User Score
7.7

Generally favorable reviews- based on 972 Ratings

User score distribution:

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Nov 18, 2012
    5
    ah, chivalry. I used to play the mod: Age of chivalry with my mates back in the days when it came out, it rocked!. This game though, does not.

    First of all, the game looks great visualy and the gritty look is great! Sounds are on ''ok''-tier in my opinnion. Controls on the other hand arent that great. Moving and attacks feel laggy, janky and really unpredictable. Attacks dont connect
    ah, chivalry. I used to play the mod: Age of chivalry with my mates back in the days when it came out, it rocked!. This game though, does not.

    First of all, the game looks great visualy and the gritty look is great! Sounds are on ''ok''-tier in my opinnion. Controls on the other hand arent that great. Moving and attacks feel laggy, janky and really unpredictable. Attacks dont connect half the time, even when its a clear torso hit, blocks are so random, and the lack of directional blocking is a great miss, And its stupid when you block an greatsword attack (that has the weight of the sword + strenght of the attacked, plus the momentum behind it) with a small dagger. Your shield wont block attacks when its on your back, wait what. Yes you can have a humansized shield on your back and it wont protect you, yep.

    Game has a small unlock system, in which you kill players with a certain weapon to unlock a new weapon on the same tier. This has no place in the game on my opinion and the mod age of chivalry did this right, there was more classes in which the weapons were balanced out, here you only have 4 classes to choose from that have unlockable weapons.

    Game modes

    -FFA: total and utter **** imagine you are in a small 25meters x 25meters arena, with 31 other players, you spawn and you die 5 seconds later! Even if you manage to live the first 10 seconds and get into a duel, someone from behind will come and kill you with one swing to the head OR steal your kill.

    TDM: much more fun than FFA thats for sure. Still, its a mayhem if you wont be killed by enemies in 3v1 situacion youl get killed by that noob on your team that attacks with sweep attacks only.

    Objective: Its fun, on the defence, when you only have to walk 10 seconds into the objective when you respawn, attackers have to make a 1 minute run to the objective at the end of it. This mode could be fun if the attackers respawn would move as you go on, but no, it only moves when you complete the objective. This results in frustration, when you die, you respawn, then you run to your objective for 30-60 seconds only to find out that you are the only one there, aginst 3-6 defenders that murder you, rinse and repeat.

    Pros

    -Visualy nice looking game
    -Gritty and brutal

    Cons
    -23 euros for a dumbed down mod
    -Controls, attacks and blocking feels janky and laggy
    -unlock system does not benefit anyone in anyway
    -Respawns are really ****ty for the attackers side on the objective mode
    Expand
  2. Oct 22, 2012
    5
    As polished and appealing as this game is, it still fails to distinguish itself from the countless other free medieval warfare mods besides a small bump in graphics at the cost of 23 euro which will plague this game with a lack of players in the coming weeks.
  3. Feb 5, 2014
    5
    Seriously, if you're going to make a game this glitchy and buggy, maybe you shouldn't have ads you can't skip every time you boot the game after it crashes.

    Fun game, but poor coding kills it.
  4. Jan 2, 2015
    6
    The gameplay is an 8, the biggest downside it the "pro players" that do crazy drags and "rainbows". The game can be frustrating at times, but when you get the hang of it it is quite fun. However, the technical bugs lower this game's value; expect alt-tabbing to always crash the game or even your computer, also expect video/control setting to reset most time the game updates. Still though,The gameplay is an 8, the biggest downside it the "pro players" that do crazy drags and "rainbows". The game can be frustrating at times, but when you get the hang of it it is quite fun. However, the technical bugs lower this game's value; expect alt-tabbing to always crash the game or even your computer, also expect video/control setting to reset most time the game updates. Still though, this game is great fun, especially with friends. Expand
  5. Jul 22, 2018
    6
    The combat was super fun, but the mechanics are broken, you can do some really weird stuff if you pan your camera quickly etc.
  6. Jul 23, 2013
    7
    The game is good, but it has so many problems. Bugs everywhere, really there is invisible walls almost on every step. Bad optimization, my computer is able to have starcraft 2 and skyrim on ultra graphics, but this game finds way to lag even and medium resolution. But i could forgive al that, but there is one huge balance issue. Vanguards, the problem is that this class is: theThe game is good, but it has so many problems. Bugs everywhere, really there is invisible walls almost on every step. Bad optimization, my computer is able to have starcraft 2 and skyrim on ultra graphics, but this game finds way to lag even and medium resolution. But i could forgive al that, but there is one huge balance issue. Vanguards, the problem is that this class is: the fastest,highest damage, have biggest weapon range, stun, 2nd highest armor, and all what you need is to stab... When marines are dying from one hit, archers are able to survive only behind teammates or camping in spawn, and knights and the most balanced (strong, but slow).Winning vanguard is very hard, what makes an amaizing expierience, a worst nighmare. But the gore and "meat" gives this game a big But all those screams and heads flying cant keep you in that world for more than 3-14 days. With friends its amaizing game, i really hope, that maybe in 2nd chivalry we will have fix in balance lags, bugs, optimization and this will make the game being an awesome experience. Expand
  7. Jul 29, 2013
    7
    Initially i really wasn't that fond of this game however after playing it again recently i have come to the conclusion that i completely misjudged it. Once you get used to the combat system you can appreciate how well made this game is, for me it was the duel mode which changed my mind and team objective mode gives you a different experience than whats offered from similar games.Initially i really wasn't that fond of this game however after playing it again recently i have come to the conclusion that i completely misjudged it. Once you get used to the combat system you can appreciate how well made this game is, for me it was the duel mode which changed my mind and team objective mode gives you a different experience than whats offered from similar games.

    Unfortunately the achievements are completely bugged out and some just cant be unlocked even if you have done whats required to earn them. The only other drawback is the lack of maps which can make game play a little stale after going through the same map time after time. All of this could be fixed by a patch and a little DLC (hopefully free)

    The game gets a 7 but with some new maps and the achievements fixed its easily an 8.
    Expand
  8. Jun 19, 2016
    5
    The game is fun, but there are many reasons not to buy the game.

    Graphically the game doesn't change much from low detail settings to high ones (high detail is not really THAT detailed), most animations are clunky, there are serious graphical glitches, and finding 3 of them on 3h of casual gameplay is quite a lot if you ask me. Now, the players, if you get to play with all players with
    The game is fun, but there are many reasons not to buy the game.

    Graphically the game doesn't change much from low detail settings to high ones (high detail is not really THAT detailed), most animations are clunky, there are serious graphical glitches, and finding 3 of them on 3h of casual gameplay is quite a lot if you ask me.
    Now, the players, if you get to play with all players with low ping values (30~60) the game is mostly nice, otherwise people teleport... and if you try to hit an afterimage of a guy who's actually a few steps further, you leave yourself open for counterattacks and die. No fun about it.
    Finally, gamemodes, there are a lot (a lot with text glitches which render incomprehensible the actual objective too) and since the community is quite a bad one, the experience, especially in more complex game modes, is really poor/bad.

    Don't get me wrong, there are also reasons to like and play the game, like medieval warfare, pretty nice sword/axe/spear/bow/... fight, few interesting game modes, but for me they are still not enough to keep me playing this one.

    Don't get me wrong, this is one of the best casual games out there, but it's totally not worth its price (my reviews always account the price too).
    Expand
  9. Oct 24, 2018
    6
    This is a game I would have rated much higher, had I stopped playing after outranking the low rank (level 1-15) servers. As a kickstarter backer, I liked almost everything about it. The melee combat felt good, the sound design and graphics were great considering the game's age. It was my go-to game for stress relief and most people would agree that there is something relaxing aboutThis is a game I would have rated much higher, had I stopped playing after outranking the low rank (level 1-15) servers. As a kickstarter backer, I liked almost everything about it. The melee combat felt good, the sound design and graphics were great considering the game's age. It was my go-to game for stress relief and most people would agree that there is something relaxing about chopping some heads or limbs off from time to time. The only thing that I disliked was its toxic community, yes Chivalry: Medieval Warfare has one of the worst communities you can find in a video game.

    I've had read some reviews in the past about people abandoning the game after level 15 and my assumption was that skilled players overwhelm the high rank servers. My assumptions proved to be correct, but the thing is I do enjoy games where more skilled players have a clear advantage over the so called "noobs" and if the game is enjoyable enough, it only motivates me to get better. The main problem with Chivalry is not the fact that low rank players are "owned" by players with hundreds of hours of gameplay time. The problem is what you need to learn in order to play better....

    As soon as I landed on the high rank servers (the game doesn't let you join low rank ones when you reach level 16), I started seeing other players doing moves that I had never seen before, basically butchering some other players. My initial thought was to learn how to do those same combat moves. I checked some youtube videos and that's when the game was instantly killed for me. Over the time, players found hit box and movement glitches which -if you use them well- either cannot be blocked or give you a clear advantage. It still does require skill to exploit those glitches, but unfortunately the very existence thereof killed all the immersion and enjoyment I get from Chivalry. If you want to know what I'm talking about, just search keywords such as "reverse overhead", "rainbow", "dragging". It is a shame really, designing a game with obvious glitches and not fixing them, because there is a player base enjoying their time from the exploitation of such glitches. It is a shame, because Chivalry would otherwise be a great game, for what it is.
    Expand
  10. Feb 26, 2018
    7
    The game is pleasing, but it gets tired quickly. There are also ping problems.
  11. Apr 29, 2018
    7
    Some servers are very unfriendly after leaving the low level servers. You can be bullied out of servers which could completely ruin your experience. Fun game, but play at your own risk.
  12. Dec 21, 2012
    5
    As much as I want to like this game I can't bring myself to give it a high score. I was really excited to play this and I thought it was actually going to be like a tactical melee medieval game. IN NO WAY IS IT TACTICAL. People are fighting in the masses which isn't a bad thing if there was any tactic to this. There is no strategy or skill involved in this game. Just charge in andAs much as I want to like this game I can't bring myself to give it a high score. I was really excited to play this and I thought it was actually going to be like a tactical melee medieval game. IN NO WAY IS IT TACTICAL. People are fighting in the masses which isn't a bad thing if there was any tactic to this. There is no strategy or skill involved in this game. Just charge in and hack and slash everything you see is what this game is composed of. This isn't even the worst part. The hit detection is terrible; most of the hits you get in and attacks you block make no sense whatsoever. When it seems like you should've hit the other player or blocked an attack it doesn't happen! Incredibly broken. It gets really annoying when you switch classes as well; everytime you choose a class you have to set up your weaponry all over again. It'd be nice to see some sort of loadout instead of having to choose everything individually. The graphics are fine. I don't care for graphics as long as it's enjoyable but the gritty style put on by this game looks great. Sounds are mediocre at best but decent enough. Plenty of variation in game types. Classes are rather unbalanced though considering some classes run much too quickly or other classes run much to slow when in battle. This game really needed some polishing before release and for $25 it was not worth it. There is some enjoyment in this game especially when crushing someone's skull in and reigning victorious but I still don't recommend this game, but will definitely change this review if this game would get an update to fix how stupendously broken this game is. Expand
  13. Jan 24, 2013
    5
    Very very buggy, couldn't complete tutorial because the keys it told me to use, were NOT the keys I actually had to use. Upon trying to fix this, I ended up deleting the keybinding entirely with no way to reset it.
  14. Jan 25, 2013
    7
    I' m playing with unity , blender and udk myself, and from an indie developer perspective, I'm really impressed by this title: Visually stunning, great concept, great mechanics. What it lacks , for me, is about polishness. That you can feel from the tutorial : I stucked there for ages, before understanding that to start a training in the class session I had to press "i" instead of "e" , asI' m playing with unity , blender and udk myself, and from an indie developer perspective, I'm really impressed by this title: Visually stunning, great concept, great mechanics. What it lacks , for me, is about polishness. That you can feel from the tutorial : I stucked there for ages, before understanding that to start a training in the class session I had to press "i" instead of "e" , as displayed in the game tips messages. I'm also playing in italian, and some sentences are translated, while others not. I would have honestly not having the "italian" option, then (but steam setted automatically). About attacks etc, I feel everything is a bit buggy. To me, this could have been a really great title, if only coders had spend little more time on it, before actually selling the game. . My best compliments to the 3d artists and animators (animations, to me, looks great). I'm giving this opinion on the current version of the game, so I'm sure the title will improve. Expand
  15. Oct 28, 2012
    5
    Would be so much more fun were it not so buggy right now. As it is, it's more of a paid beta, than it is a game ready to be released. There are COUNTLESS situations where hits don't connect, enemies hit you when the strike is clearly going to miss, archer's bolts/arrows strike you when they should have missed, etc. This obviously comes down to lag issues, but if those aren't taken careWould be so much more fun were it not so buggy right now. As it is, it's more of a paid beta, than it is a game ready to be released. There are COUNTLESS situations where hits don't connect, enemies hit you when the strike is clearly going to miss, archer's bolts/arrows strike you when they should have missed, etc. This obviously comes down to lag issues, but if those aren't taken care of, then the game is flawed. And mind you, this is playing on servers where I have a 30-50 ping.
    In addition, your strikes get nullified way too easily. I understand this is trying to be realistic, but in reality, your attacks don't always have to follow the same exact plane of attack, regardless of surrounding variables. These variables include terrain obstacles around you, such as trees, rocks, or whatever, and teammates. You could switch to an overhead attack, or stab, and still find your attack nullified. The game is entirely too sensitive, and it becomes extremely frustrating to play. A little leeway would go a long way to making the game more enjoyable. I'm good at controlling my attitude while I play a "game", but this game constantly has me quitting in frustration, due to situations where I simply do not feel in control of my character, nor the situation itself. If you're looking for a medieval combat simulation, or anything even close to that, buy Mount & Blade Warband. This game simply wasn't ready for release. It's just too buggy, and needs too many optimizations to be a fully enjoyable experience. This is besides the fact that it runs like crap.
    Expand
  16. Nov 28, 2012
    5
    I really, REALLY wanted to like this game. War of the Roses was a great game, but no-one plays it because it had a bad start and steep learning curve and does not have attack and defend modes. So I really did want to like this.

    Summary: I picked this up for about £7, but, honestly, it's probably worth mroe like £5. It just feels like a poor, clunky mod. If it was faster and
    I really, REALLY wanted to like this game. War of the Roses was a great game, but no-one plays it because it had a bad start and steep learning curve and does not have attack and defend modes. So I really did want to like this.

    Summary: I picked this up for about £7, but, honestly, it's probably worth mroe like £5. It just feels like a poor, clunky mod. If it was faster and had better graphics it would be worth more.

    Positives:-

    Lots of people play it.
    It can be brilliant when people play as a team.
    It does feel quite medieval in spirit.
    The development team clearly want to fix the bugs that it has (which is a lot).
    Apparently they will release free updates, too.

    Cons:-

    1.Firstly, and most terribly, the game is slow-paced. And not in a good way. Just it takes you ages to get anywhere, it takes ages to swing weapons, and it takes ages to spawn. Even the menus are slow! (No, I don't have a slow computer.)
    2. The hit detection is terrible. People will hit you when they are nowhere near you or not even facing you. You will stab someone quite clearly yet "miss".
    3. It's very simple. There is almost no depth. War of the Roses had tonnes of depth from swing mechanics to where body armour is, to having to use certain kinds of weapons against certain kinds of body armour. This is hit/block/hit/block. Don't get me wrong, you can actually be skilled at the old hit and block, and timing is key, but that doesn't mean there is depth. There are a lot of skilled people at this game.
    4. The graphics are TERRIBLE. I can't believe people think they are good. The textures are AWFUL, to say the least. In all honesty, it looks like somewhere between a Half Life 1 and a Half Life 2 mod. It makes me wonder whether they imported their textures from the original mod.
    5. Bugs - there are a lot of them (even after the new patch), though I am confident the development team will fix them.

    If they released an HD texture package (could happen; it has for other games, and the devs seem to really want to make this game great) increased the quality of the hit detection, and made the pacing faster, then I think it would be a very fun game. Just, right now, it feels like a mod, not a fully-fledged game.

    I really wanted to like this, too!

    :-(
    Expand
  17. Nov 27, 2012
    5
    This game is just garbage, waste of my $25! Team based missions are frustrating when your teammates "accidentally" kill you when you are fighting one-on-one with someone, free-for-all is chaotic as **** every time you re-spawn there's a guy in a 10 foot radius from you, noticeable glitches and bugs that can distract from gameplay.... I will say this, if you're a fan of unrealistic gamesThis game is just garbage, waste of my $25! Team based missions are frustrating when your teammates "accidentally" kill you when you are fighting one-on-one with someone, free-for-all is chaotic as **** every time you re-spawn there's a guy in a 10 foot radius from you, noticeable glitches and bugs that can distract from gameplay.... I will say this, if you're a fan of unrealistic games like CoD this is the game for you. Expand
  18. Jan 24, 2013
    5
    The idea of the game is very good. But graphics are just average (they would be cool back in 2000's) and combat gameplay is bad...laggy...the controls sucks... hitting the target is a question of lucky...many bugs...well..this game is only for those who are really fans of this kind of stuff..Too bad, the idea of Medieval First Person Game is very cool and there is not many games. Could be better.
  19. Jan 2, 2013
    7
    I want to give this game a higher score but it would need more content or better game modes. I love the combat even if I get a bit frustrated at my sword passing through someone without dealing damage because, when you chop the whole arm off, you will laughing like a mad (wo)man. The combat could be worse though. So, I do give the developer some credit. This game is worth buying and playing.
  20. Jan 6, 2013
    7
    Overall, a good game for its price. The combat mechanics are nice, with a good use of shields and of the parry action. The graphics are pretty good, although the animation do seem a little slow from time to time (Especially when you absolutely HAVE to block that mother****ing battleaxe, but that your knight is too busy recovering from his previous strike to move...)

    On the really bad
    Overall, a good game for its price. The combat mechanics are nice, with a good use of shields and of the parry action. The graphics are pretty good, although the animation do seem a little slow from time to time (Especially when you absolutely HAVE to block that mother****ing battleaxe, but that your knight is too busy recovering from his previous strike to move...)

    On the really bad side, there's the archery system, which is horrible, and can mostly be summed up by "Random spam of arrows for 10 minutes", most of the time. A lot of glitches on the hitboxes, especially when trying to parry a blow.

    But I think the biggest problem this game has, is the extremely high learning curve required. The game doesn't have a lot of content, and you'll certainly abandon it before being any good on the battlefield sadly.
    Expand
  21. Jan 9, 2013
    5
    Decent game but needs some work. The modes in the game are pretty deceit. Always something new to check out. However, I cannot seem to change characters half way through a battle. Maybe it's my fault for not knowing how? Either way it should be improved in many basic features. No real skill involved. I played my first map and was in the second place spot by the end of the match. The secondDecent game but needs some work. The modes in the game are pretty deceit. Always something new to check out. However, I cannot seem to change characters half way through a battle. Maybe it's my fault for not knowing how? Either way it should be improved in many basic features. No real skill involved. I played my first map and was in the second place spot by the end of the match. The second game I won. Either I'm a pro at gaming (which I'm not), or hack 'n slash is far too easy in the game. Archery also needs loads of work. Plus no real incentive to want to keep playing besides bashing someones head in. Where are all the unlockables? Should have them in a game like this. However, regardless of its flaws this title is a fun few hours of your time. You'll enjoy hurting people but after a few hours you'll want more depth. More to do then just bash someones head in. This is why it only gets 5/10 Expand
  22. Mar 2, 2013
    7
    First of all, yes Chivalry is a fine game, especially for its price. You'll have fun the time needed to master the classes and the gameplay. Took me about 10-15hours.

    But then The game extremely boring. You'll notice more and more the flaws of the game, such as hits going through shields, or through clear pary. Or that the most effective way to win a game is to play Knight and spam
    First of all, yes Chivalry is a fine game, especially for its price. You'll have fun the time needed to master the classes and the gameplay. Took me about 10-15hours.

    But then The game extremely boring. You'll notice more and more the flaws of the game, such as hits going through shields, or through clear pary. Or that the most effective way to win a game is to play Knight and spam horizontal slashs in the melee. Yeah, super interesting.

    In other words, it is kind of the opposite of the "easy to learn, hard to master" motto Blizzard has; Chivalry is hard to learn, easy to master.

    Overall I would still recommend it for the shouts, decapitations and the fun you have during the ten first hours of the game, but would warn you about how you'll quickly grow bored of it.
    Expand
  23. Dec 28, 2012
    7
    this game is good in combat but the game must more fair about the map and less map in this game also fix about server count player. need more server in this game. should player avaiable to create server.
    better bot in single player. need campaigh for fun in single player. need more weapon shop or money
    to have more objective in game
    however i give this game 7 nice combat game!
  24. Dec 25, 2013
    5
    This game like fast-food. It's bad and unhealthy but it's so tasty.
    GOOD: Melee combat feels great, dark atmosphere, blood and gore(a lot), team objective matches.
    BAD: Hit boxes, balance of weapons and classes, game community(really bad...), bugged weapon unlocks. If you have short fuse, avoid like a plague! This game is the ultimate rage generator. I guarantee you will break your
    This game like fast-food. It's bad and unhealthy but it's so tasty.
    GOOD: Melee combat feels great, dark atmosphere, blood and gore(a lot), team objective matches.
    BAD: Hit boxes, balance of weapons and classes, game community(really bad...), bugged weapon unlocks.

    If you have short fuse, avoid like a plague! This game is the ultimate rage generator. I guarantee you will break your mouse and keyboard when you witness all bad sides of this game.
    Hard to recommend this game, but there is only a few first-person melee action games at this moment. So give it a try, when it's on Steam sale.

    P.S. Sorry for bad English.
    Expand
  25. Oct 16, 2012
    7
    This is not to bad but for sure not a 10. The graphics are fairly nice and the way the multiplayer works in regards to the little objectives is very unique. When is unfortunate to me is little to known customization and skins for the guys. Each team more or less looks the same just red or blue and slight helmet adjustments. Also I feel the weapons act more arcade like and play that wayThis is not to bad but for sure not a 10. The graphics are fairly nice and the way the multiplayer works in regards to the little objectives is very unique. When is unfortunate to me is little to known customization and skins for the guys. Each team more or less looks the same just red or blue and slight helmet adjustments. Also I feel the weapons act more arcade like and play that way also. I wish the game was slightly more historical, but iI understand that this is not how they planned it which is fine. It is a very hectic type of game which pretty much just relies on running up and flanking people and hitting them when they are fighting someone else to win. The blocking has a delay to and can not be held, which is fine for one on one but not to great when vs more than two. The archery is slightly disappointing and doesn't really feel like a real bow. Its still a good game to play and have fun with never the less, but I feel it is lacking quite a bit and is heavily over hyped by all the people on you tube who where given beta key to promote it. Expand
  26. Oct 24, 2012
    5
    This game will leave you frustrated - it is just too damn hard, and when there's good parts, they are too few and far between. Objectives are nice, but for the most part, you are dodging the opponent and swinging one of several weapon types. Of them, it seems that greatswords and pikes are the most OP, and I have no idea how the enemy can swing them so fast. Maybe its the server connectionThis game will leave you frustrated - it is just too damn hard, and when there's good parts, they are too few and far between. Objectives are nice, but for the most part, you are dodging the opponent and swinging one of several weapon types. Of them, it seems that greatswords and pikes are the most OP, and I have no idea how the enemy can swing them so fast. Maybe its the server connection issues, but when I swing, its too often out of reach, even if I"m running point blank to the person. . I wanted to like it, as it is something new in the genre, but the gameplay is just not for me. It is too clunky, yet fast paced. Save yourself 25$ and get this if it goes on sale, otherwise you may be as turned off as I was Expand
  27. Oct 17, 2012
    7
    As someone who stressed over whether to buy Chivalry or WOTR but ended up getting both, here is my review. Melee combat is great, there is a sense of satisfaction that comes with winning a fight, even when you lose you feel like you truly lost against that opponent (unless you've just been ganked which isn't fun), WOTR does however lack this sense of victory and loss when it comes to meleeAs someone who stressed over whether to buy Chivalry or WOTR but ended up getting both, here is my review. Melee combat is great, there is a sense of satisfaction that comes with winning a fight, even when you lose you feel like you truly lost against that opponent (unless you've just been ganked which isn't fun), WOTR does however lack this sense of victory and loss when it comes to melee combat. As a game it does lack the polish that I found in WOTR which is a very well rounded game but I hope that future content will rectify this. My only concern is that its price tag is disproportionate to what the game itself offers but as most (if not all) future content is meant to be available for free this should not be an issue. While is do love the melee combat system, at the moment that's pretty much all I like; a part of me wishes if only WOTR had chivalry's combat system, what a game that would be.. Chivalry does however have the makings of a great game, I'm looking forward to new content that they will release Expand
  28. Oct 30, 2012
    5
    I bought this game hoping for a good slasher similar to die by the sword (1998), and while the hit detection is ok, the mechanics are poor and the game itself is a complete bore. I'm glad to be supporting indie developers, but this game needs a lot of work before it could be considered fun.
  29. Nov 30, 2012
    6
    In simple War of the Roses much more enjoyable. This game is like a quake - run, hit, block, run. No mind. No depth. No team play. When I down in WoR and someone heal me - I FEEL we are the team. Here we just run together. WaR has horse combat and really large area. Here we have stages, but you can use only one and fight is in one place. In WaR there can be several fights far each fromIn simple War of the Roses much more enjoyable. This game is like a quake - run, hit, block, run. No mind. No depth. No team play. When I down in WoR and someone heal me - I FEEL we are the team. Here we just run together. WaR has horse combat and really large area. Here we have stages, but you can use only one and fight is in one place. In WaR there can be several fights far each from other. WaR meely combat is really deeper, it is not just press one button. You should select direction, charge. It is much harder, but much more enjoyable in the end. Customization is awesome, in WoR of course. If we compare game feeling I don't see here nothing comparable. Expand
  30. Jan 26, 2013
    6
    This game is extremely bad. Very buggy fighting system, unbelievably bad AI. One of the worst AI systems of all time. With 32 players and above it's lagging well enough. Nearly nothing good in it! This game is still in early beta stage or late alpha stage. I can't believe that so many human thinks that it's a good game. God's Zoo have soo many inhabitants. If you don't want to waste yourThis game is extremely bad. Very buggy fighting system, unbelievably bad AI. One of the worst AI systems of all time. With 32 players and above it's lagging well enough. Nearly nothing good in it! This game is still in early beta stage or late alpha stage. I can't believe that so many human thinks that it's a good game. God's Zoo have soo many inhabitants. If you don't want to waste your money DO NOT BY THIS GAME!!! It's bad like hell. Expand
  31. Nov 15, 2012
    7
    + Very meaty combat, Fun gameplay, gritty graphics suits the setting, Chopping heads is satisfying

    - Not enough content, lack of maps, lack of customizing, Awful server browser and matchmaking, My recommendation: Wait after the first big patch which hopefully gives some extra content and resolve the online issues.
  32. Nov 12, 2012
    6
    The game is the same free mod Age of Chivalry except now it's on the UT3 engine. It has slightly better graphics, some added combat features, and more weapons. The game is VERY buggy as of writing this and the game is its beta stage - It's not a polished product. The combat is pretty decent but it feels slow and clunky compared to Age of Chivalry. Combat seems to favour attack spam moreThe game is the same free mod Age of Chivalry except now it's on the UT3 engine. It has slightly better graphics, some added combat features, and more weapons. The game is VERY buggy as of writing this and the game is its beta stage - It's not a polished product. The combat is pretty decent but it feels slow and clunky compared to Age of Chivalry. Combat seems to favour attack spam more than accurate controlled hits and blocking/dodging. A lot of times due to bugs/lag or just flawed game mechanics combat is inaccurately depicted on your screen - Things like players blocking with shield before it's equipped and shown in their hand or someone parry/blocking an attack an no parry/blocking animation is shown or player's hitting you without facing you - stuff like that. Anyway it's not a horrible game and for $25 bucks it's pretty decent. If the dev team fixes all the bugs and issues like they say then I would give it a 8/10. Expand
  33. Jul 25, 2013
    6
    As much as I want to like this game, the frustrating parts of it really kill the fun of the game.

    first off, the idea is solid, it just was half-implemented. melee combat is interesting and they did add a little bit of depth into it, but it is far from being a well done combat system at all. beware of MANY issues with the combat, the biggest being lag, they have not addressed lag
    As much as I want to like this game, the frustrating parts of it really kill the fun of the game.

    first off, the idea is solid, it just was half-implemented. melee combat is interesting and they did add a little bit of depth into it, but it is far from being a well done combat system at all.

    beware of MANY issues with the combat, the biggest being lag, they have not addressed lag well enough, as a melee game is extremely intense and you MUST have split second control over your attacks. the lag in this game makes it VERY hard to properly land hits and block. not just that but many times, when you try to swing your weapon, it takes half a second for your character to actually start swinging, the input lag is variable, it can vary from no problem to holy crap, why is my guy acting so retarded? SWING THE DAMNED SWORD YOU STUPID IDIOT!

    I dont like how they implemented the level unlocks, it is completely UNnecessary, and it ruins the balance. there seem to be weapons that are just plain WAY better than the others, and you often see very high level players only using those.

    also, when it comes to parrying attacks, its a crapshot, sometimes the game lets you, other times it just decides to let the enemy's attack through, almost always ending up with you getting 1-shotted. not just that but the damage system seems a little out of whack, I remember getting 1-shotted many times while I had my TOWER shield up against the enemy, then they proceed to 1-shot me with a dagger... WHAT?!?

    This game is a buggy and laggy mess, I can see what they wanted to do with it, but the execution was sub-par, leaving many major issues that really kill the fun in the game.

    oh, one last thing, DONT TRY TO REBIND YOUR KEYS! it doesnt work... It will not rebind mouse buttons properly after the first setup, so if you choose something for your extra mouse buttons, its permanent, you cant change it.
    Expand
  34. Jan 26, 2013
    5
    Don't tell me this is a good game: I geve it 5 only because i consider it quite... "indie", but if it were a standard game, I would have gave it 3 or 4. 1. The gameplay consists in a mish-mash of blades and spears, where you only have to slash everyone that came near you or you find uncovered (your teammates are among them); 2. It is difficult to make tactics if you are sourrounded: youDon't tell me this is a good game: I geve it 5 only because i consider it quite... "indie", but if it were a standard game, I would have gave it 3 or 4. 1. The gameplay consists in a mish-mash of blades and spears, where you only have to slash everyone that came near you or you find uncovered (your teammates are among them); 2. It is difficult to make tactics if you are sourrounded: you are dead; 3. With these features, all melee virtuosoty become useless: just find an enemy overwhelmed and kill him.
    I don't want to criticize the graphic too much: it is simply too heavy for his performance.
    I also found the translation into my main lenguage quite bad and unfinished.
    Expand
  35. Jan 27, 2013
    7
    A unique and creative experience. The entire idea of a medieval based combat world is a great idea and it was certainly well executed. The problem is the ability to win with the old hack and slash strategy. Regardless of how high your skill level is, there will always be some people interrupting a battle slashing away randomly and getting an ungodly high score. It's incredibly easy toA unique and creative experience. The entire idea of a medieval based combat world is a great idea and it was certainly well executed. The problem is the ability to win with the old hack and slash strategy. Regardless of how high your skill level is, there will always be some people interrupting a battle slashing away randomly and getting an ungodly high score. It's incredibly easy to counter this on a solo fight, but in FFAs and anything higher than 2v1, it's impossible. Still that's in the hands of the players and not the fault of the game. The game just lacks replay value. I'm not very fond of playing this very often because it's not the most appealing thing I've ever played. It gets dull rather quickly and I'm only motivated to play every once in a while. Expand
  36. Feb 21, 2013
    7
    When the servers work, this game can be a lot of fun. There is still a lot of balancing to be done. Also, with modes like free for all, the frustration levels can climb very quickly. What is nice though is the tutorial, which gives you a quick overview of the keys and general game mechanics. Tbe melee fighting is pretty fun, but as I have never really played another melee game, I don'tWhen the servers work, this game can be a lot of fun. There is still a lot of balancing to be done. Also, with modes like free for all, the frustration levels can climb very quickly. What is nice though is the tutorial, which gives you a quick overview of the keys and general game mechanics. Tbe melee fighting is pretty fun, but as I have never really played another melee game, I don't have anything to judge it again. Worth the money if you have a few friends playing it. Expand
  37. Feb 23, 2013
    7
    Simply put this is a Call of Duty Medieval Warfare, containing total 4 different character classes and lots of brutal deathblows. Many of the weapons in the game are either axes or swords and you unlock more as you play the game. Probably the main problem in this game is the new players difficulty, its really hard to go up against players who have experienced more than you (Especially inSimply put this is a Call of Duty Medieval Warfare, containing total 4 different character classes and lots of brutal deathblows. Many of the weapons in the game are either axes or swords and you unlock more as you play the game. Probably the main problem in this game is the new players difficulty, its really hard to go up against players who have experienced more than you (Especially in Free-for-All and Duel). At some times you find yourself thinking that some of the game weapons are overpowered and unbalanced but that is not true at all. Every weapon has it own weaknesses and pro's. Too many people spend time spamming chat with useless complaints and insults towards other players.

    If you are not ready to spend quite some time training how this game works you might reconsider spending your money into this game.
    Expand
  38. Nov 22, 2012
    7
    A fun "simulation" of medieval combat, with a deep sense of grounding and attempted realism. The games only downside being its "price". At around 20 euro or 25 dollars the game is priced at a primium rate when considering the amount of content which is up on offer. There's no single player campaign and the multiplayer content is also slightly lacking.

    For starters the weapon unlock
    A fun "simulation" of medieval combat, with a deep sense of grounding and attempted realism. The games only downside being its "price". At around 20 euro or 25 dollars the game is priced at a primium rate when considering the amount of content which is up on offer. There's no single player campaign and the multiplayer content is also slightly lacking.

    For starters the weapon unlock content is basic and each class can fully unlock their primary weapon with in a few hours. There's no character customization, such as helmets or armour pieces. There's really very lettle going on in this game besides the actual gameplay..

    The gameplay, is definitely fun and challenging. Challenging because the combat is very clunky, the game does not really "play well" in terms of fighting game mechanics. There's no in depth fighting game system here and most of the challenge comes from just trying to land blow. The game is fun though because it is challenging and also very gory. When a blow does land the player is treated tia sensational spectacle of blood and gore which few games can mimic (especially in this day and age of games being targetted at mass markets). Heads explode, arms are removed and the death scenes are treated by sensationally funny sound effects.

    All in all I have to give it to this game, it's fun. I enjoy shooting an arrow into the face of an opponent and hearing a "thud" and then witnessing the poor fellow slump to the ground. It's just very unfortunate that the game lacks polish and content, almost to the point where it feels very much so like a "mod" instead of a stand alone product.
    Expand
  39. Dec 25, 2012
    7
    I haven't played WoR or Mount & Blade so I have no prior experience with medieval melee combat games. I bought this game because it looked hilarious and it was on sale for 13 bucks. Even at 13 bucks its not really worth it but I still enjoy the game for what it is. It's just a casual game where you can split skulls for 30 minutes. If I were reviewing this game at the $30 dollar retailI haven't played WoR or Mount & Blade so I have no prior experience with medieval melee combat games. I bought this game because it looked hilarious and it was on sale for 13 bucks. Even at 13 bucks its not really worth it but I still enjoy the game for what it is. It's just a casual game where you can split skulls for 30 minutes. If I were reviewing this game at the $30 dollar retail price I would say its not worth it. The graphics are dated, the performance optimization is questionable and I couldn't see myself playing this for more than an hour every couple of days because the game lacks depth. Also, the music is disgusting.

    Even with all its problems Chivalry is still fun and worth trying out if you can get it at a discount. The game modes are fun and sometimes if you get on a roll you can take out a large portion of the enemy team without dying. It's a decent game but I feel there is still a lot more work to be done. I hope this game sells well because it might mean more developers attempt to improve this style of multiplayer combat.
    Expand
  40. Jan 2, 2013
    5
    It has some good gamemodes, like objective, however the game is just a low skilled noob version of mount and blade, no manual blocking etc. I just spam lmb and come top of the scoreboards nigh on every game. In mount and blade you require teamwork, tactics, practise, skill, reflexes, in chivalry you only need a working index finger and a left mouse button.
  41. Dec 2, 2013
    7
    While it has the potential to be a great game it's plagued (for the better part of a year) by poor frame rate and lag, even on high end machines and the developer's apparent disinterest to remedy the situation is all the more reason to buy this game only when its on sale.
  42. Dec 20, 2012
    7
    At first I thought this game was not that great, I wasn't a fan of the strange pov and it seemed like combat was random, but after playing it a bit I have come to appreciate it and it is actually a lot of fun.
  43. Dec 15, 2012
    7
    I started off with this game only knowing what I had seen in videos, and in those said videos this game looked like a blast. The back-swing mechanic, the way your weapons actually have an arc to them, hit-boxes, etc. were all some of the major things I really looked forward to with this game.
    Within a week I purchased it, and within a week I could already tell that this was just going to
    I started off with this game only knowing what I had seen in videos, and in those said videos this game looked like a blast. The back-swing mechanic, the way your weapons actually have an arc to them, hit-boxes, etc. were all some of the major things I really looked forward to with this game.
    Within a week I purchased it, and within a week I could already tell that this was just going to be another easily-exploited PvP game. You will find yourself annoyed or even infuriated by this games distinct lack of balance. I understand where the developers were coming from, trying to make a realistic PvP medieval game, and I can respect that. But the lack of balance in this game makes a good portion of your games boring as your constantly slaughtered by Vanguards and Archers. So unless you plan to play as the aforementioned classes, prepare to be murdered over and over again by the same dude with a pole-axe.
    All in all this game is a blast when your allowed to have fun, the design, game-play, and even humor in this game makes it amazing, and when your alive, you will probably be laughing the entire time. But that is only a fraction of the time due to its lack of balance and easy exploits.
    Expand
  44. Sep 23, 2013
    7
    This game is fun, really fun. If you're good at it... New players will litterally be crushed in multiplayer, and the combat can feel very unfair in many places. Blocked? NOPE! Dodged? NOPE! Sometimes, when you are sure that you get hit, you don't! And those times where you think you dodged, YOU DON'T! And archers... god those archers, they are seriously annoying. WHO LET AN ARCHER IN THEThis game is fun, really fun. If you're good at it... New players will litterally be crushed in multiplayer, and the combat can feel very unfair in many places. Blocked? NOPE! Dodged? NOPE! Sometimes, when you are sure that you get hit, you don't! And those times where you think you dodged, YOU DON'T! And archers... god those archers, they are seriously annoying. WHO LET AN ARCHER IN THE ARENA?! IT MAKES NO SENSE! My advice, get really good at the game, and it will definetly be a blast. When you get the hang of it, the combat is very challenging, but incredibly satisfying. If you're bad at it, well you better bring some tissues then Expand
  45. Apr 21, 2013
    7
    At various points the game is epic and immersive displays with war cries, taunts and the presence of mutilations and beheadings, which makes the game even more exciting. However, the combat system is difficult and often confusing, it takes a lot of determination to get to grips with the attacks and defenses of each character class by the beginner player who starts the game at an extremeAt various points the game is epic and immersive displays with war cries, taunts and the presence of mutilations and beheadings, which makes the game even more exciting. However, the combat system is difficult and often confusing, it takes a lot of determination to get to grips with the attacks and defenses of each character class by the beginner player who starts the game at an extreme disadvantage compared to veterans. Expand
  46. Aug 17, 2013
    7
    The game is great! yes there are a few bugs and certain weapons seem to be overpowered but I feel that a few updates from now this game should be pitch perfect, what amazed me the most is how fluent and fast the combat is! One moment I'm on my feet the next moment I'm trying to find my head which is rolling on the floor due to the everyday man-at-arms halberd.
  47. Dec 28, 2013
    7
    It has very fun game-play, some people complain about that there is only four classes, but the way you can set them up makes them quite different for each player and the game-modes are all very different. However you need to spend a long, long time fixing all the major bugs that come with this near unfinished game that the lazy programmers never bothered to fix. The graphics andIt has very fun game-play, some people complain about that there is only four classes, but the way you can set them up makes them quite different for each player and the game-modes are all very different. However you need to spend a long, long time fixing all the major bugs that come with this near unfinished game that the lazy programmers never bothered to fix. The graphics and customization options are also very good.
    Enjoy!
    Expand
  48. Aug 3, 2013
    6
    Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is a multiplayer first person shooter where you join one of two factions: the Knights of Agatha, or the Masons. Matches include last man standing, team deathmatch, or team objective. The graphics are decent, with plenty of options for users to adjust their detail settings for their individual systems. The biggest problem I have with this game is that certainChivalry: Medieval Warfare is a multiplayer first person shooter where you join one of two factions: the Knights of Agatha, or the Masons. Matches include last man standing, team deathmatch, or team objective. The graphics are decent, with plenty of options for users to adjust their detail settings for their individual systems. The biggest problem I have with this game is that certain levels are actually unplayable if you try to play them without any human players. That's really stupid, considering that the game has been out for over a year. To make matters worse, the combat mechanics are kind of crappy. On many occasions I found myself getting hit when I know damn well that I was blocking, even with shields. Basically there's a block, then you have three strike types: overhead, a swing, and a stab. I snatched this game up on Steam during one of the sales. It's fun if you are playing a match with a ton of people, but don't get your hopes up too high. Expand
  49. Jun 6, 2013
    7
    Great game with best medieval combat mechanics made so far. You can block, feint, combo, stab, slash, kick, throw things, this is absolutely great. Sounds are heavy, realistic and help the immersion a lot. The combat is also quite bloody, you can chop off someone's limbs or head, so not for everyone's taste (I think you can disable the brutal combat visuals though). There is a vast amountGreat game with best medieval combat mechanics made so far. You can block, feint, combo, stab, slash, kick, throw things, this is absolutely great. Sounds are heavy, realistic and help the immersion a lot. The combat is also quite bloody, you can chop off someone's limbs or head, so not for everyone's taste (I think you can disable the brutal combat visuals though). There is a vast amount of weapons to choose from, 4 distinctive classes and many diffrent game modes ranging from simple deatmatches to sieges with catapults and ballistas Maps are interesting and there are a lot of them (for example an arena pit great for deatmatches). The graphics are not really that good, especially the maps look, well, quite ugly to be honest. Also I hate the game's music but hey you can turn it off (it's not Modern Warfare 3 where you couldn't Lol).
    Game has some problems with hit detections and lags, but it's not so drastic like some people claim.
    Solid game gets a solid 7/10 score.
    Expand
  50. Jun 6, 2013
    7
    This game isn't perfect but gives a nice combat system that's unlike most and the game is a great way to kill time. I recommend giving it a try and for how cheap you can get the game it's worth the investment. Just prepare to die A LOT!
  51. Nov 3, 2013
    7
    Its more like this is a great idea, and could be a fantastic game, but the devs aren't making that happen, i.e. the current execution is not ideal. I'd rather some experienced dev team take this idea and make it into what it can be. If the game works performance wise (i.e. you probably have a decent, with a year or two of age, gaming computer), then you can have a lot of fun, assuming youIts more like this is a great idea, and could be a fantastic game, but the devs aren't making that happen, i.e. the current execution is not ideal. I'd rather some experienced dev team take this idea and make it into what it can be. If the game works performance wise (i.e. you probably have a decent, with a year or two of age, gaming computer), then you can have a lot of fun, assuming you can get past the bugs, mainly those of the server browser (i.e. difficultly joining servers), and those in combat. Really, this game is best when you don't take it too seriously (because of gameplay bugs and balance), which is a problem for those looking to be competitive. The skill ceiling, despite the few simplifications and such the devs have made (possibly not on purpose), is still pretty high and there's almost always some cool new trick or maneuver or whatever you can learn. The game has seen a lot of patches, yet there seems to be a pattern: Fixing one things breaks another, sometimes meaning that an old bug is brought back. The dev team really seems inexperienced. They have poor communication with the community and poor transparency. Its seems to be a common enough thing that major patches have gradually decreased the performance of the game (optimization of the game never seems to have been visibly (and non-trivially) addressed). For example, the game is neigh unplayable for be now, in that load times are extraordinary (~3 minute launch times). Expand
  52. Jul 13, 2013
    7
    Its a good game, not great still needs some work. Amazing visuals for an indie game, but game-play is not smooth. I would say try the half life 2 mod first before you buy this (the mod is better) but if not, this is a good replacement if you are tired of shooting bullets.
  53. Dec 24, 2015
    7
    A game in which you take the combat system of Elder Scrolls and beat up other people with it. A very fun game. Muliplayer exclusive. The player is also able to customize your play style with multiple weapons and appearances, many different game types too.
  54. Sep 18, 2013
    7
    Get it on sale and it's worth it. Combat is kind of clunky and the controls aren't great but it is fun and has a lot of moves you can try to pull off. I prefer the archery/crossbows myself. It's entirely possible to one-shot people with well placed attacks.
  55. Aug 23, 2013
    6
    Would be much higher if it wasn't for all the bugs, exploits, low quantity of maps, weapons. Still no mod tools. It is very fun and addicting for what it is but has too many bugs to get a higher score.
  56. Jul 17, 2013
    6
    a frustrating rageing hard game were classes and weapons are over powered but get a bit fun when you learn to play more however its pretty original considering all people play usual are fps theses days
  57. Jun 14, 2014
    6
    The game was really fun for me at first, however, all the issues with netcode and hit detection ruin it. I have 100mbps connection and always join low ping servers and every other person is glitching all over the place and hitting me through my shield/sword when I am clearly past his reach or blocking on my screen. When I die and people are hitting my body, my body is usually ~5 feet awayThe game was really fun for me at first, however, all the issues with netcode and hit detection ruin it. I have 100mbps connection and always join low ping servers and every other person is glitching all over the place and hitting me through my shield/sword when I am clearly past his reach or blocking on my screen. When I die and people are hitting my body, my body is usually ~5 feet away on his screen and blood is splattering from the empty floor/ground on my screen.The people who are "lagging" usually have low pings, so I know it's the engine at fault.

    Also, whenever you want to change your class... you have to do it every game and every time you switch classes in-game. It does not save your "loadout" selection.

    If it wasn't for the terrible hit detection and loadout not saving, this game would easily be a 8 out of 10. There are more issues with the game and Torn Banner apparently "breaks the game even further with every update".

    This game is not worth the $30 asking price. Wait for it to be $10 or less if you must buy it.
    Expand
  58. Jun 5, 2014
    7
    It's really fun, but very hard. It also doesn't seem like it, but it's very demanding, I had to turn all of my settings to low to play it, and even then it lagged or glitched pretty often, getting me killed. During a free weekend I recommend playing it as much as you can, because that's when all the newbies are playing, and it's not nearly as frustrating. This game isn't for everyone.
  59. Nov 6, 2014
    6
    I'm not going to lie, overall this game is very fun. If you just want to relax (maybe you had a hard day at the office) and vent some stress, this is the game for you. Chop a few heads, arms, and legs off and you'll be feeling great in no time! Despite the game's entertainment value, it really lacks some key aspects. Most glaringly, I find that for casual gamers such as myself the gameI'm not going to lie, overall this game is very fun. If you just want to relax (maybe you had a hard day at the office) and vent some stress, this is the game for you. Chop a few heads, arms, and legs off and you'll be feeling great in no time! Despite the game's entertainment value, it really lacks some key aspects. Most glaringly, I find that for casual gamers such as myself the game begins to lose its charm after you exceed the levels of rookie servers. Then you get to enter the world of over competitive players. I'm not too bad of a player but it's impossible to tell what servers can give you balanced matches. Since there's not matchmaking, and highly skilled person can drop into a casual server and completely ruin the balance of the game. Other minor annoyances include team killers, various small glitches, slightly over powered weapons *cough cough maul* and so on. However, I can't deny the game has gotten the core aspects down. I haven't encountered a better hack-and-slash/ melee game for ages. If you're willing to spend the money, by all means have fun, but don't expect anything extraordinary. Expand
  60. Jun 22, 2016
    7
    There are few decent options for either medieval combat or first-person melee games out there. Chivalry is far from perfect and could really use some updating instead of them just moving on to release another game, but as it is you could do a lot worse. Two teams, four classes and an impressive library of swords, axes, maces, spears, bows, crossbows and so on. Map design is pretty decent,There are few decent options for either medieval combat or first-person melee games out there. Chivalry is far from perfect and could really use some updating instead of them just moving on to release another game, but as it is you could do a lot worse. Two teams, four classes and an impressive library of swords, axes, maces, spears, bows, crossbows and so on. Map design is pretty decent, and the melee system itself is fairly complex: difficult to learn, but very rewarding if mastered. The voice work is pretty amusing: You will hear almost constant, comically long yelling from people as they charge into battle. Be sure to look for servers that cap the number of archers there can be on a team, or risk being buried in arrows by people too chicken to swordfight. Expand
  61. Apr 24, 2018
    7
    oyun zor,evet zor, lan baya zor
    *grafikleri güzel,eğlenceli,bir mod yapımına göre gayet zevk veriyor,
    *oynanış harika, hemen gaza geliyorsunuz hele ki bir kaç kol bacak kopardıysanız pc başında başlıyorsunuz naralar atmaya (bağırarak oynamak daha zevkli) *oyunda yazılı iletişim haricinde sesle iletişim de var isterseniz oyunun içerisindeki başırışlrı kapatıp kendi performansınızı
    oyun zor,evet zor, lan baya zor
    *grafikleri güzel,eğlenceli,bir mod yapımına göre gayet zevk veriyor,
    *oynanış harika, hemen gaza geliyorsunuz hele ki bir kaç kol bacak kopardıysanız pc başında başlıyorsunuz naralar atmaya (bağırarak oynamak daha zevkli)
    *oyunda yazılı iletişim haricinde sesle iletişim de var isterseniz oyunun içerisindeki başırışlrı kapatıp kendi performansınızı katabiliyorsunuz tabi komşu sorununuz yok ise :)
    *arenalar çok kalabalık olabiliyor size bu serverda yüzlerce kişi var bu oyun değil savaş hissi yaşatabiliyor
    *öyle taktik falan yok arkadaş, git geber daha ne bekliyorsun :)
    *bazen düşman baskın gelirse ve sizi bir alana sıkıştırırsa geriliyorsunuz ben bunu yaşıyorum ve daha agresif oluyorum.
    *savaş ortamı olur da kol bacak yerinde durur mu? grafiksel olarak şahane olmasa da düşmana verilen zaiyat güzel hazırlanmış tüm eklemler kopabiliyor her yerden kan fışkırıyor hele kafa koparken bir de sesi geliyor harika bir duygu
    *iyice psikopata bağlamış lan bu diyeceksiniz ama oyunun amacı bu zaten. iyi stres attırıyor. güzelce eğleniyorsunuz ve pc'yi kapatıp hiç birşey olmamış az önce kimseyi boğazlamamış gibi normal hayatınıza devam ediyorsunuz :)
    *oyunu 5 saat kadar oynadım ama hiç sıkılmadım. onlarca kes yenildim bir kez yendim ama stres yapmadım. düşmana bağırarak koşman bile yetiyor.
    düşmanın seviyesi falan önemli değil amaç doğru zamanda hamlenizi yapmak. en kral oyuncuyu bile gövdesinden ayırabilirsiniz.

    ben oyunu enpara indirimleri zamanında 3 liraya evet sadece 3 lira gibi komik bir rakama aldım doya doya oynuyorum. indirim zamanı 6 lira gibi bir rakama düşüyor alıp zevkle oynayabilirsiniz.
    ilk başlarda dikkat edin düşman diye kendi adamlarınızı öldürürseniz bazı özel serverlardan atılabiliyorsunuz.
    ping süresine de dikkat edin oyunda ping baya önemli. nedensebu oyunun motoru ile yapılan oyunlarda ping süresinin önemi çok belirgin olabiliyor. (yanlış bilmiyorsam half life motoru ile yapıldı)
    oyunda herhangi bir servera girip oynayabilirsiniz nadiren de olsa türk arkadaşlar denk gelebiliyor ama konuşma yazışma pek önemsenmediği için ve yapılması gerek görevler çok belirgin olduğu için her hangi bir servera girip rahatça oynayabiliyorsunuz.
    Expand
  62. Aug 23, 2021
    5
    Interesting content as it is the predecessor of 'Mordhau' and many other great medieval fighting games. The gameplay truly makes 'Chivalry: Medieval Warfare' worth it. Maps are as terrific as varied, the access to the Steam Workshop contributes to enhance the game as a whole. Weapons feeling is awesome and the way you manage to obliterate your opponents is definitely satisfying. GraphicsInteresting content as it is the predecessor of 'Mordhau' and many other great medieval fighting games. The gameplay truly makes 'Chivalry: Medieval Warfare' worth it. Maps are as terrific as varied, the access to the Steam Workshop contributes to enhance the game as a whole. Weapons feeling is awesome and the way you manage to obliterate your opponents is definitely satisfying. Graphics are not that terrible despite the 2012 release. Game modes are numerous and I found the 'team objectives' the most interesting. Interacting with environment feels great. The few customization there is is okay.

    Unfortunately all these great features are cancelled by major flaws. Where to begin?
    - The level of toxicity of the community? Once you passed level 15, you can't go back to regular 'noobs' servers and you have to play with hardcore gamers, a bunch of try-harders who each spent more than 1,000 hours on 'Chivalry' and will destroy you over and over, sometimes instantly from your respawn point.
    - The detestable classes system? There are four of them, each with some interesting mechanics but surely you will soon hate vanguards with their insane range and scope in addition to their gigantic health bar and defense, and archers which remain on top of the fight to grind some easy kills here and there.
    - The inconsistent FPS? Even if I always played with a decent ping, I kept having major lags and bugs. And troubles like these can easily make you die.
    - The ranking system? You get points when you kill. You can do all the damages of the game, if you don't manage to kill opponents the game says you deserve no point. That's why I love objectives so much because you can easily see who is playing cleverly and who doesn't. Plus the vanguard and knight classes can one-shot kill so they easily steal your preys when you inflict less damage (as a man-at-arm for example).
    - The friendly fire? Is always on. And you can't prevent allies to get right in front of your blade during melees -> you kill them and get penalized.
    - The customizable colour of characters? Some funny kids decide to customize their characters with the colors of the other team, which prevents us from noticing that they are enemies. Yeah, I'm talking about you yellow guy. I'm going to find you.
    - A little story mode as a tutorial would have been amazing.
    Expand
  63. Jun 26, 2021
    7
    Juego muy entretenido para jugar una partida de vez en cuando o una pequeña viciada con amigos.

    Destaca en lo más importante para este tipo de género, que es en el puro gameplay, el manejo de los personajes, el de las armas en todas sus variedades y el trabajo hecho en los escenarios es muy destacable en todos sus aspectos. Si este juego hubiese existido tal cual hace muchos años
    Juego muy entretenido para jugar una partida de vez en cuando o una pequeña viciada con amigos.

    Destaca en lo más importante para este tipo de género, que es en el puro gameplay, el manejo de los personajes, el de las armas en todas sus variedades y el trabajo hecho en los escenarios es muy destacable en todos sus aspectos.

    Si este juego hubiese existido tal cual hace muchos años atrás sería de 10, sin embargo considero que a día de hoy un juego online tiene que ir mucho más allá del propio gameplay, y aquí es donde el título no aporta absolutamente nada.

    Solo tiene una tienda mediocre de skins y por destacar también un tutorial decente. Fin, ni sistemas de eventos, un sistema de amigos/grupos con muchos bugs y que empeora la experiencia... No hay rankings de ningún tipo.

    Echo de menos algún ranking o sistema que te genere ese deseo de mejorar y jugar más, no hay nada de esto.

    Si buscas un juego con el que pasar el rato, recomendadísimo. Si te encantan los counter strike pero te gustan las espadas, pues es un 10 obviamente. Si no, pues no te va a gustar el juego.

    Ah, y a destacar la no censura, muy buen sistema de sangre, desmembramientos etc...
    Expand
  64. Apr 29, 2022
    6
    6/10. The weapons don't feel responsive. Fighting isn't intuitive. There is far too much weapon variety. The game is too competitive to have such sloppy gameplay.
  65. Aug 8, 2021
    5
    ⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 24 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 24
  2. Negative: 0 out of 24
  1. Feb 26, 2013
    70
    A multiplayer experience that offers a realistic point of view of the Medieval melee battles. It's not fit for everyone, but if you get past the glitches and the high difficulty curve, you'll find an enjoyable and addictive game.
  2. PC Master (Greece)
    Feb 4, 2013
    80
    Chivalry is slightly… bipolar. The spectacle of a duel (especially if the two opponents are seasoned veterans) can be spectacularly breath-taking, a complex choreography that one can only marvel at. Blocks, feints, slashes, back-steps, side-hits: despite initial impressions, this can be a truly intellectual game of tactics, requiring high skills, observation and deviousness. On the other hand, the spectacle of a massive battle of fifty warriors can be ridiculously chaotic: especially if the players are inexperienced and go for blind “hack and slash” tactics, it’s more like a metal concert mosh pit than a battle for glory and honor. [February 2013]
  3. PC Gamer
    Feb 1, 2013
    81
    Chivalry is Quake to War of the Roses' Battlefield, and those seeking a faster-paced bloodier experience will undoubtedly prefer Chivalry's type of steel. [March 2013, p.65]