User Score
3.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 14 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 14
  2. Negative: 7 out of 14

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Jul 17, 2013
    0
    payment system works mostly not
    - After 1,5 years still a lot of bugs (upgrade of buildings or units not working)
    - EA Policy flawed with use of scripts, no list what can or not (result lots of bans) - Totally not hack free - Development isn't going anywhere no new features instead stupid useless unit upgrades - Unbalanced, first join is 90% chance of first win or biggest alliance -
    payment system works mostly not
    - After 1,5 years still a lot of bugs (upgrade of buildings or units not working)
    - EA Policy flawed with use of scripts, no list what can or not (result lots of bans)
    - Totally not hack free
    - Development isn't going anywhere no new features instead stupid useless unit upgrades
    - Unbalanced, first join is 90% chance of first win or biggest alliance
    - Mostly automated support

    So what we are used of EA, bugs bugs bugs, lots of promises but none have been worked out whatsoever
    This could be a very nice free to play game if the would listen to the players and not focusing on the EA easy money policy.
    We must admit that EA isn't really delivering high profile games anymore, mostly all flawed/bugged/not well balanced.

    They promised to build a new development team, after firing the whole 60 development team behind this game. I would keep my hands off it until this is resolved, you can give it a try but after a week it gets a bit boring and don't put any money in the game, lot of players I played with on different worlds have been banned with the reason "Use of third party scripts/software"
    Expand
  2. Jun 25, 2015
    0
    I'm a dedicated C&C fan and love there content but when EA launched this I had to say it was a poor idea the game is one of those mobile long term waiting games and with cheap designs they didn't even make a new game off it they just took the 3rd game and turned it into a mobile cruddy game. I would prefer playing a shooter that's more fast paced then what EA shoved out to make money II'm a dedicated C&C fan and love there content but when EA launched this I had to say it was a poor idea the game is one of those mobile long term waiting games and with cheap designs they didn't even make a new game off it they just took the 3rd game and turned it into a mobile cruddy game. I would prefer playing a shooter that's more fast paced then what EA shoved out to make money I played it to see if you can at least have good combat but no its turn based like a fantasy game or card game that's not a fair fight then there's no sneak attacks or other fighting styles you can use i'm sorry but this game should't be out it has trashed the good name of Command and Conquer and stomped on it. EA needs to go back to C&C's roots and focus on that and fix there problem don't get on the cruddy mobile gaming that's not gonna give you dedicated gamer's that want to see your new content. EA you need to fix this before you lose all your dedicated C&C fans Expand
  3. Mar 15, 2016
    0
    Like was written before me, tons of bugs, part of which can be easily fixed. But almost nothing was done from 2012.

    Donate kills interest. With donating you haven't think much and grow in optimal way.

    Tons of reports about of cheaters, but only few of them were banned/deleted.
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 1 Critic Review

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 1
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 1
  3. Negative: 1 out of 1
  1. Feb 20, 2013
    20
    It's free, sure, but that doesn't mean it's good.