Crown of Glory: Europe in the Age of Napoleon

 PC
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 4 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 4
  3. Negative: 0 out of 4
  1. IGN
    80
    The different playable nations and the vagaries of diplomacy ensure that there's plenty enough reason for fans to come back again and again.
  2. Worth Playing
    75
    Crown of Glory is a gem in the modern landscape of first-person shooters and 3D normal-mapped, vertex-shaded graphics. It may not be the prettiest of titles, but it is certainly a deep strategy game that combines both the empire building and turn-based combat styles into a brilliant title based in the era of Napoleon.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
8.4

Generally favorable reviews- based on 7 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 7
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 7
  3. Negative: 1 out of 7
  1. MikeW.
    Nov 14, 2007
    10
    There are very few games that in truth i really go back to playing after long breaks playing more recent titles. Crown of glory is one of the There are very few games that in truth i really go back to playing after long breaks playing more recent titles. Crown of glory is one of the few, it really is fantastic value. Matrix games have a number of patches available to improve stability but still havn't solved all issues, particularly multiplayer ones. It has a steep learning curve but like many matrix titles once you get the hang of it you will get many hours of enjoyment from playing the game.… Full Review »
  2. BarryJ.
    Jan 19, 2007
    9
    Highly detailed Napoleonic game with a high learning curve. Immerses gamer in virtually every aspect of Napoleonic warfare and is a must for Highly detailed Napoleonic game with a high learning curve. Immerses gamer in virtually every aspect of Napoleonic warfare and is a must for the serious strategy gamer. Arcade gamers looking for pretty graphics and sound should look elsewhere.… Full Review »
  3. CarsonZ.
    Oct 15, 2005
    9
    Highly detailed, a little bit inaccurate, sometimes vague.
See all user reviews »