Call of Duty: WWII

 PC
User Score
4.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 989 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 280 out of 989
  2. Mixed: 211 out of 989
  3. Negative: 498 out of 989
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. TitaniumDragon
    Oct 24, 2019
    4
    Call of Duty: World War II is a generic FPS shooter set during World War II. From the landing at Normandy to the push to the Rhine, you and your band of brothers™ are off to save the free world from the Nazis. Through trials and trevails, you will yadda yadda.

    World War II games have a major flaw: we already know what happens. The course of the war is already set, because it’s based in    Call of Duty: World War II is a generic FPS shooter set during World War II. From the landing at Normandy to the push to the Rhine, you and your band of brothers™ are off to save the free world from the Nazis. Through trials and trevails, you will yadda yadda.

    World War II games have a major flaw: we already know what happens. The course of the war is already set, because it’s based in history. While the actual particular events can be made up, we know the general flow of things, and so it is very hard to surprise the audience in any meaningful way. Moreover, the audience rather EXPECTS to see many things out of a World War II game, such as the assault on the beaches of Normandy, or the Battle of the Bulge in a snowy forest around Christmas, so we not only know what is going to happen, we expect to see it.

    What this means, however, is that it is very hard to get all that attached to the events – it’s literally history. The characters in the game are all affable enough, but they could be… well, anyone, really. They’re meant to be stand ins for all the men who fought during World War II, and they work in that job, but at the same time, it all just kind of feels like we’re going through the motions at this point.

    This is compounded by the fact that World War II needs to play in a certain way to be historically accurate, which means that the weapons we use are not going to be particularly exciting or novel. They are a little bit clunkier than modern day FPS weapons by intent, and that’s fine, but the end result is that we’re playing a FPS using rather standard weapons in a standard war that cannot surprise us in any way.

    And for some reason, this game contains collectibles, which, if you go searching for them, interrupt the gameplay for no good reason. Why are these in a game like this? The heroic actions at least made sense – saving someone or accepting someone’s surrender seems like reasonable optional things that slot nicely into the core gameplay – but searching for random items in levels is just not fun in a game like this.

    The net result of all of this is a game that is like a bowl of oatmeal – it’s fine, there’s nothing WRONG with oatmeal, but we know exactly what we’re getting, and sadly, there’s no cinnamon in sight to spice it up, so it’s a bit bland and watery.

    So it is with this game. The controls are a fine example of modern FPS design, running around, sliding, crouching or going prone, walking up behind enemies for stealth kills, climbing up waist-high walls by jumping at them – but there’s nothing added here to spice things up. The story has only one possible way it can go, the particulars aren’t strong enough to really make me care about the characters (though at least I can remember their personalities), and the gameplay is bog standard.

    It’s kind of impossible to recommend something like this, but it was not bad to go through. It was just kind of forgettable.

    As for the multiplayer… honestly, I thought it was pretty bad. I’ve never really liked super low time to kill, and the multiplayer has that in spades. I actually did surprisingly well in the small amount of it I played – I saw a lot of other new players, probably because of the Humble Monthly – but at the same time, it never really engaged me all that much. Getting shot at kills you almost faster than you can react a great deal of the time, and the same applies to shooting at enemies, and the characters are all pretty generic, without anything to spice them up or make them all that interesting or distinctive. It is what it is.

    The zombies was honestly even worse. It’s amazing to me how, after Left 4 Dead did coop zombies so well, companies continue to make games that are vastly worse. This is just a horde shooting coop multiplayer mode with a single map (well, unless you fork over more money for more maps) with a series of things you need to do on it which aren’t explained very well. It was just kind of a mess to play, and I did not have a lot of fun playing it. The gameplay was only alright and the confusion about what I was supposed to do made it more annoying than anything else.

    For a game with such nice graphics, it felt strangely unambitious. Black Ops 3 at least tried to do some interesting things; this just kind of felt like the most generic shooter possible. It wasn’t bad, but it never rose to the level of good. It was just kind of bland.    … Expand
  2. SKELETOR420
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    I know many don't care for the single player but I'll always play it first. Campaign on PC (with gamepad) was an utter joke. Hit detection issues at least 1/3rd of the time. The levels are literally just corridors. The story is largely by the numbers and uninspired. A massively wasted opportunity. Compared to what IW and Treyarch have been putting out: Sledgehammer need to be taken offI know many don't care for the single player but I'll always play it first. Campaign on PC (with gamepad) was an utter joke. Hit detection issues at least 1/3rd of the time. The levels are literally just corridors. The story is largely by the numbers and uninspired. A massively wasted opportunity. Compared to what IW and Treyarch have been putting out: Sledgehammer need to be taken off CoD; their entries have always felt like a step backwards. It'll take a killer game to get me back into this series now.… Expand
  3. downliner
    Nov 7, 2017
    4
    If you are hoping to learn some history from this game then the only thing you will learn is America saves the day which as we all know is not how it happened.

    Come on people the War didn't start on D-Day :P And if a publisher says "factually and historically accurate" then comes out with a low budget Hollywood flick it doesn't really matter. You'll still buy it :P You know i've    If you are hoping to learn some history from this game then the only thing you will learn is America saves the day which as we all know is not how it happened.

    Come on people the War didn't start on D-Day :P

    And if a publisher says "factually and historically accurate" then comes out with a low budget Hollywood flick it doesn't really matter. You'll still buy it :P

    You know i've been in the Marketing industry for over 16 years and it still rings true to this day that Gamers are the easiest to influence into buying crap and the Publishers know this only too well.

    They used a tragic event to sell a game and most millenials cannot even tell the difference between an Iron Cross and a Swastika let alone the history behind either one so what does it mattter?

    The fact you even bought into this pile of trash in the first place blows the "Fool me once" line out of the water because with gamers were are onto "Fool me 17 times..." and still have no end in sight.    … Expand
  4. CaptainPuGDoG
    Nov 16, 2017
    4
    Spend 40+ hours
    Story 2/10 So stuipid history,where Great America try to win war,a lot of hero doing dont many actions don't make sense,just 2 or 3 interesting missions, all other is a ****
    Mp 5/10 After 10 or 15 hours,play it is very boring and there is not any interest
  5. voodoo_911
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    این بازی کاملا از روی بتلفیلد کپی برداشته شده بود و متاسفانه به قدری خسته کننده و ضعیف بود که فقط دوست داشتم این بازی هرچه سریعتر تموم بشه.
    It was very weak and tedious and was completely copied from battlefield
    I was really sorry about this game
  6. k_flint
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    The single player campaign is mediocre. The one thing I couldn't get out of my head - I've seen all this before. It's like the developers took all the stuff that worked in old WW2 shooters and put it in one VERY short campaign. The redeeming side to it are the good looking cut-scenes in which the voice actors did a good job, though the script was half-assed. The campaign is the only goodThe single player campaign is mediocre. The one thing I couldn't get out of my head - I've seen all this before. It's like the developers took all the stuff that worked in old WW2 shooters and put it in one VERY short campaign. The redeeming side to it are the good looking cut-scenes in which the voice actors did a good job, though the script was half-assed. The campaign is the only good thing in this game, at least I had some fun with it. If it was twice as long, I would give this game a 7.
    As for the multiplayer... It is an underwhelming experience.

    This is the last time I had bought a CoD game. I hoped returning to the roots would save the franchise, but I was wrong. RIP    … Expand
  7. nachtgold
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    It is nearly impossible to play multiplayer because your are lost in the console menu. It lasts hours before you find out where and how you can open a game or join with a friend.

    The single player campaign is ok, but sometimes frustrating.
  8. Rachaque
    Nov 10, 2017
    4
    I was enjoying the game until the Collateral Damage mission. It is unplayable on PC; life is too short to get this frustrated because of a video game. The controls on PC in this mission seems like a very poor port from consoles. Deleted after about 40% of the game.
  9. DubtCZ
    Nov 29, 2017
    4
    Censored **** So much stealth-like gameplay. Nothing interesting. Strong Female Character!
    Multiplayer is same like always.
    Does it worth a buy: If you are blind sheep - YES
    If you wanted authentic to WW2 - NO
  10. LillDeeDee
    Apr 27, 2018
    4
    This is probably the best example of how hype destroys games...

    COD WW2, for me a title that made me hope for a new era of cod - well no, you dun **** it up! Before I get to the annoying stuff, lemme talk what this game does good/new in comparison to older cod shooters... (I played waw, bo2 and bo3 before) Headquarters: Yes, this may not be the newest thing in gaming history, a    This is probably the best example of how hype destroys games...

    COD WW2, for me a title that made me hope for a new era of cod - well no, you dun **** it up!

    Before I get to the annoying stuff, lemme talk what this game does good/new in comparison to older cod shooters... (I played waw, bo2 and bo3 before)

    Headquarters: Yes, this may not be the newest thing in gaming history, a lot of other games like destiny had that before ... but to cod this was an actual refreshing idea... Shooting range, a place where you can try out several score streaks, a 1 v 1 place... This is stuff I really liked to see!

    Zombies: Yes, people may b like - the **** you talking about! This is not the zombies we wanted but tbh I really loved the idea of having sum sort of little side campaign as zombie mode. This was sth a little bit new and more casual easter egg hunting made the mode a better option for a bigger amount of people. Of course, in order to achieve the best possible ending, you had to find hidden stuff and that's were zombies goes back to the og ee hunting. The only thing that was quite cheap were the ground spawns... especially those overused jumpscares spawns... those were good for the first time playign the zombies mode, but that's actually it... The boss fight was quite interesting even tho it felt a little bit too easy.

    The only good mission in the campaing - the pilot mission: Taking over some mechanics from older plane fight simulators, this was a quite refreshing mission. The controls sometimes felt clunky but in overall I had more fun than the rest of the campaign.

    Now lets go to the bad stuff!

    Repetitive COD gene: This game is, as from the community expected nothing special... it was overhyped and nothing new.

    Campaign: I like the sort of Brotherhood part in the campaign but the rest of it is quite BORING. It's short, it's repetitive AND the ending was the most anticlimatic bs ever... Especially the stealth missions were horrible... Over the top cutscenes and there were no really interesting characters in there.

    The tank mission: Holy crap, this one was hella annoying to play through... The controls felt clunky and it also felt like this tank wasn't rly responding to my pissed of button smashing... I wish there was on option to get out of the tank and destroy the enemy tank with explosives or stuff... In end this mission was hella anticlimatic and painful...

    Multiplayer... The core of every cod: Welp - the new stuff is no fun (war mode, it's literally the worst mode ingame). Like every other cod you get to the point where you just have no fun BUT in this game - it only took me 10 hours to say - NOPE, not gonna do that! We have the classic modes like tdm, dom and snd, every map has nearly the same layout... The loadout system, now changed into divisions, gives you NO freedom of creating fun classes... it's like this game tried to be less casual and more competitive... There are also just 3 weapons that you wanna use in the future: Bar, PPsh and the kar... the lmgs are again not worth the time, the shotguns are hella annoying but also useless... The thing that made bo3 good, was that every gun was hella interesting to use and to play with - you had soo much freedom in creating custom classes ... where is that? That was literally the only thing that made cod's multiplayer have such a high replay value... For me this game gets a 4/10... I would've love to give it less than 4, thats how pissed I was for spending 60 euro on that game - but i just can't ignore how fun it sometimes was and how they at least tried to do sth. new...

    After a total amount of 50 hours, I stopped playing that game.    … Expand
  11. Jargentium15
    Jun 2, 2018
    4
    is a game with a terrible downgrade, the same gameplay and the story mode is bland , I thought that this COD was going to be better game for its setting in World War II, but in the end this COD is a disappointment
  12. Denis94
    Jun 22, 2021
    4
    Activision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una granActivision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una gran ambición, se salvan los gráficos y el modo zombis que es bastante interesante.… Expand
  13. r03vg
    Apr 15, 2020
    4
    Тир на рельсах с американской пропагандой. Карикатурно, шаблонно, бессмысленно.
  14. Murdockk
    Jun 27, 2023
    4
    Call of duty bir gelecek bir geçmiş yaparak aklımız ile oynuyor.xxxxxxxxxxx
  15. matdevine21
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes. My main problem with this supposed next generation    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes.
    My main problem with this supposed next generation of maps is that they are no different than last gen, where is the dynamic settings? why cant there be a physical changes to the map randomly i.e. a battle on a sinking battleship or a war around you with buildings exploding? its just lazy and derriviative but compared to what Activision charges for season pass / map packs its just insulting!

    Loot crates are obviously there, disgusting to have them opening on normandy batlefield in your "social area" and visable to all, there really isnt an "enough money earned here" is there!

    Overall I feel more down on the franchise now than ever before, it needs to go away and have a high level rethink about COD's future as come next year, COD will not be a pre order or even a day one purchase for me!    … Expand
  16. RomanG700
    Nov 15, 2017
    3
    A game with pretty decent visuals and sound. And that's all the pro's we got for 60$. Gameplay haven't changed for the past 10 years at all. It still welcomes us with 5x5 meter maps and 12 players at once. Wooden physics, crappy animation, tons of kids with cheats, lots of microtransactions - here is what you'll get, when you buy this. As for single-player - it still sucks. Dumb plot,A game with pretty decent visuals and sound. And that's all the pro's we got for 60$. Gameplay haven't changed for the past 10 years at all. It still welcomes us with 5x5 meter maps and 12 players at once. Wooden physics, crappy animation, tons of kids with cheats, lots of microtransactions - here is what you'll get, when you buy this. As for single-player - it still sucks. Dumb plot, boring characters, faceless locations - it's the top of the iceberg. Don't waste your dollars and nerves.… Expand
  17. leMMingSlayeR
    Feb 23, 2018
    3
    I'm going to focus on the multiplayer part of this game, and I can sum it up in two words. Just awful.

    From a technical standpoint this game is very poorly made. Not only are the player hitboxes worse in this game than any previous CoD I've played (just about all of them since MW), but the game itself is so buggy and hitchy my FPS go from 130 down to 40 and shoot right back up to 130.    I'm going to focus on the multiplayer part of this game, and I can sum it up in two words. Just awful.

    From a technical standpoint this game is very poorly made. Not only are the player hitboxes worse in this game than any previous CoD I've played (just about all of them since MW), but the game itself is so buggy and hitchy my FPS go from 130 down to 40 and shoot right back up to 130. I have also experienced shadow and texture pop-in, and more than one hard freeze.

    Add to this the fact that it took 3 system reboots and finally a launch in safe mode just to get the game to launch to the main menu.

    I am seriously disappointed with this game, seems like Activision doesn't really care about quality anymore so long as they can get a studio to crank out another installment every single year.

    Sledgehammer games did an amazing job on MW3, it is to this day one of my favorite in the franchise (MW2 takes the top spot) but this installment just doesn't seem to live up to the quality I hav experienced in other Sledgehammer games.

    I will say that the campaign was very good, and had what I thought was the best narrative of any CoD game in the last decade. I did play the campaign on the PS4 version however, as even with the lower fidelity and 30FPS, I had a noticeably more stable experience.

    In the end it is the technical difficulties that ruined the experience for me.

    System Specs:

    Ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
    16GB DDR4 3200
    EVGA GTX 1070 SC
    850EVO SSD
    Asus ROG Strix 144hz 1080p monitor    … Expand
  18. Kikratos
    Jan 25, 2018
    3
    Overall, I do not recommend this game. Especially if you're looking for something similar to the previous series titles in World War II.

    The campaign mode disappointed me, it has a very boring and extremely short story, very different from what I played in the past in titles for Playstation 2. 50% of the phrases spoken by the characters contain "Zussman" (name of one of the    Overall, I do not recommend this game. Especially if you're looking for something similar to the previous series titles in World War II.

    The campaign mode disappointed me, it has a very boring and extremely short story, very different from what I played in the past in titles for Playstation 2.

    50% of the phrases spoken by the characters contain "Zussman" (name of one of the characters), this really annoyed!! The whole story of the game is about this guy.

    I noticed that the developers wanted to prioritize the multiplayer mode, which, in my opinion, should not even exist. And "Zombie Mode" is very rough.

    The graphics are great. Gameplay without any innovation, is the same as the other modern CoD.

    Anyway, I played because I'm a fan of the series, but no chance to play it again. I do not recommend it!    … Expand
  19. RagingKilledMe
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    What can you expect from an AAA title featuring the second World War in 2017?
    - Realism
    - An educated view on WWII - Emotion - A fitting, well-layered story - An enthrilling, horrifying campaign that will leave you breathless and create nightmares What does CoD WWII give you? - A cinematic War - A bland view on WWII - Stereotypes and 'major' conflicts between soldiers the player    What can you expect from an AAA title featuring the second World War in 2017?
    - Realism
    - An educated view on WWII
    - Emotion
    - A fitting, well-layered story
    - An enthrilling, horrifying campaign that will leave you breathless and create nightmares

    What does CoD WWII give you?
    - A cinematic War
    - A bland view on WWII
    - Stereotypes and 'major' conflicts between soldiers the player can't care less about
    - A story that doesn't get enough build up, doesn't surprise you and is very predictable until the end
    - A 7 hour campaign that does nothing but frustrate you; there's nothing new here, you've seen this before

    CoD: WWII does well in showing off cinematics and has solid and fun gameplay, but stops right there. Because the story is so bland this game could just as well be another plastic looking game where you're fighting some made-up terrorists like in some previous CoD-titles. CoD isn't trying to make you live through WWII, but trying to rob you of not only your money but also a hope of getting closer to WWII. The producers haven't done their research, they didn't care enough about a solid campaign. But hey, there's a nazi zombie mode!    … Expand
  20. RustyCoin
    Apr 25, 2018
    3
    I am not judging this game only because it has COD brand on it, by any means no. This game is one of the worst PC games in 2017 because it's not a game-only anymore. It's half a movie right now. And this have been happening since Black Ops 1. It was not so terribly cutscenes-based "game" as it is now, but it started at that point. And what we have now? We have - 5-10 minutes of gameplay,I am not judging this game only because it has COD brand on it, by any means no. This game is one of the worst PC games in 2017 because it's not a game-only anymore. It's half a movie right now. And this have been happening since Black Ops 1. It was not so terribly cutscenes-based "game" as it is now, but it started at that point. And what we have now? We have - 5-10 minutes of gameplay, 15-20 minutes cutscenes and the circle goes on. So you get the objective, you go, do some shooting, throw grenades, boom - movie (infinte amount of cutscenes).

    And the quotes in those cutscenes...my god...they are terrible. Seriously, cutscenes like those exist only in bad war movies - "you're long way from texas boy".....

    Multiplayer is also nothing new - boring, monotonous, repetitive stuff, as every year.

    Reason why I'm giving this game 3 out of 10 is because graphics are kinda good actually (although I believe BF 1 still looks better), and visual effects. On big screen or TV effects looks really well. Other than that COD WW2 is a terrible product with boring story, stupid AI, uninteresting characters, lack of variety...the list could go on and on.    … Expand
  21. zNeverSleeping
    Jul 21, 2019
    3
    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa que me incomoda são as animações, que mais parecem de um jogo de PS2, estragando todo realismo que a engine poderia trazer - e não tras, de qualquer forma.    … Expand
  22. Morphine_Child
    Feb 1, 2020
    3
    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's sake you can't even open the doors until your stupid AI scripted friends do it for you. Apparently you are too stupid to do it.

    AI is dumb and completely scripted like everything else. Sometimes they ignore you from 2m, sometimes they have laser accuracy, effectively killing all the fun of gunplay. Shame really.

    Visually the game is ok, on par with 2017 games, but then again, there are better looking games as well. Characters look good, but they are some of the most annoying characters ever in a WWII shooter. They are just painfully stereotypical...

    At the end... I haven't finished this game and I never will. And just to show why exactly everything in this game is devoid of any shape of inspiration and originality, play the tank mission. Here it's obvious that even people that made it never even played it. If you want to finish it, you have set your controls to maximum sensitivity or else you cannot even turn your turret fast enough to aim. Completely and utterly broken mission.

    Anyway, enough about it. Save your money and buy some old WWII classics.    … Expand
  23. Pluk_Dejv
    Jul 4, 2022
    3
    the story is a total joke, full of B-movie clichés. 11 very short missions max 2 hours played with your finger in your nose, the rest are Beck's movies. The return to the health bar and first aid kits replacing the automatic healing system here works well. Call of Duty: WW2 again takes the flak and lets you shoot down not one, not two, but twenty bombers, which obediently fly into yourthe story is a total joke, full of B-movie clichés. 11 very short missions max 2 hours played with your finger in your nose, the rest are Beck's movies. The return to the health bar and first aid kits replacing the automatic healing system here works well. Call of Duty: WW2 again takes the flak and lets you shoot down not one, not two, but twenty bombers, which obediently fly into your wound. Call of Duty: WW2 drives spectacular moments in the style of Michael Bay films. The atmosphere in the ship before the actual landing in Normandy is completely boring, the same mission in Medal of Honor is full of fear, when soldiers pray or vomit, then real chaos breaks out, you won't find such an atmosphere in CoD: WW2. However, the battlegroup system attached to it seems ridiculous. Daniels can ask his teammates for help in the form of first aid kits or ammunition. However, colleague Zussman only gives you medicine if you have killed a sufficient number of enemies before. You cannot give any orders to the companions and they do not even pose any real threat to the enemies. Every now and then it happened to me that there was a German standing next to me in the trench, whom my partner reliably ignored. I literally forced myself to finish it for the price I want for it, it's really not worth it, you'd better buy Medal of Honor allied assault / Pacific Assault… Expand
  24. StarkAgentos
    Mar 28, 2022
    3
    Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.
  25. Benden
    Nov 17, 2017
    2
    The worst Call of Duty game so far, and I've played them all on my different PCs.
    Graphics are good, sound is ok but gameplay is the worst I've seen. Damn heavily scripted and bugged : on several missions you could die with no reasons. Boring : the game is not even damn fun to play and short for the single player part, really short.
    Also game mechanics are so weird : smgs and even    The worst Call of Duty game so far, and I've played them all on my different PCs.
    Graphics are good, sound is ok but gameplay is the worst I've seen. Damn heavily scripted and bugged : on several missions you could die with no reasons. Boring : the game is not even damn fun to play and short for the single player part, really short.
    Also game mechanics are so weird : smgs and even assault rifles requiring half a charger to kill a man, only headsots will save you from constant weapon reload. Scenarios dont make a sense : stukas runs in 1945 ? Weapons : PPSH that soviet smg being used by germans ? Tank battle: was a pain to play, not fun and unrealistic : Sherman should penetrate a panzer 4 from the front, even more those later sherman models (firefly in the game it seems...), same with that mission were you play a P-47 fighter plane : uncontrollable and boring.
    Crap, this sh*t just makes me want to play Medal of honor allied assault they were largely inspired by made ... 12 years ago...    … Expand
  26. Warmuro
    Apr 29, 2018
    2
    They tried to keep up with Battlefield 1, they failed miserably. We don't need another CoD for the next 20 years, i'm sure of that.
  27. Ramiro1992
    Jul 1, 2020
    2
    Crap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots ofCrap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots of potential, the characters are boring and uninteresting, and honestly, I don't care about their personalities, they act so cliche it reminds me to the awful cinematics of BF 1, a bunch of retards doing the voice acting, I WANT TO PLAY A **** GAME NOT WATCH A ****G MOVIE!
    Expect hours and hours of boring and annoying cinematics. Damn, I miss the old days with simple characters, not these stupid npcs that have the ego so high, same crap with BF 1, I DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT THE PERSONALITIES OF THE CHARACTERS!
    Overall, one of the worst COD games to date, a spit in the face for fans that loved the classic
    Soo **** boring, that level where you gotta be that retarded woman and show documents to answer stupid questions, is so damn boring it almost put me to sleep. Looks like a blatant and cheap copy of Medal of Honor, that stupid **** and the documents level are almost the same as the medal of honor games for the original Playstation. I hope they added the women to copy MOH and not a blatant and embarrasing attempt to promote feminsim via this piece of **** game. I am sad man cause this game had lots of potential but they ruined everything with bullet sponges enemies and atrocious gameplay plus stupid AI, even for free this game is a **** scam    … Expand
  28. SRKNZ
    Mar 19, 2019
    2
    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game sell. Maybe, maybe not.

    What does help is creative varied game play and an acknowledgement that the USA was not the only country to fight the Axis. This gets a quick mention at the start in truth but then its USA all the way. No option whatsoever to play another allied or axis nation which would have made the game a lot more diverse and interesting.

    Whats also flawed in this game is like so many others its reliance on "push button" cut scenes where you try to destroy your keyboard attempting to do something pointless like a early on and quite frankly God awful tussle with a German soldier armed with a bayonet. This could and in my opinion should have been left out. It added nothing and the clumsy approach taken to key/mouse combinations was a usability nightmare.

    In short, in my opinion, this is mediocre fare that's repetitive and feels awkward due to the weird mouse key combo's used in the annoying, on best left in the recycle bin ", interactive" cut scenes. 2/10 from me.    … Expand
  29. LifeHistory
    Nov 15, 2017
    2
    What a bad way to throw heck of a comeback...I always dreamed of playing WW2 in such graphics and been waiting for Activiton to go back to the old classics but they failed badly. I never play and care about multiplayer. I mostly play COD games for the SP.

    I am going to make this as short as the game itself! PROS. -Great graphics. -Fantastic atmosphere it like being in the    What a bad way to throw heck of a comeback...I always dreamed of playing WW2 in such graphics and been waiting for Activiton to go back to the old classics but they failed badly. I never play and care about multiplayer. I mostly play COD games for the SP.

    I am going to make this as short as the game itself!
    PROS.
    -Great graphics.
    -Fantastic atmosphere it like being in the battlefield it's alive.
    -Medical kits.
    -Voice acting.
    -PC Optimized.
    CONS.
    -The Singelplayer is like 4h max.
    -It mostly car chase and holding possession and shooting. (Like a mobile game)
    -Too much of a cinematic play.
    -Only 6 chapters that feels rushed and very short.
    -Nothing special about the story.

    I still think infinite Warfare the worst COD still and this takes the second place. If only it was longer and had gameplay like the old ones this would been amazing. Activiton should find itself another series or just quit gaming! Its embarrassing really.    … Expand
  30. Filaton
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    A twitch shooter with lootboxes, dlc and an alternate history WW2 theme. I mean, who wouldn't want to play as a black woman in service of the Wehrmacht.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

21
#21 Most Discussed PC Game of 2017
20
#20 Most Shared PC Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 21
  3. Negative: 1 out of 21
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Jan 6, 2018
    50
    Familiarity breeds contempt. [Issue#269, p.49]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 2, 2018
    80
    The new Call of Duty is like a shopping list, in which the devs list one second-rate cliché after another. It's not always for the sake of it, but it's already making the WWII unique that everybody should play. [Issue#280]
  3. Games.cz
    Jan 2, 2018
    70
    A magnificent, but also a sympathetic, unpretentious return to the roots of the series. Yet the campaign is short-lived, and your next experience depends on how much you enjoy the multiplayer and/or shooting Nazi zombies.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »