User Score
3.8

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 182 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 182

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Sep 19, 2020
    1
    The 7 Wonders of Crysis Remastered

    Episode 1: "Hell of an Optimization" It was known as the Crysis, short of a crying systems. Like the Turok 2 on N64 it ran like. It attacked our hardware, but we fought back, even thought we'd won. We lied to ourselves about a lot of things. That's why they developed Crysis Remastered. Though they've never told us if it was supposed to keep the
    The 7 Wonders of Crysis Remastered

    Episode 1: "Hell of an Optimization"

    It was known as the Crysis, short of a crying systems. Like the Turok 2 on N64 it ran like. It attacked our hardware, but we fought back, even thought we'd won. We lied to ourselves about a lot of things. That's why they developed Crysis Remastered. Though they've never told us if it was supposed to keep the nightmares in our GPU's or not, it didn't take long for the remaster to reclaim what was stolen from original. We think unused system resources are ours, the truth is - we just keeping it warm for the next Crytek creation.

    Heh, welcome to the new game, same as the old game.

    Episode 2: "The Stunt"

    No matter what man tells himself, in his heart resides the spirit of the fraud. He can build game engines or erect monuments to his greatness, but, at its core, he cannot escape his own nature. The method of false promises and paid reviews is beautiful in its simplicity. Is that coincidence that every culture on earth invented it independent of one another? Or is it something else? Something primal that allowed us to manifest it. Of course the trick about cheating is making sure you're the cheater and not the cheated.

    Are you the cheater or the cheated? I know for damn sure which one I am.

    Episode 3: "The Flaws and Defect"

    They used to call it stunning looking game, real center of cutting edge technological power, it still is I suppose. Saber Interactive corporation, grimmest company in the world, turned Crysis into its own personal playground. And somewhere here is the result of all their sinister power. But power means different things to different people. There's the power to take life of loved franchises, the power to make a difference, but real power, REAL power is understanding just two things: flaws and defect.

    I'm ready.

    Episode 4: "No More Fear, Maximum Saturation is Here"

    The saturation slider moves right 100% in a second. Created to fool the players, and fool 'em hard. The combination of 2000 years of human artistry and know-how, it has no agenda but the one it's been given. It knows only one purpose, only one end.

    It's the most unadulterated form of expression. And right now, devs have got a lot to say.

    Episode 5: "The Perfect Ascension"

    Error: Missing input parameter 'text'

    Final Episode: "End of Rays"

    To summarize all the bs above: game performs worse than original, looks worse (even with RT and other tech), lacks one big level from original (!), costs more and honestly it's nothing more than an attempt at making easy money.
    Slightly better than WC3: Refunded.
    Expand
  2. Feb 17, 2021
    4
    I have a pretty good pc, and the game wasn't running that good, even tho it's a remaster of an old as hell game. Reading the other users review I understand. That took points away from the game. I actually had a pretty good time with it (after downgradind some of the visuals), was about to give it a 7, but now i've found out it wasnt my hardware problem i had to sunk it's grade to the redI have a pretty good pc, and the game wasn't running that good, even tho it's a remaster of an old as hell game. Reading the other users review I understand. That took points away from the game. I actually had a pretty good time with it (after downgradind some of the visuals), was about to give it a 7, but now i've found out it wasnt my hardware problem i had to sunk it's grade to the red zone.
    the story is kinda all over the place, but the ending is kinda cool, on the other hand, the acting is so terrible, i couldnt believe this game is actually after games like MGS3, for example.
    Well, as I have illegally downloaded it, it was not that terrible, but if i had paid anything on it i'd be just as pissed as everyone else in the comments
    Expand
  3. May 24, 2021
    0
    The only good thing about this remaster is that the performance is better, the devs got very lazy and used the xbox 360 version instead of the original PC version, so because of this the game doesn't look any better than the original, it just looks different. The game is very buggy and bugs are not even being fixed. Bumping up the saturation and then adding rtx features is not how aThe only good thing about this remaster is that the performance is better, the devs got very lazy and used the xbox 360 version instead of the original PC version, so because of this the game doesn't look any better than the original, it just looks different. The game is very buggy and bugs are not even being fixed. Bumping up the saturation and then adding rtx features is not how a remaster should be made. You are better off playing the original with mods. Multiplayer is completely removed from this game. Expand
  4. Sep 23, 2020
    0
    No CPU core changes and it's based on PS3 & Xbox 360 version. That means that this is game uses only one thread and modern PC's can't run the game like it should. Don't buy this really bad "remastered" version.
  5. Sep 21, 2020
    0
    Why did you remove the option to save manually?
    Why is the Ascension level gone?
    Why are the textures on the vegetation worse than the original game, even on the highest "Can It Run Crysis" settings? Why can't I Alt-Tab out of the game? Why is the performance all over the place at medium-high settings? (I have a GTX 1070 Ti and an i7-8700k, so this shouldn't even be a problem). Why
    Why did you remove the option to save manually?
    Why is the Ascension level gone?
    Why are the textures on the vegetation worse than the original game, even on the highest "Can It Run Crysis" settings?
    Why can't I Alt-Tab out of the game?
    Why is the performance all over the place at medium-high settings? (I have a GTX 1070 Ti and an i7-8700k, so this shouldn't even be a problem).
    Why does the "Classic Nanosuit Controls" still feel different compared to the original game?
    Why is there no Sandbox Editor?
    Why does aiming feel awful and not as responsive compared to the original game?
    Why does devmode launch the Crysis soundtrack? (like seriously, it tries to launch the soundtrack like if it were a program and, of course, just spits out an error)
    Why was leaning removed?
    Why was fast crawling removed?

    That is all.
    Expand
  6. Sep 23, 2020
    1
    Runs like **** but the visual don't match up, even on high setting it doesn't really look that amazing, look worst than the original game in some area, sound effect is broken cause you can hear enemy chatter from the other side of the map, control some how feels worst than the original it's extremely unresponsive, and WHY WOULD YOU REMOVE MANUAL SAVING? There's no good reason for that,Runs like **** but the visual don't match up, even on high setting it doesn't really look that amazing, look worst than the original game in some area, sound effect is broken cause you can hear enemy chatter from the other side of the map, control some how feels worst than the original it's extremely unresponsive, and WHY WOULD YOU REMOVE MANUAL SAVING? There's no good reason for that, it's just a dumb decision, you think the remaster would scale better on multicore CPU but it STILL don't, than what the hell is the point for the remaster? Let's not even talk about the Epic exclusivity.

    Overall, EPIC failed on almost every aspect, do not buy unless it's super cheap, what a shame, I was hoping for this game to carry some momentum for a new Crysis game, now it seems unlikely.
    Expand
  7. Sep 21, 2020
    0
    This is an abomination

    -hardware RT not in release day version -all geometry is identical to original with better textures so it still looks like an old game -no vegetation interaction -no lean -no manual save -ascension, whether you liked it or not, is absent -hdr saturation is broken out of the box -even with hdr off, it looks like an oversaturated version of the first game -AI is
    This is an abomination

    -hardware RT not in release day version
    -all geometry is identical to original with better textures so it still looks like an old game
    -no vegetation interaction
    -no lean
    -no manual save
    -ascension, whether you liked it or not, is absent
    -hdr saturation is broken out of the box
    -even with hdr off, it looks like an oversaturated version of the first game
    -AI is garbage because this is the ps3/360 version ported to pc
    -single thread cpu usage even though the ps3/360 version this was based on was multi-threaded
    -default nanosuit controls based on console controls so not dedicated suit modes
    -crash to desktop if you remap controls
    -terrible performance, and don’t say “stop complaining they said it would melt your pc”. No, this game looks far worse than just about any modern game that my 2080Ti can play at 4K/60. There’s no excuse for a 3080 getting 37 fps in this game at 4K highest settings. They couldn’t even be bothered to make the game use more than one cpu core so they clearly spent zero time making this run well. This is the laziest piece of trash remaster I think I’ve ever seen.
    Expand
  8. Sep 21, 2020
    0
    Taking the crysis from PS3 and XBOX 360 limited in shadowing, ray tracing and cpu single threading is absolutely outrageous ! And making us pay 30€ for that CRAP ! My god ... does the industry have moral anymore ? or is it just stupidity and/or incompetence ? i've asked for a refund !
  9. Sep 22, 2020
    3
    One step forward and three steps back. This screams cash grab, I guess Crytek is a bit desperate.
    So many things are downgraded. Lighting while more "advanced" makes many characters and objects look less detailed. The overall look of the game is one of over-saturation and too much contrast. Crysis 2007 looks more grounded with more realistic colors. Some destructive physics are actually
    One step forward and three steps back. This screams cash grab, I guess Crytek is a bit desperate.
    So many things are downgraded. Lighting while more "advanced" makes many characters and objects look less detailed. The overall look of the game is one of over-saturation and too much contrast. Crysis 2007 looks more grounded with more realistic colors. Some destructive physics are actually not as good in Remastered. So many visual downgrades in general, and while yes textures and explosions look better, they're not enough to make Crysis "Remastered" a good buy in 2020. They didn't even fix performance, the game still can't utilize all your CPU cores properly! Raytracing is done via a software solution, therefore it's taxing. The "Can It Run Crysis" Ultra setting is a bad joke. Not even the best PCs can achieve a consistent 4K60 in a 13-year-old game. This isn't how you bring back one of the most beloved PC games of all-time. Maybe you shouldn't have used the Xbox 360 code as a base for the remaster too by the way. The memes aren't enough to save this terrible attempt. Do better next time.
    Expand
  10. Sep 21, 2020
    2
    With 2080 super @1080 fps drops to 35 in lot of areas making it unplayable. Really disappointed. My one core is always above 92-95% usage and rest of the 7 are somewhere between 35-40% .I really hope there is some kind of patch to fix this.
  11. Sep 21, 2020
    0
    I was waiting for Crysis remastered aaaaaand... it's a disaster. Zero optimization, over-bright lighting, single threaded. Textures, shadows, whole graphics are worse than Crysis 3. The gap is 7 years! Even on top systems this "game" is lagging as hell. And the funny thing is... Developers are proud that even RTX 3080 can't handle this. This really hilarious - they are actually proud ofI was waiting for Crysis remastered aaaaaand... it's a disaster. Zero optimization, over-bright lighting, single threaded. Textures, shadows, whole graphics are worse than Crysis 3. The gap is 7 years! Even on top systems this "game" is lagging as hell. And the funny thing is... Developers are proud that even RTX 3080 can't handle this. This really hilarious - they are actually proud of that crappy code that isn't optimized at all. Imo, it's even worse than WC3 Reforged. I'll never buy anything from Crytek again. Expand
  12. Sep 20, 2020
    0
    Aside from the textures, draw distance and some interior lighting, everything in this remaster goes from average to completely inferior, less content, weird colors, overbright lighting, very bad performance, single threading issues, no leaning function, no manual saving and the game uses Denuvo.
    The original is on GOG, has more content including one additional level and a decent MP, and
    Aside from the textures, draw distance and some interior lighting, everything in this remaster goes from average to completely inferior, less content, weird colors, overbright lighting, very bad performance, single threading issues, no leaning function, no manual saving and the game uses Denuvo.
    The original is on GOG, has more content including one additional level and a decent MP, and an active modding community, just use some mods to improve the textures and you've got yourself a far better game
    Expand
  13. Sep 19, 2020
    1
    Crysis Remastered is officially the worst remaster in history of gaming:
    Performance is an absolute abomination:
    i9 9900k 5GHz, 1080TI, 2560:1080: 30-60FPS on Very High, no RTX. At some places FPS is terrible no matter what setting you use, 42FPS on "Can it Run Crysis ?" and 50FPS on "Medium" which looks like absolute **** Same thing was in the original, nothing is improved. It takes a
    Crysis Remastered is officially the worst remaster in history of gaming:
    Performance is an absolute abomination:
    i9 9900k 5GHz, 1080TI, 2560:1080: 30-60FPS on Very High, no RTX. At some places FPS is terrible no matter what setting you use, 42FPS on "Can it Run Crysis ?" and 50FPS on "Medium" which looks like absolute **** Same thing was in the original, nothing is improved.
    It takes a real talent to make a slightly modded 14 FREAKING YEARS OLD GAME to run like **** on modern hardware.

    Not enough ? Most of the time it looks WORSELess Natural than original. [Link omitted per site rules]
    - Vegetation physics is way worse
    - AI is way worse
    - No original controls, no grenade quick throw, no lean. New controls are super clunky and unresponsive
    - Can't manually save the game
    - Ascension level is cut from the game
    - Gun sound problems (full auto and single fire have sound of two completely different guns)

    Refunded almost immediately. That **** as the studio that made this just shouldn't exist.
    Expand
  14. Sep 19, 2020
    2
    Очень слабый ремастер с кучей визуальных багов и вырезанным контентом.

    Начнём с того что главная фишка ремастера рейтрейсинг но его действие слабо заметно а если и заметно то оставляет желать лучшего и при этом максимальная его настройка или низкая почти не влияет на качество отражений и освещения но колоссально сказывается на производительности. Производительность это отдельная тема
    Очень слабый ремастер с кучей визуальных багов и вырезанным контентом.

    Начнём с того что главная фишка ремастера рейтрейсинг но его действие слабо заметно а если и заметно то оставляет желать лучшего и при этом максимальная его настройка или низкая почти не влияет на качество отражений и освещения но колоссально сказывается на производительности.

    Производительность это отдельная тема настройки только одних текстур на максимум съедают больше половины FPS игры но при этом сами текстуры не сильно отличаются от текстур в оригинальной игре а местами и умудряются выглядеть хуже.

    И почти полностью заменены звуки игры к сожалению не в лучшую сторону.
    Так же важный момент из игры вырезана миссия Ascension(в ней нужно управлять самолётом MV-24 VTOLs) причина по которой миссия была вырезана не понятна.

    И по поводу управления персонажем.
    Управление больше походит на то что было в Crysis 2 но при этом хуже.
    Прицеливание будто взяли с консоли и очень криво перенесли на мышь, непонятные торможения и ускорения мыши при прицеливании при том что само
    ускорение в настройках отключено.
    А по поводу физики управления в оригинале при разгоне в режиме скорости и быстром переключении на режим силы и последующем прыжке сохранялась инерция что позволяло делать длинные прыжки теперь этого нету а при прыжке просто останавливаешься и прыгаешь с места чу чуть в сторону прыжка.

    И я нашёл еще больше отличий от оригинала но всё расписывать не стану и играть в ремастер не советую.
    Expand
  15. Sep 19, 2020
    0
    Crytek had more than 10 years to fix performance issues and they didn't, apart from the fact that the game looks worse than the original with degraded animations and vegetation physics.
  16. Sep 22, 2020
    0
    Remaster based on console port, looks worse and run worse than original game.
  17. Sep 19, 2020
    5
    Kinda like the original game more. Some of the visuals are definitely better, but I wouldn't call it "crysis remastered", it's more like some kind enb for the original game. It has performance issues and visual glitches. Maybe it's just me, but I expected more than that. Wouldn't recommend buying the remastered version, but would recommend buying the original one, it's still good.
  18. Sep 19, 2020
    0
    Schlechter Konsolenport. Die Grafik sieht bis auf wenige Ausnahmen schlimmer aus als bei dem 13 (!) Jahre alten Original, es fehlen Inhalte und Features und die Performance ist eine Beleidigung bedenkt man das alter! Kauft es euch bitte nicht sondern spielt das Original von 2007!
  19. Sep 21, 2020
    0
    Remastering the game and basing it off the inferior console port rather than the original version is where they went wrong. Really bizarre way to go about doing it.
  20. Sep 21, 2020
    3
    Wow, what a trainwreck. I just sat there with sub 40 fps and my metrics on and the game was maxing out two cpu cores, the rest were barely used, and my GPU was at 60%. I see only three possible explanations for this. 1, they didn't care about the PC version and their reassurences that all their efforts went there were lies. 2, they purposefully made the game run like crap for the memes. 3,Wow, what a trainwreck. I just sat there with sub 40 fps and my metrics on and the game was maxing out two cpu cores, the rest were barely used, and my GPU was at 60%. I see only three possible explanations for this. 1, they didn't care about the PC version and their reassurences that all their efforts went there were lies. 2, they purposefully made the game run like crap for the memes. 3, they are incompetent. I don't know which explanation is correct, but none of them are good. Refunded, because I don't see the point in owning this. Expand
  21. Sep 26, 2020
    0
    Crysis Remastered might be the worst remaster in the history of gaming. A piece of non-optimized sh*t.
  22. Sep 20, 2020
    0
    I got this game as a free bonus to my latest buy from ASUS. I never played an older version of this game and expected an up to date, good looking and lag free shooter.
    I have an RTX 2060 OC and could play nearly every modern game with 4k and at least medium settings without lags.
    In Crysis I lowered the settings nearly to minimum and still getting lags. And even with high settings the
    I got this game as a free bonus to my latest buy from ASUS. I never played an older version of this game and expected an up to date, good looking and lag free shooter.
    I have an RTX 2060 OC and could play nearly every modern game with 4k and at least medium settings without lags.
    In Crysis I lowered the settings nearly to minimum and still getting lags.
    And even with high settings the game is not looking good or nearly up to date. It looks old fashioned and only slightly polished.
    The plot so far is also not very good and very predictable. There better low budged games than this.
    Expand
  23. Sep 21, 2020
    0
    Lean is gone, suit mechanics are copied from crysis 2 and 3 so armor mode is never default as it consumes energy. The physics are worse. It's a console port of crysis 1 with newer textures. Lacking levels, multiplayer and better AI that was existing in the original title.
    Sure the textures are better, but walking through plants in the original and seeing the leaves move is one of a kind.
    Lean is gone, suit mechanics are copied from crysis 2 and 3 so armor mode is never default as it consumes energy. The physics are worse. It's a console port of crysis 1 with newer textures. Lacking levels, multiplayer and better AI that was existing in the original title.
    Sure the textures are better, but walking through plants in the original and seeing the leaves move is one of a kind. Crysis 3 still looks a lot better than this.
    Not the remaster the amazing original deserved.
    Oh and denuvu and only available on epic game store
    Expand
  24. Sep 22, 2020
    0
    It was a bad idea to make a remaster based on the xbox360 version, originally on a cut engine for consoles! The base is already **** and modern technologies are stuck into it. It's like poking **** with freshener, but **** doesn't stop being **** it stinks the same way, but now it smells like freshener! The original looks much better against the background of the remaster! It is a pityIt was a bad idea to make a remaster based on the xbox360 version, originally on a cut engine for consoles! The base is already **** and modern technologies are stuck into it. It's like poking **** with freshener, but **** doesn't stop being **** it stinks the same way, but now it smells like freshener! The original looks much better against the background of the remaster! It is a pity that the management of Crytek does not see and does not understand what it is doing! Expand
  25. Sep 21, 2020
    0
    A piece of non-optimized, non-multicore CPU s**t.
    The develpores just add new textures. They didn't removed issues that were in the original game.
  26. kbx
    Sep 23, 2020
    0
    Epic, the most sacred classic, holy of holies to all fans turned into sh...y console port. Original Crysis had high hardware requirements but it was justified by the absolutely next gen graphics. For remastered it is the opposite. It looks way worse. Colors are not natural and oversaturated, contrast is too high, physics and vegetation physics is downgraded. Water and especially waves areEpic, the most sacred classic, holy of holies to all fans turned into sh...y console port. Original Crysis had high hardware requirements but it was justified by the absolutely next gen graphics. For remastered it is the opposite. It looks way worse. Colors are not natural and oversaturated, contrast is too high, physics and vegetation physics is downgraded. Water and especially waves are much better in the original. The is no lean option. One level is cut off. Overall control responsivness is much worse. Some very nice details and effects are cut off (check out DF review). So, to all potential buyers... forget about remaster, check out the orignal one instead to see why so many gamers still love it. You can add some nice mods and even tweak up vegetation and object distance. It will look much better than remaster and will give you better gaming experience. Expand
  27. Sep 20, 2020
    2
    This is indeed a missed opportunity. I have taught myself to always have low expectations for remasters after buying WC3: Reforged, and I am glad that I had not steered away from that way of thinking. There are other reviews posted here that mention the shared frustrations that we have for this game so I am not going to bother mentioning all of them, however I will highlight some andThis is indeed a missed opportunity. I have taught myself to always have low expectations for remasters after buying WC3: Reforged, and I am glad that I had not steered away from that way of thinking. There are other reviews posted here that mention the shared frustrations that we have for this game so I am not going to bother mentioning all of them, however I will highlight some and elaborate.

    - Missing features

    This is to be expected, since according to what I read on other forums, this game is a console port that has been ported back to PC... need I say more? You can't even quick save nor have normal controls. The game feels awkward and clunky and the A.I is much worse.

    - Bad optimisation

    This is inexcusable. After having played this for 2 hours, I quickly went back to the original Crysis to compare and on my current high-end hardware the original ran better. And also, why is this game running on DX11 and not DX12 and/or Vulkan? Surely that would have helped. What we have now are inconsistent frame rates and the occasional black screen when launching the game and even crashes while playing.

    - Overall low effort

    This game in my honest opinion is a low-effort project that was done to just bring the game back into the spotlight so as to make it relevant again and also to generate money with the least amount of work and effort put into it. There is also a big quality mismatch between the remastered models and textures and their original counterparts. This is to be expected from a remaster, but I feel the weapon models at the very least deserved an update. There are also low quality textures here and there that could have been upscaled with modern A.I upscaling software.

    - Summary

    Last words, don't buy the game in its current state. Once the above issues have been resolved the game will definitely be worth the price tag and I will then definitely change my rating here. However I wouldn't hold my breathe if I were you since I don't expect those issues to be addressed.
    Expand
  28. Sep 21, 2020
    0
    First of all, I highly recommend watching Digital Foundry's tech analysis/review of this game. I'll be repeating quite a few of the things they said there. First off, I'm running on a 9700k overclocked at 4.9 ghz, RTX 2070 Super overclocked, DDR4 Ram overclocked at 3000 mhz, and an SSD. The current CPUs on the market are, let's face it, designed for the 8th generation of video games,First of all, I highly recommend watching Digital Foundry's tech analysis/review of this game. I'll be repeating quite a few of the things they said there. First off, I'm running on a 9700k overclocked at 4.9 ghz, RTX 2070 Super overclocked, DDR4 Ram overclocked at 3000 mhz, and an SSD. The current CPUs on the market are, let's face it, designed for the 8th generation of video games, and the RTX 30 cards are being sold by scalpers on eBay for $2000. So in 6 months or so when RTX 30 cards are available without shelling out massive amounts of money to scalpers, and CPUs come out that will be able to surpass the CPUs in the Xbox Series X, this game will run a lot better. And it's true that in less than a year my current PC is going to look like absolute garbage because the 9th generation of video games starts in a few months. However, this doesn't change the fact that the game should be running better on my PC than it currently is.

    Crysis was designed for single core CPUs and instead of increasing the clock speeds of single core CPUs over time like people thought would happen when development on the game began, we went to multicore CPUs running at similar clock speeds. The result of this is that every CPU generation has only slightly increased the frame-rate of Crysis and the game can still drop to less than 40 fps even on a 10900k. However, the stripped down console versions of Crysis were able to take advantage of multiple CPU cores, so EA Games took this version of the game which had a lot of things taken out and a dumbed down A.I., threw a new coat of paint on it, and released the game as a "remaster". So basically some things are better, but other disadvantages are carried over from the console versions.

    While the game isn't as poorly CPU optimized as the original, it's still pretty bad. One of the biggest disadvantages of the original was the draw distance and pop-in--and medium settings on this game is basically the same as the original Crysis. But if you turn the three settings that effect pop-in up to high, even the fastest CPU on the market currently isn't able to maintain a solid 60 fps in even 720p. Yes, the i9 10900k is a CPU from the 8th generation of video games and will be obsolete soon, but the game in it's current state looks bad. On my current build I was able to put these settings on medium and every thing else on max and still maintain 60 fps, and the game did look quite good, but the poor world detail really affected the experience.

    Bizarrely, whereas higher resolutions are mostly handled by the GPU, in Crysis Remastered they are handled by the CPU. I have never heard of this being the case in a game. So basically in most games if your CPU can handle the high frame-rates in lower resolutions, your GPU can use all of it's power to bump up the resolution. In layman's terms, you're not going to get any resolutions higher than 1080p and still be able to maintain 60 fps in Crysis. At least, though, you have tons of unused GPU power to put into the ray-tracing. Strangely, the ray-tracing is software ray-tracing, and doesn't take advantage of RTX cards. So non-RTX gpus and even the consoles can use the ray-tracing. While this is an impressive feat, it's more demanding than normal ray-tracing.

    You know what, though, I could have forgiven the poor optimization, since new hardware will be out soon. What I can't forgive is the gameplay. The problem with old stealth games is the CPUs of the time weren't powerful enough to really handle the A.I. necessary to make them feel like modern stealth games. Metal Gear Solid got around this by basically being a 2D game with a top-down view and these games still hold up pretty well today. However, Crysis's stealth was already showing its age, and that's being generous, and when you add in the comically braindead A.I. of this "remaster", the game is just no longer fun, which is the most important thing of a game. This might lead to an entertaining Video Game Dunkey video, but it doesn't make for an entertaining game. I started the game again, and remembered that trying to kill or knockout all the enemies doesn't work particularly well. The most effective strategy in Crysis is usually to just slowly sneak past enemies in stealth mode since the game is semi-open world, or just run away from enemies in speed mode. I have to say, I re-played Far Cry a few months ago and while the stealth in Far Cry mostly involves exploiting the broken mechanics to kill enemies, at the end of the day it was actually pretty fun, which is more than what I can say for Crysis Remastered.

    EA Games had honestly been doing things right with Command and Conquer Remastered, Burnout Paradise Remastered on the Switch, and heck, even the console versions of Crysis Remastered are impressive achievements. However, Crysis Remastered on PC is the usual garbage we expect from EA.

    Oh, and to add salt to the wound, it's an Epic Games Store exclusive.
    Expand
  29. Sep 29, 2020
    0
    that case when the cost of the denuvo is more than the cost of the remastered Crysis, better buy crysis 2007 and improve it with mods , made refund of this game
  30. Sep 21, 2020
    4
    1080Ti, 8700k and I'm getting only 40 - 50 fps in highly dense areas even with settings turned down. Something is seriously wrong with the optimization of this title. Sad though cause Crysis is such a classic hit.
  31. Sep 20, 2020
    6
    If you were to review Crysis merely on its own merit, the game is as good as it ever was albeit with a performance hit for not much in return. However considering one can buy and play the original game there is absolutely no reason to get Crysis Remastered for PC. In many areas, particularly water and lighting the original Crysis has certain stylistic decisions that make it the visuallyIf you were to review Crysis merely on its own merit, the game is as good as it ever was albeit with a performance hit for not much in return. However considering one can buy and play the original game there is absolutely no reason to get Crysis Remastered for PC. In many areas, particularly water and lighting the original Crysis has certain stylistic decisions that make it the visually superior offering. Overall the graphics were polished and they worked.

    In Crysis Remastered textures are higher resolution (but also different and so don't necessarily look better), draw distance is drastically improved and the detail of models in the distance (such as mountains) is also improved while the game is also overall brighter and higher contrast. Everything metal is also shiny thanks to the ray-tracing trend. However with worse performance across the board the visual improvement is not totally worth it. Add to this the alien models are significantly less detailed and lighting effects simplified it is hard to recommend playing the remaster over the original. In the end the improvements don't make up for the parts that are worse. At the end of the day even Crysis Remastered can't beat Crysis.

    This is another in a slew of recent remasters that serve to make developers and publishers lazy by rehashing old games. Crysis 4 is the game we need, Crysis Remastered it seems is the game we deserve. The more titles like these are re-released for each platform the less we will see of brand new experiences such as Crysis 4.
    Expand
  32. Sep 23, 2020
    0
    Чувствую себя обманутым. Запускаю игру. Пытаюсь найти разницу с оригиналом. А ее как таковой нет!!! на ryzen 3600 RTX 2070 super в не зависимости от настроек графики FPS скачет от 30 до 60. Запускаю оригинал. Картинка точно такая же только FPS выше. На ветер выкинутые деньги.Чувствую себя обманутым. Запускаю игру. Пытаюсь найти разницу с оригиналом. А ее как таковой нет!!! на ryzen 3600 RTX 2070 super в не зависимости от настроек графики FPS скачет от 30 до 60. Запускаю оригинал. Картинка точно такая же только FPS выше. На ветер выкинутые деньги.
  33. Oct 20, 2020
    0
    Please, can anyone explain me what is this? It runs even worse than original edition. Waste of money and time.
  34. Oct 1, 2020
    2
    И это то что мы хотели? Какого хрена нам выкатели этот плохой ремастер:Графон улучшили,молодцы,а оптимизацию что,забыли? Плюс RTX там не настоящий,в Контроле он был больше виден,и ещё бы улучшили шутерную механику,нет,что и в оригинале шутерная механика была говном,что и в этом ремастере,короче не покупайте этот ремастер,берите его в том случие,если там уже всё починили,а так дело неИ это то что мы хотели? Какого хрена нам выкатели этот плохой ремастер:Графон улучшили,молодцы,а оптимизацию что,забыли? Плюс RTX там не настоящий,в Контроле он был больше виден,и ещё бы улучшили шутерную механику,нет,что и в оригинале шутерная механика была говном,что и в этом ремастере,короче не покупайте этот ремастер,берите его в том случие,если там уже всё починили,а так дело не пойдёт Expand
  35. Oct 26, 2020
    1
    Terrible, I think they should be ashamed to release such a pos. Right out of the box I couldn't get it to scale to my 1080p 16:9 standard screen correctly it would not go into fullscreen most of the time and flickered a dozen times when trying to change it. I could not get the gamepad or kbm to work even to adjust game settings, when I pointed to a setting it did not register unless I wentTerrible, I think they should be ashamed to release such a pos. Right out of the box I couldn't get it to scale to my 1080p 16:9 standard screen correctly it would not go into fullscreen most of the time and flickered a dozen times when trying to change it. I could not get the gamepad or kbm to work even to adjust game settings, when I pointed to a setting it did not register unless I went way out of the screen space. When I got it playing it did not render correctly and constant flickering, ghosting making it unplayable and after trying/reinstalling it several times no change. Uninstalled. 980m, i7, latest drivers. I'd happily play the original pc version but the controls and camera are not up to modern standards. 2 and 3 have worked fine for years. Trash. Expand
  36. Sep 24, 2020
    0
    Very very bad fps and crash game
    Remastered (shaders and textured update) very very bad!!!
    (bir türk olarak kendimi dolandırılmış hissettim ayrıca bir oyun geliştiricisi olarak cidden sanki 10 günlük bir remastered gibi izlenim aldım yazık çok yazık)
  37. Sep 24, 2020
    5
    Crysis Remastered is disapointing. It has improved visuals over the original but:

    - It lacks the optimization -such as CPU bottleneck-, - No gameplay improvements -such as gunplay-, - Game has visual glitches and bugs, - Same old menus, no makeup, - A direct port from Xbox360 version. - Misses some of the features like manual save and nano suit shortcuts, removed chapter etc.
    Crysis Remastered is disapointing. It has improved visuals over the original but:

    - It lacks the optimization -such as CPU bottleneck-,
    - No gameplay improvements -such as gunplay-,
    - Game has visual glitches and bugs,
    - Same old menus, no makeup,
    - A direct port from Xbox360 version.
    - Misses some of the features like manual save and nano suit shortcuts, removed chapter etc.

    Overall game is still fun to play but looks like Crytek couldn't master of this "remaster". Unfortunately it doesn't worth your money and time. If Crytek keeps up like this, they gonna bankrupt in no time...
    Expand
  38. Sep 20, 2020
    8
    Recently there was a lot of modding of the original Crysis. But after playing this I can say the official Remaster is the best. It looks next gen and has technical improvements.

    Pros: Superb lighting and volumetric effects. Subtle improvements to sound design Nanosuit is similar to Crysis 3 which is a relief as the original controls were annoying. Cons: Poorly optimized. Probably
    Recently there was a lot of modding of the original Crysis. But after playing this I can say the official Remaster is the best. It looks next gen and has technical improvements.

    Pros:
    Superb lighting and volumetric effects.
    Subtle improvements to sound design
    Nanosuit is similar to Crysis 3 which is a relief as the original controls were annoying.

    Cons:
    Poorly optimized. Probably due to Denuvo
    Minor bugs here and there.
    Expand
  39. Sep 20, 2020
    10
    Its amazing how so many people complain that they cant run a game that is made to be hard to run. People experienced the same thing when the first Crysis released but instead of complaining and review bombing the game on the internet, they realised that their PCs were simply not powerfull enough to run graphics that were so revolutionar.
    In conclusion, if you want to test how powerfull
    Its amazing how so many people complain that they cant run a game that is made to be hard to run. People experienced the same thing when the first Crysis released but instead of complaining and review bombing the game on the internet, they realised that their PCs were simply not powerfull enough to run graphics that were so revolutionar.
    In conclusion, if you want to test how powerfull your PC is and experience a great story with an amazing gameplay then i totally recommend you Crysis Remastered.

    PS: Im still waiting for Crysis 4
    Expand
  40. Sep 21, 2020
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I really like the game and graphics were as good as the original game , I really suggest you to play it Expand
  41. Hgx
    Sep 21, 2020
    9
    This game has better graphics than the original but it has some of the same animation but the gameplay is still fun
  42. Sep 20, 2020
    8
    Remaster of an amazing game.
    Well I loved Crysis back in 2007, and I so like now the remaster.
    I personally love the new style (other than a lot of people), the new look just looks way better. But I think some updated shooting animations would be great, as they look... well still exactly the same as in 2007. And there has to be a lot of optimization to be done, because not everybody
    Remaster of an amazing game.
    Well I loved Crysis back in 2007, and I so like now the remaster.
    I personally love the new style (other than a lot of people), the new look just looks way better.
    But I think some updated shooting animations would be great, as they look... well still exactly the same as in 2007.
    And there has to be a lot of optimization to be done, because not everybody has a 2080 TI.
    (And don't use "Can it run crysis mode", it just renders kinda halve of the map and brings only little improvements over "very high")
    Expand
  43. Sep 23, 2020
    10
    Cool but old crysis very very cool crysis 2 and crysis 3 very cool but it crysis cool
  44. Sep 20, 2020
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Good game 2007 return,of nostalgia
    GRAET graphics,но местами есть косяки Хорошая робота над звуками,над трасировкай для плейстейшен 4pro
    Expand
  45. Sep 20, 2020
    10
    It looks much brighter and much more advanced than the first game.

    I'm playing at 4K Medium - High settings. And I am satisfied. I hope Crysis 4 will come.
  46. Sep 24, 2020
    10
    Hala beğenmeyenler var gidin lol cs go felan oynayın daha ne bekliyonuz acaba
  47. Oct 22, 2020
    0
    The game's graphics are very colorless soul. Moving and aiming with a gun is ridiculous. The game has difficulty with framing. Too much nonsense is not worth playing
  48. Mar 12, 2021
    5
    BRONZ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
  49. Jun 3, 2021
    0
    The original game had better graphics. Absolutely awful. I wish i could let the developers know how **** disappointed i am in them.
  50. Oct 31, 2020
    3
    Lol, they put Denuvo on THIS?

    It runs like sh*t, they haven't updated it to run on multicore CPUs, and it looks worse in ways that matter, and better in ways that don't. Like, yeah, I can see a tree on a mountain a kilometer away, but the foreground looks low poly and washed-out like someone put a fuzzy filter on the original game and then accidentally knocked the contrast slider a
    Lol, they put Denuvo on THIS?

    It runs like sh*t, they haven't updated it to run on multicore CPUs, and it looks worse in ways that matter, and better in ways that don't. Like, yeah, I can see a tree on a mountain a kilometer away, but the foreground looks low poly and washed-out like someone put a fuzzy filter on the original game and then accidentally knocked the contrast slider a little to the left and no-one really cared enough to notice.

    It's a port of a console version with slightly better LOD. That tells you everything you need to know. And the fact that they put the game-breaking, crackable DRM Denuvo on it tells you that they were worried about piracy for a reason. Because it ain't worth buying.
    Expand
  51. Nov 17, 2020
    0
    It doesn't look good and runs like sh*t. Seriously, no reason to waste time or money here, just play the original version, which is pretty much the same. Also, Epic exclusivity sucks.
  52. Dec 31, 2022
    5
    Cons:

    * Game crashed a little for me initially early on in the game, but the crashing stopped shortly thereafter which was kinda strange. * They modified the way cloak mode works with the energy system which I wasn't a fan of - greatly preferred the way the original version handled that - it's basically like Crysis 2 and 3 now so the cloak doesn't engage quite as smoothly as it did in
    Cons:

    * Game crashed a little for me initially early on in the game, but the crashing stopped shortly thereafter which was kinda strange.
    * They modified the way cloak mode works with the energy system which I wasn't a fan of - greatly preferred the way the original version handled that - it's basically like Crysis 2 and 3 now so the cloak doesn't engage quite as smoothly as it did in original Crysis 1. Game is also missing the "cloak engaged" and other suit mode sounds which are classic Crysis.
    * The developer decided to take the Epic Games Store bribe and sell out the freedom of their customers for a year to buy the game where they want - for me this translates into never buying the game at all, and playing it somewhere else. Sad considering I own a DVD copy of the original Crysis from 2007, and I also have the Steam digital copy of Crysis & Crysis Warhead...I would have been happy to support the development studio for this game had it released on Steam initially, but I simply don't reward developers for selling me out to awful companies like Epic. If you guys ever do a Crysis Warhead remaster or future games in the franchise, release on all store fronts at the same time without Epic Online Services or any exclusives and I'll give you another chance to earn access to my wallet. I enjoy supporting developers when they exhibit pro-consumer behavior...when they don't, I don't pay for the product. Period.
    * The carrier level toward the end, when you engage the warship on the flight deck, the effective fire area seems to be far larger than it should be - I was standing in areas where there was no fire and still taking damage - this makes it very tough to survive the initial run from where the warship impacts the carrier deck as you'll take constant damage from the fire area that doesn't exist while the alien warship is also shooting at you - eventually if you keep running away, you'll finally clear the area you're taking damage, but it's just kind of up to luck on whether you survive or not.
    * This item isn't specific to Crysis 1, but they have said they don't plan on Remastering Crysis Warhead which I think is a HUGE mistake - Warhead was awesome, and I consider both Crysis 1 & Warhead to be basically two parts of the same story - usually when Nomad and Psycho split off from each other, I go back and forth playing one level at a time from each game to make the story flow more properly since they are going on at the same time for each character, and it would be really nice to have Warhead Remastered - if you read this Crytek, Remaster Crysis Warhead, and RELEASE IT ON STEAM AT LAUNCH - NO EPIC EXCLUSIVITY. I will be happy to buy it if you do this.

    Pros:

    * Excellent graphics upgrades, the game really does look and play fantastic.
    * The game runs MUCH more smoothly than it did before. Granted I have an RTX 3090 at present, but the game runs with everything, including RT set to "Very High" in 4k resolution and is butter smooth @ 60fps, so I do applaud their efforts there, as the original was pretty darn choppy at times even on a really good rig.
    * Game is also now multi-threaded with regard to CPU usage, which takes care of a LOT of the choppiness issues that were present in the original version of the game - kudos there as well.
    * Armor mode is actually useful now and absorbs damage more akin to Crysis 2 & 3.

    Final Rating: 5 / 10 - I can't give it a recommended rating after the way the developer treated gamers with the Epic exclusivity, but as far as remasters go, this one was pretty darn good. Now that I have an HDR monitor as well, I will admit I enjoy playing remasters where Raytracing is enabled along with HDR - these things really add a lot to the atmosphere of a game.
    Expand
  53. Feb 24, 2023
    3
    Unfortunately this game is horrible AI is overpowered to the point where the game isn't even fun to play anymore.
  54. Mar 10, 2022
    2
    Bagovi na bagovima a onda jos bagova na jos tih bagova i onda jos dodatno malo su dodali bagova... nije igrica mogla da mi se loaduje sve mi otislo u pm tako da nikad vise.
  55. May 12, 2021
    4
    terrible performance and even not really good graphics the game feels too old (which it actually is) but even for a remaster it's terrible I'm not sure if I can keep playing it
  56. Oct 26, 2020
    0
    I think the reason Crysis is so well talked about is because of the graphics. By todays standards, even the "remastered" version set to "Can It Run Crysis?" looks terrible compared to more modern AAA titles. Crysis may have looked great when it first dropped back in 2007 (if you had the rig to run it) but today it's not only a joke in terms of physics and realism (broken raytracing, blurryI think the reason Crysis is so well talked about is because of the graphics. By todays standards, even the "remastered" version set to "Can It Run Crysis?" looks terrible compared to more modern AAA titles. Crysis may have looked great when it first dropped back in 2007 (if you had the rig to run it) but today it's not only a joke in terms of physics and realism (broken raytracing, blurry visuals, see other complaints submitted) but it's also a joke in terms of gameplay. Thirteen years ago this may have been a slightly decent game if they spent more time on gameplay mechanics instead of graphics, but unfortunately they decided on the latter. Gameplay is so bland, boring and generic that I would rather play Steam Early Access indie dev shooters.

    GAMEPLAY:

    Movement is slow, slogging and terribly implemented. The basic movement seems like a slow jog. Sprinting sends you forward so fast that your energy bar depletes in what seems like a second. Continuing to sprint makes a normal run but you will have zero suit energy. SO STUPID! Why not make suit sprint a toggled power?

    The game doesn't know whether to be a stealth shooter or a run-and-gun shooter as it constantly advises you to switch between stealth and armor modes as well as using binoculars that are pretty much useless and only highlight enemies on the minimap but not on a HUD. Stealth is nearly as pointless as the energy drains the faster you move and is instantly over the moment you fire a weapon or make any major action. Crouching and going prone causes it to drain slower, but because of the various large grasses, bushes and other foliage it makes finding your way nearly impossible. Going prone itself is so slow you'd wonder how your character even qualified to wear the suit let alone join a military branch to begin with.

    Once you're spotted by AI enemies (which is VERY easy even if you're crouched or prone) every enemy nearby INSTANTLY knows where you are and has pretty decent accuracy even on the easier modes that were tested. What's worse, is they're wearing basic fatigues while you're in an advanced alien war suit yet you will die VERY quickly, especially if you suddenly get caught while in stealth and your energy isn't high enough to absorb much damage in armor mode. Meanwhile, some enemies require half a clip of ammo to just take down 1 enemy, sometimes even if your shot is a dead on headshot on the first trigger pull.

    GRAPHICS:

    Again, some people need to take their nostalgia goggles off and actually see the game, both the original and Remaster, for what they are. It may have been the "ultimate" showcase of graphics 13 years ago but there are much better, more realistic options today than Crysis could have hoped for. I mean seriously...the foliage doesn't even move in the game! Zero collision detection, one bullet can sometimes cause whole trees to split as if it was chopped by a massive axe, physics of objects are as generic as can be... It's just a mess of bad decisions and lack of innovation as if the dev's only concern was to make a game so graphically unoptimized that even if you had a PC that could run Crysis in 2007 it was sure to run it very poorly. Honestly, Red Dead Redemption 2 on PC is probably the new standard as I can play Crysis on max settings 4K and get between 60-70 fps in the Remastered version and in a modded original version (you'd think the devs would have implemented more modern graphics and coding techniques as an update to the original or even the Remastered version, but NOPE!). Meanwhile on RDR2, max settings and 4K brings the game to a painful 23-30fps (30 fps if absolutely nothing is happening and I stand still) but the game is crisp, clear, very clean looking and has natural looking scenery and interactive foliage and modern day physics.

    Crysis Remastered reminds me of Halo in terms of how people praise and remember those games as being the "holy grail" of PC gaming. When going back to them compared to modern day games, they are utter trash that has been overhyped for years without anyone returning to see how bad both games were in terms of graphics, story and gameplay mechanics.
    Expand
  57. Jan 26, 2021
    2
    Too many bugs. I can't count the number of times I get stuck on a level and had to restart from a checkpoint. Especially after using a machine gun. Too much clipping. Didn't enjoy the game at all.
  58. Sep 17, 2021
    1
    Optimisation is terrible, even on my 3080 it has fps drops due to it only using 40-60% of the GPU
  59. Jan 4, 2022
    8
    Remaster mais um menos. Joguei pelo gamepass.
    Todos os crysis são otimos.
  60. Oct 21, 2021
    10
    neden bu kadar düşük olduğunu anlamadım gerçekten efsaneydi özellikle uzay yaratığı bölümleri ve vuruş hissi kötü
  61. Mar 20, 2021
    0
    Fast cash-grab scam. There is almost no improve on graphics, optimization changes and doesnt even include Crysis Warhead.
    This is just wrong and dont justified a new purchase. The company is fkng with fans of the first game.
  62. Sep 29, 2020
    3
    Impressive tech demo for Raytracing, awful everything else. Still locked to single core CPU usage and in places looks worse than the original. This game should not have been made, it was a half ass attempt.
  63. Sep 2, 2021
    0
    Poorly optimized reskin. Epic exclusive makes it even more toxic. Really need to assign this a negative score.
  64. Oct 14, 2021
    0
    Установил её себе в ориджине по подписке ориджинплей, моя сборка пк состоит на 3060ti и рязань 3600x, фпс прыгает в 2к от 70 до 15, за час игры 1 раз игра вылетела, 1 локация ПОЛНОСТЬЮ НЕ ПРОРИСОВЫВАЛАСЬ! т.е. тупо всё черное было и прорисованы ток шкафы и ящики были, але крайтек, как дела?Установил её себе в ориджине по подписке ориджинплей, моя сборка пк состоит на 3060ti и рязань 3600x, фпс прыгает в 2к от 70 до 15, за час игры 1 раз игра вылетела, 1 локация ПОЛНОСТЬЮ НЕ ПРОРИСОВЫВАЛАСЬ! т.е. тупо всё черное было и прорисованы ток шкафы и ящики были, але крайтек, как дела?
  65. Dec 16, 2020
    5
    Rtx 2070 r5 3600x 16gb ram ful hd 1080 medium-high settings , average between 30 and 40 fps .
    Sometimes there are lags and drawdowns 10/20 fps .
    Seriously Crytec ?
  66. Feb 15, 2021
    9
    As of the 2nd PC Update (2.0)
    So far, the improved particle physics and textures is a huge plus for me, however, there are a few problems with the game itself (which will be fixed as the weekly patches come by), such as the AI being a bit glitchy with mounted weapons at times, the classic Nanosuit mode (although it's starting to get very close to the original) missing a few sound effects
    As of the 2nd PC Update (2.0)
    So far, the improved particle physics and textures is a huge plus for me, however, there are a few problems with the game itself (which will be fixed as the weekly patches come by), such as the AI being a bit glitchy with mounted weapons at times, the classic Nanosuit mode (although it's starting to get very close to the original) missing a few sound effects from the activation of each mode, but overall from the communication done through the Discord community, Crytek is determined to fix those bugs and glitches, where hopefully this would get a better reaction from the audience.
    Ascension has been added back, quite literally a list of bugs and fixes have been established, and I can say for sure that the updates going through are huge for the game, and that's what makes me want to give this a very positive review! I know this game is going to be fixed to its proper state, it's just a matter of time where hopefully update 3.0 will fix almost all of the leftover bugs, and the introduction of new features such as DLSS 2.0.
    Expand
  67. Nov 2, 2020
    0
    Absolutely criminal! The game doesn't even launch properly, it launches on half of the screen! (Guess 1080p is too much asking for this TRASH, let alone 1440p or 4k!)
    The game sets the settings on low on a GTX 1060 6gb and i7 6700. It looks like **** crap. If I put it on "Can it run Crysis?" settings, I get 20 fps and still looks like **** If I deactivate the "Ray-Tracing" (wtf is that,
    Absolutely criminal! The game doesn't even launch properly, it launches on half of the screen! (Guess 1080p is too much asking for this TRASH, let alone 1440p or 4k!)
    The game sets the settings on low on a GTX 1060 6gb and i7 6700. It looks like **** crap. If I put it on "Can it run Crysis?" settings, I get 20 fps and still looks like **** If I deactivate the "Ray-Tracing" (wtf is that, the game runs on DX11, there is NO Ray-Tracing on DX11!!!!), I get 60fps but with terrible 1% lows below 20 frames, unplayable!!!
    I can **** run Serious Sam 4, a game known for bad optimisation on **** ultra settings with DX12 API and it runs buttery smooth in comparison to this MESS!
    Did I mentioned that the best level in Crysis is GONE!?
    Checkpoints only
    You can't throw grenades quickly anymore, equip and THEN throw!
    You can't pilot helicopters or the VTOL anymore
    NO more profiles
    The UI is not fit on the enitre screen, feels like a **** CONSOLE!
    Even with V-sync off, the game has a TERRIBLE mouse lag!
    So much more stupid **** but I am TIRED OF IT!!!

    Is this how I remember crysis, back in 2007, when I was only 5 yo!?
    I'd rather play the original again on that piece of junk of the pc, rotating the cooler with a screwdriver in order to start, 10fps lowest settings!

    and **** DENUVO!!!!
    Expand
  68. Oct 26, 2020
    4
    Crysis remastered brings Crysis (2007) to the next-generation.

    Pros: - Greater looking textures - Greater draw distance - Greater effects such as lighting. - Ray tracing support Neutral: - No Multiplayer Cons: - Bugs - The animations were not improved - The AI feels dumber in the remaster - Sometimes the 2007 Crysis looks better - Performance Issues - Dumbed down
    Crysis remastered brings Crysis (2007) to the next-generation.

    Pros:
    - Greater looking textures
    - Greater draw distance
    - Greater effects such as lighting.
    - Ray tracing support

    Neutral:
    - No Multiplayer

    Cons:
    - Bugs
    - The animations were not improved
    - The AI feels dumber in the remaster
    - Sometimes the 2007 Crysis looks better
    - Performance Issues
    - Dumbed down controls
    - Unresponsive controls (When you press the jump button, it actually takes 1-2 seconds for Nomad to jump)

    I'd say just skip this remaster, It's Crysis for sure, but it's not the one everyone loves and I can say that the 2007 Crysis still looks absolutely stunning and plays better even to this day.
    Expand
  69. May 23, 2021
    7
    -Graphics improvements are not bad, but there are optimization issues.
    -Nano Garment controls are messed up. The controls have been removed and a different, difficult to get used system has been replaced.
    -There are still minor graphic glitches. It does not appear constantly, but what happens is disturbing. -Some controls have been removed. In the past, we could temporarily bend by
    -Graphics improvements are not bad, but there are optimization issues.
    -Nano Garment controls are messed up. The controls have been removed and a different, difficult to get used system has been replaced.
    -There are still minor graphic glitches. It does not appear constantly, but what happens is disturbing.
    -Some controls have been removed. In the past, we could temporarily bend by pressing CTRL. The setup menu does not work dynamically. The settings I set do not remain the same.
    Expand
  70. Aug 18, 2023
    1
    absolute dogsh** Remaster, and also the performance, even a 4090 struggles to get 60 fps in 4k. crytek is only a shadow of itself
  71. Jan 19, 2021
    0
    Still epic exclusive, yeah you **** up. Enough time has passed, let's release it on steam
  72. Feb 12, 2021
    2
    More like demaster... you know something’s gone wrong with your remaster when it falls short of the original game with community mods. It’s literally missing features that made the original so groundbreaking. The only impressive feature of this at all is sparse voxel global illumination, and even then RTGI via reshade can achieve results that aren’t too far off in most scenes. PatheticMore like demaster... you know something’s gone wrong with your remaster when it falls short of the original game with community mods. It’s literally missing features that made the original so groundbreaking. The only impressive feature of this at all is sparse voxel global illumination, and even then RTGI via reshade can achieve results that aren’t too far off in most scenes. Pathetic cash grab. Expand
  73. Oct 14, 2021
    6
    My gaming rig has an i9-9900K and an RTX 3090 and my monitor is 1440p 240 Hz. If you adjust some settings the game can run above 180 fps with high textures but there are fps drops on certain areas due to poor optimisation. Also the game is very short so it’s only recommended if you find it below half price.
  74. May 19, 2022
    2
    Оптимизация ужасная. Графика такая себе. Геймплей старый, сложный и однообразный. Не ремастер, а дичь какая-то.
  75. Aug 18, 2023
    2
    Я терпел, когда мой более менее мощный компутер потянул игру на высоких настройках графики в 30-60 фпс. Я терпел клишированных героев игры, и клишированные сюжетные моменты. Я терпел звуковые баги и глупых НПС. Но когда в финале игры из за критического бага финальный босс просто не прогрузился, я сгорел нахуй.Я терпел, когда мой более менее мощный компутер потянул игру на высоких настройках графики в 30-60 фпс. Я терпел клишированных героев игры, и клишированные сюжетные моменты. Я терпел звуковые баги и глупых НПС. Но когда в финале игры из за критического бага финальный босс просто не прогрузился, я сгорел нахуй.
Metascore
69

Mixed or average reviews - based on 22 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 22
  2. Negative: 0 out of 22
  1. Oct 12, 2021
    70
    Crysis Remastered is a good bit of nostalgia that can appeal to players who want to reminisce about the early days of the Xbox 360 and PS3. Those that are looking for a fun and quick shooter game will also find a lot of enjoyment from Crysis Remastered, but don’t expect the reinvention of the wheel because Crysis invented the wheel in the first place.
  2. Mar 10, 2021
    60
    You have to be willing to forgive quite a bit to enjoy Crysis Remastered. Questionable enemy AI is bad enough, but a reduction in content is baffling, and the effort feels incomplete because of it. The extra lighting is nice, but the spotty performance is the real sore spot, as it ensures that a polished and well-performing version of the game is simply unattainable. Unless you have issues trying to run the original on your system or absolutely need controller support, you're probably better off skipping this until a better, proper remaster comes along.
  3. CD-Action
    Dec 18, 2020
    60
    For its age, Crysis is still quite fun, but I don’t think bragging about the game’s ability to vanquish any PC should still be a thing today. There are many shooters that look much better and at the same time run much smoother on the same hardware. It’s also a pity that the Warhead expansion was not remastered along the base game and there’s no trace of the multiplayer modes. [12/2020, p.56]