, even more than in the first game, is a show of gameplay twists build upon cool ideas and a powerful engine. Sound and music are wonderful, and the world itself is probably the best world creation at least in visual entertainment from the last decade. If you love gaming - and especially first person games - but don't play that one you'll be missing one of the most amazing creation in the field.
    Also the game is very generous. My first run lasted 37 hours. And I am positive I'll play it at least a second time. Then if you go for the full ghost run, you're in for even more hours of fun.
    Expand
  28. Feb 13, 2017
    0
    Release bugs aside (which haven't been fully taken care of to this day, months after release) the game isn't special. dishonored 1 was a great game with an enjoyable story and characters, this one doesn't offer any of that. it feels like a bland game and nothing motivates you to complete it.
  29. Feb 9, 2017
    5
    Has the Gameplay from the first game, some of it's characters and a story continuation. But nothing of it's fun.

    This was the worst game I ever had to get to run, straight refusing to even start, if the Internal Graphics card was not disabled. But never gave any hint as to why. It took days of getting it to start and trying to get it run acceptable. And after finishing it, I regret
    Has the Gameplay from the first game, some of it's characters and a story continuation. But nothing of it's fun.

    This was the worst game I ever had to get to run, straight refusing to even start, if the Internal Graphics card was not disabled. But never gave any hint as to why. It took days of getting it to start and trying to get it run acceptable. And after finishing it, I regret playing it for the most part.

    It looks terrible and has strong performance issues even on recent hardware. Gameplay is actually quite good, but unforgiving when playing it ghost stealthy. Story and characters are a cheap rehash and it get's worse the closer you get to the end. Nearly every mission plays the same, and hardly any new gameplay element is ever introduced. They dishonored a honorable franchise.
    Expand
  30. Feb 4, 2017
    9
    Great game, horrible port. The game is gorgeus, with so many diffrent paths to complete the missions, and so many diffrent powers to unlock and combine, without mentioning that you can now play as Corvo or Emily. It also has two endings for each character. The only problem I see here is the port. The optimazation is nowhere to be found, performance is pretty bad even in high end pc's.
    Buy
    Great game, horrible port. The game is gorgeus, with so many diffrent paths to complete the missions, and so many diffrent powers to unlock and combine, without mentioning that you can now play as Corvo or Emily. It also has two endings for each character. The only problem I see here is the port. The optimazation is nowhere to be found, performance is pretty bad even in high end pc's.
    Buy it if you have a powerful machine, if not, wait till it's totally fix.
    Expand
Metascore
86

Generally favorable reviews - based on 40 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 35 out of 40
  2. Negative: 0 out of 40
  1. Feb 7, 2017
    86
    Dishonored 2 is bigger and better than its forbearer, with greater variety of level design and even more flexible gameplay. It is a shame the central narrative isn’t more engaging and that the sequel is haunted by technical deficiencies.
  2. CD-Action
    Jan 13, 2017
    80
    Dishonored 2 exists to make you feel good. It gives you a lot of freedom in accomplishing your goals and keeps your adrenaline level constantly elevated. It’s a shame that it failed to shake off the original game’s drawbacks and is not as stylish. [01/2017, p.38]
  3. Jan 1, 2017
    90
    Weak story notwithstanding, Arkane Studios has again delivered a truly excellent stealth action game. [Issue#258, p.53]