Crysis 3

 PC
User Score
6.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1579 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 743 out of 1579
  2. Mixed: 563 out of 1579
  3. Negative: 273 out of 1579
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Esthete
    Mar 19, 2019
    7
    Crysis 3 doesn't pull on the full-fledged part, although it is done well, but it is too short, as a dlc it would be great for Crysis 2. And yeah It would be nice if Crytek remembered their only franchise.
  2. HonestlyTrue
    Feb 27, 2013
    5
    You could see it in Crysis 1, a game was made for PC hardware that included mouse and keyboard control. Crysis 2 and 3 are Consoleproducts, you feel it in the gameplay. Crysis 2 and 3 is a product of Crytek bending over for the consolemarket, casualizing gameplay.

    The games good thing is good graphics, that's it, the mix of jungle and city looks amazing. But the gameplay is    You could see it in Crysis 1, a game was made for PC hardware that included mouse and keyboard control. Crysis 2 and 3 are Consoleproducts, you feel it in the gameplay. Crysis 2 and 3 is a product of Crytek bending over for the consolemarket, casualizing gameplay.

    The games good thing is good graphics, that's it, the mix of jungle and city looks amazing.

    But the gameplay is streamlined, made easier so controllerplayers can keep up. As PC Purist this is just horrible, you feel it when you play that Crysis 3 was made with consoles in mind, at least they brought back the speedmode again, so gameplay has at least a little bit more momentum.

    AI is plain horrible, cloak completely destroys the AI. I could rush through the game with cloak abuse and turn the game into a walk in the park, it's ridiculous.

    Multiplayer is just Call of Duty with Nano Suit nothing special.

    If this is what next gen games look like, good graphics and nothing else, we are fkn doomed! Whats left is a mediocre shooter which is quite forgetable, personally i think Crytek has lost their touch and will never reahc the glory of Crysis 1 which was created with the one and only platform in mind, the PC.    … Expand
  3. Bryjoered
    Feb 19, 2013
    7
    Hahaha, it's blatantly obvious what "PC gamers" look for in a game nowadays. Yes, this is the best looking game ever made, but I'm sorry it is just another mediocre FPS. Graphics don't make the game, they just enhance it. The game is ok, no I don't have the 680 required to play on max settings, but I do play it on very high. The AI is incredibly stupid, you can simply be in stealth modeHahaha, it's blatantly obvious what "PC gamers" look for in a game nowadays. Yes, this is the best looking game ever made, but I'm sorry it is just another mediocre FPS. Graphics don't make the game, they just enhance it. The game is ok, no I don't have the 680 required to play on max settings, but I do play it on very high. The AI is incredibly stupid, you can simply be in stealth mode the entire game and wreak havok on any enemy you come across. I'm sorry, but the first crysis is still both the most fun and the best game overall out of the series. This one has the "best" multiplayer yet in the crysis universe, but compared to other multiplayer FPS's cmon now, it just simply doesn't compete to something like BF3. It boils down to this, this is a remarkable looking game and truly jaw dropping even on modest settings, but that gameplay is trite and mediocre, which is a shame.… Expand
  4. hemmingjay
    Feb 20, 2013
    5
    A beautiful engine and an experienced FPS design team failed to make a compelling game. It's smooth, pretty and capable but it's utterly devoid of entertainment or innovation. The writing is heavy handed and predictable. The level design is anemic and offers a false sense of freedom. The AI is some of the worst in the industry and probably should/not have been outsourced. Try it out whenA beautiful engine and an experienced FPS design team failed to make a compelling game. It's smooth, pretty and capable but it's utterly devoid of entertainment or innovation. The writing is heavy handed and predictable. The level design is anemic and offers a false sense of freedom. The AI is some of the worst in the industry and probably should/not have been outsourced. Try it out when it goes on sale for $29.99 but skip it for now. The best experience with this game is watching the commercials/trailers.… Expand
  5. killiana1a
    Feb 19, 2013
    5
    Crysis 3 is a 6 hour long tech demo created with the ulterior motive of selling the game engine to other game developers. There is nothing here that has not been done before. Finally, much has been said about the graphics. Lets end the speculation here and now. Crytek is not the prophet ushering in the era of photorealism for video games. So all this hoo ha hoo ha about "graphics" isCrysis 3 is a 6 hour long tech demo created with the ulterior motive of selling the game engine to other game developers. There is nothing here that has not been done before. Finally, much has been said about the graphics. Lets end the speculation here and now. Crytek is not the prophet ushering in the era of photorealism for video games. So all this hoo ha hoo ha about "graphics" is little more than paid viral marketing.… Expand
  6. dumle
    Aug 5, 2013
    6
    Crysis 3 didn't disappoint me but it didn't impress me either. The campaign is decent. It is a lot more linear compared to the first one and it does get a bit cutsceny every now and then. I would also have love to seen more drive-able vehicles in the game. But you know the gameplay is fun enough It hasnt changed all that much since the previous games. You can still abuse the hell out ofCrysis 3 didn't disappoint me but it didn't impress me either. The campaign is decent. It is a lot more linear compared to the first one and it does get a bit cutsceny every now and then. I would also have love to seen more drive-able vehicles in the game. But you know the gameplay is fun enough It hasnt changed all that much since the previous games. You can still abuse the hell out of the cloak system and the AI doesnt really put up any real challenge most of the time. The checkpoint can be a source of annoyance.

    The production values are great and everything sounds and looks awesome. The characters are extremely detailed and nicely voiced. But i didnt really care about the story or any of the characters. You dont really have any reason to care about the world and the sci fi story is pretty damn generic.

    I might sound more negative about the game than i really am. Its not like its a bad game. Everything works as it should and if you are new to the crysis series then you will probably have a lot of fun with the nanosuit.

    But the game didnt have any major impact on me. It didnt make me feel anything when playing it. I recognize that as far a criticism go this is a quite one. But for me this game was quite a forgetful experience.

    Perhaps its the fact that my playstyle basically is me sneaking past everyone. And the sneaking in this game is way overpowered and dull. Not to mention that you can pick off anyone at any time with little to no consequence. The fact that you easily could kill everyone if spotted could be one of those thing that removes the tension of the stealth.

    But hey i have rambled enough. Crysis 3 is an good enough game and if you are looking for a high production valued 6 hours action filled campaign then you could do way worse.    … Expand
  7. plotlesviolence
    Mar 22, 2016
    5
    [OVERVIEW = 5]
    An insult to the legacy of Crysis 1. Not enough ammo is available for an action-FPS, and an overpowered option to kill while invisible ruins the stealth.
    [PRESENTATION = 7] (Graphics = 9) Very pretty, with a ton of foliage, and I really enjoy the sparks flying when bullets miss. Explosions look good. (Visual aesthetics = 6) The entire game is ruined city with overgrown    [OVERVIEW = 5]
    An insult to the legacy of Crysis 1. Not enough ammo is available for an action-FPS, and an overpowered option to kill while invisible ruins the stealth.

    [PRESENTATION = 7]
    (Graphics = 9) Very pretty, with a ton of foliage, and I really enjoy the sparks flying when bullets miss. Explosions look good.
    (Visual aesthetics = 6) The entire game is ruined city with overgrown foliage. Other than the insides of a few buildings and a cave level, there’s precious little variety. I miss the flash-freeze ice and interior alien spaceship from the first game. Also the aliens aren’t very interesting, just messes of triangular shapes. I prefer the human enemies of Crysis 1. The beautiful thermal vision superimposed over silver-grayscaled cold background returns from Crysis 2 for your “heat vision” viewtype, possibly the greatest improvement those games made over Crysis 1.
    (Sound Effects = 7)
    (Voice Acting = 8)
    (Physics = 7) Everything ragdolls and you can throw barrels. Although visually sharper, it’s much more static; I really miss the way trees in Crysis 1 would fall over when you mowed them down with a machine gun.
    (Plot = 6) Cliched, but not horrible and skippable after the first viewing.

    [CONTROLS/MECHANICS = 4]
    (50% Stealth = 1) Stealth options are limited to cloaking, throwing objects for distraction, stealth kills from behind, and bow-and-arrow sniping. The problem is sniping does not break your cloak, so it’s too easy to kill enemies without challenge. To prevent the game from becoming boring, I had to decide not to stealth.
    (50% First-Person Shooter = 5) Movement/aiming are pretty smooth. You don’t have any new suit powers, but this time they are all activated by separate controller buttons rather than a selection wheel. So to super-jump you just hold the jump button longer, super-speed is just sprinting (L3), super-strength is automatic when punching or throwing, and armor and cloak have separate buttons. That works more smoothly than it ever did in Crysis 1, while preserving the balance of each power drawing from the same limited pool of recharging energy. I dislike that grenades are considered a separate weapon to switch to rather than a secondary weapon as in Halo.
    The standard weapons are limited to sniper rifle, shotguns and assault rifles. Unfortunately you can only carry 2 guns, not counting the bow or the C4/rocket launcher. But the big problem is the utter lack of ammunition. Every large area has one ammo cache with about 2 clips per gun and 1-2 rockets, which is insufficient for the more than 10 enemies guarding the area. None of the enemies drop standard ammo because they’re all aliens.
    About ¼ of the aliens drop alien weapons, 1-clip’s worth of alien rifle/shotgun, again, insufficient to kill 4 other aliens. Occasionally you get an alien mortar-grenade-launcher or flamethrower, which are cool, but limited.
    The bow-and-arrow, while overpowered if cloaked, isn’t particularly fun, but you will use it because you quickly run out of everything else. So gameplay amounts to you having your fun with the ammo available, then the arrows, then cloaking and melee-ing the remainder until you find the next ammo cache. This could have been solved by just making the ammo caches provide infinite clips.
    (Physics = 6) You can throw barrels (including explosive) and objects.
    (Friendly AI = none)
    (Enemy AI = 3) It works, and enemies will shoot at you when cloaked if you remain at the last known position, but otherwise you can cloak and snipe your way through levels unmolested.

    [DESIGN = 3]
    (Menus = 6)
    (Level Design = 2) The game is linear, the levels are somewhat open, but you have no real options. In Crysis 1 you could take advantage of verticality by super-jumping up several stories in buildings, or you could punch through walls of a shack, Red Faction-style, to get the drop on enemies. Here everything is static, rarely vertical, and cover does not get destroyed, so at its best the game is mere linear FPS.
    (Difficulty Curve = 6)
    (Upgrade System = 5) As in previous Crysis-es, you can pull up a rifle menu to swap out components (like scopes and grips), which lets you customize guns with any items previous picked up. I particularly like the thermal vision scopes, which save you from having to switch back and forth in your main view. But the game also has a weird unlockable upgrade system I never really bothered with.
    (Modes = Singleplayer campaign (7 hours, 50% padding), Competitive and Cooperative Online Multiplayer) Everything after you run out of ammo is “padding.” The game is old enough at time of writing that online multiplayer is a ghosttown.

    [CONCLUSION]
    Crysis 1 was brilliant, a worthy successor to Deus Ex 1 but without the hacking or conversation options. Crysis 2 was a standard linear FPS with only stealth or shooting options. Crysis 3 is Crysis 2 with the stealth overpowered-ly boring and the shooting fun but arrested every few minutes by low ammo. If cheap, worth maybe one playthrough.    … Expand
  8. 10k_Volts
    Apr 13, 2013
    7
    The gameplay has come a long way from the original Crysis and combined with spectacular graphics does make an enjoyable experience. But the campaign was somewhat short and I found myself doing the exact same approach for every section. It was worth the half-price point I managed to buy it at but I'm not sure it was everything I hoped for if I spent anymore on it.

    The multiplayer was    The gameplay has come a long way from the original Crysis and combined with spectacular graphics does make an enjoyable experience. But the campaign was somewhat short and I found myself doing the exact same approach for every section. It was worth the half-price point I managed to buy it at but I'm not sure it was everything I hoped for if I spent anymore on it.

    The multiplayer was also not bad, although personally I lost interest after a couple of afternoon sessions.    … Expand
  9. happy-argentine
    Apr 20, 2013
    6
    This is without a doubt a beautiful game.

    But when:
    1) the combat bores you
    2) you can one-shot kill all enemies while still on stealth and they won't even notice WTF just happened
    3) Storyline is predictable
    4) Game is short

    ....You know you should have spent your money somewhere else--
  10. NasNhak
    May 25, 2013
    5
    Pros:
    Great graphics yes. Everybody knows.
    Excellent sound and music. But these things are expected nowadays. Good story. Great storytelling. Better weapon attachments. Cons: WAY TOO SHORT! U can get through the whole game cloaked. Stupid AI. Upgrade Armor mode to max and then just keep showing up in front of the CELL soldiers. God they are dumb, even on Post-Human Warrior.    Pros:
    Great graphics yes. Everybody knows.
    Excellent sound and music. But these things are expected nowadays.
    Good story.
    Great storytelling.
    Better weapon attachments.

    Cons:
    WAY TOO SHORT!
    U can get through the whole game cloaked.
    Stupid AI. Upgrade Armor mode to max and then just keep showing up in front of the CELL soldiers. God they are dumb, even on Post-Human Warrior.
    Alpha-Ceph sucks.
    Final boss fight ****
    Did i mention its too short and u can get through the whole game cloaked? Seriously 2 playthroughs took 14 hours.
    More emphasis on multiplayer.
    Feels more like an expansion to Crysis 2 than an original outing.
    Could have atleast changed HUD details. That ALWAYS fells fresh.

    Meh.    … Expand
  11. KingShree
    Jul 25, 2013
    7
    One thing is for sure, this game has the best graphics ever seen in a game up to date. Unfortunately its very different from the very succesful Crysis 1. Very short campaing with dull story, it has an end and conclusion but it feels very fast like you just started the game and its already end. Suit management has been simplified and despite enemy AI is good, when u go to stealth they actOne thing is for sure, this game has the best graphics ever seen in a game up to date. Unfortunately its very different from the very succesful Crysis 1. Very short campaing with dull story, it has an end and conclusion but it feels very fast like you just started the game and its already end. Suit management has been simplified and despite enemy AI is good, when u go to stealth they act very stupidly. Multiplayer doesnt have some of the biggest problems of Crysis 2 but the overall game balance is just bad, there are still tons of bugs and only a die hard fan is able to stay at this game when there are a lot of better MP games out there.… Expand
  12. hongkong_tea
    Aug 7, 2013
    6
    The worst flaw, storytelling. I felt no connection to the character. I played the final boss just to finish the game, short btw.
    Nice graphics (could be even better) but at medium details still looks really nice, great optimization. The guns are also really nice and well implemented, as the game play. The music is absolutely awesome.
    I expected a lot more from Crytec. The original one is    The worst flaw, storytelling. I felt no connection to the character. I played the final boss just to finish the game, short btw.
    Nice graphics (could be even better) but at medium details still looks really nice, great optimization. The guns are also really nice and well implemented, as the game play. The music is absolutely awesome.
    I expected a lot more from Crytec. The original one is really good.    … Expand
  13. maxdh
    Sep 24, 2013
    5
    Why Crysis 3 is a bad FPS? Because it has nothing of the great first chapter; nothing of the good and balanced FPS that Crysis 2 is. Crysis 3 is just a nice painting with beautiful colours but no content: the campaign (played at Soldier difficulty level) lasted 4 hours and 18 minutes, too short to be entertaining; the cut-scenes and all the Psycho-relationship is just boring and forcelyWhy Crysis 3 is a bad FPS? Because it has nothing of the great first chapter; nothing of the good and balanced FPS that Crysis 2 is. Crysis 3 is just a nice painting with beautiful colours but no content: the campaign (played at Soldier difficulty level) lasted 4 hours and 18 minutes, too short to be entertaining; the cut-scenes and all the Psycho-relationship is just boring and forcely stucked in. At the end, Crysis 3 is not enjoyable playing at and not worth event the 9,95 euros it costed me on Origin.… Expand
  14. FreakyFunka
    Feb 25, 2013
    7
    Graphically amazing on max settings.(I am fortunate enough to have built a high end PC.) But if you take a step back in time and look at the direction Crysis 1 was going I do not understand what happened, then you see the EA symbol and realise Crytek have been told to make it more comfortable for the casual gamer. Shame, from great roots and ideas to a graphical tech show to sell theirGraphically amazing on max settings.(I am fortunate enough to have built a high end PC.) But if you take a step back in time and look at the direction Crysis 1 was going I do not understand what happened, then you see the EA symbol and realise Crytek have been told to make it more comfortable for the casual gamer. Shame, from great roots and ideas to a graphical tech show to sell their engine. EA need to learn a new phrase for their gaming INNOVATION, not sequel.… Expand
  15. GildaTheGriffin
    Mar 10, 2013
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I liked this game for the most part, the only think that set me off was the storyline. It takes the most random turns and even the end cutscene has me confused. At the end it shows Prophet on the beach of the island from Crysis 1 and he has his own body made of some nanobots. But the thing was Prophet killed himself in Crysis 2 and the story seems to forget that Prophet was using Alcatraz body to keep him alive in the suit and use him to complete the mission. So having been confused, I do think the game has improved and it had wonderful additions.… Expand
  16. RyanMorgan
    Mar 6, 2013
    7
    Great game, both in terms of graphics and gameplay. The campaign is a bit dry and the A.I isn't all that great. but it is entertaining nonetheless. Multiplayer isn't fantastic either; limited CoD-like game modes, awkward maps and really unbalanced weaponry, but again, it is good fun just to sit back and play.

    I would recommend it, but only if you're going to pay less than £30 for it.
  17. BMF
    Mar 4, 2013
    7
    Good but not great the graphics look excellent when maxed out but aiming and shooting feels off. its like a mix of mouse acceleration and smoothing very much like your pushing a controllers thumb stick with your mouse and when you use scopes with a high zoom it gets even worse. Other then that Crysis 3 is fairly average all around and as such I would recomend waiting for a sale to pick it up.
  18. TankGeorge
    Feb 25, 2013
    7
    This game has a stunning graphic. Jaws will drop several times. The audience behind the player will cry that they do not have a strong computer too. But as always, graphic wow will fade over time and Crysis 3 will be naked.

    This game is the same as Crysis 1 was perhaps little better. You do not play it for fun, fresh and intense shooter experience. Despite the fact, that Crytek wants    This game has a stunning graphic. Jaws will drop several times. The audience behind the player will cry that they do not have a strong computer too. But as always, graphic wow will fade over time and Crysis 3 will be naked.

    This game is the same as Crysis 1 was perhaps little better. You do not play it for fun, fresh and intense shooter experience. Despite the fact, that Crytek wants to persuade you, its opposite and all this nanosuit's features, opponents and shooting are incredibly cool they are not. You play Crysis 3 for tessellated water, global illumination and particle shadows. Then you will return to first F.E.A.R., Far Cry and Unreal, if you want to play a real good shooter.

    However, in the fluffy world of Crysis with no gore, weak shaking weapons and weak opponents, Crysis 3 is the best of all! It is not an infamous Crysis 2 at least on PC. Combat, whenever its EAlized boring averageness, is the funniest of all in the franchise. Broken New York is full of interesting scenes and when the game tells you "look, this is cool", it actually is cool. Not like Crysis 2 "oh damn, another falling skyscraper scene, sigh".    … Expand
  19. lloydy280
    Mar 3, 2013
    7
    Beautiful...absent of soul and lacking the spark of 1&Warhead... even 2 had its moments. Oh and its laughably short but I am an older gamer and I have come to expect 20+ hours to mean value. But hey, its a good looking game. The bow is fun but makes everything too easy, the AI sucks... if you can pick it up as a bargain then go for it...
  20. DCLXVIag
    Mar 1, 2013
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Well... there's much to tell.. and not much same time..

    Stunning grapghics? maybe.. but not as stunning as they were promised. probably because then there would be no machines able to run this with current optimization:) Absolutely gorgeous soundtrack..! Yeah!!
    Interesting story, pity that sometimes it was just too predictable.. especially i was amazed how those idiots didnt get it that the old guy was possesed...
    And stupid AI.. just really dumb..they know they are confronting invisible guy, and make nothing from it. They just keep walking by, checking on corpses of their mates, and die exactly at the same spot.. The bow is just a cheat, it makes the game too easy. All those special arrows are simply not required. You can stealth kill almost any opponent in the game and pick your arrows to kill next guy. I've beaten it on max difficulty level without even trying easier ones... Unforgiving they say? lol... TOO DAMN EASY. The only difficulty was fighting stalkers in second mission when the suit broke down... and final boss was not too chalenging.. but took some time to kill..
    Any1 who loved crysis1+warhead will see all those major flaws here.. and "open" levels are still just corridors.. sad...    … Expand
  21. Purgatory1
    Mar 4, 2013
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Note that his rating is for the PC version only:

    - State of the art graphics, not much more to say to this
    - Good but not extraordinary sound and music (see also Atmosphere rating)
    - Mediocre gameplay, weapons system pretty much the same as in Crysis 2. The hacking minigame is just boring, Weapons system not really comfortable to use on a PC with a keyboard. Integrating a "god mode" by overloading the nanosuit is imho just stupid and boring. Never had the feeling to face smart enemies, thus not the best AI but not bad either.
    - Story is okay, way better told than in Crysis 2 but still very predictable and not very complex
    - Atmosphere is okay but not really what I would call stunning. The battle sound sometimes starts without really being in battle if you sneak by an enemy.
    - Not much innovation except for the graphics and maybe the bow. Just like in Crysis 2 you first fight Cell, then Cell plus Ceph and finally only the Ceph in an alien level.

    Conclusion:
    standard shooter with fantastic graphics, good music/sound and the rest ist pretty much average.    … Expand
  22. Exostenza
    Feb 23, 2013
    6
    The game has fantastic graphics and is the first piece of software that has really been able to show me what my top notch year old hardware can do. I only give it a 7 in so far as nothing has taken advantage of modern PCs over the last year and it is nice to get a game that does. On the flip side the game has serious consolitis the areas are fairly small and corridor like, the AI isThe game has fantastic graphics and is the first piece of software that has really been able to show me what my top notch year old hardware can do. I only give it a 7 in so far as nothing has taken advantage of modern PCs over the last year and it is nice to get a game that does. On the flip side the game has serious consolitis the areas are fairly small and corridor like, the AI is wickedly stupid, the game even on the harder settings is overly easy and the suit modes are still dumbed down compared to the first game this game has amazing graphics and semi-passable game-play. I would feel bad for anyone who picked this up for full price as really when it comes down to it the game is just not very good in any sense other than the graphics. If the graphics weren't so good I would have rated it a 6.… Expand
  23. Chewy_47
    Feb 20, 2013
    6
    To preface this, this review is coming from a PC player, who prior to playing this game re-played both Crysis 1 and Crysis 2. My review will hyperfocus on what disappointed me, and you may not have felt the same way. Cevat Yerli, boss of Crytek (the development studio behind Cry 3) for months ahead of release was touting the incredible graphics achievement of Crysis 3. He brought backTo preface this, this review is coming from a PC player, who prior to playing this game re-played both Crysis 1 and Crysis 2. My review will hyperfocus on what disappointed me, and you may not have felt the same way. Cevat Yerli, boss of Crytek (the development studio behind Cry 3) for months ahead of release was touting the incredible graphics achievement of Crysis 3. He brought back the 'Can it Cun?' question, from the original Crysis. Can your PC run Crysis 3? Can it run it at Max settings? A clever gimmick, and one that was relevant in 2007, because Crysis 1 truly was cutting-edge. I played this game with a GTX 680/3770k overall an upper-tier machine, that can easily max out 99% of games while achieving high frames per second. For the record I'm also on the newest certified Nvidia drivers. I also played this monitoring my FPS in-game, using a program called FRAPS which shows your frames per second, in-game. GRAPHICS: Huge disappointment to the PC gamer. Why? Because of the lack of stability in FPS. On the 'high' preset, in standard settings, I would be getting FPS of 50-60, but then, look into the distance or through a window and BOOM. FPS drops 75%. This was awful. I've never encountered such irritating instability in FPS. And it's not because of superior graphics, it's because of poor optimization from the developers, and maybe intentionally to enforce their 'Can it Play?' gimmick. At the end of it all, in order to keep my sanity while playing I had to do a massive tweak of the settings, where putting a couple advanced settings on low seemed to help a lot. Here's a tip for the first part with the rain: Turn water to low, because all that cruddy-looking rain is burning your FPS. Here's the other thing about the graphics, nothing ground-breaking, nothing new, and not much of a step up from Crysis 2, which was a very stable game comparatively. The graphics are not the best I've seen, and objects seem jagged despite high settings and high Anti-Aliasing. GAME IMPROVEMENT? To call this Crysis 2.5 would be an overstatement. There is very little innovation and improvement from the gameplay mechanisms of Crysis 2. THE BOW: You obtain the bow weapon in the first 10 minutes of the game. For the remainder of the game, you feel inclined to remain cloaked, use the bow for insta-kills, and then pick up your arrows after. Infinite ammo unbalanced weapon that breaks the game. THE STORY: Feels forced, unrealistic. Dialogue doesn't feel human. It feels like watching a bad movie. INTEL: Pieces of "Intel" you pick up as one of your only rewards for exploring. They are the usual generic audio/text background story elements, except they act a tedious mechanic, and feel like a forced addition to Crysis 3. PSYCHO: A character from Crysis 1 (and Warhead). In the first game he acted like a rational person, a human being. In Crysis 3 he is physically a different person; he looks different, has a different voice, and acts differently. He goes from being an asset to the story in Cry 1, to being a whiney disturbance, and carrying his personal baggage into the mission.

    PROPHET: A character who progresses through the series as a seemingly wise, mature, and hardened individual. In Crysis 3, he seems to play along with the childish antics of Psycho, and takes himself down a notch in the process. THE AI: Possibly the worst of the series. Basic human enemies are incompetent fools that can be destroyed with little effort. You know it's a bad sign, when in the first fifteen minutes of the game you overhear the same 'unique' guard chatter twice. THE VERDICT: I could probably add a number more details. The bottom line is this is the worst game of the series, and I genuinely feel it deserves a 6/10, while the other two games float around an 8.5/10.    … Expand
  24. tombo
    Feb 22, 2013
    6
    Maybe I miss more aliens. Perhaps after playing great open-world shooters like Far Cry 3 or Borderlands 2,for me, this game disappoints.I'm just sort of lost in Crysis 3's long weeds. The narrative is not that compelling, and the AI and combat in general, are too repetitive in terms of strategy, dialogue,etc.
    Graphically, it's beautiful stunningly so.
  25. snorlax
    Feb 23, 2013
    7
    Firstly like to say GREAT game. Esp cos of the new Bow. However few things that should change are: 1. Not enough time to modify loadouts between matches (the menus and buttons to equip equipment are very clunky and long to navigate) im guessing they made it this way cos of console. 2. Not enough time to switch loadouts in-game, also hindered by the fact that the menus materialise, soFirstly like to say GREAT game. Esp cos of the new Bow. However few things that should change are: 1. Not enough time to modify loadouts between matches (the menus and buttons to equip equipment are very clunky and long to navigate) im guessing they made it this way cos of console. 2. Not enough time to switch loadouts in-game, also hindered by the fact that the menus materialise, so doesnt help when trying to change after death. Should have ability to check box for "Auto-spawn" or not which will give player option to switch loadout at death or auto-respawn with chosen loadout 3. Please add "skip -replay" for deaths. Not everyone wants to watch the replay. This may tie into the spawn time, which is why a Spawn button/menu along with loadouts should appear at death/time to spawn (look at how BF3 does it the game isn't popular for no reason)… Expand
  26. Shady1992
    Feb 24, 2013
    7
    Crysis 3 is the worst game I've played.Crysis 3 have bad story,bad gameplay,everything is bad.Game is so boring that it is impossible to finish.......
  27. AxeFish
    Mar 10, 2013
    6
    I honestly had more fun with Crysis 3 than I expected to have. But then again, I expected nothing from this game when I saw it at E3 2012.
    Let's just say this: If you liked Crysis 2, you're going to love this game. It pretty much improves upon everything from that game. The game opened up quite a bit and gives you a purpose to explore, as there are off-path caves and such that contain    I honestly had more fun with Crysis 3 than I expected to have. But then again, I expected nothing from this game when I saw it at E3 2012.
    Let's just say this: If you liked Crysis 2, you're going to love this game. It pretty much improves upon everything from that game. The game opened up quite a bit and gives you a purpose to explore, as there are off-path caves and such that contain hidden upgrades and collectibles. The game is also a whole lot more dynamic due to the fact that everything movement related (sprinting, power jumps) now don't take off suit energy, which makes the game a whole lot more dynamic.
    However you were disappointed with Crysis 2, this probably won't change your mind, as the main gameplay style is still the same. The nanosuit is still very stripped down, giving you only the option between Stealth and Armor mode. The campaign is also very short and pretty easy even on "Post-Human warrior". There's also not a lot of replay value to it, seeing how there's a lot of unskippable dialogue. Granted, it's not as scripted as Crysis 2, but it's still very tedious.

    Multiplayer is fun, although besides of the nanosuit and it's mobility, there's not a whole lot to it that you wouldn't get from other Modern Multiplayer shooters. Still, I'd say it's worth checking out.

    Overall, if you did not enjoy Crysis 2, I'd say it's worth a rental. Otherwise, go buy it, you'll have fun with it!    … Expand
  28. EyesofWrath
    Sep 13, 2014
    7
    One of the best looking games to date, but certainly not groundbreaking. Everything has a superficial polish, but under the hood the game lacks anything truly great.

    VISUALS: The graphics are amazing, but the FOV and hud mean that you can't see much of the world at any given time. STORY AND CHARACTERS: The writing is by far the weakest part of the game. It tries to be much smarter    One of the best looking games to date, but certainly not groundbreaking. Everything has a superficial polish, but under the hood the game lacks anything truly great.

    VISUALS: The graphics are amazing, but the FOV and hud mean that you can't see much of the world at any given time.

    STORY AND CHARACTERS: The writing is by far the weakest part of the game. It tries to be much smarter than it is - the characters are always one step behind the player in terms of the twists and turns of the plot and you feel like the writers take you for an idiot when something telegraphed hours ago finally happens and everyone is in shock except for you. To put it simply - if they say something can't possibly happen, it's happens. And they try to tackle the ethics and morals of 'man vs machine' but it's handled so clumsily it's as if a high-school student wrote the dialogue. This isn't assisted by the fact that the characters are boring and you can't form emotional attachments to any of them because they don't think and act in any relatable way.

    GAMEPLAY: The gunplay mechanics are smooth and fun and the seamless integration of the nanosuit technology makes this one of the game's strongest points. However, the battles have an episodic feel to them in the sense that the enemies only pop up once you reach a certain point on the map, and never exist dynamically in the world. So you kill a bunch of guys, move to the next area, kill a bunch of guys, etc, etc. On top of this, the use of vehicles is shoe-horned in and is completely redundant, and the game takes control away from the player for in-game cutscenes far too many times, and in completely unnecessary situations. If they had let you control the ship you're in rather than putting it on rails, or let you follow the characters actively and observe your surroundings, rather than watching passively the game could have had more life to it.

    OVERALL: Somewhere along the line, Cryktek forgot what made the original Crysis so fun, and even though Crysis 2 bored me, this is my least favourite in the series for the simple fact that while number 2 felt like a corridor shooter compared to the original, it took place in the city streets so at least this feeling was contextualised. Crysis 3, on the other hand, tries to pretend it's much bigger and grander than it is. It has the corridor-shooter feel of the second game, but tries to hide this fact by adding some open fields for you to trudge through. That's all well and good if there's something interesting to see in the field, but the only interesting scenery is on the horizon, and the only place worth going is towards the objective.

    I give this a 7 because the engine is amazing and the gunplay is genuinely good. But a qualitative rating would be an 'eh' out of 10.    … Expand
  29. Xodan
    Mar 5, 2013
    7
    First of all: The graphics are the best that i have ever seen.
    Unfortunately this is the only extraordinary feature of the game. The characters are the best and most "living" in all Crysis games. The Story is not that amazing but its solid. The sound is amazing. The overall Gameplay is also good. 7/10 points from me: -1 for story -1 for short duration -1 for uninteresting Multiplayer part.
  30. JayTWOjay
    Mar 5, 2013
    7
    I love the new lanscape and atmosohere, but its literally pointless, maybe you kick car here or there, and the graphics are amazin on max, but just feels like crysis dlc with pretty nice surroundings, and of course the shoehorned same multiplsyer EVERY game now has to have. I can see the meeting of pulbisher and devs now "We have a dark horse of succss in Dark Souls, anway we can make itI love the new lanscape and atmosohere, but its literally pointless, maybe you kick car here or there, and the graphics are amazin on max, but just feels like crysis dlc with pretty nice surroundings, and of course the shoehorned same multiplsyer EVERY game now has to have. I can see the meeting of pulbisher and devs now "We have a dark horse of succss in Dark Souls, anway we can make it lot easierk AND add capture the FLAG!?!? OMG YOU ARE GETTING A RAISE JOHNSON,.… Expand
  31. R00TKILL
    Apr 26, 2013
    6
    OK so this game is beautiful on graphics we all expect that by now, and the story has gone with the end world scenario once again though more linear than I would like. And after playing it for 4 hours I feel that it was definitely worth waiting for the 50% off that origin offered, I paid 30$ for this game and that is well worth it.
    Multiplayer is the killer of this game that's why i    OK so this game is beautiful on graphics we all expect that by now, and the story has gone with the end world scenario once again though more linear than I would like. And after playing it for 4 hours I feel that it was definitely worth waiting for the 50% off that origin offered, I paid 30$ for this game and that is well worth it.
    Multiplayer is the killer of this game that's why i didn't buy it for 60$ when it first came out, Unless those FPS game developers decide to take a lesson for Battlefield they should just give up on the MP mode.
    So here are some pros and cons on the game that i have noticed. Also
    I will not be commenting on the story line since i haven't finished it yet even though I am almost there.
    Pros:
    New Weapons
    Awesome Graphics
    Game play seems to be running real smooth
    AI is alright nothing impressive just alright i guess.

    Cons:
    Speed mode is still gone wtf...
    I not a fan of the cute looking squirrels running around.
    The story has just not grabbed my interest yet, dunno why but it just doesn't match up to the first one.
    This game was optimized for consoles and you catch a sense of that when your playing ^^^
    Psycho got fat and doesn't look the same is this bugging anyone lol.

    Conclusion: This game was well worth 30$ I'm glad that I bought it on sell so I can experience where the Crysis Series is going >Consoles...    … Expand
  32. jst68
    Feb 25, 2013
    5
    The biggest letdown is that Crysis 3 is only released on Origin. That pretty much ruins it for me from the get go. EA continuously shows us that they are ignoring customers who prefer storing their games in one game collection. I have yet to meet anyone who likes Origin. Why not give it up and move your titles back to Steam? It would certainly be something that would make EA moreThe biggest letdown is that Crysis 3 is only released on Origin. That pretty much ruins it for me from the get go. EA continuously shows us that they are ignoring customers who prefer storing their games in one game collection. I have yet to meet anyone who likes Origin. Why not give it up and move your titles back to Steam? It would certainly be something that would make EA more likeable to gamers.
    Anyhow, coming to the actual game. I only played it at a friend's house and I am glad I didn't pre-order it because it is only on Origin. To sum it up: It looks great and it is fun to play, but there certainly aren't too many new things to see. This series needs some attention and love. It feels and plays like a giant tech show, but there isn't much else around it. I am wondering if this is caused by trying to become another CoD? Get real! CoD is kind of done and each new version is getting worse and worse. Why not take a look at some cool new titles that got good reviews? Dishonored comes to mind.    … Expand
  33. Scritty
    Feb 22, 2013
    5
    It's ok. The freedom of the original Crysis is missing, this is a much more on rails experience, and graphics aside adds nothing. So the way I see it, it's taken a 4 year old game and deducted one of my favourite aspects and improved on nothing. I'm back playing the original again and wondering how come Far Cry 3 is so darn good and Crysis 3 is so "Meh". It's not bad at all, it's just notIt's ok. The freedom of the original Crysis is missing, this is a much more on rails experience, and graphics aside adds nothing. So the way I see it, it's taken a 4 year old game and deducted one of my favourite aspects and improved on nothing. I'm back playing the original again and wondering how come Far Cry 3 is so darn good and Crysis 3 is so "Meh". It's not bad at all, it's just not any where near as good as it should be.… Expand
  34. Aeryx
    Feb 26, 2013
    5
    Call of Deus Modern Battlefield 3 (a.k.a Crysis3) is EA's latest attempt at producing anything that will win the title of world's dumbest game that sells like crazy (currently held by COD). My first impression of this game is "Thank God I didn't buy it!" I played this game at a friend's house because I am currently boycotting all EA games (and now my friend will do that too). The storyCall of Deus Modern Battlefield 3 (a.k.a Crysis3) is EA's latest attempt at producing anything that will win the title of world's dumbest game that sells like crazy (currently held by COD). My first impression of this game is "Thank God I didn't buy it!" I played this game at a friend's house because I am currently boycotting all EA games (and now my friend will do that too). The story feels totally disconnected from the first Crysis and this game feels like the bastard child of COD and Deus Ex Human Revolution. Totally uninspired gameplay and story is a drooling disgrace compared to the groundbreaking masterpiece that was the first game. I feel sad that this game will sell loads and perpetuate the cycle of emptyness that is today's PC/console gaming trend. Do we vote candidates based on how flashy their outfits are? Seems like the answer is yes. God help us all!… Expand
  35. unicornnz
    Mar 1, 2013
    6
    People highly rating Crysis 3 obviously have never played the first one. Firstly I have to say the graphics are not that great (I played on max settings.) However, when you step out into New York for the first time, it is stunning. Shortly the 'goggles' wear off, you are left with an average shooter that seems to be more of a benchmark demo. The motion blur looks good but the feel of itPeople highly rating Crysis 3 obviously have never played the first one. Firstly I have to say the graphics are not that great (I played on max settings.) However, when you step out into New York for the first time, it is stunning. Shortly the 'goggles' wear off, you are left with an average shooter that seems to be more of a benchmark demo. The motion blur looks good but the feel of it is awful and the controls are terrible. It has obviously been made with the console in mind (which is ironic because they basically sell this as a PC experience. I never finished the game and don't have any need to. In saying this, I know it will sell well, the console kiddies will lap this crap up just like annualized COD. Crysis 3 is a prettier, bastardized version of Crysis 1. If you want the real 'experience' buy Crysis 1 for under $10 and crank up the settings. The story is far more engaging and the multiplayer (sadly dead i believe) was far superior… Expand
  36. TogetherLemon
    Feb 22, 2013
    6
    Crysis 3 is not a bad game, but it certainly doesn't live up to the standards of the previous two. Lets start off with the basics (This is a review of the PC version, not the console versions). The graphics of this game look great, and the game is optimized very well, although it will still require a pretty good rig to run at a competitive level. The sound is good too, but the music isCrysis 3 is not a bad game, but it certainly doesn't live up to the standards of the previous two. Lets start off with the basics (This is a review of the PC version, not the console versions). The graphics of this game look great, and the game is optimized very well, although it will still require a pretty good rig to run at a competitive level. The sound is good too, but the music is nothing noteworthy. The controls are tight and responsive, debatably better than the previous two games in the series. Unfortunately, that about ends all of the highlights of this game. Lets take a look at single player, shall we? Single player is an unimaginative, mangled storyline which garbles up a bunch of corridor shooting sequences in large levels, and calls itself a sandbox game. This game is not a sandbox. At all. Also, the A.I. seems to be mentally handicapped, I can literally cloak while someone is looking at me, and they will have no idea where I went. The campaign took me about 6 hours to complete on the Supersoldier difficulty. That might seem rather short to some of you, but I had more than enough of my share of such a mediocre campaign that I let out a sigh of relief when I finally finished. Next is the multiplayer, far and away the most attractive part of this game. The multiplayer in Crysis 2 was good, but it struggled from unoriginality. Crysis 3 has seemingly mended this. It has added original gamemodes, exciting weapons, and new mechanics that are rarely seen in other FPS games. The maps are also great, featuring lush environments and good overall design. However, the quality of the multiplayer is not too great. For whatever reason, the quick match feature has a strange selection menu where you choose game modes that you are willing to play on, as opposed to just choosing a game mode. This would work totally fine but Crytek created this system idiotically, not allowing you to be paired up with someone with even 1 different search parameter. If you have crash site selected, and everything else turned off, you can't get into a game with someone who has everything turned on. This essentially forces you to rely on the server browser. The actual gameplay of the multiplayer seems broken at times. You can run up behind an enemy and shoot them 20 times in the back before they finally die. Other times people die in 2 shots. I have had multiple situations where I activate armor mode before I can even see the enemy, and then I die faster than my brain can even comprehend the fact that I was getting shot at. Overall, the game is enjoyable, but even that is a stretch. I did not enjoy the single player mode at all, it was a chore. When you have force yourself to play through a game as short as 6 hours, you know that it is not good. Luckily the multiplayer picks this game up a few points. If you are planning to buy the game solely for the singleplayer mode, I would rate singleplayer as a 2/10.… Expand
  37. Danny83
    Feb 24, 2014
    6
    didn't finish, graphics not that much better than original (very overrated), aliens look like they are from halo. i foresee the death of crysis by consolization.
  38. sneakybeaver
    Mar 8, 2013
    5
    GOOD: Nice graphics and nanosuit. BAD: Too easy. Took under 7 hours to finish up, even that I was playing on the hardest mode and tried to explore maps for goods and so on. AI is so stupid and they are so easy to kill. Story was quite boring. And I didn't liked multiplayer game, because it was too much like those COD games. The original Crysis is still the best in my opinion.
  39. wszu
    May 12, 2013
    5
    This game is messy. Outstanding visually but the story and gameplay are boring as hell. I had force myself to finish it. It is probably only good as a graphics card benchmark game.
  40. DragonBallZ
    Sep 14, 2013
    5
    The whole game is in stealth mode. Hardly any shooting involved. FPS is all about shooting. Too few characters. There is no emotional connection because story is just run of the mill. Game is overpriced for what it offers. Why all the high-end spec requirements? Most people don't play games just for graphics.
  41. EchoBlack
    Feb 24, 2013
    5
    Behind the good visuals lies a competent, yet uninspired game. Sadly, Crysis 1's gameplay aspirations are once again abandoned for the familiar trappings of the "cinematic" modern shooter formula. Some levels offer a modicum of "open-endedness", but these forks in the path are not enough to impress. As in Crysis 2, you cannot find vehicles to traverse the map, though some levels haveBehind the good visuals lies a competent, yet uninspired game. Sadly, Crysis 1's gameplay aspirations are once again abandoned for the familiar trappings of the "cinematic" modern shooter formula. Some levels offer a modicum of "open-endedness", but these forks in the path are not enough to impress. As in Crysis 2, you cannot find vehicles to traverse the map, though some levels have handful of quasi-forced vehicle sequences thrown in to change the pace a bit. The shooting and sneaking are OK: not bad, but nothing that stands out either. In the end, Crysis 3 is an utterly average experience, guaranteed to be forgotten. And on PC, I fear it will see more mileage as a benchmark tool than anything else.… Expand
  42. akarnokd
    Mar 3, 2013
    6
    I consider myself lucky to have a 1.5 years old gaming-like laptop where I could run this on medium settings. It felt a bit sluggish, haven't measured the fps. I played the prequels and I'm glad the green vegetation is back. Many say the graphics is stunning, but I didn't notice anything about it, it felt okay. One odd thing I saw was in one of the APC sections where the impact explosionI consider myself lucky to have a 1.5 years old gaming-like laptop where I could run this on medium settings. It felt a bit sluggish, haven't measured the fps. I played the prequels and I'm glad the green vegetation is back. Many say the graphics is stunning, but I didn't notice anything about it, it felt okay. One odd thing I saw was in one of the APC sections where the impact explosion looked like a flat, black rectangle with flames on it. Controls were a bit shaky, and there is, of course, the strange delay in jumping. Similar to Crysis 2, the explicit mapping of armor, stealth and speed modes to keys are good improvements in respect to Crysis 1. I play usually with inverted Y, and the VTOL section was annoying as it ignored this settings. Positive thing that now I could survive difficult encounters, unlike Crysis 1 where the poor NK soldiers seemed to have superior armor to you (played all on easy difficulty). I felt a bit tedious to battle in Cry1 second half. The music and sound effects are nothing special, but I miss the sound of the SCAR from Cry1. The story is average at best; It felt head scratching in Cry2 and it still remained as such. It didn't feel like a sandbox at all. The AI was gentle and polite with me, but I guess it won't become Skynet anytime soon. If I consider that many need to upgrade their hardware just to play it on bare minimum makes it overpriced. The time the upgrade happens, you'll sure get this for the fraction.… Expand
  43. Vasot
    Feb 19, 2013
    5
    The game is more worthy as a benchmark. It has great graphics but the enemy AI is poor and Single player is short .Gameplay wise it is nothing so special to get excited for. It does not worth the 60$
  44. ariegamerig
    Feb 26, 2013
    5
    i was so waiting for this game and now i understood that pc gaming is dead
    because when there was bad pc games you could always count on on a crysis game
    but after this one i think we need to droop pc gameing and buy a console
    its sad but true
  45. Xanifur
    Apr 25, 2013
    5
    Average SP at best. Mostly a corridor shooter, nowhere near as free as Crysis 1. Story is flat unlike the first. Kill the aliens. That's all there is to it. The single player was extremely short. Let's go back to the good old days of the first Crysis game.
  46. meediocre
    Mar 15, 2013
    7
    The game starts off a blast, however straight-away it becomes obvious that the story is a bit of a mess, and it really struggles to develop. As for the game and action clearly it's a lush-looking and frequently dazzling to look at, but there's not much in the way of new ideas here, gameplay-wise. Also, I would say that Crysis 2 has some better stand-out moments and fun encounters,The game starts off a blast, however straight-away it becomes obvious that the story is a bit of a mess, and it really struggles to develop. As for the game and action clearly it's a lush-looking and frequently dazzling to look at, but there's not much in the way of new ideas here, gameplay-wise. Also, I would say that Crysis 2 has some better stand-out moments and fun encounters, particularly with Cell. Apart from the mid-game boss, the Ceph are pretty much the same as before boring, but fun to kill. There are a couple of levels in this game that are epic and really well-designed, but as a whole this is a shooting gallery I have little intention or desire to replay through, unlike the previous games. A word on the multiplayer I had a go at it and gave up after about 10 minutes. Hunter-mode is just stupid. It's bad enough in multi-player games getting killed and not knowing where from, as it is. But this time it's from a guy who's wearing an invisible cloak, so er even less fun. Deathmatch is fast-paced, but there are certainly more fun MP options out there for FPS fans. In short, this Crysis has hit the mark in some areas but I feel a little disappointed especially at the end where my PC froze at the end boss, and I had to watch the ending on YouTube. I love my nanosuit action, but this is the end of the road for me.… Expand
  47. Magdi_alafifi
    Apr 19, 2013
    5
    Crysis 3 feels like it was all made for the crossbow, since it's the sole new thing they added, and the only equipment you will ever need through the whole campaign, Gameplay feels dull and empty, All i was doing is get cloaked, Kill some enemies with the crossbow (while still invisible), Go back behind cover to charge the nano-suit, and repeat the cycle, Ya doing that, and using theCrysis 3 feels like it was all made for the crossbow, since it's the sole new thing they added, and the only equipment you will ever need through the whole campaign, Gameplay feels dull and empty, All i was doing is get cloaked, Kill some enemies with the crossbow (while still invisible), Go back behind cover to charge the nano-suit, and repeat the cycle, Ya doing that, and using the crossbow, was actually fun, but after a short while it gets boring and repetitive..
    i barely finished that game, the ending was worth it though, it was epic, But still the peak point at the final mission was just as boring as the rest of the game and even more, Even with the intense sound track and fancy flashy visual it was still a very tedious mission.
    And the story, the story is actually just another aliens cliche, Crytek is trying disparately to make it look somehow unique and special, but truth is, it has a dumb cliche plot..
    I'd give it 4/10 but one more point for the great ending.    … Expand
  48. UnderTheRain
    Mar 7, 2013
    6
    Crytek have no doubt made and amazing engine however this is more of an interactive movie with less of the interactive and more of the movie. The engine and graphics and sublime truely exquisite and the story is gripping and thoroughly entertaining throughout however theres far too much of it and not enough game. You spend 10 min killing 10 mobs to have a further 10 mins of cutscene andCrytek have no doubt made and amazing engine however this is more of an interactive movie with less of the interactive and more of the movie. The engine and graphics and sublime truely exquisite and the story is gripping and thoroughly entertaining throughout however theres far too much of it and not enough game. You spend 10 min killing 10 mobs to have a further 10 mins of cutscene and whilst the presentation is the best out there I can't help feeling that whilst they were perfecting their storytelling machine they forgot about the game. The small amounts of game that are in here are very good the world enviroment is beautiful and incredibly detailed but you don't seen enough of it this engine undoubtedly is the current graphics king but they need more game. Your cut scenes come far too often there aren't enough enemies in enough quantity or variety and then playable parts of the game are far too small and far too easy. As a game this falls very short as a demo of what the crytek engine is capable of its undeniably supreme. I have two 680gtx's and I would happily of swapped a ton of that eye candy for a bigger game with better more challenging gameplay. The game is far too basic and far to simple to keep you engaged I will probably never play it through ever again it holds no challenge. The vihicles felt loose and not very controllable and the multiplay is just as laggy as hell. For eye candy this is awesome, for storytelling this is awesome as a game its sub par and as a multiplayer game its also sub par. Still the best campaign is Half-life 2 and for my money at present the best multiplayer experience is BF3.

    Graphics 10

    Story 10

    Cutscenes 5 they're just too big a part of the game you spend as much time watching as you do playing probably more if you charge through the levels. They would be fine if the game was 10 times bigger.

    Gameplay 6 could be so much better it shows all of the potential but struggles to deliver on the promise (repetative sub games unlocking stuff). To much stop-starting with too many cut scenes theres no flow to the gameplay and the vehicles are terrible

    Enemies 5 Not enough, Not enough variety, Very dumb AI

    Multiplayer 3 laggy lag lag lag

    Crysis 3 suffers from the same problem as almost all modern fps they're short eyecandy and dull to play with no repeat playabilitty whatsoever. I lost count of the amout of times I played through Doom 1/2, Quake 1 HL2. Sadly C3 will join rage and a whole raft of other fps that I will never look at again. We want fast paced arcade style shooters with big boss fights at the end of each chapter and lots of chapters. Make the games feel epic again. Even with this engine because of all the crappy cutscenes and interruptions even the final boss fight in C3 feels like a chore (the first time I got there I actually turned it off at the first checkpoint as it was a boring encounter). I had to push myself to comeback and kill him this isn't how a game should be. Crytek, id, EA etc etc were gonna stop buying these games soon not because they're bad but because they're boring.    … Expand
  49. Blackluc
    Mar 5, 2013
    6
    Crysis games are known for the good graphics. That's why I bought Crysis 2 when it came out, and now Crysis 3. The third game is really poor. The campaign isn't fun at all. You just move forward, cloak, shoot, continue. I love shooting, I am really a fps player, but I don't know why, Crysis games are just missing something in their gameplay. The multiplayer has nothing more to offerCrysis games are known for the good graphics. That's why I bought Crysis 2 when it came out, and now Crysis 3. The third game is really poor. The campaign isn't fun at all. You just move forward, cloak, shoot, continue. I love shooting, I am really a fps player, but I don't know why, Crysis games are just missing something in their gameplay. The multiplayer has nothing more to offer than Crysis 2, except the Hunter gameplay which is really fun. It's probably the only reason I play. But really, what is the worst about this game, is EA's marketing with the "hunter bow". Trailers and teasers were all about "the cool bow". They called the game "hunter edition" and the cover is again about "the bow". They really tried to look cool and get people to want the game thinking there's something new and really cool, but it's not. You get the bow as your first weapon, to kill silently while cloaked. The thing is, you can only carry 9 arrows and you can't always easily pick them up after you shot some. In other words, just use a gun of you want to kill from a distance or if you want to run arround to get your arrows back, why not just do some melee kills? And arrow refills are pretty rare compared to gun ammo. Onine, the bow is useless too. I tried and tried to use it, but it just sucks. I also see other people trying to use it, but they just die and die without killing anybody. The question is Did they include the bow because they really wanted it to make Crysis 3 a better game? Or because of the hunger games, arrow, walking dead, avengers, The bow is something "cool" right now? I bought crysis 2 for 20 bucks maybe a year after the release. You should all do the same with Crysis 3, because paying 60 bucks for any EA game today is a ripoff.… Expand
  50. Koreenium
    Mar 6, 2013
    5
    Yeah it has good graphics and nice environments but the story is IMHO still traditionally BORING! I never finished Crysis because of its story, barely finished Crysis 2 and Crysis 3 I'm just going to sell and never look back because I just can't finish it.
  51. JohnnyPark
    Mar 29, 2013
    6
    The entire Crysis series to me has been a perfect example of style over substance. If you want your run of the mill FPS where you mindlessly shoot enemies, this is it. The story is not engaging, and the characters are unable to be liked. In spite of the stunning visuals and beautiful graphics, the game was a chore to get through.
  52. Nova20HUN
    Apr 6, 2013
    5
    Only 5 because its not working on DX10 or lower, and it needs a better pc than crysis 2 needed. I dont know why because same engine. I hope they add DX10 soon..
  53. ArdianDX
    Jun 25, 2013
    7
    Crysis 3 is a pretty good game the graphics are nice the nanosuit are nice but the campaign is the problem you can finish it for 6 hours only that is but the multiplayer make crysis 3 not boring if the multiplayer in crysis 3 doesn't exist this game is up but if you think this game is not good enough Choose crysis 1 or 2 it's better than this
  54. Gary14
    Jan 25, 2014
    6
    Best Shooting game ever !!! This game got great storyline and There are new weapons and this need good pc to run this game greatly and this game is ever written by the xbox viewer that "The best shotting game ever is back" and more info is in it's website ( www.crytek.com / www.crytec.com )

    #THX
  55. Iluvatar21
    Apr 29, 2014
    5
    HOW I RATE: 10-9 score: perfect or near-perfect don't exist; 8 score: one of the best games ever. Top score; 7-6 score: great but not one of the best; 5-below score: serious flaws.
    ===========
    What has been Crysis since 2007 if not a pretty tech demo? Gameplay wise there is NOTHING interesting (expect the clocking device that makes you feel like the Predator if the Predator used human    HOW I RATE: 10-9 score: perfect or near-perfect don't exist; 8 score: one of the best games ever. Top score; 7-6 score: great but not one of the best; 5-below score: serious flaws.
    ===========
    What has been Crysis since 2007 if not a pretty tech demo? Gameplay wise there is NOTHING interesting (expect the clocking device that makes you feel like the Predator if the Predator used human weapons). Don't be fooled into this game.    … Expand
  56. iansarmy1
    Jul 18, 2014
    7
    Yes it looks amazing, maxed out on high end gaming rig this is the best looking game ever made. However as a game it is only mediocre, it is more a benchmark for PC enthusiasts and a vehicle for the developer to sell their engine. Its story and setting are just rehashes of Crysis 2, which though a disappointment graphics wise, was actually a better game.
  57. InsaneCarduelis
    Sep 24, 2014
    5
    ]Why the bow is sign of this game ? There are only max 15 arrows so in 90%of game you use only typical guns for other fps and it's haven't got better gameplay than call of duty or battlefield . Graphic ? If i want to word i will go on walk with dog, not play games. It's very avarge game.
  58. Broyax
    Apr 17, 2017
    5
    Magnifique ce Crysis 3 bien que sensiblement plus exigeant que le 2 côté matériel mais en réglant quelques options, le résultat est toujours très impressionnant d'autant que les niveaux sont bien plus grands qu'auparavant. La jouabilité n'a pas changé depuis le 2 (si ce n'est l'arc très gratifiant à l'usage) et reste excellente avec son mélange infiltration et rentre-dedans.

    Il est    Magnifique ce Crysis 3 bien que sensiblement plus exigeant que le 2 côté matériel mais en réglant quelques options, le résultat est toujours très impressionnant d'autant que les niveaux sont bien plus grands qu'auparavant. La jouabilité n'a pas changé depuis le 2 (si ce n'est l'arc très gratifiant à l'usage) et reste excellente avec son mélange infiltration et rentre-dedans.

    Il est après un premier parcours aussi bon que le second épisode à deux détails près et pas des moindres... D'abord son boss de fin, grotesque et con (on se croirait dans un jeu japoniais), ensuite son instabilité notoire (erreur "dxgi device removed", 4 fois en tout, ça commence à bien faire -il oublie la carte vidéo, rien que ça...) ; enfin ses retours au bureau intempestifs toutes les 2 mn (ou toutes les 30 s ça dépend) juste après avoir vaincu ce boss idiot mais qui obligent à le recommencer puisque le point de sauvegarde est au milieu du combat. Impossible de finir le jeu dans ces conditions, c'est quand même ballot...

    Heureusement un patch est sorti (plus d'un mois après la sortie...) et corrige ce bug foireux, il était temps... voilà qui permet la confirmation définitive que la fin est nulle à chier : le boss lui-même, la configuration du niveau qui fait la part belle au bourrinage idiot et la petite séquence vaguement interactive qui vient après est assez ridicule. Assez bâclé donc ce Crysis 3 mais avec (encore) de bons moments ici et là.    … Expand
  59. Gracz-org
    Aug 8, 2017
    7
    Crysis 3 wciąga jak dobry film akcji i choć możemy łatwo domyślić się przebiegu wydarzeń oraz zakończenia to chcemy przeżyć to na własnej skórze. Kolejny raz musimy przecież uratować świat i mimo tego, że robiłem to już tyle razy, to starałem się podejść do tego poważnie… serio! ^^ Szkoda tylko, że gra jest tak krótka (przejście jej zajmuje około 6-7 godzin), po takim tytule oczekiwaliśmyCrysis 3 wciąga jak dobry film akcji i choć możemy łatwo domyślić się przebiegu wydarzeń oraz zakończenia to chcemy przeżyć to na własnej skórze. Kolejny raz musimy przecież uratować świat i mimo tego, że robiłem to już tyle razy, to starałem się podejść do tego poważnie… serio! ^^ Szkoda tylko, że gra jest tak krótka (przejście jej zajmuje około 6-7 godzin), po takim tytule oczekiwaliśmy przecież zdecydowanie czegoś więcej…

    Pełna recenzja dostępna jest na blogu Gracz.org    … Expand
  60. nitorita
    Nov 21, 2020
    6
    A sequel that could have been great but was weighed on by weak gameplay. There is a decent story backing the game, but it is not particularly original if you have played sci-fi shooters before. The graphics are nice, but not noteworthy.

    The majority of the game feels optional, as all you do is cloak whenever you can and then walk past enemies or shoot them in the head. Gunning down    A sequel that could have been great but was weighed on by weak gameplay. There is a decent story backing the game, but it is not particularly original if you have played sci-fi shooters before. The graphics are nice, but not noteworthy.

    The majority of the game feels optional, as all you do is cloak whenever you can and then walk past enemies or shoot them in the head. Gunning down enemies is simpler than any other alternative as the enemy AI is incredibly primitive. Since the maps are condensed and linear, you never bother to strategize how to deal with targets and simply take them head-on or ignore them. There are holes around the maps that you can accidentally get stuck in, forcing you to restart from the last checkpoint. I chose the Veteran (hard) difficulty, and even though I wanted to, I was unable to raise the difficulty afterwards.

    Overall, Crysis 3 failed to scratch the same itch for me that the original Crysis did. It felt really tame. There was no room for creativity, no need for stealth, and killing enemies felt more like getting rid of people who were just in the way. If anything, this sequel played out more like Metro 2033 than Hitman, and in a bad way. Nothing is particularly memorable in this sequel, so you can safely skip it.    … Expand
  61. Nameless2131
    Feb 6, 2020
    7
    9/10 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  62. kitru
    Feb 22, 2021
    6
    Nothing unusual-a shooting game. Nice graphics that from game to game does not improve much. Lots of costume options - but that's not new either. The plot is zero, as it should be in such games.
  63. MustisTheCat
    May 10, 2013
    7
    First off an advice DO NOT treat this title as a skulkgame. The AI is so dumb that if you overuse the cloak feature you will basically walk through the whole game. Definitely Crysis3 gives optimal single player experience if you play a bit of both creep in, do a mini shootout, hide for a few seconds, then enable armor and do them desperado style witha 50. cal. The game definitelyFirst off an advice DO NOT treat this title as a skulkgame. The AI is so dumb that if you overuse the cloak feature you will basically walk through the whole game. Definitely Crysis3 gives optimal single player experience if you play a bit of both creep in, do a mini shootout, hide for a few seconds, then enable armor and do them desperado style witha 50. cal. The game definitely promotes shootouts, there are lots and lots of weapons and ammo spread over each and every map. You can do it easy with the bow but it is meant for inept gamers. There have been added some cool pieces of hardware to mount on your weapons. If you want a challenge, you`ll be using just about every piece of equipment and vehicles for destruction and let me tell you it is so good! Yes, the game is a little slow at first but it picks up pretty quick when the cephs show up. They jump around, try to corner you, hide when low on health. The locations are actually okay. There definitely is incentive to visit every corner of each map, strike at one location, retreat and attack from a different direction. This is not a corridor shooter like some poeple say. For this reason I played Crysis3 purely in singleplayer and it took me 15hours. Yes, fifteen instead of five some people say. I would agree there are too many cutscenes I`d think made just to show off the graphics. Don`t get me wrong, graphics are very good, maybe the best, but we`ve seen that already in Crysis2. The final bossfight is mediocre at best. If you can buy it for not more than 30$ then I wholeheartedly recommend this game. Overall a good game with some nice moments but forgettable in the end. A 7out of 10 from me.… Expand
  64. ZaPaAl
    Mar 18, 2017
    7
    It's kind of like a big extension to Crysis 2. Nothing really innovative. The Bow could have been good, but it's rather pointless and using heavy guns is more fun in the end. Combat can be fun, but we have seen in the last 2 games already. I lost a lot of motivation half way through, luckily game picked up a bit again against the end.

    About 8 hours to finish the campaign. Story is not    It's kind of like a big extension to Crysis 2. Nothing really innovative. The Bow could have been good, but it's rather pointless and using heavy guns is more fun in the end. Combat can be fun, but we have seen in the last 2 games already. I lost a lot of motivation half way through, luckily game picked up a bit again against the end.

    About 8 hours to finish the campaign. Story is not really good, but it has it's emotional moments and it provides a conclusion to the series. Visuals are nice, a bit more taxing then in Crysis 2. Music is not as good anymore.
    Feels like Crytek lost it's spirit.    … Expand
  65. kane148
    May 30, 2014
    7
    This game was the worst of the series, in my opinion, but it was still pretty decent overall. The visuals are obviously great--but that's a given these days. The story is not terrible, but not great either. Then again, storyline never was the big selling point for the Crysis series. Unfortunately, the game introduces almost no new features from the previous title--so it's just more of theThis game was the worst of the series, in my opinion, but it was still pretty decent overall. The visuals are obviously great--but that's a given these days. The story is not terrible, but not great either. Then again, storyline never was the big selling point for the Crysis series. Unfortunately, the game introduces almost no new features from the previous title--so it's just more of the same. The nanosuit upgrade system is a little more fleshed out, and there's new bow weapon, but that's about it for new features. While lacking the open-world environment of the original Crysis, this title does at least provide an interesting city/jungle hybrid environment. In the end, the thing that really made this game lose points with me was that it felt like it was designed to be easy: most areas have only small pockets of enemies, which can be stealthily dispatched at your leisure. You usually have the time to just pick them off one by one until you clear the area--and even if you alert them, you can play hide-and-seek with your cloak all day. Also, there were almost no intense fights: one of the few things I really liked about Crysis 2 was the parts where you just have to stand your ground and fight off big waves of alien attackers. In this game, about the only time you have to fight anything is when you get spotted whilst sneaking. Overall I still think it's worth playing, if you are a fan of the series, but sadly it just doesn't live up to its predecessor in most areas...… Expand
  66. Kaniya
    Mar 26, 2013
    6
    Crysis 3 still suffers from the things that Crysis 2 did. In terms of technology it is true that CryTeck left behind the boundaries of console. The game is truly a next gen game in terms of graphics when you have the the right rig to get a smooth 30FPS on very high setting. I dont think so any of PS4 games that were shown are on par with it even but in terms of Gameplay its just the sameCrysis 3 still suffers from the things that Crysis 2 did. In terms of technology it is true that CryTeck left behind the boundaries of console. The game is truly a next gen game in terms of graphics when you have the the right rig to get a smooth 30FPS on very high setting. I dont think so any of PS4 games that were shown are on par with it even but in terms of Gameplay its just the same mess as Crysis 2, a little big bigger a little bit less linear but still is nothing compare to CrySis 1 which im truly sorry for that
    other side, the AI is terrible and jungle areas in games are not that much u go trhough the different areas but jungles. seems like each of levels are meant to show how much cryengine can handle ....
    finally Crysis has ended better than crysis 2 but worst than first one     … Expand
  67. monkeyspunk
    Apr 2, 2013
    6
    The ads said Adapt on the fly with the stealth and armour abilities of your unique Nanosuit as you battle through the seven wonders of New York’s Liberty Dome. But my nanosuit warrior couldn't even hack the first door which meant he had to trawl the forums to find out he had to default his keyboard layout to get past the 1st door lol nice to know they don't test there games fully beforeThe ads said Adapt on the fly with the stealth and armour abilities of your unique Nanosuit as you battle through the seven wonders of New York’s Liberty Dome. But my nanosuit warrior couldn't even hack the first door which meant he had to trawl the forums to find out he had to default his keyboard layout to get past the 1st door lol nice to know they don't test there games fully before letting them out..But after that ye nice enough game looks very nice but the nanosuit hud looks cheap and i still prefer cysis1 suit layout to crysis2/3. Some of the elements of the game like the hacking are really cheap and cheesy but all in all better game than cysiss2. The multiplayer part i played a little but i thought it was crap ..but for me crysis is a single player game so i weren't bothered.… Expand
  68. Saratosa75
    Mar 25, 2013
    5
    Mediocre tunnel shooter wrapped into a great engine. There is no denial, the graphics looks great. The weapons handle good, although I couldn't find a favorite one. While the bow will dominate (and the game could just have a bow with more arrows and that's all you need), the rest of the guns each of them have something that you will not like. Either power or accuracy or just how it feelsMediocre tunnel shooter wrapped into a great engine. There is no denial, the graphics looks great. The weapons handle good, although I couldn't find a favorite one. While the bow will dominate (and the game could just have a bow with more arrows and that's all you need), the rest of the guns each of them have something that you will not like. Either power or accuracy or just how it feels like in the game. Ok, the railgun feels like a sniper rifle, but that's it. They also obstruct a lot of the view. I can't believe, that Prophet just can't carry that bow held a little lower and still ready to fire. Same with the guns. I was actually choosing based on which one takes up less space on the screen. Ok, back to the game. I feel like I have already played this game a 100 times. Actually I felt like I was playing Mass Effect without the ducking silliness. The stealth+bow combo is pretty much all you gonna use anyway, it's feels like I'm cheating though. Enemies are dumb. They just walk towards me and I gun them down like lemmings.
    There is too much cinematics...I guess the devs were so impressed by their graphics, that I am half-watching half-playing, which I don't exactly favor in any games. If I want to watch a movie, then I pop in into my TV and lay back, but when it comes to games, I want to play. There isn't enough freedom to move around. Given a level, which is a determined size of area where to fight, and that's it, then you may move to a next waypoint, which is another area, and the whole freedom feel is destroyed by pushing some cinematics again, or the game warps you somewhere else, so there goes the "sandbox" feature. The length. It took me 2 nights to finish this game, I have hardly unlocked anything for the suit (saved a few upgrades), although I was hoping for something more to come, when the game abruptly ended on me out of the blue. That's it??? I got a bunch of suit upgrades saved..oh well, I was hoping for more, somehow I always felt like something bigger is gonna happen, something better is coming on the way, regarding guns/upgrades/suit useability. Yeah, you can customize the guns with different sights and ammo, but I always felt like, they don't make much difference, beside the scopes, but I've never felt I was gonna snipe with them, so I just used the reflex sights most of the time. Most of the time means, when I was out of arrows for the bow. So in a summary, I think this game feels like something blast from the past mediocre shooter..with upgraded graphics. Nice try, but next time keep up with what's out there already. We got Skyrim for open area (a DX9 game!) or Just Cause 2, as an example of "sandbox shooter". I just can't go back and follow a path and a script, especially when the Crysis series started out with Crysis 1, the very definition of sandbox play! The game gets a 5 from me, just because it actually came out, it doesn't look ugly and it can be fun for a few hours, but hardly something I want to repeat to play again. Good thing I bought it on sale, it would NOT be worth of 50 dollars.    … Expand
  69. theneomaster
    Sep 7, 2013
    7
    I really liked Crysis 2, but I went into Crysis 3 with my expectations low due the user score here. And I was pleasantly surprised. First, the bad; there ARE some annoying bits, the level design can be confusing, and at times it's not very clear as to what you need to do or where you need to go. But it's mostly very good. QTEs are few and far in between but there are a lot of cutscenes. IfI really liked Crysis 2, but I went into Crysis 3 with my expectations low due the user score here. And I was pleasantly surprised. First, the bad; there ARE some annoying bits, the level design can be confusing, and at times it's not very clear as to what you need to do or where you need to go. But it's mostly very good. QTEs are few and far in between but there are a lot of cutscenes. If you're the sort of person who prefers complete control over their game at all times much like Valve's titles this game is probably not for you. Personally I'm fine with either. Now, for the good; The soundtrack is great, not quite as epic as Crysis 2's but nonetheless great. The graphics are truly brilliant, the story is memorable, the new Ceph weapons are pretty damn cool as is Psycho. I was going to give it an 8, but (no spoilers) the final boss fight ticked me off a bit it's about 5 minutes long and I died near the end just because I didn't mash space fast enough. But nonetheless, in conclusion Crysis 3 is far from a masterpiece, or trash as some people may have you believe. Just a really good, memorable, enjoyable game and a great sequel that I would recommend to any fan of the Crysis series.… Expand
  70. 1am4critic
    Apr 7, 2013
    7
    Graphics are really good, and I actually liked the soundtrack. Story was okay. New multiplayer modes aren't really that fun imho. Loved the weapon variety, and that bow is so powerful! I liked using the bow. I still think the way you control the nanosuit in crysis 1 makes more sense, though. I felt Crysis 1 was a more fun and open game experience
  71. agente_smith
    Apr 25, 2013
    7
    Amazing graphics, great gameplay but the duration of the short single player campaign and story continuity of the series has been decreasing since the first game.
  72. hemmo1986
    Mar 16, 2015
    7
    Being the third entry in this critically acclaimed series it definitely doesn't fail to impress. From the beautiful vistas and solid gun play this is a worthy entry; however while the game has many strong aspects its only downfall is its lack of anything new to offer and somewhat linear game-play.

    Being only six to seven hours in length and considering there's nothing really new from    Being the third entry in this critically acclaimed series it definitely doesn't fail to impress. From the beautiful vistas and solid gun play this is a worthy entry; however while the game has many strong aspects its only downfall is its lack of anything new to offer and somewhat linear game-play.

    Being only six to seven hours in length and considering there's nothing really new from the previous entry, it could be fair to argue that Crysis 3 feels more like a DLC than a completely new game.

    Still if you enjoyed the previous games than Crysis 3 is worth a play through for fans of the series.
    Just make sure you have a high end pc to truly enjoy all it has to offer.    … Expand
  73. Frast2013X
    Aug 24, 2013
    7
    Na 3 część wielkiej marki czekałem z ogromnym zapałem. Po świetnej jedynce i dobrej dwójce spodziewałem się że i trzecia część będzie trzymała wysoki poziom. W Cryteku chyba też tak myśleli. Myśleli ze skoro zrobili swoje poprzednie gry tak dobrze to znaczy że są po prostu...utalentowani i nie muszą wiele siedzieć przy swojej grze żeby wyszła ona dobrze. Crysis 3 nie jest słabą grą, jestNa 3 część wielkiej marki czekałem z ogromnym zapałem. Po świetnej jedynce i dobrej dwójce spodziewałem się że i trzecia część będzie trzymała wysoki poziom. W Cryteku chyba też tak myśleli. Myśleli ze skoro zrobili swoje poprzednie gry tak dobrze to znaczy że są po prostu...utalentowani i nie muszą wiele siedzieć przy swojej grze żeby wyszła ona dobrze. Crysis 3 nie jest słabą grą, jest jednak o wiele słabszy niż jego poprzednicy, wręcz można powiedzieć że w tej chwili jest to najsłabsza gra Cryteku który robi naprawdę świetne gry(większość). Co mi się w trójce nie podoba? Fabuła. Ale tylko w połowie. Chodzi mi tutaj o samo kontynuowanie fabuły po dwójce. Już w dwójce twórcy zaczęli kombinować, wymyślać wirusy które uśmierciły bohaterów jedynki(tych którzy przeżyli), teraz zaczęli kombinować jeszcze bardziej, osoby które wcześniej nie żyły nagle wstały z martwych(tak wiem, jest to przecież "wyjaśnione"..ale jest to po prostu głupie...), nie czuje tego czego dokonałem w dwójce. To tak jakby wszystko poszło na marne..Cepidy znowu są i do tego potężniejsze...a co z tym co zrobiłem w dwójce, nikt nawet nie pamięta jak dużo trzeba było się namęczyć. Nie podoba mi się rozgrywka, oczywiście jest "otwarty świat" ale nie taki jaki obiecywali twórcy. Nie taki jaki mogliśmy zobaczyć w Crysis'ie jedynce, wybór działania też jest taki sobie, nie mówiąc o tym że już od początku walczymy z cepidami(po prostu za mało tutaj walki ze zwykłymi ludźmi).Nie podoba mi się też długość gry, ja sam przeszedłem ją w około 4 godziny, nawet fabuła nie zdążyła się zacząć a już się skończyła. Ostatnią rzeczą taka mi się tutaj nie podoba to bugi które się od czasu do czasu zdarzają i psują rozgrywkę. Przez te minusy widać że 3 była po prostu robiona na szybko,a szkoda bo pomysł był. Najnowszego Crysis'a ratuje na szczęście jeszcze fabuła(ta druga połowa). Gdy grając w jedynkę myślałem o końcu świata związanym z atakiem cepidów to właśnie wyobrażałem sobie coś w stylu Crysis'a 3. Prorok odwala tutaj świetne "przemowy" i niesamowicie ratuje świat. Oczywiście można było to zrobić o wiele lepiej(patrząc na plany dla serii o których mówili twórcy jeszcze przed premierą pierwszej części). Do tego Crysis' 3 jest dość przyjemnym FPS zawierającym pewne elementy jedynki jak i dwójki przez co chociaż trochę gra się w niego przyjemnie. No i na koniec...grafika w 3 jest niesamowita. Szczerze? Przez następne parę lat nic nie pobije(no chyba że 1 na modach) jakości jungli, poruszania się trawy, jakości wybuchów, iskr czy innych elementów występujących w 3. Jest mi jednak smutno że Crytek nie podjął się zrobienia 3 oddzielnie na konsole i oddzielnie na PC, zakładam że wtedy grafika była by jeszcze lepsza. Moja ocena 7/10… Expand
  74. mikhailmaldonag
    Nov 19, 2016
    5
    Game is... just like Crysis 2. Do not use the bow, is totally broken and overpower. You can play un Ultra 1440p at 120-144 most of the time with a 980. So the game looks very nice, graphically. That is why I give a 5 . But in reality game is 4 at most!
  75. Legato
    Jan 8, 2014
    6
    Worst game in trilogy. No more original interesting story, no more atmosphere. Crysis 3 from next-gen sci-fi with original gameplay shooter become a boring copy of previous parts in trilogy. Crysis 3 has only good graphics, but a good game can not be built only on graphics, without story and characters.
  76. Vitrix902
    Dec 31, 2013
    6
    I would have to say that after playing Crysis 2 I was really expecting more. I can Only give this game a six not compared to the other crysis games if I were doing that i would give it a 2. But on it's own it is just a decent game with the same mechanics as crysis 2 which is not bad but they could have improved. And I wont go inot the graphics that much becuase waht else is there to say.I would have to say that after playing Crysis 2 I was really expecting more. I can Only give this game a six not compared to the other crysis games if I were doing that i would give it a 2. But on it's own it is just a decent game with the same mechanics as crysis 2 which is not bad but they could have improved. And I wont go inot the graphics that much becuase waht else is there to say. It does look amazing. But even using a GTX 770 it will still tax my system with Anti Aliasing on all the way up. But it still looks great without AA at 1920x1080. I assume some people could not fully appreciate the GFX becuase of a lower range system. But the story, is for lack of better word, lame. The multiplayer is not as good as Crysis 2 imo. And to top it if it is buggy as hell at least the hunter edtion is. I got two copys of this game the regular and hunter and for some. Hunter does not add any content or weapons as far as I could tell. And I don't know why it is so buggy. I got Hunter Edition for free and kept it because i thought it would be a better PC port. But if you are a first time crysis player and you want the best experience Skip this title and get a previous Crysis title.… Expand
  77. trelocubed
    Dec 7, 2013
    7
    i have to admit that i don't really care about how the graphics looks in any game, so first of all the gameplay! its pretty much the same with the twist of the bow that can really help in higher difficulties, most of the guns from crysis 2 have been imported to crysis 3 so dont expect big change but unlike crysis 2 most of the campaign doesnt feel linear, you can aproach your objectivei have to admit that i don't really care about how the graphics looks in any game, so first of all the gameplay! its pretty much the same with the twist of the bow that can really help in higher difficulties, most of the guns from crysis 2 have been imported to crysis 3 so dont expect big change but unlike crysis 2 most of the campaign doesnt feel linear, you can aproach your objective in different ways, a thing that i really like. unfortunatly the campaign last only for 4 hours on slightly higher difficulty, even less than that in normal difficulty, feels like some of the budget is in the multiplayer.

    sooo.... lets talk about GRAPHICS!
    yes! the visuals are BEAUTIFUL even on the lowest possible settings, thats how next gen game are going to look like, and BTW, you really dont need 8 gigabytes of ram to run that im oly using 2 GB ddr2.    … Expand
  78. Nickolababaiko
    Dec 12, 2021
    7
    Графоний в игре завезли отменный для 2013 года, когда игра вышла! Графон был настолько крут что выглядит неплохо до сих пор (2021 год!!!))
    Я прошел первый Crysis...он так себе(кроме графики)! Crysis 2 прям шедевр, был пройден на одном дыхании! А Crysis 3 ближе к концу игры я проходил через силу! СКУЧНО! Сюжет примитивный, для американских подростков может и норм чтоб их мозг сильно не    Графоний в игре завезли отменный для 2013 года, когда игра вышла! Графон был настолько крут что выглядит неплохо до сих пор (2021 год!!!))
    Я прошел первый Crysis...он так себе(кроме графики)! Crysis 2 прям шедевр, был пройден на одном дыхании! А Crysis 3 ближе к концу игры я проходил через силу! СКУЧНО! Сюжет примитивный, для американских подростков может и норм чтоб их мозг сильно не напрягался! Диалоги в игре детский сад, типа: "ты должен им помочь! Я не могу им помочь потому что я себе помочь не могу!" или "она виновата во всем! Она не виновата, она просто выполняла приказ! Ты такой же как она ты тоже просто выполнял приказы и посмотри скольких нормальных ребят ты загубил!!" Вот подобные диалоги вызывают тупую улыбку....ЧТО?)))))
    Перестрелки однообразные, есть неплохие экшон-постановочные сцены!
    Игра в общем неплоха для 2013 года но скучная и с примитивным сюжетом и диалогами! Вы ничего не потеряете если пройдете мимо Crysis 3! Поиграйте лучше в Crysis2 она достойная!!!    … Expand
  79. JRPGReviewer
    Jan 27, 2014
    7
    Known as the benchmark test for any high end gaming pc, Crysis delivers a stunning visual appeal and some fast paced gameplay. With Psycho returning and the Prophet getting back in the game, the action couldn't get much better. And for the day one bow version purchasers, the bow showed its true potential. So the gameplay is cool and the visuals are godly, but what about the story? For anKnown as the benchmark test for any high end gaming pc, Crysis delivers a stunning visual appeal and some fast paced gameplay. With Psycho returning and the Prophet getting back in the game, the action couldn't get much better. And for the day one bow version purchasers, the bow showed its true potential. So the gameplay is cool and the visuals are godly, but what about the story? For an FPS game, stories are really either really amazing are pretty bad. For Crysis, an incredible story would've made some amazing impacts; even more than it already did. It's story is okay, with the Alpha -Ceph and all . But it wasn't moving and wasn't something to celebrate. It wasn't bad, by it wasn't great either. Of course, if you are looking for a shooting game just to kill, Crysis is a pretty good choice. With cool weapons and new ones, it's a playground of shooting and hiding. Or... Is it ? The gameplay is awesome, but is actually very restricted in some parts. Of course it's not a sandbox game, but it was a little tight in some parts. Not anything to complain about really, as most games cant let players run too freely. So if recommend this to FPS and Crysis fans, but don't go buying it if it's just for the story. Not a bad game, compared to most other FPS games.… Expand
  80. Andante
    Dec 4, 2022
    6
    Crysis 3 takes place in the year 2047 and you play once again as Prophet in a post apocalyptic New York. The idea is pretty good, some environments are beautifuly designed as a mix of tropical and urban environment and the darker mood is exactly what the game needed. Unfortunately the game does the same mistakes like Crysis 2. It is not optimized for the pc, the pacing is mediocre, itCrysis 3 takes place in the year 2047 and you play once again as Prophet in a post apocalyptic New York. The idea is pretty good, some environments are beautifuly designed as a mix of tropical and urban environment and the darker mood is exactly what the game needed. Unfortunately the game does the same mistakes like Crysis 2. It is not optimized for the pc, the pacing is mediocre, it saves automatically only in checkpoints, it has console mechanics,
    it is very linear and the level design makes the game tedious. I really cannot count how many times I reloaded to manage to play through some sections in the game....and this wasnt fun at all. The story was ok and I liked the addition of Psycho. Graphics were very good but not like in Crysis 1.....If you liked Crysis 2 you probably will like this too.    … Expand
  81. Hack
    Aug 3, 2017
    6
    Visually stunning but that really is the only high point of the game, the combat is average, the voice acting is average (apart from Pyscho who was great) and the performance is shaky at best, even 4 years after release, plus after killing the final boss my game crashed and continued to crash so I had to watch the last 7 minutes on Youtube, after checking Google it turns out this is aVisually stunning but that really is the only high point of the game, the combat is average, the voice acting is average (apart from Pyscho who was great) and the performance is shaky at best, even 4 years after release, plus after killing the final boss my game crashed and continued to crash so I had to watch the last 7 minutes on Youtube, after checking Google it turns out this is a common issue with no fix. It's unbelievable this was never fixed and it has left me with a sour taste in my mouth.… Expand
  82. Tomle1202
    Apr 5, 2018
    7
    Although Crysis 3 does bring about some positive changes to its core under the gorgeousness of New York 2.0, it is not enough to deliver something more spectacular than mediocrity.
  83. jelikey
    Sep 10, 2015
    7
    Awesome game!Greatest graphics and various gameplay.
    Crysis series continued with prophet and Psycho.Most wonderful art design for levels and great lighting effect,very good textures,awesome dx11 effects and solid gameplay.
    Welcome to next gen fps by crytek.
  84. Frenetik
    Nov 3, 2016
    6
    The last game in the series is also the weakest one. The story has too much melodrama for my taste and the campaign lasted only 4 hours even on the hard difficulty with all the side missions done.
  85. TheMace
    Dec 10, 2015
    7
    I've played all the Crysis games and have loved all of them. My main complaint no the last 2 is how short the games are. I finished Crysis 2 and Crysis 3 in 5 hours. While I could crank up the difficulty (I usually play games like this on normal), the overall game isnt that long. There is a ton of amazing content, graphics, etc. The bots are fairly intelligent and I thoroughly loved the 5I've played all the Crysis games and have loved all of them. My main complaint no the last 2 is how short the games are. I finished Crysis 2 and Crysis 3 in 5 hours. While I could crank up the difficulty (I usually play games like this on normal), the overall game isnt that long. There is a ton of amazing content, graphics, etc. The bots are fairly intelligent and I thoroughly loved the 5 hours. I could use a few less cut scenes and more play. I would have been much happier with the game if it was about 3x longer.… Expand
  86. Detraxxx
    Feb 16, 2017
    7
    Really, I mean REALLY outstanding graphics, short, but intense campaign, average multiplayer and very poor AI. Game mechanics are almost identical to Crysis 2, the game lacks innovation. 7/10 in overall.
  87. Dco326
    Apr 9, 2023
    7
    Bolje od dvojke ali def i dalje nedovoljno dobro, iskreno malo me je i razocarala jebiga...
  88. nomad1326
    Apr 23, 2023
    5
    This game from Crytek has a lot of problems with combat systems and even visual part. Combat system is weak and poor for vertical gameplay, for example. Visual part is very noisy. Plot (story) is... standard. And direction doesn't have any new or nothing that can surprise the player. General design is poor as well.
  89. Gelaos
    Jul 12, 2021
    6
    I played Crysis 3 just to conclude the trilogy story. Beautiful graphics. That's it. The rest is Crysis 2 all over - linear levels, "meh" storyline, generic FPS gameplay combined with a cool supersuit. Nothing more, nothing less.
  90. Kotofon
    Jun 7, 2020
    6
    События в данной части будут происходить спустя несколько десятков лет после первой катастрофы в Тихом океане, но геймплей обещает остаться таким же: по-прежнему можно отдать должное защитному нанокостюму, который позволит уничтожать неприятелей как в старые добрые времена. Нанокостюм позволяет коже твердеть и превращаться в непробиваемую бронь, делать главного героя невидимкой или дажеСобытия в данной части будут происходить спустя несколько десятков лет после первой катастрофы в Тихом океане, но геймплей обещает остаться таким же: по-прежнему можно отдать должное защитному нанокостюму, который позволит уничтожать неприятелей как в старые добрые времена. Нанокостюм позволяет коже твердеть и превращаться в непробиваемую бронь, делать главного героя невидимкой или даже изменять показатели скорости и силы.… Expand
  91. Cz3rw0ny
    Feb 10, 2021
    5
    As a long time Crysis fan, this part was the first where I haven't seen credits rolling. The setting, narrow maps and lack of any story in which I would be at least remotely interested is a big no. The graphics fine, they were good, but the styling and gameplay is a downside in my opinion.
  92. Soullex
    Nov 29, 2022
    6
    Lan yeni bir şey yapsaydınız zahmet olcak ama..............................
  93. matdimond
    Aug 10, 2019
    6
    ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  94. r03vg
    Apr 15, 2020
    6
    Приятная графика и очень харизматичные персонажи. Сюжет пустой, лук бесполезен, стелс не работает.
  95. ChesterField
    May 12, 2020
    7
    We are all agree that visuals and graphics are outstanding. Now, they should bring open world to this franchise like they did in the first one. Game is very short and the story is not much than a regular one. This saga is not ageing well.
  96. hileger
    Oct 19, 2022
    6
    Кризис есть кризис херня стрельба, крутой графон ,короткий сюжет как мой член.
  97. MrPajamas
    Mar 12, 2021
    7
    Crysis did something incredible then in 2007, namely graphics, which did not have much competition at that time. At that time, Crytek served us a beautiful-looking FPS game with a great story and openness. In addition to the Warhead data disc, a full-fledged sequel to Crysis 2 was released a few years later, which disappointed many people with its closedness, because what made the numberCrysis did something incredible then in 2007, namely graphics, which did not have much competition at that time. At that time, Crytek served us a beautiful-looking FPS game with a great story and openness. In addition to the Warhead data disc, a full-fledged sequel to Crysis 2 was released a few years later, which disappointed many people with its closedness, because what made the number one game just as great was the openness and several ways to deal with enemas. The two no longer had this option, but on the one hand it offered us a new environment in the form of the city, which was great. But now back to Crysis 3. The reason why I briefly described the previous two parts was because I would now like to compare them. One and two are great games for me, because each offered us something a little different. Where Crysis 3 is lagging behind is something new. The graphics are beautiful, yes, but it's not such a leap as it was a double. The environment was ... just saying that. A smaller mix of one and two. Here and there some grassy parts resembling an island from number one and here and there skyscrapers with a touch of the city from number two. The combination is quite good, but nothing new. The nano-outfit technologies were already quite impoverished in the duo, although I understand the authors' intention to make the game easier by controlling, especially on the console. I myself am a console player who prefers to take the gamepad almost everywhere. I say it everywhere, because FPS games or strategies according to them are simply a matter of keyboard and mouse. The story here is good, although in my opinion it does not surpass the previous ones and for example such a Prophet seemed unsympathetic to me, but that is purely my opinion. Game time is, I would say, for 5 hours, but this is usually the case with shooters. The game basically does what the second one does, it just doesn't add anything new. So if you liked the previous parts, then I think that Crysis 3 is a sure choice for you. For me, a good game that I recommend.… Expand
  98. BenzoSt
    Jul 12, 2022
    6
    Although the graphics and scenery are magnificent, Crysis 3 isn’t consistently fun to play. I blame this largely on the inclusion of a special bow and arrow that you can fire while using the Cloak mode of your Nanosuit. This cloak-and-bow combination is simply overpowered in most parts of the campaign. The campaign is also significantly shorter than it was in Crysis 2, and the story isAlthough the graphics and scenery are magnificent, Crysis 3 isn’t consistently fun to play. I blame this largely on the inclusion of a special bow and arrow that you can fire while using the Cloak mode of your Nanosuit. This cloak-and-bow combination is simply overpowered in most parts of the campaign. The campaign is also significantly shorter than it was in Crysis 2, and the story is also a bit nonsensical, although your sidekick "Psycho" is pretty cool. Overall, I feel like this game could have been great if only Crytek playtested this game thoroughly and added a few more levels.… Expand
  99. Axelle_1
    Sep 6, 2021
    5
    копирка 2 части но зато есть лук.......
    сомнительный проект
  100. siyahgece05
    May 5, 2021
    7
    the first 5 hours was fine but then slowly i got bored the game went to waste could have been better!
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

100
#100 Best PC Game of 2013
36
#36 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
15
#15 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
76

Generally favorable reviews - based on 47 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 47
  2. Mixed: 18 out of 47
  3. Negative: 0 out of 47
  1. PC Master (Greece)
    Jun 10, 2013
    92
    You are an enhanced super-soldier, the ultimate killing machine developed through nanotechnology, and that fact is fleshed out during gameplay- you can do all the things that you would expect you could do. [April 2013]
  2. DarkStation
    Apr 15, 2013
    60
    While it is technically the best version of Crysis out there, it is really only a slightly better version of Crysis 2’s mechanics and graphics. Because of that, Crysis 3 feels more like an expansion pack to Crysis 2 than a true sequel and more than likely not worth your time.
    Read full review
  3. PC PowerPlay
    Mar 30, 2013
    70
    A series we're glad to see come to a close. But if you like games with HEAPS of graphics, or for the multiplayer. [Apr 2013, p.82]
See all critic reviews »