- Publisher: Wild Games Studio
- Release Date: Sep 25, 2013
User Score
Overwhelming dislike- based on 1671 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 138 out of 1671
-
Mixed: 12 out of 1671
-
Negative: 1,521 out of 1671
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Oct 20, 2013Not worth your time or money!! Anyone who tells you otherwise is being payed by this developer to do so. They are also trying to silence people who put out honest critique.
-
Oct 20, 2013Buggy, not working game. Invisible walls on weird spots. Really just made/rushed to make money. Also the recent copyright thing that happened. Just awful. Never going to play this game again, totally regret buying it. Please, stay away from this, at least until it is complete. Maybe someday that will happen. Probably not.
-
Oct 20, 2013
-
Oct 20, 2013I have and never will play this game. I was thinking of trying it out but after learning that this company censored bad reviews! You aren't getting a cent from me!
-
Oct 20, 2013devs are lying trash the game is horrific dont buy this garbage save your money do not buy this trash the oppose free speach they are disgusting people trhat lye cheat and steal your money
-
Oct 20, 2013
-
Oct 20, 2013There are people who can build online profiles for you... for one, all the comment styles are way too similar, secondly the only game they've reviewed is this one. Don't really care if this game's good or not, but fake reviews and taking down reviews, that's just really not good business.
-
Oct 20, 2013This game is total garbage and the company behind this is completely DISGUSTING. They have tried to manipulate people into believing this game is something that it is NOT. Do not buy this game! Do not give this company a single penny! So disappointed...
-
Oct 20, 2013
-
Oct 20, 2013this game is total rubbish! if you buy this you need to be put down. why would you pick on a reviewer you gave a code to? spastic a-holes... please refrain from making anymore games ever
-
Oct 20, 2013
-
Oct 20, 2013No. Just no. Furthermore the company behind this, specifically the CEO have been censoring the web from critics, having youtube videos with bad reviews taken down. Just trust me, this game is just No.
-
Oct 20, 2013There's this thing called the SDLC in programming, "Software Development Life Cycle" and a BIG part of it, probably the MOST important part in commercialisation of a program, is bug checking and fixing. They skipped that part. They took existing IP that has great enjoyment potential and did nothing with it.
-
Oct 20, 2013This is a broken game. It shouldn't be on Steam, it shouldn't even be at all. And the developers are who can't take critic, flagging review for copy rights infringement abusing YouTube's systems. Any game made by Wild Games Studio should be ignored from now on.
-
Oct 20, 2013Biggest fail ever. The developer of the company is a con artist. All of the 10 votes on here are from the company trying to make their game look good. They are also hitting YouTubers with copyright strikes which can cost them their YouTube career. Horrible game, evil company.
-
Oct 20, 2013The devs obviously never heard anything of the freedom of speech.
this game is a total ripoff.its not only buggy as hell, its also pretty ugly.
the worst thing about it tho is that you have to make qte´s for every goddamn thing you want to do -
Oct 20, 2013Game is really awful, bugged as hell, gameplay is broken and unbalanced like drunken cat in a paper-bag so it can win potential "Worst game of the year" award. I can give it only 0 of 10.
-
Oct 20, 2013You got to be kidding me. This thing is SO bad it.....does not even deserve a review. The sheer fact that this game alone. Ruined over about 20 people's day because the debs thought they can bypass video laws by copyright. Well,guess who's coming over to on your doorstep you little ****
*grabs shotgun and busts the doors open* -
Oct 20, 2013If computers could eat video games, and excrete them when digested: then this game would be what came out after a computer ate it: excreted it, then ingested it again: and vomited. Not to mention the developers flagrant, underhanded attacks on freedom of speech. Shame
-
Oct 20, 2013
-
Oct 20, 2013This game is complete crap. It's buggy as hell. The graphics are shoddy and the fps rate is absolutely atrocious. I really can't think of any redeeming qualities about this game. If I were you I'd spend my money elsewhere.
-
Oct 20, 2013This game is a piece of hot steaming poo. Almost as much as the head game developer. The AI sucks, this was clearly an attempted to milk a content dry genre with a crappy tittle.
-
Oct 20, 2013This game is inexcusably buggy and barely runs. The CEO of this company is a sociopathic piece of that is trying to silence anyone who speaks a unkind word against his game. This company will NEVER see a dollar of my money.
-
Oct 20, 2013Day One Garry's Incident is the WORST game in this year It's full of bugs glitiches and full of TRULY AWFUL Animations Eventho they had the right idea they did it wrong This game is a one big bug and therefore in any circumstances it SHOULD NOT be on Steam platform
-
Oct 20, 2013
-
Oct 20, 2013
-
Oct 20, 2013Dont buy game... Not worth even if its given for free.. waste of wasting your space of hard disk...
The game is horrible to the point you might want to pull your hair out and run away. -
Oct 20, 2013This is a disaster of a game. Unfortunately poor graphics and buggy gameplay are the least of it's sins. The developer of this garbage has actively engaged in falsifying positive reviews and lashing out at critical reviews with copyright infringement claims. Avoid at all costs!
-
Oct 20, 2013
-
Oct 20, 2013This game was pretty all around terrible and buggy beyond belief. Nothing redeeming at all, just a steaming pile...
Don't buy it i wouldn't waste the money!
-
PC PowerPlayNov 25, 2013No element of Day One appears stable, polished or functional. Avoid the big green "Add to Cart" button lest you suffer an incident of your own. [December 2013, p.82]