User Score
7.7

Generally favorable reviews- based on 972 Ratings

User score distribution:

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Nov 12, 2012
    6
    The game is the same free mod Age of Chivalry except now it's on the UT3 engine. It has slightly better graphics, some added combat features, and more weapons. The game is VERY buggy as of writing this and the game is its beta stage - It's not a polished product. The combat is pretty decent but it feels slow and clunky compared to Age of Chivalry. Combat seems to favour attack spam moreThe game is the same free mod Age of Chivalry except now it's on the UT3 engine. It has slightly better graphics, some added combat features, and more weapons. The game is VERY buggy as of writing this and the game is its beta stage - It's not a polished product. The combat is pretty decent but it feels slow and clunky compared to Age of Chivalry. Combat seems to favour attack spam more than accurate controlled hits and blocking/dodging. A lot of times due to bugs/lag or just flawed game mechanics combat is inaccurately depicted on your screen - Things like players blocking with shield before it's equipped and shown in their hand or someone parry/blocking an attack an no parry/blocking animation is shown or player's hitting you without facing you - stuff like that. Anyway it's not a horrible game and for $25 bucks it's pretty decent. If the dev team fixes all the bugs and issues like they say then I would give it a 8/10. Expand
  2. Oct 23, 2012
    10
    Amazing game, fun in every single way (except archery maybe). Buy it without a doubt, it will give you 50 hours minimum worth of fun multiplayer times.
  3. Apr 26, 2013
    1
    The most annoying game I've ever played.
    Only two class rule the servers (vanguard, knight), archer is so lame I cant see far just 50m, cant kick with bow I can't block with bow, the weapon change is really slow...
    I can't block some attack with secondary weapon.
    This game is sucks, waste of my money.
  4. Oct 19, 2012
    10
    Amazing game. The combat seems simple but there is so much strategy and depth to the melee system, more so than any other similar medieval slasher. Unlike war of the roses, the combat doesn't feel floaty and light, each blow feels powerful and heavy. The objective modes are incredibly fun and unique, and there is a strong need for teamwork. Also the decapitations are freaking cool :D JustAmazing game. The combat seems simple but there is so much strategy and depth to the melee system, more so than any other similar medieval slasher. Unlike war of the roses, the combat doesn't feel floaty and light, each blow feels powerful and heavy. The objective modes are incredibly fun and unique, and there is a strong need for teamwork. Also the decapitations are freaking cool :D Just buy the game already. Expand
  5. Oct 22, 2012
    9
    Unique game and a good time. I waited a couple days before purchasing because I was skeptical. The WotR and MnB people made like the game was awful. I waited until just before totalbiscuit posted his video in which he gives Chivalry a slight advantage to WotR. I am glad that I bought it - it is very fun to even play against the bots for practice. I highly recommend the tutorial and playingUnique game and a good time. I waited a couple days before purchasing because I was skeptical. The WotR and MnB people made like the game was awful. I waited until just before totalbiscuit posted his video in which he gives Chivalry a slight advantage to WotR. I am glad that I bought it - it is very fun to even play against the bots for practice. I highly recommend the tutorial and playing against bots 1v1 to make sure you learn the mechanics.

    After you get rolling in this game, it is hard to stop. 1v1 with another real player is where this game truly shines.

    I am looking forward to more updates for some minor bug fixes, content, and UI improvements.
    Expand
  6. Nov 15, 2012
    3
    Poor, simplified Mount&Blade clone. Does nothing better than its role model. If you're interested in the subject, buy M&B instead. If you already have it, don't waste your money on Chivalry. You'll get nothing out of it.
  7. Oct 19, 2012
    10
    Finally a fun fps style game. It's been a while since I've played a game that was fun like this. This was made by a small group of people so that's probably why it plays so well as compared to big company made games. The blood, and guts are awesome, and I love playing the archer character for a challenge.
  8. Oct 20, 2012
    10
    Epic amazing game. A MUST BUY

    LOVE IT

    The combat is better than any other melee game I've played. its hard to believe this is from an indie studio. If you like fast paced, smart, melee combat, this game is for you.
  9. Oct 17, 2012
    9
    After M&B and WOTR, this game nailed the Melee combat system, the learning curve is very short, it is easy to control you character with all the movement and blocking, and in very few hours you can be decent player in MP, but with all those simple control you can do many things and tricks and the combat will look even better with skilled player, more realistic and as the developers saidAfter M&B and WOTR, this game nailed the Melee combat system, the learning curve is very short, it is easy to control you character with all the movement and blocking, and in very few hours you can be decent player in MP, but with all those simple control you can do many things and tricks and the combat will look even better with skilled player, more realistic and as the developers said Hollywood realistic. They just deliver what they promised 100% the weapons variety is just amazing and very balanced, you will enjoy mastering each weapon in the game, the classes are so different from each other yet they are balanced. Graphics, sounds and overall feel of the game is just stunning for such an Indy game, for sure it beats the other competitors in term of these, I am sure that the game will last very long time live with a lot of player and supported community, I hope all the success for the developers for future add-on/ games. I gave the game 9 cause there are still some area of improvement, and I am sure the developers will make most of them very soon. If you you like 1st person MP, medieval combat or melee style in general get this game with no hesitation, for it is price I ensure it will deliver you 100% satisfaction. Expand
  10. Oct 18, 2012
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I think this is one of the best game of the year. It is very tactical and team based. At first its very hard but after 20 games you can really good play it.:D Expand
  11. Oct 19, 2012
    8
    The fact that this game is indie should not be a factor in your purchase. The fact is this game delivers on it's promises to create one hell of a realistic experience. The graphics are beautiful, far beyond what an indie studio should be able to produce on such a small budget. The game play is good, but it's not great. There needs to be tweaking done to balance the weapons, and someThe fact that this game is indie should not be a factor in your purchase. The fact is this game delivers on it's promises to create one hell of a realistic experience. The graphics are beautiful, far beyond what an indie studio should be able to produce on such a small budget. The game play is good, but it's not great. There needs to be tweaking done to balance the weapons, and some upgrades to the hit box system would be nice. However all of the flaws are minor, for the most part it works how you would expect it to work. The maps are well designed, however you can get stuck on seemingly non-existing rocks or invisible walls from time to time.

    Conclusion: The game is good for what it is, those who expected more shouldn't play a combat game based around such a simple time. Everything works, it runs smooth, and there are no huge balance issues. It can only get better from here. I rate the game an 8, as no game is perfect, and this game has it's flaws. It is indie after all.
    Expand
  12. Oct 25, 2012
    9
    People need to stop bashing Chivalry when they play War of the Roses and vice versa.
    This game is completely different from War of the Roses as it originated from Mount and Blade: Warband
    and this game came from the hl2 mod Age of Chivalry. Why i prefer Chivalry over Wotr is the intensity of the combat and the simple but addicting unlock system, although the system in Wotr is very nice
    People need to stop bashing Chivalry when they play War of the Roses and vice versa.
    This game is completely different from War of the Roses as it originated from Mount and Blade: Warband
    and this game came from the hl2 mod Age of Chivalry. Why i prefer Chivalry over Wotr is the intensity of the combat and the simple but addicting unlock system, although the system in Wotr is very nice too, it doesn't
    really fit the genre. People complaining about the animations haven't played it enough, sure they could use some updating because they aren't really smooth but they are still very nice. Even though Wotr has more weapons, the weapons in chivalry feel more unique, and i have more of a gotta catch em all feel than in Wotr. Regardless they are both great games but i prefer Chivalry. (Also because it's first person.)

    P.S. please fix javelins, they are severely underpowered.
    Expand
  13. Oct 31, 2012
    10
    The most epic game this year .
    The melee combat as you never saw it before .
    It is almost like you are there , extremely imersive atmosphere . Recomend it .
  14. Nov 1, 2012
    9
    This game has just about everything I have ever looked for in a game. It's beautiful, challenging, complex, original, and an absolute thrill to play. This is the first game that has ever evoked a genuine sense of blood lust inside of me, that is how visceral the experience can be. This is my surprise Game of the Year.
  15. Jan 25, 2013
    4
    The game suffers from the same problems as the free source mod plus a few more. The animations of weapons swung are off from what is actually connecting. You will see someone pull back to take a swing and take damage the same instance before their swing or thrust displays as connecting. Unlike the free mod, you will get stuck on stationary objects and the movement in the game doesn'tThe game suffers from the same problems as the free source mod plus a few more. The animations of weapons swung are off from what is actually connecting. You will see someone pull back to take a swing and take damage the same instance before their swing or thrust displays as connecting. Unlike the free mod, you will get stuck on stationary objects and the movement in the game doesn't compensate for this at all.

    Plus there is a whole host of bugs including throw-able weapons 'breaking' so they don't won't work anymore. I also experienced the chat system breaking.

    This isn't really the game or the company's fault, but the game attracts a lot of children who haven't hit puberty yet, so get ready for squeaky voices over the built in voice chat.
    Expand
  16. Nov 27, 2012
    9
    The worst thing about this game would be the buggy tutorial. After that it is pretty much pure fun. Someone with no fps background at all (like me) will find the hard to master bit very true, but anyone who likes the idea of fps style gameplay with swords could not go wrong with this title.
  17. Nov 10, 2012
    8
    this game is a fun little stop gap till M&B2, after the disappointment of war of the roses, i like some of the different features compared to M&B, for instance you cant constantly hold your block/parry once its been hit (sadly no directional block), adding couching to melee, great idea,nothing beats sprinting around with a spear and stabbing people, along with the deployable pavise forthis game is a fun little stop gap till M&B2, after the disappointment of war of the roses, i like some of the different features compared to M&B, for instance you cant constantly hold your block/parry once its been hit (sadly no directional block), adding couching to melee, great idea,nothing beats sprinting around with a spear and stabbing people, along with the deployable pavise for crossbows, its also enjoyable watching someone get impaled into the spike pillar in the arena, they got the decapitation/dismemberment just right, not too in your face "finish him" style, it just happens, arms and heads come off and you move on. Expand
  18. Aug 19, 2013
    1
    Enjoyed this game in the beginning but it has turned into a Vanguard left mouse button spamming fest. The Vanguard class is too powerful and torn banner ignore calls for it to be balanced. I've deleted this game and will never play it again.
  19. Jul 25, 2013
    6
    As much as I want to like this game, the frustrating parts of it really kill the fun of the game.

    first off, the idea is solid, it just was half-implemented. melee combat is interesting and they did add a little bit of depth into it, but it is far from being a well done combat system at all. beware of MANY issues with the combat, the biggest being lag, they have not addressed lag
    As much as I want to like this game, the frustrating parts of it really kill the fun of the game.

    first off, the idea is solid, it just was half-implemented. melee combat is interesting and they did add a little bit of depth into it, but it is far from being a well done combat system at all.

    beware of MANY issues with the combat, the biggest being lag, they have not addressed lag well enough, as a melee game is extremely intense and you MUST have split second control over your attacks. the lag in this game makes it VERY hard to properly land hits and block. not just that but many times, when you try to swing your weapon, it takes half a second for your character to actually start swinging, the input lag is variable, it can vary from no problem to holy crap, why is my guy acting so retarded? SWING THE DAMNED SWORD YOU STUPID IDIOT!

    I dont like how they implemented the level unlocks, it is completely UNnecessary, and it ruins the balance. there seem to be weapons that are just plain WAY better than the others, and you often see very high level players only using those.

    also, when it comes to parrying attacks, its a crapshot, sometimes the game lets you, other times it just decides to let the enemy's attack through, almost always ending up with you getting 1-shotted. not just that but the damage system seems a little out of whack, I remember getting 1-shotted many times while I had my TOWER shield up against the enemy, then they proceed to 1-shot me with a dagger... WHAT?!?

    This game is a buggy and laggy mess, I can see what they wanted to do with it, but the execution was sub-par, leaving many major issues that really kill the fun in the game.

    oh, one last thing, DONT TRY TO REBIND YOUR KEYS! it doesnt work... It will not rebind mouse buttons properly after the first setup, so if you choose something for your extra mouse buttons, its permanent, you cant change it.
    Expand
  20. Nov 26, 2012
    10
    This game gets an easy 10. Why? Because no company in the right mind would attempt a game like this unless you are crazy indie developer. 1. This game is difficult to make period. No big company wants to take that kind of risk they would rather give you the same FPS they have been giving you for last 10 years. Again why? Because we morons keep giving them the money to continue the insanityThis game gets an easy 10. Why? Because no company in the right mind would attempt a game like this unless you are crazy indie developer. 1. This game is difficult to make period. No big company wants to take that kind of risk they would rather give you the same FPS they have been giving you for last 10 years. Again why? Because we morons keep giving them the money to continue the insanity and I include myself in supporting this stupidity. 2.. Gameplay is 1st to these developers everything else is secondary. Wild thought process having fun is the main focus of a game. 3. They listen to their community and keep us updated on all game progress. Say what? That Expand
  21. Jan 26, 2013
    5
    Don't tell me this is a good game: I geve it 5 only because i consider it quite... "indie", but if it were a standard game, I would have gave it 3 or 4. 1. The gameplay consists in a mish-mash of blades and spears, where you only have to slash everyone that came near you or you find uncovered (your teammates are among them); 2. It is difficult to make tactics if you are sourrounded: youDon't tell me this is a good game: I geve it 5 only because i consider it quite... "indie", but if it were a standard game, I would have gave it 3 or 4. 1. The gameplay consists in a mish-mash of blades and spears, where you only have to slash everyone that came near you or you find uncovered (your teammates are among them); 2. It is difficult to make tactics if you are sourrounded: you are dead; 3. With these features, all melee virtuosoty become useless: just find an enemy overwhelmed and kill him.
    I don't want to criticize the graphic too much: it is simply too heavy for his performance.
    I also found the translation into my main lenguage quite bad and unfinished.
    Expand
  22. May 23, 2013
    9
    The game is the one of the best I've ever had, and I actualy play more than BF3, or other big games.
    It's very good, and it's not very easy to play, than you will have different levels of duels while playing multiplayer.
    I would pay $50 or more for it. The producers are always trying to make the game better, and releasing new game content. The only bad is that you can see some bugs,
    The game is the one of the best I've ever had, and I actualy play more than BF3, or other big games.
    It's very good, and it's not very easy to play, than you will have different levels of duels while playing multiplayer.
    I would pay $50 or more for it. The producers are always trying to make the game better, and releasing new game content. The only bad is that you can see some bugs, 'cause its and Indie game.
    Expand
  23. Nov 4, 2013
    9
    This is possibly the most fun I've ever had in a multiplayer game. $24.99 is a steal. It's so much fun. The visuals are stunning as well. The sun is the most beautiful sun I've seen in a game. The gameplay is fantastic and it's always fun to cut a person's head off while battle-crying.
  24. Oct 18, 2012
    9
    Chivalry is what War of the Roses could and should have been. As a Veteran Mount & Blade: Warband gamer, I was looking for a fast-paced, skill-based multiplayer experience. I bought into War of the Roses hoping it would be the spiritual successor to Warband, but the melee in WotR is horribly clunky and the "realistic" armor modeling means that certain classes are invincible againstChivalry is what War of the Roses could and should have been. As a Veteran Mount & Blade: Warband gamer, I was looking for a fast-paced, skill-based multiplayer experience. I bought into War of the Roses hoping it would be the spiritual successor to Warband, but the melee in WotR is horribly clunky and the "realistic" armor modeling means that certain classes are invincible against others. In other aspects WotR has no realism at all, having an arcade "tackle" mechanic and spawning players immediately into battles.

    Chivalry fixes all of these problems. Combat is 100% skill-based. Although there's no "directional" attacking and blocking a la Warband and WotR, blocks must be timed perfectly and cannot be held infinitely. The graphics -- with dismemberment! -- and audio are superior for an indie studio, with the right touches of humor thrown in for a multiplayer red vs. blue game that doesn't need to take its lore overly seriously. The minor problems in Chivalry at the moment which keep it from a perfect score, like poor VOIP and no coded team balancing, should be worked out soon according to developers on the forums. Looking forward to playing this game for a very long time.
    Expand
  25. Oct 27, 2012
    8
    Lots of fun, not as polished as War of the roses but has more content and multiplayer modes including killing peasants for points lol. War of the roses for 1 on 1 battles and this for multiplayer skirmishes.
  26. Jan 30, 2013
    0
    Really bad game. Clunky, slow, unresponsive button mashing removing as many teammates as foes with choppy wild swings from an overpowered glitchy weapon.
  27. Dec 25, 2012
    0
    I intentionally got this over War of the Roses, hoping it would be better.

    I guessed wrong. It's horribly slow and unpredictable. Incredibly stale if I don't at least spice it up with some micspam.
  28. Oct 9, 2014
    0
    Can you believe that after four years of beta, this game might actually be worse than what they started with? If you didn't like what consoles did to Call of Duty, you can find more of the same in this game. This game STILL has bugs galore, and it is now being altered to drastically in time for an Xbox/Playstation release. They have nerfed the archer class to the point of completeCan you believe that after four years of beta, this game might actually be worse than what they started with? If you didn't like what consoles did to Call of Duty, you can find more of the same in this game. This game STILL has bugs galore, and it is now being altered to drastically in time for an Xbox/Playstation release. They have nerfed the archer class to the point of complete uselessness, and the death knell for the class came over two patches AFTER they released data showing the archer class was already by far the least played class in the game. Presumably all in an attempt to create a fair environment for consoles and "auto-aim". Amazing concept marred by inept, amateur developer that lacks the resources to create a separate gaming experience on console and pc. Expand
  29. Mar 11, 2013
    4
    The worst problem I have with this game is that it is far too glitchy. Hit detection is horrible, blocking doesn't work sometimes, and when you hit an enemy that is attacking, it may or may not cancel his attack, even though it's supposed to. Some of the missions are unfair as one of the teams spawn at the end of the map while the other spawns right next to the objective. Spamming rightThe worst problem I have with this game is that it is far too glitchy. Hit detection is horrible, blocking doesn't work sometimes, and when you hit an enemy that is attacking, it may or may not cancel his attack, even though it's supposed to. Some of the missions are unfair as one of the teams spawn at the end of the map while the other spawns right next to the objective. Spamming right mouse button to block when being attacked is a common reaction, however if you press it more than one time during any part of your block, you will immediately block right after that. Some weapons are unbalanced, but that's to be expected of any game. I'm not saying the whole game is bad, though. The soundtrack is one of the best I've ever heard, better than the music that large companies make. The voice acting is handled professionally, and the missions are creative and fun like blowing up ships or breaking down medieval gates. The graphics are beautiful, depending on your settings, however the controls could be improved a little bit. Since this game is still in beta, I'll leave this 4 right here, but who knows what the future holds for this game? Expand
  30. Dec 23, 2012
    4
    I like the concept, I really do, but the controls are clunky, the hit detection is terrible, and most matches wind up being a melee of people swinging wildly, killing as many of their own team as the enemy. The graphics and atmosphere are good for an indie game, but that's really all I can praise it for.
  31. Jan 14, 2013
    4
    I really wanted to like this game. It has all the traits that make for a great hack and slasher, but the end result falls so sadly short. I like a lot of the ideas behind it, but they're executed so poor at times that I feel as if I'm not even playing a finished game. The game seems to encourage spamming rather than tactics, and there are several exploitable weapons that cannot be beaten,I really wanted to like this game. It has all the traits that make for a great hack and slasher, but the end result falls so sadly short. I like a lot of the ideas behind it, but they're executed so poor at times that I feel as if I'm not even playing a finished game. The game seems to encourage spamming rather than tactics, and there are several exploitable weapons that cannot be beaten, not to mention the mass unbalance with the classes. This leads to the game getting extremely frustrating as enemies beat you using the cheapest tactics, rather than experiment with new ones and have fun. At 25 dollars, this is a better frustration software than a game, much to my disappointment.. Expand
  32. Jan 27, 2013
    7
    A unique and creative experience. The entire idea of a medieval based combat world is a great idea and it was certainly well executed. The problem is the ability to win with the old hack and slash strategy. Regardless of how high your skill level is, there will always be some people interrupting a battle slashing away randomly and getting an ungodly high score. It's incredibly easy toA unique and creative experience. The entire idea of a medieval based combat world is a great idea and it was certainly well executed. The problem is the ability to win with the old hack and slash strategy. Regardless of how high your skill level is, there will always be some people interrupting a battle slashing away randomly and getting an ungodly high score. It's incredibly easy to counter this on a solo fight, but in FFAs and anything higher than 2v1, it's impossible. Still that's in the hands of the players and not the fault of the game. The game just lacks replay value. I'm not very fond of playing this very often because it's not the most appealing thing I've ever played. It gets dull rather quickly and I'm only motivated to play every once in a while. Expand
  33. Nov 25, 2012
    9
    If you want a medieval fps, this is the game for you. I wasn't sure at the start because you have to practice a bit with those controls and to learn the time it takes to swing your weapon, but finally, I'm doing great and I'm level 24. It's a bit like team fortress where you customize your warrior after choosing between 4 classes. Now, there is veteran helmets, and the game is constantlyIf you want a medieval fps, this is the game for you. I wasn't sure at the start because you have to practice a bit with those controls and to learn the time it takes to swing your weapon, but finally, I'm doing great and I'm level 24. It's a bit like team fortress where you customize your warrior after choosing between 4 classes. Now, there is veteran helmets, and the game is constantly in development, so you can hope for everything in the future. Buy it but don't spam click in game! You can use your mouse wheel and f to do some other attacks! I bought it when it came out and it's worth the full price, so you don't have any excuses if it's in special! Expand
  34. Nov 22, 2012
    9
    What, a game is supposed to be fun, right? So, here goes a 9. It has the action, the good and bad emotions that are necessary to make you laugh and cry like a baby.

    It does need improvements, but the dev team seems reasonable and eager to improve the game (that is an indie, recently launched).
  35. Nov 24, 2012
    8
    Hands down one of the best first person games out there. Though without a campaign i was left somewhat disappointed, but I then realized the real jewel was the multiplayer. ALL THE HACK AND SLASH! The gameplay was simply outstanding and amazing. Although there were graphical flaws (such as the fact that half my sword was gone ) but aside that the game play experience was amazing and theHands down one of the best first person games out there. Though without a campaign i was left somewhat disappointed, but I then realized the real jewel was the multiplayer. ALL THE HACK AND SLASH! The gameplay was simply outstanding and amazing. Although there were graphical flaws (such as the fact that half my sword was gone ) but aside that the game play experience was amazing and the fact that Chivalry stays away from all the other first person games in terms of weaponry as games such as Call of Duty, Battlefield , Medal of Honor etc. are being repetitive with all this shooting. Honestly after transitioning from Guns to swords I think i would prefer swords because there's more action up close. Expand
  36. Dec 30, 2012
    8
    good game, the reason why 8/10 because the community is so bad, everyone thinks he is a hero with clicking only the left button of his mouse and the reason of this = too many teamkills but no punishment for left-clicking heroes
  37. Feb 21, 2013
    7
    When the servers work, this game can be a lot of fun. There is still a lot of balancing to be done. Also, with modes like free for all, the frustration levels can climb very quickly. What is nice though is the tutorial, which gives you a quick overview of the keys and general game mechanics. Tbe melee fighting is pretty fun, but as I have never really played another melee game, I don'tWhen the servers work, this game can be a lot of fun. There is still a lot of balancing to be done. Also, with modes like free for all, the frustration levels can climb very quickly. What is nice though is the tutorial, which gives you a quick overview of the keys and general game mechanics. Tbe melee fighting is pretty fun, but as I have never really played another melee game, I don't have anything to judge it again. Worth the money if you have a few friends playing it. Expand
  38. Jan 26, 2013
    2
    It's very sloppy. The combat is frequently silly, and doesn't require very much skill. The concept is amazing, but everything feels they tried to copy Halflife 2's crowbar-action and came up lacking. The games amusing, but I could have done with more Demon Souls/Dark Souls action where I felt like I was in control. Plus from the two hours I played (and consistently came in top three)It's very sloppy. The combat is frequently silly, and doesn't require very much skill. The concept is amazing, but everything feels they tried to copy Halflife 2's crowbar-action and came up lacking. The games amusing, but I could have done with more Demon Souls/Dark Souls action where I felt like I was in control. Plus from the two hours I played (and consistently came in top three) there seems to be a lot of faux pas where the goal isn't to win, it's to have knife fights/fist fights. To me that's a sign that players are trying to get more then what's offered in this game. Expand
  39. Oct 31, 2012
    10
    Medieval Battlefield 3. Nuff said...
  40. Nov 27, 2012
    10
    Great game, never expected it to be so good. It is a bit frustrating to get the hang of at first, but then you get used to it and the game is really fun. I bought black ops too but haven't even touched it since I got this game, this is obviously the winner in my book.
  41. Nov 24, 2012
    10
    This game is epic incarnated, its a must to play with your friends, you will have the time of your life. The only issue i had was when doing the tutorial, there was a part that was not working, but its not that important.
  42. Feb 23, 2013
    7
    Simply put this is a Call of Duty Medieval Warfare, containing total 4 different character classes and lots of brutal deathblows. Many of the weapons in the game are either axes or swords and you unlock more as you play the game. Probably the main problem in this game is the new players difficulty, its really hard to go up against players who have experienced more than you (Especially inSimply put this is a Call of Duty Medieval Warfare, containing total 4 different character classes and lots of brutal deathblows. Many of the weapons in the game are either axes or swords and you unlock more as you play the game. Probably the main problem in this game is the new players difficulty, its really hard to go up against players who have experienced more than you (Especially in Free-for-All and Duel). At some times you find yourself thinking that some of the game weapons are overpowered and unbalanced but that is not true at all. Every weapon has it own weaknesses and pro's. Too many people spend time spamming chat with useless complaints and insults towards other players.

    If you are not ready to spend quite some time training how this game works you might reconsider spending your money into this game.
    Expand
  43. Nov 22, 2012
    7
    A fun "simulation" of medieval combat, with a deep sense of grounding and attempted realism. The games only downside being its "price". At around 20 euro or 25 dollars the game is priced at a primium rate when considering the amount of content which is up on offer. There's no single player campaign and the multiplayer content is also slightly lacking.

    For starters the weapon unlock
    A fun "simulation" of medieval combat, with a deep sense of grounding and attempted realism. The games only downside being its "price". At around 20 euro or 25 dollars the game is priced at a primium rate when considering the amount of content which is up on offer. There's no single player campaign and the multiplayer content is also slightly lacking.

    For starters the weapon unlock content is basic and each class can fully unlock their primary weapon with in a few hours. There's no character customization, such as helmets or armour pieces. There's really very lettle going on in this game besides the actual gameplay..

    The gameplay, is definitely fun and challenging. Challenging because the combat is very clunky, the game does not really "play well" in terms of fighting game mechanics. There's no in depth fighting game system here and most of the challenge comes from just trying to land blow. The game is fun though because it is challenging and also very gory. When a blow does land the player is treated tia sensational spectacle of blood and gore which few games can mimic (especially in this day and age of games being targetted at mass markets). Heads explode, arms are removed and the death scenes are treated by sensationally funny sound effects.

    All in all I have to give it to this game, it's fun. I enjoy shooting an arrow into the face of an opponent and hearing a "thud" and then witnessing the poor fellow slump to the ground. It's just very unfortunate that the game lacks polish and content, almost to the point where it feels very much so like a "mod" instead of a stand alone product.
    Expand
  44. Nov 23, 2012
    9
    You will be amazed! A friend gifted it to me on steam, and said play this. He enjoyed it that much now that says something about the quality of this game.
  45. Jan 26, 2013
    4
    Personally I was caught up in the "This game is great" nonsense. Luckily I didn't spend much on it because it was on sale but really. It's not that great, with a bunch of friends it can be fun, but it's buggy as hell. The health system doesn't make sense, sure the head does more damage, legs less. Makes sense. But it's half realistic combat half not. The game just doesn't know what itPersonally I was caught up in the "This game is great" nonsense. Luckily I didn't spend much on it because it was on sale but really. It's not that great, with a bunch of friends it can be fun, but it's buggy as hell. The health system doesn't make sense, sure the head does more damage, legs less. Makes sense. But it's half realistic combat half not. The game just doesn't know what it wants to be. Game needs a lot of polish to be good. If you want some good combat try out "War of The Roses" It has very fluid combat. Expand
  46. Dec 25, 2012
    4
    This is not a game. This is some kind of mod or something. All you do is to enter many servers online, start choping heads and limbs, and also get chopped many times. What is the idea behind this? I play 1 hour and next day? Why would I play again? There is no progression, you dont develop a character, you unlock nothing, and play for nothing. I m sorry guys, I go spend my time at least inThis is not a game. This is some kind of mod or something. All you do is to enter many servers online, start choping heads and limbs, and also get chopped many times. What is the idea behind this? I play 1 hour and next day? Why would I play again? There is no progression, you dont develop a character, you unlock nothing, and play for nothing. I m sorry guys, I go spend my time at least in Warband, enjoy single and if I want multi, I play multi.

    For me this game is awfull and I regret buying this game. I do not understand youngsters writing so many positive reviews about this game. Graphics are okay, sound are good but gameplay is bad, this is not a Gladiator, this not William Wallace, this is many mad man with swords and shields running around like mad chickens.
    Expand
  47. Dec 25, 2012
    7
    I haven't played WoR or Mount & Blade so I have no prior experience with medieval melee combat games. I bought this game because it looked hilarious and it was on sale for 13 bucks. Even at 13 bucks its not really worth it but I still enjoy the game for what it is. It's just a casual game where you can split skulls for 30 minutes. If I were reviewing this game at the $30 dollar retailI haven't played WoR or Mount & Blade so I have no prior experience with medieval melee combat games. I bought this game because it looked hilarious and it was on sale for 13 bucks. Even at 13 bucks its not really worth it but I still enjoy the game for what it is. It's just a casual game where you can split skulls for 30 minutes. If I were reviewing this game at the $30 dollar retail price I would say its not worth it. The graphics are dated, the performance optimization is questionable and I couldn't see myself playing this for more than an hour every couple of days because the game lacks depth. Also, the music is disgusting.

    Even with all its problems Chivalry is still fun and worth trying out if you can get it at a discount. The game modes are fun and sometimes if you get on a roll you can take out a large portion of the enemy team without dying. It's a decent game but I feel there is still a lot more work to be done. I hope this game sells well because it might mean more developers attempt to improve this style of multiplayer combat.
    Expand
  48. Jan 2, 2013
    5
    It has some good gamemodes, like objective, however the game is just a low skilled noob version of mount and blade, no manual blocking etc. I just spam lmb and come top of the scoreboards nigh on every game. In mount and blade you require teamwork, tactics, practise, skill, reflexes, in chivalry you only need a working index finger and a left mouse button.
  49. Dec 19, 2012
    8
    Good fun compared to the bland War of the Roses game, sadly lacking a solo player campaign that would have pushed the score up, slightly behind warband due to that, but great fun in the short term. Needs more maps and options but I only paid £5 in sales, so no regrets
  50. Mar 24, 2013
    8
    This game shows so much promise. Valve should really pick this game up and refine the hell out of whats already there and add the essential componants to make it an industry standard gem. Its kind of like a lesser version of L4D... This could be a Tee-up for a great second release that could (and probably already does) have a strong dedicated community that maxes out its potential in theThis game shows so much promise. Valve should really pick this game up and refine the hell out of whats already there and add the essential componants to make it an industry standard gem. Its kind of like a lesser version of L4D... This could be a Tee-up for a great second release that could (and probably already does) have a strong dedicated community that maxes out its potential in the gaming world. Expand
  51. Dec 2, 2013
    7
    While it has the potential to be a great game it's plagued (for the better part of a year) by poor frame rate and lag, even on high end machines and the developer's apparent disinterest to remedy the situation is all the more reason to buy this game only when its on sale.
  52. Dec 25, 2012
    8
    Solid game. Has many choices and you almost never feel underpowered as any one class. Larger servers really do feel like giant medieval battles and it really accomplishes its goal. If it can fix the small issues (hit detection, block and collision detection problems) it could really improve. Is definitely a game to get.
  53. Mar 25, 2014
    8
    Chivalry medieval warfare is a very nice and polished game, if you ever wanted what it feel like to be in the shoes of a medieval warrior wearing 30 kg of steel, this is the game for you, right now it is still in beta but the developers seem to update the game with new content and patches on a regular basis.
  54. Mar 28, 2013
    8
    Chivalry: Medieval warfare is a first-person (Third-person is also available) multiplayer ‘Slasher’, it uses real-time swinging system that can accurately cut off limbs; depending on how accurate YOU are. This multiplayer-only game features no single player story mode, although you will be given the option to play offline with BOTS. Chivalry is set in the fictional medieval world, whereChivalry: Medieval warfare is a first-person (Third-person is also available) multiplayer ‘Slasher’, it uses real-time swinging system that can accurately cut off limbs; depending on how accurate YOU are. This multiplayer-only game features no single player story mode, although you will be given the option to play offline with BOTS. Chivalry is set in the fictional medieval world, where two armies; the Agatha Knights and the Mason Order are battling each other for control. The Mason Order was once a part of Agatha, however they has split into a newly formed order who wish to take Agathian’s lands. The player will be given the choice to side with the Order or the Knights. The story is told through its multiplayer objective games, where either side is given the chance to attack and defend.
    As I have found, this game is highly addictive. My playtime can be set out in a ‘highly detailed’ chart.
    1 hour Wtf? How did he? Why am I dead?
    2 hours *Escape* *Quit*
    3+ hours Wtf? How did I? Why am I alive?
    The game’s gruesome melee system is a graphic delight; nothing is more satisfying then killing someone and then attempting to slice off the ragdoll’s head to see it rolling down a hill. The game is running on the Unreal 3 engine and looks very pretty, although some of the scripted sequences need some more work. For example when a wall has been torn down with a Ballista (or any other more appropriate medieval tools( I don’t do too well with the thinking)) you can see the wall slide down into the ground with rubble sliding up as well as the many particle effects used to hide this, clearly not well.
    Now finally the combat, this is the biggest review scoring factor. The game uses a real-time swing system; the player will get the choice to choose 3 types of attacks; the swing, the overhead and the stab. Each attack available will be given the ability to modify it location mid swing, enabling the player to cut behind a shield or through it when the game doesn’t like me, did I mention the game dislikes me? Four classes will be available to the player with different traits and abilities, each balancing speed, weapons and health; one of these classes is an Archer, is very out of place in this game. The whole game uses a melee system; the addition of archers just seems to be used to appeal to medieval enthusiasts. For a group of players looking to ‘clan-it-up’, all they need to do is move around their enemy to poke at this back until someone wishes to steal a kill.
    Chivalry is an extremely addictive game, it uses an unlock system to drag the player through the archer’s crossbow for the sweet, sweet ‘clean’ weapon selection menu. The game is currently filling an empty market of multiplayer sword fighting, which means this is the best you’ll get; although that’s not a bad thing.
    Expand
  55. Feb 19, 2013
    9
    Lets see. Title is Chivalry: Medieval Warfare. I think thats a good point. It gives you what it sells. Warfare. Don't ask for more. The combat system is well made, being simple enough to let you learn it without a headache. Graphics are OK, but visual style and dismembering are very good. Its weak point is the lack of group tactic, but every battle is epic. Furthermore, it has a bigLets see. Title is Chivalry: Medieval Warfare. I think thats a good point. It gives you what it sells. Warfare. Don't ask for more. The combat system is well made, being simple enough to let you learn it without a headache. Graphics are OK, but visual style and dismembering are very good. Its weak point is the lack of group tactic, but every battle is epic. Furthermore, it has a big community playing right now. Expand
  56. Oct 6, 2015
    8
    If you aren't willing to put at least 300 hours into this game, you will not be good at it. The game has a huge learning curve and you will regularly get **** on by high ranking players (unless you stick to low-rank servers) unless you put in the time and practice to hone your timing, accuracy and footwork. The only way to get good at this game is to play it A LOT.

    That being said, you
    If you aren't willing to put at least 300 hours into this game, you will not be good at it. The game has a huge learning curve and you will regularly get **** on by high ranking players (unless you stick to low-rank servers) unless you put in the time and practice to hone your timing, accuracy and footwork. The only way to get good at this game is to play it A LOT.

    That being said, you don't need to be really good at this game to enjoy it. There are a lot of low-rank servers that are well populated at the moment and they consist of most people just swinging blindly into each other having fun (with the exception of a handful of tryhards who make new accounts just so they cn get a fresh rank and kill noobs in low-rank servers).

    What I described above is very important, because some people will want to be good at this game but won't be willing to put in the time which will result in them being frustrated and not playing again, wasting their money. Now you know.

    Gameplay is Chivalry's greatest strength. You may see others comparing the gameplay/controls to games like war of the roses or mount & blade, but truth is there really is nothing to compare. They are all different games, but in terms of melee combat Chivalry's system is much more intuitive, realistic, smooth and in-depth (there is actually nothing else quite like it). I won't get into the details, but I'll just say that once you decide to graduate from swinging blindly, there are always ways to improve how you fight and there will always be new tactics you can encounter. The combat system is done so well, that people can even create their own attacks (using the drag mechanic), and people have created some very cool ones that are quite difficult to block, making the game fresh for everyone.

    Graphically, Chivalry looks pretty good. However, it runs quite terribly. It isn't too hard to get the game running at 60fps though, which is what matters for me. I simply turn down all my settings and play it as smoothly as possible. If you have a rig powerful enough to run at 60fps with maxed settings, the experience will definitely even be more enjoyable for you, because the game does look really good (watch a video for yourself).

    Chivalry is quite buggy. But despite what all the try-hards say, there aren't really any game breaking bugs. The only crash I've experienced in the past couple years is when I minimize the game as its loading a map. Crashing mid-game is something that, for most people, never happens. Most "bugs" consist of the rare occurrence of a swing ghosting through a player, or hearing the sound of a parry but still failing to parry the attack. 99% of the time, when your swing ghosts through a player it is because you or your enemy has a high ping, or server lag. There aren't any game breaking bugs. The worst thing to deal with in chivalry is the server lag, for more reasons than one. It happens frequently (at least once or twice every few hours) but not enough to be frustrating for me. Besides, the lag always comes and goes, it's never there for an entire game. The really annoying thing is that players will claim that you are lagging when you beat them, even though they have no way of differentiating from server lag and you possibly lagging.

    Which brings me to the community. I'm not going to be that guy who says Chivalry has the best or worst community. Those people are idiots. However, I will say that most people in the game have one of two attitudes:

    #1. If they lose to you, they will compliment you on your victory, attempt to find out what they did wrong and rematch you again to try and improve themselves.

    #2. If they lose to you, they will call you a lagger, hacker, exploiter or no-life etc. These people rematch you because they are upset that they lost and they want to make themselves feel better. They don't improve quickly at the game compared to people who have attitude #1.

    There are plenty of players with attitude #2, so just be weary of that. The game has a huge skill gap which is rarely found in other games these days that often hold the player's hand. Many new players find this skill gap hard to accept and will immediately resort to calling others cheaters instead of being interested in what makes them so good at the game (which is how you should think). In fact the skill gap is so wide that, without server lag and bug encounters, it can literally be impossible for a "newish" player to kill some of the oldest ones.

    Overall, the game is one of the best I've played. I've put in almost 1000 hours now. There's hardly ever new content or patches in the game, but I'm always learning how to improve swordplay, which is enough to keep it interesting. Also, the game, at its heart, is hilarious. I can't finish one game without giggling or laughing. I almost always feel good when I play it. That always makes me come back. The exaggerated voice acting honestly doesn't get old.
    Expand
  57. Dec 20, 2012
    7
    At first I thought this game was not that great, I wasn't a fan of the strange pov and it seemed like combat was random, but after playing it a bit I have come to appreciate it and it is actually a lot of fun.
  58. Dec 15, 2012
    7
    I started off with this game only knowing what I had seen in videos, and in those said videos this game looked like a blast. The back-swing mechanic, the way your weapons actually have an arc to them, hit-boxes, etc. were all some of the major things I really looked forward to with this game.
    Within a week I purchased it, and within a week I could already tell that this was just going to
    I started off with this game only knowing what I had seen in videos, and in those said videos this game looked like a blast. The back-swing mechanic, the way your weapons actually have an arc to them, hit-boxes, etc. were all some of the major things I really looked forward to with this game.
    Within a week I purchased it, and within a week I could already tell that this was just going to be another easily-exploited PvP game. You will find yourself annoyed or even infuriated by this games distinct lack of balance. I understand where the developers were coming from, trying to make a realistic PvP medieval game, and I can respect that. But the lack of balance in this game makes a good portion of your games boring as your constantly slaughtered by Vanguards and Archers. So unless you plan to play as the aforementioned classes, prepare to be murdered over and over again by the same dude with a pole-axe.
    All in all this game is a blast when your allowed to have fun, the design, game-play, and even humor in this game makes it amazing, and when your alive, you will probably be laughing the entire time. But that is only a fraction of the time due to its lack of balance and easy exploits.
    Expand
  59. Jan 2, 2014
    9
    Really solid game for a first release of a company.What i like most is even when i started whit basic weapons as a newb, i was already finishing in the top 1/4.Why? Because for once, SKILLS are the most important to play this game, no mather what weapon you have, it does not mean you any stronger than any newb.Personaly, i dont agree that the learning curve is ''long'', after my 1st hourReally solid game for a first release of a company.What i like most is even when i started whit basic weapons as a newb, i was already finishing in the top 1/4.Why? Because for once, SKILLS are the most important to play this game, no mather what weapon you have, it does not mean you any stronger than any newb.Personaly, i dont agree that the learning curve is ''long'', after my 1st hour of gameplay i was already knowing everything someone need to know.Game is fantastic specially if you don't have hours to invest in gaming, you can log in & stop 15 min after, you gonna get your fun anyway since it's only focused on the action.The only reason why I didnt gave it a 10 it's because i would like to see a lot more customization -unlockable by experience would be perfect, like the weapon system- Other than that, i can say that it's the best indie game i've ever play in years, and really hope it's the beginning of a long serie Expand
  60. Mar 8, 2018
    10
    Гениальная игра! Берите пацаны не пожалеете!
  61. Sep 23, 2013
    7
    This game is fun, really fun. If you're good at it... New players will litterally be crushed in multiplayer, and the combat can feel very unfair in many places. Blocked? NOPE! Dodged? NOPE! Sometimes, when you are sure that you get hit, you don't! And those times where you think you dodged, YOU DON'T! And archers... god those archers, they are seriously annoying. WHO LET AN ARCHER IN THEThis game is fun, really fun. If you're good at it... New players will litterally be crushed in multiplayer, and the combat can feel very unfair in many places. Blocked? NOPE! Dodged? NOPE! Sometimes, when you are sure that you get hit, you don't! And those times where you think you dodged, YOU DON'T! And archers... god those archers, they are seriously annoying. WHO LET AN ARCHER IN THE ARENA?! IT MAKES NO SENSE! My advice, get really good at the game, and it will definetly be a blast. When you get the hang of it, the combat is very challenging, but incredibly satisfying. If you're bad at it, well you better bring some tissues then Expand
  62. Dec 8, 2015
    9
    Most games that attempt to simulate melee combat fail, but Chivalry is not only incredibly fun and in many ways realistic, but also very complex. Graphics are solid, weapon variety is good, and weapons are actually very different from each other and present totally different playstyles. The game's 4 classes are all distinct and have their unique strengths/weaknesses.

    The gameplay is
    Most games that attempt to simulate melee combat fail, but Chivalry is not only incredibly fun and in many ways realistic, but also very complex. Graphics are solid, weapon variety is good, and weapons are actually very different from each other and present totally different playstyles. The game's 4 classes are all distinct and have their unique strengths/weaknesses.

    The gameplay is very fun - who wouldn't want to experience warfare in the middle ages?

    There are so many strategies and skills to learn that it takes a long time to actually get good at Chivalry - just like with an FPS like Counter-Strike. I think this is one of the hallmarks of a well-designed game - that it is hard in a way that isn't cheap, but takes time to master.

    My only criticism is the lack of maps and gameplay modes.
    Expand
  63. Mar 5, 2013
    8
    It's definitely worth a look. The gameplay is satisfying and (I think) pretty realistic. I haven't been in that many sword fights, but when an enemy knight swings his great sword at me ingame, I am aware of its edge. The controls are fairly intuitive and fun to use. The ranged classes could use a bit of retooling. Archers pretty much just run into combat and take pot-shots instead ofIt's definitely worth a look. The gameplay is satisfying and (I think) pretty realistic. I haven't been in that many sword fights, but when an enemy knight swings his great sword at me ingame, I am aware of its edge. The controls are fairly intuitive and fun to use. The ranged classes could use a bit of retooling. Archers pretty much just run into combat and take pot-shots instead of hanging back. I really wish the servers were a little more full. I think this is a game that was really designed for 32 person teams and up, but is hampered by technological limitations and a lack of a player base. Expand
  64. Apr 21, 2013
    7
    At various points the game is epic and immersive displays with war cries, taunts and the presence of mutilations and beheadings, which makes the game even more exciting. However, the combat system is difficult and often confusing, it takes a lot of determination to get to grips with the attacks and defenses of each character class by the beginner player who starts the game at an extremeAt various points the game is epic and immersive displays with war cries, taunts and the presence of mutilations and beheadings, which makes the game even more exciting. However, the combat system is difficult and often confusing, it takes a lot of determination to get to grips with the attacks and defenses of each character class by the beginner player who starts the game at an extreme disadvantage compared to veterans. Expand
  65. May 21, 2013
    8
    excellent jeux de combat medieval beau graphisme gameplay sympat un tres beau jeux .
    je le recommande a ceux qui en ont mare de battlefield ou autre call of duty .
    par contre ce jeux n ai pas fait pour les enfants de moins de 15 ans
  66. Jun 18, 2013
    8
    Graphics 8/10
    Game Play 9/10
    Originality 10/10 Sounds 10/10 Interface 4/10 Controlability 10/10 Learning Curve 9/10 Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is one of the easiest games to jump in and have a blast, but the learning curve for new players is very hard. Most new players swing left click over and over again without thought or strategies; this is a mistake. Hell most of the
    Graphics 8/10
    Game Play 9/10
    Originality 10/10
    Sounds 10/10
    Interface 4/10
    Controlability 10/10
    Learning Curve 9/10

    Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is one of the easiest games to jump in and have a blast, but the learning curve for new players is very hard. Most new players swing left click over and over again without thought or strategies; this is a mistake. Hell most of the reviews that were low score were made my "gamers" that never understood the true versatility of the game.

    Most of these reviews were written before the major updates to the game. The devs have added to the 3 main attacks(right shoulder overhand, horizontal swing right to left, and a stab), now you can swing horizontally left to right and swing an overhand from the opposite shoulder. This adds depth to the game and makes defending and attacking more versatile. The beta was full of glitches and problems affecting game play, 90% of them have been fixed.

    I'm level 35 with 450 hours in the game, i know this game forwards and backwards and the ability to adjust you swings by slowing them down and speeding them up with a movement of your mouse is one of the greatest innovations in a game in many years. Hell you can lean forward and backwards at the waist to do a matrix lean back dodge or duck under an enemies swing. This adds so much to the game in the way of learning curve. Not only do you have to hit someone that is dodging under and around your strikes but you have to dodge around there swings as you miss over there head and they come in at close range to hit you while your still swinging your whiffed strike.

    This is a real time strategy game with twitch based game play, but you wont see all this till at least 10-15 hours in the game. Normally around level 15 is when people start to "see" the animations of the characters as second nature and react instantly to the swings. I have never played a multi-player game that was harder to master and more rewarding to learn in. There's nothing quite like pulling off a new move in combat and getting it to work at the dismay and of the enemies in the game.

    There's a lot more to the game then people think. For example, when preforming an overhead attack(alt overhead is best) the swing starts behind you. If you jump at your opponent and turn 180 degrees around(back to them) and swing a overhead in the air while leaning backwards you can hit your opponent with your back turned to them. This sounds a bit ridiculous, and it is, but its not easy to do(100 hours of toying with it for it to work right and look smooth). I gave this example to show that the reviewers have NO CLUE how in-depth the melee combat is. Our group of player, |MonK|, has formed its own style in the game were we do 360's while jumping and swinging, mind you that it does not look glitched or break the game by exploit. It is very hard to do and takes way to much practice, but the rewards of being able to preform a perfect 360 to reverse 180 to 360 while swinging and hit them is all worth the time.

    THIS GAME IS HARD TO MASTER!!!! TRY TILL LEVEL 15 TO GET A FULL VIEW OF THE GAME.

    In closing i would say buy this game, its only 25 bucks and that is very cheap for the gameplay it offers. There are lots of games made by AAA developers that cant stand toe to toe with the epic gameplay and utter controlability of this game.

    Hope this helped,
    |MonK| Werwolf
    Expand
  67. Aug 17, 2013
    7
    The game is great! yes there are a few bugs and certain weapons seem to be overpowered but I feel that a few updates from now this game should be pitch perfect, what amazed me the most is how fluent and fast the combat is! One moment I'm on my feet the next moment I'm trying to find my head which is rolling on the floor due to the everyday man-at-arms halberd.
  68. Dec 28, 2013
    7
    It has very fun game-play, some people complain about that there is only four classes, but the way you can set them up makes them quite different for each player and the game-modes are all very different. However you need to spend a long, long time fixing all the major bugs that come with this near unfinished game that the lazy programmers never bothered to fix. The graphics andIt has very fun game-play, some people complain about that there is only four classes, but the way you can set them up makes them quite different for each player and the game-modes are all very different. However you need to spend a long, long time fixing all the major bugs that come with this near unfinished game that the lazy programmers never bothered to fix. The graphics and customization options are also very good.
    Enjoy!
    Expand
  69. Nov 12, 2013
    8
    Great multiplayer action! Decapitate foes, pierce enemies with amazing weapons, and play with friends to achieve many goals in the many objective games! A great buy!
  70. Jun 24, 2015
    8
    I love the Medieval style in Chivalry, from a mod Torn Banner Studios made a good game that travels you back to the historic times. And although I don't agree to DLC, Chivalry: Deadliest Warrior which is mostly based (as far as I know) on the TV series adds some new classes like Samurai, Knight, Pirates and more!

    Arrrrggghhh!
  71. Jul 9, 2014
    10
    Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is awesome if you like the genre, buy it! This game make me laugh to death every times I play it! In my opinion, this game is a bomb of fun and laughing! I bought it one year ago and still play it, what to say more... FORR AGATHAAAA!!! (charge and chop a head off with your sword) LOL :)
  72. Nov 9, 2014
    9
    While this game does have its bugs and problems, it is a unique, rewarding experience that never seems to get old. The price of the game well fits what you get. In my opinion, this game is the best medieval warfare game on available, with hours upon hours of exciting game play. This game's graphics are awesome; not outstanding, but they are what they need to be and they are very appealingWhile this game does have its bugs and problems, it is a unique, rewarding experience that never seems to get old. The price of the game well fits what you get. In my opinion, this game is the best medieval warfare game on available, with hours upon hours of exciting game play. This game's graphics are awesome; not outstanding, but they are what they need to be and they are very appealing and nice-looking.

    Pros:
    -Very fun gameplay
    -Great graphics
    -Great, balanced combat system
    -Good weapon balancing
    -Kills/wins very rewarding
    -Entertaining comical aspects for
    those with a sense of humor
    -Only $25

    Cons:
    -May be difficult for new players
    -A few glitchy aspects to combat
    Expand
  73. Jun 16, 2015
    9
    This is a beautiful game with amazing gameplay. After playing Skyrim and other medieval combat games, the system of being able to finely tune your attack to suit the circumstances is a breath of fresh air. An attack doesn't always mean a slash with a sword or axe. The player can choose to stab, slice left to right, etc. Combining this with entertaining objective and deathmatch gamemodes,This is a beautiful game with amazing gameplay. After playing Skyrim and other medieval combat games, the system of being able to finely tune your attack to suit the circumstances is a breath of fresh air. An attack doesn't always mean a slash with a sword or axe. The player can choose to stab, slice left to right, etc. Combining this with entertaining objective and deathmatch gamemodes, (as well as others) and you have a solid game the likes of which have never been seen. Expand
  74. Feb 13, 2016
    10
    This game is all I ever wanted in a sword fighting game. It keeps getting better and better as they add more content too. Very addicting, and fun to play with friends!
  75. Dec 16, 2016
    9
    Great game, I played 380 hours and I still have to mastered every moves and weapons. The game is cheap (I bought it 3€) so I would recomend all to give it a try. The only con is that it is getting old, and there are not a lot of new players.

    Next game will be Mirage: arcane warfare, I tried it and it's going to be an epic game as well
  76. Dec 31, 2016
    10
    This game is a masterpiece. The combat is incredibly challenging but also very fun to use and learn. You can use the movement of your mouse to dodge swings from a greatsword and kill a heavily armoured knight with a dagger if you're skilled enough, and boy is it a good feeling. People moan about the mechanics being broken... They're not broken, you're just bad at realistic melee combat. :^)
  77. Feb 14, 2017
    8
    It's a fun game, worh the price, but at the end you may become frustrated by the animation and not momentum based combat the game has.

    The combat system basically boils down to the following: your opponent starts spinning essentially making a sword field around him and by the Schrödinger paradox the weapon is always there or not and you cannot find out until it has gone past you or hit
    It's a fun game, worh the price, but at the end you may become frustrated by the animation and not momentum based combat the game has.

    The combat system basically boils down to the following: your opponent starts spinning essentially making a sword field around him and by the Schrödinger paradox the weapon is always there or not and you cannot find out until it has gone past you or hit you. Basically the high level gameplay is literal nausea inducing ballet but the rest of the game is pretty enjoyable and actually skill based.
    Expand
  78. Jan 2, 2019
    10
    Chivalry: Medieval Warfare: A pesar de que este tenga algún par de bugs, lo encuentro muy entretenido y con unos gráficos bastante decentes, hay variedad de servidores y aun hay gente que lo sigue jugando, en cuanto a la jugabilidad y el sistema de combate esta muy bien logrado (eso si hay que practicar un poco antes porque puede que se te haga difícil al principio) Juego que recomiendo yChivalry: Medieval Warfare: A pesar de que este tenga algún par de bugs, lo encuentro muy entretenido y con unos gráficos bastante decentes, hay variedad de servidores y aun hay gente que lo sigue jugando, en cuanto a la jugabilidad y el sistema de combate esta muy bien logrado (eso si hay que practicar un poco antes porque puede que se te haga difícil al principio) Juego que recomiendo y vale la pena! Expand
  79. Aug 3, 2013
    6
    Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is a multiplayer first person shooter where you join one of two factions: the Knights of Agatha, or the Masons. Matches include last man standing, team deathmatch, or team objective. The graphics are decent, with plenty of options for users to adjust their detail settings for their individual systems. The biggest problem I have with this game is that certainChivalry: Medieval Warfare is a multiplayer first person shooter where you join one of two factions: the Knights of Agatha, or the Masons. Matches include last man standing, team deathmatch, or team objective. The graphics are decent, with plenty of options for users to adjust their detail settings for their individual systems. The biggest problem I have with this game is that certain levels are actually unplayable if you try to play them without any human players. That's really stupid, considering that the game has been out for over a year. To make matters worse, the combat mechanics are kind of crappy. On many occasions I found myself getting hit when I know damn well that I was blocking, even with shields. Basically there's a block, then you have three strike types: overhead, a swing, and a stab. I snatched this game up on Steam during one of the sales. It's fun if you are playing a match with a ton of people, but don't get your hopes up too high. Expand
  80. Jun 6, 2013
    7
    Great game with best medieval combat mechanics made so far. You can block, feint, combo, stab, slash, kick, throw things, this is absolutely great. Sounds are heavy, realistic and help the immersion a lot. The combat is also quite bloody, you can chop off someone's limbs or head, so not for everyone's taste (I think you can disable the brutal combat visuals though). There is a vast amountGreat game with best medieval combat mechanics made so far. You can block, feint, combo, stab, slash, kick, throw things, this is absolutely great. Sounds are heavy, realistic and help the immersion a lot. The combat is also quite bloody, you can chop off someone's limbs or head, so not for everyone's taste (I think you can disable the brutal combat visuals though). There is a vast amount of weapons to choose from, 4 distinctive classes and many diffrent game modes ranging from simple deatmatches to sieges with catapults and ballistas Maps are interesting and there are a lot of them (for example an arena pit great for deatmatches). The graphics are not really that good, especially the maps look, well, quite ugly to be honest. Also I hate the game's music but hey you can turn it off (it's not Modern Warfare 3 where you couldn't Lol).
    Game has some problems with hit detections and lags, but it's not so drastic like some people claim.
    Solid game gets a solid 7/10 score.
    Expand
  81. Jul 1, 2013
    8
    At first you find yourself in hysterics over the sounds and atmosphere in this game that make it so fun. However, shortly you'll find yourself really getting in to the combat. For me this is a unique game that will hopefully lead to a whole new niche genre of medieval FPS games. Awesome fun!
  82. Jun 6, 2013
    7
    This game isn't perfect but gives a nice combat system that's unlike most and the game is a great way to kill time. I recommend giving it a try and for how cheap you can get the game it's worth the investment. Just prepare to die A LOT!
  83. Nov 3, 2013
    7
    Its more like this is a great idea, and could be a fantastic game, but the devs aren't making that happen, i.e. the current execution is not ideal. I'd rather some experienced dev team take this idea and make it into what it can be. If the game works performance wise (i.e. you probably have a decent, with a year or two of age, gaming computer), then you can have a lot of fun, assuming youIts more like this is a great idea, and could be a fantastic game, but the devs aren't making that happen, i.e. the current execution is not ideal. I'd rather some experienced dev team take this idea and make it into what it can be. If the game works performance wise (i.e. you probably have a decent, with a year or two of age, gaming computer), then you can have a lot of fun, assuming you can get past the bugs, mainly those of the server browser (i.e. difficultly joining servers), and those in combat. Really, this game is best when you don't take it too seriously (because of gameplay bugs and balance), which is a problem for those looking to be competitive. The skill ceiling, despite the few simplifications and such the devs have made (possibly not on purpose), is still pretty high and there's almost always some cool new trick or maneuver or whatever you can learn. The game has seen a lot of patches, yet there seems to be a pattern: Fixing one things breaks another, sometimes meaning that an old bug is brought back. The dev team really seems inexperienced. They have poor communication with the community and poor transparency. Its seems to be a common enough thing that major patches have gradually decreased the performance of the game (optimization of the game never seems to have been visibly (and non-trivially) addressed). For example, the game is neigh unplayable for be now, in that load times are extraordinary (~3 minute launch times). Expand
  84. Jul 17, 2013
    8
    This game is sort of stupid, but in the Garry's Mod way, as in it's a stupidly fun time! The game is absolutely hilarious, with the various knights shouting and flailing their swords everywhere! The only downside is that it's buggy, but that's not even close to a deal breaker. Recommended!
  85. Jul 19, 2013
    8
    The word "visceral" gets thrown around far too often when describing video games. However, in the case of chivalry, that's all that needs to be said. The combat is weighty and brutal. I wouldn't say it has the thumping precision of a game like Dark Souls, but for a first person hand to hand combat multiplayer game, (not that there are many options out there lol) this is about as good asThe word "visceral" gets thrown around far too often when describing video games. However, in the case of chivalry, that's all that needs to be said. The combat is weighty and brutal. I wouldn't say it has the thumping precision of a game like Dark Souls, but for a first person hand to hand combat multiplayer game, (not that there are many options out there lol) this is about as good as it gets. The visuals are also a very nice touch. Great art direction, textures, dynamic lighting and physics. This game is constantly on sale and you can pick it up on Steam for a very good price these days. BUY IT! Expand
  86. Jun 23, 2013
    8
    Fun and challenging. To play well in this game it requires teamwork, patience, and timing. If you don't want to learn how the weapons work, or don't want to have the patience it takes to win these fights as most one on one fights take a few minutes, you wont like this game. It takes a while to get used to but its worth putting in the time.
  87. Jul 13, 2013
    7
    Its a good game, not great still needs some work. Amazing visuals for an indie game, but game-play is not smooth. I would say try the half life 2 mod first before you buy this (the mod is better) but if not, this is a good replacement if you are tired of shooting bullets.
  88. Dec 24, 2015
    7
    A game in which you take the combat system of Elder Scrolls and beat up other people with it. A very fun game. Muliplayer exclusive. The player is also able to customize your play style with multiple weapons and appearances, many different game types too.
  89. Sep 18, 2013
    7
    Get it on sale and it's worth it. Combat is kind of clunky and the controls aren't great but it is fun and has a lot of moves you can try to pull off. I prefer the archery/crossbows myself. It's entirely possible to one-shot people with well placed attacks.
  90. Aug 23, 2013
    6
    Would be much higher if it wasn't for all the bugs, exploits, low quantity of maps, weapons. Still no mod tools. It is very fun and addicting for what it is but has too many bugs to get a higher score.
  91. Jul 17, 2013
    6
    a frustrating rageing hard game were classes and weapons are over powered but get a bit fun when you learn to play more however its pretty original considering all people play usual are fps theses days
  92. Jul 28, 2013
    8
    Walking on sunshine, blue sky, green grass, what a beautiful day. Except the body parts and blood all around. Man screams and howls all around you combined with iron clashes. Suddenly, you get beheaded.

    This game is extremely manly. It's multiplayer only, but that's the sole purpose of it. Gameplay is balanced, complicated and hard to master which makes you want to play and get better
    Walking on sunshine, blue sky, green grass, what a beautiful day. Except the body parts and blood all around. Man screams and howls all around you combined with iron clashes. Suddenly, you get beheaded.

    This game is extremely manly. It's multiplayer only, but that's the sole purpose of it. Gameplay is balanced, complicated and hard to master which makes you want to play and get better at it. You could compare it to counter strike except is mostly melee and not so popular.

    Go and get some, you won't regret. Are you scared, boy
    Expand
  93. Jul 28, 2013
    8
    I played this game quite a bit now, the graphics are pretty good with special attention to the effects. The gameplay is very unique and that is a huge plus. The game is wildly fun if you can get on a server with two equally skilled teams.

    That said there are definitely some technical bugs, the server list doesn't always work correctly, and it took a search on their forums on how to join
    I played this game quite a bit now, the graphics are pretty good with special attention to the effects. The gameplay is very unique and that is a huge plus. The game is wildly fun if you can get on a server with two equally skilled teams.

    That said there are definitely some technical bugs, the server list doesn't always work correctly, and it took a search on their forums on how to join with a friend. (Looking now it should have been obvious but it's really not.) There are a few freezes every now and then.

    Classes are more balanced now as I understand, I still get the itch that archers should just be removed from the game, or limited to how many can be on a team, I'm not saying that it's cheap, because using the bow is pretty hard, but it kind of takes away why I even wanted to play the game: first person melee, but you end up running for 45 seconds to get to someone and then you just get taken out by some a-hole sitting on a tower, that you can't even shoot back at or counter in any way. Then you find out that some people play in 3rd person, which I hear is much easier, well if I wanted to play a third person action game I'd go play something that does it much better than this game. But it does give you an advantage in being able to see where your strikes are actually going.

    Overall, it's a unique experience to say the least. Battles with 40+ people are chaotic and fun. They just need to flesh out some things and I'll play it more than I currently do.
    Expand
  94. Jul 27, 2013
    8
    Pros: Very accurate medieval warfare, hilarious screaming, something not to be taken seriously, variety in classes, requires a lot of skill to play right but can be enjoyed regardless

    Cons: Without patience it can be frustrating, have to be within biting distance to hit, requires a lot of skill to play well. OK so this game might not be every ones cuppa' tea. I'll try my best to
    Pros: Very accurate medieval warfare, hilarious screaming, something not to be taken seriously, variety in classes, requires a lot of skill to play right but can be enjoyed regardless

    Cons: Without patience it can be frustrating, have to be within biting distance to hit, requires a lot of skill to play well.

    OK so this game might not be every ones cuppa' tea. I'll try my best to break it down in the simplest of terms.

    Chivalry is a game which requires a fair amount of practice and skill to play well. So MLG power weapon hoarders on Halo need not download. Strategic use of blocks, faint attacks and class play is required if the only way you can enjoy the game is to get a perfect K/D ratio. Though when you first play be warned, your ratio will be negative and that's ok.

    The fun of the game, for me, comes from the participating in giant skirmishes on open battleground. Charging headlong into a skirmish swinging your weapon in the hopes that your blade will be guided to victory and then discovering you've just decapitated your team mate. Yeah there's a fair few team kills so get used to saying sorry, a lot.

    Bloodshed in this game seems to think that Mortal Kombat just challenged it to a gore off, all sword attacks seem to chop off some part of your opponents body and leave them crying into the ground as the blood spurts from their arms. Just don't admire the effects too long or you'll find yourself joining them.

    Even fist attacks have the power of Thors Hammer in every swing as fist only matches tend to end with you knocking more heads off than Liu Kang at a bar fight (points to anyone who knows who Liu Kang is, which better be all of you.)

    Such a game of bloodshed and scream is accompanied by a variety of modes to back it up. Classic TDM and Free-for-alls are complimented by objective based team games such as Defend the King and others. This also comes with custom modes such as bar fights in which only fists are allowed and low gravity modes for those of you who are complete sadists.

    In summary Chivalry is a game you better get used to dying on. Cause you'll die lots before you get good.
    Expand
  95. Nov 8, 2019
    3
    As it is impossible to play, the game is just damp, do not recommend. Fun, only the first 15 minutes, and then because of the glitches no desire to play it
  96. Oct 13, 2014
    9
    Graphics/sound
    Wonderful, detailed graphics that also provide great FPS. I don't like the way metal looks but it's hard to complain when this is an indie game that looks as good as it does. The soundtrack is good, specifically the main menu theme, and the weapon sounds make the game really atmospheric.
    Gameplay Chivalry has a simple to learn, but hard to master way of controlling
    Graphics/sound
    Wonderful, detailed graphics that also provide great FPS. I don't like the way metal looks but it's hard to complain when this is an indie game that looks as good as it does. The soundtrack is good, specifically the main menu theme, and the weapon sounds make the game really atmospheric.

    Gameplay
    Chivalry has a simple to learn, but hard to master way of controlling sword strikes. It consists of clicking your mouse to swing (duh) which is made more complex by being able to use your mouse to speed up or slow down swings to fool or outpace the enemy. Stamina makes it so that it costs to miss an attack but makes it also cost to just keep blocking, as eventually you'll run out of stamina and die by doing this. HIGH LEARNING CURVE.

    Value
    Many different servers to play on and many different modes and maps, there is a lot to do here and the developers are committed to the game and releasing new content.

    I will note that this is a glitchy, crash-prone title and re-balances can drastically change the way to game works

    Conclusion
    Chivalry is an excellent online offering that is worth the 6.24 I paid for it
    9/10
    Expand
  97. May 20, 2014
    8
    The game itself is really fun, feels great and looks fine. Its a first/third person perspective hack and slash game, its not fast paced and you can't you can't just run and slash everything, theres more depth to the mechanics unlike many other games where you usually have just block and one or two attacks. Ranged weapons aren't easy to use either. I had lots of fun with this game, I lovedThe game itself is really fun, feels great and looks fine. Its a first/third person perspective hack and slash game, its not fast paced and you can't you can't just run and slash everything, theres more depth to the mechanics unlike many other games where you usually have just block and one or two attacks. Ranged weapons aren't easy to use either. I had lots of fun with this game, I loved the gore, killing felt satisfying, playing felt satisfying, waiting really long to connect unsuccessfully was not satisfying, no one being able to respawn in the middle of a match and wait until the last players alive will suicide or get kicked is not satisfying, I don't know if that was a temporary problem that got fixed but in the short time I played on the free weekend I had a lot of that, and thats the only thing that holds it back from being a 10 for me. Expand
  98. Jun 14, 2014
    6
    The game was really fun for me at first, however, all the issues with netcode and hit detection ruin it. I have 100mbps connection and always join low ping servers and every other person is glitching all over the place and hitting me through my shield/sword when I am clearly past his reach or blocking on my screen. When I die and people are hitting my body, my body is usually ~5 feet awayThe game was really fun for me at first, however, all the issues with netcode and hit detection ruin it. I have 100mbps connection and always join low ping servers and every other person is glitching all over the place and hitting me through my shield/sword when I am clearly past his reach or blocking on my screen. When I die and people are hitting my body, my body is usually ~5 feet away on his screen and blood is splattering from the empty floor/ground on my screen.The people who are "lagging" usually have low pings, so I know it's the engine at fault.

    Also, whenever you want to change your class... you have to do it every game and every time you switch classes in-game. It does not save your "loadout" selection.

    If it wasn't for the terrible hit detection and loadout not saving, this game would easily be a 8 out of 10. There are more issues with the game and Torn Banner apparently "breaks the game even further with every update".

    This game is not worth the $30 asking price. Wait for it to be $10 or less if you must buy it.
    Expand
  99. Jun 5, 2014
    7
    It's really fun, but very hard. It also doesn't seem like it, but it's very demanding, I had to turn all of my settings to low to play it, and even then it lagged or glitched pretty often, getting me killed. During a free weekend I recommend playing it as much as you can, because that's when all the newbies are playing, and it's not nearly as frustrating. This game isn't for everyone.
  100. Jul 1, 2014
    9
    The game is interesting and fun to play oochen company.
    Want pochuvstovat himself a knight? Then this game is for you!
    Awesome graphics, huge maps, and more! In Chivilari has plenty of variety than other games with a similar genre. Class 4, which each in its own unique. HUGE arsenal! From clubs, to the huge ax! From bow to a crossbow! Server for every taste! Realistic physics of
    The game is interesting and fun to play oochen company.
    Want pochuvstovat himself a knight? Then this game is for you!

    Awesome graphics, huge maps, and more!
    In Chivilari has plenty of variety than other games with a similar genre. Class 4, which each in its own unique.
    HUGE arsenal! From clubs, to the huge ax! From bow to a crossbow!
    Server for every taste!
    Realistic physics of damage!
    Virtually no cons, so take advise.
    Good luck!
    9/10
    Expand
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 24 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 24
  2. Negative: 0 out of 24
  1. Feb 26, 2013
    70
    A multiplayer experience that offers a realistic point of view of the Medieval melee battles. It's not fit for everyone, but if you get past the glitches and the high difficulty curve, you'll find an enjoyable and addictive game.
  2. PC Master (Greece)
    Feb 4, 2013
    80
    Chivalry is slightly… bipolar. The spectacle of a duel (especially if the two opponents are seasoned veterans) can be spectacularly breath-taking, a complex choreography that one can only marvel at. Blocks, feints, slashes, back-steps, side-hits: despite initial impressions, this can be a truly intellectual game of tactics, requiring high skills, observation and deviousness. On the other hand, the spectacle of a massive battle of fifty warriors can be ridiculously chaotic: especially if the players are inexperienced and go for blind “hack and slash” tactics, it’s more like a metal concert mosh pit than a battle for glory and honor. [February 2013]
  3. PC Gamer
    Feb 1, 2013
    81
    Chivalry is Quake to War of the Roses' Battlefield, and those seeking a faster-paced bloodier experience will undoubtedly prefer Chivalry's type of steel. [March 2013, p.65]