Call of Duty: WWII

 PC
User Score
4.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 989 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 280 out of 989
  2. Mixed: 211 out of 989
  3. Negative: 498 out of 989
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Richard_dias
    Aug 14, 2023
    8
    Yeah, that was not bad at all. I really like the campaign, zombies is OK, and the multiplayer... well, when I got to test it it was dead already, so I'm not evaluating it. Anyway, I think that's one of the best WW2 campaigns you can have in a "modern" game.
  2. Murdockk
    Jun 27, 2023
    4
    Call of duty bir gelecek bir geçmiş yaparak aklımız ile oynuyor.xxxxxxxxxxx
  3. Matheus7894
    Jun 23, 2023
    8
    Bom jogo, estou começando a jogar todos os cod pela linha do tempo do game, e esse foi o primeiro que jogo, o jogo é gostoso de jogar um pouco curto e ele se passa na 2 guerra mundial as cutscene do jogo são boas da uma imersão bem legal, joguei no pc e nao tive problemas de lag, tive 1 bug que uma fase de sniper o mapa não carregou e tive que fechar e abrir o jogo mas depois disso voltouBom jogo, estou começando a jogar todos os cod pela linha do tempo do game, e esse foi o primeiro que jogo, o jogo é gostoso de jogar um pouco curto e ele se passa na 2 guerra mundial as cutscene do jogo são boas da uma imersão bem legal, joguei no pc e nao tive problemas de lag, tive 1 bug que uma fase de sniper o mapa não carregou e tive que fechar e abrir o jogo mas depois disso voltou ao normal, o jogo é bom mas não é perfeito 8/10… Expand
  4. Mattie
    May 23, 2023
    8
    Gameplay - 6/10
    Graphics - 8/10
    Performance - 8/10
    Story - 10/10

    Total score - 8/10
  5. asdgasgea
    May 12, 2023
    8
    ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
  6. DivineFaith
    Apr 16, 2023
    10
    The campaign is simply a masterpiece!
    She is a travelling companion and very enlightening.
    Thus, everyone can really experience what it means to have been in the war and what sacrifices and pain it caused.
  7. realWhiteMan
    Apr 9, 2023
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. My rating is based on my impressions of the game. This is not an objective review. I play quite a big number of titles per year and decided to review them as a peace of art and not as a product.… Expand
  8. threeoftendie
    Feb 5, 2023
    6
    Это одна из игр моего детства. И, несмотря на возраст и недостатки, о которых я сейчас узнаю от других, она не кажется мне плохой
  9. IniciusV
    Feb 4, 2023
    0
    FPS É UMA MERDA, SHOOTER É UMA MERDA, PRIMEIRA PESSOA É UMA MERDA, SÓ TEM FPS/SHOOTER/PRIMEIRA PESSOA NESSA MERDA
  10. hileger
    Jan 14, 2023
    5
    ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////,mmm,mm,m,m,Говно
  11. bar0yka
    Jan 8, 2023
    8
    grafikler harika bölümler de akılda kalıcıydı neden düşük vermişer anlayamadım eski codlara benzemişti oyun uzun süre sonra
  12. Joe2539
    Jan 6, 2023
    10
    Very Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good
  13. Kalev158
    Sep 4, 2022
    10
    This is my first and favorite COD! It‘s so much fun to play in the WWII! So, i can‘t hate this game
  14. 1ndastreal
    Jul 30, 2022
    8
    done Activision, after two years of successfully avoiding your yearly copy and paste but somehow simultaneously getting worse and worse I relented and bought this - mainly due to my affection of World at War. Well, it turns out that eight-year-old game is better in every single way. Congrats on the hype train, I bought a done Activision, after two years of successfully avoiding your yearlydone Activision, after two years of successfully avoiding your yearly copy and paste but somehow simultaneously getting worse and worse I relented and bought this - mainly due to my affection of World at War. Well, it turns out that eight-year-old game is better in every single way. Congrats on the hype train, I bought a done Activision, after two years of successfully avoiding your yearly copy and paste but somehow simultaneously getting worse and worse I relented and bought this - mainly due to my affection of World at War. Well, it turns out that eight-year-old game is better in every single way. Congrats on the hype train, I bought a… Expand
  15. UI-4054
    Jul 15, 2022
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Now the games about the Second World War all look canon, so the emphasis is on the features scenarious and the possibilities of the game, which makes this game the loser of COD2 2005… Expand
  16. Pluk_Dejv
    Jul 4, 2022
    3
    the story is a total joke, full of B-movie clichés. 11 very short missions max 2 hours played with your finger in your nose, the rest are Beck's movies. The return to the health bar and first aid kits replacing the automatic healing system here works well. Call of Duty: WW2 again takes the flak and lets you shoot down not one, not two, but twenty bombers, which obediently fly into yourthe story is a total joke, full of B-movie clichés. 11 very short missions max 2 hours played with your finger in your nose, the rest are Beck's movies. The return to the health bar and first aid kits replacing the automatic healing system here works well. Call of Duty: WW2 again takes the flak and lets you shoot down not one, not two, but twenty bombers, which obediently fly into your wound. Call of Duty: WW2 drives spectacular moments in the style of Michael Bay films. The atmosphere in the ship before the actual landing in Normandy is completely boring, the same mission in Medal of Honor is full of fear, when soldiers pray or vomit, then real chaos breaks out, you won't find such an atmosphere in CoD: WW2. However, the battlegroup system attached to it seems ridiculous. Daniels can ask his teammates for help in the form of first aid kits or ammunition. However, colleague Zussman only gives you medicine if you have killed a sufficient number of enemies before. You cannot give any orders to the companions and they do not even pose any real threat to the enemies. Every now and then it happened to me that there was a German standing next to me in the trench, whom my partner reliably ignored. I literally forced myself to finish it for the price I want for it, it's really not worth it, you'd better buy Medal of Honor allied assault / Pacific Assault… Expand
  17. ThreeOfDiamonds
    May 7, 2022
    8
    Call Of Duty: WWII Is Good, But not That Good. It's Great

    Call Of Duty Got World War 2 Back, And It's Real Good, The Story Is Amazing But It's Too "American" There Are Interactions Like Squad Abilities: Sgt. Pierson Can Highlight Enemies. Stiles Can Give Grenades. Zussman Can Give Medkits. Aiello Can Give Flares. And Turner Gives You Ammo. Call Of Duty: WWII Brought Back The Medkit    Call Of Duty: WWII Is Good, But not That Good. It's Great

    Call Of Duty Got World War 2 Back, And It's Real Good, The Story Is Amazing But It's Too "American" There Are Interactions Like Squad Abilities: Sgt. Pierson Can Highlight Enemies. Stiles Can Give Grenades. Zussman Can Give Medkits. Aiello Can Give Flares. And Turner Gives You Ammo. Call Of Duty: WWII Brought Back The Medkit Feature Where You Have To Use Medkits To Regain Health, But Instead Of Running Around For Health Like In The First COD, You Have To Get It From Zussman And use The '6' Key To Regain Health. The Multiplayer Isn't Really Good And Zombies, Everything Just Makes Sense, Except A British Woman Doing Nothing, Rosseau Is Also A Woman But Is Playable And A French Resistance Fighter So it Makes Sens I Guess?

    Recommend it 8/10    … Expand
  18. Xeculiar
    Mar 28, 2022
    0
    how do people find this trash game good. sh*t campaign with boring characters bad multiplayer with pay 2 win weapon variants and a god awful zombies what's the point of playing this game when I could literally play ghosts and have a funner experience. the game is so bad it gave me aids
  19. StarkAgentos
    Mar 28, 2022
    3
    Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.
  20. elolugo
    Mar 12, 2022
    6
    Played only the campaing. Great throwback to old school COD. The story had so much potential at the beginning but at the end the characters are not likeable at all
  21. johnnyleon
    Feb 27, 2022
    10
    Way more modes including the genius war mode. Way more content, weapons. Real teams (armys) in multiplayer mode instead of operators who are all beating nazis in the victory sequences which makes zero sense. Better feel. less glitches.

    Buy Call of Duty: WW2 and the season pass and support this far superior game to CoD Vanguard! You can also play this game on PS5 and Xbox Series X    Way more modes including the genius war mode. Way more content, weapons. Real teams (armys) in multiplayer mode instead of operators who are all beating nazis in the victory sequences which makes zero sense. Better feel. less glitches.

    Buy Call of Duty: WW2 and the season pass and support this far superior game to CoD Vanguard!

    You can also play this game on PS5 and Xbox Series X through backward compatibility or buy it in their digital stores. You can also get it for a few dollars as a used physical copy. Please also buy the season pass in the digital store to support this great game.    … Expand
  22. Arman12345
    Feb 16, 2022
    10
    Ира супер, сюжет огонь, графика на уровне.
  23. vova22379
    Jan 14, 2022
    6
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
  24. antonzhalob
    Nov 21, 2021
    5
    Как и всегда - посредственная часть call of duty!
  25. Woolee
    Oct 4, 2021
    8
    Well done Activision, after two years of successfully avoiding your yearly copy and paste but somehow simultaneously getting worse and worse I relented
  26. rezo_21
    Sep 18, 2021
    6
    ====================IIIIIIIIII GAME SCORE : 57 IIIIIIIIII====================NP
  27. Tomle1202
    Jul 12, 2021
    6
    It's funny that Call of Duty thinks retreading old ground but making it worse is how innovation works.
  28. KepasaAmigo
    Jul 10, 2021
    7
    Great Single Player experience. Mp was just every cod but with ww2 weapons. over all 7/10
  29. Dimulio
    Jul 5, 2021
    0
    Редкостное гуано. Любимый сеттинг умудрились так изговнять, что игра превращается в невыносимую пытку. Надеюсь, в аду найдется особое место для рукожопых и бездарных разработчиков, ответственных за этот высер. Стыд и позор!Редкостное гуано. Любимый сеттинг умудрились так изговнять, что игра превращается в невыносимую пытку. Надеюсь, в аду найдется особое место для рукожопых и бездарных разработчиков, ответственных за этот высер. Стыд и позор!
  30. Denis94
    Jun 22, 2021
    4
    Activision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una granActivision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una gran ambición, se salvan los gráficos y el modo zombis que es bastante interesante.… Expand
  31. badyagiz
    Jun 20, 2021
    10
    I played the campaign mode and I like it very much. Classic Call of Duty gameplay but its good executed.
  32. Ivo_Bustamante
    Jun 9, 2021
    9
    Personalmente, el juego de call of duty que más me ha gustado su campaña es una maravilla
  33. yeezymane
    Apr 1, 2021
    5
    Графика - 7/10
    Игровой процесс - 5/10
    Сюжет - 4/10
    Музыка - 4/10
  34. Milansan777
    Mar 29, 2021
    1
    The graphics is the only thing this game has going for it. Was hoping for a trip back to "World at War", such a classic...but sadly not the case...not by a long shot!
  35. gamezn_ru
    Feb 28, 2021
    7
    Мы все знаем, чего ожидать от игры Call of Duty: WWII. Всегда есть кампания, всегда мультиплеер и всегда кооператив PvE. Однако за последнее десятилетие мы, похоже, забыли, насколько хороша эта упаковка, когда все части встают на свои места. Введите Call of Duty: WWII, Sledgehammer Games magnum opus и доказательство того, что в серии все еще есть что-то, что может дать помимоМы все знаем, чего ожидать от игры Call of Duty: WWII. Всегда есть кампания, всегда мультиплеер и всегда кооператив PvE. Однако за последнее десятилетие мы, похоже, забыли, насколько хороша эта упаковка, когда все части встают на свои места. Введите Call of Duty: WWII, Sledgehammer Games magnum opus и доказательство того, что в серии все еще есть что-то, что может дать помимо ностальгического путешествия назад к самому кровавому конфликту в истории человечества.

    Кампания представляет собой сборник величайших хитов наступления союзников на Берлин: штурмовать пляжи Нормандии, освободить Париж, отморозить задницу в Арденнах и пересечь Рейн. Call of Duty: WWII отказывается валить на вас известные лица в попытке заставить вас заботиться о своей кампании, вместо этого он поворачивает циферблат назад с 11, предлагая игрокам ограниченный взгляд на войну.

    Вы проводите большую часть истории, сражаясь бок о бок с теми же пятью мужчинами: сержантом и лейтенантом, которые постоянно сцепляются рогами, лучшим другом Зусманом, язвительным всезнайкой Стайлзом и деревенским деревенщиной Айелло. Каждый из них предлагает различные услуги, будь то первая помощь, пополнение запасов боеприпасов или обнаружение врагов, поэтому вы должны держать их рядом, что помогает создать органическую связь между вами и вашими товарищами.

    Самые смелые изменения были сохранены для мультиплеера. Каким бы глупым ни был маркетинговый лозунг, «сапоги на земле» прекрасно подводит итог тому, что такое Call of Duty: WWII, не в последнюю очередь потому, что в этом году нет реактивных ранцев. Такие дополнения, как Штаб-квартира и Война, заимствуются у других титанов жанра, первый добавляет социальное пространство, чтобы вы могли передохнуть между раундами, в то время как второй делает все возможное, чтобы подражать популярному режиму Rush Battlefield.

    Война, без сомнения, является изюминкой. Впервые в игре с ТРЕСКОЙ команды действительно играют в цель, бросаясь в обреченные, отчаянные атаки, не задумываясь о своем соотношении К/Д. Продвигаясь вверх по пляжам Нормандии, отчаянно хлопая дымовыми гранатами, чтобы прикрыть вас, когда вы мчитесь между противотанковыми укреплениями, безошибочное жужжание огня MG42 доминирует над звуковым ландшафтом — Война приносит прикосновение поля боя к Call of Duty: WWII, ощущение масштаба и зрелища, которое всегда отсутствовало в мультиплеере серии.

    И это тоже улучшается. Activision и Sledgehammer Games уже проделали замечательную работу по обновлению игры новым оружием, игровыми режимами и сезонными картами… без каких-либо дополнительных затрат для вас. Если плохие продажи Infinite Warfare поставили под сомнение будущее серии, то Call of Duty: WWII — идеальный ответ. Он служит напоминанием не только о том, каким был Call of Duty, но и о том, каким он может быть.    … Expand
  36. emreglbdk
    Jan 31, 2021
    6
    A nice COD game with good graphics. I empathize because I love WW2 games. It could be fine though.
  37. Crimert
    Jan 16, 2021
    7
    I really spent a good time and enjoyed the game. But the gameplay could be deeper and the campaign time could be longer. 9hrs on record.
  38. barinuz
    Jan 7, 2021
    0
    This game is in my favourite 5 games of cod series list, it was a very good and enjoyable game for me.
    Stealth parts are very good and graphics are really awesome. Other remaining missions were also good, this game must be played.
  39. Morgot9
    Dec 28, 2020
    0
    Este juego peco en su momento de la falta de contenido durante 5 meses, si lo juegas actualmente es un juego con rachas cíclicas, una jugabilidad que te atrapa, un sonido excelente, la campaña es una buena manera de entretenerte y los zombies son de los mejores. Creo que lo que le molesto a la gente fue el SBMM (Skill base MatchMaking) o (Emparejamiento por habilidad) que luego con laEste juego peco en su momento de la falta de contenido durante 5 meses, si lo juegas actualmente es un juego con rachas cíclicas, una jugabilidad que te atrapa, un sonido excelente, la campaña es una buena manera de entretenerte y los zombies son de los mejores. Creo que lo que le molesto a la gente fue el SBMM (Skill base MatchMaking) o (Emparejamiento por habilidad) que luego con la llegada del competitivo desapareció pero el error no se pudo corregir y se quedo ahí.… Expand
  40. Sjw-remover
    Dec 19, 2020
    0
    Worst world war 2 game ever. Campaign only features american side. Characters are forgettable. Doesnt have good soundtrack. Multiplayer is boring and infested with lootboxes.
    Players demanded WW2 game after getting tired of garbage futuristic games. This could have been good and refreshing WW2 game if it was done right. At least they tried.
    Advanced Warfare 2 would have been better than this.
  41. D_e_l_u_x
    Nov 21, 2020
    0
    ...................The lack of historical accuracy is offensive to history!
  42. kuhggr
    Nov 20, 2020
    1
    America best Axis and Soviet bad. There is no Eastern front and Pacific War. Tank and plane mechanics are too bad. HP system is like Call of Duty 1. But face textures are good.(Sorry for A2 English)
  43. ErayTellezi
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Atmosfer ve oynanış olarak öncesindeki bazı dandik cod oyunlarından sonra ilaç gibi gelmişti.
  44. LyhaMaksim
    Nov 1, 2020
    7
    Игра заслуживает внимания!

    У игры есть тонны минусов которые порой напрочь отбивают желание и вызывают отвращение играть в эту игру. Я сейчас говорю об атмосфере, об погружении в историю того времени. Разработчики исходя из толерантности сделали парадоксальные вещи, они хотели сделать настолько красочные завораживающие бои (как оно и есть на самом деле!), знаете, прям чувствуется    Игра заслуживает внимания!

    У игры есть тонны минусов которые порой напрочь отбивают желание и вызывают отвращение играть в эту игру.
    Я сейчас говорю об атмосфере, об погружении в историю того времени. Разработчики исходя из толерантности сделали парадоксальные вещи, они хотели сделать настолько красочные завораживающие бои (как оно и есть на самом деле!), знаете, прям чувствуется атмосфера войны, но они так исковеркали исторические черты того времени что аж тошно смотреть, от железного креста в место свастики до темнокожих за Третий рейх (радует что африканцы только в мультиплеере).Звуки делали будто вообще другие люди, ну как можно на столько офигенно сделать звук взрыва, и одновременно так ужасно звуки стрельбы, вообще не чувствуешь что у тебе оружие настоящее! Русская озвучка в игре на столько убога что я просто не могу это слушать, а включить русские субтитры с английской озвучкой просто нельзя, в игре нет такой функции, ты либо играешь полностью на русском, либо полностью на английском(
    Но если не придираться к мелочам, то сюжет у игры очень интересный, раскрываются главные герои, хотя хотелось бы больше драмы.

    Спасибо за прочтение моего обзора! Буду рад если вы оцените его)
    Играйте только в хорошие игры!    … Expand
  45. dislexicpotato
    Oct 24, 2020
    7
    After going in with low expectations I was surprised to find that Call of Duty WWII is actually a decent game. The single player campaign is solid, with some missions being excellent and others being quite forgettable. This is one of the few Call of Duty games where I found myself actually getting immersed in the setting, which is largely due to the game's excellent visuals and characterAfter going in with low expectations I was surprised to find that Call of Duty WWII is actually a decent game. The single player campaign is solid, with some missions being excellent and others being quite forgettable. This is one of the few Call of Duty games where I found myself actually getting immersed in the setting, which is largely due to the game's excellent visuals and character animations. The multiplayer is very 'standard', even for a Call of Duty game, with a hub world that is pointless and microtransactions/lootboxes that are shoved in your face. Nothing about the multiplayer is 'new' which makes it feel a little underwhelming and boring. The zombies mode is decent but definitely not the best in the series by any means. Overall, I feel that this game is well put together but it definitely comes across as unoriginal and generic, however I still feel its worth experiencing for anyone that likes WWII settings and if you are a big fan of the franchise then you will likely enjoy what the game has to offer.… Expand
  46. SefanMucha
    Sep 12, 2020
    0
    The person who designed tank controlls should get fired, the person who accepted them should never again get a job in gaming industry, the person who tested them and still accepted it should never get a job anywhere- should be homeless and die of starvation. That controls are the most incompetent thing I have ever seen and believe me I have seen a lot. Those controlls alone made meThe person who designed tank controlls should get fired, the person who accepted them should never again get a job in gaming industry, the person who tested them and still accepted it should never get a job anywhere- should be homeless and die of starvation. That controls are the most incompetent thing I have ever seen and believe me I have seen a lot. Those controlls alone made me uninstall the whole game and stop playing it.… Expand
  47. Lone_Wolf_Sones
    Jul 1, 2020
    6
    For a franchise that spans numerous entries Call of Duty has found itself with a legacy which creates a double edged sword. You had games that tried to shake up the formula to varying degrees of success like Black Ops and perhaps most notably Modern Warfare. Perhaps it's equal parts testament to it's success and condemnation that the series can fall into a rut. Call of Duty: WWII is anFor a franchise that spans numerous entries Call of Duty has found itself with a legacy which creates a double edged sword. You had games that tried to shake up the formula to varying degrees of success like Black Ops and perhaps most notably Modern Warfare. Perhaps it's equal parts testament to it's success and condemnation that the series can fall into a rut. Call of Duty: WWII is an example of the latter. The touted return to "Boots on the Ground" brings with it a return to the WWII which is my favorite period/conflict. Credit where credit is due? The game does look amazing.

    However in plumbing the depths of this well trod conflict? It feels like Sledgehammer games is marking off a list of check boxes. D-Day? Check. Big ridiculous set pieces? Check. Perhaps that's the biggest problem I had with the game. The bombast and set pieces found in other Call of Duty games don't quite mesh well here. You see a church steeple fall, a train derail, and even have a ridiculous jeep chase sequence.

    To go back to the example of D-day? We once again storm Normandy beach. And while I do commend them for depicting it in horrifying detail? I do feel that the beach is made to feel very narrow rather than the vast stretch of beach it truly was. It feels really constrained. More constrained is the fact that this D-day sequence focuses solely on the beach landings. You see no airborne invasion preceding the invasion. Nor do you see the other allied landings on the other beaches. I feel D-Day has never truly been done justice in a video game because it offers such a limited view of the larger scale of the invasion.

    You do team up with SOE later in the game, but it feels a bit like an afterthought.

    Some of the other issues I had were the excessive quicktime events. They really take you of the game and worse? It felt like many of them were ripped or aped from films like Saving Private Ryan. Knife sequence? Check. Pistol and Tank sequence? Check.

    The other misstep has to do with the characters. I sadly never became truly invested in the characters like I should have. Some of the best war films get you invested in the characters by showing them in their life before they go to war. In Band of Brothers? You spend the duration of basic training with Easy Company getting to know the men. In COD: WWII? Your dropped right in with no attachment to these characters. It's jarring and disorienting. Zussman you kind of get a bit of emotion for. But he was about the only one. Sgt. Pierson is an unlikable jerk. Even as a Sergeant goes you get the impression that he has a blatant disregard for the lives of his men. I understand what they were trying to do with him but I don't know if it was executed all that well.

    Then we have the multiplayer. I still find it incredibly distasteful and tacky that they have lootboxes and any form of monetization on "Normandy Beach." It feels sleazy in any other game but it feels particularly dirty and disrespectful here. Even if it is a virtual representation of the beach. This is made even worse when these are opened in front of other players. It's disgusting.

    And then we have the ludicrous situation where you have black females for the "Wehrmacht." It comes across as incredibly tone deaf. Does Activision not realize that the German military were fighting for a dictator who was promoting ideas that are rearing their head even today? If they really wanted the diversity in the multiplayer portion of the game? They could have modeled a black man based on the tuskeegee airmen or the all black tank destroyer batallion known as the black panthers. And as far as women go? They could have british SOE, or russian female snipers. Fortunately they didn't go to the extent Battlefield V did in their single player campaign.

    I picked this game up cheap during a steam sale. Thank god. If you are looking for an authentic WWII shooter? There are other games that are better offerings. Red Orchestra 2, Rising Storm, Hell Let Loose, Battalion 1944 all are recommendations I would give.    … Expand
  48. Ramiro1992
    Jul 1, 2020
    2
    Crap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots ofCrap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots of potential, the characters are boring and uninteresting, and honestly, I don't care about their personalities, they act so cliche it reminds me to the awful cinematics of BF 1, a bunch of retards doing the voice acting, I WANT TO PLAY A **** GAME NOT WATCH A ****G MOVIE!
    Expect hours and hours of boring and annoying cinematics. Damn, I miss the old days with simple characters, not these stupid npcs that have the ego so high, same crap with BF 1, I DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT THE PERSONALITIES OF THE CHARACTERS!
    Overall, one of the worst COD games to date, a spit in the face for fans that loved the classic
    Soo **** boring, that level where you gotta be that retarded woman and show documents to answer stupid questions, is so damn boring it almost put me to sleep. Looks like a blatant and cheap copy of Medal of Honor, that stupid **** and the documents level are almost the same as the medal of honor games for the original Playstation. I hope they added the women to copy MOH and not a blatant and embarrasing attempt to promote feminsim via this piece of **** game. I am sad man cause this game had lots of potential but they ruined everything with bullet sponges enemies and atrocious gameplay plus stupid AI, even for free this game is a **** scam    … Expand
  49. PrdPak
    Jun 5, 2020
    7
    *This review just concerns the campaign.*

    The campaign's story is mediocre from beginning to the end, whereas the ending was very good. The gameplay is really good, the squad abilities are really helpful. The slowdown in snipers is very useful, and the audio feedback of headshots is amazing. The gunplay is fantastic, the guns sound heavy and accurate.

    Overall a 7/10 game.
  50. PedroNowicki
    Jun 1, 2020
    7
    Call of Duty: WWII to moim osobistym zdaniem to bardzo dobry powrót do czasów kiedy CoDy były o Drugiej WŚ. Niepotrzebne były tylko te skrypty i średni wręcz kiepski polski dubbing. Multi jak zawsze dobry tak samo jak tryb zombie.
  51. Muismi
    Apr 28, 2020
    1
    Call of Duty: WWII es el supuesto regreso a los origenes de la saga, pero tras haber jugado a todos los COD hasta Black Ops 2 puedo decir que de vuelta a los origenes tiene más bien poco. Es un intento fallido de dar frescura a una saga que está más que aborrecida por el público. Tiene bugs, incoherencia en la trama, fallos históricos y simplemente es lo mismo una y otra vez con call ofCall of Duty: WWII es el supuesto regreso a los origenes de la saga, pero tras haber jugado a todos los COD hasta Black Ops 2 puedo decir que de vuelta a los origenes tiene más bien poco. Es un intento fallido de dar frescura a una saga que está más que aborrecida por el público. Tiene bugs, incoherencia en la trama, fallos históricos y simplemente es lo mismo una y otra vez con call of duty. Toda esta situación está agravada por el hecho de las cajas Loot del juego, que directamente incitan al juego, a la adicción a las cajas y al juego de azar. Por no decir que Battlefield 1, el principal competidor con este juego, es mejor en absolutamente todos los aspectos, gráficos, sonido, apartado online, optimización, campaña, y los demás apartados. Una pena que no sea una vuelta a los origenes de verdad, Call of Duty 2 por ejemplo hubiera sido un buen punto de referencia para desarrollar este juego. No recomiendo a la gente malgastar su dinero en este juego, hay un mercado lleno de juegos mejores que este.… Expand
  52. bariserkul
    Apr 27, 2020
    8
    It is a nice game because,real Call Of Duty It.(i think) Graphics is nice and good gameplay.
  53. r03vg
    Apr 15, 2020
    4
    Тир на рельсах с американской пропагандой. Карикатурно, шаблонно, бессмысленно.
  54. Freygan
    Mar 21, 2020
    7
    игра в уоторую досих пор захожу, поиграть несколько игр, приятные цвета.
  55. Sepherim
    Mar 3, 2020
    8
    La campaña de Call of Duty: WWII (no he jugado el multi) es tremendamente sólida. La historia vuelve a los oríngenes, la segunda guerra mundial, aunque en este caso centrado solo en el bando americano, desde el Desembarco de Normandía hasta la rendición nazi, aunque la acción principalmente ocurre en el camino hasta el invierno del 44. La historia de hermanos de guerra, del desarrollo deLa campaña de Call of Duty: WWII (no he jugado el multi) es tremendamente sólida. La historia vuelve a los oríngenes, la segunda guerra mundial, aunque en este caso centrado solo en el bando americano, desde el Desembarco de Normandía hasta la rendición nazi, aunque la acción principalmente ocurre en el camino hasta el invierno del 44. La historia de hermanos de guerra, del desarrollo de personajes, muy bien llevada aunque en general bastante típica. Eso si, con algunas escenas realmente impactantes. Las mecánicas de juego son las clásicas de un CoD, así que no han arriesgado nada, pero siguen resultando unos tiroteos potentes, bien llevados, y en la máxima dificultad son sin duda un reto. La variedad de armas es la habitual en la época, y se intercalan algunas escenas bastante bien llevadas tanto de sigilo, como de manejo de algunos vehículos.

    A nivel gráfico el juego sin duda es espectacular, tanto en ejecución como en diseño como en variedad (dentro de lo que permite la historia, claro). El sonido es contundente y potente y funciona bien, con una banda sonora que quizás pasa algo más desapercibida. Y, al menos en mi experiencia, no ha tenido bugs. Aunque el sistema de checkpoints obligatorios da algunos problemas cuando guarda en una situación donde estamos en alto peligro, y no hay forma de usar checkpoints anteriores salvo reempezar la misión.

    El resultado de todo ello es que es una campaña algo corta pero muy bien llevada.    … Expand
  56. Morphine_Child
    Feb 1, 2020
    3
    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's sake you can't even open the doors until your stupid AI scripted friends do it for you. Apparently you are too stupid to do it.

    AI is dumb and completely scripted like everything else. Sometimes they ignore you from 2m, sometimes they have laser accuracy, effectively killing all the fun of gunplay. Shame really.

    Visually the game is ok, on par with 2017 games, but then again, there are better looking games as well. Characters look good, but they are some of the most annoying characters ever in a WWII shooter. They are just painfully stereotypical...

    At the end... I haven't finished this game and I never will. And just to show why exactly everything in this game is devoid of any shape of inspiration and originality, play the tank mission. Here it's obvious that even people that made it never even played it. If you want to finish it, you have set your controls to maximum sensitivity or else you cannot even turn your turret fast enough to aim. Completely and utterly broken mission.

    Anyway, enough about it. Save your money and buy some old WWII classics.    … Expand
  57. DrawidsAR
    Jan 13, 2020
    10
    Для меня, наверное эта часть останется лучшей в серии. Забытая стилистика с хорошим графоном и приятной стрельбой. Звуки на высоте. Из-за того, что от сюжета я не ждал от слова "ничего", я приятно удивился, неожиданная завязка и пик приходятся на конец, что странно. Очень понравился механника с асистами от тимейтов.Для меня, наверное эта часть останется лучшей в серии. Забытая стилистика с хорошим графоном и приятной стрельбой. Звуки на высоте. Из-за того, что от сюжета я не ждал от слова "ничего", я приятно удивился, неожиданная завязка и пик приходятся на конец, что странно. Очень понравился механника с асистами от тимейтов.
  58. Gaidys1329
    Jan 9, 2020
    6
    Can't wait to see what Call of Duty: WWIII will be like. I hope it will be better than this game
  59. CreepGames
    Dec 21, 2019
    10
    The developers finally returned to the Second World War and not every starry warriors there, I really liked it. I strongly advise you not to regret it! I do not know why all users put ratings 0-3 because this game pulls on all 11!
  60. teamfranken91
    Dec 20, 2019
    2
    I created an account to review this game. It's fine (by which I mean bland and uninspired, but I mean it's a CoD SP campaign, so you know), but about two hours in I hit a tank level. The controls were *awful.* You can't really move the turret, except very slowly, and if you recenter your mouse, it stops swinging. You also can't really tell which direction your tank is facing, so you'llI created an account to review this game. It's fine (by which I mean bland and uninspired, but I mean it's a CoD SP campaign, so you know), but about two hours in I hit a tank level. The controls were *awful.* You can't really move the turret, except very slowly, and if you recenter your mouse, it stops swinging. You also can't really tell which direction your tank is facing, so you'll press W to advance and go sailing off to the right.

    This is aggravated by the fact that you're in a compact, urban setting, so you can expect to spend a lot of time getting stuck in corners and ramming into walls. Unfortunately, the point of the tank level is to destroy enemy tanks, which you can *only* do by flanking them, so in the unlikely event that you actually stumble upon an enemy tank's flank, good luck moving your turret into position before the tank turns to face you.

    I'm astounded that it got released in this state. Fortunately it only took me 2.5 hours to get there, so I was able to refund it.    … Expand
  61. penguin1
    Nov 5, 2019
    8
    I think the game was okay, I would give it a solid 7.5/10

    if you see it as an isolated COD game, i think its nice to go back to its WW2 roots, those grumpy on recycled content are just being whiny, if its based on WW2 as the title suggest, then of course we would expect the same battles, to which I think Activision and the Team at least bothered to come out with a narrative to try to    I think the game was okay, I would give it a solid 7.5/10

    if you see it as an isolated COD game, i think its nice to go back to its WW2 roots, those grumpy on recycled content are just being whiny, if its based on WW2 as the title suggest, then of course we would expect the same battles, to which I think Activision and the Team at least bothered to come out with a narrative to try to make it slightly different and refreshing, although it might come off as cheesy and meh, at least it was something new..

    so yes, although the Jeep/Car chase and Airplane missions are really unpolished,

    There are really fun epic moments too, I particularly enjoyed the mission as an infiltrator, and some of the battles on the open field.

    To me, it was a nice blast to the past, but in modern Graphic, its no where near Epic like the original COD, or MOH of the early 2000s, BUT, played as it is, just a single player campaign, it is really okay.

    Just, simple 8-9hours of simple fun. If you don't have high expectations, its mighty fine!    … Expand
  62. Duckers_McQuack
    Oct 31, 2019
    1
    As usual cod games doesn't run properly at all or just crashes. This one a damn lot. Crashes 90% of the time.
  63. TitaniumDragon
    Oct 24, 2019
    4
    Call of Duty: World War II is a generic FPS shooter set during World War II. From the landing at Normandy to the push to the Rhine, you and your band of brothers™ are off to save the free world from the Nazis. Through trials and trevails, you will yadda yadda.

    World War II games have a major flaw: we already know what happens. The course of the war is already set, because it’s based in    Call of Duty: World War II is a generic FPS shooter set during World War II. From the landing at Normandy to the push to the Rhine, you and your band of brothers™ are off to save the free world from the Nazis. Through trials and trevails, you will yadda yadda.

    World War II games have a major flaw: we already know what happens. The course of the war is already set, because it’s based in history. While the actual particular events can be made up, we know the general flow of things, and so it is very hard to surprise the audience in any meaningful way. Moreover, the audience rather EXPECTS to see many things out of a World War II game, such as the assault on the beaches of Normandy, or the Battle of the Bulge in a snowy forest around Christmas, so we not only know what is going to happen, we expect to see it.

    What this means, however, is that it is very hard to get all that attached to the events – it’s literally history. The characters in the game are all affable enough, but they could be… well, anyone, really. They’re meant to be stand ins for all the men who fought during World War II, and they work in that job, but at the same time, it all just kind of feels like we’re going through the motions at this point.

    This is compounded by the fact that World War II needs to play in a certain way to be historically accurate, which means that the weapons we use are not going to be particularly exciting or novel. They are a little bit clunkier than modern day FPS weapons by intent, and that’s fine, but the end result is that we’re playing a FPS using rather standard weapons in a standard war that cannot surprise us in any way.

    And for some reason, this game contains collectibles, which, if you go searching for them, interrupt the gameplay for no good reason. Why are these in a game like this? The heroic actions at least made sense – saving someone or accepting someone’s surrender seems like reasonable optional things that slot nicely into the core gameplay – but searching for random items in levels is just not fun in a game like this.

    The net result of all of this is a game that is like a bowl of oatmeal – it’s fine, there’s nothing WRONG with oatmeal, but we know exactly what we’re getting, and sadly, there’s no cinnamon in sight to spice it up, so it’s a bit bland and watery.

    So it is with this game. The controls are a fine example of modern FPS design, running around, sliding, crouching or going prone, walking up behind enemies for stealth kills, climbing up waist-high walls by jumping at them – but there’s nothing added here to spice things up. The story has only one possible way it can go, the particulars aren’t strong enough to really make me care about the characters (though at least I can remember their personalities), and the gameplay is bog standard.

    It’s kind of impossible to recommend something like this, but it was not bad to go through. It was just kind of forgettable.

    As for the multiplayer… honestly, I thought it was pretty bad. I’ve never really liked super low time to kill, and the multiplayer has that in spades. I actually did surprisingly well in the small amount of it I played – I saw a lot of other new players, probably because of the Humble Monthly – but at the same time, it never really engaged me all that much. Getting shot at kills you almost faster than you can react a great deal of the time, and the same applies to shooting at enemies, and the characters are all pretty generic, without anything to spice them up or make them all that interesting or distinctive. It is what it is.

    The zombies was honestly even worse. It’s amazing to me how, after Left 4 Dead did coop zombies so well, companies continue to make games that are vastly worse. This is just a horde shooting coop multiplayer mode with a single map (well, unless you fork over more money for more maps) with a series of things you need to do on it which aren’t explained very well. It was just kind of a mess to play, and I did not have a lot of fun playing it. The gameplay was only alright and the confusion about what I was supposed to do made it more annoying than anything else.

    For a game with such nice graphics, it felt strangely unambitious. Black Ops 3 at least tried to do some interesting things; this just kind of felt like the most generic shooter possible. It wasn’t bad, but it never rose to the level of good. It was just kind of bland.    … Expand
  64. SilverOrlov
    Sep 29, 2019
    8
    I don’t know about the historical authenticity of the missions in this game, but in terms of game-play and atmosphere, it’s a normal shooter. Well, if we consider this history, as if it were about some other World and the historical authenticity of our World would not be required, then the story itself is also made interesting.
  65. zNeverSleeping
    Jul 21, 2019
    3
    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa que me incomoda são as animações, que mais parecem de um jogo de PS2, estragando todo realismo que a engine poderia trazer - e não tras, de qualquer forma.    … Expand
  66. GGgame
    Jun 30, 2019
    0
    When ı started the game, at first level (D-DAY) ı said this will be good but in end ı said this is the worst call of duty ever. THANK YOU SO MUCH ACTİVİSİON, THİS GAME İS SUCKS. I WANT A KİLL DANIEL
  67. BENAN
    Jun 3, 2019
    10
    Otimo jogo , muito bem otimizado , não vá na onda dos haters , pois so jogo ta muito bom , historia , jogabilidade , a volta do terror com tudo nessa nova geração , finalmente um resident que presta .
  68. AlirezASlayeR
    May 2, 2019
    8
    After having played a good portion of the campaign I came here expecting glowing reviews! WTF?!
    The campaign doesn't quite live up to World at War but it still definitely holds its own in the set pieces. The stealth isn't overdone like in Battlefield and even though the premise of it even existing in a World War game it's a welcome change of pace and doesn't overstay its welcome (like in    After having played a good portion of the campaign I came here expecting glowing reviews! WTF?!
    The campaign doesn't quite live up to World at War but it still definitely holds its own in the set pieces. The stealth isn't overdone like in Battlefield and even though the premise of it even existing in a World War game it's a welcome change of pace and doesn't overstay its welcome (like in Battlefield where every other mission is a stealth one!!!)
    Yeah I guess you could say the guns don't sound that great and there's not a whole lot of variety but they still feel good (if a bit weak though... except the Kark98 that sh*t is fu**ing amazing!).
    The characters are a hit and miss for me... Pierson is kinda bland and the writing's a bit too cliched but Zussman is still pretty entertaining but I'd say characters are a weak point of the game (so far at least!).
    I also didn't care for the new medkit system at all! I think it's too distracting and breaks the immersion (one reason would be there's no option to for example hold down the medkit button and use 2 at the same time so it's a long wait to get back to the action)
    But overall the best things about the campaign are the set pieces and the over the top in-between segments that are genuinely exciting.
    In the end I'd say it's no World at War... but it comes damn close to it... if only it made us care more about the characters and had better writing.    … Expand
  69. BadgerBait
    Apr 22, 2019
    0
    Is there even a single player game or is it just one continuous cinematic? 5 minutes in and they are still trying to make me care about NPCs. If I wanted to watch a show about WWII I would have put on Band of Brothers.

    You get a 0 because if I don't get any game play in 5 minutes I have to assume there is no game to actually play.
  70. jelikey
    Mar 27, 2019
    8
    Well done Activision, after two years of successfully avoiding your yearly copy and paste but somehow simultaneously getting worse and worse I relented and bought this - mainly due to my affection of World at War. Well, it turns out that eight-year-old game is better in every single way. Congrats on the hype train, I bought a ticket - and now, after one day, I'm getting off. Abysmal.
  71. SRKNZ
    Mar 19, 2019
    2
    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game sell. Maybe, maybe not.

    What does help is creative varied game play and an acknowledgement that the USA was not the only country to fight the Axis. This gets a quick mention at the start in truth but then its USA all the way. No option whatsoever to play another allied or axis nation which would have made the game a lot more diverse and interesting.

    Whats also flawed in this game is like so many others its reliance on "push button" cut scenes where you try to destroy your keyboard attempting to do something pointless like a early on and quite frankly God awful tussle with a German soldier armed with a bayonet. This could and in my opinion should have been left out. It added nothing and the clumsy approach taken to key/mouse combinations was a usability nightmare.

    In short, in my opinion, this is mediocre fare that's repetitive and feels awkward due to the weird mouse key combo's used in the annoying, on best left in the recycle bin ", interactive" cut scenes. 2/10 from me.    … Expand
  72. SekOldwish
    Feb 10, 2019
    10
    Just giving a 10 because I really want to don't stop doing WW2 games. I enjoy the singleplayer campaing, but the story was too much "AMERICAN HERO STORY".
  73. realIK17
    Jan 23, 2019
    8
    This is a solid multiplayer game. My college friends and I sunk more than a week of total in-game time playing this game during the first semester of our senior year. I am not proud of it because normal college students should be partying or studying. However, this game did provide us with quality entertainment, and we spent a lot of time together. This experience brought us a lot closer.This is a solid multiplayer game. My college friends and I sunk more than a week of total in-game time playing this game during the first semester of our senior year. I am not proud of it because normal college students should be partying or studying. However, this game did provide us with quality entertainment, and we spent a lot of time together. This experience brought us a lot closer. When we got bored of this game, we would watch Workaholics or some of the new movies like Arrival (2016) pr Nerve (2016). So all and all, this game did improve my social life.… Expand
  74. jx819
    Dec 12, 2018
    7
    single player story not interesting. too many cut scenes you CAN"T skip through

    multiplayer a bit better. but still 6v6 max.

    and what the hell happened to zombies? COD AW zombies was amazing. not this dross.

    edit 12/18. +5 for zombies which was actually pretty good.
  75. kanedanoglory
    Nov 22, 2018
    7
    People are way too harsh on COD:WWII. I actually really liked the campaign and believe that the story was good (at least the cinematic story telling portion of the story). Only complaint is that the campaign wasn't long enough so it couldn't really develop more of the characters. In the end though, you really get to care about Daniels and Zussman, and understand the effect that war has onPeople are way too harsh on COD:WWII. I actually really liked the campaign and believe that the story was good (at least the cinematic story telling portion of the story). Only complaint is that the campaign wasn't long enough so it couldn't really develop more of the characters. In the end though, you really get to care about Daniels and Zussman, and understand the effect that war has on people (Pierson). It was very patriotic and promoted self-sacrifice and responsibility, which the world needs a lot more of. I absolutely HATE SJW stuff, and so glad that this game doesn't have any of that. It was true to history in the sense that yes, there were women in the SOE and they mainly did covert missions, and that blacks were not front line combatants, but were pushed to engineer and support/artillery roles; however, there were all black fighting units in the Ardennes and having Howard there was pretty cool. Having diversity for diversity sake is the stupidest thing ever, but following history and showing elements of what actually could have happened takes great writing that doesn't try to push an agenda.

    The campaign can be improved with the following 1) Get rid of quick time events (these things suck). 2) Stop yelling at the player to move on or forward to the next waypoint. Say it once then shut up. Otherwise, enforce a consequence to not following the orders. 3) Make it longer. 4) Get rid of multiplayer... so you can focus on making a longer campaign. 4) Add RPG elements... so you can take over writing stories and action sequences for games like Fallout because Bethesda sure as heck won't be doing anything good anymore.

    I would like the price to be cut to about $35 or so for just the campaign portion --I got a sale so it worked out for me. However, if you pack more stuff into the single player, I would gladly pay $60 or so for it.    … Expand
  76. rfz88
    Nov 18, 2018
    0
    Calling this a subpar experience is an understatement. This title does not deliver on any fronts (pun intended):

    SP: 0/10 (as expected with all CODs) MP: 1/10 (worse than the usual 4-5/10 in the past) This does not offer anything remotely enjoying in terms of GP, immersion or realism. This is a blatant racist game and an insult to all the nations who were involved in ww2. Avoid    Calling this a subpar experience is an understatement. This title does not deliver on any fronts (pun intended):

    SP: 0/10 (as expected with all CODs)
    MP: 1/10 (worse than the usual 4-5/10 in the past)

    This does not offer anything remotely enjoying in terms of GP, immersion or realism. This is a blatant racist game and an insult to all the nations who were involved in ww2.

    Avoid this like the cancer it is.    … Expand
  77. gold
    Nov 11, 2018
    7
    Сюжет - 8
    Графика - 9
    Геймплей - 5
    Музыка - 9
    Итог 7.750
  78. FOKq
    Oct 31, 2018
    1
    Разработчику, который делал миссию с танками, я бы вырвал руки и засунул их прямо в ***!!!
    Единица, только 1, большего эта игра недостойна
  79. TheGameIsALie
    Oct 5, 2018
    9
    Call of Duty: World War II é um jogo ao nível de Modern Warfare e é indubitavelmente um dos melhores FPS do ano, mesmo com poucos modos.
  80. lextrack
    Sep 17, 2018
    5
    Fui un iluso al pensar que COD con el regreso a sus raices (segunda guerra mundial) iba a tener un cambio enorme y que ahora si se lo tomarian en serio para que de alguna manera se recuperara esta saga tan repetitiva, hasta pensaba que habian mejorado los graficos debido al trailer que se nos mostro del juego y sorpresa... el juego tuvo un downgrade. Simplemente hice lo mas estupido y meFui un iluso al pensar que COD con el regreso a sus raices (segunda guerra mundial) iba a tener un cambio enorme y que ahora si se lo tomarian en serio para que de alguna manera se recuperara esta saga tan repetitiva, hasta pensaba que habian mejorado los graficos debido al trailer que se nos mostro del juego y sorpresa... el juego tuvo un downgrade. Simplemente hice lo mas estupido y me deje llevar por el hype y por la nostalgia, en este caso de la segunda guerra mundial y asi poder revivir momentos como los del COD 2 por ejemplo y es lamentable que en todo lo que intenta falla miserablemente.

    SINOPSIS

    La trama gira en torno a Red Daniels y su grupo de compañeros con los que viviremos en primera persona la ocupación de Francia, la ocupación de Bélgica y el cruce desde el río Rin hasta Alemania.

    PROS

    1-La ambientacion me gusta, todo lo relacionado con aquella guerra me encanta por ello me fascinan juegos como cod 1 o 2 incluyendo los medal of honor.

    2-Hay momentos contados con los dedos de una mano en los que podemos ser sigilosos, pero podemos dejar de lado el sigilo e ir a saco matando a todo lo que se nos cruce por delante.

    3-Un detalle que me gusta es que es mas sangriento y visceral de lo que se ha visto antes.

    4-Hay poco con referente al modo zombie pero es lo que mas me gusta de los cod.

    CONTRAS

    1-Conexion en el multijugador: Este es por lejos el problema mas grave de todos, el juego usa el sistema de HOST es decir que el juego designa el jugador con la mejor conexion para que sea el host de la partida y ahora ¿que hay de malo en eso? ejemplo: si el juego te mete a una partida con un frances el cual tiene mejor conexion que todos el sera host y la partida ira bien para los que sean de europa y yo que soy de latinoamerica tendria un ping por sobre 200. Explicar porque el juego te mete con gente de otros continentes es dificil, por lo que se sabe el juego reune una serie de factores tanto conexion, score, ratio v/d, tu habilidad en general etc y junta a la gente en una partida es basicamente un algoritmo que usa el juego para crear partidas. En mi experiencia 6 de cada 10 partidas tengo una conexion penosa, ni hablar de que el juego esta quedando muerto y esta costando encontrar partidas.

    2-Pudieron haber tomado esta ambientacion para hacer una historia genial y hacer batallas a gran escala con muchos soldados en el campo de batalla y teniendo la posibilidad de jugar en distintos bandos pero como siempre el juego esta cerrado solo al ejercito estadounidense, con una historia sin nada del otro mundo totalmente predecible y nada nos va a sorprender.

    3-En toda la campaña no empatice con ninguno de los compañeros de Daniels, no se llega a saber practicamente nada de ellos por lo que no se le toma casi ningun aprecio.

    4-La IA la siento mas torpe que en entregas anteriores tus aliados no le dan a nada, tu tienes que hacer todo el trabajo y con ello viene la increible capacidad que tienen los enemigos de resistir tus balas, los enemigos se sienten mas resistentes que antes practicamente son sacos que retienen plomo.

    5-Quizas a sledgehammer le parecio una buena idea poner vida no regenerativa pero el juego sigue estando diseñado para el tipico sistema de vida regenerativa, olvidate si quieres jugar en curtido o veterano.

    6-El rendimiento es malo comparado con titulos anteriores y esto puede sonarles tonto pero tuve problemas de rendimiento en la campaña y no en el multijugador. El juego lo tengo desde el primer dia de su lanzamiento asi que con todos los parches que han sacado puede que lo hayan arreglado, no he vuelto a tocar la campaña asi que no puedo asegurarles que esto haya mejorado.

    7-El multijugador en general es lo mismo de siempre no hay muchas vueltas que darle a pesar de haber añadido el nuevo modo llamado "War" el cual no es malo pero no es lo suficiente para darle mas frescura al multijugador.

    8-Graficamente no es la gran cosa hasta el Battlefield 3 tiene mejores graficos y eso que es un juego de 2011.

    9-Habian cheaters en la beta y sigue habiendo ahora.

    10- Y los logros? tiene solo quince logros (el multijugador) los cuales son una porqueria recuerdo el Black Ops III que tenia casi 100 logros los cuales eran desafiantes e incitaban a jugar y desbloquearlos.

    CONCLUSION

    El juego no sabe dejar malos habitos y no quiere reinventarse, este juego para mi ha sido una decepcion a nivel de campaña y multijugador.    … Expand
  81. allwititnowsuck
    Sep 13, 2018
    0
    A cheap rehash of Medal of Honor Allied Assault made out of jealousy of Battlefield 1's success,this series is already beaten to the ground,the only series more stupid and repetive i can think of is Grand Theft Auto because of forced controversies.Call of Duty on the other hand is playing safe all the time not trying anything new really. All guns in the game sounds like airsoft guns, theA cheap rehash of Medal of Honor Allied Assault made out of jealousy of Battlefield 1's success,this series is already beaten to the ground,the only series more stupid and repetive i can think of is Grand Theft Auto because of forced controversies.Call of Duty on the other hand is playing safe all the time not trying anything new really. All guns in the game sounds like airsoft guns, the violence is so tuned down it makes me wonder why is it 18+?Because of zombies or killing?With violence tuned down this low it should atleast 16+ unless we are still living in 90s and everything with a smallest drop of blood makes the game 18+....
    Don't even get me started on the upcoming Black Ops 4 this is pure embarrassment,jumping on a bandwagon of one weakest genre's of video games battle royal. If that won't teach them something then there is no hope for either series nor FPS genre as a whole.    … Expand
  82. Psy_pmP
    Sep 4, 2018
    1
    I do not know how about the whole game, but in the single player everything becomes clear from the very beginning. In the first level, you are shown how the developers **** on the players. Run from the fence to the fence, die Hundred times and it's unclear what to do. At this point, I deleted the game. The good did not buy this ****
  83. Fl0wAnima
    Jul 20, 2018
    2
    For 1.2 hours, I already say that this: FULL HUGE
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare: It was also done by Sledgehammer Games like WW2
    But some dick game is optically worse than the game of 2014 Multiplayer is more or less normal, but if optimization was normal .... The mechanics of shooting are not bad, the sounds are about nothing. Separately, about the game menu, the cartoon: Who did    For 1.2 hours, I already say that this: FULL HUGE
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare: It was also done by Sledgehammer Games like WW2
    But some dick game is optically worse than the game of 2014
    Multiplayer is more or less normal, but if optimization was normal ....
    The mechanics of shooting are not bad, the sounds are about nothing.
    Separately, about the game menu, the cartoon: Who did this menu, I do not need your help, I can do it myself, I'm so confused that I do not understand where the game starts to look, I waited 20 minutes for the game to connect to the game ...
    This is some kind of not respect for the players from the Sledgehammer games
    Sorry for my bad Eng language , i'm 14 years old Russian kid.    … Expand
  84. XitArS
    Jun 18, 2018
    6
    This is a Review on the Single-player aspect of the game since I do not play multiplayer. Not having played any CoD game since modern warfare 2 I must say that not much have changed. I bought this game because of the WW2 setting, since I remember how much I loved the Campaign back in the good old Days when CoD first came out. Since then (what is it, 15 years ago?) not that much haveThis is a Review on the Single-player aspect of the game since I do not play multiplayer. Not having played any CoD game since modern warfare 2 I must say that not much have changed. I bought this game because of the WW2 setting, since I remember how much I loved the Campaign back in the good old Days when CoD first came out. Since then (what is it, 15 years ago?) not that much have changed really. The gameplay is pretty much the same and even the Graphics almost looks the same :). Well to be fair, I'm sure the Graphics is much better nowadays, but let's be clear that compared to Battlefield or any other modern AAA game, the Graphics is very sub-par. Only the cut-scenes provide 2018-graphics. But it still does it's job. After a few minutes, you do get indulged in the game, despite the "ugliness" of it. The story of the Campaign is interesting, believable and has a good (mandatory) variation of stealth, tank driving, vehicle driving, assault and air-plane flying. It is of course an arcade and not a simulation. So be prepared for one Sherman to take on several tigers and one P51 to take down 20+ enemy fighters, but I guess the kiddies demand action and not realism. The Campaign is nowhere near the excellent Campaign of Modern warfare, but at least, I was never bored and the difficulty was about right. The cut-scenes were well made. Coming from more open World like games like Battlefield, you do of course feel a bit claustrophobic since the playable area is very confined, and in most cases there's only one path to go. Some levels (the stealth ones) do however present you with a somewhat larger map where you can choose from at least two or Three different paths. To sum it up: If you want to play an interesting semi-realistic story-driven WW2 shooter Campaign, and can live with dated Graphics and mechanics, then this game is a definitive buy. If you've played any CoD-game Before (even the one that dates 15 years ago) you'll know exactly what to expect.… Expand
  85. VETRA
    Jun 17, 2018
    1
    Sin gracia, soso, desfasado de salida en cuanto a graficos, la misma jugabilidad de siempre.
  86. Sanciny
    Jun 7, 2018
    9
    This is single-player review.
    At the beginning I was really skeptic but now I am totally surprised in positive way. I think this game is awesome.
    Pros: +graphics +audio +story +shooting +atmosphere +characters in your squad Cons: - I miss possibility to play for more nations - racing submissions - sometimes 3 hits with kar98k are not enough to kill enemy In conclusion, this    This is single-player review.
    At the beginning I was really skeptic but now I am totally surprised in positive way. I think this game is awesome.
    Pros:
    +graphics
    +audio
    +story
    +shooting
    +atmosphere
    +characters in your squad
    Cons:
    - I miss possibility to play for more nations
    - racing submissions
    - sometimes 3 hits with kar98k are not enough to kill enemy

    In conclusion, this game is funny and that is what any game is supposed to be. I really enjoy this COD.    … Expand
  87. EnclaveMK2
    Jun 3, 2018
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Actually not a worst Call Of Duty, but still very scripted which is annoying sometimes. For example all these scripted scenes with slo-mo and pistol. One time thru the game - it`s good, it`s normal, two times - not so good, three times - becomes bothersome. Flak missions looks so silly - one man shoot out 15-20 planes, am i playing Just Cause and etc. or WW2 historical game? And i even cant burn my character in bonfire in the Epilogue mission. Add to all this unconfortable interface in Multiplayer mode.… Expand
  88. Jargentium15
    Jun 2, 2018
    4
    is a game with a terrible downgrade, the same gameplay and the story mode is bland , I thought that this COD was going to be better game for its setting in World War II, but in the end this COD is a disappointment
  89. Warmuro
    Apr 29, 2018
    2
    They tried to keep up with Battlefield 1, they failed miserably. We don't need another CoD for the next 20 years, i'm sure of that.
  90. LillDeeDee
    Apr 27, 2018
    4
    This is probably the best example of how hype destroys games...

    COD WW2, for me a title that made me hope for a new era of cod - well no, you dun **** it up! Before I get to the annoying stuff, lemme talk what this game does good/new in comparison to older cod shooters... (I played waw, bo2 and bo3 before) Headquarters: Yes, this may not be the newest thing in gaming history, a    This is probably the best example of how hype destroys games...

    COD WW2, for me a title that made me hope for a new era of cod - well no, you dun **** it up!

    Before I get to the annoying stuff, lemme talk what this game does good/new in comparison to older cod shooters... (I played waw, bo2 and bo3 before)

    Headquarters: Yes, this may not be the newest thing in gaming history, a lot of other games like destiny had that before ... but to cod this was an actual refreshing idea... Shooting range, a place where you can try out several score streaks, a 1 v 1 place... This is stuff I really liked to see!

    Zombies: Yes, people may b like - the **** you talking about! This is not the zombies we wanted but tbh I really loved the idea of having sum sort of little side campaign as zombie mode. This was sth a little bit new and more casual easter egg hunting made the mode a better option for a bigger amount of people. Of course, in order to achieve the best possible ending, you had to find hidden stuff and that's were zombies goes back to the og ee hunting. The only thing that was quite cheap were the ground spawns... especially those overused jumpscares spawns... those were good for the first time playign the zombies mode, but that's actually it... The boss fight was quite interesting even tho it felt a little bit too easy.

    The only good mission in the campaing - the pilot mission: Taking over some mechanics from older plane fight simulators, this was a quite refreshing mission. The controls sometimes felt clunky but in overall I had more fun than the rest of the campaign.

    Now lets go to the bad stuff!

    Repetitive COD gene: This game is, as from the community expected nothing special... it was overhyped and nothing new.

    Campaign: I like the sort of Brotherhood part in the campaign but the rest of it is quite BORING. It's short, it's repetitive AND the ending was the most anticlimatic bs ever... Especially the stealth missions were horrible... Over the top cutscenes and there were no really interesting characters in there.

    The tank mission: Holy crap, this one was hella annoying to play through... The controls felt clunky and it also felt like this tank wasn't rly responding to my pissed of button smashing... I wish there was on option to get out of the tank and destroy the enemy tank with explosives or stuff... In end this mission was hella anticlimatic and painful...

    Multiplayer... The core of every cod: Welp - the new stuff is no fun (war mode, it's literally the worst mode ingame). Like every other cod you get to the point where you just have no fun BUT in this game - it only took me 10 hours to say - NOPE, not gonna do that! We have the classic modes like tdm, dom and snd, every map has nearly the same layout... The loadout system, now changed into divisions, gives you NO freedom of creating fun classes... it's like this game tried to be less casual and more competitive... There are also just 3 weapons that you wanna use in the future: Bar, PPsh and the kar... the lmgs are again not worth the time, the shotguns are hella annoying but also useless... The thing that made bo3 good, was that every gun was hella interesting to use and to play with - you had soo much freedom in creating custom classes ... where is that? That was literally the only thing that made cod's multiplayer have such a high replay value... For me this game gets a 4/10... I would've love to give it less than 4, thats how pissed I was for spending 60 euro on that game - but i just can't ignore how fun it sometimes was and how they at least tried to do sth. new...

    After a total amount of 50 hours, I stopped playing that game.    … Expand
  91. RustyCoin
    Apr 25, 2018
    3
    I am not judging this game only because it has COD brand on it, by any means no. This game is one of the worst PC games in 2017 because it's not a game-only anymore. It's half a movie right now. And this have been happening since Black Ops 1. It was not so terribly cutscenes-based "game" as it is now, but it started at that point. And what we have now? We have - 5-10 minutes of gameplay,I am not judging this game only because it has COD brand on it, by any means no. This game is one of the worst PC games in 2017 because it's not a game-only anymore. It's half a movie right now. And this have been happening since Black Ops 1. It was not so terribly cutscenes-based "game" as it is now, but it started at that point. And what we have now? We have - 5-10 minutes of gameplay, 15-20 minutes cutscenes and the circle goes on. So you get the objective, you go, do some shooting, throw grenades, boom - movie (infinte amount of cutscenes).

    And the quotes in those cutscenes...my god...they are terrible. Seriously, cutscenes like those exist only in bad war movies - "you're long way from texas boy".....

    Multiplayer is also nothing new - boring, monotonous, repetitive stuff, as every year.

    Reason why I'm giving this game 3 out of 10 is because graphics are kinda good actually (although I believe BF 1 still looks better), and visual effects. On big screen or TV effects looks really well. Other than that COD WW2 is a terrible product with boring story, stupid AI, uninteresting characters, lack of variety...the list could go on and on.    … Expand
  92. gunnaholic
    Apr 21, 2018
    0
    I don't review games ever, but this game is such an utterly infuriating steaming pile that I couldn't not review this thing. Where to start? I guess the short list of pros.

    - The player card customization options and emotes give the game just a bit of personality. - It looks decent. - The quartermaster missions add more of a reason to keep playing - The zombies is fun for a few    I don't review games ever, but this game is such an utterly infuriating steaming pile that I couldn't not review this thing. Where to start? I guess the short list of pros.

    - The player card customization options and emotes give the game just a bit of personality.
    - It looks decent.
    - The quartermaster missions add more of a reason to keep playing
    - The zombies is fun for a few playthroughs if you have friends
    - Gun game is pretty fun
    - It was nice to see them bring back War, which was introduced in WaW, although it's not worth playing for reasons stated later.
    - I kinda like what they were doing with divisions, but they're almost pointless and the system needs a major overhaul.
    - It's fun to get in a custom game with friends and do stupid modes like shovels only
    The cons

    - This game still has that basic CoD formula that hasn't had any major changes since WaW. It's painfully outdated and CoD will need to really pull something crazy if they want the series to have a future.
    - While the game does look good, it goes for a generic "look realistic" art style that takes no creativity, and is therefore lifeless and void of almost any personality.
    - The map balancing is completely broken to the point that is needs to be scrapped to be redeemed. The spawnpoints for every base game map is the same layout: a small piece of cover with three chokepoints, a left mid and right. If you can wipe the other team and get to their spawn at the beginning of the match, you have won the match. The enemy team will be cowering behind their spawn cover because they can't move anywhere because your team already has peak advantage on them and unless they have incredible aim will get outgunned. Just run back and forth, and you win. If somehow you get two teams who suck equally, this won't happen. But it's in situations like these that the poorly designed map flow is highlighted the most, as spawns seem to happen randomly, making team coordination of any kind almost impossible. The map flow is so broken that I almost think that Treyarch were going for a spawn trap based game. This makes any team based mode with respawn essentially unplayable. So you should just stick to FFA and S&D right? Then you will see the...
    - Horrible gun balancing. Each class of weapon should have their own strong points and weak points that make them balanced, SMGs having short to mid range low time to kill, LMGs providing long range automatic fire, the assault rifles being a balance, and the shotgun and sniper having extreme short and long range capabilities, respectively. The main problem with the gun balancing here is the LMGs. They combine below AR recoil, above AR damage and SMG time to kill. They render the ARs and SMGs existences pointless. Shotguns in games like these are notorious for being hard to balance and therefore being absurdly OP. In WWII, they are almost useless. The range on these things is, no exaggeration, no more than a 10 foot one shot kill. Unless you're a hyper cautious building lurker, you won't have any success with these. The snipers are the only guns in this game that were well balanced, although it's really difficult to mess up sniper balancing. In short, this game needs a complete balance overhaul to work at all.
    - The cashgrab DLCs. Both of the DLCs as of writing this (Resistance and War Machine) add 3 new maps, a new war map and a zombies map. Keep in mind this game has 9, count them 9, base game multiplayer maps. Compare this to MW3's 16 base game maps or BO2's 14. Which means after you pay 60 dollars for base game and 30 dollars in DLC, only then do you get up to the content that previous installments of the game had. It baffles me that they can get away with this. As of the last time I checked, on PC you could only buy the 60 dollar season pass for some reason, and it was the only platform that they did this to. As if PC CoD wasn't dead enough as it is.
    - I don't own any of the DLCs, but from what I've heard the multiplayer maps vary widely in terms of quality and the zombies maps are garbage.
    - I don't like the menu system at all, it's a pain to navigate.
    In conclusion, this game is an irredeemable, pathetically lazy excuse for an AAA game that would be ridiculed if it was released by anyone else under any other name. You could spend your 60 dollars on a myriad on compelling, creative indie games that aren't devoid of any life or personality like this worthless garbage heap of a game.    … Expand
  93. orianC-137
    Mar 27, 2018
    8
    My expectations for this game weren’t to high and I was afraid that it wouldn’t live up to the hype. But... when I soon after I started playing the game I understood that I was wrong this game was one of the most fun games I have ever played.
    The story is great and the multiplayer is exceptionally well.
    So who is this game for: 1. People that have the money cuz this game is so freaking    My expectations for this game weren’t to high and I was afraid that it wouldn’t live up to the hype. But... when I soon after I started playing the game I understood that I was wrong this game was one of the most fun games I have ever played.
    The story is great and the multiplayer is exceptionally well.
    So who is this game for:
    1. People that have the money cuz this game is so freaking prissy.
    2. People that like or are fine with playing single player because single player is one of the best and main things in the game plus the multiplayer is fine but not as fun as other multiplayer games like CSGO but we still need to wait a little bit before we know if it’s good or just fine because not enough people are playing at the moment so some game mods like capture the flag, nazi zombies and more are not working cuz not Enough people are playing at the moment. and also more updates are coming so that also may make the experience better.

    Again the game came out yesterday so the game may become better in the future from updates.    … Expand
  94. 5thy
    Mar 20, 2018
    2
    This is the only COD game that I didn't replay (except for Infinite Warfare and Black ops 3 which I refused to play). The reason was that the game was absolutely boring. I haven't tried the multiplayer yet, but the SP was awful. I felt like I was watching a mediocre military film about WW2, based on true events.
    Aiming through a scope was a real pain in the ass. Also experiences a number    This is the only COD game that I didn't replay (except for Infinite Warfare and Black ops 3 which I refused to play). The reason was that the game was absolutely boring. I haven't tried the multiplayer yet, but the SP was awful. I felt like I was watching a mediocre military film about WW2, based on true events.
    Aiming through a scope was a real pain in the ass. Also experiences a number of glitches and fps drop.
    Also what on earth were russian PPSH machine guns doing on Omaha???
    I really hope if there' s another COD about WWII, it'll look more like World at war.    … Expand
  95. koolaidman486
    Mar 14, 2018
    1
    Primarily multiplayer:
    this is better than console, I'll give it that but there are several problems:
    -The hit detection is deplorable -Weapon balance is a joke -Miss quickscoping? Sad to say, its back and more OP than ever -Bad anti-cheat -Looks worse than World at War -Poorly optimized, I drop frames on worse than recommended settings with much of any weather in there -You will    Primarily multiplayer:
    this is better than console, I'll give it that but there are several problems:
    -The hit detection is deplorable
    -Weapon balance is a joke
    -Miss quickscoping? Sad to say, its back and more OP than ever
    -Bad anti-cheat
    -Looks worse than World at War
    -Poorly optimized, I drop frames on worse than recommended settings with much of any weather in there
    -You will unload magazines into people only to not kill them, let alone a hit even registering

    I will never recommend this game, not even to my worst enemy.    … Expand
  96. WarBear0003
    Feb 28, 2018
    6
    Despite it's return to its roots to the Second World War, CoD:WWII is one of my least favourite FPS. The campaign is too linear and not interesting compared to other CoD campaigns. Multiplayer was quite balanced and the Division System is a good idea. War mode is also surpirsingly fun and exciting. In spite of this, MP is too random and unpredictable. It is frustrating when you just keepDespite it's return to its roots to the Second World War, CoD:WWII is one of my least favourite FPS. The campaign is too linear and not interesting compared to other CoD campaigns. Multiplayer was quite balanced and the Division System is a good idea. War mode is also surpirsingly fun and exciting. In spite of this, MP is too random and unpredictable. It is frustrating when you just keep on getting hit markers and not killing the enemy.
    Although CoD:WWII is somewhat fun and graphically awe-inspiring, the campaign's linear playstyle and the randomness of the MP puts off my experience. You'd be better off getting Black Ops 2 or Modern Warfare if you want a boots on the ground experience.    … Expand
  97. leMMingSlayeR
    Feb 23, 2018
    3
    I'm going to focus on the multiplayer part of this game, and I can sum it up in two words. Just awful.

    From a technical standpoint this game is very poorly made. Not only are the player hitboxes worse in this game than any previous CoD I've played (just about all of them since MW), but the game itself is so buggy and hitchy my FPS go from 130 down to 40 and shoot right back up to 130.    I'm going to focus on the multiplayer part of this game, and I can sum it up in two words. Just awful.

    From a technical standpoint this game is very poorly made. Not only are the player hitboxes worse in this game than any previous CoD I've played (just about all of them since MW), but the game itself is so buggy and hitchy my FPS go from 130 down to 40 and shoot right back up to 130. I have also experienced shadow and texture pop-in, and more than one hard freeze.

    Add to this the fact that it took 3 system reboots and finally a launch in safe mode just to get the game to launch to the main menu.

    I am seriously disappointed with this game, seems like Activision doesn't really care about quality anymore so long as they can get a studio to crank out another installment every single year.

    Sledgehammer games did an amazing job on MW3, it is to this day one of my favorite in the franchise (MW2 takes the top spot) but this installment just doesn't seem to live up to the quality I hav experienced in other Sledgehammer games.

    I will say that the campaign was very good, and had what I thought was the best narrative of any CoD game in the last decade. I did play the campaign on the PS4 version however, as even with the lower fidelity and 30FPS, I had a noticeably more stable experience.

    In the end it is the technical difficulties that ruined the experience for me.

    System Specs:

    Ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
    16GB DDR4 3200
    EVGA GTX 1070 SC
    850EVO SSD
    Asus ROG Strix 144hz 1080p monitor    … Expand
  98. xoma262
    Feb 14, 2018
    0
    I hope developers would suffer for the rest of their live! I cannot understand how they released this piece of garbage. JUST LET THE SERIES DIE. Stop doing that ****
  99. kusogame
    Feb 3, 2018
    0
    Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history.
  100. Kikratos
    Jan 25, 2018
    3
    Overall, I do not recommend this game. Especially if you're looking for something similar to the previous series titles in World War II.

    The campaign mode disappointed me, it has a very boring and extremely short story, very different from what I played in the past in titles for Playstation 2. 50% of the phrases spoken by the characters contain "Zussman" (name of one of the    Overall, I do not recommend this game. Especially if you're looking for something similar to the previous series titles in World War II.

    The campaign mode disappointed me, it has a very boring and extremely short story, very different from what I played in the past in titles for Playstation 2.

    50% of the phrases spoken by the characters contain "Zussman" (name of one of the characters), this really annoyed!! The whole story of the game is about this guy.

    I noticed that the developers wanted to prioritize the multiplayer mode, which, in my opinion, should not even exist. And "Zombie Mode" is very rough.

    The graphics are great. Gameplay without any innovation, is the same as the other modern CoD.

    Anyway, I played because I'm a fan of the series, but no chance to play it again. I do not recommend it!    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

21
#21 Most Discussed PC Game of 2017
20
#20 Most Shared PC Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 21
  3. Negative: 1 out of 21
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Jan 6, 2018
    50
    Familiarity breeds contempt. [Issue#269, p.49]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 2, 2018
    80
    The new Call of Duty is like a shopping list, in which the devs list one second-rate cliché after another. It's not always for the sake of it, but it's already making the WWII unique that everybody should play. [Issue#280]
  3. Games.cz
    Jan 2, 2018
    70
    A magnificent, but also a sympathetic, unpretentious return to the roots of the series. Yet the campaign is short-lived, and your next experience depends on how much you enjoy the multiplayer and/or shooting Nazi zombies.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »