Call of Duty: WWII

 PC
User Score
4.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 989 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 280 out of 989
  2. Mixed: 211 out of 989
  3. Negative: 498 out of 989
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Denis94
    Jun 22, 2021
    4
    Activision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una granActivision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una gran ambición, se salvan los gráficos y el modo zombis que es bastante interesante.… Expand
  2. r03vg
    Apr 15, 2020
    4
    Тир на рельсах с американской пропагандой. Карикатурно, шаблонно, бессмысленно.
  3. Murdockk
    Jun 27, 2023
    4
    Call of duty bir gelecek bir geçmiş yaparak aklımız ile oynuyor.xxxxxxxxxxx
  4. matdevine21
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes. My main problem with this supposed next generation    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes.
    My main problem with this supposed next generation of maps is that they are no different than last gen, where is the dynamic settings? why cant there be a physical changes to the map randomly i.e. a battle on a sinking battleship or a war around you with buildings exploding? its just lazy and derriviative but compared to what Activision charges for season pass / map packs its just insulting!

    Loot crates are obviously there, disgusting to have them opening on normandy batlefield in your "social area" and visable to all, there really isnt an "enough money earned here" is there!

    Overall I feel more down on the franchise now than ever before, it needs to go away and have a high level rethink about COD's future as come next year, COD will not be a pre order or even a day one purchase for me!    … Expand
  5. RomanG700
    Nov 15, 2017
    3
    A game with pretty decent visuals and sound. And that's all the pro's we got for 60$. Gameplay haven't changed for the past 10 years at all. It still welcomes us with 5x5 meter maps and 12 players at once. Wooden physics, crappy animation, tons of kids with cheats, lots of microtransactions - here is what you'll get, when you buy this. As for single-player - it still sucks. Dumb plot,A game with pretty decent visuals and sound. And that's all the pro's we got for 60$. Gameplay haven't changed for the past 10 years at all. It still welcomes us with 5x5 meter maps and 12 players at once. Wooden physics, crappy animation, tons of kids with cheats, lots of microtransactions - here is what you'll get, when you buy this. As for single-player - it still sucks. Dumb plot, boring characters, faceless locations - it's the top of the iceberg. Don't waste your dollars and nerves.… Expand
  6. leMMingSlayeR
    Feb 23, 2018
    3
    I'm going to focus on the multiplayer part of this game, and I can sum it up in two words. Just awful.

    From a technical standpoint this game is very poorly made. Not only are the player hitboxes worse in this game than any previous CoD I've played (just about all of them since MW), but the game itself is so buggy and hitchy my FPS go from 130 down to 40 and shoot right back up to 130.    I'm going to focus on the multiplayer part of this game, and I can sum it up in two words. Just awful.

    From a technical standpoint this game is very poorly made. Not only are the player hitboxes worse in this game than any previous CoD I've played (just about all of them since MW), but the game itself is so buggy and hitchy my FPS go from 130 down to 40 and shoot right back up to 130. I have also experienced shadow and texture pop-in, and more than one hard freeze.

    Add to this the fact that it took 3 system reboots and finally a launch in safe mode just to get the game to launch to the main menu.

    I am seriously disappointed with this game, seems like Activision doesn't really care about quality anymore so long as they can get a studio to crank out another installment every single year.

    Sledgehammer games did an amazing job on MW3, it is to this day one of my favorite in the franchise (MW2 takes the top spot) but this installment just doesn't seem to live up to the quality I hav experienced in other Sledgehammer games.

    I will say that the campaign was very good, and had what I thought was the best narrative of any CoD game in the last decade. I did play the campaign on the PS4 version however, as even with the lower fidelity and 30FPS, I had a noticeably more stable experience.

    In the end it is the technical difficulties that ruined the experience for me.

    System Specs:

    Ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
    16GB DDR4 3200
    EVGA GTX 1070 SC
    850EVO SSD
    Asus ROG Strix 144hz 1080p monitor    … Expand
  7. Kikratos
    Jan 25, 2018
    3
    Overall, I do not recommend this game. Especially if you're looking for something similar to the previous series titles in World War II.

    The campaign mode disappointed me, it has a very boring and extremely short story, very different from what I played in the past in titles for Playstation 2. 50% of the phrases spoken by the characters contain "Zussman" (name of one of the    Overall, I do not recommend this game. Especially if you're looking for something similar to the previous series titles in World War II.

    The campaign mode disappointed me, it has a very boring and extremely short story, very different from what I played in the past in titles for Playstation 2.

    50% of the phrases spoken by the characters contain "Zussman" (name of one of the characters), this really annoyed!! The whole story of the game is about this guy.

    I noticed that the developers wanted to prioritize the multiplayer mode, which, in my opinion, should not even exist. And "Zombie Mode" is very rough.

    The graphics are great. Gameplay without any innovation, is the same as the other modern CoD.

    Anyway, I played because I'm a fan of the series, but no chance to play it again. I do not recommend it!    … Expand
  8. RagingKilledMe
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    What can you expect from an AAA title featuring the second World War in 2017?
    - Realism
    - An educated view on WWII - Emotion - A fitting, well-layered story - An enthrilling, horrifying campaign that will leave you breathless and create nightmares What does CoD WWII give you? - A cinematic War - A bland view on WWII - Stereotypes and 'major' conflicts between soldiers the player    What can you expect from an AAA title featuring the second World War in 2017?
    - Realism
    - An educated view on WWII
    - Emotion
    - A fitting, well-layered story
    - An enthrilling, horrifying campaign that will leave you breathless and create nightmares

    What does CoD WWII give you?
    - A cinematic War
    - A bland view on WWII
    - Stereotypes and 'major' conflicts between soldiers the player can't care less about
    - A story that doesn't get enough build up, doesn't surprise you and is very predictable until the end
    - A 7 hour campaign that does nothing but frustrate you; there's nothing new here, you've seen this before

    CoD: WWII does well in showing off cinematics and has solid and fun gameplay, but stops right there. Because the story is so bland this game could just as well be another plastic looking game where you're fighting some made-up terrorists like in some previous CoD-titles. CoD isn't trying to make you live through WWII, but trying to rob you of not only your money but also a hope of getting closer to WWII. The producers haven't done their research, they didn't care enough about a solid campaign. But hey, there's a nazi zombie mode!    … Expand
  9. RustyCoin
    Apr 25, 2018
    3
    I am not judging this game only because it has COD brand on it, by any means no. This game is one of the worst PC games in 2017 because it's not a game-only anymore. It's half a movie right now. And this have been happening since Black Ops 1. It was not so terribly cutscenes-based "game" as it is now, but it started at that point. And what we have now? We have - 5-10 minutes of gameplay,I am not judging this game only because it has COD brand on it, by any means no. This game is one of the worst PC games in 2017 because it's not a game-only anymore. It's half a movie right now. And this have been happening since Black Ops 1. It was not so terribly cutscenes-based "game" as it is now, but it started at that point. And what we have now? We have - 5-10 minutes of gameplay, 15-20 minutes cutscenes and the circle goes on. So you get the objective, you go, do some shooting, throw grenades, boom - movie (infinte amount of cutscenes).

    And the quotes in those cutscenes...my god...they are terrible. Seriously, cutscenes like those exist only in bad war movies - "you're long way from texas boy".....

    Multiplayer is also nothing new - boring, monotonous, repetitive stuff, as every year.

    Reason why I'm giving this game 3 out of 10 is because graphics are kinda good actually (although I believe BF 1 still looks better), and visual effects. On big screen or TV effects looks really well. Other than that COD WW2 is a terrible product with boring story, stupid AI, uninteresting characters, lack of variety...the list could go on and on.    … Expand
  10. zNeverSleeping
    Jul 21, 2019
    3
    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa que me incomoda são as animações, que mais parecem de um jogo de PS2, estragando todo realismo que a engine poderia trazer - e não tras, de qualquer forma.    … Expand
  11. Morphine_Child
    Feb 1, 2020
    3
    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's sake you can't even open the doors until your stupid AI scripted friends do it for you. Apparently you are too stupid to do it.

    AI is dumb and completely scripted like everything else. Sometimes they ignore you from 2m, sometimes they have laser accuracy, effectively killing all the fun of gunplay. Shame really.

    Visually the game is ok, on par with 2017 games, but then again, there are better looking games as well. Characters look good, but they are some of the most annoying characters ever in a WWII shooter. They are just painfully stereotypical...

    At the end... I haven't finished this game and I never will. And just to show why exactly everything in this game is devoid of any shape of inspiration and originality, play the tank mission. Here it's obvious that even people that made it never even played it. If you want to finish it, you have set your controls to maximum sensitivity or else you cannot even turn your turret fast enough to aim. Completely and utterly broken mission.

    Anyway, enough about it. Save your money and buy some old WWII classics.    … Expand
  12. Pluk_Dejv
    Jul 4, 2022
    3
    the story is a total joke, full of B-movie clichés. 11 very short missions max 2 hours played with your finger in your nose, the rest are Beck's movies. The return to the health bar and first aid kits replacing the automatic healing system here works well. Call of Duty: WW2 again takes the flak and lets you shoot down not one, not two, but twenty bombers, which obediently fly into yourthe story is a total joke, full of B-movie clichés. 11 very short missions max 2 hours played with your finger in your nose, the rest are Beck's movies. The return to the health bar and first aid kits replacing the automatic healing system here works well. Call of Duty: WW2 again takes the flak and lets you shoot down not one, not two, but twenty bombers, which obediently fly into your wound. Call of Duty: WW2 drives spectacular moments in the style of Michael Bay films. The atmosphere in the ship before the actual landing in Normandy is completely boring, the same mission in Medal of Honor is full of fear, when soldiers pray or vomit, then real chaos breaks out, you won't find such an atmosphere in CoD: WW2. However, the battlegroup system attached to it seems ridiculous. Daniels can ask his teammates for help in the form of first aid kits or ammunition. However, colleague Zussman only gives you medicine if you have killed a sufficient number of enemies before. You cannot give any orders to the companions and they do not even pose any real threat to the enemies. Every now and then it happened to me that there was a German standing next to me in the trench, whom my partner reliably ignored. I literally forced myself to finish it for the price I want for it, it's really not worth it, you'd better buy Medal of Honor allied assault / Pacific Assault… Expand
  13. StarkAgentos
    Mar 28, 2022
    3
    Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.
  14. Benden
    Nov 17, 2017
    2
    The worst Call of Duty game so far, and I've played them all on my different PCs.
    Graphics are good, sound is ok but gameplay is the worst I've seen. Damn heavily scripted and bugged : on several missions you could die with no reasons. Boring : the game is not even damn fun to play and short for the single player part, really short.
    Also game mechanics are so weird : smgs and even    The worst Call of Duty game so far, and I've played them all on my different PCs.
    Graphics are good, sound is ok but gameplay is the worst I've seen. Damn heavily scripted and bugged : on several missions you could die with no reasons. Boring : the game is not even damn fun to play and short for the single player part, really short.
    Also game mechanics are so weird : smgs and even assault rifles requiring half a charger to kill a man, only headsots will save you from constant weapon reload. Scenarios dont make a sense : stukas runs in 1945 ? Weapons : PPSH that soviet smg being used by germans ? Tank battle: was a pain to play, not fun and unrealistic : Sherman should penetrate a panzer 4 from the front, even more those later sherman models (firefly in the game it seems...), same with that mission were you play a P-47 fighter plane : uncontrollable and boring.
    Crap, this sh*t just makes me want to play Medal of honor allied assault they were largely inspired by made ... 12 years ago...    … Expand
  15. Warmuro
    Apr 29, 2018
    2
    They tried to keep up with Battlefield 1, they failed miserably. We don't need another CoD for the next 20 years, i'm sure of that.
  16. Ramiro1992
    Jul 1, 2020
    2
    Crap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots ofCrap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots of potential, the characters are boring and uninteresting, and honestly, I don't care about their personalities, they act so cliche it reminds me to the awful cinematics of BF 1, a bunch of retards doing the voice acting, I WANT TO PLAY A **** GAME NOT WATCH A ****G MOVIE!
    Expect hours and hours of boring and annoying cinematics. Damn, I miss the old days with simple characters, not these stupid npcs that have the ego so high, same crap with BF 1, I DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT THE PERSONALITIES OF THE CHARACTERS!
    Overall, one of the worst COD games to date, a spit in the face for fans that loved the classic
    Soo **** boring, that level where you gotta be that retarded woman and show documents to answer stupid questions, is so damn boring it almost put me to sleep. Looks like a blatant and cheap copy of Medal of Honor, that stupid **** and the documents level are almost the same as the medal of honor games for the original Playstation. I hope they added the women to copy MOH and not a blatant and embarrasing attempt to promote feminsim via this piece of **** game. I am sad man cause this game had lots of potential but they ruined everything with bullet sponges enemies and atrocious gameplay plus stupid AI, even for free this game is a **** scam    … Expand
  17. SRKNZ
    Mar 19, 2019
    2
    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game sell. Maybe, maybe not.

    What does help is creative varied game play and an acknowledgement that the USA was not the only country to fight the Axis. This gets a quick mention at the start in truth but then its USA all the way. No option whatsoever to play another allied or axis nation which would have made the game a lot more diverse and interesting.

    Whats also flawed in this game is like so many others its reliance on "push button" cut scenes where you try to destroy your keyboard attempting to do something pointless like a early on and quite frankly God awful tussle with a German soldier armed with a bayonet. This could and in my opinion should have been left out. It added nothing and the clumsy approach taken to key/mouse combinations was a usability nightmare.

    In short, in my opinion, this is mediocre fare that's repetitive and feels awkward due to the weird mouse key combo's used in the annoying, on best left in the recycle bin ", interactive" cut scenes. 2/10 from me.    … Expand
  18. LifeHistory
    Nov 15, 2017
    2
    What a bad way to throw heck of a comeback...I always dreamed of playing WW2 in such graphics and been waiting for Activiton to go back to the old classics but they failed badly. I never play and care about multiplayer. I mostly play COD games for the SP.

    I am going to make this as short as the game itself! PROS. -Great graphics. -Fantastic atmosphere it like being in the    What a bad way to throw heck of a comeback...I always dreamed of playing WW2 in such graphics and been waiting for Activiton to go back to the old classics but they failed badly. I never play and care about multiplayer. I mostly play COD games for the SP.

    I am going to make this as short as the game itself!
    PROS.
    -Great graphics.
    -Fantastic atmosphere it like being in the battlefield it's alive.
    -Medical kits.
    -Voice acting.
    -PC Optimized.
    CONS.
    -The Singelplayer is like 4h max.
    -It mostly car chase and holding possession and shooting. (Like a mobile game)
    -Too much of a cinematic play.
    -Only 6 chapters that feels rushed and very short.
    -Nothing special about the story.

    I still think infinite Warfare the worst COD still and this takes the second place. If only it was longer and had gameplay like the old ones this would been amazing. Activiton should find itself another series or just quit gaming! Its embarrassing really.    … Expand
  19. Filaton
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    A twitch shooter with lootboxes, dlc and an alternate history WW2 theme. I mean, who wouldn't want to play as a black woman in service of the Wehrmacht.
  20. nikt45
    Nov 20, 2017
    2
    Very low game quality ( overall ) and old engine, stupid campaign no war climate, dramatically low quality Polish dubbing. I back to BF1 and write this line only because need 150 character to put this message.
  21. lakings78
    Nov 12, 2017
    2
    First Call of Duty I've purchased new off the shelf in over 5 years. Nothing has changed. Still no dedicated servers, hit detection is horrible. The game rewards camping and mindless running around---there's no real tactics to be had. As of today, full game features are still unavailable and connectivity issues and lag are still plaguing the game. The game has a decent campaign, butFirst Call of Duty I've purchased new off the shelf in over 5 years. Nothing has changed. Still no dedicated servers, hit detection is horrible. The game rewards camping and mindless running around---there's no real tactics to be had. As of today, full game features are still unavailable and connectivity issues and lag are still plaguing the game. The game has a decent campaign, but that's where it stops at delivering anything good. The multiplayer is just horribly frustrating. Average scores for players are in the negative. The hit detection is what bothers me the most. Nothing like unloading half a magazine into an opposing player only for them to shoot you and kill you like you were shooting blanks. The kill cam shows most your hits that you thought were hitting...weren't there...which tells you exactly that the netcode is not up to par. Just another re-skinned COD game, save your money. Better yet, if you must have it, get it on the secondary market to put a ding in Activision/Sledgehammer's profit margins. I only wish I could get a refund, as I stupidly purchased the digital download collector's edition. Waste of $100 that evidently can't be refunded. At least Gamestop would give me about 50% of the game's value back. I just love how the official reviews are still beaming, except that now it's down to 75 on metacritic. Heed my warning...save your money, Activision and Sledgehammer games have failed the casual gamer. I'm sure the MLG, Monster Chugging Fan Boys will still love this game because it's the same twitchy trash that;s been re-skinned every year. I actually am hoping for a bust on this one so severe that there are layoffs for the developers that worked on it. They clearly do not know what they are doing.… Expand
  22. jcdentonunatco
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Pretty well optimized, decent graphics. At first it seemed they overhauled the audio, and added realistic sfx finally. But then after I took my first shot, I realized nope it was still the same crappy gun sounds. I don't know why its so hard for a AAA studio to add good gun sounds.

    The gameplay feels basically identity to every other COD game, including the old original WW2 ones. And    Pretty well optimized, decent graphics. At first it seemed they overhauled the audio, and added realistic sfx finally. But then after I took my first shot, I realized nope it was still the same crappy gun sounds. I don't know why its so hard for a AAA studio to add good gun sounds.

    The gameplay feels basically identity to every other COD game, including the old original WW2 ones. And that is a major problem. The originals were good....for their time. But its 2017 and games have evolved since then, but not COD. The physics engine is poor, the ragdoll effects are nonexistent. The death animations feel the same as all the other COD games, and it completely kills the game. When you blow up a group of enemies they just slouch over and die in their scripted death animations, instead of going flying or ragdolling. The gunplay is too fast and feels like the character has no "weight" to him. Other than a few scenes, it doesnt feel like you are really in WW2, because so many scenes are just completely unrealistic. Like using sniper rifle to shoot 60 enemies in 5 minutes. Or using a flak gun to shoot down 10 planes in under a minute. Or the endless waves of germans running at you with no intelligence. The explosions are very pixelated.

    The voice acting is okay, but some of the lines are cheesy or out of place for the scene. For the amount of money they spent on this game, there really is no excuse for how generic it is. The engine feels massively outdated and arcadey.    … Expand
  23. DioXGaming
    Nov 19, 2017
    2
    Not based on WWII but just another franchise on call of duty. Why won't this die already? Like there are different types of call of duty summary stories out there and they can't just let this die and start a new original game but no they have to create from scratch not based on story line. Only the fans rate this 10 because they're call of duty fans and that's their childhood.
  24. 5thy
    Mar 20, 2018
    2
    This is the only COD game that I didn't replay (except for Infinite Warfare and Black ops 3 which I refused to play). The reason was that the game was absolutely boring. I haven't tried the multiplayer yet, but the SP was awful. I felt like I was watching a mediocre military film about WW2, based on true events.
    Aiming through a scope was a real pain in the ass. Also experiences a number    This is the only COD game that I didn't replay (except for Infinite Warfare and Black ops 3 which I refused to play). The reason was that the game was absolutely boring. I haven't tried the multiplayer yet, but the SP was awful. I felt like I was watching a mediocre military film about WW2, based on true events.
    Aiming through a scope was a real pain in the ass. Also experiences a number of glitches and fps drop.
    Also what on earth were russian PPSH machine guns doing on Omaha???
    I really hope if there' s another COD about WWII, it'll look more like World at war.    … Expand
  25. Fl0wAnima
    Jul 20, 2018
    2
    For 1.2 hours, I already say that this: FULL HUGE
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare: It was also done by Sledgehammer Games like WW2
    But some dick game is optically worse than the game of 2014 Multiplayer is more or less normal, but if optimization was normal .... The mechanics of shooting are not bad, the sounds are about nothing. Separately, about the game menu, the cartoon: Who did    For 1.2 hours, I already say that this: FULL HUGE
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare: It was also done by Sledgehammer Games like WW2
    But some dick game is optically worse than the game of 2014
    Multiplayer is more or less normal, but if optimization was normal ....
    The mechanics of shooting are not bad, the sounds are about nothing.
    Separately, about the game menu, the cartoon: Who did this menu, I do not need your help, I can do it myself, I'm so confused that I do not understand where the game starts to look, I waited 20 minutes for the game to connect to the game ...
    This is some kind of not respect for the players from the Sledgehammer games
    Sorry for my bad Eng language , i'm 14 years old Russian kid.    … Expand
  26. teamfranken91
    Dec 20, 2019
    2
    I created an account to review this game. It's fine (by which I mean bland and uninspired, but I mean it's a CoD SP campaign, so you know), but about two hours in I hit a tank level. The controls were *awful.* You can't really move the turret, except very slowly, and if you recenter your mouse, it stops swinging. You also can't really tell which direction your tank is facing, so you'llI created an account to review this game. It's fine (by which I mean bland and uninspired, but I mean it's a CoD SP campaign, so you know), but about two hours in I hit a tank level. The controls were *awful.* You can't really move the turret, except very slowly, and if you recenter your mouse, it stops swinging. You also can't really tell which direction your tank is facing, so you'll press W to advance and go sailing off to the right.

    This is aggravated by the fact that you're in a compact, urban setting, so you can expect to spend a lot of time getting stuck in corners and ramming into walls. Unfortunately, the point of the tank level is to destroy enemy tanks, which you can *only* do by flanking them, so in the unlikely event that you actually stumble upon an enemy tank's flank, good luck moving your turret into position before the tank turns to face you.

    I'm astounded that it got released in this state. Fortunately it only took me 2.5 hours to get there, so I was able to refund it.    … Expand
  27. Psy_pmP
    Sep 4, 2018
    1
    I do not know how about the whole game, but in the single player everything becomes clear from the very beginning. In the first level, you are shown how the developers **** on the players. Run from the fence to the fence, die Hundred times and it's unclear what to do. At this point, I deleted the game. The good did not buy this ****
  28. BRubble
    Nov 11, 2017
    1
    Well this is pretty standard practice for a CoD game.... devs and publisher lie through their teeth with the standard generic hyped grocery list of "features" and don't bother to follow through, they know the kids will buy it regardless. The devs could've added a "Liberate Bert and Ernie on Sesame Street" level and the gamers would believe it to be historically accurate, heck it would beWell this is pretty standard practice for a CoD game.... devs and publisher lie through their teeth with the standard generic hyped grocery list of "features" and don't bother to follow through, they know the kids will buy it regardless. The devs could've added a "Liberate Bert and Ernie on Sesame Street" level and the gamers would believe it to be historically accurate, heck it would be as believable as the rest of this mess. An utter disgrace to those who served.
    Yes CoD is "going back to its roots" indeed....cut, paste, rinse, repeat and caaaaash in. The saddest aspect isnt the less than mediocre game itself, it's that the same people who feel betrayed by this abysmal trash will still get in line next year for the next enchanting installment with cash in hand.
    Weak.    … Expand
  29. silas1980
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    Well done Activision, after two years of successfully avoiding your yearly copy and paste but somehow simultaneously getting worse and worse I relented and bought this - mainly due to my affection of World at War. Well, it turns out that eight-year-old game is better in every single way. Congrats on the hype train, I bought a ticket - and now, after one day, I'm getting off. Abysmal.
  30. secretsw
    Jan 8, 2018
    1
    - Zero variability
    + You can minimize the game and watch memes during cutscenes.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

21
#21 Most Discussed PC Game of 2017
20
#20 Most Shared PC Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 21
  3. Negative: 1 out of 21
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Jan 6, 2018
    50
    Familiarity breeds contempt. [Issue#269, p.49]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 2, 2018
    80
    The new Call of Duty is like a shopping list, in which the devs list one second-rate cliché after another. It's not always for the sake of it, but it's already making the WWII unique that everybody should play. [Issue#280]
  3. Games.cz
    Jan 2, 2018
    70
    A magnificent, but also a sympathetic, unpretentious return to the roots of the series. Yet the campaign is short-lived, and your next experience depends on how much you enjoy the multiplayer and/or shooting Nazi zombies.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »