Chivalry: Medieval Warfare

 PC
User Score
7.7

Generally favorable reviews- based on 972 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 650 out of 972
  2. Mixed: 213 out of 972
  3. Negative: 109 out of 972

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Autumn
    Jul 21, 2013
    9
    This game is addictive and can make the hours fly by. One minute you'll be cackling evily, the next you'll be slamming your mouse in fury. Fun stuff aside, the game is buggy, and pretty heavy on the system resources considering how it looks. That said, it's an indie title and you expect that going in. All things considered, Chivalry is very solid and addictive title that's definitely worthThis game is addictive and can make the hours fly by. One minute you'll be cackling evily, the next you'll be slamming your mouse in fury. Fun stuff aside, the game is buggy, and pretty heavy on the system resources considering how it looks. That said, it's an indie title and you expect that going in. All things considered, Chivalry is very solid and addictive title that's definitely worth $6 on a steam sale.… Expand
  2. treetops42
    Jul 21, 2013
    10
    It's hard but very fun, you can never know everything about this game. They are always adding new mapsweapons content for free. Custom map making also just came out. So users can make their own maps. Big community always able to find full games in seconds.
  3. MessengerX
    Jul 20, 2013
    3
    Buggy tutorial immediately put me in a bad mood towards this game. I gave them a couple of points for having an innovative "swing" system. It's better than Elder Scrolls attack method. Unfortunately this is literally a hack and slash game. A couple of hits and you die. Should have gone fantasy, because realism sucks in this game.

    They are trying to create something akin to MMO shooters,    Buggy tutorial immediately put me in a bad mood towards this game. I gave them a couple of points for having an innovative "swing" system. It's better than Elder Scrolls attack method. Unfortunately this is literally a hack and slash game. A couple of hits and you die. Should have gone fantasy, because realism sucks in this game.

    They are trying to create something akin to MMO shooters, but the need to be in close combat at all times just means that if you are outnumbered, you will die. You can only defend against one attack at a time, basically, so two or more attackers will kill you quick. Respawn is similar to other shooters, it just depends on when you die and where the counter was at at the time. Then there is a long boring run back to the battle. Why this sucks is because at least in Red Orchestra or COD you fight from a ranged distance. This is also why games like Elder Scrolls don't thrust you into endless waves of creatures attacking all at once. At least in fantasy games you have the benefit of magic for defense and offense as well.

    The game also plays in a windowed mode. This wasn't exactly a deal breaker for me, but it was annoying. The animations were okay, but timing blocks, which is a major part of this game, is sluggish at times. Basically this is all in the mouse. Your movement is still WASD, but everything else uses all your mouse buttons. If you don't have five mouse buttons, do not even try.

    I bought this on sale at Steam for $10 and I would really like to demand my money back. Like a few other reviewers I was surprised at how high this game scored. My guess is 90% of these reviews came within the initial purchase and few hours of play with the hope that it would get better. Leveling doesn't do much for you but get you new weapons to swing with. It gets very monotonous after awhile, click 1, click 2, block, click 3, click 1, block.... Oh yeah and die like every thirty or forty seconds.

    This game might be better with a group of players who are all on headsets and communicating, but all I saw was a bunch of people running around swinging at everything, including their teammates. Like many shooters with friendly fire, count on some moron constantly running in front of your swings/shots as well. As a 4-5 layer co-op effort, this game could have been awesome. But thirty fighting each other in very close quarters, even outdoors, just becomes a chaotic nightmare. Anyone who thinks this is how medieval wars took place is just flat out crazy. There are no skirmish lines in this game, no waves of archers followed by foot soldiers, and no artillery that I saw (but perhaps that was a different type of battle I didn't play). Instead, they call it realism when thirty people with no coordinated effort charge in and start swinging like crazy. Viking pillagers were more organized than this.

    The biggest problem I saw here is that there is no commander, be it a King or a General of some sort. A good system would have been to have a team leader that controlled who, which of the four characters (Archer, Man-at-Arms, Knight and Skirmisher) and how many would be available in a pool that you have to choose from when you respawn. I saw games where there was little to no archer support, and knights were just wading into battle all alone, instead of being backed up by people with pole arms. Every man for themselves doesn't really work in these types of "slashers," but how do you avoid it if there isn't even the slightest semblance of a command structure. Often you have to defend three objectives, such as your catapults, which seemed to be unused, but there is no way of directing people to spread out appropriately. This may seem like an issue of the people who play it, rather than the game itself, but I can see no real way to remedy this without some sort of command structure. What's really annoying is that if you know anything about strategy in warfare, this game is just going to tick you off with every battle.

    I had eyed this game suspiciously for few months, and after reading the reviews here I bought it on sale. Like I said, I would pitch a fit to get my money back if it were possible. This is basically one of those online games you play in a browser converted into something that looks like a professional game. I think some of these complaints are partly due to the people it attracts. Serious gamers won't be messing around with this. It pales in comparison to games like Red Orchestra and even, dare I say, WOW (which I absolutely hate). If you want to play a pedantic time waster for a few days, pick this up. Otherwise I would spend the money on a single player medieval themed game, or some sort of RTS if you are absolutely jonesing for medieval fighting. The positive reviews of this game are misleading, If they use words like "epic" and "awesomeness" it's probably best to stay away. I certainly learned my lesson about how to read these reviews from now on. It's a lowest common denominator issue IMO.    … Expand
  4. vvhite
    Jul 19, 2013
    8
    The word "visceral" gets thrown around far too often when describing video games. However, in the case of chivalry, that's all that needs to be said. The combat is weighty and brutal. I wouldn't say it has the thumping precision of a game like Dark Souls, but for a first person hand to hand combat multiplayer game, (not that there are many options out there lol) this is about as good asThe word "visceral" gets thrown around far too often when describing video games. However, in the case of chivalry, that's all that needs to be said. The combat is weighty and brutal. I wouldn't say it has the thumping precision of a game like Dark Souls, but for a first person hand to hand combat multiplayer game, (not that there are many options out there lol) this is about as good as it gets. The visuals are also a very nice touch. Great art direction, textures, dynamic lighting and physics. This game is constantly on sale and you can pick it up on Steam for a very good price these days. BUY IT!… Expand
  5. Korbio12
    Jul 17, 2013
    8
    This game is sort of stupid, but in the Garry's Mod way, as in it's a stupidly fun time! The game is absolutely hilarious, with the various knights shouting and flailing their swords everywhere! The only downside is that it's buggy, but that's not even close to a deal breaker. Recommended!
  6. toaddy07
    Jul 17, 2013
    6
    a frustrating rageing hard game were classes and weapons are over powered but get a bit fun when you learn to play more however its pretty original considering all people play usual are fps theses days
  7. stranglehold
    Jul 13, 2013
    7
    Its a good game, not great still needs some work. Amazing visuals for an indie game, but game-play is not smooth. I would say try the half life 2 mod first before you buy this (the mod is better) but if not, this is a good replacement if you are tired of shooting bullets.
  8. mybadgamertag
    Jul 13, 2013
    0
    Anyone who thinks the combat is 'unique' or that it takes 'skill' is delusional. The poor game mechanics and terrible hit detection alongside animations and unimaginative objective based games make this a 1 out of 10 at best. Poor hit detection and terribly implemented combat has been mistaken for 'fast paced high skill requirement'.
  9. mobridomble
    Jul 8, 2013
    4
    This game has a lot of great things going for it, which is why it's a shame that it's challenges overshadow many of those. Combat system requires finesse and offers a decent array of weaponry but is glitchy and often out of sink with the picture. The maps are great but offer unseen traps where characters get stuck on scenery. The UI could use some work, most notably the Find Server screen,This game has a lot of great things going for it, which is why it's a shame that it's challenges overshadow many of those. Combat system requires finesse and offers a decent array of weaponry but is glitchy and often out of sink with the picture. The maps are great but offer unseen traps where characters get stuck on scenery. The UI could use some work, most notably the Find Server screen, which is perhaps the glitchiest thing of all.

    If you can get the game to work you have a tremendous wealth of multiplayer combat, most of which will be spent fending off your own team mates. This game is packed with team killing.

    I want to love this game, and I play it over and over again in the hopes that just once I'll leave a session happy. They only tend to end in frustration, however.    … Expand
  10. mephage
    Jul 1, 2013
    8
    At first you find yourself in hysterics over the sounds and atmosphere in this game that make it so fun. However, shortly you'll find yourself really getting in to the combat. For me this is a unique game that will hopefully lead to a whole new niche genre of medieval FPS games. Awesome fun!
  11. dudenolan
    Jun 29, 2013
    2
    Very poor game, combat is slow and very fiddly. Tried it for an hour before realising how dump it was then tried for another half an hour before giving in. Even at£6.99 on steam I feel like ive been robbed. Scored it 2 for trying to be original
  12. electricspit
    Jun 27, 2013
    10
    Definitely get this game.

    It is the most well thought out, put together game I've played in a long time. Personally, it has infinite replay value and only gets more fun. There is blood, guts, exploding heads, fisting, and requires a ton of skill.

    I recommend this game to everyone I know who enjoys video games, and I've heard no complaints yet!
  13. Brosman
    Jun 23, 2013
    8
    Fun and challenging. To play well in this game it requires teamwork, patience, and timing. If you don't want to learn how the weapons work, or don't want to have the patience it takes to win these fights as most one on one fights take a few minutes, you wont like this game. It takes a while to get used to but its worth putting in the time.
  14. werwolf
    Jun 18, 2013
    8
    Graphics 8/10
    Game Play 9/10
    Originality 10/10 Sounds 10/10 Interface 4/10 Controlability 10/10 Learning Curve 9/10 Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is one of the easiest games to jump in and have a blast, but the learning curve for new players is very hard. Most new players swing left click over and over again without thought or strategies; this is a mistake. Hell most of the    Graphics 8/10
    Game Play 9/10
    Originality 10/10
    Sounds 10/10
    Interface 4/10
    Controlability 10/10
    Learning Curve 9/10

    Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is one of the easiest games to jump in and have a blast, but the learning curve for new players is very hard. Most new players swing left click over and over again without thought or strategies; this is a mistake. Hell most of the reviews that were low score were made my "gamers" that never understood the true versatility of the game.

    Most of these reviews were written before the major updates to the game. The devs have added to the 3 main attacks(right shoulder overhand, horizontal swing right to left, and a stab), now you can swing horizontally left to right and swing an overhand from the opposite shoulder. This adds depth to the game and makes defending and attacking more versatile. The beta was full of glitches and problems affecting game play, 90% of them have been fixed.

    I'm level 35 with 450 hours in the game, i know this game forwards and backwards and the ability to adjust you swings by slowing them down and speeding them up with a movement of your mouse is one of the greatest innovations in a game in many years. Hell you can lean forward and backwards at the waist to do a matrix lean back dodge or duck under an enemies swing. This adds so much to the game in the way of learning curve. Not only do you have to hit someone that is dodging under and around your strikes but you have to dodge around there swings as you miss over there head and they come in at close range to hit you while your still swinging your whiffed strike.

    This is a real time strategy game with twitch based game play, but you wont see all this till at least 10-15 hours in the game. Normally around level 15 is when people start to "see" the animations of the characters as second nature and react instantly to the swings. I have never played a multi-player game that was harder to master and more rewarding to learn in. There's nothing quite like pulling off a new move in combat and getting it to work at the dismay and of the enemies in the game.

    There's a lot more to the game then people think. For example, when preforming an overhead attack(alt overhead is best) the swing starts behind you. If you jump at your opponent and turn 180 degrees around(back to them) and swing a overhead in the air while leaning backwards you can hit your opponent with your back turned to them. This sounds a bit ridiculous, and it is, but its not easy to do(100 hours of toying with it for it to work right and look smooth). I gave this example to show that the reviewers have NO CLUE how in-depth the melee combat is. Our group of player, |MonK|, has formed its own style in the game were we do 360's while jumping and swinging, mind you that it does not look glitched or break the game by exploit. It is very hard to do and takes way to much practice, but the rewards of being able to preform a perfect 360 to reverse 180 to 360 while swinging and hit them is all worth the time.

    THIS GAME IS HARD TO MASTER!!!! TRY TILL LEVEL 15 TO GET A FULL VIEW OF THE GAME.

    In closing i would say buy this game, its only 25 bucks and that is very cheap for the gameplay it offers. There are lots of games made by AAA developers that cant stand toe to toe with the epic gameplay and utter controlability of this game.

    Hope this helped,
    |MonK| Werwolf    … Expand
  15. Dethstar
    Jun 17, 2013
    2
    By far the worst hack n slash. Medieval combat based game I have ever played. Mediocre graphics and probably the worst and most repetitive combat mechanics since Mortal online did us all the favor of dying out. The fact I can compare a game of this genre to an MMO is sad in itself.

    The one redeeming feature is the use of siege engines but even that feels dull and unresponsive. This    By far the worst hack n slash. Medieval combat based game I have ever played. Mediocre graphics and probably the worst and most repetitive combat mechanics since Mortal online did us all the favor of dying out. The fact I can compare a game of this genre to an MMO is sad in itself.

    The one redeeming feature is the use of siege engines but even that feels dull and unresponsive. This is medieval combat dumbed down to below anything I can ever remember playing..

    I could find no bugs and found servers easily which each deserve a point.    … Expand
  16. Banskel
    Jun 14, 2013
    10
    Out of the other medieval games; mount and blade, war of the roses, etc, Chivalry is far the best game ever created! The gameplay and combat mechanics are truly amazing. With news and update every week by the developers and a good community, this game has potential.
  17. trevorobil
    Jun 9, 2013
    10
    One of the best games I have ever played. Anyone who writes bad review on this game probably has a crappy computer that doesn't run it well. The game is awesome if your computer can handle graphics.
  18. Zyromkiru
    Jun 6, 2013
    7
    This game isn't perfect but gives a nice combat system that's unlike most and the game is a great way to kill time. I recommend giving it a try and for how cheap you can get the game it's worth the investment. Just prepare to die A LOT!
  19. Blackhamer
    Jun 6, 2013
    7
    Great game with best medieval combat mechanics made so far. You can block, feint, combo, stab, slash, kick, throw things, this is absolutely great. Sounds are heavy, realistic and help the immersion a lot. The combat is also quite bloody, you can chop off someone's limbs or head, so not for everyone's taste (I think you can disable the brutal combat visuals though). There is a vast amountGreat game with best medieval combat mechanics made so far. You can block, feint, combo, stab, slash, kick, throw things, this is absolutely great. Sounds are heavy, realistic and help the immersion a lot. The combat is also quite bloody, you can chop off someone's limbs or head, so not for everyone's taste (I think you can disable the brutal combat visuals though). There is a vast amount of weapons to choose from, 4 distinctive classes and many diffrent game modes ranging from simple deatmatches to sieges with catapults and ballistas Maps are interesting and there are a lot of them (for example an arena pit great for deatmatches). The graphics are not really that good, especially the maps look, well, quite ugly to be honest. Also I hate the game's music but hey you can turn it off (it's not Modern Warfare 3 where you couldn't Lol).
    Game has some problems with hit detections and lags, but it's not so drastic like some people claim.
    Solid game gets a solid 7/10 score.    … Expand
  20. Silver1138
    May 31, 2013
    9
    Fun. Hillarious, roaring fun. It's funny that in an industry devoted to fun, it is rare to find a game that makes you laugh out loud, even as your head and various body parts are scattered all over a grassy plain where birds sing blissfully over the carnage. Of course there are glitches and bugs, more than you would expect to find in an AAA title, but this is NOT an AAA title, it's anFun. Hillarious, roaring fun. It's funny that in an industry devoted to fun, it is rare to find a game that makes you laugh out loud, even as your head and various body parts are scattered all over a grassy plain where birds sing blissfully over the carnage. Of course there are glitches and bugs, more than you would expect to find in an AAA title, but this is NOT an AAA title, it's an indie game which has managed to be more enjoyable than many "big names" out there. In multiplayer. Someone mentioned "sub-par" sound in an otherwise very positive review. For me, it's one of the strongest points of the game. The sound of steel clashing with steel or thudding against shield is as epic as the over the top battle cries and taunts are hillarious. And the melee combat, despite the glitches, is still the best I've seen in any medieval themed videogame to date, hands down.… Expand
  21. Archenix
    May 29, 2013
    0
    Don't buy it, this game has only high price, nothing more.
    Combat system disaster, laggy multiplayer, very bad optimization. This game should have such high score. Its one huge disaster.
  22. otchy
    May 27, 2013
    10
    I don't normally write reviews for games..but this one I had to. This is the most fun I've had with any game in a long time. It's like Counter Strike but with swords and shields. The blocking system is awesome but a bit hard to master. The all out slaughter fest makes me laugh and giggle. The gore, lopping peoples heads off, getting your own damn head lopped off makes me chuckle. It's allI don't normally write reviews for games..but this one I had to. This is the most fun I've had with any game in a long time. It's like Counter Strike but with swords and shields. The blocking system is awesome but a bit hard to master. The all out slaughter fest makes me laugh and giggle. The gore, lopping peoples heads off, getting your own damn head lopped off makes me chuckle. It's all very well done. I got it on sale but knowing how awesome this game is I'd pay full price. I've so far only put 5 hours in. I have played a couple team games but I normally hit up the all for all type. The weapon leveling system is really cool too as it allows me to go out of my comfort zone of weapons I prefer and try out others. I highly recommend this game.… Expand
  23. cristiano110
    May 23, 2013
    9
    The game is the one of the best I've ever had, and I actualy play more than BF3, or other big games.
    It's very good, and it's not very easy to play, than you will have different levels of duels while playing multiplayer.
    I would pay $50 or more for it. The producers are always trying to make the game better, and releasing new game content. The only bad is that you can see some bugs,    The game is the one of the best I've ever had, and I actualy play more than BF3, or other big games.
    It's very good, and it's not very easy to play, than you will have different levels of duels while playing multiplayer.
    I would pay $50 or more for it. The producers are always trying to make the game better, and releasing new game content. The only bad is that you can see some bugs, 'cause its and Indie game.    … Expand
  24. davidxstinger
    May 21, 2013
    8
    excellent jeux de combat medieval beau graphisme gameplay sympat un tres beau jeux .
    je le recommande a ceux qui en ont mare de battlefield ou autre call of duty .
    par contre ce jeux n ai pas fait pour les enfants de moins de 15 ans
  25. luisfg99
    Apr 26, 2013
    10
    It's a very good game!! You need much skill for play this game... It have a lot of tactics and goals! The gameplay is awesome. It's a really Medieval Warfare!
  26. K3npachi
    Apr 26, 2013
    1
    The most annoying game I've ever played.
    Only two class rule the servers (vanguard, knight), archer is so lame I cant see far just 50m, cant kick with bow I can't block with bow, the weapon change is really slow...
    I can't block some attack with secondary weapon.
    This game is sucks, waste of my money.
  27. dustyogd
    Apr 26, 2013
    9
    If you are into medieval games than this is a game for you. the sounds in the games are great from sword hitting each other to peoples wars cry's it really makes you feel like your in a medieval battle field. The Multiplayer is really fun the highest server so far is 64 and the game comes with many different game modes like CTF, Siege, Arena, and lots more also costume maid maps by theIf you are into medieval games than this is a game for you. the sounds in the games are great from sword hitting each other to peoples wars cry's it really makes you feel like your in a medieval battle field. The Multiplayer is really fun the highest server so far is 64 and the game comes with many different game modes like CTF, Siege, Arena, and lots more also costume maid maps by the community. Now if you play offline then you in bad luck because your in bad luck because the AI are some what bad and sometimes don't act right.… Expand
  28. jlol13
    Apr 23, 2013
    9
    First of all, since the launch of this game, the developers have already released a free expansion with 4 new weapons and a bunch of new maps and game types. Secondly, it is the ONLY game of its kind! The learning curve may be a little steep, since like I said, its one of a kind. But the combat system is really great. Imagine you are a poleaxe wielding vanguard having a one on oneFirst of all, since the launch of this game, the developers have already released a free expansion with 4 new weapons and a bunch of new maps and game types. Secondly, it is the ONLY game of its kind! The learning curve may be a little steep, since like I said, its one of a kind. But the combat system is really great. Imagine you are a poleaxe wielding vanguard having a one on one battle with a heavily armored knight with shield. You take advantage of his lack of movement speed and slash at him from afar, and you will both die will just one more strike. Then you get hit with a stray arrow.....haha. Well, its frustrating at first, but the whole experience is top notch. If this studio outdoes itself with it's next title, it will be AAA....especially if Valve decides to give them a contract. (Fingers crossed)… Expand
  29. XieQn
    Apr 21, 2013
    9
    This game is very fun, very exciting multiplayer game!Very good picture quality, optimizing very good, very handful of games!
    And background set in medieval Europe, very nostalgic era game!
  30. Estus
    Apr 21, 2013
    7
    At various points the game is epic and immersive displays with war cries, taunts and the presence of mutilations and beheadings, which makes the game even more exciting. However, the combat system is difficult and often confusing, it takes a lot of determination to get to grips with the attacks and defenses of each character class by the beginner player who starts the game at an extremeAt various points the game is epic and immersive displays with war cries, taunts and the presence of mutilations and beheadings, which makes the game even more exciting. However, the combat system is difficult and often confusing, it takes a lot of determination to get to grips with the attacks and defenses of each character class by the beginner player who starts the game at an extreme disadvantage compared to veterans.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

61
#61 Best PC Game of 2012
27
#27 Most Discussed PC Game of 2012
19
#19 Most Shared PC Game of 2012

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 24 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 24
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 24
  3. Negative: 0 out of 24
  1. GameOver.gr
    Feb 26, 2013
    70
    A multiplayer experience that offers a realistic point of view of the Medieval melee battles. It's not fit for everyone, but if you get past the glitches and the high difficulty curve, you'll find an enjoyable and addictive game.
    Read full review
  2. PC Master (Greece)
    Feb 4, 2013
    80
    Chivalry is slightly… bipolar. The spectacle of a duel (especially if the two opponents are seasoned veterans) can be spectacularly breath-taking, a complex choreography that one can only marvel at. Blocks, feints, slashes, back-steps, side-hits: despite initial impressions, this can be a truly intellectual game of tactics, requiring high skills, observation and deviousness. On the other hand, the spectacle of a massive battle of fifty warriors can be ridiculously chaotic: especially if the players are inexperienced and go for blind “hack and slash” tactics, it’s more like a metal concert mosh pit than a battle for glory and honor. [February 2013]
  3. PC Gamer
    Feb 1, 2013
    81
    Chivalry is Quake to War of the Roses' Battlefield, and those seeking a faster-paced bloodier experience will undoubtedly prefer Chivalry's type of steel. [March 2013, p.65]
See all critic reviews »